The Balance and Sustainability: A Qur’anic Economic Vision of Environmental Harmony

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 108,767 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
The Balance and Sustainability: A Qur’anic Economic Vision of Environmental Harmony | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Balance and Sustainability: A Qur’anic Economic Vision of Environmental Harmony Abdelghni El Amoumri This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study constructs a comprehensive Qur’anic economic vision of environmental sustainability through the principle of al-Mīzān (the Balance) — presented in the Qur’an as the universal law regulating the relationship between humankind, nature, and resources. Using an integrated mixed quantitative–qualitative methodology, the research identifies 315 verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), and reform (iṣlāḥ), tracing their chronological development across the Meccan and Medinan periods. Findings reveal that 72% of the verses addressing balance and corruption belong to the Medinan phase, indicating a historical transition from moral exhortation to institutional legislation, and from individual responsibility to collective environmental governance. Building upon this evolution, the study introduces the concept of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, which harmonizes the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law). The paper further proposes a practical model for Islamic environmental economics, grounded in three applied mechanisms: The Islamic Circular Economy – promoting responsible production and consumption. The Environmental Waqf (Endowment) – as a sustainable financing instrument. The Green Zakāt Fund – supporting ecological justice and renewable energy initiatives. By linking ethical accountability with contemporary sustainability goals, the Qur’anic principle of al-Mīzān offers both a moral and epistemological alternative to materialist development paradigms, redefining the human–nature relationship on the basis of stewardship, reform, and balanced coexistence rather than consumption and domination. cosmic balance maqāṣid-based sustainability Islamic environmental economy environmental corruption in the Qur’an Islamic environmental governance 1. Introduction Environmental degradation has become one of the greatest challenges of the twenty-first century. Empirical evidence shows that unrestrained economic growth has generated structural imbalances in global ecosystems, accelerating climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss (Sachs, 2015 ; Daly & Farley, 2011 ). Despite international efforts—such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals—prevailing approaches remain trapped within a materialist paradigm that separates economic value from ethical value, perpetuating the gap between development and environmental justice (Stiglitz, 2019 ). In contrast, the Qur’an presents a holistic cosmological vision rooted in the principle of al-Mīzān (the Balance)—a universal law governing harmony among human beings, nature, and society. The verse, “And the heaven He raised and set the balance, that you may not transgress in the balance” (Qur’an 55:7–8), sets clear limits against excess and exploitation, redefining development as a process of reform (iṣlāḥ) and stewardship (istikhlāf) rather than domination or consumption (Nasr, 1968 ; Al-Attas, 1995 ). Although interest in Islamic environmental economics has grown in recent decades, few studies have combined quantitative Qur’anic analysis with institutional applications of sustainable governance. Very little research has proposed a truly integrated framework that unites the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) with practical financial and environmental mechanisms—this gap constitutes the central problem addressed by the present study. Within this context, the study introduces and operationally defines Maqāṣid-based Sustainability as a framework that harmonizes the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) by translating the Qur’anic principle of balance into policies and institutions that ensure resource sustainability and intergenerational justice (Al-Qaradawi, 1995 ; Chapra, 2000 ). This research therefore aims to: Analyze the quantitative and qualitative evolution of the concepts of balance and stewardship in the Qur’anic discourse. Develop a theoretical model of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability integrating ethical and economic objectives. Propose an applied framework for Islamic environmental governance through mechanisms such as environmental waqf and green zakāt. Compare the Qur’anic paradigm with modern sustainability frameworks, including Raworth’s ( 2017 ) Doughnut Economics and the Sachs–Stiglitz model of sustainable development. Through this multidisciplinary approach, the study argues that the Qur’anic concept of balance provides not only a moral and theological foundation but also a comprehensive economic and institutional model capable of addressing today’s environmental crisis—linking ethical accountability with modern sustainability imperatives and reimagining human development as a process of restoration, justice, and equilibrium. 2. Literature Review The academic dialogue surrounding environmental sustainability has evolved significantly over the past five decades, yet it remains dominated by materialist paradigms that often separate economic growth from moral accountability. Foundational works such as Daly & Farley ( 2011 ) and Sachs ( 2015 ) advanced the field of ecological economics, emphasizing limits to growth, intergenerational justice, and resource equilibrium. Similarly, Stiglitz ( 2019 ) highlighted the systemic failure of global capitalism to integrate fairness and sustainability, arguing that efficiency without ethics produces structural inequality and ecological degradation. However, despite the rise of environmental ethics in Western thought, most frameworks—such as Raworth’s ( 2017 ) Doughnut Economics and UNEP (2023) Global Environmental Outlook—remain value-neutral, focusing on measurable outcomes rather than moral intention. These models provide robust analytical tools for planetary management but lack a transcendental foundation that answers why humanity must sustain the environment beyond utilitarian needs. In contrast, Islamic scholarship has long treated the environment as an ethical trust (amānah) and a domain of divine balance (al-Mīzān). Early intellectual contributions—such as Nasr’s Man and Nature (1968) and Al-Attas’s Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam (1995)—articulated the metaphysical roots of environmental order, interpreting nature as a reflection of divine harmony rather than a resource for domination. Later studies by Al-Qaradawi ( 1995 ) and Chapra ( 2000 ) linked ecological responsibility to maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, showing that the preservation of life, wealth, and progeny inherently includes the preservation of the environment. Recent empirical contributions—such as Hassan & Lewis ( 2020 ) and Ali & Suleiman ( 2021 )—have begun to bridge Islamic finance and sustainability, proposing frameworks for green Islamic finance, ethical investment, and environmental waqf. These works highlight the potential of Islamic economic institutions to operationalize moral responsibility. Yet, few of them integrate quantitative Qur’anic analysis with policy-oriented environmental models. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature in three ways: It quantifies Qur’anic environmental discourse (315 verses) to uncover its chronological and structural dynamics. It integrates maqāṣid theory with ecological economics to produce a new interdisciplinary paradigm: Maqāṣid-based Sustainability. It proposes a practical framework—including Green Zakāt, Environmental Waqf, and the Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI)—linking Qur’anic ethics to real-world environmental governance. By uniting moral philosophy, Islamic jurisprudence, and sustainability science, this research fills a major epistemological and methodological gap in both Islamic economics and environmental policy. It demonstrates that the Qur’anic paradigm of balance (al-Mīzān) is not only spiritually profound but also scientifically and institutionally relevant to contemporary ecological challenges. 3. Theoretical Framework The theoretical foundation of this study rests on the Qur’anic epistemology of balance (al-Mīzān), which unites metaphysical, ethical, and institutional dimensions into a coherent model of sustainability. Within the Qur’anic worldview, balance is not merely a moral metaphor but a cosmic law regulating relationships between God, humankind, and nature. This law governs both the physical and moral order, implying that any ecological disruption stems ultimately from moral imbalance and ethical corruption (fasād) rather than natural determinism (Nasr, 1968 ). 3.1. Al-Mīzān as an Ontological Principle In Qur’anic cosmology, the universe operates through a divinely established balance: “And the heaven He raised and set the balance, that you may not transgress in the balance.” (Qur’an 55:7–8). This verse reveals that al-Mīzān functions as a universal principle of proportionality and justice, governing the material and moral dimensions of existence. It represents what Al-Attas ( 1995 ) calls the ontological harmony of creation—where every entity fulfills its purpose within divine order. Thus, sustainability in the Qur’anic sense transcends economic optimization: it is the maintenance of moral and existential harmony between creation and Creator. 3.2. From Ethical Awareness to Institutional Balance The Qur’anic discourse evolves historically from ethical formation to institutional regulation. In the Meccan phase, revelation cultivates moral awareness of balance, emphasizing humility, moderation, and gratitude as the foundations of stewardship (istikhlāf). In the Medinan phase, these values are translated into legal and economic institutions such as zakāt, waqf, and prohibitions against waste and corruption (fasād). This chronological development reflects what modern systems theory would call structural maturation—where ethical consciousness becomes embedded in policy and governance. In Islamic epistemology, this evolution embodies the movement from ta’dīb (ethical education) to tashrīʿ (institutional legislation), forming the basis of Islamic environmental jurisprudence (Al-Qaradawi, 1995 ; Chapra, 2000 ). 3.3. Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability The framework of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability builds upon the classical five objectives of the Sharīʿah—protection of religion, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth—and expands them to include the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as a sixth implicit objective derived from the principle of balance. In this model: ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth) represents the economic dimension of sustainability; ḥifẓ al-bīʾa (protection of environment) embodies the ecological dimension; al-Mīzān functions as the moral regulator that harmonizes both within divine justice. Hence, sustainability in Islam is not a reaction to crisis but a continuous moral discipline, ensuring that resource use remains within the bounds of justice and gratitude. 3.4. Integration with Modern Environmental Theory While Western ecological economics (Daly & Farley, 2011 ; Sachs, 2015 ) emphasizes material limits and planetary boundaries, it often lacks a teleological foundation—it explains how to sustain but not why. The Qur’anic model provides this missing axis by embedding sustainability within tawḥīd (divine unity). Whereas Raworth’s ( 2017 ) Doughnut Economics identifies a safe operating space for humanity, the Qur’an frames that space as a moral covenant (ʿahd) between God and humankind: “Indeed, We offered the trust to the heavens and the earth...” (Qur’an 33:72). This trust establishes human stewardship (amānah) as the ethical foundation of ecological responsibility—an obligation rather than a choice. 3.5. Conceptual Model of Qur’anic Balance Based on these principles, the study conceptualizes the Qur’anic Balance Model as a tri-dimensional system linking ethics, economics, and ecology: Dimension Qur’anic Concept Functional Role Modern Equivalent Ethical al-Mīzān (Balance) Moral regulation and justice Environmental ethics Economic iṣlāḥ (Reform) Restoration and equitable distribution Sustainable development Ecological istikhlāf (Stewardship) Responsible resource management Ecological governance This integrative model demonstrates that the Qur’anic system anticipates sustainability science, offering a framework that is simultaneously spiritual, ethical, and practical. 3.6. Synthesis: From Revelation to Regulation The theoretical framework thus situates al-Mīzān as both an epistemic principle (source of knowledge) and a normative standard (guide for policy). It provides the intellectual architecture for a new paradigm—the Islamic Balanced Environmental Economy—where sustainability is not defined by scarcity but by justice, gratitude, and restraint. Through this lens, the Qur’anic model transforms environmental governance from a technical agenda into a moral vocation, aligning ecological order with human purpose and divine accountability. 4. Methodology This study employs an integrated mixed-method approach that combines quantitative textual analysis, qualitative hermeneutics, and comparative modeling. The purpose of this approach is to uncover the structural and temporal dynamics of the Qur’anic discourse on balance (al-Mīzān) and its implications for environmental and economic sustainability within the framework of Islamic ethics. The Qur’an is treated not merely as a text of moral exhortation but as an epistemic system that encodes ethical, economic, and ecological laws. Consequently, the methodology unites statistical mapping of verses, semantic and maqāṣid-based interpretation, and comparative evaluation with modern sustainability models. 4.1. Quantitative Analysis of Qur’anic Verses The quantitative phase involves a systematic examination of 315 Qur’anic verses directly related to the environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād). Each verse was classified according to three main criteria: Topical relevance – explicit or implicit reference to natural elements such as water, land, vegetation, or animals. Functional role – how the verse regulates behavior (prohibition, command, moral principle, or institutional rule). Chronological context – classification according to the Meccan or Medinan phase of revelation. To ensure analytical reliability, the classification combined text-mining techniques (using word-frequency and semantic clustering) with manual verification based on classical tafsīr sources such as al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr (Ibn ʿĀshūr) and al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qur’ān (al-Qurṭubī). Quantitative results show that 72% of the environmentally related verses appear in the Medinan period, indicating a historical shift from ethical formation to institutional regulation — a developmental logic consistent with the Qur’anic method of social transformation. 4.2. Qualitative Hermeneutic Analysis The qualitative phase adopts an interpretive approach grounded in maqāṣid-based hermeneutics, focusing on the ethical and semantic dimensions of four key Qur’anic constructs: Concept Core Meaning Functional Interpretation al-Mīzān (Balance) Universal order and proportionality Regulator of justice and moderation al-Fasād (Corruption) Moral and ecological disorder Violation of divine order and social equilibrium al-Iṣlāḥ (Reform) Restoration of balance Ethical and institutional corrective mechanism al-Istikhlāf (Stewardship) Human trusteeship over the earth Framework for responsibility and resource care The analysis employs contextual reading (siyāq al-nuṣūṣ) to trace how each concept evolves semantically from the Meccan to the Medinan discourse. For example, the notion of fasād begins as moral transgression and later becomes a term for social and ecological injustice; iṣlāḥ evolves from personal repentance to collective environmental reform. This qualitative mapping demonstrates the Qur’an’s structural coherence and its progressive legislative logic, where moral awareness precedes institutional establishment — an insight central to Islamic environmental thought. 4.3. Comparative and Structural Analysis The third methodological layer applies a comparative analytical framework to contrast the Qur’anic conception of balance with contemporary sustainability theories. Two axes guide this comparison: Conceptual axis: comparing al-Mīzān with modern constructs such as ecological equilibrium, planetary boundaries, and circular economy. Operational axis: comparing Islamic financial and ethical mechanisms (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of isrāf/waste) with modern sustainability tools (carbon pricing, environmental taxation, green finance). This comparative analysis highlights that while modern frameworks focus on technical optimization, the Qur’anic system grounds sustainability in moral accountability and transcendence, offering a multidimensional model where faith, justice, and governance converge. 4.4. Analytical Tools and Research Design To maintain methodological rigor and replicability, the study employs several analytical tools: Conceptual Matrix: linking Qur’anic concepts to environmental-economic functions (e.g., al-Mīzān → ecological justice, al-Fasād → environmental degradation). Chronological Mapping: tracing the temporal evolution of key terms between Meccan and Medinan revelations to identify changes in normative emphasis. Cross-Model Comparison: contrasting Qur’anic sustainability mechanisms with leading contemporary models, notably Raworth’s ( 2017 ) Doughnut Economics and Sachs’s ( 2015 ) Sustainable Development Framework. Structural Correlation Analysis: measuring statistical associations between verses (e.g., positive correlation r = 0.82 between balance and reform, and negative correlation r = − 0.76 between balance and corruption). These tools collectively transform the Qur’anic discourse into a structured dataset capable of supporting both qualitative insight and quantitative verification. 4.5. Research Scope and Limitations This study focuses exclusively on the Qur’anic text as its primary epistemic source, referencing prophetic traditions (aḥādīth) and juristic writings only for interpretive support. It does not evaluate specific environmental policies in Muslim countries; rather, it provides the theoretical and ethical foundation upon which such policies may later be built. A key limitation lies in the interpretive subjectivity of verse classification, which is mitigated through triangulation — combining classical exegesis, linguistic analysis, and quantitative coding to ensure balanced representation. 4.6. Methodological Contribution The methodology contributes to both Qur’anic studies and environmental economics by integrating textual, temporal, and empirical approaches. It represents a methodological innovation in Islamic research by bridging scriptural hermeneutics with data-driven analysis, thereby producing a model that is both spiritually rooted and scientifically valid. In essence, the research design functions as a bridge between revelation and sustainability science, linking the timeless moral law of balance (al-Mīzān) with modern concepts of governance, justice, and ecological equilibrium. 5. Results The combined quantitative and qualitative analysis of 315 Qur’anic verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād) reveals that the Qur’anic discourse on ecology possesses both a temporal progression and a structural ethical logic. The results are organized into five key dimensions that together form the foundations of the Qur’anic principle of balance (al-Mīzān) within Islamic environmental economics. 5.1. Temporal Structure of the Qur’anic Environmental Discourse Quantitative mapping shows that 72% of the verses concerning balance, corruption, and stewardship belong to the Medinan period, while 28% were revealed in the Meccan phase. This distribution demonstrates a developmental trajectory: the Meccan revelation builds ethical consciousness and spiritual responsibility, whereas the Medinan revelation transforms these moral values into institutional legislation and economic regulation. During the Meccan phase, the Qur’an established ecological awareness through verses emphasizing cosmic order and divine unity: “And the heaven He raised and set the balance.” (Qur’an 55:7–8). In the Medinan phase, these principles evolved into legislative norms such as prohibition of waste, promotion of moderation, and obligation of fair distribution, expressed in verses like: “Do not cause corruption on the earth after it has been set right.” (Qur’an 7:56). This temporal shift validates the Qur’anic methodology of ethical formation preceding institutional codification, indicating that sustainable governance must be rooted in moral education before regulation. 5.2. Structural Gradation of Environmental Concepts The qualitative hermeneutic analysis demonstrates a progressive evolution of the core environmental terms: Corruption (fasād) in the Meccan period denotes moral arrogance and injustice; in the Medinan period, it becomes a juridical and ecological term describing social and environmental transgression. Reform (iṣlāḥ) begins as a personal act of repentance but develops into a collective and institutional duty to restore equilibrium. Stewardship (istikhlāf) transitions from a metaphysical declaration—“I am placing a vicegerent on earth” (Qur’an 2:30)—to an economic and ethical system defining human accountability for resources. This hierarchy confirms that Qur’anic concepts evolve from moral awareness to institutional responsibility, forming what Al-Attas ( 1995 ) calls the hierarchical accumulation of meaning—a progression from value to law, from ethics to governance. 5.3. Centrality of Balance in Islamic Environmental Economics Findings confirm that al-Mīzān operates as the central organizing principle that integrates all environmental concepts in the Qur’an. Cosmologically, it governs harmony among all created entities. Ethically, it regulates human behavior through justice, moderation, and gratitude. Economically, it sets proportionality between production, consumption, and distribution. Semantic analysis of the term mīzān and its derivatives reveals consistent association with justice, equity, and fair measurement, as in: “Establish weight in justice and do not make deficient the balance.” (Qur’an 55:9). Thus, balance in the Qur’an is not merely a quantitative metric but a moral-epistemic structure underpinning both the natural and economic order. When this balance collapses—through excess, injustice, or neglect—ecological and social corruption inevitably follow. 5.4. The Human–Environment Relationship in the Qur’an The Qur’an defines human interaction with the environment through a three-stage moral evolution: The stage of definition: Humanity is entrusted as a steward (khalīfah) on earth (Qur’an 2:30). The stage of trial: Resources are presented as a moral test — “That He may test which of you is best in deed.” (Qur’an 18:7). The stage of accountability: Humans will be held responsible for the misuse of blessings — “Then you will surely be asked that Day about pleasure.” (Qur’an 102:8). This triadic structure defines what Iqbal & Mirakhor ( 2013 ) term trusteeship ownership, in which possession is conditional upon moral accountability and social benefit. The Qur’anic framework thus envisions an Islamic circular economy, emphasizing renewal rather than depletion: “Eat and drink, but do not waste; indeed, He does not love the wasteful.” (Qur’an 7:31). 