Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Changes Face of Landuse on Urban Wetland: Acase Study of Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal (India)

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study analyzed Landsat satellite imagery from 1991-2021 to show that rapid urbanization in Berhampore Municipality, India, has led to a continuous decline in wetland areas and a corresponding increase in built-up areas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This preprint studied how rapid, unplanned urbanization and associated land-use/land-cover changes have affected urban wetlands in Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal, using Landsat satellite imagery (1991–2021) and multiple remote-sensing indices (including Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index, and Normalized Difference Built-up Area Index, plus pond and turbidity-related indices). The authors report that wetland area continuously declined over time while built-up area continuously increased from the urban core toward the fringe. A major caveat stated is that the work is a preprint that has not been peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Wetlands play a vital role in environmental protection. Wetland works not only as kidney of environment but also they provide us water storage, urban flood control, recharge of groundwater, water purifications, agricultural facilities, wildlife resource management, and recreation spots. In present day rapid unplanned urbanization process is shooting low risky high profitable zone wetland areas because of huge amount population pressure in urban sector and lack of awareness about environmental protection. Berhampore town is one of the important towns which is located in the Murshidabad district of West Bengal and express rapid urban growth. Because of the rapid unplanned urban growth land use and land cover are changing very rapidly within very short time gap which may impacts on the local land resources. Through this paper we want to show the present day scenario of Wetlands in municipality area, how wetlands are affected by unplanned urbanization directly or indirectly with the help of landuse landcover change, we are also using some indices to summarized present actual relation between wetland and built up area. To find out the present scenario wetland and built up area of Berhampore town Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Built up Area Index, Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Pond Index and Normalized Difference Turbidity Index etc have been used with the help of Landsat Satellite images(TM and OLI-TIRS sensor) from 1991 to 2021 .This study express that amount area of wetland are continuous declining over time and amount areas of built up areas are continuous increased form urban core to fringe area. Water is most precious to all over the world but due to endless demands of people they forget the ethical manners of human beings. This study will throw a new enlighten on the study of urban wetland status.
Full text 320,627 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Changes Face of Landuse on Urban Wetland: Acase Study of Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal (India) | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Changes Face of Landuse on Urban Wetland: Acase Study of Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal (India) Subham Kumar Roy, Chumki Mondal This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Wetlands play a vital role in environmental protection. Wetland works not only as kidney of environment but also they provide us water storage, urban flood control, recharge of groundwater, water purifications, agricultural facilities, wildlife resource management, and recreation spots. In present day rapid unplanned urbanization process is shooting low risky high profitable zone wetland areas because of huge amount population pressure in urban sector and lack of awareness about environmental protection. Berhampore town is one of the important towns which is located in the Murshidabad district of West Bengal and express rapid urban growth. Because of the rapid unplanned urban growth land use and land cover are changing very rapidly within very short time gap which may impacts on the local land resources. Through this paper we want to show the present day scenario of Wetlands in municipality area, how wetlands are affected by unplanned urbanization directly or indirectly with the help of landuse landcover change, we are also using some indices to summarized present actual relation between wetland and built up area. To find out the present scenario wetland and built up area of Berhampore town Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Built up Area Index, Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Pond Index and Normalized Difference Turbidity Index etc have been used with the help of Landsat Satellite images(TM and OLI-TIRS sensor) from 1991 to 2021 .This study express that amount area of wetland are continuous declining over time and amount areas of built up areas are continuous increased form urban core to fringe area. Water is most precious to all over the world but due to endless demands of people they forget the ethical manners of human beings. This study will throw a new enlighten on the study of urban wetland status. Berhampore town Landuse & landcover change Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index Normalized Difference Built up Area Index Normalized Difference Turbidity Index Normalized Difference Wetland Index Urbanization Wetland Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Introduction Wetlands are permanently or seasonally water-saturated on land areas with a fundamental hydrologic landscape unit where perennial water lies on shallow or deep trench. According to US Fish and Wildlife Service (1979) – Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water level is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. Wetlands not only maintain the ecological balance rather they also maintain flood control, increase the rate of ground water recharge, flourish aquaculture and also help to developed good recreational sector etc. Wetlands are one of the crucial natural resources on the earth surface which helps to support rich species diversity. Wetland is a generic term for water bodies of various types, and includes diverse hydrological entities, named as, marshes, swamps, bogs, wet meadows, potholes, and river overflow lands (Tiner, 1999) . Somehow, wetland controls the surface run-off from moving swiftly or overflowing the river banks. Due to their massive or numerous functionality sometime wetlands are described as “the kidneys of the landscape” in hydrological and chemical cycle as the downstream section receives wastes from both natural and human sources (De & Jana, 1997). Now-a-days wetlands have been analyzed as “biological supermarkets” for their extensive food webs and rich biodiversity support ( Mitsch & Gosselink, 1993) . Wetlands also have an ecologically sensitive and adaptive system (Turner et al., 2000) it was the most productive ecosystem on the earth's surface (Ghermandi et al., 2008) . Wetlands consist of diversity according to their geographical location, nature, dominated by flora and fauna species, soil and sediment properties (Space Application Centre, 2010). Lack of conformity among government policies and human awareness in the field of nature conservation, it is one of the most important reason for the deterioration of water bodies in the field of planning (Turner et al., 2000, Bassi et al., 2014). According to landscape approach that allows to consideration of the results of environmental, economic, and social systems in time and space and the more general process of ‘‘environ-mental bio-diversification’’ which are influences on up gradation of environmental resources ( Agnoletti 2015 ).There are also people continue to depend on locally available bio-resources for their livelihoods, such population who are directly dependent on local biological resources. Through their keen sense of observation, practices, and experimentation developed and established a body of knowledge that is passed on from generation to generation. Some are widespread traditional knowledge like cultivation practices. Wetland ecosystems are triggered by the lack of good governance and management. T.V. Ramachandra, (2001) has worked on the issue of restoration and management strategies of wetlands in developing countries in the context of world and Indian scenario. Ritesh Kumar, (2010) has stressed upon the management plan for east Kolkata wetlands. Manojit Paul, Mukti Chanda and Supriya Sengupta have played a pioneering role in conducting a survey to assess the strategy and scenario for wetland conservation in India. The Ramsar Convention on wetlands in 1971(2010) has a definite mission as ―the conservation and wise use of all wetlands through local, regional and national actions and international cooperation, as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development throughout the world. In 2013, 163 nations have joined together to include another 2060 wetlands around the world in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. The Ramsar Convention Manual, 6th edition has outlined the definition of wetlands, its values and conservation strategies. It has mentioned wetland as one of the most important ecosystem of world which is in the verge of degradation. So, we need to protect the wetlands at any cost. In India, the rapidly growing human population, land use alteration, improper use of watersheds has caused a substantial decline in wetlands resources throughout the country. Anthropogenic pressures are posing a serious threat to the survival of wetland ecosystem. A collaborated research involving natural, social, and inter-disciplinary study, which aims at understanding the various components, monitoring of water quality, economic valuation, biodiversity, and other activities as an indispensable tool for formulating an effective and long term conservation strategies on wetland management (Kiran et al. 1999) . Those publications stressed a wide approach to wetlands conservation and suggested several desirable solutions, all of which have been taken into account for future wetland research in Berhampore municipality. The foregoing literature analysis clearly depicts the current state of wetlands in India and around the world. However, in the case of identifying research needs, micro-scale wetland-related research in the Murshidabad area has yet to be completed at a suitable scale. We classified inland wetland groups in our study region during the research process (Table 1.1 ). Schuyt & Brander (2004) describe four types of functions performed by wetlands: Regulation function - Wetlands regulate ecological processes that contribute to a healthy environment (recycling nutrients, ground water recharge etc.). Carrier functions - Wetlands provide space for activities such as cultivation, energy production and habitat for animals. Production functions - Wetlands also provide resources for people (food, water, raw materials etc.) to sustain their life. Information functions - Wetlands contribute to control mental stability by providing scientific and spiritual values. According to US Millennium Ecosystem Assessment report says that the level of degradation of wetland is higher than the other ecosystem in the world, that’s why society needs human awareness about wetland conversation and various necessary measures also had been taken to control present day scenario. Wetlands are classified in various category. Schoot are classified into five categories that’s are - Estuaries – Where rivers meet the sea and salinity is intermediate between salt and freshwater, such as deltas, mudflats, salt marshes etc. Marine – It is influenced by river flows such as shorelines and coral reefs etc. Riverine – It is generally found along the perennial river such as oxbow lake, water meadows etc. Lacustrine – That areas covered with permanent water with slight flow such as pond, lakes etc. Constructed – That wetland is an artificial wetland to treat by local government or industrial waste water or storm water runoff. It may also be designed for land reclamation or use as a mitigation step for natural areas lost to changing landuse pattern. Table 1.1: Classification of Wetland category in study area WETLAND CATEGORY TYPE EXAMPLE INLAND WETLAND NATURAL LAKE , POND , OX BOW LAKE, CUT OFF MEANDER, WATER LOGGED,RIVER,RIVERINE WETLAND MANMADE RESERVOIR,BARRAGE, TANK,POND, WATERLOGGED, RECREATIONAL SPOT Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.2 Objectives To evaluate how wetlands are affected by unplanned urbanization directly or indirectly with the help of spatio - temporal change. To show the major problems and some probable solutions for wetland conservation in study area. 1.3 Selection of study area The area under study is Berhampore Municipality, under Berhampore block of Murshidabad District of West Bengal. Berhampore Municipality is one of the oldest municipalities in West Bengal. Berhampore municipality was established in 1876. Geographically the area extends from 88º14’ 57” East to 88º15’50” East and from 24º04’39” North to 24º07’48” North ( Figure 1.1 ) . According to census 2011, Total area of Berhampore Municipality is 31.42 km² spread into 25 Wards. The Bhagirathi River flows across the entire west of the city from north to south. The N.H. 34 divides the city into two sections, and the Easter Railway running through the eastern section. Berhampore is the administrative, nodal, and district headquarters of the Murshidabad district. According to census of India , 2011 - Berhampore town categorized as class-1 municipality town and 7th largest city in West Bengal. This is perhaps the only municipality in the state of W.B, which is the member of IHCN (Indian Heritage Cities Network), (Sharma, 2012). It is a highly functional unit which plays a vital role to provide good urban services all over the urban territory and its surroundings. Database and Methodology 1.4.1. Materials This study leaned heavily on secondary data derived from multiple of official and non-government sources. Berhampore Municipality's ward map was obtained from the Berhampore Municipality. USGS Earth Explorer was used to retrieve Landsat images from 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021 ( Table 1.2 ). Those data have been processed in order to achieve the goals. To reduce the number of errors, cloud-free photos were used for the analysis. Ground truth verification was carried out in order to improve the study's correctness. Information on the growth and development of Berhampore town has been gathered from the Berhampore Municipality's various offices. The last matter was settled following a ground truth inspection of the wetland sites in Berhampore municipality to determine their current state. Table 1.2 Details of used Landsat data SL. NO. DATE ACQUIRED SATELLITE SENSOR WRS- PATH/ROW DATUM MAP PROJECTION 1 1991-01-24 Landsat 5/ TM 139/43 WGS 84 UTM 2 2001-01-19 Landsat 5/ TM 139/43 WGS 84 UTM 3 2011-01-31 Landsat 5/ TM 139/43 WGS 84 UTM 4 2021-02-11 Landsat 8/ OLI-TIRS 139/43 WGS 84 UTM Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.2. Image processing Pre-processing satellite images prior to change detection is critical in order to develop a more direct link between the acquired data and biophysical processes (Abd El-Kawya et al., 2011). Both remote sensing and GIS techniques were used in the assessment. Various cartographic techniques have been adopted for mapping purposes. Using MS Office Excel and SPSS software, numerous parametric statistical studies were performed to demonstrate demographic growth. Arc GIS 10.2 software has been used to derive the data and map preparation of the NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI, NDPI, and NDTI indexes. 1.4.3. Image classification After that, supervised image classification methods are used to classify the pre-processed images. The maximum likelihood algorithm incorporated into the Arc GIS application will classify according to the number of classes necessary and the digital number of pixels available in the supervised classification approach. The maximum likelihood algorithm will classify the image in the supervised classification technique based on the training sets (signatures) provided by the user based on his area knowledge. The user's training data instructs the software on which types of pixels should be used for certain land cover classes. Finally, the classification yields the area's land use/land cover image. The research area is divided into four land use and land cover classes: water bodies, vegetation areas, open space, and built-up areas. 1.4.4. Supervised image classification: Supervised classification is a user-guided method that involves selecting training sites as category references (Campbell 1996 &Jensen 1996). In this technique, supervised image classification is a true procedure for recognizing spectrally comparable areas on satellite images by assigning training sites of known targets and then extracting those spectral fingerprints to other areas of unknown targets. The analyst's classifications are a three-stage procedure that includes training, classification, and output. The analyst selects training sites to reflect areas with known cover kinds during the training stage. Liveware identified links between different types of land and their spectral frequency of multiple wave lengths at this stage. The classification stage is the second step in the supervised classification process, and it involves categorizing a large number of spectral bands into precise land use and land cover categories. Maximum likelihood is the most extensively used classification algorithm. The output stage is the last step in the process. The results are presented, visualized, and interpreted using the output products. Finally, the analyst compresses the classified data into a specified group of classes and presents it in digital graphical and tabular form. The statistical parameters, accuracy assessment table, and other supporting information are included with the end product (Khorram et. al.2013). A supervised image classification system was employed in this study to demonstrate change detection across a 30-year period. In the supervised image classification, four land use and land cover (Table 1.3 ) units of the study region are represented by groups of training pixels. Using the Arc GIS (10.2) programme, each image is classified independently using the supervised image classification method with the help of maximum likelihood algorithm. Table 1.3 Land use and Land cover classes of study area. CLASSES OF IMAGE CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION WATERBODY Natural and Manmade Lake, Ox-bow and Ponds. VEGETATION AREA Deciduous Forest Lands, Gardens, Mixed Forest Lands, Roadside or Riverside vegetation areas etc. OPEN SPACE Stadium, Play Ground, Park, Recreational spot and Project area under construction. BUILTUP AREA Residential, Commercial and Services lands. Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.5. Accuracy assessment : The term 'accuracy' is often used to indicate the measure of a derived map's (classification's) 'correctness,' which is tested using an error-matrix. A significant number of remote sensing studies have focused on accuracy assessment as a key component. The accuracy assessment of change detection procedures, on the other hand, is still in the experimental stage and entails concerns such as sampling strategies that aren't commonly recognized, image registration, boundary problems, and reference data. Error matrix analysis (Khorram et al.2013) is the most often used approach for assessing accuracy (Table 1.4 ). Individual classifications are critical in the change detection procedure. As a result, a comprehensive accuracy evaluation must contain a report on overall accuracy, user accuracy, and producer accuracy, all of which were studied using the Kappa coefficient. Table 1.4 Kappa Statistics (Rwanga, 2017) SL.NO. VALUE OF K STATUS 1 < 0.0 Poor 2 0.0–0.2 Slight 3 0.21–0.4 Fair 4 0.41–0.6 Moderate 5 0.61–0.8 Good 6 0.81–1 Very good Source: Das & Sahu, 2020 Overall Accuracy = \(\frac{\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{c}\text{o}\text{r}\text{r}\text{e}\text{c}\text{t}\text{l}\text{y} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}\text{i}\text{f}\text{i}\text{e}\text{d} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{c}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} \left(\text{D}\text{i}\text{a}\text{g}\text{o}\text{n}\text{a}\text{l}\right)}{\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{r}\text{e}\text{f}\text{e}\text{r}\text{e}\text{n}\text{c}\text{e} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{c}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} }\times 100\) In a comparable way to overall accuracy, the classification performance of distinct classes is assessed. There are two methods for achieving accuracy: user accuracy and producer accuracy. The producer's accuracy is derived by dividing the total number of pixels collected from the reference data by the number of accurate pixels in one categorization. Meanwhile, the user's accuracy is determined by dividing the total number of pixels categorized in each class by the number of accurately identified pixels in that class. The accuracy of the user assesses the commission error and shows the likelihood that a pixel categorized into a particular category represents that class on the ground. The following formula is used to calculate the accuracy of the user and the producer: User Accuracy = \(\frac{\text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{c}\text{o}\text{r}\text{r}\text{e}\text{c}\text{t}\text{l}\text{y} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}\text{i}\text{f}\text{i}\text{e}\text{d} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} \text{i}\text{n} \text{e}\text{a}\text{c}\text{h} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s} }{\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}\text{i}\text{f}\text{i}\text{e}\text{d} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{c}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} \text{i}\text{n} \text{t}\text{h}\text{a}\text{t} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s} \left(\text{T}\text{h}\text{e} \text{R}\text{o}\text{w} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l}\right)}\times 100\) Producer Accuracy = \(\frac{\text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{c}\text{o}\text{r}\text{r}\text{e}\text{c}\text{t}\text{l}\text{y} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}\text{i}\text{f}\text{i}\text{e}\text{d} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{c}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} \text{i}\text{n} \text{e}\text{a}\text{c}\text{h} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}}{\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s}\text{i}\text{f}\text{i}\text{e}\text{d} \text{p}\text{i}\text{x}\text{c}\text{e}\text{l}\text{s} \text{i}\text{n} \text{t}\text{h}\text{a}\text{t} \text{c}\text{l}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s} \left(\text{T}\text{h}\text{e} \text{C}\text{o}\text{l}\text{u}\text{m}\text{n} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l}\right)}\times 100\) The Kappa coefficient (K) is another study indicator that is used to determine the study's level of relevance. Kappa has a value of 0 to 1, with 0 denoting agreement based only on chance. A number of 1 indicates that the two data sets are in full agreement. Although negative values are possible, they are erroneous. The Kappa statistic is a more complicated measure of classifier agreement that is better at differentiating between classes than total accuracy. The Kappa Coefficient equation was used to determine if the values in an error matrix represent a result that is significantly better than random (Congalton, 1991) or to determine if the values in an error matrix represent a result that is significantly better than random (Jensen and Cowen, 1999). (K) = \(\frac{(\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e}-\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{c}\text{o}\text{r}\text{r}\text{e}\text{c}\text{t}\text{e}\text{d} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e})- {\Sigma }(\text{C}\text{o}\text{l}\text{u}\text{m}\text{n} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \times \text{R}\text{o}\text{w} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l})}{\left(\text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e}\right)2- {\Sigma }(\text{C}\text{o}\text{l}\text{u}\text{m}\text{n} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \times \text{R}\text{o}\text{w} \text{T}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l}) }\times 100\) Table 1.5 Summary of Accuracy Assessment from 1991 to 2021 LAND USE / LAND COVER CLASS 1991 2001 2011 2021 USER'S ACCURACY PRODUCER'S ACCURACY USER'S ACCURACY PRODUCER'S ACCURACY USER'S ACCURACY PRODUCER'S ACCURACY USER'S ACCURACY PRODUCER'S ACCURACY WATERBODY 0.833 0.88 0.8 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 VEGETATION 0.8 0.75 0.81 0.76 0.8 0.85 0.8 0.85 OPEN AREA 0.83 0.76 0.87 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 BUILTUP AREA 0.76 0.81 0.83 0.86 0.9 0.85 0.9 0.85 OVERALL ACCURACY 0.8 0.95 0.85 0.85 KAPPA 0.74 0.92 0.81 0.81 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 The overall accuracy of 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021 (Table 1.5 ) was found to be 0.8, 0.95, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively. In this study, producer and user accuracy ranges from 0.75 to 0.88, 0.76 to 0.83 in 1991, 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.8 to 0.87 in 2001, 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.8 to 0.87 in 2011, producer and user accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.88 and 0.8 to 0.9 in 2011, and 0.83 to 0.88 and 0.8 to 0.9 in 2021. In 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021, the classification's Kappa coefficients were 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively. According to Rwanga's classification scale (Table 1.4 ), the classification ranges from good to very good from 1991 to 2021. 1.4.6. Method for calculating NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI,NDPI and NPTI statistical assessment: To illustrate the relationship between built-up area and water content of different indices were calculated using Landsat data with the help of GIS software Arc GIS as NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index), NDBI (Normalized Difference Built-up Index), MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index),NDPI (Normalized Difference Pond Index) and NDTI (Normalized Difference Turbidity Index) respectively. 1.4.6.1. NDWI: The NDWI Index (Normalized Difference Water Index) is a satellite image visual indicator that is primarily utilised for remote sensing measures, particularly open surface water body mapping. For the most part, two bands have been utilised to calculate the NDWI Index. Green Band and Near Infrared are the two options. It's constantly between − 1 and + 1. Table 1.6 assists in the classification of the study area's NDWI. NDWI INDEX = \(\frac{GREEN-NIR}{GREEN+NIR }\) Where, in Landsat 5 TM, the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52–0.60 µm) and the NIR band indicates Band 4 (0.77–0.90 µm) and in Landsat 8 OLI - TIRS, the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53–0.59 µm) and the NIR band indicates Band 5 (0.85–0.88 µm).That the positive values of NDWI are assumed to represent water surfaces, while the negative values are assumed to be non-water surfaces (McFeeters,1996). Table 1.6 Index values for NDBI. CATEGORIES VALUE LOW 0.01 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.6.2. NDBI: NDBI Index (Normalized Difference Builtup Index) is another useful graphical indicator, which is for measuring the urban areas specially built up areas or artificial structure. It ranges from − 1 to + 1, with negative values indicating water bodies and vegetation cover in the earth surface, low positive values indicating barren soil types and positive values indicating built-up areas. NDBI helps to measures that the rate of urbanization. Table 1.7 assists in the classification of the study area's NDBI. NDBI INDEX = \(\frac{\text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R}- \text{N}\text{I}\text{R}}{\text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R}+ \text{N}\text{I}\text{R}}\) Where, in Landsat 5 TM, the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55–1.75µm) and the NIR band indicates Band 4 (0.76–0.90 µm); in Landsat 8 OLI, the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57–1.65 µm) and the NIR band indicates Band 5 (0.85–0.88 µm). This index is mainly used for the mapping of constructional area where a positive value indicates the presence of artificial structure or manmade structure and the lower value indicates the availability of natural features existing on earth surface. Table 1.7 Index values for NDBI. CATEGORIES VALUE LOW 0.3 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.6.3. MNDWI: MNDBI Index (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index) is another pictorial representation, which is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from − 1 to + 1, (Xu, 2006) to reduce the urban noise in the delineation of water bodies. Table 1.8 assists in the classification of the study area's MNDWI. MNDWI INDEX = \(\frac{\text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}- \text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R}}{\text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}+ \text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R}}\) Where, in Landsat 5 TM, the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52–0.60 µm) and the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55–1.75µm) and in Landsat 8 OLI - TIRS, the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53–0.59 µm) and the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57–1.65 µm). Due to growing values of water features and lowering values of built-up land from positive to negative, the MNDWI's contrast between water and built-upland will be significantly widened. Increased water enhancement in the MNDWI-image will result in more accurate extraction of open water features, as built-up land, soil, and vegetation all have negative values and are thus significantly muted, if not completely deleted (Xu,2006). Table 1.8 Index values for MNDWI. CATEGORIES VALUE LOW 0.01 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.6.4. NDPI: NDPI Index (Normalized Difference Pond Index) is another graphical indicator, used for the enhancement of open water features. It also helps to the pond area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from − 1 to + 1. Table 1.9 assists in the classification of the study area's MNDWI. NDPI INDEX = \(\frac{\text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R}- \text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}}{ \text{S}\text{W}\text{I}\text{R} +\text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}}\) Where, in Landsat 5 TM, the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55–1.75µm) and the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52–0.60 µm) and Landsat 8 OLI – TIRS, the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57–1.65 µm) and the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53–0.59 µm). When combined with NDVI, the NDPI provides greater distinction between aquatic and wetland vegetation and typical vegetation than the NDVI alone. This representation has significantly improved the results, particularly for small and shallow water bodies, and it now contains all edge pixels of water bodies that can be visually distinguished from the image. The threshold values for various factors change depending on the soil background and are implemented as a set of conditions. Table 1.9 Index values for NDPI CATEGORIES VALUE LOW 0.1 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.6.5. NDTI: NDTI Index (Normalized Difference Turbidity Index) is another imagistic indicator, used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from − 1 to + 1. Table 1.10 assists in the classification of the study area's MNDWI. NDTI INDEX = \(\frac{\text{R}\text{E}\text{D}- \text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}}{ \text{R}\text{E}\text{D} +\text{G}\text{R}\text{E}\text{E}\text{N}}\) Where, in Landsat 5 TM, the Red band indicates Band 3 (0.63–0.69 µm) and the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52–0.60 µm) and Landsat 8 OLI – TIRS the Red band indicates Band 4 (0.64 − 0.67 µm) and the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53–0.59 µm). The availability of suspended particles in the water has increased turbidity levels, with the red band reflecting more than the green band (Islam et.al., 2006). The NDTI allows for the identification of water with a high turbidity (poor clarity) (Lacaux et al., 2007). This spectral characteristic of turbid water has been captured in Lacaux's Normalized Difference Turbidity Index, which can be used to detect turbid water pixels. Based on a study of sensor data in the scenario of severely turbid water bodies when the value is larger than + 0.25. Table 1.10 Index values for NDTI. CATEGORIES VALUE LOW 0.02 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 1.4.7. STATISTICAL MEASURES: Correlation analysis is a form of statistical analysis which allows researchers to explore the degree of association between independent and dependent variables (Schober & Schwarte, 2018 ; Senthilnathan,2019). r = \(\frac{\sum (Xi- \stackrel{-}{\text{x}} )(\text{Y}\text{i}-\stackrel{-}{\text{y}})}{\sqrt{{\left(Xi- \stackrel{-}{\text{x}} \right)}^{2}\sum }{(\text{Y}\text{i}-\stackrel{-}{\text{y}})}^{2}}\) where, ‘r’ is the Pearson products moment correlation coefficient, ‘x i ’ is values of x variable in a sample, ‘ \(\stackrel{-}{\text{x}}\) i ’ mean of values of x variable, y i is the value of y variable in the sample, and ‘ \(\stackrel{-}{\text{y}}\) i ’ is mean values of y variable. To demonstrate the impacts of the NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI, NDPI, and NDTI, scatter plots were created using regression analysis with all time-points from 1991 to 2021. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC) measures the direction and strength of the relationship between two variables, while regression analysis describes the functional relationship between variables independent (x) and dependent (y) (Härdle & Vieu, 1992; Zhao, 2013). Linear regression is used to ascertain the impact of several numbers of independent variables, X 1 , X 2 , X 3 …X i on a single dependent variable y Symbolically. y = β 0 + x 1 β 1+… x p β p + Ɛ Where, ‘β’ reflects how much of an effect x has on y, and ‘Ɛ’ is the error term. Result 1.5.1. Population growth: In the latter half of Eighteenth century, for observing the Nawabai activity, a military camp was formed in ‘ Brahmapur mouza’ . Mr. Beveridge wrote about Brahmapur in his book Old places of Murshidabad ,Calcutta Reviewed,1892. Due to pronunciation this Brahmapur was later renamed as Berhampore . After the battle of Palashi ,1757 and the battle of Mir Qashim,1763 , the construction of cantonment has started at Brahmapur mouza to keep an eye on Nawabi activities. According to Hunter , that cantonment was completed in 1767 and the chief architect was A.Campbell. The city of Berhampore was formed around this cantonment. As per State Paper Report 1858 by Sir Frederick James Haliday (British Civil Servant & first Lieutenant Governor of Bengal) – states that the Sipoy revolt, 1857 that started across all over India started in Brahmapur Cantonment. After that the cantonment was demolished in 1870. King Thibaut of Burma was defeated and taken prisoner during the third Ingo – Burmese war. This old town was famous for silk production due to these factor Armenian merchants was come to this famous town nearly 1665. The French mansion was built in 1668. Due to Bhagharathi River course shifting that area remarked as a famous trading center and nodal point for business purposes. Berhampore Municipality was established in 1876 which had 16.19 sq.km occupied area (Roy et al., 2021). In the very beginning, the British Government did not leave the governance of this municipality completely in the hand of Non Government folks as after Sipoy Mutiny in 1857, a large number British army people stayed at Berhamopore Cantonment area. Therefore the Municipality was constituted with both the government and non government peoples. The municipal board was constituted by, 14 non-governmental members and 5 government nominated members, total 19 members. This trend was continued up to 1884.The District Magistrate acted as the President of the Municipality during this tenure. In the year 1884, according to “Bengal Municipal Act 1876”, finally the Administration and management of Berhampore Municipality was handed over to 14 elected and 5 governments nominated members. The first Chairman of Berhampore Municipality was Ray Bahadur Baikunthanath Sen, who was a reputed Advocate and the President of District Bar Association as well. That time the area of Berhampore Municipality was divided into 6 wards i.e. 1) Gorabazar 2) Cantonment 3) Berhampore 4) Khagra 5) Saidabad and 6) Cossimbazar. The numbers of elected members from each ward were as follows, 3 from Gorabazar,1 from Cantonment,4 from Berhampore ,3 from Khagra,2 from Saidabad and 1 member from Cossimbazar ward. It is the district head quarter of Murshidabad ( http://www.berhamporemunicipality.org.in/ ). Figure 1.2 showing the continuous population growth in Berhampore municipality from 1901 to 2011 with R 2 value demarked as highly positive population growth. Now the Municipality is comprised of 25 wards and one elected member from each ward. Total area of this municipality is 31.42 sq.km. and it has a population of 1,95,223 (Census,2011). In year 1901 the population was 24397 and it becomes 55613 in year 1951. But after 1971, the population growth rate of this municipality is going higher. The town is primarily a service town having a population of 1,95,223 as per 2011 census, with an overall population density 6213 persons per sq km. The decadal growth rate over the last five decades varies from 16.51 to 36.12. Highest decadal growth had been founded in 2001 census which was recorded as 36.12 and present decadal growth is 21.91 in 2011 census. In that case we found a negative decadal growth according to their value because high price of land in municipal area, trafficking as a common problem, so lots of people come and settled down surrounding the municipal area to ensure the uses of all urban services from their locality. Within a decade numbers of census towns are increased from 3 to 9 surrounding Berhampore municipality in 2001 census we found that Kasim Bazar, Gora Bazar and Goaljan but in 2011 rest of three more six census town has been added those are Banjetia, Sibdanga badarpur, Gopjan, Chaltia, Haridasmati and Ajodhyanagar. Those nine census towns are well bonded the municipality allover direction. Surrounded villages are converted into urban space within a very short time. 1.5.1.2. Degree of urbanization : The degree of urbanization generally refers to the relative or absolute number of people who live in places defined as urban (Kundu, 2013). Degree of Urbanization = \(\frac{Urban Population}{Total Population}*100\) = (195223 / 446887)*100 = 43.68 1.5.1.3. Speed of Urbanization : This index shows the annual rate of change in the number of population in the town (Kundu, 2013). Speed of Urbanization = \(\frac{(X-Y)}{Y}\) * 100 [where, X = Present Census year Population = {(195223 − 160143)/160143}*100 Y = Previous Census year Population] = 21.90 1.5.1.4. Population Projection : It is an estimate of a future population. It is fraught with uncertainties as there is no fixed law of population increment and various techniques of projections are to give a generalized result (Mandal, 2000). It is a sign of economic development and cultural advancement of an urban center (Roy et al.,2021). Population Projection: 2011 census = 195223, 2001 census = 160143 r = (195223–160143) = 35080 P.2021 = 2011 + (r* 10) = 546023 P.2031 = 896823 P.2041 = 1052400 1.5.2. LULC One of the most significant processes related to the deterioration of the earth’s natural ecosystem have been regarded by Land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics. Rapid urbanization has become a key challenge for the future urban sustainability. LULC maps of Berhampore town highlighting the spatial distribution of land use and land cover areas based on the images from 1991 to 2021. The below figures ( Fig. 1.3 ) illustrate the fact that there was a significant difference in the land use and land cover among the North-Western, South, and South Western parts of the Berhampore municipality area. Changing land characteristics from one to over time due to human-induced transformation activities were referred to as land use and land cover transformation. Land features are in a constant state of transition from one type to another, based on local environmental suitability and local people’s requirements. Table 1.11 Area under different LULC in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 LULC CLASSIFICATION AREA COVER LULC CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % Area (Sq.Km.) % WATERBODY 3.64 11.58 1.72 5.47 0.78 2.48 0.62 1.97 -1.92 -6.11 -0.94 -2.99 -0.16 -0.51 -3.02 -9.61 VEGETATION 15.18 48.31 9.48 30.17 8.7 27.68 6.18 19.69 -5.7 -18.14 -0.78 -2.49 -2.52 -7.99 -9 -28.62 OPEN AREA 2.14 6.81 1.34 4.26 0.95 3.02 2.02 6.42 -0.8 -2.55 -0.39 -1.24 1.07 3.4 -0.12 -0.39 BUILTUP AREA 10.46 33.29 18.88 60.08 20.99 66.8 22.6 71.92 8.42 26.79 2.11 6.72 1.61 5.12 12.14 38.63 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 LULC types (vegetation cover, and water body ) shows decreasing trends, and rest of two other LULC types built up area show increasing trends but in case of open area highlight the feature continuous decreasing trend from 1991 to 2011 but in 2021 it becomes positive change ( Table 1.11 ) . The statistical result indicates that the most land in Berhampore municipality was covered by built up area; 33.29% in 1991, 60.08% in 2001, 66.8% in 2011 and 71.92% in 2021 followed and vegetation 48.31% in 1991, 30.17% in 2001, 27.68% in 2011and 19.69% in 2021, another special land cover feature of lulc map is waterbody 11.58% in 1991, 5.47%in 2001,2.48% in 2011 and 1.97% in 2021. The greatest decline was found for vegetation; a total number of 28.62% of area of vegetation cover loss after that waterbody also decline with 9.61% of its own area and maximum agglomeration of built up area nearly 38.63% of area were observed in Berhampore municipality area during the study period. Land use land cover classification was done in the study area under the supervised classification method using maximum likelihood algorithm. On the basis of the number of pixels, the area of each class was calculated. Based on the land use land cover map of 1991 ( Table 1.11 ) the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 11.58% (3.64 sq.km.), vegetation cover 48.31% (15.18 sq.km.), open area 6.81% (2.14 sq.km.) and built up area 33.29% ( 10.46 sq.km.). In the land use land cover map of 2001 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 5.47% (1.72 sq.km.), vegetation cover 30.17% (9.48 sq.km.), open area 4.26% (1.34 sq.km.) and built up area 60.08% (18.88 sq.km.). In the land use land cover map of 2011 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 2.48% (0.78sq.km.), vegetation cover 27.68% (8.7 sq.km.), open area 3.02% (0.95 sq.km.) and built up area 66.8% (20.99sq.km.) and the final land use land cover map of 2021 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 1.97% (0.62 sq.km.), vegetation cover 19.69% (6.18 sq.km.), open area 6.42% (2.02 sq.km.) and built up area 71.92% (22.6sq.km.). The dominant land use class was defined as built up area, and the land cover type was classified as vegetation cover in (Fig. 1.4 ) , which carried out the part of the dominant landuse and landcover type of the study area. 1.5.2.1. Water body In the study area water bodies mainly consists of lakes, ponds and tanks, etc. One major river Bhagirathi which is flows towards the western boundary of Berhampore municipality from north to south direction. Many tanks and ponds are also found in the region ( Fig. 1.5 ) . The area included in this category, 1991 was 3.64 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 11.58 % f the total area, 1.72 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 5.47 % in 201, 0.78 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 2.48 % in 2011of the total area and 0.62 \({km}^{2}\) , 2021 which accounts for 1.97% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of water body continuous decreases according to time nearly 3.02 \({km}^{2}\) or 9.61 percentage of area and according to R 2 value of waterbody is 0.865. As a result, it indicates the level of significance of the rate of gradually decreasing waterbody over time ( Table 1.11 ) . 1.5.2.2. Vegetation cover Dense vegetation can be observed in the East, North East and South-East parts of the region (Fig. 1.6 ) . Some patches of forest cover seen in the Central and North-West parts. The area included in this category, 1991 was 15.18 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 48.31 % f the total area, 9.48 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 30.17 % in 201, 8.7 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 27.68 % in 2011of the total area and 6.18 \({km}^{2}\) , in 2021 which accounts for 19.69% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of vegetation cover continuous decreases according to time nearly 9 \({km}^{2}\) or 28.62 percentage of area and according to R 2 value of vegetation cover is 0.89. It indicates the rate of extensive decreasement about vegetation cover within study time ( Table 1.11 ). 1.5.2.3. Open area In urban sector open space mainly identified as Stadium, Play Ground, Park, Recreational spot and Project area under construction. The area included in this category, 1991 was 2.14 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 6.81 % f the total area, 1.34 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 4.26 % in 201, 0.95 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 3.02 % in 2011of the total area and 2.02 \({km}^{2}\) , in 2021 which accounts for 6.42% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of open area continuous decreases according to time from 1991 to 2011 but in the year of 2021 it turns on positive growth (Table 1.11 ) . Generally natural open area mainly helps for recreational and ground water infiltration process but the passage of times this natural open area also converted urban sector and few of them remain static (Fig. 1.7 ) . According to R 2 value of open area is 0.03. So it is indicate the low positive value and show its significant level of complexness of open area within study time. 1.5.2.4. Built-up area In urban sector builtup area mainly identify as Residential, Commercial and Services lands etc. Accordingly, the area included in this category in 1991 is 10.46 \({km}^{2}\) , which accounts for 33.29 % o the total area, 18.88 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 60.08 % in 201, 20.99 \({km}^{2}\) which accounts for 66.8 % of the otal area, and 22.6 \({km}^{2}\) in 2021, which accounts for 71.92% of the total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of vegetation cover continuous increase according to time nearly 12.14 \({km}^{2}\) or 38.63 percentage of area respectively (Table 1.11 ) . The growth of Builtup area mainly transform from western part to all round the municipal area (Fig. 1.8 ) . According to R 2 value of open area is 0.84. So it is indicate the highly positive value and show significant level of development of builtup area within study time. 1.5.3. NDWI: Among the natural Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), water body is a major feature of Berhampore municipal area. Water body is mainly high in the core areas of the city which is gradually decreases towards periphery of town. Table 1.12 Area under different NDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 NDWI AREA AREA CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % % % % % < -0.16(LOW) 3.18 10.12 2.99 9.51 2.4 7.63 2.05 6.52 0.6 1.87 1.11 3.59 -0.16 - -0.07 (MEDIUM) 7.98 25.39 8.17 26 8.99 28.61 9.45 30.07 -0.6 -2.6 -1.46 -4.67 -0.07- 0.01(HIGH) 12.6 40.1 13.68 45.53 14.55 46.3 14.88 47.35 -3.43 -2.7 -1.05 -7.25 > 0.01(VERY HIGH) 7.66 24.37 6.58 20.94 5.48 17.41 5.04 16.04 3.43 3.5 1.4 8.33 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 To investigate the nature and patterns of Water body in Berhampore town, NDWI indices have been done. NDWI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDWI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table 1.12 ) are classified into four categories such as 0.01 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 10.12, 9.51, 7.63 and 6.52 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDWI values and 24.37,20.94,17.14 and 16.04 percent experiences very high NDWI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDWI are gradually decrease over the time. Table 1.13 Dispersion of NDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 YEAR MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN SD 1991 0.05 -0.28 -0.11 0.23 2001 0.04 -0.29 -0.12 0.23 2011 0.02 -0.3 -0.14 0.22 2021 0.01 -0.33 -0.16 0.24 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 From the NDWI images (Fig. 1.9 ) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table 1.13 ), it has been found that values for NDWI ranges from + 0.05 to − 0.28, 0.04 to -0.29, 0.02 to -0.3 and 0.01 to -0.33 respectively. Highest value of NDWI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc. In another hand amount of low value of NDWI are mainly found in the area of core urban space and West, North West, South West part of town (Fig. 1.9 ). It indicates that the proportion of waterbody in the city area has decreased from their mean value − 0.11 in 1991 while it decreased by − 0.16 in 2021(Fig. 1.10 ). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDWI and \({r}^{2}\) value is 0.979 that means it’s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the water cover of town. 1.5.4. NDBI Among the manmade Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), builtup area is a major feature of Berhampore municipal area. Builtup is mainly high in the core areas of the city which is gradually increases towards periphery of town in an even distribution. Table 1.14 Area under different NDBI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 NDBI AREA AREA CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % % % % % < -0.07(LOW) 11.25 35.80522 9.18 29.21706 8.05 25.62062 7.1 22.59707 6.58 3.59 3.02 13.2 -0.07 - -0.02(MEDIUM) 7.88 25.07957 8.38 26.67091 9.07 28.86696 9.47 30.14004 -1.59 -2.19 -1.27 -5.06 -0.02- 0.03(HIGH) 6.3 20.05092 7.84 24.95226 8.2 26.09803 8.35 26.57543 -4.9 -1.14 -0.47 -6.52 > 0.03 (VERY HIGH) 5.99 19.06429 6.02 19.15977 6.1 19.41439 6.5 20.68746 -0.09 -0.25 -1.27 -1.62 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 To investigate the nature and patterns of Builtup area in Berhampore town, NDBI indices have been done. NDBI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDBI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table 1.14 ) are classified into four categories such as 0.03 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 35.80, 29.21, 25.62 and 22.59 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDBI values and 19.06,19.15,19.41 and 20.68 percent experiences very high NDBI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDBI are gradually increase over the time due to their functionality. Table 1.15 Dispersion of NDBI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 YEAR MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN SD 1991 0.12 -0.22 -0.05 0.2404163 2001 0.15 -0.25 -0.05 0.2828427 2011 0.3 -0.28 0.01 0.4101219 2021 0.38 -0.3 0.04 0.4808326 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 From the NDBI images (Fig. 1.11 ) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table 1.15 ), it has been found that values for NDBI ranges from + 0.12 to − 0.22, 0.15 to -0.25, 0.3 to -0.28 and 0.38 to -0.3 respectively. Highest value of NDBI are mainly found in central part of the town such urban area available here those are Khagra, Saidabad, Gorabazar, Indropostha, Dayanagar, Cossimbazar and Kadai etc. In another hand amount of low value of NDBI are mainly found in the area of periphery urban space and East and South East part of town (Fig. 1.11 ). It indicates that the proportion of buildup area in the city area has increased from their mean value − 0.05 in 1991 while it increased by 0.04 in 2021(Fig. 1.12 ). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDBI and \({r}^{2}\) value is 0.896 that means it’s highly correlated the matter according to time increasing the rate of urban space of town. 1.5.5. MNDWI It is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. Table 1.16 Area under different MNDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 MNDWI AREA AREA CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % % % % % < -0.15(LOW) 4.68 14.89 4.8 15.27 4 12.73 3.45 10.98 -0.38 2.54 1.75 3.91 -0.15 - -0.07(MEDIUM) 14.42 45.89 19.8 63.01 21.42 68.17 23.22 73.9 -17.12 -5.16 -5.73 -28.01 -0.07- 0.01(HIGH) 9.68 30.8 4.88 15.53 4.54 14.44 3.73 11.87 15.27 1.09 2.57 18.93 > 0.01(VERY HIGH) 2.64 8.4 1.94 6.17 1.46 4.64 1.02 3.24 2.23 1.53 1.4 5.16 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 To examine the nature, patterns and accuracy of Water body in Berhampore town, MNDWI indices have been done. MNDWI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the MNDWI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table 1.16 ) are classified into four categories such as 0.01 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 14.89, 15.27, 12.73 and 10.98 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low MNDWI values and 8.4, 6.17, 4.64 and 3.24 percent experiences very high MNDWI values. It is clearly indicated the value of MNDWI are gradually decrease over the time because of main water body are remain static under supervision by Berhampore Municipality but others bill fall in a great danger because of promoting raj those wetland converted into a vertical residential project. Table 1.17 Dispersion of MNDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 YEAR MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN SD 1991 0.16 -0.26 -0.05 0.29 2001 0.15 -0.28 -0.065 0.3 2011 0.09 -0.29 -0.1 0.26 2021 0.07 -0.25 -0.09 0.22 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 From the MNDWI images (Fig. 1.13 ) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table 1.17 ), it have been found that values for MNDWI ranges from 0.16 to − 0.26, 0.15 to -0.28, 0.09 to -0.29 and 0.07 to -0.25 respectively. Highest value of MNDWI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc(Fig. 1.13 ). It indicates that the proportion of modified water body in the city area has decreased from their mean value − 0.05 in 1991 while it increased by − 0.09 in 2021 ( Fig. 1.14 ) . This diagram mainly plot of mean value of MNDWI and \({r}^{2}\) value is 0.765 that means it’s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the rate of water body in town. 1.5.6. NDPI It is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes the pond area features that are often correlated with open water. Table 1.18 Area under different NDPI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 NDPI AREA AREA CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % % % % % < -0.05(LOW) 3.02 9.61 3.68 11.71 5.01 15.94 6.2 19.73 -2.1 -4.23 -3.79 -10.12 -0.05–0.05(MEDIUM) 3.84 12.21 4.94 15.72 5.41 17.21 5.88 18.71 -3.51 -1.49 -1.5 -6.5 0.05–0.1(HIGH) 15.6 49.64 14.7 46.78 13.54 43.09 12.33 39.24 2.86 3.69 3.85 10.4 > 0.1(VERY HIGH) 8.96 28.51 8.1 25.77 7.46 23.74 7.01 22.31 2.74 2.03 1.43 6.2 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 To evaluate the nature, patterns of Pond or Stagnant water content in Berhampore town, NDPI indices have been done. NDPI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDPI I index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 ( Table 1.18 ) are classified into four categories such as 0.1 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 9.61, 11.71, 15.94 and 19.73 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDPI values and 28.51, 25.77, 23.74 and 22.31 percent experiences very high NDPI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDPI are gradually decrease over the time because unplanned rapid urbanization. Table 1.19 Dispersion of NDPI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 YEAR MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN SD 1991 0.29 -0.09 0.1 0.26 2001 0.25 -0.07 0.09 0.22 2011 0.28 -0.15 0.065 0.3 2021 0.27 -0.16 0.055 0.3 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 From the NDPI images ( Fig. 1.15 ) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table 1.19 ), it have been found that values for NDPI ranges from 0.29 to − 0.09, 0.25 to -0.07, 0.28 to -0.15 and 0.27 to -0.16 respectively. Highest value of NDPI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc ( Fig. 1.15 ) . Rest of those pond or lakes remain in great danger. Due to purpose proper urban management municipality are working with important lakes to maintain their health. It indicates that the proportion of open pond in the city area has decreased from their mean value 0.1 in 1991 while it decreased by 0.05 in 2021(Fig. 1.16 ). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDPI and \({r}^{2}\) value is 0.96 that means it’s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the rate of water body and it’s health in town because of improper management of water body all over the town. 1.5.7. NDTI As turbidity level of water increases due the increase in the suspended particles in the water, the reflectance of the red band more than that of the green band (Islam et.al., 2006).The NDTI allows the detection of high turbidity (low clarity) water cover ( Lacaux et al., 2007). Table 1.20 Area under different NDTI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 NDTI AREA AREA CHANGE 1991 2001 2011 2021 1991–2001 2001–2011 2011–2021 1991–2021 AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % AREA (Sq.Km.) % % % % % < -0.03(LOW) 1.02 3.24 1.94 6.17 2.95 9.38 3.24 10.31 -2.93 -3.21 -0.93 -7.07 -0.03–0(MEDIUM) 17.18 54.67 16.95 53.94 16.42 52.25 16.3 51.87 0.73 1.69 0.38 2.8 0–0.03(HIGH) 11.5 36.6 10.88 34.62 10.53 33.51 10.48 33.35 1.98 1.11 0.16 3.25 > 0.03(VERY HIGH) 1.72 5.47 1.65 5.25 1.52 4.83 1.4 4.45 0.22 0.42 0.38 1.02 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 To find out the turbidity nature of Pond or Stagnant water content in Berhampore town, NDTI indices have been done. NDTI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDTI I index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table 1.20 ) are classified into four categories such as 0.03 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 3.24,6.17,9.38 and 10.13percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDTI values and 5.47,5.25,4.83 and 4.45 percent experiences very high NDTI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDTI are gradually decrease over the time because of implementation of various scheme to modification drainage system. Due to this turbidity rate of main lake remain minimize. Table 1.21 Dispersion of NDTI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021 YEAR MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN SD 1991 0.03 -0.09 -0.03 0.22 2001 0.03 -0.05 -0.01 0.3 2011 0.05 -0.06 -0.005 0.26 2021 0.04 -0.04 0 0.3 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 From the NDTI images (Fig. 1.17 ) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 ( Table 1.21 ), it has been found that values for NDTI ranges from 0.03 to − 0.09, 0.03 to -0.05, 0.05 to -0.06 and 0.04 to -0.04 respectively. Highest value of NDTI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area and open space land available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, Shilpo taluk and open land surface area etc (Fig. 1.17 ). It indicates that the proportion of open pond in the city area has decreased from their mean value − 0.03 in 1991 while it increased by 0 in 2021(Fig. 1.18 ). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDTI and \({r}^{2}\) value is 0.869 that means it’s correlated the matter according to time increasing the rate of turbidity in water body and open surface in town because of improper management of water body and open surface by the process of illegal dumping of solid waste and modification of drainage system it may accelerate the process of eutrophication and environmental degradation in particular features of earth all over the town. Conclusion 'Urbanization' was defined as the dynamic growth of people in urban areas over a specific period of time. Total population of Berhampore municipality was 195223 according to census of India, 2011 and municipal area nearly was 31.42 sq.km. From the study, it has been found that water body has been decreased very fast and another path of landuse rapidly increases in urban area. NDWI maps shows that water body area is high in the peripheral areas than the central part of town areas or urban areas in 1991but due to process of human encroachments of the urban area over the waterbody. In the core of urban area some major wetland remain static which is controlled by municipality. On the other hand, NDBI index is higher towards the city areas than the outwards of city center. Loss of wetland nearly 3.02 sq.km area and 9.61 percentage of area during the study time ( Table 1.11 ) .According to Fig. 1.20 showing the rate of transformation land from waterbody to builtup area according to time, in 1991–2001 0.9sq.km.area, in 2001–2011 0.4sq.km. area and in 2011–2021 0.2 sq.km. area rapidly changed during the process of unplanned urbanization and R 2 value is 0.97 which is highly support that the event. Which was remarkable change within small city town it also triggered urban flood, ground water depletion risk in the city. Table 1.22 Pearson’s Correlations among NDWI, NDBI, NDTI, NDPI & MNDWI YEAR VARIABLE NDWI NDBI NDTI NDPI MNDWI 1991 NDWI 1 NDBI 0.17 1 NDTI -0.09 0.35 1 NDPI -0.67 0.61 0.54 1 MNDWI 0.67 -0.61 -0.54 -1 1 2001 NDWI 1 NDBI 0.14 1 NDTI -0.08 0.62 1 NDPI -0.68 0.64 0.59 1 MNDWI 0.68 -0.61 -0.59 -1 1 2011 NDWI 1 NDBI 0.1 1 NDTI 0.15 0.65 1 NDPI -0.66 0.55 0.36 1 MNDWI 0.66 -0.55 -0.36 -1 1 2021 NDWI 1 NDBI 0.5 1 NDTI -0.01 0.73 1 NDPI -0.73 0.18 0.3 1 MNDWI 0.73 -0.18 -0.3 -1 1 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 Table 1.23 Linear regression model of study variables YEAR VARIABLE R SQUARE ADJUSTED R SQUARE STANDARD ERROR F STANDARD COFFICIENT t p 1991 NDBI 0.27 0.26 0.44 33.47 0.165 5.786 0.9 NDTI 0.1 0.09 0.11 11.49 -0.98 -3.39 0.1 NDPI 0.457 0.457 0.44 107.66 -0.1 -2.8 0.5 MNDWI 0.457 0.457 0.41 106.66 0.676 31.74 0.75 2001 NDBI 0.21 0.2 0.46 25.77 0.146 5.07 0.8 NDTI 0.6 0.6 0.12 7.69 -0.8 -2.77 0.6 NDPI 0.47 0.46 0.45 102.54 -0.69 -0.17 0.9 MNDWI 0.476 0.475 0.456 100.52 0.69 32.75 0.987 2011 NDBI 0.12 0.11 0.35 14.44 0.18 3.787 0.6 NDTI 0.24 0.23 0.12 30.235 0.156 3.053 0.2 NDPI 0.443 0.443 0.37 96.28 -0.66 -31.01 0.46 MNDWI 0.44 0.44 0.37 96.3 0.66 31.01 0.56 2021 NDBI 0.25 0.25 0.32 42.86 0.506 20.51 0.575 NDTI 0.26 0.26 0.1 44.82 0.8 21 2.2 NDPI 0.54 0.54 0.28 143.77 -0.736 -0.78 0.47 MNDWI 0.54 0.54 0.28 143.72 0.736 0.78 0.47 Source: Prepared by Authors, 2022 Summarizes the results of the bi variate correlations and linear regression model ( Table1.22 & 1.23 ) among study variables in the observed period of 30 years (1991–2021). In this diagram mainly identify the relationship among study variables in the observed period of 30 years (1991–2021) ( Figure 1.19 ). It is clearly identified that Built up and waterbody represent an inverse relationship. During the time of 1991 correlation value was 0.17 (low positive ) because this phase identify the first footmark of outgrowth of city and within 30years time span that relationship dramatically changed was 0.53 ( medium to high positive ) so that value identify the massive change or transformation of city from waterbody to builtup area. In case of NDPI and NDBI shows the actual condition urban growth and stagnant waterbody of the city, correlation value was 0.61 in 1991 which was converted into 0.18 in 2021. In another sense the inter relationship between NDBI and NDTI also increases from1991 to 2021, in 1991 value was 0.35 and in 2021 value was 0.73. So, all the indicators are helps to correlate our objectives the growth of urban space hamper the number and health of stagnant water body in Berhampore town. The study examined the impact of LULC on NDBI,NDWI,NDPI, NDTI and MNDWI in Berhampore town , from 1991 to 2021.In order to determine the association between study variables and the four land cover indices, a linear regression model (LRM) was applied where NDWI consider as constant. During the study periods, Berhampore experienced significant LULC changes; the built-up area, which has expanded by 12.14 sq.km. as a result of population growth and urbanization. In contrast, waterbody were showed a decreasing trend and decreased by 3.02 sq.km. during the study period respectively. Additionally, during the studies 30 year period the study variables had a statistically significant relationship with rapid urbanization. In Berhampore town wetlands constitute a special ecosystem nurturing a large variety of flora and fauna and it is used as multiple systems. Peripheral households directly and indirectly are utilized the wetlands. Local habitats surrounding the wetlands are classified into two categories according to their uses, such as - (a) Bed village and (b) Belt village . Bed villages are located at the immediate vicinity around the wetlands whose are intimately linked with the wetland functions. On the other, Belt villages are located a away from locality, who exploit wetlands especially for major commercial purpose (Seshavatharam, 1992) . Generally wetlands have lots of functionality in urban space of Berhampore town such as recycle nutrients, purify water, control storm water and floods, maintain stream flow, recharge ground water, providing drinking water, fish culture , control rate of runoff in urban area, Green-blue infrastructures (GBI) is presented as a strategy to deal with climate change in urban areas, Bishnupur Bill has a spiritual value and recreational center of the society. The interaction between man and wetlands during the last few decades has been of disturb largely due to the rapid population growth in Berhampore. So, domestic and industrial wastes are leading pollutant of wetlands in town (commercial and residential site). Presently, we are overlooked the values of wetland and we are belonging in a particular profit maximum state of mind as a result wetlands remain in a great danger. Lots of problem are arise due to unplanned urbanization such as – quality of water decrease as well as biodiversity loss, the aquatic or lentic ecosystem, are hamper by solid waste disposal, sewerage ,waste water disposal and plays of various religious and cultural activities along the wetland zone, ground water depletion, removal of water bodies has led to the decline in water table due encroachment of natural drains, by construction of vertical residential project, removal of vegetative cover, reclamation of wetlands are the prime reasons for frequent flooding even during normal rainfall post 2000. Wetlands are not delineated under any specific administrative jurisdiction of central as well as state government . The primary responsibility for the management of these ecosystems is in the hands of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. Although some wetlands are protected after the formulation of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act – 1974 & 1977 but this is not enough to protect the urban wetland. We must need of Government cooperation along with the local community and corporate sector to come together for an effective management plan to control promoting raj in urban sector. To ensure sustainable success in the protection of wetlands, awareness among the general public, educational and corporate institutions must be created with strict legislation and environment impact assessment needed for major development projects highlighting threats to wetlands need to be formulated. To minimize these problems city administrative authorities should take immediate measures. The findings suggest that policymakers in Berhampore town should be worried about future urban expansion and develop a comprehensive plan for environmentally friendly constriction. The study also revealed that urban wetland can help in improving the overall urban life and sustainable environment. Declarations Funding - This work was not supported financially. Conflict of interest - The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data availability Data of the study were collected from the following sources – https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov, https://censusindia.gov.in, http://www.berhamporemunicipality.org.in/ Acknowledgements – We would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Tapas Das (Faculty, Department of Geography, Nahata JNMS Mahavidyalaya) for his valuable assistance to formulate this paper . References Abd El-Kawya OR, Rød JK, Ismail HA, Suliman AS. Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data. Appl Geogr. 2011;31:483–494. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622810001451 Agnoletti, M., & Rotherham, I. D. (2015). Landscape and biocultural diversity. Biodivers Conservation, 25 , 3155–3165. https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s10531-015-1003-8 Alikhani, S., Nummi, P., & Ojala, A. (2021). Urban Wetlands: A Review on Ecological and Cultural Values. Water, 13 (3301), 01–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223301 Bassi, N., Kumar, M.D., Sharma, A., & Saradhi, P.P. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. Vol. 2, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001 Bhattacharya, S., Mukherjee, K., & Garg, J. (2000). Wetlands of West Bengal. Kolkata: Institute of Wetland Management and Ecological Design. Brinkmann, K., Hoffmann, E., & Buerkert, A. (2020). Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of UrbanWetlands in an Indian Megacity over the Past 50 Years. Remote Sensing, 12 (662), 01–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040662 Campbell, J. B. (1996). Introduction to remote sensing (2nd ed.).London: Taylor and Francis. Census handbook of Murshidabad district : 1991, 2001 and 2011. Chatterjee, U., & Majumdar, S. (2021). Impact of land use change and rapid urbanization on urban heat island in Kolkata city: A remote sensing based perspective. Journal of Urban Management . Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B Das, M., & Das, A. (2019 ). Dynamics of Urbanization and its impact on Urban Ecosystem Services (UESs): A study of a medium size town of West Bengal, Eastern India. Journal of Urban Management . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002 Das, S., & Sahu, A. S. (2020). Monitoring Landuse/ Landcover Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Casestudy on Kanchrapara Municipality and Its Adjoining area, WestBengal,India. Regional Science Inquiry, XII (2), 43–54 http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2020/3 Das, T. M. (2000). Degradation of water bodies and wetlands in West Bengal: Interaction with economic development. Kolkata, West Bengal: EERC Working paper series. Das, T., Jana, A., Mandal, B., & Sutradhar, A. (2021, November). Spatio-temporal pattern of land use and land cover and its effects on land surface temperature using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Bhubaneswar city,Eastern India (1991–2021). Springer : GeoJournal . " https://doi.org/10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z" https://doi.org/10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z De, N. K., & Jana, N. C.(1997). The Land Multifaced Appraisal and Management. Calcutta: Sribhumi Publication Company. Deng, J. S., Wang, K., Hong, Y., & Qi, J. G. (2009). Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning , 187–198. Dumax, N., & Rozan, A. (2021). Valuation of the environmental benefits induced by a constructed wetland. Wetlands Ecology Management . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09811-x Ghermandi, A., van den Bergh, J., Brander, L. M., de Groot, H., & Nunes, P. (2008). The Economic Value Of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-Analysis. SSRN , 1–20. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1273002_code114544.pdf?abstractid=1273002 Islam,M., & Sado.K.( 2006). Analyses of ASTER and Spectroradiometer data with in situ measurements for turbidity and transparency study of lake Abashri, International Journal of Geoinformatics. Vol. 2. 31–45. Jensen, J. R. (1996). Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall Inc. Jensen, J. R., & Cowen, D. C. (1999). Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 65,611–622. http://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/99journal/may/1999_may_611-622 . Khorram, S., Nelson, S., Cakir, H., & Wiele, C. V. (2013). Digital Image Processing: Post-processing and Data Integration. (J. N. Pelton, S. Madry, & S. C. Lara, Eds.) Handbook of Satellite Applications, Springer, 839–862. https://link.springer.com/referencework/ 10.1007/978-1-4419-7671-0 Kiran, R., & Ramachandra, T.V. (1999). Status of wetlands in Bangalore and its conservationaspects. ENVIS Journal of Human Settlements , pp. 16–24. http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/water/paper/status_wetlands/status_wetlands.pdf Kundu, T. (2013). Urbanization in the South - East Resource Region of India - A Case Study of Jharkhand, Orissa and Chattisgarh : 1901–2001. (N. C. Jana, & L. Sivaramakrishnan, Eds.) Reources and Development Issues and Concerns , 280–298. Kumar, R. (2010, November). Integrated Management Planning for East Kolkata Wetlands. East Kolkata Wetlands . South Asia: East Kolkata Wetlands Management Authority & Wetlands International. http://www.ekwma.in/ek/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NewsletterVolume1.pdf Kumar S, Merwade V, James LK, Niyogi D (2013) Evaluation of temperature and precipitation trends and long term persistence, in CMIPs twentieth-century climate simulations. 26:4168–4185 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluation-of-Temperature-and-Precipitation-Trends-Kumar-Merwade/d36eb6de6eca2eb1511bb7c15d64bd553950aac8 Lacaux, J. P., Tourre, Y. M., Vignolles, C., Ndione, J. A., & Lafaye, M. (2007). Classification of ponds from high-spatial resolution remote sensing:Application to Rift Valley Fever epidemics in Senegal. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106 , 66–74. https://doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.012 McFEETERS, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17 (7), 1425–1432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169608948714 McFeeters, S. K. (2013). Using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) within a Geographic Information System to Detect Swimming Pools for Mosquito Abatement: A Practical Approach. Remote Sensing, 5 , 3544–3561. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/5/7/3544 Mitsch, W.J., & Gosselink, J.G. (1993). Wetlands, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley. Ramachandra, T. (2001). Restoration and Management Strategies of Wetlands in developing countries. Electronic Green Journel. Vol 1 (13), pp. 1–18. https://escholarship.org/content/qt22f875tq/qt22f875tq.pdf?t=li4xjt Ramsar Convention Secretariat. (2010). Wise Use of Wetlands: Concepts and Approaches for the Wise Use of Wetlands. (Ramsar Handbook for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th ed., Vol.1. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat). Roy, S. K., & Biswas, S. (2021). Transformation of Berhampore Municipal Surrounding Area from Concentric Zone to Multiple Nuclei Zones. Territorio Della Ricercasu Insediamenti E Ambiente International Journal Of Urban Planning . 26 (1/2021) 97–112/https://DOI. 10.6092/2281-4574/8267 . Rwanga, S. S. & Ndambuki, J. M. (2017). “Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS.” International Journal of Geosciences. Accuracy. (8): 611–622. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033 Sarkar, U. K., & Borah, B. C. (2017). Flood plain wetland fisheries of India: with special reference to impact of climate change. WetlandsEcologyManagement . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318164151 . Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 Schuyt, K., & Brander, L. (2004). Living Waters, Conserving the Source of Life: The Economic Values of the Worlds Wetlands. Gland/Amsterdam: WWF. Scott, D. A. (1989). A Directory of Asian Wetlands . IUCN. Senthilnathan, S. (2019). Usefulness of Correlation Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009(July). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416918 Seshavatharam, V. (1992). Ecological Status of Kolleru lake: A review. In K. Chatrath, Wetlands of India . New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House, pp. 171–200. Sharma ( Sarkar), S. (2012). Trend of Urbanisation in Berhampore Municipality: A Geographical Analysis. Geo-Analyst, 2 (2), 49–56. Singh, K. V., Setia, R., Sahoo, S., Prasad, A., & Pateriya, B. (2014). Evaluation of NDWI and MNDWI for assessment of waterlogging by integrating digital elevation model and groundwater level. Geocarto International , 01–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.965757 Space Application Centre. (2010). National Wetland Atlas: West Bengal. Ahmedabad: ISRO,MoEF, Govt. of India, p. 46 Stewart, P., Neice, P., & Rubec C & Taylor, I. (1996). The Federal Policy on wetland conservation Implementation Guide for Federal Land Managers. Ottawa, Ontario: Wildlife Conservation Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service. https://nawcc.wetlandnetwork.ca/Fed%20Policy%20Wetland%20Conserv_Implement%20Guide%20for%20Fed%20Land%20Mgrs.pdf Tiner, R. (1996). Wetland definitions and classifications in the United States. In J. W. Fretwell, National Water Summary on Wetland Resources . Washington D.C.: United States Geological Survey. https://www.fws.gov/northeast/ecologicalservices/pdf/wetlands/Tech%20Aspects%20Wetland%20Definitions%20and%20Classifcation%20in%20the%20US.pdf Tiner, R. (1999). Wetland indicators: A guide to wetland identification, Delineation,Classification and mapping. Tucker, C. J., & Sellers, P. J. (2007). Satellite remote sensing of primary production. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7 (11), 1395–1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948944 Turner, R. K., Bergh, J. C., Barendregt, T. S., Straaten, J. v., Maltby, E., & Ierland, E.C. (2000). Ecological Economic Analysis of Wetlands: Scientific Integration for Management and Policy. Ecological Economics- Special Issue on The Values of Wetlands: Landscape and Institutional Perspectives , 7–23. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.203.502&rep=rep1&type=pdf Xu, H. (2006). Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27 (14), 3025–3033. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ 10.1080/01431160600589179 Zha, Y., Gao, J., & Ni, S. (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24 (3), 583–594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160304987 Zhao, J. (2013). The impact on Personality knowledge sharing of personality traits: organizational trust as intermediary variable. Information Studies:Theory & Application, 36(5), 34–38. http://search.ebscohost.com/login Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1475935","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":105408344,"identity":"c833d3d7-083e-4759-82cf-97902c911e4f","order_by":0,"name":"Subham Kumar Roy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"PROF. SYED NURUL HASAN COLLEGE, FARAKKA,MURSHIDABAD","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Subham","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Roy","suffix":""},{"id":105408345,"identity":"adf3b1cf-4e2a-4f6d-bce3-76c0e5987ceb","order_by":1,"name":"Chumki Mondal","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"KHANDRA COLLEGE. KHANDRA, PASCHIM BARDHAMAN","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chumki","middleName":"","lastName":"Mondal","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-03-22 04:14:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":21974124,"identity":"1d8d7882-6ef7-4f69-9ed8-7363fa584df7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":648292,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLocation Map of Study Area\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/5101c64b75f28ef8ef6b5543.png"},{"id":21974126,"identity":"e2c61d61-4c02-4fdd-a0f8-011f6bff81a4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":16410,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePopulation Growth of Study Area from 1901 to 2011\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/cca78945a11b0eb82d5fb212.png"},{"id":21974326,"identity":"41523c0c-8772-4399-b396-354df3648988","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:01:47","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":260157,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLand use and land cover classification pattern in 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/b597a4bf59dfa320e67aa6f8.png"},{"id":21974625,"identity":"69ab3768-3de9-4c06-ae01-216b70af573d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:11:47","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":24176,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of LULC in 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/410392a03be7483fd29b0a6e.png"},{"id":21974335,"identity":"4001174d-f697-4f9c-aea0-a439530a6888","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:01:47","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":215000,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSpatial distributions of Vegetation cover from 1991 to 2021\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/ebadb79747cf122b7fadd7f7.png"},{"id":21974137,"identity":"ff0a6a9f-d7dc-4b60-b2ce-0586796a8bc7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":113920,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSpatial distributions of Open Area from 1991 to 2021\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/dbeff1254401f257218be51f.png"},{"id":21974139,"identity":"8e3b4d60-17ff-4dda-ab70-85e2cea488ff","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":240430,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSpatial distributions of Builtup Area from 1991 to 2021\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/1fad39112a643e3d93be065d.png"},{"id":21974336,"identity":"66deac10-cc41-4eba-9ce0-82311b9619ed","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:01:47","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":258494,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNormalized Difference Water Index (\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNDWI)from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/8e4a58a0295d994e117b9d65.png"},{"id":21974492,"identity":"abefdb7d-7962-411c-97bc-992597a2f679","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:06:47","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":13529,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of\u0026nbsp;NDWI 1991-2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/7caf53947af811859e458185.png"},{"id":21974142,"identity":"1b9b922e-2e9b-42f4-91b0-846797499b97","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"Figure 11","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":281448,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNormalized Difference Buildup Index (\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNDBI)from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"11.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/aec1e0e06713688655a78179.png"},{"id":21974327,"identity":"25a5936c-40bb-4041-8205-a2c3f0a076c4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:01:47","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"Figure 12","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":12514,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of\u0026nbsp;NDBI 1991-2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"12.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/3ec379d4a5df9a158789455a.png"},{"id":21974332,"identity":"ffe560b9-e525-428f-80fd-382e1bf1d915","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:01:47","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"Figure 13","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":283963,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eModified \u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNormalized Difference Water Index (M\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNDWI)from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"13.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/974f85230d00566a136b7a90.png"},{"id":21974628,"identity":"fd35ad73-6955-40b3-aae0-7ce396cbffa8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:11:47","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"Figure 14","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":12045,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of\u0026nbsp;MNDWI 1991-2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"14.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/0edf9be5e67d55ed999bdacd.png"},{"id":21974136,"identity":"d099ec32-be08-4675-b41c-09ed88cbb03e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":15,"title":"Figure 15","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":175226,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNormalized Difference Pond Index (\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNDPI)from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"15.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/c76a413cf2fffc8d7b58a339.png"},{"id":21974496,"identity":"82a0d659-c364-4768-86be-810fcc99b106","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:06:47","extension":"png","order_by":16,"title":"Figure 16","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":12576,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of\u0026nbsp;NDPI 1991-2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"16.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/d540e4b7de8d31eca35aac56.png"},{"id":21974498,"identity":"9245b612-bec8-430a-a2a5-615d4b9eec80","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:06:47","extension":"png","order_by":17,"title":"Figure 17","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":281755,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNormalized Difference Turbidity Index (\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNDTI)from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"17.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/8cf405df0fc06eda4a6c07c8.png"},{"id":21974132,"identity":"df9125e2-7a1e-4311-8ce0-ec1e22e5625a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":18,"title":"Figure 18","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":11420,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTemporal Change of\u0026nbsp;NDTI 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"18.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/5c769aab05065a8c174d14ee.png"},{"id":21974143,"identity":"ccd3863d-b2f5-4a28-9bd2-58bd913a51b0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:47","extension":"png","order_by":19,"title":"Figure 19","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":250043,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCorrelation among study variables in 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"19.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/ca39fd9cbacd9e6c81c204fb.png"},{"id":21974826,"identity":"e1127b5d-0964-4da3-a574-9ecfa5697601","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 18:16:47","extension":"png","order_by":20,"title":"Figure 20","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":147468,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTransformation of Waterbody from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"20.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/de659cb45de69917ed4a50e1.png"},{"id":21974144,"identity":"82230694-6d31-4ab8-b4c5-651773170f76","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-27 17:56:57","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2324904,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1475935/v1/b0393fd8-f284-428d-99d2-9e290a22f4dd.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eImpact of Rapid Urbanization and Changes Face of Landuse on Urban Wetland: Acase Study of Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal (India)\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eWetlands are permanently or seasonally water-saturated on land areas with a fundamental hydrologic landscape unit where perennial water lies on shallow or deep trench. According to \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eUS Fish and Wildlife Service (1979)\u003c/span\u003e \u0026ndash; Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water level is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. Wetlands not only maintain the ecological balance rather they also maintain flood control, increase the rate of ground water recharge, flourish aquaculture and also help to developed good recreational sector etc. Wetlands are one of the crucial natural resources on the earth surface which helps to support rich species diversity. Wetland is a generic term for water bodies of various types, and includes diverse hydrological entities, named as, marshes, swamps, bogs, wet meadows, potholes, and river overflow lands \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Tiner, 1999)\u003c/span\u003e. Somehow, wetland controls the surface run-off from moving swiftly or overflowing the river banks. Due to their massive or numerous functionality sometime wetlands are described as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;the kidneys of the landscape\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e in hydrological and chemical cycle as the downstream section receives wastes from both natural and human sources \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(De \u0026amp; Jana, 1997).\u003c/span\u003e Now-a-days wetlands have been analyzed as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;biological supermarkets\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e for their extensive food webs and rich biodiversity support \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eMitsch \u0026amp; Gosselink, 1993)\u003c/span\u003e. Wetlands also have an ecologically sensitive and adaptive system \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Turner et al., 2000)\u003c/span\u003e it was the most productive ecosystem on the earth\u0026apos;s surface \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Ghermandi et al., 2008)\u003c/span\u003e. Wetlands consist of diversity according to their geographical location, nature, dominated by flora and fauna species, soil and sediment properties \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Space Application Centre, 2010).\u003c/span\u003e Lack of conformity among government policies and human awareness in the field of nature conservation, it is one of the most important reason for the deterioration of water bodies in the field of planning \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Turner et al., 2000, Bassi et al., 2014).\u003c/span\u003e According to landscape approach that allows to consideration of the results of environmental, economic, and social systems in time and space and the more general process of \u0026lsquo;\u0026lsquo;environ-mental bio-diversification\u0026rsquo;\u0026rsquo; which are influences on up gradation of environmental resources (\u003cstrong\u003eAgnoletti 2015\u003c/strong\u003e).There are also people continue to depend on locally available bio-resources for their livelihoods, such population who are directly dependent on local biological resources. Through their keen sense of observation, practices, and experimentation developed and established a body of knowledge that is passed on from generation to generation. Some are widespread traditional knowledge like cultivation practices. Wetland ecosystems are triggered by the lack of good governance and management. \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eT.V. Ramachandra, (2001)\u003c/span\u003e has worked on the issue of restoration and management strategies of wetlands in developing countries in the context of world and Indian scenario. \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eRitesh Kumar, (2010)\u003c/span\u003e has stressed upon the management plan for east Kolkata wetlands. \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eManojit Paul, Mukti Chanda and Supriya Sengupta\u003c/span\u003e have played a pioneering role in conducting a survey to assess the strategy and scenario for wetland conservation in India. \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003eThe Ramsar Convention on wetlands in 1971(2010)\u003c/span\u003e has a definite mission as ―the conservation and wise use of all wetlands through local, regional and national actions and international cooperation, as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development throughout the world. In 2013, 163 nations have joined together to include another 2060 wetlands around the world in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. The Ramsar Convention Manual, 6th edition has outlined the definition of wetlands, its values and conservation strategies. It has mentioned wetland as one of the most important ecosystem of world which is in the verge of degradation. So, we need to protect the wetlands at any cost. In India, the rapidly growing human population, land use alteration, improper use of watersheds has caused a substantial decline in wetlands resources throughout the country. Anthropogenic pressures are posing a serious threat to the survival of wetland ecosystem. A collaborated research involving natural, social, and inter-disciplinary study, which aims at understanding the various components, monitoring of water quality, economic valuation, biodiversity, and other activities as an indispensable tool for formulating an effective and long term conservation strategies on wetland management \u003cspan class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldItalic\"\u003e(Kiran et al. 1999)\u003c/span\u003e. Those publications stressed a wide approach to wetlands conservation and suggested several desirable solutions, all of which have been taken into account for future wetland research in Berhampore municipality. The foregoing literature analysis clearly depicts the current state of wetlands in India and around the world. However, in the case of identifying research needs, micro-scale wetland-related research in the Murshidabad area has yet to be completed at a suitable scale. We classified inland wetland groups in our study region during the research process (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSchuyt \u0026amp; Brander (2004)\u003c/strong\u003e describe four types of functions performed by wetlands:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eRegulation function\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e- Wetlands regulate ecological processes that contribute to a healthy environment (recycling nutrients, ground water recharge etc.).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eCarrier functions\u003c/em\u003e- Wetlands provide space for activities such as cultivation, energy production and habitat for animals.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eProduction functions\u003c/em\u003e- Wetlands also provide resources for people (food, water, raw materials etc.) to sustain their life.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eInformation functions\u003c/em\u003e- Wetlands contribute to control mental stability by providing scientific and spiritual values.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccording to \u003cstrong\u003eUS Millennium Ecosystem\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eAssessment\u003c/strong\u003e report says that the level of degradation of wetland is higher than the other ecosystem in the world, that\u0026rsquo;s why society needs human awareness about wetland conversation and various necessary measures also had been taken to control present day scenario. Wetlands are classified in various category. Schoot are classified into five categories that\u0026rsquo;s are -\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul class=\"decimal_type\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eEstuaries\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; Where rivers meet the sea and salinity is intermediate between salt and freshwater, such as deltas, mudflats, salt marshes etc.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eMarine\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash; It is influenced by river flows such as shorelines and coral reefs etc.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eRiverine\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; It is generally found along the perennial river such as oxbow lake, water meadows etc. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eLacustrine\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026ndash; That areas covered with permanent water with slight flow such as pond, lakes etc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eConstructed\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThat wetland is an artificial wetland to treat by local government or industrial waste water or storm water runoff. It may also be designed for land reclamation or use as a mitigation step for natural areas lost to changing landuse pattern.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cdiv align=\"center\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"3\" valign=\"bottom\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1.1: \u003cem\u003eClassification of Wetland category in study area \u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"bottom\" width=\"26.283048211508554%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWETLAND CATEGORY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"bottom\" width=\"27.682737169517885%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTYPE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"bottom\" width=\"46.034214618973564%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEXAMPLE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" width=\"26.283048211508554%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eINLAND WETLAND\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.682737169517885%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNATURAL\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"bottom\" width=\"46.034214618973564%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLAKE , POND , OX BOW LAKE, CUT OFF MEANDER, WATER LOGGED,RIVER,RIVERINE WETLAND\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"37.552742616033754%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMANMADE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"bottom\" width=\"62.447257383966246%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRESERVOIR,BARRAGE, TANK,POND, WATERLOGGED, RECREATIONAL SPOT\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1.2 Objectives\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo evaluate how wetlands are affected by unplanned urbanization directly or indirectly with the help of spatio - temporal change.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo show the major problems and some probable solutions for wetland conservation in study area.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1.3\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelection of study area\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe area under study is Berhampore Municipality, under Berhampore block of Murshidabad District of West Bengal. Berhampore Municipality is one of the oldest municipalities in West Bengal. Berhampore municipality was established in 1876. \u0026nbsp;Geographically the area extends from 88\u0026ordm;14\u0026rsquo; 57\u0026rdquo; East to 88\u0026ordm;15\u0026rsquo;50\u0026rdquo; East and from 24\u0026ordm;04\u0026rsquo;39\u0026rdquo; North to 24\u0026ordm;07\u0026rsquo;48\u0026rdquo; North (\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eFigure 1.1\u003c/u\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. According to census 2011, Total area of Berhampore Municipality is 31.42 km\u0026sup2; spread into 25 Wards. The Bhagirathi River flows across the entire west of the city from north to south. The N.H. 34 divides the city into two sections, and the Easter Railway running through the eastern section. Berhampore is the administrative, nodal, and district headquarters of the Murshidabad district. According to census of India , 2011 - Berhampore town categorized as class-1 municipality town and 7th largest city in West Bengal. This is perhaps the only municipality in the state of W.B, which is the member of IHCN (Indian Heritage Cities Network), (Sharma, 2012). It is a highly functional unit which plays a vital role to provide good urban services all over the urban territory and its surroundings.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Database and Methodology","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.1. Materials\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec3\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThis study leaned heavily on secondary data derived from multiple of official and non-government sources. Berhampore Municipality\u0026apos;s ward map was obtained from the Berhampore Municipality. USGS Earth Explorer was used to retrieve Landsat images from 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021 (\u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;1.2\u003c/strong\u003e). Those data have been processed in order to achieve the goals. To reduce the number of errors, cloud-free photos were used for the analysis. Ground truth verification was carried out in order to improve the study\u0026apos;s correctness. Information on the growth and development of Berhampore town has been gathered from the Berhampore Municipality\u0026apos;s various offices. The last matter was settled following a ground truth inspection of the wetland sites in Berhampore municipality to determine their current state.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab2\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.2\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDetails of used Landsat data\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSL. NO.