Metaeuchromius micralis Léger 2024, comb nov.

article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study describes *Metaeuchromius micralis*, a species with distinct male and female genitalia and forewing patterns, noting significant DNA barcode divergence among island populations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

The paper redescribes the moth species Metaeuchromius micralis (revised as comb nov. from Ommatopteryx micralis) using morphological examination of 33 males, 27 females, and unsexed specimens, complemented by DNA barcoding, with detailed measurements and genitalia illustrations. It finds distinguishing male and female genital characters, including specific features of the valva, vesica, colliculum, ductus bursae, and signum, and reports high DNA barcode divergence across Philippine island populations forming five island-specific clusters (Luzon, Mindanao, Mindoro, Leyte+Samar, Negros), with a maximum reported intraspecific p-distance of 7.3%. The authors note the original type material for the synonym could not be located and state that the species may represent a cryptic species complex requiring additional evidence such as nuclear markers and morphometrics. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Metaeuchromius micralis (Hampson, 1919) comb nov. Figs. 51, 115, 173. Ommatopteryx micralis Hampson, 1919 a: 535. Type locality: Philippines, Luzon, Benguet Prov., Irizan = Euchromius brunnealis syn. nov (Hampson, 1919). Type locality: Philippines, Negros island MATERIAL Material examined: 33 ♂, 27 ♀, 7 unsexed (detailed information in Table S1; https://doi.org/10.5061/ dryad.b8gtht7mh). SIMILAR SPECIES Metaeuchromius fulvusalis Song & Chen, 2002, M. rizali sp. n., M. makintabus sp. n. DIAGNOSIS This species (Fig. 51) is very similar to Metaeuchromius fulvusalis from mainland China. In male genitalia (Fig. 115), the valva spine is less prominent than in M. fulvusalis, and the narrow colliculum of the female genitalia (Fig. 173) is absent in M. fulvusalis. In the Philippines, this species can be separated from M. rizali sp. n. and M. makintabus sp. n. by the subapical zigzag silver line on the forewing. In male genitalia, the short costal process of the valva as well as the vesical devoid of cornuti unambiguously separate this species from other Metaeuchromius species. In female genitalia, the narrow sclerotized colliculum, the short ductus bursae, and the presence of one rounded signum on corpus bursae best separate this species from M. makintabus sp. n. (female of M. rizali sp. n. is not known). DNA barcodes suggest that this species might indeed represent a complex of cryptic species. REDESCRIPTION HABITUS (FIG. 51) Forewing length 4.5-6.5 mm (n = 16); ground color cream suffused with tawny scales. Basal area amber yellow, with one slender shiny silver streak along costal cell vein; three white streaks following lower cell vein and anal veins. Medial line oblique, running inwardly from costa to dorsum, white, shiny silver near costa, marked basally and distally with amber to tawny yellow. Subapical line starting at costal 3/4, zizagging outwardly to vein M1, shiny silver. Apex with subapical white lunule. Termen with five black points surrounded by white. Fringe amber yellow to copper. Hindwing dirty white, with faint patch of marginal brown scales at CuA2. Fringe dirty white, apically copper. MALE GENITALIA (FIG. 115) Uncus ca half of tegumen arm length, slightly bent downwards, apical 1/3 with few setae, apex thorn-shaped. Gnathos projection about 1/5 of uncus length, dorsally covered with tiny teeth, tip pointed. Valva elongate, setose; costal arm projected into a tip pointed upwards inwardly; ventral margin straight, apically curved upwards; apex pointed, with patch of 3-5 long, thick bristles. Juxta elliptical. Saccus rounded. Vesica covered with minute spines. FEMALE GENITALIA (FIG. 173) Papillae anales not coalesced dorsally and ventrally. Posterior apophyses about 7/4 of length of tergite VIII. Anterior apophyses about 9/5 of tergite length. Antrum membranous. Colliculum narrow, tubular, sclerotized. Ductus bursae about as long as corpus bursae, basal half narrow, enlarging towards corpus bursae on distal half. Corpus bursae with opening barely marked; ovoid, with one conspicuous signum. DNA BARCODING An unsuspected high divergence is observed among specimens of Metaeuchromius micralis. The species delimitation analysis recovered five different island-specific clusters for Luzon, Mindanao, Mindoro, Leyte + Samar, and Negros (Fig. 179c). The highest intraspecific p-distance of 7.3% is observed between samples MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL07-D11 from Leyte and MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL10-E11 from Negros. DISTRIBUTION PHILIPPINES: Leyte, Luzon, Mindanao, Mindoro, Negros. Collected at altitudes between 150 and 2300 m. REMARKS The type of “ Euchromius ” brunnealis (Hampson, 1919) could not be located at the NHMUK (D. Lees, personal communication). According to the original description, it matches the characters observed here in Metaeuchromius micralis: The forewing is “red-brown with a cupreous gloss and mixed with some whitish especially before and beyond the inwardly oblique rather ill-defined narrow red-brown medial band” and bears at the apex “an oblique ill-defined whitish band” similar to that of Metaeuchromius micralis, while the band is silver colored, straight in M. makintabus sp. n. or regularly arched in M. rizali sp. n. This species shows a strong divergence in DNA barcodes among island populations. No striking differences were found in male genitalia; however, forewing pattern and size show some island-specific variation. This species might represent a species complex whose investigation requires additional evidence such as nuclear markers and morphometric analyses.
