When research does not synchronize: Comprehensive analyses show no mother–child physiological coupling

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-16 · read from full text

This preprint studied whether mother–child physiological synchrony in heart rate covariation is detectable and robust across early social interactions, using 102 mother–child dyads (70 preterm 5-year-olds and 32 matched full-term controls) and heart-rate recordings during eight interaction paradigms ranging from passive viewing to face-to-face play. Across multiple commonly used analytic approaches, the authors’ surrogate-data controls, and multiverse analyses, synchrony in real dyads did not exceed synchrony observed in shuffled surrogate data, with virtually identical results in full-term and preterm groups and no reliable prematurity-related variability. The paper explicitly argues that current synchrony estimates are methodologically fragile, while also noting that these findings challenge the view of autonomic synchrony as a ubiquitous feature of caregiver–child interaction. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 14,606 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
When research does not synchronize: Comprehensive analyses show no mother–child physiological coupling | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article When research does not synchronize: Comprehensive analyses show no mother–child physiological coupling Georgios Rousis, Lisa Gistelinck, Ward Deferm, Rowena Van den Broeck, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Biobehavioral synchrony refers to covariation in physiological signals between interacting partners and is widely hypothesized to support co-regulation, bonding, and early socio-emotional development. This assumption is particularly salient for children born preterm, who often experience reduced early physical contact and prolonged neonatal separation, potentially shaping later caregiver–child attunement. Here we present a large-scale, systematic investigation of mother–child physiological synchrony in 102 dyads (70 preterm 5-year-olds and 32 matched full-term controls). Heart rate was recorded across eight interaction paradigms spanning passive viewing to face-to-face play. We applied the major commonly used analytic approaches, combined with rigorous surrogate-data controls and multiverse analyses, to assess the robustness of synchrony estimates. Across all paradigms, metrics, and analytic variants, synchrony in real dyads never exceeded that observed in pair-shuffled or segment-shuffled surrogate data. Patterns were virtually identical in full-term and preterm groups, and no reliable variability in synchrony remained that could be related to indices of prematurity. Together, these findings challenge the view that autonomic synchrony is a robust or ubiquitous feature of early social interaction and reveal substantial methodological fragility in current synchrony research. Our results underscore the need for more rigorous analytical frameworks and raise critical questions about when - and whether - physiological synchrony genuinely emerges in caregiver–child relationships. Biological sciences/Psychology/Human behaviour Biological sciences/Physiology Physiological synchrony Prematurity Mother-child interactions Multiverse analyses Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files Supplementarymaterial.pdf Supplementary material Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8479203","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":569387850,"identity":"4ad114e7-94f9-4d12-9699-47cd1112cc6d","order_by":0,"name":"Georgios Rousis","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4998-3510","institution":"KU Leuven","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Georgios","middleName":"","lastName":"Rousis","suffix":""},{"id":569387851,"identity":"554f3517-2c93-4a93-afdd-b340a4b45fae","order_by":1,"name":"Lisa Gistelinck","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"KU Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lisa","middleName":"","lastName":"Gistelinck","suffix":""},{"id":569387852,"identity":"6ca07f6a-95c7-45f2-8f8c-af0300dceb04","order_by":2,"name":"Ward Deferm","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"KULeuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ward","middleName":"","lastName":"Deferm","suffix":""},{"id":569387853,"identity":"cb18de92-8adc-4864-b6e4-99084d835dc1","order_by":3,"name":"Rowena Van den Broeck","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"KU Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rowena","middleName":"Van den","lastName":"Broeck","suffix":""},{"id":569387854,"identity":"b8300ebf-e51c-4975-9e00-094b6535844c","order_by":4,"name":"Bieke Bollen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UZ Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bieke","middleName":"","lastName":"Bollen","suffix":""},{"id":569387855,"identity":"46828576-9830-4f7c-b435-270fe8f0d781","order_by":5,"name":"Sam Wass","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-3493","institution":"University of East London","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sam","middleName":"","lastName":"Wass","suffix":""},{"id":569387856,"identity":"ff67da83-3a72-4c61-922e-d2eb91d0fe94","order_by":6,"name":"Gunnar Naulaers","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UZ Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gunnar","middleName":"","lastName":"Naulaers","suffix":""},{"id":569387857,"identity":"74c71188-4b71-44b7-a14e-43c240741f65","order_by":7,"name":"Maarten De Vos","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3482-5145","institution":"KU Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maarten","middleName":"","lastName":"De Vos","suffix":""},{"id":569387858,"identity":"daaaf7c0-5683-43af-80f1-9fef6a581ca0","order_by":8,"name":"Bart Boets","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-667X","institution":"KU Leuven","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bart","middleName":"","lastName":"Boets","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-30 08:40:43","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":99795070,"identity":"71782d6a-b03a-4f23-ba6b-ed8ddc493ea6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 13:36:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2249923,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8479203/v1/f0d8e0554e54e0d37b7bdbfb.pdf"},{"id":99655815,"identity":"91861056-e945-424b-a501-27c82cea2ce6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-07 02:10:09","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":9862,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"NCOMMS25104757.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8479203/v1/c0e63d7c7244f890d3624b17.json"},{"id":99795725,"identity":"7e0b53fe-515e-467f-8b03-1e570ee48308","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 13:39:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":652838,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementarymaterial.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8479203/v1/493c7f190ae843859dc080b3.pdf"},{"id":99805005,"identity":"20bee813-f2d6-433f-bc72-abd6282ea51e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 14:15:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1300489,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8479203/v1_covered_6d74a87d-0ac1-46a8-98c1-f6ccd1bc615f.pdf"},{"id":99794287,"identity":"708f01c9-c02d-44a3-91c9-b549053136ae","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 13:34:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":652838,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary material","description":"","filename":"Supplementarymaterial.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8479203/v1/3617db98596ff3ea8c191b49.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"When research does not synchronize: Comprehensive analyses show no mother–child physiological coupling","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Physiological synchrony, Prematurity, Mother-child interactions, Multiverse analyses","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Biobehavioral synchrony refers to covariation in physiological signals between interacting partners and is widely hypothesized to support co-regulation, bonding, and early socio-emotional development. This assumption is particularly salient for children born preterm, who often experience reduced early physical contact and prolonged neonatal separation, potentially shaping later caregiver–child attunement. Here we present a large-scale, systematic investigation of mother–child physiological synchrony in 102 dyads (70 preterm 5-year-olds and 32 matched full-term controls). Heart rate was recorded across eight interaction paradigms spanning passive viewing to face-to-face play. We applied the major commonly used analytic approaches, combined with rigorous surrogate-data controls and multiverse analyses, to assess the robustness of synchrony estimates. Across all paradigms, metrics, and analytic variants, synchrony in real dyads never exceeded that observed in pair-shuffled or segment-shuffled surrogate data. Patterns were virtually identical in full-term and preterm groups, and no reliable variability in synchrony remained that could be related to indices of prematurity. Together, these findings challenge the view that autonomic synchrony is a robust or ubiquitous feature of early social interaction and reveal substantial methodological fragility in current synchrony research. Our results underscore the need for more rigorous analytical frameworks and raise critical questions about when - and whether - physiological synchrony genuinely emerges in caregiver–child relationships.","manuscriptTitle":"When research does not synchronize: Comprehensive analyses show no mother–child physiological coupling","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-07 02:10:04","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8479203/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"af476944-9a9b-4ab2-a8cb-3166c5f9b16e","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 7th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":60582001,"name":"Biological sciences/Psychology/Human behaviour"},{"id":60582002,"name":"Biological sciences/Physiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-07T17:35:19+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-07 02:10:04","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8479203","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8479203","identity":"rs-8479203","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0