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDATE ACQUIRED\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSATELLITE SENSOR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWRS- PATH/ROW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDATUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAP PROJECTION\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1991-01-24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLandsat 5/ TM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139/43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWGS 84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUTM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2001-01-19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLandsat 5/ TM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139/43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWGS 84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUTM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011-01-31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLandsat 5/ TM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139/43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWGS 84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUTM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021-02-11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLandsat 8/ OLI-TIRS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139/43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWGS 84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUTM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec5\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.2. Image processing\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePre-processing satellite images prior to change detection is critical in order to develop a more direct link between the acquired data and biophysical processes (Abd El-Kawya et al., 2011). Both remote sensing and GIS techniques were used in the assessment. Various cartographic techniques have been adopted for mapping purposes. Using MS Office Excel and SPSS software, numerous parametric statistical studies were performed to demonstrate demographic growth. Arc GIS 10.2 software has been used to derive the data and map preparation of the NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI, NDPI, and NDTI indexes.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec6\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.3. Image classification\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAfter that, supervised image classification methods are used to classify the pre-processed images. The maximum likelihood algorithm incorporated into the Arc GIS application will classify according to the number of classes necessary and the digital number of pixels available in the supervised classification approach. The maximum likelihood algorithm will classify the image in the supervised classification technique based on the training sets (signatures) provided by the user based on his area knowledge. The user\u0026apos;s training data instructs the software on which types of pixels should be used for certain land cover classes. Finally, the classification yields the area\u0026apos;s land use/land cover image. The research area is divided into four land use and land cover classes: water bodies, vegetation areas, open space, and built-up areas.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec7\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.4. Supervised image classification:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSupervised classification is a user-guided method that involves selecting training sites as category references (Campbell 1996 \u0026amp;Jensen 1996). In this technique, supervised image classification is a true procedure for recognizing spectrally comparable areas on satellite images by assigning training sites of known targets and then extracting those spectral fingerprints to other areas of unknown targets. The analyst\u0026apos;s classifications are a three-stage procedure that includes training, classification, and output. The analyst selects training sites to reflect areas with known cover kinds during the training stage. Liveware identified links between different types of land and their spectral frequency of multiple wave lengths at this stage. The classification stage is the second step in the supervised classification process, and it involves categorizing a large number of spectral bands into precise land use and land cover categories. Maximum likelihood is the most extensively used classification algorithm. The output stage is the last step in the process. The results are presented, visualized, and interpreted using the output products. Finally, the analyst compresses the classified data into a specified group of classes and presents it in digital graphical and tabular form. The statistical parameters, accuracy assessment table, and other supporting information are included with the end product (Khorram et. al.2013). A supervised image classification system was employed in this study to demonstrate change detection across a 30-year period. In the supervised image classification, four land use and land cover (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.3\u003c/span\u003e) units of the study region are represented by groups of training pixels. Using the Arc GIS (10.2) programme, each image is classified independently using the supervised image classification method with the help of maximum likelihood algorithm.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab3\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.3\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLand use and Land cover classes of study area.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCLASSES OF IMAGE CLASSIFICATION\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDESCRIPTION\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWATERBODY\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNatural and Manmade Lake, Ox-bow and Ponds.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVEGETATION AREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDeciduous Forest Lands, Gardens, Mixed Forest Lands, Roadside or Riverside vegetation areas etc.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOPEN SPACE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStadium, Play Ground, Park, Recreational spot and Project area under construction.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBUILTUP AREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eResidential, Commercial and Services lands.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec8\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.5. Accuracy assessment :\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe term \u0026apos;accuracy\u0026apos; is often used to indicate the measure of a derived map\u0026apos;s (classification\u0026apos;s) \u0026apos;correctness,\u0026apos; which is tested using an error-matrix. A significant number of remote sensing studies have focused on accuracy assessment as a key component. The accuracy assessment of change detection procedures, on the other hand, is still in the experimental stage and entails concerns such as sampling strategies that aren\u0026apos;t commonly recognized, image registration, boundary problems, and reference data. Error matrix analysis (Khorram et al.2013) is the most often used approach for assessing accuracy (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.4\u003c/span\u003e). Individual classifications are critical in the change detection procedure. As a result, a comprehensive accuracy evaluation must contain a report on overall accuracy, user accuracy, and producer accuracy, all of which were studied using the Kappa coefficient.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab4\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.4\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKappa Statistics (Rwanga, 2017)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSL.NO.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE OF K\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSTATUS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePoor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.0\u0026ndash;0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSlight\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.21\u0026ndash;0.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFair\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.41\u0026ndash;0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u0026ndash;0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGood\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.81\u0026ndash;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVery good\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"3\"\u003eSource: Das \u0026amp; Sahu, 2020\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverall Accuracy\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{c}\\text{o}\\text{r}\\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{c}\\text{t}\\text{l}\\text{y} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}\\text{i}\\text{f}\\text{i}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} \\left(\\text{D}\\text{i}\\text{a}\\text{g}\\text{o}\\text{n}\\text{a}\\text{l}\\right)}{\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{f}\\text{e}\\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{n}\\text{c}\\text{e} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} }\\times 100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn a comparable way to overall accuracy, the classification performance of distinct classes is assessed. There are two methods for achieving accuracy: user accuracy and producer accuracy. The producer\u0026apos;s accuracy is derived by dividing the total number of pixels collected from the reference data by the number of accurate pixels in one categorization. Meanwhile, the user\u0026apos;s accuracy is determined by dividing the total number of pixels categorized in each class by the number of accurately identified pixels in that class. The accuracy of the user assesses the commission error and shows the likelihood that a pixel categorized into a particular category represents that class on the ground. The following formula is used to calculate the accuracy of the user and the producer:\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUser Accuracy\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{c}\\text{o}\\text{r}\\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{c}\\text{t}\\text{l}\\text{y} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}\\text{i}\\text{f}\\text{i}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} \\text{i}\\text{n} \\text{e}\\text{a}\\text{c}\\text{h} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s} }{\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}\\text{i}\\text{f}\\text{i}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} \\text{i}\\text{n} \\text{t}\\text{h}\\text{a}\\text{t} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s} \\left(\\text{T}\\text{h}\\text{e} \\text{R}\\text{o}\\text{w} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l}\\right)}\\times 100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProducer Accuracy\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{c}\\text{o}\\text{r}\\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{c}\\text{t}\\text{l}\\text{y} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}\\text{i}\\text{f}\\text{i}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} \\text{i}\\text{n} \\text{e}\\text{a}\\text{c}\\text{h} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}}{\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{N}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{b}\\text{e}\\text{r} \\text{o}\\text{f} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s}\\text{i}\\text{f}\\text{i}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{p}\\text{i}\\text{x}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{l}\\text{s} \\text{i}\\text{n} \\text{t}\\text{h}\\text{a}\\text{t} \\text{c}\\text{l}\\text{a}\\text{s}\\text{s} \\left(\\text{T}\\text{h}\\text{e} \\text{C}\\text{o}\\text{l}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{n} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l}\\right)}\\times 100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe Kappa coefficient (K) is another study indicator that is used to determine the study\u0026apos;s level of relevance. Kappa has a value of 0 to 1, with 0 denoting agreement based only on chance. A number of 1 indicates that the two data sets are in full agreement. Although negative values are possible, they are erroneous. The Kappa statistic is a more complicated measure of classifier agreement that is better at differentiating between classes than total accuracy. The Kappa Coefficient equation was used to determine if the values in an error matrix represent a result that is significantly better than random (Congalton, 1991) or to determine if the values in an error matrix represent a result that is significantly better than random (Jensen and Cowen, 1999).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(K) =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{(\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{s}\\text{a}\\text{m}\\text{p}\\text{l}\\text{e}-\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{c}\\text{o}\\text{r}\\text{r}\\text{e}\\text{c}\\text{t}\\text{e}\\text{d} \\text{s}\\text{a}\\text{m}\\text{p}\\text{l}\\text{e})- {\\Sigma }(\\text{C}\\text{o}\\text{l}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{n} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\times \\text{R}\\text{o}\\text{w} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l})}{\\left(\\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\text{s}\\text{a}\\text{m}\\text{p}\\text{l}\\text{e}\\right)2- {\\Sigma }(\\text{C}\\text{o}\\text{l}\\text{u}\\text{m}\\text{n} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l} \\times \\text{R}\\text{o}\\text{w} \\text{T}\\text{o}\\text{t}\\text{a}\\text{l}) }\\times 100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab5\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.5\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSummary of Accuracy Assessment from 1991 to 2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLAND USE / LAND COVER CLASS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1991\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUSER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePRODUCER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUSER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePRODUCER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUSER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePRODUCER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUSER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePRODUCER\u0026apos;S ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWATERBODY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.833\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVEGETATION\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.81\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOPEN AREA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBUILTUP AREA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.81\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOVERALL ACCURACY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKAPPA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.74\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.92\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.81\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.81\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe overall accuracy of 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.5\u003c/span\u003e) was found to be 0.8, 0.95, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively. In this study, producer and user accuracy ranges from 0.75 to 0.88, 0.76 to 0.83 in 1991, 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.8 to 0.87 in 2001, 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.8 to 0.87 in 2011, producer and user accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.88 and 0.8 to 0.9 in 2011, and 0.83 to 0.88 and 0.8 to 0.9 in 2021. In 1991, 2001, 2011, and 2021, the classification\u0026apos;s Kappa coefficients were 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively. According to Rwanga\u0026apos;s classification scale (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.4\u003c/span\u003e), the classification ranges from good to very good from 1991 to 2021.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec9\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6. Method for calculating NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI,NDPI and NPTI statistical assessment:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo illustrate the relationship between built-up area and water content of different indices were calculated using Landsat data with the help of GIS software Arc GIS as NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index), NDBI (Normalized Difference Built-up Index), MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index),NDPI (Normalized Difference Pond Index) and NDTI (Normalized Difference Turbidity Index) respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec10\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6.1. NDWI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe NDWI Index (Normalized Difference Water Index) is a satellite image visual indicator that is primarily utilised for remote sensing measures, particularly open surface water body mapping. For the most part, two bands have been utilised to calculate the NDWI Index. Green Band and Near Infrared are the two options. It\u0026apos;s constantly between \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1 and +\u0026thinsp;1. Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.6\u003c/span\u003e assists in the classification of the study area\u0026apos;s NDWI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDWI INDEX\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{GREEN-NIR}{GREEN+NIR }\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, in Landsat 5 TM, the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52\u0026ndash;0.60 \u0026micro;m) and the NIR band indicates Band 4 (0.77\u0026ndash;0.90 \u0026micro;m) and in Landsat 8 OLI - TIRS, the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53\u0026ndash;0.59 \u0026micro;m) and the NIR band indicates Band 5 (0.85\u0026ndash;0.88 \u0026micro;m).That the positive values of NDWI are assumed to represent water surfaces, while the negative values are assumed to be non-water surfaces (McFeeters,1996).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab6\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.6\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndex values for NDBI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCATEGORIES\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLOW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; -0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEDIUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.16 - -0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.07- 0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVERY HIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec11\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6.2. NDBI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDBI Index (Normalized Difference Builtup Index) is another useful graphical indicator, which is for measuring the urban areas specially built up areas or artificial structure. It ranges from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1 to +\u0026thinsp;1, with negative values indicating water bodies and vegetation cover in the earth surface, low positive values indicating barren soil types and positive values indicating built-up areas. NDBI helps to measures that the rate of urbanization. Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.7\u003c/span\u003e assists in the classification of the study area\u0026apos;s NDBI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI INDEX\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R}- \\text{N}\\text{I}\\text{R}}{\\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R}+ \\text{N}\\text{I}\\text{R}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, in Landsat 5 TM, the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55\u0026ndash;1.75\u0026micro;m) and the NIR band indicates Band 4 (0.76\u0026ndash;0.90 \u0026micro;m); in Landsat 8 OLI, the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57\u0026ndash;1.65 \u0026micro;m) and the NIR band indicates Band 5 (0.85\u0026ndash;0.88 \u0026micro;m). This index is mainly used for the mapping of constructional area where a positive value indicates the presence of artificial structure or manmade structure and the lower value indicates the availability of natural features existing on earth surface.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab7\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.7\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndex values for NDBI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCATEGORIES\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLOW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; -0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEDIUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.07 - -0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.02\u0026ndash;0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVERY HIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec12\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6.3. MNDWI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMNDBI Index (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index) is another pictorial representation, which is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1 to +\u0026thinsp;1, (Xu, 2006) to reduce the urban noise in the delineation of water bodies. Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.8\u003c/span\u003e assists in the classification of the study area\u0026apos;s MNDWI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI INDEX\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}- \\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R}}{\\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}+ \\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, in Landsat 5 TM, the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52\u0026ndash;0.60 \u0026micro;m) and the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55\u0026ndash;1.75\u0026micro;m) and in Landsat 8 OLI - TIRS, the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53\u0026ndash;0.59 \u0026micro;m) and the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57\u0026ndash;1.65 \u0026micro;m). Due to growing values of water features and lowering values of built-up land from positive to negative, the MNDWI\u0026apos;s contrast between water and built-upland will be significantly widened. Increased water enhancement in the MNDWI-image will result in more accurate extraction of open water features, as built-up land, soil, and vegetation all have negative values and are thus significantly muted, if not completely deleted (Xu,2006).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab8\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.8\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndex values for MNDWI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCATEGORIES\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLOW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; -0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEDIUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.15 - -0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.07\u0026ndash;0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVERY HIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec13\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6.4. NDPI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDPI Index (Normalized Difference Pond Index) is another graphical indicator, used for the enhancement of open water features. It also helps to the pond area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1 to +\u0026thinsp;1. Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.9\u003c/span\u003e assists in the classification of the study area\u0026apos;s MNDWI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI INDEX\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R}- \\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}}{ \\text{S}\\text{W}\\text{I}\\text{R} +\\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, in Landsat 5 TM, the SWIR band indicates Band 5 (1.55\u0026ndash;1.75\u0026micro;m) and the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52\u0026ndash;0.60 \u0026micro;m) and Landsat 8 OLI \u0026ndash; TIRS, the SWIR band indicates Band 6 (1.57\u0026ndash;1.65 \u0026micro;m) and the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53\u0026ndash;0.59 \u0026micro;m). When combined with NDVI, the NDPI provides greater distinction between aquatic and wetland vegetation and typical vegetation than the NDVI alone. This representation has significantly improved the results, particularly for small and shallow water bodies, and it now contains all edge pixels of water bodies that can be visually distinguished from the image. The threshold values for various factors change depending on the soil background and are implemented as a set of conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab9\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.9\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndex values for NDPI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCATEGORIES\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLOW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; -0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEDIUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u0026ndash;0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.05\u0026ndash;0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVERY HIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec14\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.6.5. NDTI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDTI Index (Normalized Difference Turbidity Index) is another imagistic indicator, used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices. It ranges from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1 to +\u0026thinsp;1. Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.10\u003c/span\u003e assists in the classification of the study area\u0026apos;s MNDWI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI INDEX\u003c/strong\u003e =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{D}- \\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}}{ \\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{D} +\\text{G}\\text{R}\\text{E}\\text{E}\\text{N}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, in Landsat 5 TM, the Red band indicates Band 3 (0.63\u0026ndash;0.69 \u0026micro;m) and the Green band indicates Band 2 (0.52\u0026ndash;0.60 \u0026micro;m) and Landsat 8 OLI \u0026ndash; TIRS the Red band indicates Band 4 (0.64 \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.67 \u0026micro;m) and the Green band indicates Band 3 (0.53\u0026ndash;0.59 \u0026micro;m). The availability of suspended particles in the water has increased turbidity levels, with the red band reflecting more than the green band (Islam et.al., 2006). The NDTI allows for the identification of water with a high turbidity (poor clarity) (Lacaux et al., 2007). This spectral characteristic of turbid water has been captured in Lacaux\u0026apos;s Normalized Difference Turbidity Index, which can be used to detect turbid water pixels. Based on a study of sensor data in the scenario of severely turbid water bodies when the value is larger than +\u0026thinsp;0.25.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab10\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.10\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndex values for NDTI.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCATEGORIES\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVALUE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLOW\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; -0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEDIUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.04\u0026ndash;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVERY HIGH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec15\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.4.7. STATISTICAL MEASURES:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCorrelation analysis is a form of statistical analysis which allows researchers to explore the degree of association between independent and dependent variables (Schober \u0026amp; Schwarte, 2018 ; Senthilnathan,2019).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003er =\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{\\sum (Xi- \\stackrel{-}{\\text{x}} )(\\text{Y}\\text{i}-\\stackrel{-}{\\text{y}})}{\\sqrt{{\\left(Xi- \\stackrel{-}{\\text{x}} \\right)}^{2}\\sum }{(\\text{Y}\\text{i}-\\stackrel{-}{\\text{y}})}^{2}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ewhere, \u0026lsquo;r\u0026rsquo; is the Pearson products moment correlation coefficient, \u0026lsquo;x\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rsquo; is values of x variable in a sample, \u0026lsquo;\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\stackrel{-}{\\text{x}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rsquo; mean of values of x variable, y\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e is the value of y variable in the sample, and \u0026lsquo;\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\stackrel{-}{\\text{y}}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rsquo; is mean values of y variable.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo demonstrate the impacts of the NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI, NDPI, and NDTI, scatter plots were created using regression analysis with all time-points from 1991 to 2021. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC) measures the direction and strength of the relationship between two variables, while regression analysis describes the functional relationship between variables independent (x) and dependent (y) (H\u0026auml;rdle \u0026amp; Vieu, 1992; Zhao, 2013). Linear regression is used to ascertain the impact of several numbers of independent variables, X\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e, X\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, X\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026hellip;X\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e on a single dependent variable y Symbolically.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ey\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;\u0026beta;\u003csub\u003e0\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;x\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026beta;\u003csub\u003e1+\u0026hellip;\u003c/sub\u003e x\u003csub\u003ep\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026beta;\u003csub\u003ep\u003c/sub\u003e+ Ɛ\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhere, \u0026lsquo;\u0026beta;\u0026rsquo; reflects how much of an effect x has on y, and \u0026lsquo;Ɛ\u0026rsquo; is the error term.\u003c/p\u003e\n \n \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Result","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec16\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.1. Population growth:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec17\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn the latter half of Eighteenth century, for observing the \u003cem\u003eNawabai\u003c/em\u003e activity, a military camp was formed in \u0026lsquo;\u003cem\u003eBrahmapur mouza\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eMr. Beveridge\u003c/em\u003e wrote about Brahmapur in his book \u003cem\u003eOld places of Murshidabad\u003c/em\u003e ,Calcutta Reviewed,1892. Due to pronunciation this \u003cem\u003eBrahmapur\u003c/em\u003e was later renamed as \u003cem\u003eBerhampore\u003c/em\u003e. After the battle of \u003cem\u003ePalashi\u003c/em\u003e ,1757 and the battle of \u003cem\u003eMir Qashim,1763\u003c/em\u003e, the construction of cantonment has started at Brahmapur mouza to keep an eye on Nawabi activities. According to \u003cem\u003eHunter\u003c/em\u003e, that cantonment was completed in 1767 and the chief architect was \u003cem\u003eA.Campbell.\u003c/em\u003e The city of Berhampore was formed around this cantonment. As per \u003cem\u003eState Paper Report\u003c/em\u003e 1858 by \u003cem\u003eSir Frederick James Haliday\u003c/em\u003e (British Civil Servant \u0026amp; first Lieutenant Governor of Bengal) \u0026ndash; states that the Sipoy revolt, 1857 that started across all over India started in Brahmapur Cantonment. After that the cantonment was demolished in 1870. \u003cem\u003eKing Thibaut\u003c/em\u003e of \u003cem\u003eBurma\u003c/em\u003e was defeated and taken prisoner during the third \u003cem\u003eIngo \u0026ndash; Burmese war.\u003c/em\u003e This old town was famous for silk production due to these factor Armenian merchants was come to this famous town nearly 1665. The \u003cem\u003eFrench mansion\u003c/em\u003e was built in 1668. Due to \u003cem\u003eBhagharathi River\u003c/em\u003e course shifting that area remarked as a famous trading center and nodal point for business purposes. Berhampore Municipality was established in 1876 which had 16.19 sq.km occupied area (Roy et al., 2021). In the very beginning, the British Government did not leave the governance of this municipality completely in the hand of Non Government folks as after Sipoy Mutiny in 1857, a large number British army people stayed at Berhamopore Cantonment area. Therefore the Municipality was constituted with both the government and non government peoples. The municipal board was constituted by, 14 non-governmental members and 5 government nominated members, total 19 members. This trend was continued up to 1884.The District Magistrate acted as the President of the Municipality during this tenure. In the year 1884, according to \u0026ldquo;Bengal Municipal Act 1876\u0026rdquo;, finally the Administration and management of Berhampore Municipality was handed over to 14 elected and 5 governments nominated members. The first Chairman of Berhampore Municipality was Ray Bahadur Baikunthanath Sen, who was a reputed Advocate and the President of District Bar Association as well. That time the area of Berhampore Municipality was divided into 6 wards i.e. 1) Gorabazar 2) Cantonment 3) Berhampore 4) Khagra 5) Saidabad and 6) Cossimbazar. The numbers of elected members from each ward were as follows, 3 from Gorabazar,1 from Cantonment,4 from Berhampore ,3 from Khagra,2 from Saidabad and 1 member from Cossimbazar ward. It is the district head quarter of Murshidabad (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.berhamporemunicipality.org.in/\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.2\u003c/span\u003e showing the continuous population growth in Berhampore municipality from 1901 to 2011 with R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value demarked as highly positive population growth. Now the Municipality is comprised of 25 wards and one elected member from each ward. Total area of this municipality is 31.42 sq.km. and it has a population of 1,95,223 (Census,2011). In year 1901 the population was 24397 and it becomes 55613 in year 1951. But after 1971, the population growth rate of this municipality is going higher. The town is primarily a service town having a population of 1,95,223 as per 2011 census, with an overall population density 6213 persons per sq km. The decadal growth rate over the last five decades varies from 16.51 to 36.12. Highest decadal growth had been founded in 2001 census which was recorded as 36.12 and present decadal growth is 21.91 in 2011 census. In that case we found a negative decadal growth according to their value because high price of land in municipal area, trafficking as a common problem, so lots of people come and settled down surrounding the municipal area to ensure the uses of all urban services from their locality. Within a decade numbers of census towns are increased from 3 to 9 surrounding Berhampore municipality in 2001 census we found that Kasim Bazar, Gora Bazar and Goaljan but in 2011 rest of three more six census town has been added those are Banjetia, Sibdanga badarpur, Gopjan, Chaltia, Haridasmati and Ajodhyanagar. Those nine census towns are well bonded the municipality allover direction. Surrounded villages are converted into urban space within a very short time.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec18\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1.5.1.2. Degree of urbanization\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe degree of urbanization generally refers to the relative or absolute number of people who live in places defined as urban (Kundu, 2013).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDegree of Urbanization =\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{Urban Population}{Total Population}*100\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e= (195223 / 446887)*100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e=\u0026thinsp;43.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec19\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.1.3. \u003cstrong\u003eSpeed of Urbanization\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThis index shows the annual rate of change in the number of population in the town (Kundu, 2013).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpeed of Urbanization = \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\(\\frac{(X-Y)}{Y}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e * 100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e[where, X\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Present Census year Population\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e= {(195223\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;160143)/160143}*100 Y\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Previous Census year Population]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e=\u0026thinsp;21.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec20\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.1.4. \u003cstrong\u003ePopulation Projection\u003c/strong\u003e:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt is an estimate of a future population. It is fraught with uncertainties as there is no fixed law of population increment and various techniques of projections are to give a generalized result (Mandal, 2000). It is a sign of economic development and cultural advancement of an urban center (Roy et al.,2021).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePopulation Projection:\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011 census\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;195223, 2001 census\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;160143\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003er = (195223\u0026ndash;160143)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35080\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP.2021\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2011 + (r* 10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e=\u0026thinsp;546023\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP.2031\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;896823\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP.2041\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1052400\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec21\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.2. LULC\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOne of the most significant processes related to the deterioration of the earth\u0026rsquo;s natural ecosystem have been regarded by Land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics. Rapid urbanization has become a key challenge for the future urban sustainability. LULC maps of Berhampore town highlighting the spatial distribution of land use and land cover areas based on the images from 1991 to 2021. The below figures \u003cspan class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"Underline\"\u003e(\u003c/span\u003eFig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"Underline\"\u003e)\u003c/span\u003eillustrate the fact that there was a significant difference in the land use and land cover among the North-Western, South, and South Western parts of the Berhampore municipality area. Changing land characteristics from one to over time due to human-induced transformation activities were referred to as land use and land cover transformation. Land features are in a constant state of transition from one type to another, based on local environmental suitability and local people\u0026rsquo;s requirements.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab11\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.11\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different LULC in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLULC CLASSIFICATION\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA COVER\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLULC CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArea (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWATERBODY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.92\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-6.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-9.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVEGETATION\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-5.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-18.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-7.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-28.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOPEN AREA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.81\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBUILTUP AREA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e71.92\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.79\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"17\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLULC types (vegetation cover, and water body ) shows decreasing trends, and rest of two other LULC types built up area show increasing trends but in case of open area highlight the feature continuous decreasing trend from 1991 to 2011 but in 2021 it becomes positive change \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. The statistical result indicates that the most land in Berhampore municipality was covered by built up area; 33.29% in 1991, 60.08% in 2001, 66.8% in 2011 and 71.92% in 2021 followed and vegetation 48.31% in 1991, 30.17% in 2001, 27.68% in 2011and 19.69% in 2021, another special land cover feature of lulc map is waterbody 11.58% in 1991, 5.47%in 2001,2.48% in 2011 and 1.97% in 2021. The greatest decline was found for vegetation; a total number of 28.62% of area of vegetation cover loss after that waterbody also decline with 9.61% of its own area and maximum agglomeration of built up area nearly 38.63% of area were observed in Berhampore municipality area during the study period.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLand use land cover classification was done in the study area under the supervised classification method using maximum likelihood algorithm. On the basis of the number of pixels, the area of each class was calculated. Based on the land use land cover map of 1991\u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 11.58% (3.64 sq.km.), vegetation cover 48.31% (15.18 sq.km.), open area 6.81% (2.14 sq.km.) and built up area 33.29% ( 10.46 sq.km.). In the land use land cover map of 2001 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 5.47% (1.72 sq.km.), vegetation cover 30.17% (9.48 sq.km.), open area 4.26% (1.34 sq.km.) and built up area 60.08% (18.88 sq.km.). In the land use land cover map of 2011 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 2.48% (0.78sq.km.), vegetation cover 27.68% (8.7 sq.km.), open area 3.02% (0.95 sq.km.) and built up area 66.8% (20.99sq.km.) and the final land use land cover map of 2021 the area and percentage of areas as classified are water body 1.97% (0.62 sq.km.), vegetation cover 19.69% (6.18 sq.km.), open area 6.42% (2.02 sq.km.) and built up area 71.92% (22.6sq.km.). The dominant land use class was defined as built up area, and the land cover type was classified as vegetation cover in (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldUnderline\"\u003e)\u003c/span\u003e, which carried out the part of the dominant landuse and landcover type of the study area.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec22\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.2.1. Water body\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn the study area water bodies mainly consists of lakes, ponds and tanks, etc. One major river Bhagirathi which is flows towards the western boundary of Berhampore municipality from north to south direction. Many tanks and ponds are also found in the region \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eFig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\" type=\"BoldUnderline\"\u003e)\u003c/span\u003e. The area included in this category, 1991 was 3.64 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 11.58 % f the total area, 1.72\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 5.47 % in 201, 0.78 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 2.48 % in 2011of the total area and 0.62\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, 2021 which accounts for 1.97% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of water body continuous decreases according to time nearly 3.02 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e or 9.61 percentage of area and according to R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value of waterbody is 0.865. As a result, it indicates the level of significance of the rate of gradually decreasing waterbody over time \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec23\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.2.2. Vegetation cover\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDense vegetation can be observed in the East, North East and South-East parts of the region (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. Some patches of forest cover seen in the Central and North-West parts. The area included in this category, 1991 was 15.18 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 48.31 % f the total area, 9.48\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 30.17 % in 201, 8.7 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 27.68 % in 2011of the total area and 6.18\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, in 2021 which accounts for 19.69% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of vegetation cover continuous decreases according to time nearly 9 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e or 28.62 percentage of area and according to R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value of vegetation cover is 0.89. It indicates the rate of extensive decreasement about vegetation cover within study time \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec24\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.2.3. Open area\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn urban sector open space mainly identified as Stadium, Play Ground, Park, Recreational spot and Project area under construction. The area included in this category, 1991 was 2.14 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 6.81 % f the total area, 1.34\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 4.26 % in 201, 0.95 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003ewhich accounts for 3.02 % in 2011of the total area and 2.02\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, in 2021 which accounts for 6.42% of total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of open area continuous decreases according to time from 1991 to 2011 but in the year of 2021 it turns on positive growth (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. Generally natural open area mainly helps for recreational and ground water infiltration process but the passage of times this natural open area also converted urban sector and few of them remain static (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. According to R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value of open area is 0.03. So it is indicate the low positive value and show its significant level of complexness of open area within study time.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section4\" id=\"Sec25\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.2.4. Built-up area\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn urban sector builtup area mainly identify as Residential, Commercial and Services lands etc. Accordingly, the area included in this category in 1991 is 10.46\u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, which accounts for 33.29 % o the total area, 18.88 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e which accounts for 60.08 % in 201, 20.99 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e which accounts for 66.8 % of the otal area, and 22.6 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e in 2021, which accounts for 71.92% of the total area receptively. So, it is clearly indicate that from 1991 to 2021 amount of vegetation cover continuous increase according to time nearly 12.14 \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({km}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e or 38.63 percentage of area respectively (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. The growth of Builtup area mainly transform from western part to all round the municipal area (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. According to R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value of open area is 0.84. So it is indicate the highly positive value and show significant level of development of builtup area within study time.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec26\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.3. NDWI:\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAmong the natural Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), water body is a major feature of Berhampore municipal area. Water body is mainly high in the core areas of the city which is gradually decreases towards periphery of town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab12\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.12\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different NDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDWI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026lt; -0.16(LOW)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.16 - -0.07 (MEDIUM)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-4.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.07- 0.01(HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45.53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-7.