New Perspectives on Growth and Sustainability. Glimpses into the AI Industrial Revolution

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

We study the concept of _Economic Productivity of Energy_ (EPE), defined as the ratio of GDP produced and energy consumed at country or groups of countries level. We examine its behaviour over time using both historical data and recent, detailed databases. Our study compares the EPE for three different groups: underdeveloped, developing, and advanced countries. The underdeveloped countries exhibit the highest EPE, while an inversion occurs between developing and advanced countries around 2004, driven by a steady growth in EPE of the advanced economies from 1980 to 2018. Notably, during the onset of the first industrial revolution in England and Wales, the EPE decreased dramatically, with the trend reversing only decades later. We argue that, given AI’s current status as an energy-intensive technology, the risk of a collapse in EPE is significant, in analogy with the first industrial revolution. However, AI is projected to generate GDP growth several times greater than the one seen in the first postwar (WW2) decade in Western societies. Additionally, AI’s impact and adoption are expected to be more pronounced in advanced economies. We stress the need to investigate further these crucial questions: whether, when, and how the AI revolution will affect the currently positive global trend in EPE.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0