Dual Effects of Dual-Tasking on Instrumental Learning

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

How automatic is reinforcement learning (RL)? Here, using a recent computational framework that separates contributions from working memory versus RL during instrumental learning, we asked if taxing higher executive functions influences a putatively lower-level, procedural RL system. Across three experiments, we found that dual tasking could indeed disrupt RL, even when isolating RL from working memory contributions to behavior. These results speak to methodological considerations in the use of dual tasks during learning, suggesting that such tasks can interfere with multiple learning and memory systems simultaneously. Moreover, our results point to a less constrained conception of RL as a low-level procedural system, supporting a view that tight links exist between executive function and subcortical learning processes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: Public-Domain