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01(VERY HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.37\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo investigate the nature and patterns of Water body in Berhampore town, NDWI indices have been done. NDWI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDWI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.12\u003c/span\u003e) are classified into four categories such as \u0026lt; -0.16 is low, -0.16 \u0026ndash; -0.07 is medium, -0.07\u0026ndash;0.01 is high and \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 10.12, 9.51, 7.63 and 6.52 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDWI values and 24.37,20.94,17.14 and 16.04 percent experiences very high NDWI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDWI are gradually decrease over the time.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab13\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.13\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDispersion of NDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAXIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMINIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEAN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrom the NDWI images (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.9\u003c/span\u003e) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.13\u003c/span\u003e), it has been found that values for NDWI ranges from +\u0026thinsp;0.05 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.28, 0.04 to -0.29, 0.02 to -0.3 and 0.01 to -0.33 respectively. Highest value of NDWI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc. In another hand amount of low value of NDWI are mainly found in the area of core urban space and West, North West, South West part of town (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.9\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt indicates that the proportion of waterbody in the city area has decreased from their mean value \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.11 in 1991 while it decreased by \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.16 in 2021(Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.10\u003c/span\u003e). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDWI and \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({r}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e value is 0.979 that means it\u0026rsquo;s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the water cover of town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec27\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.4. NDBI\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAmong the manmade Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), builtup area is a major feature of Berhampore municipal area. Builtup is mainly high in the core areas of the city which is gradually increases towards periphery of town in an even distribution.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab14\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.14\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different NDBI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDBI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026lt; -0.07(LOW)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e35.80522\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e29.21706\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.62062\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.59707\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.07 - -0.02(MEDIUM)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.07957\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.67091\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.86696\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.14004\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-5.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.02- 0.03(HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.05092\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.95226\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.09803\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.57543\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-4.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-6.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.03 (VERY HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.06429\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.15977\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.41439\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.68746\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo investigate the nature and patterns of Builtup area in Berhampore town, NDBI indices have been done. NDBI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDBI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.14\u003c/span\u003e) are classified into four categories such as \u0026lt; -0.07 is low, -0.07 \u0026ndash; -0.02 is medium, -0.02\u0026ndash;0.03 is high and \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.03 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 35.80, 29.21, 25.62 and 22.59 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDBI values and 19.06,19.15,19.41 and 20.68 percent experiences very high NDBI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDBI are gradually increase over the time due to their functionality.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab15\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.15\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDispersion of NDBI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAXIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMINIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEAN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2404163\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2828427\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.4101219\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.4808326\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrom the NDBI images (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.15\u003c/span\u003e), it has been found that values for NDBI ranges from +\u0026thinsp;0.12 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.22, 0.15 to -0.25, 0.3 to -0.28 and 0.38 to -0.3 respectively. Highest value of NDBI are mainly found in central part of the town such urban area available here those are Khagra, Saidabad, Gorabazar, Indropostha, Dayanagar, Cossimbazar and Kadai etc. In another hand amount of low value of NDBI are mainly found in the area of periphery urban space and East and South East part of town (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt indicates that the proportion of buildup area in the city area has increased from their mean value \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.05 in 1991 while it increased by 0.04 in 2021(Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.12\u003c/span\u003e). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDBI and \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({r}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e value is 0.896 that means it\u0026rsquo;s highly correlated the matter according to time increasing the rate of urban space of town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec28\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.5. MNDWI\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes built-up area features that are often correlated with open water in other indices.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab16\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.16\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different MNDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMNDWI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026lt; -0.15(LOW)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.15 - -0.07(MEDIUM)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-17.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-5.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-5.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-28.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.07- 0.01(HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01(VERY HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo examine the nature, patterns and accuracy of Water body in Berhampore town, MNDWI indices have been done. MNDWI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the MNDWI index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.16\u003c/span\u003e) are classified into four categories such as \u0026lt; -0.15 is low, -0.15 \u0026ndash; -0.07 is medium, -0.07\u0026ndash;0.01 is high and \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 14.89, 15.27, 12.73 and 10.98 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low MNDWI values and 8.4, 6.17, 4.64 and 3.24 percent experiences very high MNDWI values. It is clearly indicated the value of MNDWI are gradually decrease over the time because of main water body are remain static under supervision by Berhampore Municipality but others bill fall in a great danger because of promoting raj those wetland converted into a vertical residential project.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab17\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.17\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDispersion of MNDWI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAXIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMINIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEAN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.065\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrom the MNDWI images (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.13\u003c/span\u003e) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.17\u003c/span\u003e), it have been found that values for MNDWI ranges from 0.16 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.26, 0.15 to -0.28, 0.09 to -0.29 and 0.07 to -0.25 respectively. Highest value of MNDWI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc(Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.13\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt indicates that the proportion of modified water body in the city area has decreased from their mean value \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.05 in 1991 while it increased by \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.09 in 2021\u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eFig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.14\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. This diagram mainly plot of mean value of MNDWI and \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({r}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e value is 0.765 that means it\u0026rsquo;s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the rate of water body in town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec29\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.6. NDPI\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt is used for the enhancement of open water features. It also diminishes the pond area features that are often correlated with open water.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab18\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.18\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different NDPI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDPI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026lt; -0.05(LOW)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-4.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.79\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-10.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.05\u0026ndash;0.05(MEDIUM)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-6.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.05\u0026ndash;0.1(HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e43.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1(VERY HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the nature, patterns of Pond or Stagnant water content in Berhampore town, NDPI indices have been done. NDPI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDPI I index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.18\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003eare classified into four categories such as \u0026lt; -0.05 is low, -0.05\u0026ndash;0.05 is medium, 0.05\u0026ndash;0.1 is high and \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 9.61, 11.71, 15.94 and 19.73 percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDPI values and 28.51, 25.77, 23.74 and 22.31 percent experiences very high NDPI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDPI are gradually decrease over the time because unplanned rapid urbanization.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab19\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.19\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDispersion of NDPI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAXIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMINIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEAN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.065\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.055\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrom the NDPI images \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eFig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.15\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.19\u003c/span\u003e), it have been found that values for NDPI ranges from 0.29 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.09, 0.25 to -0.07, 0.28 to -0.15 and 0.27 to -0.16 respectively. Highest value of NDPI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, and Shilpo taluk etc \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eFig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.15\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e. Rest of those pond or lakes remain in great danger. Due to purpose proper urban management municipality are working with important lakes to maintain their health.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt indicates that the proportion of open pond in the city area has decreased from their mean value 0.1 in 1991 while it decreased by 0.05 in 2021(Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.16\u003c/span\u003e). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDPI and \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({r}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e value is 0.96 that means it\u0026rsquo;s highly correlated the matter according to time decreasing the rate of water body and it\u0026rsquo;s health in town because of improper management of water body all over the town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"Section3\" id=\"Sec30\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e1.5.7. NDTI\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAs turbidity level of water increases due the increase in the suspended particles in the water, the reflectance of the red band more than that of the green band (Islam et.al., 2006).The NDTI allows the detection of high turbidity (low clarity) water cover \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eLacaux et al., 2007).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab20\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.20\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArea under different NDTI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDTI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"8\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAREA CHANGE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u0026ndash;2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u0026ndash;2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAREA (Sq.Km.)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026lt; -0.03(LOW)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-7.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-0.03\u0026ndash;0(MEDIUM)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e51.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0\u0026ndash;0.03(HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.88\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.03(VERY HIGH)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo find out the turbidity nature of Pond or Stagnant water content in Berhampore town, NDTI indices have been done. NDTI indices have been done over the years from 1991 to 2021. Distribution of the NDTI I index in Berhampore between 1991 and 2021 (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.20\u003c/span\u003e) are classified into four categories such as \u0026lt; -0.03 is low, -0.03\u0026ndash;0 is medium, 0\u0026ndash;0.03 is high and \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.03 is very high zone. In 1991,2001,2011 and 2021; 3.24,6.17,9.38 and 10.13percent of the total Berhampore experiences very low NDTI values and 5.47,5.25,4.83 and 4.45 percent experiences very high NDTI values. It is clearly indicated the value of NDTI are gradually decrease over the time because of implementation of various scheme to modification drainage system. Due to this turbidity rate of main lake remain minimize.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab21\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.21\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDispersion of NDTI in Berhampore Municipality from 1991 to 2021\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMAXIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMINIMUM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMEAN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrom the NDTI images (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.17\u003c/span\u003e) of Berhampore town of 1991, 2001, 2011 and 2021 (\u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;1.21\u003c/strong\u003e), it has been found that values for NDTI ranges from 0.03 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.09, 0.03 to -0.05, 0.05 to -0.06 and 0.04 to -0.04 respectively. Highest value of NDTI are mainly found in central part of the town such lakes area and open space land available here those are Bishnupur bill, Chatrar bill, Laldighi, Dhobighat, Minbhaban, Shilpo taluk and open land surface area etc (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.17\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIt indicates that the proportion of open pond in the city area has decreased from their mean value \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.03 in 1991 while it increased by 0 in 2021(Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.18\u003c/span\u003e). This diagram mainly plot of mean value of NDTI and \u003cspan class=\"InlineEquation\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"mathinline\"\u003e\\({r}^{2}\\)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e value is 0.869 that means it\u0026rsquo;s correlated the matter according to time increasing the rate of turbidity in water body and open surface in town because of improper management of water body and open surface by the process of illegal dumping of solid waste and modification of drainage system it may accelerate the process of eutrophication and environmental degradation in particular features of earth all over the town.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec31\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026apos;Urbanization\u0026apos; was defined as the dynamic growth of people in urban areas over a specific period of time. Total population of Berhampore municipality was 195223 according to census of India, 2011 and municipal area nearly was 31.42 sq.km. From the study, it has been found that water body has been decreased very fast and another path of landuse rapidly increases in urban area. NDWI maps shows that water body area is high in the peripheral areas than the central part of town areas or urban areas in 1991but due to process of human encroachments of the urban area over the waterbody. In the core of urban area some major wetland remain static which is controlled by municipality. On the other hand, NDBI index is higher towards the city areas than the outwards of city center. Loss of wetland nearly 3.02 sq.km area and 9.61 percentage of area during the study time \u003cstrong\u003e(\u003c/strong\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e.According to Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1.20\u003c/span\u003e showing the rate of transformation land from waterbody to builtup area according to time, in 1991\u0026ndash;2001 0.9sq.km.area, in 2001\u0026ndash;2011 0.4sq.km. area and in 2011\u0026ndash;2021 0.2 sq.km. area rapidly changed during the process of unplanned urbanization and R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value is 0.97 which is highly support that the event. Which was remarkable change within small city town it also triggered urban flood, ground water depletion risk in the city.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab22\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.22\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePearson\u0026rsquo;s Correlations among NDWI, NDBI, NDTI, NDPI \u0026amp; MNDWI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVARIABLE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDWI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDBI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDTI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNDPI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMNDWI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab23\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1.23\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLinear regression model of study variables\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYEAR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVARIABLE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eR SQUARE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eADJUSTED R SQUARE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSTANDARD ERROR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSTANDARD COFFICIENT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003et\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ep\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1991\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.165\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.786\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-3.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.457\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.457\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e107.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.457\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.457\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e106.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.676\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2001\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.146\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-2.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e102.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.476\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.475\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.456\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e32.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.987\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.787\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.235\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.156\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.053\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.443\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.443\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.37\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-31.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.37\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2021\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDBI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.506\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.575\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDTI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNDPI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e143.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.736\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMNDWI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e143.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.736\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSource: Prepared by Authors, 2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSummarizes the results of the bi variate correlations and linear regression model (\u003cstrong\u003eTable1.22 \u0026amp; 1.23\u003c/strong\u003e) among study variables in the observed period of 30 years (1991\u0026ndash;2021).\u0026nbsp;In this diagram mainly identify the relationship among study variables in the observed period of 30 years (1991\u0026ndash;2021) (\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 1.19\u003c/strong\u003e). It is clearly identified that Built up and waterbody represent an inverse relationship. \u0026nbsp;During the time of 1991 correlation value was 0.17 (low positive ) because this phase identify the first footmark of outgrowth of city and within 30years time span that relationship dramatically changed was 0.53 ( medium to high positive ) so that value identify the massive change or transformation of city from waterbody to builtup area. \u0026nbsp;In case of NDPI and NDBI shows the actual condition urban growth and stagnant waterbody of the city, correlation value was 0.61 in 1991 which was converted into 0.18 in 2021. In another sense the inter relationship between NDBI and NDTI also increases from1991 to 2021, in 1991 value was 0.35 and in 2021 value was 0.73. So, all the indicators are helps to correlate our objectives the growth of urban space hamper the number and health of stagnant water body in Berhampore town. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe study examined the impact of LULC on NDBI,NDWI,NDPI, NDTI and MNDWI in Berhampore town , from 1991 to 2021.In order to determine the association between study variables and the four land cover indices, a linear regression model (LRM) was applied where NDWI consider as constant. During the study periods, Berhampore experienced significant LULC changes; the built-up area, which has expanded by 12.14 sq.km. as a result of population growth and urbanization. In contrast, waterbody were showed a decreasing trend and decreased by 3.02 sq.km. during the study period respectively. Additionally, during the studies 30 year period the study variables had a statistically significant relationship with rapid urbanization.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn Berhampore town wetlands constitute a special ecosystem nurturing a large variety of flora and fauna and it is used as multiple systems. Peripheral households directly and indirectly are utilized the wetlands.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLocal habitats surrounding the wetlands are classified into two categories according to their uses, such as - (a) \u003cem\u003eBed village\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand (b) \u003cem\u003eBelt\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003evillage\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eBed villages\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eare located at the immediate vicinity around the wetlands whose are intimately linked with the wetland functions. On the other, \u003cem\u003eBelt villages\u003c/em\u003e are located a away from locality, who exploit wetlands especially for major commercial purpose \u003cem\u003e(Seshavatharam, 1992)\u003c/em\u003e. Generally wetlands have lots of functionality in urban space of Berhampore town such as recycle nutrients, purify water, control storm water and floods, maintain stream flow, recharge ground water, providing drinking water, fish culture , control rate of runoff in urban area, Green-blue infrastructures (GBI) is presented as a strategy to deal with climate change in urban areas, Bishnupur Bill has a spiritual value and recreational center of the society.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe interaction between man and wetlands during the last few decades has been of disturb largely due to the rapid population growth in Berhampore. So, domestic and industrial wastes are leading pollutant of wetlands in town (commercial and residential site). Presently, we are overlooked the values of wetland and we are belonging in a particular profit maximum state of mind as a result wetlands remain in a great danger. Lots of problem are arise due to unplanned urbanization such as \u0026ndash; quality of water decrease as well as biodiversity loss, \u0026nbsp;the aquatic or lentic ecosystem, are hamper by solid waste disposal, sewerage ,waste water disposal and plays of various religious and cultural\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eactivities along the wetland zone, ground water depletion, removal of water bodies has led to the decline in water table due encroachment of natural drains, by construction of vertical residential project, removal of vegetative cover, reclamation of wetlands are the prime reasons for frequent flooding even during normal rainfall post 2000.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWetlands are not delineated under any specific administrative jurisdiction of central as well as state government . The primary responsibility for the management of these ecosystems is in the hands of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. Although some wetlands are protected after the formulation of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act \u0026ndash; 1974 \u0026amp; 1977 but this is not enough to protect the urban wetland. We must need of Government cooperation along with the local community and corporate sector to come together for an effective management plan to control promoting raj in urban sector. To ensure sustainable success in the protection of wetlands, awareness among the general public, educational and corporate institutions must be created with strict legislation and\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eenvironment impact assessment needed for major development projects highlighting threats to wetlands need to be formulated. To minimize these problems city administrative authorities should take immediate measures. The findings suggest that policymakers in Berhampore town should be worried about future urban expansion and develop a comprehensive plan for environmentally friendly constriction. The study also revealed that urban wetland can help in improving the overall urban life and sustainable environment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding - \u003c/strong\u003eThis work was not supported financially.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest\u003c/strong\u003e - The authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability Data of the study were collected from the following sources\u003c/strong\u003e –\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ehttps://earthexplorer.usgs.gov, https://censusindia.gov.in, http://www.berhamporemunicipality.org.in/\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements – \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Tapas Das (Faculty, Department of Geography, Nahata JNMS Mahavidyalaya) for his valuable assistance to formulate this paper .\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbd El-Kawya OR, R\u0026oslash;d JK, Ismail HA, Suliman AS. Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data. Appl Geogr. 2011;31:483\u0026ndash;494. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622810001451\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622810001451\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAgnoletti, M., \u0026amp; Rotherham, I. D. (2015). Landscape and biocultural diversity. \u003cem\u003eBiodivers Conservation, 25\u003c/em\u003e, 3155\u0026ndash;3165. https://link.springer.com/article/\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s10531-015-1003-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10531-015-1003-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlikhani, S., Nummi, P., \u0026amp; Ojala, A. (2021). Urban Wetlands: A Review on Ecological and Cultural Values. \u003cem\u003eWater, 13\u003c/em\u003e (3301), 01\u0026ndash;47. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/w13223301\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/w13223301\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBassi, N., Kumar, M.D., Sharma, A., \u0026amp; Saradhi, P.P. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.\u003c/em\u003e Vol. 2, pp. 1\u0026ndash;19. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhattacharya, S., Mukherjee, K., \u0026amp; Garg, J. (2000). \u003cem\u003eWetlands of West Bengal.\u003c/em\u003e Kolkata: Institute of Wetland Management and Ecological Design.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrinkmann, K., Hoffmann, E., \u0026amp; Buerkert, A. (2020). Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of UrbanWetlands in an Indian Megacity over the Past 50 Years. \u003cem\u003eRemote Sensing, 12\u003c/em\u003e (662), 01\u0026ndash;33. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040662\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs12040662\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCampbell, J. B. (1996). Introduction to remote sensing (2nd ed.).London: Taylor and Francis.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCensus handbook of Murshidabad district : 1991, 2001 and 2011.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChatterjee, U., \u0026amp; Majumdar, S. (2021). Impact of land use change and rapid urbanization on urban heat island in Kolkata city: A remote sensing based perspective. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Urban Management\u003c/em\u003e .\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCongalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35\u0026ndash;46. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, M., \u0026amp; Das, A. (2019 ). Dynamics of Urbanization and its impact on Urban Ecosystem Services (UESs): A study of a medium size town of West Bengal, Eastern India. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Urban Management\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, S., \u0026amp; Sahu, A. S. (2020). Monitoring Landuse/ Landcover Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Casestudy on Kanchrapara Municipality and Its Adjoining area, WestBengal,India. \u003cem\u003eRegional Science Inquiry, XII\u003c/em\u003e (2), 43\u0026ndash;54 \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2020/3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2020/3\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, T. M. (2000). \u003cem\u003eDegradation of water bodies and wetlands in West Bengal: Interaction with economic development.\u003c/em\u003e Kolkata, West Bengal: EERC Working paper series.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, T., Jana, A., Mandal, B., \u0026amp; Sutradhar, A. (2021, November). Spatio-temporal pattern of land use and land cover and its effects on land surface temperature using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Bhubaneswar city,Eastern India (1991\u0026ndash;2021). \u003cem\u003eSpringer : GeoJournal\u003c/em\u003e. \"\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z\"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z\u0026quot;\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/sl10708-021-10541-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe, N. K., \u0026amp; Jana, N. C.(1997). \u003cem\u003eThe Land Multifaced Appraisal and Management.\u003c/em\u003e Calcutta: Sribhumi Publication Company.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeng, J. S., Wang, K., Hong, Y., \u0026amp; Qi, J. G. (2009). Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. \u003cem\u003eLandscape and Urban Planning\u003c/em\u003e, 187\u0026ndash;198.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDumax, N., \u0026amp; Rozan, A. (2021). Valuation of the environmental benefits induced by a constructed wetland. \u003cem\u003eWetlands Ecology Management\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09811-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11273-021-09811-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGhermandi, A., van den Bergh, J., Brander, L. M., de Groot, H., \u0026amp; Nunes, P. (2008). The Economic Value Of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-Analysis. \u003cem\u003eSSRN\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;20. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1273002_code114544.pdf?abstractid=1273002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1273002_code114544.pdf?abstractid=1273002\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIslam,M., \u0026amp; Sado.K.( 2006). Analyses of ASTER and Spectroradiometer data with \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e measurements for turbidity and transparency study of lake Abashri, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Geoinformatics. Vol.\u003c/em\u003e 2. 31\u0026ndash;45.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJensen, J. R. (1996). Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall Inc.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJensen, J. R., \u0026amp; Cowen, D. C. (1999). Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 65,611\u0026ndash;622. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/99journal/may/1999_may_611-622\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/99journal/may/1999_may_611-622\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhorram, S., Nelson, S., Cakir, H., \u0026amp; Wiele, C. V. (2013). Digital Image Processing: Post-processing and Data Integration. (J. N. Pelton, S. Madry, \u0026amp; S. C. Lara, Eds.) Handbook of Satellite Applications, Springer, 839\u0026ndash;862. https://link.springer.com/referencework/\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/978-1-4419-7671-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-4419-7671-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKiran, R., \u0026amp; Ramachandra, T.V. (1999). Status of wetlands in Bangalore and its conservationaspects. \u003cem\u003eENVIS Journal of Human Settlements\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 16\u0026ndash;24. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/water/paper/status_wetlands/status_wetlands.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/water/paper/status_wetlands/status_wetlands.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKundu, T. (2013). Urbanization in the South - East Resource Region of India - A Case Study of Jharkhand, Orissa and Chattisgarh : 1901\u0026ndash;2001. (N. C. Jana, \u0026amp; L. Sivaramakrishnan, Eds.) \u003cem\u003eReources and Development Issues and Concerns\u003c/em\u003e, 280\u0026ndash;298.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar, R. (2010, November). Integrated Management Planning for East Kolkata Wetlands. \u003cem\u003eEast Kolkata Wetlands\u003c/em\u003e. South Asia: East Kolkata Wetlands Management Authority \u0026amp; Wetlands International. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.ekwma.in/ek/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NewsletterVolume1.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.ekwma.in/ek/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NewsletterVolume1.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar S, Merwade V, James LK, Niyogi D (2013) Evaluation of temperature and precipitation trends and long term persistence, in CMIPs twentieth-century climate simulations. 26:4168\u0026ndash;4185 \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluation-of-Temperature-and-Precipitation-Trends-Kumar-Merwade/d36eb6de6eca2eb1511bb7c15d64bd553950aac8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluation-of-Temperature-and-Precipitation-Trends-Kumar-Merwade/d36eb6de6eca2eb1511bb7c15d64bd553950aac8\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLacaux, J. P., Tourre, Y. M., Vignolles, C., Ndione, J. A., \u0026amp; Lafaye, M. (2007). Classification of ponds from high-spatial resolution remote sensing:Application to Rift Valley Fever epidemics in Senegal. \u003cem\u003eRemote Sensing of Environment, 106\u003c/em\u003e, 66\u0026ndash;74. https://doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcFEETERS, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 17\u003c/em\u003e (7), 1425\u0026ndash;1432. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169608948714\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01431169608948714\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcFeeters, S. K. (2013). Using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) within a Geographic Information System to Detect Swimming Pools for Mosquito Abatement: A Practical Approach. \u003cem\u003eRemote Sensing, 5\u003c/em\u003e, 3544\u0026ndash;3561. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/5/7/3544\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/5/7/3544\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMitsch, W.J., \u0026amp; Gosselink, J.G. (1993). \u003cem\u003eWetlands, 2nd edition.\u003c/em\u003e New York: John Wiley.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRamachandra, T. (2001). Restoration and Management Strategies of Wetlands in developing countries. \u003cem\u003eElectronic Green Journel.\u003c/em\u003e Vol 1 (13), pp. 1\u0026ndash;18. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://escholarship.org/content/qt22f875tq/qt22f875tq.pdf?t=li4xjt\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://escholarship.org/content/qt22f875tq/qt22f875tq.pdf?t=li4xjt\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRamsar Convention Secretariat. (2010). \u003cem\u003eWise Use of Wetlands: Concepts and Approaches for the Wise Use of Wetlands. (Ramsar Handbook for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th ed., Vol.1.\u003c/em\u003e Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoy, S. K., \u0026amp; Biswas, S. (2021). Transformation of Berhampore Municipal Surrounding Area from Concentric Zone to Multiple Nuclei Zones. \u003cem\u003eTerritorio Della Ricercasu Insediamenti E Ambiente International Journal Of Urban Planning\u003c/em\u003e. 26 (1/2021) 97\u0026ndash;112/https://DOI.\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.6092/2281-4574/8267\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.6092/2281-4574/8267\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRwanga, S. S. \u0026amp; Ndambuki, J. M. (2017). \u0026ldquo;Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS.\u0026rdquo; International Journal of Geosciences. Accuracy. (8): 611\u0026ndash;622. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4236/ijg.2017.84033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSarkar, U. K., \u0026amp; Borah, B. C. (2017). Flood plain wetland fisheries of India: with special reference to impact of climate change.\u003cem\u003eWetlandsEcologyManagement\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/318164151\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318164151\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchober, P., \u0026amp; Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763\u0026ndash;1768. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchuyt, K., \u0026amp; Brander, L. (2004). \u003cem\u003eLiving Waters, Conserving the Source of Life: The Economic Values of the Worlds Wetlands.\u003c/em\u003e Gland/Amsterdam: WWF.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eScott, D. A. (1989). \u003cem\u003eA Directory of Asian Wetlands .\u003c/em\u003e IUCN.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSenthilnathan, S. (2019). Usefulness of Correlation Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009(July). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416918\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2139/ssrn.3416918\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeshavatharam, V. (1992). Ecological Status of Kolleru lake: A review. In K. Chatrath, \u003cem\u003eWetlands of India\u003c/em\u003e. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House, pp. 171\u0026ndash;200.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma ( Sarkar), S. (2012). Trend of Urbanisation in Berhampore Municipality: A Geographical Analysis. \u003cem\u003eGeo-Analyst, 2\u003c/em\u003e (2), 49\u0026ndash;56.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh, K. V., Setia, R., Sahoo, S., Prasad, A., \u0026amp; Pateriya, B. (2014). Evaluation of NDWI and MNDWI for assessment of waterlogging by integrating digital elevation model and groundwater level. \u003cem\u003eGeocarto International\u003c/em\u003e, 01\u0026ndash;12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.965757\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10106049.2014.965757\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpace Application Centre. (2010). \u003cem\u003eNational Wetland Atlas: West Bengal.\u003c/em\u003e Ahmedabad: ISRO,MoEF, Govt. of India, p. 46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStewart, P., Neice, P., \u0026amp; Rubec C \u0026amp; Taylor, I. (1996). \u003cem\u003eThe Federal Policy on wetland conservation Implementation Guide for Federal Land Managers.\u003c/em\u003e Ottawa, Ontario: Wildlife Conservation Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://nawcc.wetlandnetwork.ca/Fed%20Policy%20Wetland%20Conserv_Implement%20Guide%20for%20Fed%20Land%20Mgrs.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://nawcc.wetlandnetwork.ca/Fed%20Policy%20Wetland%20Conserv_Implement%20Guide%20for%20Fed%20Land%20Mgrs.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTiner, R. (1996). Wetland definitions and classifications in the United States. In J. W. Fretwell, \u003cem\u003eNational Water Summary on Wetland Resources\u003c/em\u003e. Washington D.C.: United States Geological Survey. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.fws.gov/northeast/ecologicalservices/pdf/wetlands/Tech%20Aspects%20Wetland%20Definitions%20and%20Classifcation%20in%20the%20US.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.fws.gov/northeast/ecologicalservices/pdf/wetlands/Tech%20Aspects%20Wetland%20Definitions%20and%20Classifcation%20in%20the%20US.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTiner, R. (1999). \u003cem\u003eWetland indicators: A guide to wetland identification, Delineation,Classification and mapping.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTucker, C. J., \u0026amp; Sellers, P. J. (2007). Satellite remote sensing of primary production. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 7\u003c/em\u003e (11), 1395\u0026ndash;1416. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948944\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01431168608948944\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTurner, R. K., Bergh, J. C., Barendregt, T. S., Straaten, J. v., Maltby, E., \u0026amp; Ierland, E.C. (2000). Ecological Economic Analysis of Wetlands: Scientific Integration for Management and Policy. \u003cem\u003eEcological Economics- Special Issue on The Values of Wetlands: Landscape and Institutional Perspectives\u003c/em\u003e, 7\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.203.502\u0026amp;rep=rep1\u0026amp;type=pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.203.502\u0026amp;rep=rep1\u0026amp;type=pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu, H. (2006). Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 27\u003c/em\u003e (14), 3025\u0026ndash;3033. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/01431160600589179\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01431160600589179\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZha, Y., Gao, J., \u0026amp; Ni, S. (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 24\u003c/em\u003e (3), 583\u0026ndash;594. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160304987\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01431160304987\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao, J. (2013). The impact on Personality knowledge sharing of personality traits: organizational trust as intermediary variable. Information Studies:Theory \u0026amp; Application, 36(5), 34\u0026ndash;38. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://search.ebscohost.com/login\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://search.ebscohost.com/login\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Berhampore town, Landuse \u0026 landcover change, Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Built up Area Index, Normalized Difference Turbidity Index, Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Urbanization, Wetland","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWetlands play a vital role in environmental protection. Wetland works not only as kidney of environment but also they provide us water storage, urban flood control, recharge of groundwater, water purifications, agricultural facilities, wildlife resource management, and recreation spots. In present day rapid unplanned urbanization process is shooting low risky high profitable zone wetland areas because of huge amount population pressure in urban sector and lack of awareness about environmental protection. Berhampore town is one of the important towns which is located in the Murshidabad district of West Bengal and express rapid urban growth. Because of the rapid unplanned urban growth land use and land cover are changing very rapidly within very short time gap which may impacts on the local land resources. Through this paper we want to show the present day scenario of Wetlands in municipality area, how wetlands are affected by unplanned urbanization directly or indirectly with the help of landuse landcover change, we are also using some indices to summarized present actual relation between wetland and built up area. To find out the present scenario wetland and built up area of Berhampore town Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Built up Area Index, Modified Normalized Difference Wetland Index, Normalized Difference Pond Index and Normalized Difference Turbidity Index etc have been used with the help of Landsat Satellite images(TM and OLI-TIRS sensor) from 1991 to 2021 .This study express that amount area of wetland are continuous declining over time and amount areas of built up areas are continuous increased form urban core to fringe area. Water is most precious to all over the world but due to endless demands of people they forget the ethical manners of human beings. This study will throw a new enlighten on the study of urban wetland status.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Changes Face of Landuse on Urban Wetland: Acase Study of Berhampore Municipality, Murshidabad, West Bengal (India)","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-05-27 17:56:44","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1475935/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6a67de43-6ba2-4f52-8f4c-5b1453d8c4a6","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 27th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-05-27T17:56:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-05-27 17:56:44","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1475935","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1475935","identity":"rs-1475935","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0