Gut microbiota composition in preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 1,628 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating gastrointestinal disorder in preterm infants with a high mortality rate. The etiology of NEC appears to be multifaceted; however, gut microbiota dysbiosis likely plays a significant role. This systematic review aimed to describe how the gut microbiota of preterm infants with NEC differs from infants without NEC (PROSPERO: CRD42022344126).

Methods

Databases were searched from inception to 22 June 2022 to identify eligible studies that examined the gut microbiota composition of preterm infants with and without NEC using sequencing methods. Results were described narratively.

Results

Twenty-eight eligible studies were included. Overall, findings were heterogeneous and no single gut microbiota signature was associated with NEC in all studies. Three studies reported no difference in the gut microbiota composition between NEC and healthy infants, while twenty-five studies reported a difference using one or more analytical method (i.e. alpha diversity, beta diversity or differential abundance analysis). Of note, NEC (or development of NEC) was positively associated with increased detection and/or abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (n=11 studies), Clostridium (n=8), and Proteobacteria (n=2).

Conclusion

The taxa most frequently associated with NEC (Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium, and Proteobacteria) may play an important role in the pathogenesis of NEC and should be further explored. - Received: - Version Posted: Funding - National Health and Medical Research Council (Award 1197951) - Principal Award Recipient: Suzanne Garland

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0