Abstract
The present article examines how cultural heritage revitalisation processes unfold in the Czech Republic's border regions. It investigates how these processes mirror power struggles and symbolic conflicts over the past. It employs a "memory nodes" approach, which conceptualises the restored objects—such as chapels, churches, and technical monuments—as dynamic centres of memory that function as physical repositories and symbols of cultural identity. In these border regions, marked by historical ruptures following the expulsion of the German-speaking population after World War II, restoring abandoned heritage sites becomes a critical arena for negotiating collective memory. The study highlights how the renewal of these sites is not merely a matter of physical reconstruction but also a deliberate act of cultural reinterpretation, wherein various stakeholders assert their visions of the past. By situating these revitalisation efforts within the broader context of socio-political and historical transformations, the article demonstrates that restored monuments serve as catalysts for preserving historical authenticity and integrating modern narratives. Ultimately, this dual approach underscores the complexity of heritage restoration as an endeavour that reconfigures the past into a living framework, inviting ongoing debates about identity, power, and the ownership of cultural memory.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.