Full text 5,351 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Metaeuchromius micralis Léger 2024, comb nov. Authors/Creators - 1. Museum fuer Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institut fuer Evolutions- und Biodiversitaetsforschung Description Metaeuchromius micralis (Hampson, 1919) comb nov. Figs. 51, 115, 173. Ommatopteryx micralis Hampson, 1919 a: 535. Type locality: Philippines, Luzon, Benguet Prov., Irizan = Euchromius brunnealis syn. nov (Hampson, 1919). Type locality: Philippines, Negros island MATERIAL Material examined: 33 ♂, 27 ♀, 7 unsexed (detailed information in Table S1; https://doi.org/10.5061/ dryad.b8gtht7mh). SIMILAR SPECIES Metaeuchromius fulvusalis Song & Chen, 2002, M. rizali sp. n., M. makintabus sp. n. DIAGNOSIS This species (Fig. 51) is very similar to Metaeuchromius fulvusalis from mainland China. In male genitalia (Fig. 115), the valva spine is less prominent than in M. fulvusalis, and the narrow colliculum of the female genitalia (Fig. 173) is absent in M. fulvusalis. In the Philippines, this species can be separated from M. rizali sp. n. and M. makintabus sp. n. by the subapical zigzag silver line on the forewing. In male genitalia, the short costal process of the valva as well as the vesical devoid of cornuti unambiguously separate this species from other Metaeuchromius species. In female genitalia, the narrow sclerotized colliculum, the short ductus bursae, and the presence of one rounded signum on corpus bursae best separate this species from M. makintabus sp. n. (female of M. rizali sp. n. is not known). DNA barcodes suggest that this species might indeed represent a complex of cryptic species. REDESCRIPTION HABITUS (FIG. 51) Forewing length 4.5-6.5 mm (n = 16); ground color cream suffused with tawny scales. Basal area amber yellow, with one slender shiny silver streak along costal cell vein; three white streaks following lower cell vein and anal veins. Medial line oblique, running inwardly from costa to dorsum, white, shiny silver near costa, marked basally and distally with amber to tawny yellow. Subapical line starting at costal 3/4, zizagging outwardly to vein M1, shiny silver. Apex with subapical white lunule. Termen with five black points surrounded by white. Fringe amber yellow to copper. Hindwing dirty white, with faint patch of marginal brown scales at CuA2. Fringe dirty white, apically copper. MALE GENITALIA (FIG. 115) Uncus ca half of tegumen arm length, slightly bent downwards, apical 1/3 with few setae, apex thorn-shaped. Gnathos projection about 1/5 of uncus length, dorsally covered with tiny teeth, tip pointed. Valva elongate, setose; costal arm projected into a tip pointed upwards inwardly; ventral margin straight, apically curved upwards; apex pointed, with patch of 3-5 long, thick bristles. Juxta elliptical. Saccus rounded. Vesica covered with minute spines. FEMALE GENITALIA (FIG. 173) Papillae anales not coalesced dorsally and ventrally. Posterior apophyses about 7/4 of length of tergite VIII. Anterior apophyses about 9/5 of tergite length. Antrum membranous. Colliculum narrow, tubular, sclerotized. Ductus bursae about as long as corpus bursae, basal half narrow, enlarging towards corpus bursae on distal half. Corpus bursae with opening barely marked; ovoid, with one conspicuous signum. DNA BARCODING An unsuspected high divergence is observed among specimens of Metaeuchromius micralis. The species delimitation analysis recovered five different island-specific clusters for Luzon, Mindanao, Mindoro, Leyte + Samar, and Negros (Fig. 179c). The highest intraspecific p-distance of 7.3% is observed between samples MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL07-D11 from Leyte and MFNLEP-PYRALPHIL10-E11 from Negros. DISTRIBUTION PHILIPPINES: Leyte, Luzon, Mindanao, Mindoro, Negros. Collected at altitudes between 150 and 2300 m. REMARKS The type of “ Euchromius ” brunnealis (Hampson, 1919) could not be located at the NHMUK (D. Lees, personal communication). According to the original description, it matches the characters observed here in Metaeuchromius micralis: The forewing is “red-brown with a cupreous gloss and mixed with some whitish especially before and beyond the inwardly oblique rather ill-defined narrow red-brown medial band” and bears at the apex “an oblique ill-defined whitish band” similar to that of Metaeuchromius micralis, while the band is silver colored, straight in M. makintabus sp. n. or regularly arched in M. rizali sp. n. This species shows a strong divergence in DNA barcodes among island populations. No striking differences were found in male genitalia; however, forewing pattern and size show some island-specific variation. This species might represent a species complex whose investigation requires additional evidence such as nuclear markers and morphometric analyses. Notes Files Files (5.4 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:e05833efdf5cf299506137a5866bafdd | 5.4 kB | Download | System files (26.5 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:56adba5d39a4feeaa2d444babbfa3750 | 26.5 kB | Download | Linked records Additional details Identifiers Biodiversity - Scientific name authorship - Léger - Kingdom - Animalia - Phylum - Arthropoda - Order - Lepidoptera - Family - Crambidae - Genus - Metaeuchromius - Species - micralis - Taxon rank - species - Taxonomic status - comb. nov. - Taxonomic concept label - Metaeuchromius micralis (Hampson, 1919) sec. Léger, 2024

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T04:58:56.175997+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK