A Prospective Dual-Modality Tool for Monitoring Uterine Peristalsis: Integrating Dynamic MRI and Electrohysterography

In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science · 2025 · pp. 125–136 · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05825-6_12 · W4414441670
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11

This study developed and tested a non-invasive method combining dynamic MRI and simultaneous transabdominal electrohysterography to monitor uterine peristalsis, confirming its feasibility in healthy volunteers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This paper studies feasibility of a dual-modality protocol that simultaneously monitors uterine peristalsis using transabdominal electrohysterography (EHG) derived from EMG alongside dynamic echo-planar MRI multi-echo gradient-echo (EPI-MEGE) imaging to capture both electrical activity and uterine anatomy. The authors describe a first-step prospective approach tested for reproducible electrode placement and supported by phantom safety testing showing electrode temperature during EPI-MEGE acquisition remained within acceptable limits; three healthy volunteers underwent combined imaging, with results showing MRI visualization of uterine contractions while bowel gas limited spatial resolution and bladder filling affected uterine positioning over time. The key finding is that synchronized electrical (EHG) and anatomical MRI data enable non-invasive assessment of uterine contractility using this simultaneous tool, with acknowledged constraints from positioning and image quality factors. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,416 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

This paper presents a first step towards a novel approach that combines simultaneous transabdominal electromyography (EMG) with dynamic echo-planar imaging multi-echo gradient-echo (EPI-MEGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring uterine peristaltic motion. Uterine peristalsis (UP) influences crucial processes such as menstruation, sperm transport, and embryo implantation. Current monitoring methods focus only on mechanical or electrical activity, making comparing and extrapolating results between different modalities difficult. The proposed protocol combines dynamic EPI-MEGE MRI and transabdominal EMG to capture the anatomical and electrophysiological features of UP simultaneously. Electrohysterographic (EHG) signals obtained from recorded EMG supported the spatiotemporal information of MRI by integrating the synchronized electrical activity of uterine muscles. Safety testing in a phantom confirmed that the electrode temperature during EPI-MEGE MRI acquisition remained within acceptable limits for human application. Three healthy volunteers underwent EPI-MEGE MRI acquisition with simultaneous transabdominal EMG. Electrode placement strategies proved to be reproducible and anatomically consistent. MRI frames enabled the visualization of the uterus anatomy and contractions, while bowel gas affected the spatial resolution, and the bladder filling influenced the uterus positioning over time. Results showed the feasibility of a non-invasive and simultaneous method for assessing uterine contractility, combining dynamic MRI scans with synchronized EHG. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Allen, P.J., Josephs, O., Turner, R.: A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage 12(2), 230–239 (2000) Ameer, M.A., Fagan, S.E., Sosa-Stanley, J.N., et al.: Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis: uterus. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing (2022). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470297/ Reis, J.E., et al.: Reconstruction of the 12-lead ECG using a novel MR-compatible ECG sensor network. Magn. Reson. Med. 82(5), 1929–1945 (2019) Eytan, O., Halevi, I., Har-Toov, J., Wolman, I., Elad, D., Jaffa, A.J.: Characteristics of uterine peristalsis in spontaneous and induced cycles. Fertil. Steril. 76(2), 337–341 (2001) Garfield, R.E., Maner, W.L.: Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18(3), 289–295 (2007) Hadar, E., Biron-Shental, T., Gavish, O., Raban, O., Yogev, Y.: A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor. J. Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 28(12), 1367–1374 (2015) Harmsen, M.J., et al.: Uterine junctional zone and adenomyosis: comparison of MRI, transvaginal ultrasound and histology. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 62(1), 42–60 (2023) Haskell, M.W., Nielsen, J.F., Noll, D.C.: Off-resonance artifact correction for MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 36(5), e4867 (2023) Hori, M., Hagiwara, A., Goto, M., Wada, A., Aoki, S.: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: its history and renaissance. Invest. Radiol. 56(11), 669–679 (2021) Jossou, T.R., et al.: Electrodes in external electrohysterography: a systematic literature review. Biophys. Rev. 13(3), 405–415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-021-00805-w Kido, A., et al.: Cine MR imaging of uterine peristalsis in patients with endometriosis. Eur. Radiol. 17(7), 1813–1819 (2007) Kuijsters, N.P.M., Methorst, W.G., Kortenhorst, M.S.Q., Rabotti, C., Mischi, M., Schoot, B.C.: Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 35(1), 50–71 (2017) Kunz, G., Noe, M., Herbertz, M., Leyendecker, G.: Uterine peristalsis during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effects of oestrogen, antioestrogen and oxytocin. Hum. Reprod. Update 4(5), 647–654 (1998) National Cancer Institute: Pelvis, female, anatomy (2025) Paramasivam, S., Proietto, A., Puvaneswary, M.: Pelvic anatomy and MRI. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstetrics Gynaecol. 20(1), 3–22 (2006) Rebollo, I., Tallon-Baudry, C.: The sensory and motor components of the cortical hierarchy are coupled to the rhythm of the stomach during rest. J. Neurosci. 42(11), 2205–2220 (2022) Roach, M.K., Andreotti, R.F.: The normal female pelvis. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 60(1), 3–10 (2017) Soares, D.M., Junior, H.W., Bittencourt, L.K., Lopes, F., Oliveira, M.A.P.: The role of cine MR imaging in the assessment of uterine function. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 300(3), 545–553 (2019) Wang, S., et al.: Noninvasive imaging of 4D electrical activation patterns of uterine peristalsis during normal menstrual cycles. NPJ Women’s Health 2(1) (2024) Wong, L.C.Y., Chiu, W.K., Russ, M., Liew, S.: Review of techniques for monitoring the healing fracture of bones for implementation in an internally fixated pelvis. Med. Eng. Phys. 34(2), 140–152 (2012) Acknowledgments The authors thank Cilia and Lena from Brain Products for helping the project meet safety requirements. This work was supported by the High Tech Agenda of the Free State of Bavaria, DFG Heisenberg funding [502024488] and an ERC Starting grant EARTHWORM [101165242]. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Ethics declarations Disclosure of Interests The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2026 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this paper Cite this paper Bustos Vivas, M.C., Tripathy, S., Hutter, J. (2026). A Prospective Dual-Modality Tool for Monitoring Uterine Peristalsis: Integrating Dynamic MRI and Electrohysterography. In: Celebi, M.E., et al. Skin Image Analysis, and Computer-Aided Pelvic Imaging for Female Health. DGM4MICCAI 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 16149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05825-6_12 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05825-6_12 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-032-05824-9 Online ISBN: 978-3-032-05825-6 eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings Computer Science

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (18)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T17:26:54.343160+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK