Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

Researchers identified pyrazole compounds that appeared to inhibit NSP14 ExoN activity but were later found to be false positives due to contaminating cations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This paper studied structure-guided development of fragment-based inhibitors targeting the exonuclease (ExoN) site of SARS-CoV-2 non-structural protein 14 (NSP14), beginning from two XChem-discovered fragments bound to the ExoN active site and then testing newly synthesized analogs and merged compounds in crystallography and biochemical assays. The authors solved multiple high-resolution NSP14–fragment co-crystal structures that confirmed conserved binding poses and key hydrogen bonds, and they found that some resynthesized pyrazole derivatives and 5-alkyl homologs inhibited NSP14 ExoN more effectively, while several initial fragments/merging strategies did not. A major caveat was that resynthesized “putative leads” produced false positives, plausibly due to contaminating divalent cations that potently inhibit NSP14 ExoN, complicating lead identification and optimization. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Point mutations in the exonuclease (ExoN) site of non-structural protein 14 (NSP14) compromise the fitness of betacoronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2, implicating NSP14 ExoN inhibition as an antiviral strategy. However, there are no advanced compounds that inhibit NSP14’s ExoN activity. Building upon the reported crystal structures of two fragments bound to NSP14’s ExoN site, we identified a series of 3,5-disubsituted pyrazoles that bound to and inhibited NSP14 ExoN. However, upon resynthesis, we discovered that these putative leads were false positives, perhaps due to contaminating divalent cations which potently inhibit NSP14 ExoN. Our results provide a cautionary tale to the field about the sensitivity of NSP14 to divalent cations and illustrate the challenges associated with directly targeting the NSP14 ExoN site via fragment merging.
Full text 36,648 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability View ORCID Profile Jesse A. Coker , View ORCID Profile Rong Sun , View ORCID Profile Paul M. Polzer , View ORCID Profile Todd Romigh , View ORCID Profile Christopher M. Goins , Nancy S. Wang , Jae U. Jung , View ORCID Profile Shaun R. Stauffer doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689747 Jesse A. Coker 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH 2 Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jesse A. Coker Rong Sun 3 Department of Microbial Sciences in Health, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH 4 Global Center for Pathogen and Human Health Research, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Rong Sun Paul M. Polzer 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Paul M. Polzer Todd Romigh 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Todd Romigh Christopher M. Goins 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH 2 Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Christopher M. Goins Nancy S. Wang 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jae U. Jung 3 Department of Microbial Sciences in Health, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH 4 Global Center for Pathogen and Human Health Research, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: jungj{at}ccf.org stauffs2{at}ccf.org Shaun R. Stauffer 1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic Research , Cleveland, OH 2 Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Shaun R. Stauffer For correspondence: jungj{at}ccf.org stauffs2{at}ccf.org Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF ABSTRACT Point mutations in the exonuclease (ExoN) site of non-structural protein 14 (NSP14) compromise the fitness of betacoronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2, implicating NSP14 ExoN inhibition as an antiviral strategy. However, there are no advanced compounds that inhibit NSP14’s ExoN activity. Building upon the reported crystal structures of two fragments bound to NSP14’s ExoN site, we identified a series of 3,5-disubsituted pyrazoles that bound to and inhibited NSP14 ExoN. However, upon resynthesis, we discovered that these putative leads were false positives, perhaps due to contaminating divalent cations which potently inhibit NSP14 ExoN. Our results provide a cautionary tale to the field about the sensitivity of NSP14 to divalent cations and illustrate the challenges associated with directly targeting the NSP14 ExoN site via fragment merging. MAIN TEXT Despite the remarkable success of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 remains an endemic threat that kills hundreds of people daily in the US. 1 Viral RNA has been detected in >50% of long COVID patients, and early evidence suggests that antiviral treatments can alleviate these symptoms, 2 - 4 emphasizing the important role of antivirals in the fight against pandemic betacoronaviruses. To date, however, there are only three FDA-approved SARS-CoV-2 antivirals: two targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (molnupiravir and remdesivir), and one targeting the main protease (nirmatrelvir). It is critical to diversify the available SARS-CoV-2 antivirals, especially against novel targets. Non-structural protein 14 (NSP14) is the main 3’ to 5’ proofreading RNA exonuclease (ExoN) of SARS-CoV-2. NSP14 undergoes a profound conformational change upon binding to its obligate co-activator, NSP10, which activates RNA hydrolysis through an evolutionarily conserved protein-protein interaction (PPI) that opens the NSP14 “hand-like” ExoN domain. 5 , 6 ExoN-inactivating point mutants obliterate the replication of SARS-CoV-2, the related betacoronavirus MERS, and mouse hepatitis virus. 7 - 11 The PPI between NSP14:NSP10 has also been experimentally validated as essential for viral replication. 12 Furthermore, NSP14 ExoN activity has been linked to viral immune evasion via impairment of host protein translation. 13 Therefore, with a dual role in viral fitness and immune escape, NSP14 ExoN represents an attractive next-generation antiviral target. However, the compounds targeting NSP14 ExoN are much less advanced than those targeting NSP14’s secondary methyltransferase active site. 14 - 18 Small biochemical screens have revealed that promiscuous compounds such as patulin, aurintricarboxylic acid, ebselen, sofalcone, and bismuth-containing salts can inhibit NSP14 ExoN, but these compounds are unsuitable for further translation. 8 , 19 7 , 20 We decided to leverage structure-guided drug design to identify novel, more drug-like NSP14 ExoN inhibitors. In 2023, Imprachim et al . disclosed a high-throughput XChem crystallographic fragment screen against SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 that identified two fragments ( 1 , PDB: 5SMD; 2 , PDB: 5SKY) bound to the NSP14 ExoN active site ( Figure 1A ). 5 1 and 2 bind adjacently to each other near His268, with the pyrimidine 1 binding on the “left” side of the pocket near the RNA binding groove and the pyrazole 2 binding on the “right” side of the pocket via two hydrogen bonds to Gln108 and the catalytic Asp273 ( Figure 1A ). 2 reaches rightward towards the NSP14:NSP10 PPI interface, where two disordered loops (His95—Gly102; Gly123—Ile150) must rearrange to become ordered upon binding to the co-activating NSP10. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. A . Crystal structures of NSP14 bound to 1 (blue) and 2 (green) (PDB: 5SMD, 5SKY). B . Crystal structures of 3 (orange), 4 (pink), 5 (blue), and 6 (light green) bound to the ExoN active site of NSP14 in the same orientation as 2 (dark green). Polder difference maps (inset; contoured at 3σ) indicate unambiguous ligand electron density (PDB: 9NHA, 9NIO, 9NAZ, 9NFP). Because XChem screening uses “PanDDA” analysis to identify density from even weakly-bound fragments, 21 we sought to validate the binding pose of the XChem hits by bespoke crystallography using a small set of newly synthesized analogs of 2 . Using a crystal soaking system, we solved four additional high-resolution (2.0—2.4 Å) structures of NSP14 bound to pyrazole-amides 3 (PDB: 9NHA), 4 (PDB: 9NIO), 5 (PDB: 9NAZ), and 6 (PDB: 9NFP). We observed identical binding poses, and unambiguous ligand density (confirmed by Polder OMIT maps), 22 for all four fragments. We also validated the presence of two conserved hydrogen bonds to NSP14 (Asp273 and Gln108, Figure 1B ). Neither 1 (pIC 50 = 3.4 ± 0.1, n = 4) nor 2 (pIC 50 < 3.3, n = 5) potently inhibited NSP14 ExoN in a biochemical activity assay, while the isopropyl thiazole 3 (pIC 50 = 5.6 ± 0.2, n = 4), the alkyne thiazole 4 (IC 50 = 3.8 ± 0.2, n = 5), the alkene thiazole 5 (pIC 50 = 3.6 ± 0.3, n = 5), and the cyclopropyl thiazole 6 (pIC 50 = 4.3 ± 0.3, n = 9) were more active. To further enhance potency, we evaluated multiple 1 + 2 mergers inspired by the “ideal” merged compound suggested by the Fragmentstein algorithm ( Figure 2A ). 23 Neither fusion of the pyrazole and pyrimidine rings into a bicyclic 7-deazapurine (such as 7 — 9 ) nor direct substitution of aromatic rings at the 5-position of the pyrazole (such as 10 and 11 ) enhanced activity. However, multiple homologated 5-alkyl pyrazoles ( 12 and 13 ) showed robust and complete ExoN inhibition (pIC 50 = 4.3 ± 0.2, n = 3 and pIC 50 = 4.4 ± 0.2, n = 4, respectively). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. A . Design and testing of 1 + 2 merged compounds. B . Thiazole orange dsRNA intercalation assay. C . RNAse T1 activity assay. D . Crystal structure of 12 (cyan spheres; Polder map inset) bound to NSP14 (PDB: 9NHU), overlaid with 1 (blue sticks) and 2 (green sticks). We confirmed on-target activity as recommended by others for NSP14 inhibitors by demonstrating that 12 and 13 neither bound to substrate dsRNA (by thiazole orange competition assay, Figure 2B ), nor inhibited the unrelated endonuclease RNAse T1 ( Figure 2C ). 24 The unmerged fragments, 3—6 , were also clean in these two counterscreens ( Figure 2B , C ). We confirmed the binding mode of merged 5-alkyl pyrazoles through a crystal structure with 12 (2.3 Å; PDB: 9NHU). 12 ’s 5-cyclopropylamine substituent reaches leftward in the pocket and overlays closely with the pyrimidine N from 1 , while also contributing to a bidentate H-bond with the catalytically essential Asp273 ( Figure 2D ). 6 , 9 Despite a clean counter-screen against RNAse T1, respectable ExoN inhibition activity, and structural validation of 12 ’s merged design, we remained concerned about the possibility of spurious activity due to steep SAR in the right-hand thiazole, especially the surprising low micromolar activity of the isopropyl thiazole 3 ( Figure 1 ). Indeed, the isopropyl thiazole analogs of 12 and 13 ( 15 and 16 ) were inactive (pIC 50 < 3.3, n = 2; Figure 3B ). We were also troubled by the crystal structure of 14 , a 7-azaindazole merged compound that displayed weak ExoN inhibition (pIC 50 = 3.8 ± 0.2, n = 4), which we unexpectedly observed bound to the MTase site of NSP14 (PDB: 9NJG, Figure 3A ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. A . Crystal structure of 14 (red) bound to the MTase site of NSP14 (PDB: 9NJG). B . Inactive analogs closely related to 3. C . Activity of two batches of 3, 6, 12 , and 13 D . Melting curves determined for NSP14 in the presence of DMSO or 1 mM compounds. E . MIIS against NSP14 ExoN. Therefore, we resynthesized larger and more stringently purified batches of 3, 6, 12 , and 13 (Supplementary Information). All second batches were inactive against NSP14 ExoN ( Figure 3C ). This null result was strengthened by our observation that the biochemically active batches of 3, 12 , and 13 displayed evidence of NSP14 destabilization by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), while the biochemically inactive second batch of 3 did not ( Figure 3D ). Recently, Gerstberger et al . reported that metal-ion contaminants were responsible for spurious KRAS “inhibition”, even within a chemical series validated by crystallography. 25 Because NSP14 requires two catalytic Mg 2+ and three structural Zn 2+ ions, we tested Gerstberger et al .’s Metal Ion Interference Set (MIIS) against our biochemical assay. We found that NSP14 ExoN activity is inhibited by most divalent cations ( Figure 3E ). Zn 2+ , Pd 2+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , Cu 2+ , and Mn 2+ potently inhibited NSP14 ExoN activity, with IC 50 ’s equal to or more potent than our 5-substituted pyrazoles (IC 50 0.3 to 16 μM). Therefore, we hypothesize that contaminating divalent cations could explain the spurious biochemical activity of our original compound batches. To our knowledge, this work represents the most substantial effort to advance the NSP14-bound fragments identified by XChem crystallographic fragment screening. We did not identify a merged compound that reproducibly inhibited NSP14 ExoN despite testing a total of eighty analogs. Before launching a hit-to-lead campaign against NSP14, practitioners should stringently remove trace metal contaminants from synthesized compounds, 25 test multiple batches of putative inhibitors, and generate biophysical evidence of binding in solution. Given the promising genetic validation of NSP14 ExoN as an antiviral target, we hope that this work will inspire future efforts to inhibit NSP14 ExoN via an alternative strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Purification and Crystallization of NSP14 Near full-length SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 (Leu5932—Gln6452; UniProt P0DTD1) with a TEV-cleavable, N-terminal His6-ZB tag was obtained as a gift in the pNIC-ZB backbone from Imprachim, Yosaatmadja, and Newman and was purified and crystallized essentially as previously reported. 5 The construct was transformed into Rosetta 2 (DE3) competent cells (Sigma-Aldrich #71397) and expressed in TB-PLUS media supplemented with 0.5 mM ZnCl 2 . 26 Cells were lysed by sonication in Lysis Buffer (Base Buffer + 1X Roche cOmplete™ Protease Inhibitors + 0.1 mg/mL egg-white lysozyme + 1X benzonase) and purified by IMAC on HisPur NiNTA resin (Thermo Fisher). The His6-ZB tag was cleaved during overnight dialysis into Gel Filtration Buffer with TEV protease (1:10 w:w) at 4°C and removed via reverse IMAC on NiNTA resin. Cleaved NSP14 was polished on a Superdex 200 column (GE) into Gel Filtration Buffer and Monodisperse NSP14 was concentrated to 10 mg/mL prior to long-term storage at −80°C. Base Buffer: 50 mM HEPES pH = 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP. Gel Filtration Buffer: 20 mM HEPES pH = 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP. Sitting drop crystallization plates were set at 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 v:v (protein:reservoir) ratios in 150 nL drops by a Mosquito Xtal 3 (SPT Labtech) using a custom screen. Crystals, which typically appeared after 14 days in the 1:1 drops between 0.18—0.22M K 2 HPO 4 and 1.4—1.6M NaH 2 PO4, were soaked with ligands for 2 hours (final concentration 10— 25 mM, 10% DMSO) prior to freezing without additional cryoprotection in LN 2 . Automated diffraction data was collected at Diamond Lightsource Beamline I03 and I04. Structures were indexed and merged using Xia2/DIALS, solved by molecular replacement with Phaser using PDB: 5SKY (with the ligand 1 removed) as a search model, refined with Phenix, and manually rebuilt in Coot where necessary. 27 - 32 Figures were rendered in ChimeraX. 33 Data collection and refinement statistics are provided in the Supplemental Information , and all structures have been deposited to the PDB: 9NAZ, 9NFP, 9NHA, 9NIO, 9NJG, 9NHU. Purification of NSP10 Full-length SARS-CoV-2 NSP10 (Ala4254—Gln4932; UniProt P0DTD1) with a 3C-cleavable, N-terminal GST tag was obtained as a gift in the pNIC-CTH0 backbone from Imprachim, Yosaatmadja, and Newman and purified essentially as previously reported. 5 Construct was expressed in TB-PLUS and lysed as described above. GST-NSP10 was purified over Glutathione® Sepharose (Sigma) in Base Buffer and then the tag was removed with His6-HRV3C protease (1:20 w:w) during overnight dialysis into Gel Filtration Buffer (20 mM HEPES pH = 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP). Cleaved protein was passed over a Talon® column (Takara) to remove the His6-HRV3C and NSP10 was polished on a Superdex 75 (GE) equilibrated in Gel Filtration Buffer. Monodisperse peak was pooled and stored at −80°C at 2-3 mg/mL. RNA Hydrolysis TR-FRET ExoN Activity Assay Two RNA oligos, the 5’ FAM conjugated top strand (5’-FAM-ACUAAUAAUAUCA) and the 3’ BHQ-1 conjugated bottom strand (AAAUAGAUAUUAUUAGU-3’BHQ-1) (IDT) were annealed in annealing buffer (100 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES-NaOH pH 7.5, 0.2 mM MgCl 2 ) at 12 µM by heating to 95 °C for 5 min in aC1000 Touch™ thermal cycler and then cooling to 26 °C. 30 µL reactions in ExoN Assay Buffer (100 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES-NaOH pH = 7.5, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.01% TritonX-100, 1 mM TCEP) were conducted black non-binding 384-well plates (Corning 3575). Compound dilutions, prepared in 100% DMSO, were stamped into each well with an ECHO ® 550 liquid handler and then 20 µL NSP14 (83.3 nM final) was added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. 5 µl of NSP10 (83.3 nM final, 1:1 ratio) was added and incubated at 37 ° C for 20 min. Finally, 5 µL dsRNA substrate 5 µL was added (208.3 nM final) and a kinetic time-course for FAM flouresence was collected on a BioTek Cytation 5 at 37 ° C. Initial rates were extracted by linear regression and then normalized to control wells with DMSO (100% activity) or no NSP10 (0% activity) prior to IC 50 determination by non-linear regression in GraphPad PRISM. Counter-Screening Assays RNAse T1 inhibition assay and thiazole orange RNA intercalation counter-screening assays were conducted essentially as previously reported. 24 The TR-FRET ExoN activity assay dsRNA substrate and Assay Buffer were used for the intercalation assay and mixed with compounds at a final 0.5% DMSO. NSP14 DSF Thermal Shift Assay In technical triplicate, NSP14 (0.15 mg/mL) was prepared in 20 mM HEPES pH = 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 2 mM MgCl 2 and mixed with 1 mM compound or 2% DMSO. Samples were rested for 10 min and then mixed with SYPRO™ Orange (3X concentration, Invitrogen #S6650). Raw melting curves (25-99 °C, 0.05 °C C/sec, 20 uL volume) were collected on a QuantStudio 3 (Applied Biosystems) and each replicate well was individually normalized from 0-100 prior to averaging. Compound Synthesis and Characterization See supplemental information. FUNDING SOURCES None disclosed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by an agreement between the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357, and the Diamond Light Source, the U.K.’s national synchrotron science facility, located at the Harwell Science and Innovation Campus in Oxfordshire, where the work was performed under proposal AU34221. REFERENCES 1. ↵ COVID Data Tracker . https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home (accessed 4/2/2025 ). 2. ↵ Cohen , A. K. ,,, Jaudon , T. W. ,,, Schurman , E. M. ,,, Kava , L. ,,, Vogel , J. M. ,,, Haas-Godsil , J. ,,, Lewis , D. ,,, Crausman , S. ,,, Leslie , K. ,,, Bligh , S. C. ,,, Lizars , G. ,,, Davids , J. D. ,,, Sran , S. ,,, Peluso , M. ,,, McCorkell , L. , Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in established Long COVID: a case series . Commun Med (Lond) 2025 , 4 ( 1 ), 261 . OpenUrl PubMed 3. Al-Aly , Z. , SARS-CoV-2 antivirals and post-COVID-19 condition . Lancet Infect Dis 2025 , 25 ( 1 ), 6 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 4. ↵ Choi , Y. J. ,,, Seo , Y. B. ,,, Seo , J. W. ,,, Lee , J. ,,, Nham , E. ,,, Seong , H. ,,, Yoon , J. G. ,,, Noh , J. Y. ,,, Cheong , H. J. ,,, Kim , W. J. ,,, Kim , E. J. ,,, Song , J. Y. , Effectiveness of Antiviral Therapy on Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis . J Clin Med 2023 , 12 ( 23 ). 5. ↵ Imprachim , N. ,,, Yosaatmadja , Y. ,,, Newman , J. A. , Crystal structures and fragment screening of SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 reveal details of exoribonuclease activation and mRNA capping and provide starting points for antiviral drug development . Nucleic Acids Res 2023 , 51 ( 1 ), 475 – 487 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Liu , C. ,,, Shi , W. ,,, Becker , S. T. ,,, Schatz , D. G. ,,, Liu , B. ,,, Yang , Y. , Structural basis of mismatch recognition by a SARS-CoV-2 proofreading enzyme . Science 2021 , 373 ( 6559 ), 1142 – 1146 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Rona , G. ,,, Zeke , A. ,,, Miwatani-Minter , B. ,,, de Vries , M. ,,, Kaur , R. ,,, Schinlever , A. ,,, Garcia , S. F. ,,, Goldberg , H. V. ,,, Wang , H. ,,, Hinds , T. R. ,,, Bailly , F. ,,, Zheng , N. ,,, Cotelle , P. ,,, Desmaele , D. ,,, Landau , N. R. ,,, Dittmann , M. ,,, Pagano , M. , The NSP14/NSP10 RNA repair complex as a Pan-coronavirus therapeutic target . Cell Death Differ 2022 , 29 ( 2 ), 285 – 292 . OpenUrl PubMed 8. ↵ Baddock , H. T. ,,, Brolih , S. ,,, Yosaatmadja , Y. ,,, Ratnaweera , M. ,,, Bielinski , M. ,,, Swift , L. P. ,,, Cruz-Migoni , A. ,,, Fan , H. ,,, Keown , J. R. ,,, Walker , A. P. ,,, Morris , G. M. ,,, Grimes , J. M. ,,, Fodor , E. ,,, Schofield , C. J. ,,, Gileadi , O. ,,, McHugh , P. J. , Characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 ExoN (nsp14ExoN-nsp10) complex: implications for its role in viral genome stability and inhibitor identification . Nucleic Acids Res 2022 , 50 ( 3 ), 1484 – 1500 . OpenUrl PubMed 9. ↵ Saramago , M. ,,, Barria , C. ,,, Costa , V. G. ,,, Souza , C. S. ,,, Viegas , S. C. ,,, Domingues , S. ,,, Lousa , D. ,,, Soares , C. M. ,,, Arraiano , C. M. ,,, Matos , R. G. , New targets for drug design: importance of nsp14/nsp10 complex formation for the 3’-5’ exoribonucleolytic activity on SARS-CoV-2 . FEBS J 2021 , 288 ( 17 ), 5130 – 5147 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. Ogando , N. S. ,,, Zevenhoven-Dobbe , J. C. ,,, van der Meer , Y. ,,, Bredenbeek , P. J. ,,, Posthuma , C. C. ,,, Snijder , E. J. , The Enzymatic Activity of the nsp14 Exoribonuclease Is Critical for Replication of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 . J Virol 2020 , 94 ( 23 ). 11. ↵ Li , G. ,,, Hilgenfeld , R. ,,, Whitley , R. ,,, De Clercq , E. , Therapeutic strategies for COVID-19: progress and lessons learned . Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023 , 22 ( 6 ), 449 – 475 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Grimes , S. L. ,,, Heaton , B. E. ,,, Anderson , M. L. ,,, Burke , K. ,,, Stevens , L. ,,, Lu , X. ,,, Heaton , N. S. ,,, Denison , M. R. ,,, Anderson-Daniels , J. , The coronavirus nsp14 exoribonuclease interface with the cofactor nsp10 is essential for efficient virus replication and enzymatic activity . J Virol 2025 , 99 ( 2 ), e0170824 . OpenUrl PubMed 13. ↵ Hsu , J. C. ,,, Laurent-Rolle , M. ,,, Pawlak , J. B. ,,, Wilen , C. B. ,,, Cresswell , P. , Translational shutdown and evasion of the innate immune response by SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 protein . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021 , 118 ( 24 ). 14. ↵ Meyer , C. ,,, Garzia , A. ,,, Miller , M. W. ,,, Huggins , D. J. ,,, Myers , R. W. ,,, Hoffmann , H. H. ,,, Ashbrook , A. W. ,,, Jannath , S. Y. ,,, Liverton , N. ,,, Kargman , S. ,,, Zimmerman , M. ,,, Nelson , A. M. ,,, Sharma , V. ,,, Dolgov , E. ,,, Cangialosi , J. ,,, Penalva-Lopez , S. ,,, Alvarez , N. ,,, Chang , C. W. ,,, Oswal , N. ,,, Gonzalez , I. ,,, Rasheed , R. ,,, Goldgirsh , K. ,,, Davis , J. A. ,,, Ramos-Espiritu , L. ,,, Menezes , M. R. ,,, Larson , C. ,,, Nitsche , J. ,,, Ganichkin , O. ,,, Alwaseem , H. ,,, Molina , H. ,,, Steinbacher , S. ,,, Glickman , J. F. ,,, Perlin , D. S. ,,, Rice , C. M. ,,, Meinke , P. T. ,,, Tuschl , T. , Small-molecule inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 RNA cap methyltransferase . Nature 2025 , 637 ( 8048 ), 1178 – 1185 . OpenUrl PubMed 15. Ahmed-Belkacem , R. ,,, Hausdorff , M. ,,, Delpal , A. ,,, Sutto-Ortiz , P. ,,, Colmant , A. M. G. ,,, Touret , F. ,,, Ogando , N. S. ,,, Snijder , E. J. ,,, Canard , B. ,,, Coutard , B. ,,, Vasseur , J. J. ,,, Decroly , E. ,,, Debart , F. , Potent Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 nsp14 N7-Methyltransferase by Sulfonamide-Based Bisubstrate Analogues . J Med Chem 2022 , 65 ( 8 ), 6231 – 6249 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. Otava , T. ,,, Sala , M. ,,, Li , F. ,,, Fanfrlik , J. ,,, Devkota , K. ,,, Perveen , S. ,,, Chau , I. ,,, Pakarian , P. ,,, Hobza , P. ,,, Vedadi , M. ,,, Boura , E. ,,, Nencka , R. , The Structure-Based Design of SARS-CoV-2 nsp14 Methyltransferase Ligands Yields Nanomolar Inhibitors . ACS Infect Dis 2021 , 7 ( 8 ), 2214 – 2220 . OpenUrl PubMed 17. Singh , I. ,,, Li , F. ,,, Fink , E. A. ,,, Chau , I. ,,, Li , A. ,,, Rodriguez-Hernandez , A. ,,, Glenn , I. ,,, Zapatero-Belinchon , F. J. ,,, Rodriguez , M. L. ,,, Devkota , K. ,,, Deng , Z. ,,, White , K. ,,, Wan , X. ,,, Tolmachova , N. A. ,,, Moroz , Y. S. ,,, Kaniskan , H. U. ,,, Ott , M. ,,, Garcia-Sastre , A. ,,, Jin , J. ,,, Fujimori , D. G. ,,, Irwin , J. J. ,,, Vedadi , M. ,,, Shoichet , B. K. , Structure-Based Discovery of Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp14 