Evolution of the highest fidelity DNA replication systems

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 1,867 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract DNA mutation on average is deleterious, and evolution generally acts to reduce mutation rates to the limit of natural selection. The limit of natural selection is set by multiple factors, of which effective population size is only one. We consider a form of lethal mutagenesis as an upper bound to mutation rates for any organism, an argument that is congruent with a biophysical context, wherein random mutations are a form of entropy. In this analysis, coding genome size, body mass, generation time, and temperature explain more than 90% of the variation in mutation rate per generation across the Tree of Life. The organisms with larger genomes, longer lifespans and relatively larger body sizes, known and unknown, represent the lineages which have likely evolved novel mechanisms to lower mutation rates. Though these variables are largely shared by Peto’s Paradox, this selective pressure occurs through germline mutation rate evolution rather than the soma. Significance DNA replication is a trait subject to variation and natural selection. DNA mutation on average is deleterious, and is a major contributor to human disease. Lower mutation rates are of general interest to humans, who suffer from age-related diseases such as cancer, and who also now enjoy longer average generation times which generate more random mutations between generations. By identifying the general themes compelling the evolution of DNA replication fidelity, molecular mechanisms to lower human DNA mutation rates may be more efficiently sought. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Author S.B. was involved in concept, design, writing, data assembly, graphical analysis, and review. Author CC was involved in the design, writing, data assembly, graphical analysis, and review. The authors declare no competing interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0