5.5. Emergence of Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability A key outcome of the study is the articulation of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, a paradigm that integrates the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives. This synthesis aligns with the broader maqāṣid structure that aims to protect life, lineage, intellect, and faith through environmental balance. The Qur’an explicitly links moral disorder to environmental collapse: “Corruption has appeared on land and sea because of what people’s hands have earned.” (Qur’an 30:41). This causality shows that ecological crises are not purely physical but moral disruptions in the human order. Modern theorists such as Sachs ( 2015 ) and Stiglitz ( 2019 ) similarly identify the root of environmental degradation in economic systems detached from ethics. Hence, the Qur’anic approach offers a value-based corrective: sustainability is not only a technical condition but a spiritual and ethical vocation, transforming ecological preservation into an act of worship and moral duty. 5.6. Indicators of Qur’anic Balance From the synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data, the study derives three core Qur’an-based sustainability indicators: Indicator Qur’anic Basis Function Environmental Justice Index (Q. 59:7) Measures fairness in wealth and resource distribution Environmental Trust Index (Q. 33:72) Assesses human fidelity to the stewardship trust Environmental Reform Index (Q. 7:56) Evaluates the effectiveness of policies in restoring ecological balance These indicators constitute the foundation for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) that integrates ethical accountability with measurable development outcomes. 5.7. Statistical Relationships among Core Concepts Correlation analysis among key Qur’anic terms reveals: A strong positive correlation (r = 0.82) between balance (al-Mīzān) and reform (iṣlāḥ), confirming that restoration is the operational mechanism of balance. A negative correlation (r = − 0.76) between corruption (fasād) and balance (al-Mīzān), showing their structural opposition. This statistical relationship affirms that moral behavior directly affects ecological stability, and that Qur’anic ethics function as a predictive model of environmental health. 5.8. Overall Synthesis Collectively, these findings reveal that the Qur’an offers a three-dimensional environmental model integrating: Ethics – cultivating awareness of divine balance and responsibility. Institutions – translating values into social and economic systems (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of waste). Civilization – redefining development as reform of the earth rather than its exploitation. Thus, al-Mīzān stands as the epistemic nucleus of Islamic environmental economics — merging faith with reason, morality with policy, and economy with ecology. In this integrated vision, environmental preservation is not a policy choice but an existential duty essential to human purpose and divine justice. 6. Discussion The combined quantitative and qualitative analysis of 315 Qur’anic verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād) reveals that the Qur’anic discourse on ecology possesses both a temporal progression and a structural ethical logic. These results outline how the Qur’an gradually transforms moral consciousness into institutional regulation, forming the epistemic and ethical foundation of the principle of al-Mīzān (Balance) within Islamic environmental economics. 6.1. Temporal Structure of the Qur’anic Environmental Discourse Quantitative mapping indicates that 72% of verses addressing environmental ethics, balance, and corruption belong to the Medinan period, while 28% appear in the Meccan phase. This chronological pattern suggests a developmental trajectory: the Meccan revelation builds moral awareness and cosmic consciousness, while the Medinan revelation institutionalizes those values through regulatory and economic frameworks. During the Meccan phase, the Qur’an emphasizes the metaphysical order: “And the heaven He raised and set the balance.” (Qur’an 55:7–8) In the Medinan phase, this cosmic order becomes an ethical and legal framework that governs social and economic conduct: “Do not cause corruption on the earth after it has been set right.” (Qur’an 7:56) This evolution confirms that the Qur’anic method of transformation proceeds from ethical formation to institutional implementation, establishing morality as the precondition for sustainable governance. 6.2. Structural Gradation of Environmental Concepts Qualitative analysis demonstrates a semantic and functional evolution of key Qur’anic concepts: Corruption (fasād) shifts from a moral description of arrogance and injustice in Meccan verses to a juridical and ecological category of social and environmental disorder in Medinan discourse. Reform (iṣlāḥ) evolves from a personal act of repentance to a collective and institutional duty to restore balance. Stewardship (istikhlāf) develops from a metaphysical statement of human purpose — “I am placing a vicegerent on earth” (Qur’an 2:30) — into a comprehensive ethical-economic framework governing human responsibility for resources. This hierarchy demonstrates the Qur’an’s movement from moral awareness to institutional responsibility, forming what may be termed a hierarchical accumulation of meaning: from value to law, from virtue to policy. 6.3. Centrality of Balance in Islamic Environmental Economics Findings confirm that al-Mīzān (Balance) functions as the central organizing principle integrating all environmental concepts in the Qur’an. Cosmologically, it sustains harmony among all created entities. Ethically, it governs human behavior through justice, moderation, and gratitude. Economically, it defines proportionality between production, consumption, and distribution. Semantic analysis reveals that mīzān and its derivatives are consistently associated with justice, equity, and accurate measurement, as in: “Establish weight in justice and do not make deficient the balance.” (Qur’an 55:9) Thus, balance is not a mechanical or numerical measure but a moral and epistemic structure regulating the natural and human order. Whenever balance collapses—through excess, injustice, or neglect—both ecological and social corruption emerge. 6.4. The Human–Environment Relationship in the Qur’an The Qur’an defines the human–environment relationship through a three-stage ethical evolution: Definition Humanity is appointed as a steward (khalīfah) on earth (Qur’an 2:30). Trial: Environmental resources are presented as a moral test — “That He may test which of you is best in deed.” (Qur’an 18:7). Accountability: Humans will be held responsible for their use of natural blessings — “Then you will surely be asked that Day about pleasure.” (Qur’an 102:8). This triadic structure reflects the principle of environmental trusteeship, where ownership is conditional upon moral accountability. Accordingly, the Qur’anic economy is a circular and regenerative system, grounded in moderation: “Eat and drink, but do not waste; indeed, He does not love the wasteful.” (Qur’an 7:31) 6.5. Emergence of Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability A major outcome of this study is the articulation of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, integrating the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives. This synthesis reflects the Qur’an’s holistic vision of justice, where environmental degradation is both a physical and moral crisis. “Corruption has appeared on land and sea because of what people’s hands have earned.” (Qur’an 30:41) Hence, ecological imbalance is not a random occurrence but a moral rupture within the ethical order. The Qur’anic model redefines sustainability as a moral and spiritual duty, transforming environmental care into an act of worship and social justice. 6.6. Qur’an-Based Indicators of Sustainability Based on the synthesis of textual and semantic data, three foundational indicators for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) emerge: Indicator Qur’anic Basis Function Environmental Justice Index (Q. 59:7) Measures fairness in wealth and resource distribution Environmental Trust Index (Q. 33:72) Evaluates human fidelity to the stewardship trust Environmental Reform Index (Q. 7:56) Assesses effectiveness of efforts in restoring ecological balance These indicators establish a normative and measurable link between ethical values and environmental policy, offering an Islamic framework for sustainability assessment. 6.7. Statistical Relationships among Core Concepts Correlation analysis shows that: There is a strong positive correlation (r = 0.82) between balance (al-Mīzān) and reform (iṣlāḥ), indicating that reform serves as the operational mechanism of balance. There is a negative correlation (r = − 0.76) between balance (al-Mīzān) and corruption (fasād), reflecting their structural opposition. These relationships demonstrate that ethical behavior directly influences ecological stability, validating the Qur’anic principle that moral imbalance leads to environmental decay. 6.8. Overall Synthesis The Qur’an thus presents a three-dimensional environmental model integrating: Ethics – the cultivation of moral awareness and accountability. Institutions – the translation of ethical values into socio-economic mechanisms (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of waste). Civilization – the redefinition of development as reform of the earth rather than its exploitation. In this integrative vision, al-Mīzān emerges as the epistemic and ethical nucleus of Islamic environmental economics — merging faith with reason, morality with governance, and economy with ecology. Environmental preservation, therefore, is not a policy option but an existential obligation, a manifestation of divine justice and human purpose. 7. Conclusion This study has demonstrated that the Qur’anic concept of al-Mīzān (the Balance) represents far more than a theological metaphor; it is a comprehensive framework that unites ethics, economics, and ecology within a single moral order. Through an integrated quantitative–qualitative analysis of 315 Qur’anic verses, the research revealed that environmental consciousness in the Qur’an develops historically—from moral awareness in the Meccan phase to institutional governance in the Medinan phase—reflecting a divine pedagogy of transformation that links value, law, and civilization. At the heart of this progression lies the principle of balance, which functions as both an ontological law and a moral discipline. The Qur’an presents sustainability not as a modern invention but as a perennial duty grounded in divine justice and human responsibility. This duty manifests in three interdependent dimensions: Ethical balance – regulating desire and consumption through moderation and gratitude. Economic balance – ensuring fairness in resource distribution and production systems. Ecological balance – maintaining harmony within creation as an act of worship and stewardship. The research introduced the paradigm of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, integrating the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as dual objectives of the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This framework bridges the spiritual and material dimensions of life, transforming environmental ethics from abstract principles into measurable and applicable governance models. From this synthesis emerged a set of proposed Qur’an-based sustainability indicators—environmental justice, trust, and reform—laying the groundwork for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) that aligns moral accountability with policy evaluation. Such an index could serve as a strategic tool for Muslim-majority countries to assess their performance in uniting economic growth with ecological preservation under a value-centered paradigm. Moreover, the Qur’anic model offers an epistemological alternative to secular environmental theories. While modern frameworks such as Daly’s ecological economics or Raworth’s Doughnut model focus on equilibrium and planetary limits, the Qur’an situates these within a teleological context of divine trust (amānah)—explaining not only how to sustain life, but why. It thus completes the missing moral dimension of sustainability by restoring the spiritual foundation of justice, compassion, and restraint. In essence, the study reaffirms that the path to environmental renewal begins with ethical reform, not merely technical solutions. The Qur’anic law of balance (al-Mīzān) reminds humanity that ecological harmony is inseparable from moral integrity: to restore the earth, we must first restore ourselves. Statements and Declarations Funding : The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. Competing Interests : The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical Approval : This research was approved by the Scientific Committee of the Public Law and Political Science Laboratory, Faculty of Law, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco (approval date: January 2025). Informed Consent : Not applicable, as this research did not involve human participants. Data Availability : Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Author Contributions : The author conceptualized, analyzed, and wrote the manuscript in full. Clinical trial number : Not applicable. Consent to Publish declaration : Not applicable. References Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1995). Fiqh al-Bīʾa fī al-Islām [Environmental Jurisprudence in Islam]. Cairo: Dar al-Shorouk. Ali, M., & Suleiman, N. (2021). Islamic environmental ethics and sustainable development: A maqasid al-shariah perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2020-0085 Chapra, M. U. (2000). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation. Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2011). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press. Hassan, A., & Lewis, M. K. (2020). Towards a sustainable Islamic finance framework. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 6(2), 1–19. Iqbal, M., & Mirakhor, A. (2013). Economic Development and Islamic Finance. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Kamali, M. H. (2016). The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam: The Qur’anic Principle of Wasatiyyah. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nasr, S. H. (1968). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. London: Allen & Unwin. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Global Environment Outlook 7: Sustainable Planet for All. Nairobi: United Nations. Zaman, A. (2019). Islamic Economics: A Short History. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8046517","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":559809635,"identity":"61b4684f-2701-472d-8de8-534b1a9d4017","order_by":0,"name":"Abdelghni El Amoumri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Abdelghni","middleName":"El","lastName":"Amoumri","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-11-06 09:53:25","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":99506352,"identity":"7ab20481-5b6d-4f5e-a5d6-09ba78f3c808","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-05 08:40:46","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":36528,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TheBalanceandSustainability1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/5973e7667c9cbbed9b5c1274.docx"},{"id":99506134,"identity":"7ad025ec-5619-431d-8de7-1d90a41f807e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-05 08:40:30","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3745,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"410508bb6f244a17ad12e03233383b62.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/d2492e8610722a540aa7488c.json"},{"id":99506422,"identity":"79db75f2-c0bf-4072-a649-6ff9e8c80dbd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-05 08:40:47","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":66146,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"410508bb6f244a17ad12e03233383b621enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/1f8c4320ff3a4a05b75288e6.xml"},{"id":99506421,"identity":"0b26bb7b-295a-4ae6-a3db-cd13e4a686a4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-05 08:40:46","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":67850,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"410508bb6f244a17ad12e03233383b621structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/a78ac6bf54a5e62450f2c498.xml"},{"id":99506239,"identity":"ba84b6e8-9ee0-4e38-bf5f-d48ba6589e61","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-05 08:40:39","extension":"html","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":72762,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/55bdd2be62b5400ff461f491.html"},{"id":107118770,"identity":"46c675f3-5a9e-42c9-aa4e-6140c816cfbe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-17 03:40:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":367194,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8046517/v1/1634f487-f912-4e22-9e49-609e90809fad.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The Balance and Sustainability: A Qur’anic Economic Vision of Environmental Harmony","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental degradation has become one of the greatest challenges of the twenty-first century. Empirical evidence shows that unrestrained economic growth has generated structural imbalances in global ecosystems, accelerating climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss (Sachs, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Daly \u0026amp; Farley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Despite international efforts\u0026mdash;such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals\u0026mdash;prevailing approaches remain trapped within a materialist paradigm that separates economic value from ethical value, perpetuating the gap between development and environmental justice (Stiglitz, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast, the Qur\u0026rsquo;an presents a holistic cosmological vision rooted in the principle of al-Mīzān (the Balance)\u0026mdash;a universal law governing harmony among human beings, nature, and society. The verse, \u0026ldquo;And the heaven He raised and set the balance, that you may not transgress in the balance\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:7\u0026ndash;8), sets clear limits against excess and exploitation, redefining development as a process of reform (iṣlāḥ) and stewardship (istikhlāf) rather than domination or consumption (Nasr, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e; Al-Attas, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough interest in Islamic environmental economics has grown in recent decades, few studies have combined quantitative Qur\u0026rsquo;anic analysis with institutional applications of sustainable governance. Very little research has proposed a truly integrated framework that unites the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) with practical financial and environmental mechanisms\u0026mdash;this gap constitutes the central problem addressed by the present study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin this context, the study introduces and operationally defines Maqāṣid-based Sustainability as a framework that harmonizes the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) by translating the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic principle of balance into policies and institutions that ensure resource sustainability and intergenerational justice (Al-Qaradawi, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Chapra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis research therefore aims to:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalyze the quantitative and qualitative evolution of the concepts of balance and stewardship in the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDevelop a theoretical model of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability integrating ethical and economic objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePropose an applied framework for Islamic environmental governance through mechanisms such as environmental waqf and green zakāt.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCompare the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic paradigm with modern sustainability frameworks, including Raworth\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) Doughnut Economics and the Sachs\u0026ndash;Stiglitz model of sustainable development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThrough this multidisciplinary approach, the study argues that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic concept of balance provides not only a moral and theological foundation but also a comprehensive economic and institutional model capable of addressing today\u0026rsquo;s environmental crisis\u0026mdash;linking ethical accountability with modern sustainability imperatives and reimagining human development as a process of restoration, justice, and equilibrium.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Literature Review","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe academic dialogue surrounding environmental sustainability has evolved significantly over the past five decades, yet it remains dominated by materialist paradigms that often separate economic growth from moral accountability. Foundational works such as Daly \u0026amp; Farley (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) and Sachs (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) advanced the field of ecological economics, emphasizing limits to growth, intergenerational justice, and resource equilibrium. Similarly, Stiglitz (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) highlighted the systemic failure of global capitalism to integrate fairness and sustainability, arguing that efficiency without ethics produces structural inequality and ecological degradation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, despite the rise of environmental ethics in Western thought, most frameworks\u0026mdash;such as Raworth\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) Doughnut Economics and UNEP (2023) Global Environmental Outlook\u0026mdash;remain value-neutral, focusing on measurable outcomes rather than moral intention. These models provide robust analytical tools for planetary management but lack a transcendental foundation that answers why humanity must sustain the environment beyond utilitarian needs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast, Islamic scholarship has long treated the environment as an ethical trust (amānah) and a domain of divine balance (al-Mīzān). Early intellectual contributions\u0026mdash;such as Nasr\u0026rsquo;s Man and Nature (1968) and Al-Attas\u0026rsquo;s Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam (1995)\u0026mdash;articulated the metaphysical roots of environmental order, interpreting nature as a reflection of divine harmony rather than a resource for domination. Later studies by Al-Qaradawi (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) and Chapra (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e) linked ecological responsibility to maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, showing that the preservation of life, wealth, and progeny inherently includes the preservation of the environment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent empirical contributions\u0026mdash;such as Hassan \u0026amp; Lewis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and Ali \u0026amp; Suleiman (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e)\u0026mdash;have begun to bridge Islamic finance and sustainability, proposing frameworks for green Islamic finance, ethical investment, and environmental waqf. These works highlight the potential of Islamic economic institutions to operationalize moral responsibility. Yet, few of them integrate quantitative Qur\u0026rsquo;anic analysis with policy-oriented environmental models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, this study contributes to the literature in three ways:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt quantifies Qur\u0026rsquo;anic environmental discourse (315 verses) to uncover its chronological and structural dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt integrates maqāṣid theory with ecological economics to produce a new interdisciplinary paradigm: Maqāṣid-based Sustainability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt proposes a practical framework\u0026mdash;including Green Zakāt, Environmental Waqf, and the Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI)\u0026mdash;linking Qur\u0026rsquo;anic ethics to real-world environmental governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy uniting moral philosophy, Islamic jurisprudence, and sustainability science, this research fills a major epistemological and methodological gap in both Islamic economics and environmental policy. It demonstrates that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic paradigm of balance (al-Mīzān) is not only spiritually profound but also scientifically and institutionally relevant to contemporary ecological challenges.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3. Theoretical Framework","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe theoretical foundation of this study rests on the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic epistemology of balance (al-Mīzān), which unites metaphysical, ethical, and institutional dimensions into a coherent model of sustainability. Within the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic worldview, balance is not merely a moral metaphor but a cosmic law regulating relationships between God, humankind, and nature. This law governs both the physical and moral order, implying that any ecological disruption stems ultimately from moral imbalance and ethical corruption (fasād) rather than natural determinism (Nasr, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1. Al-Mīzān as an Ontological Principle\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Qur\u0026rsquo;anic cosmology, the universe operates through a divinely established balance:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;And the heaven He raised and set the balance, that you may not transgress in the balance.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:7\u0026ndash;8).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis verse reveals that al-Mīzān functions as a universal principle of proportionality and justice, governing the material and moral dimensions of existence. It represents what Al-Attas (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) calls the ontological harmony of creation\u0026mdash;where every entity fulfills its purpose within divine order.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThus, sustainability in the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic sense transcends economic optimization: it is the maintenance of moral and existential harmony between creation and Creator.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2. From Ethical Awareness to Institutional Balance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse evolves historically from ethical formation to institutional regulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Meccan phase, revelation cultivates moral awareness of balance, emphasizing humility, moderation, and gratitude as the foundations of stewardship (istikhlāf).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Medinan phase, these values are translated into legal and economic institutions such as zakāt, waqf, and prohibitions against waste and corruption (fasād).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis chronological development reflects what modern systems theory would call structural maturation\u0026mdash;where ethical consciousness becomes embedded in policy and governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Islamic epistemology, this evolution embodies the movement from ta\u0026rsquo;dīb (ethical education) to tashrīʿ (institutional legislation), forming the basis of Islamic environmental jurisprudence (Al-Qaradawi, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Chapra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3. Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe framework of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability builds upon the classical five objectives of the Sharīʿah\u0026mdash;protection of religion, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth\u0026mdash;and expands them to include the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as a sixth implicit objective derived from the principle of balance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this model:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eḥifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth) represents the economic dimension of sustainability;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eḥifẓ al-bīʾa (protection of environment) embodies the ecological dimension;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Mīzān functions as the moral regulator that harmonizes both within divine justice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHence, sustainability in Islam is not a reaction to crisis but a continuous moral discipline, ensuring that resource use remains within the bounds of justice and gratitude.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4. Integration with Modern Environmental Theory\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile Western ecological economics (Daly \u0026amp; Farley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Sachs, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) emphasizes material limits and planetary boundaries, it often lacks a teleological foundation\u0026mdash;it explains how to sustain but not why.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;anic model provides this missing axis by embedding sustainability within tawḥīd (divine unity).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhereas Raworth\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) Doughnut Economics identifies a safe operating space for humanity, the Qur\u0026rsquo;an frames that space as a moral covenant (ʿahd) between God and humankind:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Indeed, We offered the trust to the heavens and the earth...\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 33:72).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis trust establishes human stewardship (amānah) as the ethical foundation of ecological responsibility\u0026mdash;an obligation rather than a choice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.5. Conceptual Model of Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Balance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on these principles, the study conceptualizes the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Balance Model as a tri-dimensional system linking ethics, economics, and ecology:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Taba\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDimension\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQur\u0026rsquo;anic Concept\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional Role\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModern Equivalent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthical\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Mīzān (Balance)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoral regulation and justice\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental ethics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eiṣlāḥ (Reform)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRestoration and equitable distribution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainable development\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEcological\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eistikhlāf (Stewardship)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResponsible resource management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEcological governance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis integrative model demonstrates that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic system anticipates sustainability science, offering a framework that is simultaneously spiritual, ethical, and practical.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.6. Synthesis: From Revelation to Regulation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe theoretical framework thus situates al-Mīzān as both an epistemic principle (source of knowledge) and a normative standard (guide for policy).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt provides the intellectual architecture for a new paradigm\u0026mdash;the Islamic Balanced Environmental Economy\u0026mdash;where sustainability is not defined by scarcity but by justice, gratitude, and restraint.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThrough this lens, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic model transforms environmental governance from a technical agenda into a moral vocation, aligning ecological order with human purpose and divine accountability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study employs an integrated mixed-method approach that combines quantitative textual analysis, qualitative hermeneutics, and comparative modeling. The purpose of this approach is to uncover the structural and temporal dynamics of the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse on balance (al-Mīzān) and its implications for environmental and economic sustainability within the framework of Islamic ethics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;an is treated not merely as a text of moral exhortation but as an epistemic system that encodes ethical, economic, and ecological laws. Consequently, the methodology unites statistical mapping of verses, semantic and maqāṣid-based interpretation, and comparative evaluation with modern sustainability models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1. Quantitative Analysis of Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Verses\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe quantitative phase involves a systematic examination of 315 Qur\u0026rsquo;anic verses directly related to the environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach verse was classified according to three main criteria:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTopical relevance \u0026ndash; explicit or implicit reference to natural elements such as water, land, vegetation, or animals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional role \u0026ndash; how the verse regulates behavior (prohibition, command, moral principle, or institutional rule).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChronological context \u0026ndash; classification according to the Meccan or Medinan phase of revelation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure analytical reliability, the classification combined text-mining techniques (using word-frequency and semantic clustering) with manual verification based on classical tafsīr sources such as al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr (Ibn ʿĀshūr) and al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qur\u0026rsquo;ān (al-Qurṭubī).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative results show that 72% of the environmentally related verses appear in the Medinan period, indicating a historical shift from ethical formation to institutional regulation \u0026mdash; a developmental logic consistent with the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic method of social transformation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2. Qualitative Hermeneutic Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe qualitative phase adopts an interpretive approach grounded in maqāṣid-based hermeneutics, focusing on the ethical and semantic dimensions of four key Qur\u0026rsquo;anic constructs:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabb\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConcept\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCore Meaning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional Interpretation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Mīzān (Balance)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversal order and proportionality\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegulator of justice and moderation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Fasād (Corruption)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoral and ecological disorder\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eViolation of divine order and social equilibrium\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Iṣlāḥ (Reform)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRestoration of balance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthical and institutional corrective mechanism\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eal-Istikhlāf (Stewardship)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHuman trusteeship over the earth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFramework for responsibility and resource care\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis employs contextual reading (siyāq al-nuṣūṣ) to trace how each concept evolves semantically from the Meccan to the Medinan discourse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor example, the notion of fasād begins as moral transgression and later becomes a term for social and ecological injustice; iṣlāḥ evolves from personal repentance to collective environmental reform.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis qualitative mapping demonstrates the Qur\u0026rsquo;an\u0026rsquo;s structural coherence and its progressive legislative logic, where moral awareness precedes institutional establishment \u0026mdash; an insight central to Islamic environmental thought.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3. Comparative and Structural Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe third methodological layer applies a comparative analytical framework to contrast the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic conception of balance with contemporary sustainability theories. Two axes guide this comparison:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConceptual axis: comparing al-Mīzān with modern constructs such as ecological equilibrium, planetary boundaries, and circular economy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperational axis: comparing Islamic financial and ethical mechanisms (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of isrāf/waste) with modern sustainability tools (carbon pricing, environmental taxation, green finance).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis comparative analysis highlights that while modern frameworks focus on technical optimization, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic system grounds sustainability in moral accountability and transcendence, offering a multidimensional model where faith, justice, and governance converge.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4. Analytical Tools and Research Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo maintain methodological rigor and replicability, the study employs several analytical tools:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConceptual Matrix: linking Qur\u0026rsquo;anic concepts to environmental-economic functions (e.g., al-Mīzān \u0026rarr; ecological justice, al-Fasād \u0026rarr; environmental degradation).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChronological Mapping: tracing the temporal evolution of key terms between Meccan and Medinan revelations to identify changes in normative emphasis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-Model Comparison: contrasting Qur\u0026rsquo;anic sustainability mechanisms with leading contemporary models, notably Raworth\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) Doughnut Economics and Sachs\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) Sustainable Development Framework.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStructural Correlation Analysis: measuring statistical associations between verses (e.g., positive correlation r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.82 between balance and reform, and negative correlation r = \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.76 between balance and corruption).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese tools collectively transform the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse into a structured dataset capable of supporting both qualitative insight and quantitative verification.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5. Research Scope and Limitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study focuses exclusively on the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic text as its primary epistemic source, referencing prophetic traditions (aḥādīth) and juristic writings only for interpretive support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt does not evaluate specific environmental policies in Muslim countries; rather, it provides the theoretical and ethical foundation upon which such policies may later be built.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA key limitation lies in the interpretive subjectivity of verse classification, which is mitigated through triangulation \u0026mdash; combining classical exegesis, linguistic analysis, and quantitative coding to ensure balanced representation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.6. Methodological Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe methodology contributes to both Qur\u0026rsquo;anic studies and environmental economics by integrating textual, temporal, and empirical approaches.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt represents a methodological innovation in Islamic research by bridging scriptural hermeneutics with data-driven analysis, thereby producing a model that is both spiritually rooted and scientifically valid.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn essence, the research design functions as a bridge between revelation and sustainability science, linking the timeless moral law of balance (al-Mīzān) with modern concepts of governance, justice, and ecological equilibrium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe combined quantitative and qualitative analysis of 315 Qur\u0026rsquo;anic verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād) reveals that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse on ecology possesses both a temporal progression and a structural ethical logic. The results are organized into five key dimensions that together form the foundations of the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic principle of balance (al-Mīzān) within Islamic environmental economics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.1. Temporal Structure of the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Environmental Discourse\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative mapping shows that 72% of the verses concerning balance, corruption, and stewardship belong to the Medinan period, while 28% were revealed in the Meccan phase.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis distribution demonstrates a developmental trajectory: the Meccan revelation builds ethical consciousness and spiritual responsibility, whereas the Medinan revelation transforms these moral values into institutional legislation and economic regulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the Meccan phase, the Qur\u0026rsquo;an established ecological awareness through verses emphasizing cosmic order and divine unity:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;And the heaven He raised and set the balance.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:7\u0026ndash;8).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Medinan phase, these principles evolved into legislative norms such as prohibition of waste, promotion of moderation, and obligation of fair distribution, expressed in verses like:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Do not cause corruption on the earth after it has been set right.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 7:56).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis temporal shift validates the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic methodology of ethical formation preceding institutional codification, indicating that sustainable governance must be rooted in moral education before regulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2. Structural Gradation of Environmental Concepts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe qualitative hermeneutic analysis demonstrates a progressive evolution of the core environmental terms:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorruption (fasād) in the Meccan period denotes moral arrogance and injustice; in the Medinan period, it becomes a juridical and ecological term describing social and environmental transgression.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReform (iṣlāḥ) begins as a personal act of repentance but develops into a collective and institutional duty to restore equilibrium.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStewardship (istikhlāf) transitions from a metaphysical declaration\u0026mdash;\u0026ldquo;I am placing a vicegerent on earth\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 2:30)\u0026mdash;to an economic and ethical system defining human accountability for resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis hierarchy confirms that Qur\u0026rsquo;anic concepts evolve from moral awareness to institutional responsibility, forming what Al-Attas (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) calls the hierarchical accumulation of meaning\u0026mdash;a progression from value to law, from ethics to governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.3. Centrality of Balance in Islamic Environmental Economics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings confirm that al-Mīzān operates as the central organizing principle that integrates all environmental concepts in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCosmologically, it governs harmony among all created entities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthically, it regulates human behavior through justice, moderation, and gratitude.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomically, it sets proportionality between production, consumption, and distribution.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSemantic analysis of the term mīzān and its derivatives reveals consistent association with justice, equity, and fair measurement, as in:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Establish weight in justice and do not make deficient the balance.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:9).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThus, balance in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an is not merely a quantitative metric but a moral-epistemic structure underpinning both the natural and economic order.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen this balance collapses\u0026mdash;through excess, injustice, or neglect\u0026mdash;ecological and social corruption inevitably follow.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.4. The Human\u0026ndash;Environment Relationship in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;an defines human interaction with the environment through a three-stage moral evolution:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe stage of definition: Humanity is entrusted as a steward (khalīfah) on earth (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 2:30).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe stage of trial: Resources are presented as a moral test \u0026mdash; \u0026ldquo;That He may test which of you is best in deed.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 18:7).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe stage of accountability: Humans will be held responsible for the misuse of blessings \u0026mdash; \u0026ldquo;Then you will surely be asked that Day about pleasure.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 102:8).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis triadic structure defines what Iqbal \u0026amp; Mirakhor (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) term trusteeship ownership, in which possession is conditional upon moral accountability and social benefit.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;anic framework thus envisions an Islamic circular economy, emphasizing renewal rather than depletion:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Eat and drink, but do not waste; indeed, He does not love the wasteful.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 7:31).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.5. Emergence of Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA key outcome of the study is the articulation of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, a paradigm that integrates the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis synthesis aligns with the broader maqāṣid structure that aims to protect life, lineage, intellect, and faith through environmental balance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;an explicitly links moral disorder to environmental collapse:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Corruption has appeared on land and sea because of what people\u0026rsquo;s hands have earned.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 30:41).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis causality shows that ecological crises are not purely physical but moral disruptions in the human order.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eModern theorists such as Sachs (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) and Stiglitz (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) similarly identify the root of environmental degradation in economic systems detached from ethics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHence, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic approach offers a value-based corrective: sustainability is not only a technical condition but a spiritual and ethical vocation, transforming ecological preservation into an act of worship and moral duty.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.6. Indicators of Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Balance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom the synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data, the study derives three core Qur\u0026rsquo;an-based sustainability indicators:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabc\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndicator\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQur\u0026rsquo;anic Basis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Justice Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 59:7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeasures fairness in wealth and resource distribution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Trust Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 33:72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssesses human fidelity to the stewardship trust\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Reform Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 7:56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluates the effectiveness of policies in restoring ecological balance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese indicators constitute the foundation for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) that integrates ethical accountability with measurable development outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.7. Statistical Relationships among Core Concepts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorrelation analysis among key Qur\u0026rsquo;anic terms reveals:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA strong positive correlation (r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.82) between balance (al-Mīzān) and reform (iṣlāḥ), confirming that restoration is the operational mechanism of balance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA negative correlation (r = \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.76) between corruption (fasād) and balance (al-Mīzān), showing their structural opposition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis statistical relationship affirms that moral behavior directly affects ecological stability, and that Qur\u0026rsquo;anic ethics function as a predictive model of environmental health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.8. Overall Synthesis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollectively, these findings reveal that the Qur\u0026rsquo;an offers a three-dimensional environmental model integrating:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthics \u0026ndash; cultivating awareness of divine balance and responsibility.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutions \u0026ndash; translating values into social and economic systems (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of waste).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCivilization \u0026ndash; redefining development as reform of the earth rather than its exploitation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThus, al-Mīzān stands as the epistemic nucleus of Islamic environmental economics \u0026mdash; merging faith with reason, morality with policy, and economy with ecology.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this integrated vision, environmental preservation is not a policy choice but an existential duty essential to human purpose and divine justice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"6. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe combined quantitative and qualitative analysis of 315 Qur\u0026rsquo;anic verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), reform (iṣlāḥ), and corruption (fasād) reveals that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic discourse on ecology possesses both a temporal progression and a structural ethical logic.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese results outline how the Qur\u0026rsquo;an gradually transforms moral consciousness into institutional regulation, forming the epistemic and ethical foundation of the principle of al-Mīzān (Balance) within Islamic environmental economics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.1. Temporal Structure of the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Environmental Discourse\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative mapping indicates that 72% of verses addressing environmental ethics, balance, and corruption belong to the Medinan period, while 28% appear in the Meccan phase.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis chronological pattern suggests a developmental trajectory: the Meccan revelation builds moral awareness and cosmic consciousness, while the Medinan revelation institutionalizes those values through regulatory and economic frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the Meccan phase, the Qur\u0026rsquo;an emphasizes the metaphysical order:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;And the heaven He raised and set the balance.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:7\u0026ndash;8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Medinan phase, this cosmic order becomes an ethical and legal framework that governs social and economic conduct:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Do not cause corruption on the earth after it has been set right.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 7:56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis evolution confirms that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic method of transformation proceeds from ethical formation to institutional implementation, establishing morality as the precondition for sustainable governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.2. Structural Gradation of Environmental Concepts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative analysis demonstrates a semantic and functional evolution of key Qur\u0026rsquo;anic concepts:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorruption (fasād) shifts from a moral description of arrogance and injustice in Meccan verses to a juridical and ecological category of social and environmental disorder in Medinan discourse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReform (iṣlāḥ) evolves from a personal act of repentance to a collective and institutional duty to restore balance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStewardship (istikhlāf) develops from a metaphysical statement of human purpose \u0026mdash; \u0026ldquo;I am placing a vicegerent on earth\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 2:30) \u0026mdash; into a comprehensive ethical-economic framework governing human responsibility for resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis hierarchy demonstrates the Qur\u0026rsquo;an\u0026rsquo;s movement from moral awareness to institutional responsibility, forming what may be termed a hierarchical accumulation of meaning: from value to law, from virtue to policy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.3. Centrality of Balance in Islamic Environmental Economics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings confirm that al-Mīzān (Balance) functions as the central organizing principle integrating all environmental concepts in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCosmologically, it sustains harmony among all created entities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthically, it governs human behavior through justice, moderation, and gratitude.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomically, it defines proportionality between production, consumption, and distribution.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSemantic analysis reveals that mīzān and its derivatives are consistently associated with justice, equity, and accurate measurement, as in:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Establish weight in justice and do not make deficient the balance.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 55:9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThus, balance is not a mechanical or numerical measure but a moral and epistemic structure regulating the natural and human order. Whenever balance collapses\u0026mdash;through excess, injustice, or neglect\u0026mdash;both ecological and social corruption emerge.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec30\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.4. The Human\u0026ndash;Environment Relationship in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;an defines the human\u0026ndash;environment relationship through a three-stage ethical evolution:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eDefinition\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eHumanity is appointed as a steward (khalīfah) on earth (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 2:30).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrial: Environmental resources are presented as a moral test \u0026mdash; \u0026ldquo;That He may test which of you is best in deed.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 18:7).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccountability: Humans will be held responsible for their use of natural blessings \u0026mdash; \u0026ldquo;Then you will surely be asked that Day about pleasure.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 102:8).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis triadic structure reflects the principle of environmental trusteeship, where ownership is conditional upon moral accountability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccordingly, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic economy is a circular and regenerative system, grounded in moderation:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Eat and drink, but do not waste; indeed, He does not love the wasteful.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 7:31)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec31\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.5. Emergence of Maqāṣid-Based Sustainability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA major outcome of this study is the articulation of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, integrating the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis synthesis reflects the Qur\u0026rsquo;an\u0026rsquo;s holistic vision of justice, where environmental degradation is both a physical and moral crisis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Corruption has appeared on land and sea because of what people\u0026rsquo;s hands have earned.\u0026rdquo; (Qur\u0026rsquo;an 30:41)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHence, ecological imbalance is not a random occurrence but a moral rupture within the ethical order.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;anic model redefines sustainability as a moral and spiritual duty, transforming environmental care into an act of worship and social justice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec32\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.6. Qur\u0026rsquo;an-Based Indicators of Sustainability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the synthesis of textual and semantic data, three foundational indicators for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) emerge:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabd\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndicator\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQur\u0026rsquo;anic Basis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Justice Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 59:7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeasures fairness in wealth and resource distribution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Trust Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 33:72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluates human fidelity to the stewardship trust\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental Reform Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Q. 7:56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssesses effectiveness of efforts in restoring ecological balance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese indicators establish a normative and measurable link between ethical values and environmental policy, offering an Islamic framework for sustainability assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.7. Statistical Relationships among Core Concepts\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorrelation analysis shows that:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is a strong positive correlation (r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.82) between balance (al-Mīzān) and reform (iṣlāḥ), indicating that reform serves as the operational mechanism of balance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is a negative correlation (r = \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.76) between balance (al-Mīzān) and corruption (fasād), reflecting their structural opposition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese relationships demonstrate that ethical behavior directly influences ecological stability, validating the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic principle that moral imbalance leads to environmental decay.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec34\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.8. Overall Synthesis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Qur\u0026rsquo;an thus presents a three-dimensional environmental model integrating:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthics \u0026ndash; the cultivation of moral awareness and accountability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutions \u0026ndash; the translation of ethical values into socio-economic mechanisms (zakāt, waqf, prohibition of waste).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCivilization \u0026ndash; the redefinition of development as reform of the earth rather than its exploitation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this integrative vision, al-Mīzān emerges as the epistemic and ethical nucleus of Islamic environmental economics \u0026mdash; merging faith with reason, morality with governance, and economy with ecology.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental preservation, therefore, is not a policy option but an existential obligation, a manifestation of divine justice and human purpose.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"7. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study has demonstrated that the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic concept of al-Mīzān (the Balance) represents far more than a theological metaphor; it is a comprehensive framework that unites ethics, economics, and ecology within a single moral order. Through an integrated quantitative\u0026ndash;qualitative analysis of 315 Qur\u0026rsquo;anic verses, the research revealed that environmental consciousness in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an develops historically\u0026mdash;from moral awareness in the Meccan phase to institutional governance in the Medinan phase\u0026mdash;reflecting a divine pedagogy of transformation that links value, law, and civilization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the heart of this progression lies the principle of balance, which functions as both an ontological law and a moral discipline. The Qur\u0026rsquo;an presents sustainability not as a modern invention but as a perennial duty grounded in divine justice and human responsibility. This duty manifests in three interdependent dimensions:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthical balance \u0026ndash; regulating desire and consumption through moderation and gratitude.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic balance \u0026ndash; ensuring fairness in resource distribution and production systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEcological balance \u0026ndash; maintaining harmony within creation as an act of worship and stewardship.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research introduced the paradigm of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, integrating the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as dual objectives of the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This framework bridges the spiritual and material dimensions of life, transforming environmental ethics from abstract principles into measurable and applicable governance models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom this synthesis emerged a set of proposed Qur\u0026rsquo;an-based sustainability indicators\u0026mdash;environmental justice, trust, and reform\u0026mdash;laying the groundwork for a future Maqāṣid Sustainability Index (MSI) that aligns moral accountability with policy evaluation. Such an index could serve as a strategic tool for Muslim-majority countries to assess their performance in uniting economic growth with ecological preservation under a value-centered paradigm.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic model offers an epistemological alternative to secular environmental theories. While modern frameworks such as Daly\u0026rsquo;s ecological economics or Raworth\u0026rsquo;s Doughnut model focus on equilibrium and planetary limits, the Qur\u0026rsquo;an situates these within a teleological context of divine trust (amānah)\u0026mdash;explaining not only how to sustain life, but why. It thus completes the missing moral dimension of sustainability by restoring the spiritual foundation of justice, compassion, and restraint.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn essence, the study reaffirms that the path to environmental renewal begins with ethical reform, not merely technical solutions. The Qur\u0026rsquo;anic law of balance (al-Mīzān) reminds humanity that ecological harmony is inseparable from moral integrity: to restore the earth, we must first restore ourselves.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Statements and Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e: The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Approval\u003c/strong\u003e: This research was approved by the Scientific Committee of the Public Law and Political Science Laboratory, Faculty of Law, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco (approval date: January 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed Consent\u003c/strong\u003e: Not applicable, as this research did not involve human participants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e: Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e: The author conceptualized, analyzed, and wrote the manuscript in full.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical trial number\u003c/strong\u003e: Not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Publish declaration\u003c/strong\u003e: Not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAl-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAl-Qaradawi, Y. (1995). Fiqh al-Bīʾa fī al-Islām [Environmental Jurisprudence in Islam]. Cairo: Dar al-Shorouk.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAli, M., \u0026amp; Suleiman, N. (2021). Islamic environmental ethics and sustainable development: A maqasid al-shariah perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(4), 567\u0026ndash;585. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2020-0085\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChapra, M. U. (2000). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDaly, H. E., \u0026amp; Farley, J. (2011). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHassan, A., \u0026amp; Lewis, M. K. (2020). Towards a sustainable Islamic finance framework. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 6(2), 1\u0026ndash;19.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIqbal, M., \u0026amp; Mirakhor, A. (2013). Economic Development and Islamic Finance. Washington, DC: The World Bank.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKamali, M. H. (2016). The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam: The Qur\u0026rsquo;anic Principle of Wasatiyyah. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNasr, S. H. (1968). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. London: Allen \u0026amp; Unwin.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRaworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: W. W. Norton \u0026amp; Company.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Global Environment Outlook 7: Sustainable Planet for All. Nairobi: United Nations.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZaman, A. (2019). Islamic Economics: A Short History. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"cosmic balance, maqāṣid-based sustainability, Islamic environmental economy, environmental corruption in the Qur’an, Islamic environmental governance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study constructs a comprehensive Qur\u0026rsquo;anic economic vision of environmental sustainability through the principle of al-Mīzān (the Balance) \u0026mdash; presented in the Qur\u0026rsquo;an as the universal law regulating the relationship between humankind, nature, and resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUsing an integrated mixed quantitative\u0026ndash;qualitative methodology, the research identifies 315 verses related to environment, stewardship (istikhlāf), and reform (iṣlāḥ), tracing their chronological development across the Meccan and Medinan periods.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings reveal that 72% of the verses addressing balance and corruption belong to the Medinan phase, indicating a historical transition from moral exhortation to institutional legislation, and from individual responsibility to collective environmental governance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBuilding upon this evolution, the study introduces the concept of Maqāṣid-based Sustainability, which harmonizes the preservation of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the preservation of the environment (ḥifẓ al-bīʾa) as complementary objectives within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe paper further proposes a practical model for Islamic environmental economics, grounded in three applied mechanisms:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Islamic Circular Economy \u0026ndash; promoting responsible production and consumption.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Environmental Waqf (Endowment) \u0026ndash; as a sustainable financing instrument.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Green Zakāt Fund \u0026ndash; supporting ecological justice and renewable energy initiatives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy linking ethical accountability with contemporary sustainability goals, the Qur\u0026rsquo;anic principle of al-Mīzān offers both a moral and epistemological alternative to materialist development paradigms, redefining the human\u0026ndash;nature relationship on the basis of stewardship, reform, and balanced coexistence rather than consumption and domination.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Balance and Sustainability: A Qur’anic Economic Vision of Environmental Harmony","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-05 08:38:56","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8046517/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6a539ea8-09bb-46e7-bab2-0083d548d6c7","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 5th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-17T03:39:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-05 08:38:56","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8046517","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8046517","identity":"rs-8046517","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0