N7-Methyltransferase . J Med Chem 2023 , 66 ( 12 ), 7785 – 7803 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Stefek , M. ,,, Chalupska , D. ,,, Chalupsky , K. ,,, Zgarbova , M. ,,, Dvorakova , A. ,,, Krafcikova , P. ,,, Li , A. S. M. ,,, Sala , M. ,,, Dejmek , M. ,,, Otava , T. ,,, Chaloupecka , E. ,,, Kozak , J. ,,, Kozic , J. ,,, Vedadi , M. ,,, Weber , J. ,,, Mertlikova-Kaiserova , H. ,,, Nencka , R. , Rational Design of Highly Potent SARS-CoV-2 nsp14 Methyltransferase Inhibitors . ACS Omega 2023 , 8 ( 30 ), 27410 – 27418 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. ↵ Canal , B. ,,, McClure , A. W. ,,, Curran , J. F. ,,, Wu , M. ,,, Ulferts , R. ,,, Weissmann , F. ,,, Zeng , J. ,,, Bertolin , A. P. ,,, Milligan , J. C. ,,, Basu , S. ,,, Drury , L. S. ,,, Deegan , T. D. ,,, Fujisawa , R. ,,, Roberts , E. L. ,,, Basier , C. ,,, Labib , K. ,,, Beale , R. ,,, Howell , M. ,,, Diffley , J. F. X. , Identifying SARS-CoV-2 antiviral compounds by screening for small molecule inhibitors of nsp14/nsp10 exoribonuclease . Biochem J 2021 , 478 ( 13 ), 2445 – 2464 . OpenUrl PubMed 20. ↵ Chen , J. ,,, Zhou , Y. ,,, Wei , X. ,,, Xu , X. ,,, Qin , Z. ,,, Ong , C. P. ,,, Ye , Z. W. ,,, Jin , D. Y. ,,, Boitrel , B. ,,, Yuan , S. ,,, Chan , J. F. ,,, Li , H. ,,, Sun , H. , Development of Pan-Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agents through Allosteric Inhibition of nsp14/nsp10 Complex . ACS Infect Dis 2024 , 10 ( 3 ), 858 – 869 . OpenUrl PubMed 21. ↵ Pearce , N. M. ,,, Krojer , T. ,,, Bradley , A. R. ,,, Collins , P. ,,, Nowak , R. P. ,,, Talon , R. ,,, Marsden , B. D. ,,, Kelm , S. ,,, Shi , J. ,,, Deane , C. M. ,,, von Delft , F. , A multi-crystal method for extracting obscured crystallographic states from conventionally uninterpretable electron density . Nat Commun 2017 , 8 , 15123 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Liebschner , D. ,,, Afonine , P. V. ,,, Moriarty , N. W. ,,, Poon , B. K. ,,, Sobolev , O. V. ,,, Terwilliger , T. C. ,,, Adams , P. D. , Polder maps: improving OMIT maps by excluding bulk solvent . Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2017 , 73 ( Pt 2 ), 148 – 157 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Schuller , M. ,,, Correy , G. J. ,,, Gahbauer , S. ,,, Fearon , D. ,,, Wu , T. ,,, Diaz , R. E. ,,, Young , I. D. ,,, Carvalho Martins , L. ,,, Smith , D. H. ,,, Schulze-Gahmen , U. ,,, Owens , T. W. ,,, Deshpande , I. ,,, Merz , G. E. ,,, Thwin , A. C. ,,, Biel , J. T. ,,, Peters , J. K. ,,, Moritz , M. ,,, Herrera , N. ,,, Kratochvil , H. T. ,,, Consortium , Q. S. B. ,,, Aimon , A. ,,, Bennett , J. M. ,,, Brandao Neto , J. ,,, Cohen , A. E. ,,, Dias , A. ,,, Douangamath , A. ,,, Dunnett , L. ,,, Fedorov , O. ,,, Ferla , M. P. ,,, Fuchs , M. R. ,,, Gorrie-Stone , T. J. ,,, Holton , J. M. ,,, Johnson , M. G. ,,, Krojer , T. ,,, Meigs , G. ,,, Powell , A. J. ,,, Rack , J. G. M. ,,, Rangel , V. L. ,,, Russi , S. ,,, Skyner , R. E. ,,, Smith , C. A. ,,, Soares , A. S. ,,, Wierman , J. L. ,,, Zhu , K. ,,, O’Brien , P. ,,, Jura , N. ,,, Ashworth , A. ,,, Irwin , J. J. ,,, Thompson , M. C. ,,, Gestwicki , J. E. ,,, von Delft , F. ,,, Shoichet , B. K. ,,, Fraser , J. S. ,,, Ahel , I. , Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking . Sci Adv 2021 , 7 ( 16 ). 24. ↵ Scholle , M. D. ,,, Liu , C. ,,, Deval , J. ,,, Gurard-Levin , Z. A. , Label-Free Screening of SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 Exonuclease Activity Using SAMDI Mass Spectrometry . SLAS Discov 2021 , 26 ( 6 ), 766 – 774 . OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Gerstberger , T. ,,, Berger , H. ,,, Buttner , F. H. ,,, Gmachl , M. ,,, Kessler , D. ,,, Koegl , M. ,,, Lucas , S. ,,, Martin , L. J. ,,, Mayer , M. ,,, McConnell , D. B. ,,, Mitzner , S. ,,, Scholz , G. ,,, Treu , M. ,,, Wolkerstorfer , B. ,,, Zahn , S. ,,, Zak , K. M. ,,, Jaeger , P. A. ,,, Ettmayer , P. , Chasing Red Herrings: Palladium Metal Salt Impurities Feigning KRAS Activity in Biochemical Assays . J Med Chem 2024 , 67 ( 14 ), 11701 – 11711 . OpenUrl PubMed 26. ↵ Coker , J. A. ,,, Katis , V. L. ,,, Fairhead , M. ,,, Schwenzer , A. ,,, Clemmensen , S. B. ,,, Frandsen , B. U. ,,, de Jongh , W. A. ,,, Gileadi , O. ,,, Burgess-Brown , N. A. ,,, Marsden , B. D. ,,, Midwood , K. S. ,,, Yue , W. W. , FAS2FURIOUS: Moderate-Throughput Secreted Expression of Difficult Recombinant Proteins in Drosophila S2 Cells . Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022 , 10 , 871933 . OpenUrl PubMed 27. ↵ Emsley , P. ,,, Lohkamp , B. ,,, Scott , W. G. ,,, Cowtan , K. , Features and development of Coot . Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010 , 66 ( Pt 4 ), 486 – 501 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 28. Adams , P. D. ,,, Afonine , P. V. ,,, Bunkoczi , G. ,,, Chen , V. B. ,,, Davis , I. W. ,,, Echols , N. ,,, Headd , J. J. ,,, Hung , L. W. ,,, Kapral , G. J. ,,, Grosse-Kunstleve , R. W. ,,, McCoy , A. J. ,,, Moriarty , N. W. ,,, Oeffner , R. ,,, Read , R. J. ,,, Richardson , D. C. ,,, Richardson , J. S. ,,, Terwilliger , T. C. ,,, Zwart , P. H. , PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution . Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010 , 66 ( Pt 2 ), 213 – 21 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. McCoy , A. J. ,,, Grosse-Kunstleve , R. W. ,,, Adams , P. D. ,,, Winn , M. D. ,,, Storoni , L. C. ,,, Read , R. J. , Phaser crystallographic software . J Appl Crystallogr 2007 , 40 ( Pt 4 ), 658 – 674 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 30. Afonine , P. V. ,,, Grosse-Kunstleve , R. W. ,,, Echols , N. ,,, Headd , J. J. ,,, Moriarty , N. W. ,,, Mustyakimov , M. ,,, Terwilliger , T. C. ,,, Urzhumtsev , A. ,,, Zwart , P. H. ,,, Adams , P. D. , Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine . Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2012 , 68 ( Pt 4 ), 352 – 67 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 31. Potterton , L. ,,, Agirre , J. ,,, Ballard , C. ,,, Cowtan , K. ,,, Dodson , E. ,,, Evans , P. R. ,,, Jenkins , H. T. ,,, Keegan , R. ,,, Krissinel , E. ,,, Stevenson , K. ,,, Lebedev , A. ,,, McNicholas , S. J. ,,, Nicholls , R. A. ,,, Noble , M. ,,, Pannu , N. S. ,,, Roth , C. ,,, Sheldrick , G. ,,, Skubak , P. ,,, Turkenburg , J. ,,, Uski , V. ,,, von Delft , F. ,,, Waterman , D. ,,, Wilson , K. ,,, Winn , M. ,,, Wojdyr , M. , CCP4i2: the new graphical user interface to theCCP4 program suite . Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology 2018 , 74 ( 2 ), 68 – 84 . OpenUrl PubMed 32. ↵ Winter , G. , xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction . Journal of Applied Crystallography 2009 , 43 ( 1 ), 186 – 190 . OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 33. ↵ Pettersen , E. F. ,,, Goddard , T. D. ,,, Huang , C. C. ,,, Meng , E. C. ,,, Couch , G. S. ,,, Croll , T. I. ,,, Morris , J. H. ,,, Ferrin , T. E. , UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers . Protein Sci 2021 , 30 ( 1 ), 70 – 82 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted November 24, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability Jesse A. Coker , Rong Sun , Paul M. Polzer , Todd Romigh , Christopher M. Goins , Nancy S. Wang , Jae U. Jung , Shaun R. Stauffer bioRxiv 2025.11.21.689747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689747 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Fragment-Based Development of NSP14 Exonuclease Inhibitors Confounded by Batch-to-Batch Variability Jesse A. Coker , Rong Sun , Paul M. Polzer , Todd Romigh , Christopher M. Goins , Nancy S. Wang , Jae U. Jung , Shaun R. Stauffer bioRxiv 2025.11.21.689747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689747 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Biochemistry Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7617) Biochemistry (17633) Bioengineering (13856) Bioinformatics (41841) Biophysics (21399) Cancer Biology (18529) Cell Biology (25422) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13352) Ecology (19860) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24281) Genetics (15582) Genomics (22461) Immunology (17700) Microbiology (40295) Molecular Biology (17140) Neuroscience (88413) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2823) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4813) Physiology (7632) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4284) Systems Biology (9808) Zoology (2267)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0