Association of air pollution and green space with endometriosis among women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a cross-sectional study in Anhui, China

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study found that increased exposure to air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO) was associated with higher odds of endometriosis, while green space was protective, and an interaction between green space and CO suggested a mitigating effect.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This cross-sectional study evaluated whether ambient air pollution and residential green space were associated with endometriosis-related infertility among 20,981 women undergoing assisted reproductive technology at a large center in Anhui, China, with 1,201 diagnosed. Using satellite-based spatiotemporal models, the authors quantified exposures to PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2 and green space via NDVI, then estimated adjusted odds ratios with multivariable logistic regression. They found that each interquartile-range increase in several pollutants was associated with higher odds of endometriosis prevalence (e.g., PM2.5 aOR 1.20; NO2 aOR 1.18), while higher NDVI500 m was associated with lower odds (aOR 0.72), and an additive antagonistic interaction was observed between NDVI500 m and CO. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it analyzes how air pollution and green space relate to endometriosis-related infertility in women undergoing ART.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Air pollution has reproductive toxicity, while green space could lessen such harmful consequences. However, the current research on the link between air pollution/green space, and endometriosis remains scarce. Therefore, we investigated the separate and interactive relationships between air pollution, green space and endometriosis-related infertility. We collected data on 20,981 women from a large assisted reproductive center in Anhui, China, of whom 1,201 were diagnosed with endometriosis-related infertility. air pollution (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2) and Green space (quantified using the normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI]) were evaluated using spatiotemporal models developed from satellite data. We employed multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Per interquartile range (IQR) increase in exposure was associated with elevated odds of endometriosis prevalence for PM2.5 (aOR = 1.20, 95%CI:1.11-1.30), PM10 (1.17, 1.08-1.27), SO2 (1.12, 1.02-1.24), NO2 (1.18, 1.08-1.38), and CO (1.12, 1.05-1.19). Conversely, each IQR increase in NDVI500 m showed protective effects (0.72, 0.63-0.83). Notably, an additive antagonistic effect was observed between NDVI500 m and CO. Our findings indicated that air pollution could potentially increase the risk of endometriosis, while green space is its protective factor. Besides, green space might attenuate the negative impact of air pollution on endometriosis.
Full text 2,927 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Air pollution has reproductive toxicity, while green space could lessen such harmful consequences. However, the current research on the link between air pollution/green space, and endometriosis remains scarce. Therefore, we investigated the separate and interactive relationships between air pollution, green space and endometriosis-related infertility. We collected data on 20,981 women from a large assisted reproductive center in Anhui, China, of whom 1,201 were diagnosed with endometriosis-related infertility. air pollution (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2) and Green space (quantified using the normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI]) were evaluated using spatiotemporal models developed from satellite data. We employed multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Per interquartile range (IQR) increase in exposure was associated with elevated odds of endometriosis prevalence for PM2.5 (aOR = 1.20, 95%CI:1.11–1.30), PM10 (1.17, 1.08–1.27), SO2 (1.12, 1.02–1.24), NO2 (1.18, 1.08–1.38), and CO (1.12, 1.05–1.19). Conversely, each IQR increase in NDVI500 m showed protective effects (0.72, 0.63–0.83). Notably, an additive antagonistic effect was observed between NDVI500 m and CO. Our findings indicated that air pollution could potentially increase the risk of endometriosis, while green space is its protective factor. Besides, green space might attenuate the negative impact of air pollution on endometriosis.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants who made this study possible and gratefully acknowledge the role of the staff and volunteers in collecting the data. Acknowledgment for the data support from National Earth System Science Data Center, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China. (http://www.geodata.cn). Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Data availability statement The authors do not have permission to share data. Code was available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. CRediT authorship contribution statement Yongzhen Peng: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Lanlan Fang and Chunyan Wang: Software, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Guosheng Wang: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Data curation. Cong Ma: Visualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xu Zhang and Jianpin Ni: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Yubo Ma, Xuyang Chen, and Guoqi Cai: Validation, Software, Data curation. Faming Pan and Huifen Xiang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Supplementary material Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2025.2504611

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants Air Pollutants

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-24T06:10:11.469335+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-24T06:07:01.243836+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-24T06:27:47.060558+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine