Attitudes of Michigan Female College Students About Pharmacists Prescribing Birth Control in a Community Pharmacy.

Unintended pregnancies are recognized as individual, family, and societal concerns. Forty-five percent of pregnancies are unintended in the United States with higher prevalence in those 20–24 years old, with low income, and/or from minority groups [ 1 ]. The cost of unintended pregnancies was estimated to be $11.1 billion dollars per year [ 2 ]. Of the unintended pregnancies, 49% of the mothers give birth, 36% have an elective abortion, and 15% have a miscarriage [ 3 ]. Prior to an abortion, 54% of the women were not using contraception and 29% had wanted to use birth control but experienced barriers to obtaining it [ 4 ]. About 19 million women of childbearing age live in areas without federally funded facilities that prescribe birth control [ 5 ]; however, many of these areas would have a community pharmacy. Other barriers include cost and insurance coverage of contraception, payment of contraception prescribers and family planning clinics, religious beliefs limiting access and prescribing, insufficient education on contraception methods, privacy of use, requirements for a full women’s health screening visit, and health care inequities [ 6 ]. Both the Healthy People 2020 initiatives [ 7 ] and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [ 8 ] have goals and plans to decrease unintended pregnancies. The Healthy People 2020 goal was to increase the proportion of pregnancies intended from 51% to 56% [ 7 ]. The CDC goal is to build capacity for greater access to contraception services, but they do not specifically define the services to accomplish this goal [ 8 ]. Historically the focus for prevention has been on abstinence instead of contraception, even though no evidence exists that these programs increase the age of first sexual intercourse nor decrease number of sexual partners [ 9 , 10 ]. Based on federal funding of contraception through the Title X family planning program, 1.9 million unintended pregnancies were estimated to be averted in 2014 by increasing low cost birth control options and making contraception access easier [ 3 ]. Increased use of birth control and decreased or delayed sexual intercourse were attributed to decreasing unintended pregnancies in adolescents [ 11 ]. Some women (29%) who have had an abortion stated they had desired birth control use but did not because of cost, adverse reaction concerns, lack of knowledge of where to get birth control, lack of transportation, and desire not to see a physician [ 4 ]. After the abortion, 76% of the women wanted to use birth control with 52% preferring contraceptive pills. Many women have stated that the requirement for a prescription for oral contraceptives has proven to be a barrier for its use [ 2 , 12 , 13 ]. Two models have been proposed to help decrease unintended pregnancies by giving women greater access to contraceptives, which are changing birth control to over-the-counter status [ 2 , 12 ] and having pharmacists prescribe birth control [ 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) position on this topic is that hormonal contraception should be available over the counter with no age restrictions [ 2 , 12 ]. ACOG is working at the federal level to obtain a Food Drug Administration reclassification of this medication via legislative change. Some concerns with this model are reduced women’s health screenings, contraceptives unsafe for self-selection, and over-the-counter contraception costs could be prohibitive and/or not covered by insurance plans. As an intermediary step, ACOG has acknowledged and approved the pharmacist prescribing model, which requires state level legislative changes, until over-the-counter contraception status is legally approved [ 12 ]. The pharmacist prescribing model allows pharmacists in community pharmacies to prescribe hormonal contraception for patients. Pharmacists obtain this ability through legislation or collaborative practice agreements with physicians. Eleven states and the District of Columbia have scope of practice or standing order legislative authorities allowing pharmacist to prescribe hormonal contraception [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Another model is through collaborative practice agreements, such as Washington’s authority for prescribing birth control. Recently (March 2020), one large pharmacy chain in Michigan also implemented a collaborative practice agreement for their pharmacists to prescribe birth control to adult women. Additional states have pending legislation. Data have documented adolescents [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], women [ 18 , 20 , 21 ], pharmacists [ 22 ], student pharmacists [ 23 ] and primary health care providers [ 24 ] support of pharmacists prescribing birth control. More information is needed to identify which teens and women will use pharmacists for their birth control access. In California, 90% of pharmacists agreed with community pharmacists prescribing birth control, and 63% stated willingness to add this service to their practice [ 22 ]. Seventy-six percent of reproductive health physicians and 70% of midlevel practitioners supported pharmacists prescribing birth control, higher approvals than behind the counter and over-the-counter birth control access [ 24 ]. Emerging outcomes from pharmacist prescribing birth control are positive. Within two years of implementing pharmacist prescribed birth control for Oregon women receiving Medicaid, an estimated 51 unintended pregnancies were prevented, and about $1.6 million dollars saved [ 17 ]. Public opinions and perceptions are important in advancing pharmacists as birth control prescribers through state legislative processes and approvals. Gaps in identifying characteristics associated with using pharmacist birth control services still exist or need confirmation. The viewpoints of women aged 20–24 are particularly important since they have the highest prevalence of unintended pregnancy in the United States [ 2 ]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine female college students’ opinions about and willingness to use pharmacists for obtaining hormonal contraception in a community pharmacy across a wide range of student characteristics, attitudes, and health service opinions.

Investigators developed a survey that was distributed to a convenience sample. We chose an intersectionality approach by querying about characteristics, attitudes, sexual behaviors, and health services use and opinions ( Figure 1 ) that overlap to influence a woman’s health decision making. The research project was deemed exempt via category 2 criteria (because identity of the students would not be ascertained from the data and no criminal or civil liability or student damage could be determined from results) by two university institutional review boards. An assent information form was included as the first question of the survey. Female college students of any age from any college in any curriculum were eligible to participate. Students selecting intersex as their gender were included but male students were excluded. Surveys needed to have at least one other item besides gender answered to be included. Surveys from students residing or attending college outside of Michigan were excluded. Recruitment was primarily conducted at two universities and two community colleges. These educational institutes were chosen to gather student opinion throughout the whole state and provide metro, urban, and rural geographical variability. One university was in Detroit, one community college in a Detroit suburb, one university on the west side of the state, and one community college in the upper peninsula. A validated survey related to our project was not available. Literature was reviewed related to over-the-counter birth control, emergency contraception, pharmacists prescribing contraception, obstetrics and gynecology practice/provider patient preferences, pharmacy clinical services in community pharmacies, and position statements related to these topics to create our survey. Survey items were developed based on published non-validated survey items or newly created to assess this study’s purposes. A 46-item survey ( Appendix A ) was initially developed with two additional items (i.e., college attending and current city of residence) added after the study started. The survey topics (in survey order) were assent (1 item), health care experience attributes of gynecologists or clinic providers and future pharmacists prescribing birth control (2 items with 9 sub-items each), pharmacy services and evaluation (3 items), pharmacist prescribing birth control advantages and barriers (6 items), demographics (21 items), and sexual and reproductive history (15 items). For the health care experience attributes section, students were presented with two scenarios where she obtained a birth control prescription from a gynecologist or primary care provider and one from a community pharmacist with the ability to prescribe birth control. Students were then asked to rate their perception of nine provider attributes for both scenario providers on a scale of one (lowest) to ten (highest). Students could skip answering any of the items. No personal identification information was collected. A second survey was created for the raffle of two $250 gift certificates. The survey platform was Qualtrics. The survey was distributed to ten students from the two universities for review of item clarity and understanding, and survey completion time. Suggestions were incorporated into the final survey. The Qualtrics survey URL link was used and later the survey QR code was added to advertisements. One university posted an advertisement two times a week in a daily newsletter sent out to every student over a span of six weeks. They also sent a mass email containing the survey link to all college of pharmacy students at this university. At the other university, a study notice or flyer was posted in student news feeds, research recruitment webpage, campus housing, Facebook pages and other social media. Both universities sent emails to female student organizations asking for them to email or post the advertisements. Some in class pharmacy and other program announcements were made. Students were also asked to participate while dining in the university commons area. One community college sent out broadcast emails to the whole student population. The other community college sent advertisement to one curriculum, i.e., nursing, for which a student mass email list existed. Students participated in snowballing techniques by sending emails to their female college friends or posting on their own social media sites. Recruitment occurred from April 2019 to February 2020. Target goal of 1500 completed surveys was not achieved. Descriptive statistics with inferential statistics, Chi square, and ordered logistic regression were used to analyze the data. For Chi square analyses, five-point Likert scales were collapsed to three-point Likert scales. For likelihood of obtaining birth control from a community pharmacist, those stating no birth control use were excluded from crosstab analysis. Extremely and moderately likely responses were collapsed to likely, not sure responses remained, and not very likely and not likely at all responses were collapsed to not likely. These analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For the ordered logistic regression, the full five-point Likert scale and the students not using birth control were included. The pharmacist attributes were on a scale of one being low to ten being high. This analysis was run on 816 of the respondents using listwise deletion. The ologit module in Stata 16.0 was used for this analysis. A p -value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant.

Because of the survey distribution techniques, total sampling cannot be quantitated and therefore a response rate cannot be calculated. The survey was opened by 1110 students with 859 (77.4%) surveys included in the analysis. The reasons for survey deletions were 8 surveys had no responses, 73 were started by male students, 153 had no answers except for gender (1 intersex, 152 women), 11 were completed by female students attending non-Michigan colleges, and 6 were completed by female students living outside of Michigan. The average age and standard deviation of the participants was 23.0 ± 4.9 years (range 17–56 years old). The student participant characteristics and associated likelihood to obtain birth control from a pharmacist are in Table 1 . Overall, female college students stated they would obtain birth control from a pharmacist with most students stating they were extremely likely (46.3%) to do so, followed by 26.3% moderately likely, 12.7% unsure, 8.7% not very likely, and 3.3% not likely at all. The mean response and standard deviation was 2.1 ± 1.3 [six-point scale with one (extremely likely) to six (never)]. Students had positive comments about pharmacists prescribing birth control but also some concerns. Survey advantages and concerns prompted responses (survey items) are listed in Table 2 . The mean number of prompted and other stated advantages was 4.8 ± 1.6 with most students listing five (27.4%) or six (31.7%) advantages. Additional advantages included a Pap or pregnancy test not needed (3), insurance coverage checked (3), birth control switching easier (3), less stress (2), blood pressure checked (1), fewer appointments (1), pharmacists more knowledgeable (1), pharmacists more available for questions (1), easier to get in an emergency (1), easier to get refill (1), and easier to get answers (1). Five students (0.6%) listed no advantages. The mean number of prompted and other stated concerns were 2.1 ± 1.3 with most students listing one (34.3%) or two (24.9%) concerns ( Table 2 ). Additional concerns included no medical chart access (16), pharmacists are overworked (12), relationship with physician needed (10), lack of privacy (8), less education than other providers (7), pharmacists need more birth control education (6), insufficient patient education provided (5), lack of insurance coverage of visit (2), should be pharmacist and doctor team (1), limited birth control options to be prescribed (1), pharmacist not able to resolve side effects (1), pharmacist refusal to dispense (1), non-hormonal options needed (1), less professional environment (1), lack of documentation (1), and uncomfortable with pharmacists prescribing (1). Forty-eight students (5.7%) listed no concerns. In Table 1 , the percent of students stating they were extremely or moderately likely to get their birth control from a pharmacist in a community pharmacy is displayed. Only citizenship, degree program, health professional student status, and type of health professional student had significant differences within the category. Sixty-seven to 77% of the various religious/spirituality groups would obtain birth control from a pharmacist. One third of the students would use birth control even if their religion opposed this medication. One percent stated because their religion did not support birth control, they would not use this medication. For 4.7% of the students, they stated their religion only approved birth control if married, and 1.7% stated permission to use birth control only after marriage and with partner approval. Almost a third of the students (31.1%) had no beliefs that would impact birth control use. Some students (27.7%) had religions that did not oppose birth control use. Sexual practices of the students and likelihood of obtaining birth control from a pharmacist results are presented in Table 3 . Many students (68.8%) were in a sexually active relationship with a man and 3% with a woman. About 14% of the students stated they did not need birth control because they were not sexually active (9.5%), or were incapable of getting pregnant (1.6%), pregnant (0.3%), or postmenopausal (0.3%). Nineteen students (2.2%) practiced abstinence. Prescription or provider administered birth control used by the students were 49% pills, 9.1% IUDs, 3.4% implants, 2.6% shots, 2.1% emergency contraception, and 2.0% rings. Of those using hormonal birth control, most students had only one indication (42.8%), with 41.3% having two indications, and 15.9% having three indications. The most common indication for birth control was contraception (53.6%), followed by menstrual disorders (38.8%), acne (18.5%), and other (3.7%). For the specific sexual practice variables, 69% to 89% of the female college students stated they were extremely or moderately likely to get their birth control from a pharmacist ( Table 3 ). Only sexually active with a man ( p = 0.027) and times of unprotected intercourse in the last year ( p = 0.044) had significant differences within the variable. An ordinal regression on likelihood of obtaining birth control from a pharmacist did not yield a significant model for the variables age, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, or number of times intercourse per week (model significance p = 0.7413). Previous use and quality assessment of pharmacy services and their impact on opinions about obtaining birth control from a pharmacy are depicted in Figure 2 . Having received a vaccination from a pharmacist ( p = 0.01), having greater confidence in pharmacist prescription dispensing ( p = 0.01) and counseling ( p = 0.000), and believing pharmacists have more knowledge than their doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant ( p = 0.000) were associated with greater likelihood of getting their birth control from a pharmacist. Most female college students thought that receiving birth control from their pharmacist would definitely (59.5%) and probably (30.5%) increase their birth control adherence, and would definitely (63.0%) and probably (27.0%) decrease unintended pregnancies. The greater the belief of an impact of pharmacists prescribing birth control on increasing birth control adherence ( p = 0.000) and decreasing unintended pregnancies ( p = 0.000), the greater the likelihood of receiving their birth control from a community pharmacist. Students ranked personal attributes of a pharmacist in the 8.4 to 8.9 (out of 10) range with some aspects of the pharmacy and getting birth control in that environment lower (7.4 to 8.7). The results are shown in Table 4 . Using the nine attributes in Table 4 , an ordered logistic regression analysis was done with the variable female college students’ likelihood of getting their birth control filled at a community pharmacy. The scale for likelihood of getting their birth control filled at a community pharmacy was reversed to aid in the interpretation of the odds ratios. The model was significant in describing pharmacist prescribed birth control ( p < 0.0001). The attributes trustworthiness (OR 1.267, CI 1.130–1.420, p < 0.001), approachability (OR 1.127, CI 1.005–1.265, p = 0.041) and visit expense (OR 0.890, CI 0.824–0.960, p = 0.003) were statistically significant in predicting likelihood of using a pharmacist as a primary provider for contraceptives. The greater the perception of trustworthiness and approachability the students had for the pharmacist, the greater their likelihood to use the pharmacist as a primary provider for birth control. The lower the students perceived the pharmacy visit expense to be, the more likely they would use the pharmacist as a primary provider of birth control.

This study provided evidence that women are interested in pharmacists prescribing birth control. Seventy-three percent of Michigan female college students felt they were likely to obtain their birth control from a community pharmacist. They felt the community pharmacist visit for birth control would be more convenient, save time, and make obtaining birth control easier. They also felt this pharmacy service would help them continue and be more adherent to their birth control, and prevent unintended pregnancies. The predominant concerns the students had were not getting regular Pap smears and screenings and potentially being prescribed the wrong birth control. These advantages and concerns are similar to other studies [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Many women do not know that a Pap smear and breast exam are not required for birth control use [ 2 ]. In terms of targeting this service to select groups of college students, we found across all our student characteristics to have high support for obtaining birth control in a community pharmacy, making the service generalizable across diverse students. Overall, at least 70% of the female college students across the various student characteristics stated they would use pharmacist birth control services, a measurement of acceptability. No statistically significant differences were seen between race and ethnic groups, religion/spirituality groups, residence while going to college, size of city living in during childhood, political party, type of college, student enrollment status, employment, and medical or medication insurance coverage. Students from a foreign country (i.e., student visa or immigrant status) were more likely to use this service than American born and naturalized citizen students, which might be related to lack of a primary care provider, health insurance, and or transportation, or non-prescription access to contraception in their birth country. Healthcare students were more likely than non-healthcare students to use a pharmacist for birth control, which might reflect greater understanding of pharmacist education and training and subsequent medication expertise. Variability within the healthcare students existed with pharmacy students having the highest, medical students in the middle, and nursing students the lowest likelihood. These differences could be related to territoriality and profession-centrism regarding writing prescriptions for patient management [ 25 ]. No differences existed within the various non-healthcare student disciplines, which could mean similar awareness of pharmacist skills and training. Graduate/professional degree students were more likely to use their pharmacist for birth control than undergraduate and associate degree students, which could represent healthcare professional awareness, maturity, and independence in health decisions. We thought more risky sexuality practices might increase willingness to access birth control from a pharmacist, but variability in willingness to use this service did not vary by type of relationship, number of unprotected intercourse events per year, condom use, or worry about getting pregnant. Our study is the first study with a diverse female college participant cohort to assess opinions about pharmacists prescribing birth control, a group which could use this service. We chose this cohort since college students are in the age groups with the highest unintended pregnancy rates [ 1 ]. Another college student study surveyed California student pharmacists and almost all the student pharmacists (96%) wanted to provide this service [ 23 ]. They were not asked if they would use this service. These student pharmacists identified similar advantages as our college students about this pharmacy service. They had more concerns than our students such as the adequacy of pharmacist training, lack of a medical chart with concerns about patient data adequacy, and no incentive for pharmacists providing this service. By knowing more about pharmacy operations, student pharmacists could conceptualize this service differently than non-student pharmacists. Teenagers and young adults also liked the privacy and convenience of the community pharmacist prescribed birth control [ 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. They also had some similar concerns to the college students such as pharmacists’ abilities, minimal patient specific data available, and limited birth control products. Similar to our student cohort, analysis of public commentary to news articles from women and men in Oregon supported pharmacists prescribing birth control, citing the service would be an asset and allow women to make reproductive health decisions [ 26 ]. Within the comments were similar concerns about incorporating this service into pharmacy operations, importance of physician patient relationship, safety issues, and insurance coverage. Unintended pregnancy rates are higher in minority women and those living in poverty [ 2 ]. In our study, many minority women (68–83%) would get birth control from a pharmacist. Also, in our study, 69% of the female college students with a public insurance plan would get their birth control at a pharmacy. How many of these students would use this service is unknown. In Oregon, a state in which Medicaid offers and pays for this service, 10% of women with this insurance benefit chose a pharmacy to obtain their new birth control prescriptions [ 26 ]. In California, Oregon, and New Mexico, pharmacists offered birth control prescribing in rural and urban community pharmacies [ 27 , 28 ], which would align with our female college students in rural, small, and urban residences willing to get birth control from a community pharmacist. Past experiences with pharmacists influenced the female college students’ likelihood of having a pharmacist prescribe birth control to them in a community pharmacy. Using pharmacist birth control services in the future varied based on past pharmacy services used and confidence in pharmacists. Having received a vaccination from a pharmacist and being more confident with pharmacists filling prescriptions and providing counseling were associated with a greater likelihood of obtaining birth control from a community pharmacist. About one third of the students (37.3%) thought pharmacists knew more about birth control than primary care providers, which could be influenced by the high percentage of pharmacy students in the database. Students’ rankings of pharmacist attributes were very positive, at least 8.4 or higher on a 10-point scale. Pharmacy attributes such as privacy, time, and cost were lower but still above 7.4 on a 10-point scale. Pharmacist trustworthiness, approachability, and visit expenses significantly influenced their likelihood of using birth control pharmacists. In the opinion-based studies about pharmacist prescribing, women of all ages would use or support this service, but they do express concerns as well [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Our research adds that prior use of pharmacy services and perceptions of pharmacist attributes influence these opinions. Our study had a few limitations. The results represent one Midwest state and only college student opinions, which might not represent other states or women of different ages. Within all demographics, likelihood to use pharmacist birth control prescribing was high. The chance to win one of two $250 gift cards was most likely not an incentive for survey completion. Since the survey incentive was insignificant, respondent bias could exist with those more positive or opposed more likely to complete the survey. Recruitment was challenging with only 857 completed surveys after mass emailing, social media posts, and face to face recruiting at two major universities and two community colleges. Difficulty recruiting for another public perception of pharmacists prescribing birth control also was noted in a study using social media to recruit women of any age [ 19 ]. Only 2.2% of 44,994 social media advertisements on Facebook were clicked on by viewers, and only 28.9% of those clicks resulted in opening the survey. Although the survey had good diversity with most demographic variables, race and ethnicity diversity were limited with 83% of the students being white and 4.4% being Hispanic. In Michigan, 66% of the undergraduate college students are white, 12.1% black, 5.3% Hispanic, 4.6% Asian, 0.6% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.5% of two or more races [ 29 ]. We attempted targeting minority female college organizations and courses, but these strategies were not successful. Our study represented the group with highest number of unintended pregnancies (60% were 20–24 years old) but other groups such as teenagers (19%) and those 30 years and older (8%) were less represented. The survey was long because we had 4 areas to explore. Survey burden might explain the number of students that opened the survey without answering anything besides their gender or did not finish or skipped certain sections. Our pre-study student sample stated the survey was doable. Some but not all students might have been aware of pharmacists prescribing birth control prior to the study so different degrees of previous opinion development. Many student pharmacists could have learned about this service in class or at national and state pharmacy meetings. Learning about this service might have occurred in other curriculums. Medical students might have discussed the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology preference for over-the-counter birth control, which could have influenced their opinions on pharmacists prescribing contraception. Little is known about the coverage of this new pharmacy service in other healthcare and non-healthcare (e.g., law, women’s studies) student curriculums. At the initiation of this survey, this pharmacy service was not available in Michigan. Now one large pharmacy chain in Michigan is offering this service through a collaborative practice agreement. The pharmacy chain started its service the month after our recruitment ended, which was the month Covid-19 hit Michigan. Prior to Covid-19, minimal marketing had occurred and during Covid-19, pharmacists prescribing birth control was not the focus of pharmacy patient health care, so most likely this new pharmacy provider of birth control had little impact on students’ opinions.

Many female college students in Michigan are receptive to pharmacists prescribing birth control in a community pharmacy. They feel this service will make getting and adhering to birth control easier and decrease their worries about getting pregnant. Their positive attitude results combined with reported prevention of unintended pregnancies and decreased health care costs outcomes in Oregon [ 17 ] support all states offering pharmacists prescribed birth control services. Further research is needed to confirm women’s and societal benefits and use of pharmacists prescribing birth control.