Reactivation-dependent transfer of fear memory between contexts requires M1 muscarinic receptor stimulation in dorsal hippocampus

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,819 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Memory updating is essential for integrating new information into existing representations. However, this process could become maladaptive in conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), when fear memories generalize to neutral contexts. Previously, we have shown that contextual fear memory malleability in rats requires activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the dorsal hippocampus. Here, we investigated the involvement of this mechanism in transfer of contextual fear memories to other contexts using a novel fear memory updating paradigm.

Methods

Following brief re-exposure to a previously fear conditioned context, male rats (n=8-10/group) were placed into a neutral context to evaluate the transfer of fear memory. We also infused the selective M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine into the dorsal hippocampus prior to memory reactivation to try to block this effect.

Results

Results support the hypothesis that fear memory can be updated with novel contextual information, but only if rats are re-exposed to the originally trained context relatively recently prior to the neutral context; evidence for transfer was not seen if the fear memory reactivation was omitted or if it occurred 6h prior to neutral context exposure. The transferred fear persisted for four weeks, and the effect was blocked by M1 antagonism.

Conclusions

These findings strongly suggest that fear transfer requires reactivation and destabilization of the original fear memory. Specific parameters likely dictate similar generalization in disorders like PTSD. The novel preclinical model introduced here, and its implication of muscarinic receptors in this process, should inform therapeutic strategies in this area. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0