Artificial intelligence in the prospective management of endometriosis: a primary tool or an auxiliary option?

article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review examines the current and potential applications of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment strategy selection for endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

The paper discusses how rapid advances in artificial intelligence are being applied to medicine, focusing on prospective management of endometriosis and evaluating whether AI could function as a primary tool or mainly as an auxiliary decision aid in controversial treatment contexts. It highlights that, despite demonstrated prospects for AI in early diagnosis and prognosis, the authors identify unresolved issues regarding how to choose the most relevant treatment strategy for endometriosis for specific clinical situations. The paper frames endometriosis management as a setting where predictive models and clinical decision-making are still not fully resolved. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates artificial intelligence’s prospective role in diagnosis, prognosis, and management decision-making.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Rapid technological development has allowed the creation of artificial intelligence (AI). Currently, researchers are trying to implement its models in various fields of medicine, including gynecology. Is AI a “panacea” or merely a promising decision aid in controversial clinical situations in the management of endometriosis? Despite the demonstrated obvious prospects for using AI in both early diagnosis and prognosis of endometriosis, there are still several unresolved issues regarding the choice of the most relevant treatment strategy for endometriosis depending on the specific clinical situation. Key words: endometriosis, artificial intelligence, predictive models, dienogest
Full text 1,112 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Artificial intelligence in the prospective management of endometriosis: a primary tool or an auxiliary option? Rapid technological development has allowed the creation of artificial intelligence (AI). Currently, researchers are trying to implement its models in various fields of medicine, including gynecology. Is AI a “panacea” or merely a promising decision aid in controversial clinical situations in the management of endometriosis? Despite the demonstrated obvious prospects for using AI in both early diagnosis and prognosis of endometriosis, there are still several unresolved issues regarding the choice of the most relevant treatment strategy for endometriosis depending on the specific clinical situation. Key words: endometriosis, artificial intelligence, predictive models, dienogest For citation: Orazov M.R., Radzinsky V.E., Dolgov E.D. Artificial intelligence in the prospective management of endometriosis: a primary tool or an auxiliary option? Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2025; 24(2): 153–158. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678 2025-2-153-158

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:54:30.111693+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-08T06:39:30.753600+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK