Digital Resilience in Distance Learning among Early Childhood Students in the Play and Games Course at Universitas Terbuka

Digital Resilience in Distance Learning among Early Childhood Students in the Play and Games Course at Universitas Terbuka | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Digital Resilience in Distance Learning among Early Childhood Students in the Play and Games Course at Universitas Terbuka Sri Tatminingsih, Dony Darma Sagita This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 18 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Digital transformation in distance learning requires students to have digital resilience as an adaptive ability to face technical, emotional, and social pressures that arise during online learning. This study aims to explore the structure and dynamics of digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka (UT) students, specifically in the Play and Games course that emphasizes collaborative and creative practices. Using a qualitative interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 students and analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Network Analysis assisted by MAXQDA 2024. The results revealed that students' digital resilience is formed as an adaptive system consisting of three main dimensions: Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, and Digital Social Support that interact with two supporting and inhibiting factors (Adaptive Strategies and Obstacles & Fatigue). Students develop strategies for emotional regulation, digital efficacy, and perseverance to maintain learning motivation amidst network limitations, household burdens, and digital fatigue. Learning engagement acts as a conceptual bridge connecting personal resilience with digital social support through authentic reflection, team collaboration, and task clarity. Peer support, tutoring, and UT's digital infrastructure proved to be external buffers that stabilized the adaptation process and enhanced academic well-being. These findings confirm that digital resilience is not simply an individual's ability to cope, but rather a social-reflective system that fosters academic well-being and professional readiness. Practical implications: Distance learning design should emphasize the integration of digital reflection, adaptive social support, and self-regulation strategies as the foundation for resilient and sustainable learning in the post-digital era. Digital resilience Distance learning Play and Games course Universitas Terbuka Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 INTRODUCTION The acceleration of digital transformation in the higher education sector has fundamentally shifted the learning paradigm from conventional classrooms to a dynamic, adaptive, and globally distributed online ecosystem [ 1 ], [ 2 ]. This transformation not only opens opportunities for expanded learning access and flexibility but also presents new challenges for lecturers and students, particularly in the context of distance learning, which demands a high level of adaptability, independence, and digital well-being [ 3 ]. In the context of distance learning in Indonesia, Universitas Terbuka (UT) serves as a natural laboratory for preparing for and understanding these dynamics. With more than 700,000 students spread across various regions of Indonesia, including inaccessible border areas and far from higher education centers, they must navigate digital learning experiences within diverse and dynamic infrastructure conditions [ 4 ], [ 5 ]. This situation places digital resilience as a key factor in determining students' success in facing pressures and challenges, managing technological adaptation, and maintaining motivation to learn in an online ecosystem that is new to their lives [ 6 ], [ 7 ]. The concept of digital resilience is a new concept that has evolved significantly from merely the technical ability to deal with digital disruption to a multidimensional adaptive capacity encompassing personal, social, emotional, and cognitive aspects [ 8 ]. This digital resilience relates not only to students' ability to use technology but also to their involvement in creating internal reflective mechanisms for reacting, adapting, and growing through stressful digital experiences [ 9 ]. In the online learning ecosystem, students are not only required to master evolving technological platforms but also to develop self-regulation, reflective awareness, and effective digital social support networks [ 7 ], [ 10 ]. Thus, digital resilience becomes the foundation for a balance between academic efficiency and students' psychological well-being in the era of technology-based learning [ 6 ]. Various previous research findings have emphasized the importance of digital resilience in supporting student academic success, but most have focused on individual and conventional dimensions such as digital literacy [ 11 ], [ 12 ] and self-regulation [ 10 ], [ 13 ], [ 14 ]. These findings highlight students' ability to manage emotions and create learning strategies, which are key factors in coping with the ever-increasing pressures of digital academics. However, few studies have linked personal dimensions with social dynamics such as learning engagement [ 10 ] and digital social support [ 15 ], but their research remains very limited. However, online social interactions have been shown to strengthen learning motivation, reduce academic stress, and improve students' digital well-being [ 15 ]–[ 18 ]. Therefore, this study seeks to transcend individualistic approaches by examining the adaptive system of digital resilience formed through simultaneous and holistic personal, social, and academic interactions. The current situation demonstrates a gap in research direction, as seen from the cultural and institutional contexts that are key factors in student digital resilience [ 19 ]. Most previous findings were conducted by universities using campus-based or hybrid learning models with established digital infrastructure [ 20 ], while the context of Universitas Terbuka demonstrates greater and more comprehensive national complexity. Students face unequal internet access, limited direct interaction with lecturers and peers, and experience emotional stress due to academic isolation. These conditions demand digital resilience that is not merely reactive to technological disruptions but also proactive in managing social, emotional, and academic stress. Therefore, understanding digital resilience in educational contexts implementing open learning still needs to be expanded to capture the dynamics of student adaptation more authentically and contextually [ 21 ]. Based on other findings, most studies tend to use a quantitative approach that focuses on the relationships between variables related to digital resilience. Therefore, they are unable to fully explain the dynamic process of how students build, maintain, and reconstruct digital resilience in their teaching and learning process [ 22 ], [ 23 ]. Furthermore, a qualitative approach using thematic network analysis based on MAXQDA software allows for a deeper and more comprehensive exploration of meaning and provides a contextual understanding of how this adaptive system is formed through students' personal and social experiences [ 24 ]. This approach also opens up space for mapping the interactions between the dimensions of personal resilience, learning engagement, and digital social support as a mutually reinforcing adaptive system. Specifically, in the Play and Games course in the UT PGPAUD Study Program, students are faced with a unique context where pedagogical aspects and digital creativity combine. Students are not only required to understand play theory but also to implement these concepts in activity designs that are collaborative, reflective, and adaptive to infrastructure limitations [ 25 ]. This situation makes the course a natural experimental space to observe the formation of digital resilience in action, where personal as self-, social as digital support, and academic as learning engagement dimensions interact simultaneously. Through this context, the research is able to depict a vibrant, dynamic digital resilience system rooted in the authentic experiences of distance learning students. In the global literature, learning engagement is often positioned as a mediator between motivation and academic outcomes, but its role in the digital resilience system of Universitas Terbuka students has not been widely studied. The same holds true for digital social support, which is often discussed in the context of general social media but rarely examined in formal LMS-based systems. Therefore, understanding how learning engagement and digital social support interact with personal resilience is crucial for mapping students' adaptive balance between technological pressures, academic demands, and social needs [ 18 ], [ 26 ]. Based on this review, this study seeks to fill this scientific gap through a holistic exploration of how digital resilience forms and functions in the context of an open university. A qualitative approach based on networked thematic analysis was used to uncover the structure and relationships between themes that shape students' adaptive systems in facing online learning. Theoretically, this study offers a contribution to strengthening the contextual framework of digital resilience, and methodologically, it provides novelty through the application of a qualitative approach based on thematic networks something that has not been widely applied in similar studies. Thus, this study not only highlights students' resilience in the digital space but also how they grow, evolve, and build academic well-being within it.. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Design This study uses an exploratory qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) study design to understand students' subjective experiences in building digital resilience during distance learning (PJJ) at Universitas Terbuka (Open University) [ 27 ]. This exploratory design enabled the researcher to uncover patterns of relationships between themes through reflective thematic analysis assisted by MAXQDA 2024 software, resulting in a conceptual model of digital resilience that is systemic, adaptive, and contextual (Ismail & Kinchin, 2023). This approach aligns with current qualitative research trends that emphasize meaning-making and interdimensional mapping of digital learning phenomena. Participants and Sampling Technique The study participants consisted of 20 students from the Early Childhood Education (PGPAUD) Program at Universitas Terbuka who were or had taken the Play and Games course in the 2024/2025 semester. Participant selection was conducted using a purposive sampling technique that took into account the diversity of students' learning contexts and digital experiences. Inclusion criteria included: (1) actively participating in online and offline tutorials, (2) having experience facing technical and non-technical obstacles during the online learning process, and (3) being willing to provide in-depth reflection on their experiences. Demographic diversity of participants, including gender, study area, and occupational background, was maintained to ensure a comprehensive representation of experiences and strengthen the transferability of the research results. The number of participants was based on the principle of information power, where a sample size is considered sufficient when the data variation has reached thematic saturation [ 28 ]. Empirical saturation was reached at the 18th interview, while two additional interviews were conducted for validation and member checking. This strategy optimally maintained the depth of meaning and consistency of the qualitative data. Data Collection Procedure Data were obtained through in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted online using the Ms. App platform. Teams and Zoom cloud meetings, with a duration of 45–60 minutes per participant [ 29 ]. The interview guide was developed based on the conceptual dimensions of the Digital Resilience Framework, which encompasses personal aspects such as self-regulation, digital self-efficacy, and perseverance; learning aspects such as engagement and reflective practice; and social aspects such as digital social support. Questions were structured openly to allow participants to narrate their experiences reflectively and authentically. All interviews were recorded with participants' permission, transcribed verbatim, and re-verified by them to ensure data validity (member validation). In addition to the interviews, researchers also collected field notes and reflective memos, which were used to enrich the context of interpretation. Supplemental data came from students' digital assignment documents, conversations in the Learning Management System (LMS), and online tutorial notes, which helped confirm and complement the main research findings. Data Analysis Data analysis was conducted using Reflexive Thematic Network Analysis (RNA) with the aid of MAXQDA 2024 software, which allows for systemic exploration and visualization of relationships between themes. This approach was chosen to combine the depth of phenomenological interpretation with the structural rigor of qualitative network-based analysis. The analysis followed the Reflexive Thematic Analysis model [ 30 ], [ 31 ], which consists of five steps: Data familiarization, through repeated reading of interview transcripts and field notes to understand the context and emotional tone of participants. Initial coding (open coding), which involved identifying data segments relevant to the digital resilience phenomenon, resulting in over 180 initial code units. Axial coding, which involved grouping codes into thematic categories that reflected the relationships between dimensions such as Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, Digital Social Support, Obstacles & Fatigue, Adaptive Strategies, and Outcomes. Network coding, where MAXQDA was used to visualize the connectivity between themes, allowing for systematic and dynamic analysis of interdimensional relationship patterns. Thematic interpretation and validation, through critical reflection and collaborative discussions with two digital education experts, ensured alignment between the empirical data and the theoretical framework. The analysis process was conducted iteratively and reflectively, with each stage verifying each other to maintain the integrity of the interpretation and minimize researcher bias. The final result of the analysis was a thematic map of students' digital resilience, depicting the interaction between personal, social, and learning dimensions in the context of distance learning at Universitas Terbuka. Research Ethics The validity and credibility of the research were maintained through the application of Lincoln and Guba's four trustworthiness criteria: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability [ 32 ]. Credibility was strengthened through member checking, peer debriefing, and prolonged engagement over three months, ensuring the representativeness of participants' experiences. Dependability was maintained through detailed documentation of the entire analysis process in the form of an audit trail using MAXQDA's code memo feature. Confirmability was achieved through cross-checking of interpretations by two independent qualitative methodology experts, ensuring the research results were free from researcher bias. Transferability was strengthened by an in-depth description of the learning context, student characteristics, and the distance learning process at Universitas Terbuka, allowing readers to assess the suitability of the results to other contexts. Ethics approval was obtained from the Universitas Terbuka Ethics Committee. All participants were given a thorough explanation of the research objectives, their right to participate, and guaranteed data confidentiality. Their identities were anonymized using anonymizing codes (M01–M20). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION RESULT The result of Qualitative analysis of interviews with 20 Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course yielded a thematic model that maps the structure of Digital Resilience as an adaptive system interconnected across dimensions. Mapping codes and subcodes in MAXQDA yielded three main domains: Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, and Digital Social Support. These dynamically interact with two categories of reinforcers and hinderers: Adaptive Strategies and Obstacles & Fatigue, as well as two main outcomes: Well-being and Learning Outcomes. This thematic map illustrates that digital resilience does not emerge in isolation but is the result of a synergy between intrapersonal skills, collaborative learning engagement, and digital social support, forming an adaptive and resilient distance learning ecosystem. This model was synthesized from all interview respondents and visualized using MAXQDA 2024 to ensure consistent traceability of relationships between themes. The MAXQDA analysis results show a complex relationship between six thematic clusters centered on the concept of Digital Resilience. The Personal Resilience cluster is characterized by emotional regulation strategies, digital efficacy, and perseverance, manifested through sub-codes such as short breathing techniques, adaptive self-reward, and frustration tolerance. This cluster is closely connected to Learning Engagement through reflective nodes such as authentic reflection, peer feedback, and timelines & milestones, demonstrating that collaborative and reflective learning processes strengthen students' self-regulation. On the other hand, Digital Social Support acts as a stable external reinforcement through the support of peers, lecturers, and digital infrastructure such as forums, LMS features, and WhatsApp/Telegram channels, which enable rapid response and social empathy in the face of technical obstacles and digital fatigue. The network visualization positions Learning Engagement as a bridge node, with the highest thematic proximity to Personal Resilience and consistent functional connectivity to Digital Social Support, so that the adaptive flow moves from intrapersonal to social in a structured manner. Furthermore, the Obstacles & Fatigue cluster illustrates the main sources of stress during distance learning, such as unstable connections, Zoom exhaustion, and household burden, which directly impact concentration and learning motivation. However, adaptive strategy nodes such as time-boxing, guided trial and error, and personal improvement plans demonstrate that students develop creative coping mechanisms to maintain academic performance. The strong interconnection between Learning Engagement and Outcome confirms that collaborative and reflective learning engagement results in skill transfer, improved digital literacy, and academic well-being. Thus, this network map demonstrates that UT students' digital resilience is integrative, reflective, and social-adaptive, with each dimension acting as a mutually reinforcing node to maintain balance within the distance learning ecosystem. These findings demonstrate a consistent qualitative causal pattern: stress triggers personal adaptation, adaptation facilitates learning engagement, and purposeful engagement strengthens social support and learning outcomes. To view the data in a partial view, the following figure displays the results of thematic mapping of the Personal Resilience dimensions obtained through qualitative analysis using MAXQDA. This map illustrates the relationships between sub-codes and sub-sub-codes that shape the structure of students' personal resilience in facing the challenges of distance learning at Universitas Terbuka. This dimension focuses on how students manage emotions, build digital confidence, and maintain motivation and persistence during the Play and Games course, which demands creative and collaborative practices. The mapping reveals a high density of intra-dimensional connections, which serve as a stable foundation before adaptive energy flows into the learning and social dimensions. The thematic map in the figure shows that Personal Resilience consists of three main clusters: Perseverance & Grit, Digital Self-Efficacy, and Emotional Regulation, which interact with each other in students' adaptation system to digital stress. The Perseverance & Grit node is directly related to spiritual and cognitive strategies such as spiritual coping, cognitive reappraisal, and the habit of planned digital breaks, which help students maintain perseverance. Meanwhile, Digital Self-Efficacy emerges as the core of personal resilience, strengthened by concrete actions such as guided trial and error, progress feedback, and independent exploration. Meanwhile, Emotional Regulation demonstrates a pattern of emotional adaptation through daily micro-targets, adaptive self-rewards, and frustration tolerance, which encourage students to remain productive even when facing technical disruptions or high workloads. Overall, this map demonstrates that students' personal resilience is built through a balance between intrapersonal strategies (self-regulation) and interpersonal support (feedback and collaborative exploration), which together create psychological resilience to the dynamics of digital learning. Functionally, Digital Self-Efficacy emerges as a lever node, channeling the positive influence of emotional regulation and perseverance into subsequent learning engagement. This figure displays the results of the Learning Engagement dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis using MAXQDA, which illustrates how Universitas Terbuka students' learning engagement is formed in a reflective, collaborative, and structured manner through Play and Games lecture activities. This map visualizes the relationships between subcodes and sub-subcodes that represent learning engagement strategies, ranging from team collaboration, synchronous-asynchronous communication, to authentic reflection and rubric-based assessment. This dimension is an important node in the digital resilience network because it acts as a bridge between personal resilience and digital social support in the distance learning system. The placement of nodes indicates spatial proximity that marks the actual workflow, clear task design triggers authentic reflection, then strengthens effective collaboration. The thematic map in the figure shows that Learning Engagement consists of three main clusters: Collaborative Engagement, Authentic Reflection, and Clarity of Assignments & Rubrics, which reinforce each other in creating meaningful learning engagement. The Collaborative Engagement cluster is characterized by nodes such as cross-group collaboration, team accountability, and conflict resolution, demonstrating the importance of coordination and collective responsibility in virtual teams. Meanwhile, Authentic Reflection demonstrates students' reflective processes through reflective journals, after-action reviews, and peer feedback, which help them understand their learning experiences and connect them to real-world practice. The Clarity of Assignments & Rubrics cluster emphasizes the importance of clear instructions, standardized rubrics, and example artifacts and timelines that serve as explicit guides for students in managing assignments and expectations. Overall, this network emphasizes that learning engagement is not only an academic activity, but also a social and reflective process that fosters self-regulation, a sense of belonging, and adaptive skills in navigating the complexities of digital learning at Universitas Terbuka. The strong link between Clarity and Authentic Reflection indicates that clarity of instructions serves as a precondition for meaningful reflection and improved collaboration. This figure shows the results of the Digital Social Support dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis of interviews with Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization was generated using MAXQDA to illustrate how digital social support functions as an external reinforcement system that supports student resilience in distance learning. This network structure demonstrates the interconnectedness of technical support, emotional support, and academic support integrated within the Universitas Terbuka digital ecosystem, creating a collaborative, responsive, and inclusive learning environment. This support acts as a buffer, stabilizing fluctuations in the learning load when technical barriers arise. The thematic map in the figure shows that Digital Social Support is formed through three main clusters: Peer Support, Tutor/Lecturer Support, and Community Infrastructure. The Peer Support cluster centers on support mechanisms between students through group norms, buddy systems, resource sharing, and emotional support, which strengthen a sense of togetherness and digital empathy. Tutor/Lecturer Support is visible through nodes such as targeted feedback, timely responses, clarification of instructions, and office hours, which indicate that the active presence of lecturers or tutors provides a sense of security and academic certainty for students. Meanwhile, Community Infrastructure includes technological and social elements such as LMS features, WhatsApp/Telegram channels, onboarding guides, and material repositories, which form the foundation of connectivity and resource access in online learning. Overall, this map illustrates that digital social support is not only technical assistance, but also an adaptive network that facilitates social interaction, emotional regulation, and learning collaboration, which together strengthen the digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka students in facing the challenges of distance learning. The thematic closeness between Tutor Support and Clarity of Assignments suggests a double-reinforcing effect: instructional clarification reduces technical anxiety while enhancing reflective readiness. This figure displays the results of the Obstacles & Fatigue dimension mapping obtained from qualitative analysis using MAXQDA of interviews with Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization illustrates the primary sources of digital stress and fatigue faced by students during distance learning. This dimension plays a crucial role in understanding the factors inhibiting digital resilience, particularly in the context of students balancing academic demands, technical conditions, and home environments that do not always support online learning. The findings highlight three dominant sources of stress: the household context, digital infrastructure, and prolonged screen exposure. The thematic map in the figure shows that Obstacles & Fatigue is divided into three main clusters: Environmental Barriers, Technical Obstacles, and Digital Fatigue. The Environmental Barriers cluster encompasses challenges such as minimal family support, double working hours, household burden, and noisy study rooms, indicating that most students struggle to focus on their studies due to distractions and multiple responsibilities at home. The Technical Obstacles cluster highlights the limitations of digital resources through nodes such as limited devices, low data quotas, unstable connections, and file compatibility, which hinder smooth communication and access to learning materials. Meanwhile, Digital Fatigue depicts cognitive fatigue caused by screen overload, excessive multitasking, annoying notifications, and Zoom exhaustion, which reduce concentration and lead to learning boredom. Overall, this figure emphasizes that environmental barriers, technical constraints, and digital fatigue interact to form multidimensional pressures that need to be addressed through social support strategies, digital reflection, and more adaptive learning designs at Universitas Terbuka. Thematic correlations indicate that clarity of instructions and a proportional task rhythm reduce fatigue exposure, especially when balanced by responsive peer support. This figure presents the results of the Outcome dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis conducted using MAXQDA, depicting the final results of the process of developing digital resilience in Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization shows how the interaction between personal, social, and learning aspects contributes to the formation of adaptive outcomes such as academic well-being, increased digital literacy, and the transfer of skills to early childhood education practices. This dimension is evidence that digital resilience not only produces the ability to withstand stress, but also produces positive transformations in student performance, motivation, and creativity. The mapping positions Learning Engagement as the main link that mediates the effects of Personal and Social on learning outcomes. The thematic map in the figure shows that the outcomes of students' digital resilience are divided into three main clusters: Task Performance, Skill Transfer, and Academic Well-being. The Task Performance cluster highlights students' success in maintaining consistency and quality of work through indicators such as timeliness, artifact quality, and reduced revisions, indicating increased academic efficiency and responsibility. The Skill Transfer cluster illustrates students' ability to apply learning outcomes to real-world contexts, such as innovation of game ideas, application in PAUD practice, and increased digital literacy, confirming the practical relevance of the Play and Games course to the professional development of PAUD teacher candidates. Meanwhile, Academic Well-being encompasses positive emotional and social outcomes, such as a sense of belonging, learning satisfaction, and academic efficacy, indicating a balance between academic performance and psychological well-being. Overall, this map illustrates that the outcomes of the digital resilience system go beyond mere technical functionality, but develop into an adaptive, productive, and well-being-oriented learning ecosystem in distance education. The strong link between Skill Transfer and PAUD practice demonstrates the external relevance of the findings, extending the impact from the academic to the professional realm. DISCUSSION Students in this study demonstrated that their success in distance learning relied heavily on self-regulatory mechanisms for managing emotions, digital confidence, and persistence under less-than-ideal conditions. One student stated, "When the network drops in the middle of an assignment, I pause, take a breath, then rethink my steps: I change my upload strategy and keep going" (M09). This statement illustrates that controlling emotional responses and quick reflection are crucial elements of personal resilience. Recent studies have suggested that digital resilience encompasses an individual's ability to adapt their practices in the face of technological change while maintaining the core function of learning [ 33 ], [ 34 ]. These findings confirm that self-regulation acts as an initial trigger for adaptation, which then flows into learning engagement and digital social support as further reinforcement [ 35 ]. Furthermore, students also stated that digital self-efficacy is key: "At first, I was afraid to try new features in the LMS, but after several failures, I finally managed to do it on my own without a tutor. That changed my perspective: I can do it" (M15). This suggests that successful technical problem-solving experiences boost self-confidence, which in turn strengthens resilience to digital uncertainty. The literature suggests that this sense of efficacy is a critical component in building sustainable digital resilience [ 36 ]. Functionally, digital efficacy acts as a "leverage node " that shortens the distance from technical obstacles to effective problem solving action. Perseverance, or grit, also emerged as a substantial theme when one student stated "Even though the connection often drops and I have to rework, I still set a daily goal: finish two slides first, then move on. If I give up, I know I'm behind" (M04). Daily goal-setting and task-solving strategies become part of the intrapersonal capital that enables students not only to persist but to thrive. Thus, the Personal Resilience dimension demonstrates that students actively build self-regulation and task continuity as a foundation for effective digital adaptation [ 37 ], [ 38 ]. Thematic correlations indicate that grit strengthens emotional resilience and stabilizes learning rhythms in situations of uncertain connection. The Learning Engagement dimension emerged as a key bridge in the digital resilience network. Students described active engagement through collaboration, authentic reflection, and task clarity as a bridge between personal effort and social support. As one student stated: "We worked on this game assignment as a team, so I wasn't alone: ​​the group discussions, clear rubrics, and post-presentation reflections made me feel like I was part of something" (M12). This narrative demonstrates that learning engagement goes beyond simply completing tasks, but also fosters a sense of ownership and connection that strengthens adaptive networks. Recent research indicates that online learning engagement is influenced by information literacy and self-efficacy, which in turn are moderated by psychological resilience [ 39 ], [ 40 ]. In other words, learning engagement mediates the influence of personal capacity toward stable academic outcomes. Authentic reflection also emerged explicitly: "After I upload my game idea, I write notes: what worked, what didn't, what I would change. It makes me better prepared for the next assignment" (M05). These types of activities strengthen learning engagement by igniting metacognitive awareness and facilitating transfer to subsequent assignments. Thus, reflection not only improves the quality of assignments but also serves as an integration mechanism within the resilience network. Reflection acts as an internal feedback mechanism, closing the learning cycle from experience to strategy refinement. Clarity of instructions and rubrics also proved crucial: "The assignment rubric is displayed in the LMS, and there are also sample artifacts. So I know where to go without getting confused. It helps me take initiative" (M17). The availability of clear guidelines minimizes initial barriers and allows students to focus on collaborative and creative activities. This reflects findings that learning engagement supported by structured assignment design significantly improves student adaptation to online learning [ 40 ], [ 41 ]. Learning engagement thus serves as a key node connecting self-regulation with digital social support. This placement is consistent with the thematic map, where task clarity fosters reflection, and reflection fosters collaboration [ 33 ], [ 37 ], [ 42 ]. The Digital Social Support dimension demonstrates the ongoing external role within students' adaptive networks. One student stated: "In my friends' WhatsApp group, if I get stuck uploading an image, someone immediately helps me: 'This is my way,' 'Try this.' So I'm not alone" (M01). This quote demonstrates that digital peer support provides a space for quick technical and emotional solutions, creating a sense of belonging that strengthens adaptive networks. Research shows that digital social support is positively correlated with academic well-being and digital resilience [ 18 ], [ 38 ]. Peer support serves as a psychosocial cushion, reducing anxiety and accelerating recovery from technical obstacles [ 43 ]. Furthermore, interaction with tutors or lecturers through digital channels is also important: “I often ask tutors in forums and chat columns, and their responses are very quick, asking me to back up the files first, then ‘. That’s what makes me feel safe and keeps me going with my assignments even when the signal is poor” (M08). Quick responses and scaffolding through official channels increase trust and manage the workload. The tutor’s role contributes to clear instructions and prioritizes actions, thus reducing cognitive load when the connection is unstable. Furthermore, digital community facilities such as the LMS, RBV, MyUT, and other communication channels owned by UT serve as the foundation of social infrastructure: “The LMS has a chat feature, links to recorded webinar tutorials, and even allows me to create a class WhatsApp group. I use all of these well. If the assignment starts to feel overwhelming, I open the recorded webinars, chat with friends, or share my friends’ discussions, and can continue with the assignment well” (M19). This infrastructure and facilities enable interaction, collaboration, and resources that support the collective adaptation of student networks. Thus, Digital Social Support plays an external buffer that stabilizes the adaptation process, especially when technical and environmental pressures arise. The availability of archived materials and synchronous and asynchronous channels facilitates a ‘recovery window’ which is crucial for learning continuity [ 10 ]. The Obstacles & Fatigue dimension describes the multidimensional stress experienced by Universitas Terbuka students during distance learning, particularly in games and play courses. The main obstacles identified include limited infrastructure, demands from the home environment, and digital fatigue, which impacts concentration and motivation to learn. One student stated, "The signal often drops out, especially at night and during heavy rain. Sometimes I have to re-upload several times, which is tiring, and I end up having to start early to get the assignments done smoothly" (M07). This statement demonstrates that technical glitches are not simply technological obstacles but rather a source of chronic stress that can reduce cognitive efficiency and motivation. Recent studies have shown that digital fatigue has a direct negative effect on student engagement and self-regulation in online learning, especially when environmental support is limited [ 41 ]–[ 43 ]. This finding is consistent with the cluster map, where technical obstacles correlate with decreased task rhythm and increased recovery time. In addition to technical issues, home environmental obstacles are a significant factor in reducing learning focus. Several students expressed the need to balance family responsibilities with academic demands, as one participant stated, "If my kids are fussy during online lectures, I have to stop. Sometimes the material just flies by" (M03). This situation highlights that disproportionate domestic burdens lead to fragmented learning time and reduce the effectiveness of online participation. Household contextual factors in distance learning environments can exacerbate digital fatigue by decreasing focus and increasing mental stress. Thus, students' socio-ecological contexts play a crucial role in shaping their digital resilience capacity. Consequently, learning design needs to provide flexible rhythms and easily accessible learning resources [ 23 ], [ 33 ]. Meanwhile, digital fatigue also manifests as a form of persistent psycho-physiological stress. One student stated, "I often feel dizzy from staring at the screen for too long, especially if the assignments are long and the webinar tutorials are long. But if I leave online learning, I'm afraid I'll miss out. So I keep going even though my head is heavy and I'm feeling unwell" (M10). This phenomenon illustrates a state of cognitive exhaustion that builds up due to prolonged digital exposure, which aligns with the concept of Zoom fatigue in global literature [ 44 ]. Digital fatigue triggers decreased learning engagement and intrinsic motivation, and increases the risk of academic burnout in online learning contexts [ 45 ], [ 46 ]. In this context, Universitas Terbuka students not only struggle with technical pressures but also face the psychological burden of excessive digital connectivity. Therefore, reflective and adaptive strategies such as planned digital breaks and time-boxing are urgently needed to maintain a balance between academic performance and mental well-being [ 47 ]. The habit of planned breaks and task pacing are the most frequently reported strategies to break the chain of fatigue. The Outcome dimension represents the final result of the digital resilience process, which has been built through the interaction of personal resilience, learning engagement, and digital social support. Students who demonstrated high adaptive capacity reported significant improvements in three key aspects: academic well-being, task performance, and skill transfer. One student stated, "Now I feel calmer when assignments are difficult because I know how to manage my time and ask for help when needed. My grades are also more stable than last semester" (M02). This narrative illustrates the successful integration of self-regulated learning with digital social support, which has a positive impact on emotional balance and academic achievement [ 48 ], [ 49 ]. Academic well-being significantly improves when students are able to manage digital stress through reflection and active social engagement. Thus, academic well-being emerges as a composite outcome of personal strategies supported by social structures [ 43 ]. Improved task performance is also evident in students' ability to manage time and complete assignments with better quality. One student said, "I used to panic when uploads failed, but now I have a backup plan. I also learn to revise from my friends' feedback" (M14). This demonstrates how feedback literacy and proactive strategies contribute to improved academic performance. Improved learning adaptability and the ability to manage feedback effectively are key indicators of students' growing digital resilience. In this context, students become not only technology users but also reflective learners capable of transforming digital stress into opportunities for self-development. Improved work cycles, from planning to feedback-based revision, reduce the need for re-correction and improve the quality of artifacts [ 12 ], [ 38 ], [ 50 ]. The final aspect, skill transfer, confirms that learning in the Play and Games course has a long-term impact on the professional practice of prospective early childhood education teachers. One student said, "I tried the game idea I created in my assignment yesterday at the early childhood education school where I did my internship, and the children enjoyed it. So it's not just theory, but it can be directly implemented" (M20). This statement demonstrates that digital resilience not only improves learning efficacy but also produces practical skills in real-world work contexts. These findings demonstrate that reflective digital learning enhances skill transfer across contexts through adaptive and collaborative mechanisms. Thus, the outcome of digital resilience is not simply about surviving in the online ecosystem but also about building relevant competencies for professional sustainability [ 51 ], [ 52 ]. The strong link between assignment products and field practice underscores the external relevance of learning for performance in Early Childhood Education (ECE). Overall, all of the above dimensions collectively illustrate that digital resilience in distance learning students is systemic and dynamic, not simply an individual's resilience to technical disruptions, but an active integration of self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social networks. For each student, the adaptation pathway follows a pattern where obstacles (technical/environmental) trigger self-regulation (Personal Resilience), which is strengthened through learning engagement, and then supported through digital social networks (Digital Social Support), resulting in positive outcomes such as task performance and academic well-being. Universitas Terbuka students are able to transform technical obstacles, environmental stress, and digital fatigue into reflective and adaptive momentum through social support and collaborative learning strategies. When digital resilience develops, the end result is not only improved academic performance but also the development of psychological well-being and professional readiness [ 7 ]. Thus, distance learning at Universitas Terbuka can be viewed as an adaptive ecosystem that combines emotional, social, and cognitive aspects to shape resilient and reflective students in the digital age. Overall, the results of this research synthesis indicate that the digital resilience process of Universitas Terbuka students operates as a structured adaptive system. The MAXQDA network map displays a consistent sequential pattern, where initial stressors, including technical, environmental, and psychological factors, trigger the activation of personal adaptation strategies, which then develop into reflective engagement through collaboration, task clarity, and metacognitive practices. This reflective engagement is reinforced by digital social support from peers, tutors, and the learning infrastructure, ultimately resulting in academic outcomes such as well-being, more stable task performance, and the transfer of skills to professional practice. This process demonstrates that digital resilience is not a single response, but rather a multi-layered mechanism that reinforces emotional, cognitive, social, and pedagogical aspects in the context of distance learning. Therefore, distance learning at Universitas Terbuka creates an adaptive ecosystem that enables students to transform digital stressors into opportunities for academic and professional growth. Digital resilience emerges not simply as a coping skill, but as a reflective and collaborative competency that fosters academic well-being, learning independence, and work readiness. Thus, student success in distance learning is determined not only by technology, but also by their ability to integrate self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social support as the foundation for resilient and sustainable learning in the post-digital era. CONCLUSION The results of this study confirm that the digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka students in distance learning is a multi-layered, mutually reinforcing adaptive system. The adaptation process begins with digital pressures, whether technical, environmental, or psychological, which are then responded to through self-regulation mechanisms, strengthening digital efficacy, and perseverance in managing tasks. This personal adaptation develops into a more reflective and collaborative learning engagement, characterized by clear instructions, authentic reflective practices, and synergistic team interactions. Meanwhile, digital social support from peers, tutors, and the learning infrastructure serves as a stabilizing force, maintaining learning continuity when pressure increases. The integration of these three dimensions forms a consistent pattern of adaptation, where each component acts as a node that flows reinforcement towards improved learning outcomes emotionally, academically, and professionally. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that digital resilience is not just a coping skill, but rather a social-reflective capacity that enables students to build academic well-being, improve task performance, and transfer skills to professional practice, including in the Early Childhood Education (ECE) context, which is the primary focus of the Play and Games course. By viewing digital resilience as a system, rather than a single variable, this study emphasizes that the success of distance learning relies heavily on a balance between self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social support. These findings provide important implications: distance learning design needs to integrate self-regulation strategies, digital reflection spaces, adaptive social support, and clear, experience-oriented task structures. In this way, Universitas Terbuka can continue to develop a resilient, inclusive, and sustainable learning ecosystem, preparing students to become independent learners and professionals ready to face the challenges of the post-digital era. Declarations Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), under the auspices of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. This research was conducted within the framework of the EQUITY Program. The authors extend their sincere appreciation for the support that made this study possible. Author contributions Sri tatminingsih (1st Author and Corresponding Author) -Conceptualized the review, designed the methodology, conducted the literature search and data extraction, performed initial data analysis and interpretation, drafted the manuscript. Dony Darma Sagita (2nd) - Assisted with designing the methodology, conducted literature search and data validation, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, revised the manuscript for critical intellectual content, reviewed and approved the final manuscript. Funding This paper is funded by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) on behalf of the Indonesian Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology and managed under the EQUITY Program Data availability The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Ethical approval This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Universitas Terbuka. The research protocol was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with relevant national research guidelines. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent to participate Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the voluntary nature of participation, their right to withdraw at any time, and the confidentiality of their responses. Declaration of Generative AI Use During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Chat GPT in order as a tools were used to assist in the structuring, clarity of language, and coherence of arguments in this paper . After using this tool/service, the author reviewed and edited the content as necessary and took full responsibility for the content of the publication. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study discussed in this correspondence was conducted independently and without any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the work. The views expressed in this letter are solely those of the authors and are not influenced by any external parties or institutions. Consent for publication Participants provided consent for anonymized quotations from interviews to be used in academic publications. Clinical trial number Not applicable. References Benavides LMC, Tamayo Arias JA, Arango Serna MD, Branch JW, Bedoya, Burgos D. Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3291. Gkrimpizi T, Peristeras V, Magnisalis I. Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Educ Sci. 2023;13(7):746. Leal Filho W et al. Digital transformation and sustainable development in higher education in a post-pandemic world,., 2024. Darojat O, Idrus O, Ardıasıh LS. Disruptive change and learning innovations: Challenges and opportunities for Universitas Terbuka. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2023;24(3):60–70. Yunus M, Yuliana E. The challenges of open and distance learning in managing practicums/practical courses during the Covid-19 pandemic: Universitas Terbuka case study. ASEAN J Open Distance Learn. 2020;12(2):48–59. Sun H, Yuan C, Qian Q, He S, Luo Q. Digital resilience among individuals in school education settings: a concept analysis based on a scoping review. Front psychiatry. 2022;13:858515. Solekhah DZ, Sakdiyah F, Silvia F. Digital Mindset And Student Resilience: A Post-Pandemic Study On Learning Motivation In Indonesian High Schools. Educ J Sos Hum dan Pendidik. 2025;5(2):27–38. Öztürk F, Çalışkan B, Oğuz-Duran N. Digital Resilience. Eur Psychol, 2025. Yasir M, Ullah A, Siddique M, Hamid Z, Khan N. The capabilities, challenges, and resilience of digital learning as a tool for education during the COVID-19, 2022. Ge D. Resilience and online learning emotional engagement among college students in the digital age: a perspective based on self-regulated learning theory. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):326. Bylieva D, Hong J-C, Lobatyuk V, Nam T. Self-regulation in e-learning environment. Educ Sci. 2021;11(12):785. Chen F. The relationship between digital literacy and college students’ academic achievement: the chain mediating role of learning adaptation and online self-regulated learning. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1590649. Ang WHD, et al. Resilience for undergraduate students: development and evaluation of a theory-driven, evidence-based and learner centered digital resilience skills enhancement (RISE) program. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12729. Zhao Z, Ma Y, Zhu H, Zhang Y, Obaid A. The relationships among self-control, psychological resilience, and digital addiction in college students: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1650148. Qi C, Yang N. Digital resilience and technological stress in adolescents: A mixed-methods study of factors and interventions. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(14):19067–113. Wang X, Wang Y. The impact of perceived social support on e-learning engagement among college students: serial mediation of growth mindset and subjective well-being. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2024;39(4):4163–80. Wang S, Wang Y, Zhao L. Effects of psychological resilience on online learning performance and satisfaction among undergraduates: The mediating role of academic burnout. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2025;34(1):395–409. Sun Y, Liu L. Structural equation modeling of university students’ academic resilience academic well-being, personality and educational attainment in online classes with Tencent Meeting application in China: Investigating the role of student engagement. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):347. Dhovier I, Maryam EW. Resiliensi Mahasiswa yang Bekerja. J Islam Psychol. 2024;1(1):10. Hariadi B, Sunarto MJ, Sudarmaningtyas P. Hybrid learning by using brilian applications as one of the learning alternatives to improve learning outcomes in college. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(10):34–45. Ardi Z, Putra AH, Mulia FD. Resiliensi Akademik: Fondasi Sukses Pendidikan. CV Eureka Media Aksara; 2024. Stenalt MH. Digital student agency: Approaching agency in digital contexts from a critical perspective. Front Learn Res. 2021;9(3):52–68. Gregersen EM, Astrupgaard SL, Jespersen MH, Gårdhus TP, Albris K. Digital dependence: Online fatigue and coping strategies during the COVID-19 lockdown. Media Cult Soc. 2023;45(5):967–84. Rizzo A, Aquilina R, Falzon R. Applying MAXQDA in a Grounded Theory Study: Evaluation, Computer Supported Qualitative Research: New Trends in Qualitative Research (WCQR2024) , vol. 1061. p. 175, 2024. Fadlillah M. Buku ajar bermain & permainan anak usia dini. Prenada Media; 2019. Elattar NF, Zaki HN, Barakat MM. Effect of Online Learning on Psychological Wellbeing, Academic Resilience, and self-efficacy of students during COVID-19 pandemic. Zagazig Nurs J. 2024;20(1):314–31. Oxley L. An examination of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Educ Child Psychol, 33, 3, 2016. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60. Mahat-Shamir M, Neimeyer RA, Pitcho-Prelorentzos S. Designing in-depth semi-structured interviews for revealing meaning reconstruction after loss. Death Stud. 2021;45(2):83–90. Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–52. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa . Ahmed SK. The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. J Med Surg Public Heal. 2024;2:100051. Ye F, et al. Impact of digital technology usage on firm resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2024;29(1):162–75. Soetekouw L, Angelopoulos S. Digital resilience through training protocols: Learning to identify fake news on social media. Inf Syst Front. 2024;26(2):459–75. Qi R, Ma G, Liu C, Zhang Q, Wang Q. Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain resilience. Financ Res Lett. 2024;66:105564. Eastin MS, LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J Comput Commun. 2000;6(1):JCMC611. Stoffel JM, Cain J. Review of grit and resilience literature within health professions education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):6150. Wang L. The role of students’ self-regulated learning, grit, and resilience in second language learning. Front Psychol. 2021;12:800488. Yang Y-D, Zhou C-L, Wang Z-Q. The relationship between self-control and learning engagement among Chinese college students: the chain mediating roles of resilience and positive emotions. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1331691. Shao Y, Kang S. The association between peer relationship and learning engagement among adolescents: The chain mediating roles of self-efficacy and academic resilience. Front Psychol. 2022;13:938756. Ismail N, Kinchin G. Construct of phenomenological analysis: case study of interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA). Egypt Sch J. 2023;2(1):7–17. Marotta A, Centofanti C, Di Sciullo G, Antonelli C, Graziosi F, Valcarenghi L. A Resilient Passive Optical Network Architecture Based on Dynamic Spatial Aggregation, in 2025 25th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) , 2025, pp. 1–4. Sagita DD, Amsal MF. Integrating acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) into adolescent health interventions: addressing the links between sleep, obesity, and mental health., Journal of affective disorders , vol. 393, no. Pt B. Netherlands, p. 120472, Jan. 2026. 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120472 Nesher Shoshan H, Wehrt W. Understanding ‘Zoom fatigue’: A mixed-method approach. Appl Psychol. 2022;71(3):827–52. Lin S-H, Huang Y-C. Life stress and academic burnout. Act Learn High Educ. 2014;15(1):77–90. Liu Z, Xie Y, Sun Z, Liu D, Yin H, Shi L. Factors associated with academic burnout and its prevalence among university students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):317. Simarmata SW, Batubara A, Sagita DD, Violina EI, Syaikhu A, Simangunsong J. Rational emotive behavior therapy for preventing smoking initiation among school children: Addressing peer influence and social susceptibility., Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences , vol. 20, no. 5. Saudi Arabia, pp. 726–727, Oct. 2025. 10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.09.008 Anthonysamy L, Ah K, Choo, Soon Hin H. Investigating Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Digital Learning relevancy. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2021;18(1):29–64. Yen M, Chen S, Wang C, Chen H, Hsu Y, Liu T. A framework for self-regulated digital learning (SRDL). J Comput Assist Learn. 2018;34(5):580–9. Chen F, et al. Multi-ancestry transcriptome-wide association analyses yield insights into tobacco use biology and drug repurposing. Nat Genet. 2023;55(2):291–300. Weng C, Puspitasari D, Rathinasabapathi A, Kuo A. Reflective learning as an important key to the success of an online course. Behav Inf Technol. 2022;41(15):3382–98. Colomer J, Serra T, Cañabate D, Bubnys R. Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3827. MDPI. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 10 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 05 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 02 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 02 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 28 Feb, 2026 Reviews received at journal 27 Feb, 2026 Reviews received at journal 25 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 25 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 22 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 21 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 20 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 20 Feb, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 20 Feb, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 19 Feb, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 19 Feb, 2026 First submitted to journal 19 Feb, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8725057","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":595289543,"identity":"d0e00de0-ba78-4b60-a3f7-e08a03dde111","order_by":0,"name":"Sri Tatminingsih","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indonesia Open University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sri","middleName":"","lastName":"Tatminingsih","suffix":""},{"id":595289544,"identity":"3e259e11-0445-43eb-a947-6ef314ffcd9a","order_by":1,"name":"Dony Darma Sagita","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indonesia Open University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dony","middleName":"Darma","lastName":"Sagita","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-28 20:53:11","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103431245,"identity":"81291e54-7306-42d4-99c7-29dc8f1a0288","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:19","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":356100,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThematic Network Map of Students' Digital Resilience in Distance Learning in the Play and Games Course\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/041e4bbc46fdce821dcfbc6a.png"},{"id":103431242,"identity":"84dc4af9-a00c-4d89-b082-748337c0778b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:18","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":155039,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNetwork Map of the Personal Resilience Dimensions of Students in Distance Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/d0ad3ca4105522a30a9bb611.png"},{"id":103431243,"identity":"585e0b75-bd95-472a-b829-3fe1467f3873","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:19","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":178885,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNetwork Map of Student Learning Engagement Dimensions in Distance Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/5d9c717aa21d8888bdf145dd.png"},{"id":103431247,"identity":"f885e81d-fed8-4460-8b6f-5d0e91c07431","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:19","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":149553,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNetwork Map of the Digital Dimension of Social Support for Students in \u0026nbsp;Distance Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/48d74d9d13e710e213ac116f.png"},{"id":103431246,"identity":"1fc6f720-6620-4974-b81e-d33a8394ba8c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:19","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":226653,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNetwork Map of Obstacles and Fatigue Dimensions of Students in Distance Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/f06fe0e8a4041e0f1a6a6b62.png"},{"id":103431244,"identity":"0e5ab0be-d2ee-469e-9190-9f5ec9f57fb7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-25 15:30:19","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":165694,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNetwork Map of the Dimensions of Students' Digital Resilience Outcomes in Distance Learning\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/846dd14ae9ce91342dd0c0a6.png"},{"id":103507291,"identity":"37a25b17-3900-4014-beb8-a076f51f3b55","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-26 13:40:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1729705,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8725057/v1/c51a05d4-30c4-4342-8f22-74dd26c71852.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Digital Resilience in Distance Learning among Early Childhood Students in the Play and Games Course at Universitas Terbuka","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe acceleration of digital transformation in the higher education sector has fundamentally shifted the learning paradigm from conventional classrooms to a dynamic, adaptive, and globally distributed online ecosystem [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. This transformation not only opens opportunities for expanded learning access and flexibility but also presents new challenges for lecturers and students, particularly in the context of distance learning, which demands a high level of adaptability, independence, and digital well-being [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. In the context of distance learning in Indonesia, Universitas Terbuka (UT) serves as a natural laboratory for preparing for and understanding these dynamics. With more than 700,000 students spread across various regions of Indonesia, including inaccessible border areas and far from higher education centers, they must navigate digital learning experiences within diverse and dynamic infrastructure conditions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. This situation places digital resilience as a key factor in determining students' success in facing pressures and challenges, managing technological adaptation, and maintaining motivation to learn in an online ecosystem that is new to their lives [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe concept of digital resilience is a new concept that has evolved significantly from merely the technical ability to deal with digital disruption to a multidimensional adaptive capacity encompassing personal, social, emotional, and cognitive aspects [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. This digital resilience relates not only to students' ability to use technology but also to their involvement in creating internal reflective mechanisms for reacting, adapting, and growing through stressful digital experiences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. In the online learning ecosystem, students are not only required to master evolving technological platforms but also to develop self-regulation, reflective awareness, and effective digital social support networks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, digital resilience becomes the foundation for a balance between academic efficiency and students' psychological well-being in the era of technology-based learning [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eVarious previous research findings have emphasized the importance of digital resilience in supporting student academic success, but most have focused on individual and conventional dimensions such as digital literacy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e] and self-regulation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. These findings highlight students' ability to manage emotions and create learning strategies, which are key factors in coping with the ever-increasing pressures of digital academics. However, few studies have linked personal dimensions with social dynamics such as learning engagement [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e] and digital social support [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e], but their research remains very limited. However, online social interactions have been shown to strengthen learning motivation, reduce academic stress, and improve students' digital well-being [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR16 CR17\" citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]\u0026ndash;[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, this study seeks to transcend individualistic approaches by examining the adaptive system of digital resilience formed through simultaneous and holistic personal, social, and academic interactions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe current situation demonstrates a gap in research direction, as seen from the cultural and institutional contexts that are key factors in student digital resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Most previous findings were conducted by universities using campus-based or hybrid learning models with established digital infrastructure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e], while the context of Universitas Terbuka demonstrates greater and more comprehensive national complexity. Students face unequal internet access, limited direct interaction with lecturers and peers, and experience emotional stress due to academic isolation. These conditions demand digital resilience that is not merely reactive to technological disruptions but also proactive in managing social, emotional, and academic stress. Therefore, understanding digital resilience in educational contexts implementing open learning still needs to be expanded to capture the dynamics of student adaptation more authentically and contextually [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on other findings, most studies tend to use a quantitative approach that focuses on the relationships between variables related to digital resilience. Therefore, they are unable to fully explain the dynamic process of how students build, maintain, and reconstruct digital resilience in their teaching and learning process [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, a qualitative approach using thematic network analysis based on MAXQDA software allows for a deeper and more comprehensive exploration of meaning and provides a contextual understanding of how this adaptive system is formed through students' personal and social experiences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. This approach also opens up space for mapping the interactions between the dimensions of personal resilience, learning engagement, and digital social support as a mutually reinforcing adaptive system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecifically, in the \u003cem\u003ePlay and Games course\u003c/em\u003e in the UT PGPAUD Study Program, students are faced with a unique context where pedagogical aspects and digital creativity combine. Students are not only required to understand play theory but also to implement these concepts in activity designs that are collaborative, reflective, and adaptive to infrastructure limitations [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. This situation makes the course a natural experimental space to observe the formation of digital resilience in action, where personal as self-, social as digital support, and academic as learning engagement dimensions interact simultaneously. Through this context, the research is able to depict a vibrant, dynamic digital resilience system rooted in the authentic experiences of distance learning students. In the global literature, learning engagement is often positioned as a mediator between motivation and academic outcomes, but its role in the digital resilience system of Universitas Terbuka students has not been widely studied. The same holds true for digital social support, which is often discussed in the context of general social media but rarely examined in formal LMS-based systems. Therefore, understanding how learning engagement and digital social support interact with personal resilience is crucial for mapping students' adaptive balance between technological pressures, academic demands, and social needs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on this review, this study seeks to fill this scientific gap through a holistic exploration of how digital resilience forms and functions in the context of an open university. A qualitative approach based on networked thematic analysis was used to uncover the structure and relationships between themes that shape students' adaptive systems in facing online learning. Theoretically, this study offers a contribution to strengthening the contextual framework of digital resilience, and methodologically, it provides novelty through the application of a qualitative approach based on thematic networks something that has not been widely applied in similar studies. Thus, this study not only highlights students' resilience in the digital space but also how they grow, evolve, and build academic well-being within it..\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"RESEARCH METHODOLOGY","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eResearch Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study uses an exploratory qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) study design to understand students' subjective experiences in building digital resilience during distance learning (PJJ) at Universitas Terbuka (Open University) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. This exploratory design enabled the researcher to uncover patterns of relationships between themes through reflective thematic analysis assisted by MAXQDA 2024 software, resulting in a conceptual model of digital resilience that is systemic, adaptive, and contextual (Ismail \u0026amp; Kinchin, 2023). This approach aligns with current qualitative research trends that emphasize meaning-making and interdimensional mapping of digital learning phenomena.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eParticipants and Sampling Technique\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study participants consisted of 20 students from the Early Childhood Education (PGPAUD) Program at Universitas Terbuka who were or had taken the Play and Games course in the 2024/2025 semester. Participant selection was conducted using a purposive sampling technique that took into account the diversity of students' learning contexts and digital experiences. Inclusion criteria included: (1) actively participating in online and offline tutorials, (2) having experience facing technical and non-technical obstacles during the online learning process, and (3) being willing to provide in-depth reflection on their experiences. Demographic diversity of participants, including gender, study area, and occupational background, was maintained to ensure a comprehensive representation of experiences and strengthen the transferability of the research results. The number of participants was based on the principle of information power, where a sample size is considered sufficient when the data variation has reached thematic saturation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Empirical saturation was reached at the 18th interview, while two additional interviews were conducted for validation and member checking. This strategy optimally maintained the depth of meaning and consistency of the qualitative data.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eData Collection Procedure\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData were obtained through in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted online using the Ms. App platform. Teams and Zoom cloud meetings, with a duration of 45\u0026ndash;60 minutes per participant [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. The interview guide was developed based on the conceptual dimensions of the Digital Resilience Framework, which encompasses personal aspects such as self-regulation, digital self-efficacy, and perseverance; learning aspects such as engagement and reflective practice; and social aspects such as digital social support. Questions were structured openly to allow participants to narrate their experiences reflectively and authentically. All interviews were recorded with participants' permission, transcribed verbatim, and re-verified by them to ensure data validity (member validation). In addition to the interviews, researchers also collected field notes and reflective memos, which were used to enrich the context of interpretation. Supplemental data came from students' digital assignment documents, conversations in the Learning Management System (LMS), and online tutorial notes, which helped confirm and complement the main research findings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analysis was conducted using Reflexive Thematic Network Analysis (RNA) with the aid of MAXQDA 2024 software, which allows for systemic exploration and visualization of relationships between themes. This approach was chosen to combine the depth of phenomenological interpretation with the structural rigor of qualitative network-based analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis followed the Reflexive Thematic Analysis model [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e], which consists of five steps:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003e Data familiarization, through repeated reading of interview transcripts and field notes to understand the context and emotional tone of participants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eInitial coding (open coding), which involved identifying data segments relevant to the digital resilience phenomenon, resulting in over 180 initial code units.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eAxial coding, which involved grouping codes into thematic categories that reflected the relationships between dimensions such as Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, Digital Social Support, Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue, Adaptive Strategies, and Outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eNetwork coding, where MAXQDA was used to visualize the connectivity between themes, allowing for systematic and dynamic analysis of interdimensional relationship patterns.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThematic interpretation and validation, through critical reflection and collaborative discussions with two digital education experts, ensured alignment between the empirical data and the theoretical framework.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis process was conducted iteratively and reflectively, with each stage verifying each other to maintain the integrity of the interpretation and minimize researcher bias. The final result of the analysis was a thematic map of students' digital resilience, depicting the interaction between personal, social, and learning dimensions in the context of distance learning at Universitas Terbuka.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eResearch\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eEthics\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe validity and credibility of the research were maintained through the application of Lincoln and Guba's four trustworthiness criteria: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. Credibility was strengthened through member checking, peer debriefing, and prolonged engagement over three months, ensuring the representativeness of participants' experiences. Dependability was maintained through detailed documentation of the entire analysis process in the form of an audit trail using MAXQDA's code memo feature. Confirmability was achieved through cross-checking of interpretations by two independent qualitative methodology experts, ensuring the research results were free from researcher bias. Transferability was strengthened by an in-depth description of the learning context, student characteristics, and the distance learning process at Universitas Terbuka, allowing readers to assess the suitability of the results to other contexts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003ewas obtained from the Universitas Terbuka Ethics Committee. All participants were given a thorough explanation of the research objectives, their right to participate, and guaranteed data confidentiality. Their identities were anonymized using anonymizing codes (M01\u0026ndash;M20).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS AND DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRESULT\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe result of Qualitative analysis of interviews with 20 Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course yielded a thematic model that maps the structure of Digital Resilience as an adaptive system interconnected across dimensions. Mapping codes and subcodes in MAXQDA yielded three main domains: Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, and Digital Social Support. These dynamically interact with two categories of reinforcers and hinderers: Adaptive Strategies and Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue, as well as two main outcomes: Well-being and Learning Outcomes. This thematic map illustrates that digital resilience does not emerge in isolation but is the result of a synergy between intrapersonal skills, collaborative learning engagement, and digital social support, forming an adaptive and resilient distance learning ecosystem. This model was synthesized from all interview respondents and visualized using MAXQDA 2024 to ensure consistent traceability of relationships between themes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe MAXQDA analysis results show a complex relationship between six thematic clusters centered on the concept of Digital Resilience. The Personal Resilience cluster is characterized by emotional regulation strategies, digital efficacy, and perseverance, manifested through sub-codes such as short breathing techniques, adaptive self-reward, and frustration tolerance. This cluster is closely connected to Learning Engagement through reflective nodes such as authentic reflection, peer feedback, and timelines \u0026amp; milestones, demonstrating that collaborative and reflective learning processes strengthen students' self-regulation. On the other hand, Digital Social Support acts as a stable external reinforcement through the support of peers, lecturers, and digital infrastructure such as forums, LMS features, and WhatsApp/Telegram channels, which enable rapid response and social empathy in the face of technical obstacles and digital fatigue. The network visualization positions Learning Engagement as a bridge node, with the highest thematic proximity to Personal Resilience and consistent functional connectivity to Digital Social Support, so that the adaptive flow moves from intrapersonal to social in a structured manner.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue cluster illustrates the main sources of stress during distance learning, such as unstable connections, Zoom exhaustion, and household burden, which directly impact concentration and learning motivation. However, adaptive strategy nodes such as time-boxing, guided trial and error, and personal improvement plans demonstrate that students develop creative coping mechanisms to maintain academic performance. The strong interconnection between Learning Engagement and Outcome confirms that collaborative and reflective learning engagement results in skill transfer, improved digital literacy, and academic well-being. Thus, this network map demonstrates that UT students' digital resilience is integrative, reflective, and social-adaptive, with each dimension acting as a mutually reinforcing node to maintain balance within the distance learning ecosystem. These findings demonstrate a consistent qualitative causal pattern: stress triggers personal adaptation, adaptation facilitates learning engagement, and purposeful engagement strengthens social support and learning outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo view the data in a partial view, the following figure displays the results of thematic mapping of the Personal Resilience dimensions obtained through qualitative analysis using MAXQDA. This map illustrates the relationships between sub-codes and sub-sub-codes that shape the structure of students' personal resilience in facing the challenges of distance learning at Universitas Terbuka. This dimension focuses on how students manage emotions, build digital confidence, and maintain motivation and persistence during the Play and Games course, which demands creative and collaborative practices. The mapping reveals a high density of intra-dimensional connections, which serve as a stable foundation before adaptive energy flows into the learning and social dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic map in the figure shows that Personal Resilience consists of three main clusters: Perseverance \u0026amp; Grit, Digital Self-Efficacy, and Emotional Regulation, which interact with each other in students' adaptation system to digital stress. The Perseverance \u0026amp; Grit node is directly related to spiritual and cognitive strategies such as spiritual coping, cognitive reappraisal, and the habit of planned digital breaks, which help students maintain perseverance. Meanwhile, Digital Self-Efficacy emerges as the core of personal resilience, strengthened by concrete actions such as guided trial and error, progress feedback, and independent exploration. Meanwhile, Emotional Regulation demonstrates a pattern of emotional adaptation through daily micro-targets, adaptive self-rewards, and frustration tolerance, which encourage students to remain productive even when facing technical disruptions or high workloads. Overall, this map demonstrates that students' personal resilience is built through a balance between intrapersonal strategies (self-regulation) and interpersonal support (feedback and collaborative exploration), which together create psychological resilience to the dynamics of digital learning. Functionally, Digital Self-Efficacy emerges as a lever node, channeling the positive influence of emotional regulation and perseverance into subsequent learning engagement. This figure displays the results of the Learning Engagement dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis using MAXQDA, which illustrates how Universitas Terbuka students' learning engagement is formed in a reflective, collaborative, and structured manner through Play and Games lecture activities. This map visualizes the relationships between subcodes and sub-subcodes that represent learning engagement strategies, ranging from team collaboration, synchronous-asynchronous communication, to authentic reflection and rubric-based assessment. This dimension is an important node in the digital resilience network because it acts as a bridge between personal resilience and digital social support in the distance learning system. The placement of nodes indicates spatial proximity that marks the actual workflow, clear task design triggers authentic reflection, then strengthens effective collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic map in the figure shows that Learning Engagement consists of three main clusters: Collaborative Engagement, Authentic Reflection, and Clarity of Assignments \u0026amp; Rubrics, which reinforce each other in creating meaningful learning engagement. The Collaborative Engagement cluster is characterized by nodes such as cross-group collaboration, team accountability, and conflict resolution, demonstrating the importance of coordination and collective responsibility in virtual teams. Meanwhile, Authentic Reflection demonstrates students' reflective processes through reflective journals, after-action reviews, and peer feedback, which help them understand their learning experiences and connect them to real-world practice. The Clarity of Assignments \u0026amp; Rubrics cluster emphasizes the importance of clear instructions, standardized rubrics, and example artifacts and timelines that serve as explicit guides for students in managing assignments and expectations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, this network emphasizes that learning engagement is not only an academic activity, but also a social and reflective process that fosters self-regulation, a sense of belonging, and adaptive skills in navigating the complexities of digital learning at Universitas Terbuka. The strong link between Clarity and Authentic Reflection indicates that clarity of instructions serves as a precondition for meaningful reflection and improved collaboration. This figure shows the results of the Digital Social Support dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis of interviews with Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization was generated using MAXQDA to illustrate how digital social support functions as an external reinforcement system that supports student resilience in distance learning. This network structure demonstrates the interconnectedness of technical support, emotional support, and academic support integrated within the Universitas Terbuka digital ecosystem, creating a collaborative, responsive, and inclusive learning environment. This support acts as a buffer, stabilizing fluctuations in the learning load when technical barriers arise.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic map in the figure shows that Digital Social Support is formed through three main clusters: Peer Support, Tutor/Lecturer Support, and Community Infrastructure. The Peer Support cluster centers on support mechanisms between students through group norms, buddy systems, resource sharing, and emotional support, which strengthen a sense of togetherness and digital empathy. Tutor/Lecturer Support is visible through nodes such as targeted feedback, timely responses, clarification of instructions, and office hours, which indicate that the active presence of lecturers or tutors provides a sense of security and academic certainty for students. Meanwhile, Community Infrastructure includes technological and social elements such as LMS features, WhatsApp/Telegram channels, onboarding guides, and material repositories, which form the foundation of connectivity and resource access in online learning. Overall, this map illustrates that digital social support is not only technical assistance, but also an adaptive network that facilitates social interaction, emotional regulation, and learning collaboration, which together strengthen the digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka students in facing the challenges of distance learning. The thematic closeness between Tutor Support and Clarity of Assignments suggests a double-reinforcing effect: instructional clarification reduces technical anxiety while enhancing reflective readiness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis figure displays the results of the Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue dimension mapping obtained from qualitative analysis using MAXQDA of interviews with Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization illustrates the primary sources of digital stress and fatigue faced by students during distance learning. This dimension plays a crucial role in understanding the factors inhibiting digital resilience, particularly in the context of students balancing academic demands, technical conditions, and home environments that do not always support online learning. The findings highlight three dominant sources of stress: the household context, digital infrastructure, and prolonged screen exposure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic map in the figure shows that Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue is divided into three main clusters: Environmental Barriers, Technical Obstacles, and Digital Fatigue. The Environmental Barriers cluster encompasses challenges such as minimal family support, double working hours, household burden, and noisy study rooms, indicating that most students struggle to focus on their studies due to distractions and multiple responsibilities at home. The Technical Obstacles cluster highlights the limitations of digital resources through nodes such as limited devices, low data quotas, unstable connections, and file compatibility, which hinder smooth communication and access to learning materials.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeanwhile, Digital Fatigue depicts cognitive fatigue caused by screen overload, excessive multitasking, annoying notifications, and Zoom exhaustion, which reduce concentration and lead to learning boredom. Overall, this figure emphasizes that environmental barriers, technical constraints, and digital fatigue interact to form multidimensional pressures that need to be addressed through social support strategies, digital reflection, and more adaptive learning designs at Universitas Terbuka. Thematic correlations indicate that clarity of instructions and a proportional task rhythm reduce fatigue exposure, especially when balanced by responsive peer support. This figure presents the results of the Outcome dimension mapping from a qualitative analysis conducted using MAXQDA, depicting the final results of the process of developing digital resilience in Universitas Terbuka students in the Play and Games course. This visualization shows how the interaction between personal, social, and learning aspects contributes to the formation of adaptive outcomes such as academic well-being, increased digital literacy, and the transfer of skills to early childhood education practices. This dimension is evidence that digital resilience not only produces the ability to withstand stress, but also produces positive transformations in student performance, motivation, and creativity. The mapping positions Learning Engagement as the main link that mediates the effects of Personal and Social on learning outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic map in the figure shows that the outcomes of students' digital resilience are divided into three main clusters: Task Performance, Skill Transfer, and Academic Well-being. The Task Performance cluster highlights students' success in maintaining consistency and quality of work through indicators such as timeliness, artifact quality, and reduced revisions, indicating increased academic efficiency and responsibility. The Skill Transfer cluster illustrates students' ability to apply learning outcomes to real-world contexts, such as innovation of game ideas, application in PAUD practice, and increased digital literacy, confirming the practical relevance of the Play and Games course to the professional development of PAUD teacher candidates. Meanwhile, Academic Well-being encompasses positive emotional and social outcomes, such as a sense of belonging, learning satisfaction, and academic efficacy, indicating a balance between academic performance and psychological well-being. Overall, this map illustrates that the outcomes of the digital resilience system go beyond mere technical functionality, but develop into an adaptive, productive, and well-being-oriented learning ecosystem in distance education. The strong link between Skill Transfer and PAUD practice demonstrates the external relevance of the findings, extending the impact from the academic to the professional realm.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eDISCUSSION\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudents in this study demonstrated that their success in distance learning relied heavily on self-regulatory mechanisms for managing emotions, digital confidence, and persistence under less-than-ideal conditions. One student stated, \u003cem\u003e\"When the network drops in the middle of an assignment, I pause, take a breath, then rethink my steps: I change my upload strategy and keep going\"\u003c/em\u003e (M09). This statement illustrates that controlling emotional responses and quick reflection are crucial elements of personal resilience. Recent studies have suggested that digital resilience encompasses an individual's ability to adapt their practices in the face of technological change while maintaining the core function of learning [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. These findings confirm that self-regulation acts as an initial trigger for adaptation, which then flows into learning engagement and digital social support as further reinforcement [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, students also stated that digital self-efficacy is key: \u003cem\u003e\"At first, I was afraid to try new features in the LMS, but after several failures, I finally managed to do it on my own without a tutor. That changed my perspective: I can do it\"\u003c/em\u003e (M15). This suggests that successful technical problem-solving experiences boost self-confidence, which in turn strengthens resilience to digital uncertainty. The literature suggests that this sense of efficacy is a critical component in building sustainable digital resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. Functionally, digital efficacy acts as a \u003cem\u003e\"leverage node\u003c/em\u003e\" that shortens the distance from technical obstacles to effective problem solving action.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePerseverance, or grit, also emerged as a substantial theme when one student stated \u003cem\u003e\"Even though the connection often drops and I have to rework, I still set a daily goal: finish two slides first, then move on. If I give up, I know I'm behind\"\u003c/em\u003e (M04). Daily goal-setting and task-solving strategies become part of the intrapersonal capital that enables students not only to persist but to thrive. Thus, the Personal Resilience dimension demonstrates that students actively build self-regulation and task continuity as a foundation for effective digital adaptation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Thematic correlations indicate that grit strengthens emotional resilience and stabilizes learning rhythms in situations of uncertain connection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Learning Engagement dimension emerged as a key bridge in the digital resilience network. Students described active engagement through collaboration, authentic reflection, and task clarity as a bridge between personal effort and social support. As one student stated: \u003cem\u003e\"We worked on this game assignment as a team, so I wasn't alone: ​​the group discussions, clear rubrics, and post-presentation reflections made me feel like I was part of something\"\u003c/em\u003e (M12). This narrative demonstrates that learning engagement goes beyond simply completing tasks, but also fosters a sense of ownership and connection that strengthens adaptive networks. Recent research indicates that online learning engagement is influenced by information literacy and self-efficacy, which in turn are moderated by psychological resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e]. In other words, learning engagement mediates the influence of personal capacity toward stable academic outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthentic reflection also emerged explicitly: \u003cem\u003e\"After I upload my game idea, I write notes: what worked, what didn't, what I would change. It makes me better prepared for the next assignment\"\u003c/em\u003e (M05). These types of activities strengthen learning engagement by igniting metacognitive awareness and facilitating transfer to subsequent assignments. Thus, reflection not only improves the quality of assignments but also serves as an integration mechanism within the resilience network. Reflection acts as an internal feedback mechanism, closing the learning cycle from experience to strategy refinement. Clarity of instructions and rubrics also proved crucial: \u003cem\u003e\"The assignment rubric is displayed in the LMS, and there are also sample artifacts. So I know where to go without getting confused. It helps me take initiative\"\u003c/em\u003e (M17). The availability of clear guidelines minimizes initial barriers and allows students to focus on collaborative and creative activities. This reflects findings that learning engagement supported by structured assignment design significantly improves student adaptation to online learning [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. Learning engagement thus serves as a key node connecting self-regulation with digital social support. This placement is consistent with the thematic map, where task clarity fosters reflection, and reflection fosters collaboration [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Digital Social Support dimension demonstrates the ongoing external role within students' adaptive networks. One student stated: \u003cem\u003e\"In my friends' WhatsApp group, if I get stuck uploading an image, someone immediately helps me: 'This is my way,' 'Try this.' So I'm not alone\"\u003c/em\u003e (M01). This quote demonstrates that digital peer support provides a space for quick technical and emotional solutions, creating a sense of belonging that strengthens adaptive networks. Research shows that digital social support is positively correlated with academic well-being and digital resilience [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Peer support serves as a psychosocial cushion, reducing anxiety and accelerating recovery from technical obstacles [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, interaction with tutors or lecturers through digital channels is also important: \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I often ask tutors in forums and chat columns, and their responses are very quick, asking me to back up the files first, then \u0026lsquo;. That\u0026rsquo;s what makes me feel safe and keeps me going with my assignments even when the signal is poor\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e (M08). Quick responses and scaffolding through official channels increase trust and manage the workload. The tutor\u0026rsquo;s role contributes to clear instructions and prioritizes actions, thus reducing cognitive load when the connection is unstable. Furthermore, digital community facilities such as the LMS, RBV, MyUT, and other communication channels owned by UT serve as the foundation of social infrastructure: \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;The LMS has a chat feature, links to recorded webinar tutorials, and even allows me to create a class WhatsApp group. I use all of these well. If the assignment starts to feel overwhelming, I open the recorded webinars, chat with friends, or share my friends\u0026rsquo; discussions, and can continue with the assignment well\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e (M19). This infrastructure and facilities enable interaction, collaboration, and resources that support the collective adaptation of student networks. Thus, Digital Social Support plays an external buffer that stabilizes the adaptation process, especially when technical and environmental pressures arise. The availability of archived materials and synchronous and asynchronous channels facilitates a \u0026lsquo;recovery window\u0026rsquo; which is crucial for learning continuity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue dimension describes the multidimensional stress experienced by Universitas Terbuka students during distance learning, particularly in games and play courses. The main obstacles identified include limited infrastructure, demands from the home environment, and digital fatigue, which impacts concentration and motivation to learn. One student stated, \u003cem\u003e\"The signal often drops out, especially at night and during heavy rain. Sometimes I have to re-upload several times, which is tiring, and I end up having to start early to get the assignments done smoothly\"\u003c/em\u003e (M07). This statement demonstrates that technical glitches are not simply technological obstacles but rather a source of chronic stress that can reduce cognitive efficiency and motivation. Recent studies have shown that digital fatigue has a direct negative effect on student engagement and self-regulation in online learning, especially when environmental support is limited [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR42\" citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]\u0026ndash;[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. This finding is consistent with the cluster map, where technical obstacles correlate with decreased task rhythm and increased recovery time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to technical issues, home environmental obstacles are a significant factor in reducing learning focus. Several students expressed the need to balance family responsibilities with academic demands, as one participant stated, \u003cem\u003e\"If my kids are fussy during online lectures, I have to stop. Sometimes the material just flies by\"\u003c/em\u003e (M03). This situation highlights that disproportionate domestic burdens lead to fragmented learning time and reduce the effectiveness of online participation. Household contextual factors in distance learning environments can exacerbate digital fatigue by decreasing focus and increasing mental stress. Thus, students' socio-ecological contexts play a crucial role in shaping their digital resilience capacity. Consequently, learning design needs to provide flexible rhythms and easily accessible learning resources [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeanwhile, digital fatigue also manifests as a form of persistent psycho-physiological stress. One student stated, \u003cem\u003e\"I often feel dizzy from staring at the screen for too long, especially if the assignments are long and the webinar tutorials are long. But if I leave online learning, I'm afraid I'll miss out. So I keep going even though my head is heavy and I'm feeling unwell\"\u003c/em\u003e (M10). This phenomenon illustrates a state of cognitive exhaustion that builds up due to prolonged digital exposure, which aligns with the concept of Zoom fatigue in global literature [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Digital fatigue triggers decreased learning engagement and intrinsic motivation, and increases the risk of academic burnout in online learning contexts [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]. In this context, Universitas Terbuka students not only struggle with technical pressures but also face the psychological burden of excessive digital connectivity. Therefore, reflective and adaptive strategies such as planned digital breaks and time-boxing are urgently needed to maintain a balance between academic performance and mental well-being [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. The habit of planned breaks and task pacing are the most frequently reported strategies to break the chain of fatigue.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Outcome dimension represents the final result of the digital resilience process, which has been built through the interaction of personal resilience, learning engagement, and digital social support. Students who demonstrated high adaptive capacity reported significant improvements in three key aspects: academic well-being, task performance, and skill transfer. One student stated, \u003cem\u003e\"Now I feel calmer when assignments are difficult because I know how to manage my time and ask for help when needed. My grades are also more stable than last semester\"\u003c/em\u003e (M02). This narrative illustrates the successful integration of self-regulated learning with digital social support, which has a positive impact on emotional balance and academic achievement [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. Academic well-being significantly improves when students are able to manage digital stress through reflection and active social engagement. Thus, academic well-being emerges as a composite outcome of personal strategies supported by social structures [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproved task performance is also evident in students' ability to manage time and complete assignments with better quality. One student said, \u003cem\u003e\"I used to panic when uploads failed, but now I have a backup plan. I also learn to revise from my friends' feedback\"\u003c/em\u003e (M14). This demonstrates how feedback literacy and proactive strategies contribute to improved academic performance. Improved learning adaptability and the ability to manage feedback effectively are key indicators of students' growing digital resilience. In this context, students become not only technology users but also reflective learners capable of transforming digital stress into opportunities for self-development. Improved work cycles, from planning to feedback-based revision, reduce the need for re-correction and improve the quality of artifacts [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe final aspect, skill transfer, confirms that learning in the Play and Games course has a long-term impact on the professional practice of prospective early childhood education teachers. One student said, \u003cem\u003e\"I tried the game idea I created in my assignment yesterday at the early childhood education school where I did my internship, and the children enjoyed it. So it's not just theory, but it can be directly implemented\"\u003c/em\u003e (M20). This statement demonstrates that digital resilience not only improves learning efficacy but also produces practical skills in real-world work contexts. These findings demonstrate that reflective digital learning enhances skill transfer across contexts through adaptive and collaborative mechanisms. Thus, the outcome of digital resilience is not simply about surviving in the online ecosystem but also about building relevant competencies for professional sustainability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e]. The strong link between assignment products and field practice underscores the external relevance of learning for performance in Early Childhood Education (ECE).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, all of the above dimensions collectively illustrate that digital resilience in distance learning students is systemic and dynamic, not simply an individual's resilience to technical disruptions, but an active integration of self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social networks. For each student, the adaptation pathway follows a pattern where obstacles (technical/environmental) trigger self-regulation (Personal Resilience), which is strengthened through learning engagement, and then supported through digital social networks (Digital Social Support), resulting in positive outcomes such as task performance and academic well-being. Universitas Terbuka students are able to transform technical obstacles, environmental stress, and digital fatigue into reflective and adaptive momentum through social support and collaborative learning strategies. When digital resilience develops, the end result is not only improved academic performance but also the development of psychological well-being and professional readiness [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, distance learning at Universitas Terbuka can be viewed as an adaptive ecosystem that combines emotional, social, and cognitive aspects to shape resilient and reflective students in the digital age.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the results of this research synthesis indicate that the digital resilience process of Universitas Terbuka students operates as a structured adaptive system. The MAXQDA network map displays a consistent sequential pattern, where initial stressors, including technical, environmental, and psychological factors, trigger the activation of personal adaptation strategies, which then develop into reflective engagement through collaboration, task clarity, and metacognitive practices. This reflective engagement is reinforced by digital social support from peers, tutors, and the learning infrastructure, ultimately resulting in academic outcomes such as well-being, more stable task performance, and the transfer of skills to professional practice. This process demonstrates that digital resilience is not a single response, but rather a multi-layered mechanism that reinforces emotional, cognitive, social, and pedagogical aspects in the context of distance learning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, distance learning at Universitas Terbuka creates an adaptive ecosystem that enables students to transform digital stressors into opportunities for academic and professional growth. Digital resilience emerges not simply as a coping skill, but as a reflective and collaborative competency that fosters academic well-being, learning independence, and work readiness. Thus, student success in distance learning is determined not only by technology, but also by their ability to integrate self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social support as the foundation for resilient and sustainable learning in the post-digital era.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe results of this study confirm that the digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka students in distance learning is a multi-layered, mutually reinforcing adaptive system. The adaptation process begins with digital pressures, whether technical, environmental, or psychological, which are then responded to through self-regulation mechanisms, strengthening digital efficacy, and perseverance in managing tasks. This personal adaptation develops into a more reflective and collaborative learning engagement, characterized by clear instructions, authentic reflective practices, and synergistic team interactions. Meanwhile, digital social support from peers, tutors, and the learning infrastructure serves as a stabilizing force, maintaining learning continuity when pressure increases. The integration of these three dimensions forms a consistent pattern of adaptation, where each component acts as a node that flows reinforcement towards improved learning outcomes emotionally, academically, and professionally. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that digital resilience is not just a coping skill, but rather a social-reflective capacity that enables students to build academic well-being, improve task performance, and transfer skills to professional practice, including in the Early Childhood Education (ECE) context, which is the primary focus of the Play and Games course. By viewing digital resilience as a system, rather than a single variable, this study emphasizes that the success of distance learning relies heavily on a balance between self-regulation, learning engagement, and digital social support. These findings provide important implications: distance learning design needs to integrate self-regulation strategies, digital reflection spaces, adaptive social support, and clear, experience-oriented task structures. In this way, Universitas Terbuka can continue to develop a resilient, inclusive, and sustainable learning ecosystem, preparing students to become independent learners and professionals ready to face the challenges of the post-digital era.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), under the auspices of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. This research was conducted within the framework of the EQUITY Program. The authors extend their sincere appreciation for the support that made this study possible.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSri tatminingsih (1st Author and Corresponding Author) -Conceptualized the review, designed the methodology, conducted the literature search and data extraction, performed initial data analysis and interpretation, drafted the manuscript.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDony Darma Sagita (2nd) - Assisted with designing the methodology, conducted literature search and data validation, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, revised the manuscript for critical intellectual content, reviewed and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis paper is funded by the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) on behalf of the Indonesian Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology and managed under the EQUITY Program\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Universitas Terbuka. The research protocol was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with relevant national research guidelines. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the voluntary nature of participation, their right to withdraw at any time, and the confidentiality of their responses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDeclaration of Generative AI\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUse During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Chat GPT in order as a tools were used to assist in the structuring, clarity of language, and coherence of arguments in this paper . After using this tool/service, the author reviewed and edited the content as necessary and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of Interest\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study discussed in this correspondence was conducted independently and without any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the work. The views expressed in this letter are solely those of the authors and are not influenced by any external parties or institutions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticipants provided consent for anonymized quotations from interviews to be used in academic publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical trial number\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenavides LMC, Tamayo Arias JA, Arango Serna MD, Branch JW, Bedoya, Burgos D. Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3291.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGkrimpizi T, Peristeras V, Magnisalis I. Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Educ Sci. 2023;13(7):746.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeal Filho W et al. Digital transformation and sustainable development in higher education in a post-pandemic world,., 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDarojat O, Idrus O, Ardıasıh LS. Disruptive change and learning innovations: Challenges and opportunities for Universitas Terbuka. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2023;24(3):60\u0026ndash;70.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYunus M, Yuliana E. The challenges of open and distance learning in managing practicums/practical courses during the Covid-19 pandemic: Universitas Terbuka case study. ASEAN J Open Distance Learn. 2020;12(2):48\u0026ndash;59.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun H, Yuan C, Qian Q, He S, Luo Q. Digital resilience among individuals in school education settings: a concept analysis based on a scoping review. Front psychiatry. 2022;13:858515.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSolekhah DZ, Sakdiyah F, Silvia F. Digital Mindset And Student Resilience: A Post-Pandemic Study On Learning Motivation In Indonesian High Schools. Educ J Sos Hum dan Pendidik. 2025;5(2):27\u0026ndash;38.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026Ouml;zt\u0026uuml;rk F, \u0026Ccedil;alışkan B, Oğuz-Duran N. Digital Resilience. Eur Psychol, 2025.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYasir M, Ullah A, Siddique M, Hamid Z, Khan N. The capabilities, challenges, and resilience of digital learning as a tool for education during the COVID-19, 2022.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGe D. Resilience and online learning emotional engagement among college students in the digital age: a perspective based on self-regulated learning theory. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):326.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBylieva D, Hong J-C, Lobatyuk V, Nam T. Self-regulation in e-learning environment. Educ Sci. 2021;11(12):785.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen F. The relationship between digital literacy and college students\u0026rsquo; academic achievement: the chain mediating role of learning adaptation and online self-regulated learning. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1590649.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAng WHD, et al. Resilience for undergraduate students: development and evaluation of a theory-driven, evidence-based and learner centered digital resilience skills enhancement (RISE) program. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12729.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao Z, Ma Y, Zhu H, Zhang Y, Obaid A. The relationships among self-control, psychological resilience, and digital addiction in college students: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1650148.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQi C, Yang N. Digital resilience and technological stress in adolescents: A mixed-methods study of factors and interventions. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(14):19067\u0026ndash;113.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang X, Wang Y. The impact of perceived social support on e-learning engagement among college students: serial mediation of growth mindset and subjective well-being. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2024;39(4):4163\u0026ndash;80.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang S, Wang Y, Zhao L. Effects of psychological resilience on online learning performance and satisfaction among undergraduates: The mediating role of academic burnout. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2025;34(1):395\u0026ndash;409.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun Y, Liu L. Structural equation modeling of university students\u0026rsquo; academic resilience academic well-being, personality and educational attainment in online classes with Tencent Meeting application in China: Investigating the role of student engagement. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):347.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDhovier I, Maryam EW. Resiliensi Mahasiswa yang Bekerja. J Islam Psychol. 2024;1(1):10.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHariadi B, Sunarto MJ, Sudarmaningtyas P. Hybrid learning by using brilian applications as one of the learning alternatives to improve learning outcomes in college. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(10):34\u0026ndash;45.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArdi Z, Putra AH, Mulia FD. Resiliensi Akademik: Fondasi Sukses Pendidikan. CV Eureka Media Aksara; 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStenalt MH. Digital student agency: Approaching agency in digital contexts from a critical perspective. Front Learn Res. 2021;9(3):52\u0026ndash;68.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGregersen EM, Astrupgaard SL, Jespersen MH, G\u0026aring;rdhus TP, Albris K. Digital dependence: Online fatigue and coping strategies during the COVID-19 lockdown. Media Cult Soc. 2023;45(5):967\u0026ndash;84.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRizzo A, Aquilina R, Falzon R. Applying MAXQDA in a Grounded Theory Study: Evaluation, \u003cem\u003eComputer Supported Qualitative Research: New Trends in Qualitative Research (WCQR2024)\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 1061. p. 175, 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFadlillah M. Buku ajar bermain \u0026amp; permainan anak usia dini. Prenada Media; 2019.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElattar NF, Zaki HN, Barakat MM. Effect of Online Learning on Psychological Wellbeing, Academic Resilience, and self-efficacy of students during COVID-19 pandemic. Zagazig Nurs J. 2024;20(1):314\u0026ndash;31.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOxley L. An examination of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Educ Child Psychol, 33, 3, 2016.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMalterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753\u0026ndash;60.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahat-Shamir M, Neimeyer RA, Pitcho-Prelorentzos S. Designing in-depth semi-structured interviews for revealing meaning reconstruction after loss. Death Stud. 2021;45(2):83\u0026ndash;90.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBraun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77\u0026ndash;101. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1191/1478088706qp063oa\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1191/1478088706qp063oa\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed SK. The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. J Med Surg Public Heal. 2024;2:100051.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYe F, et al. Impact of digital technology usage on firm resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2024;29(1):162\u0026ndash;75.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoetekouw L, Angelopoulos S. Digital resilience through training protocols: Learning to identify fake news on social media. Inf Syst Front. 2024;26(2):459\u0026ndash;75.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQi R, Ma G, Liu C, Zhang Q, Wang Q. Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain resilience. Financ Res Lett. 2024;66:105564.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEastin MS, LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J Comput Commun. 2000;6(1):JCMC611.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStoffel JM, Cain J. Review of grit and resilience literature within health professions education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):6150.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang L. The role of students\u0026rsquo; self-regulated learning, grit, and resilience in second language learning. Front Psychol. 2021;12:800488.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang Y-D, Zhou C-L, Wang Z-Q. The relationship between self-control and learning engagement among Chinese college students: the chain mediating roles of resilience and positive emotions. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1331691.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShao Y, Kang S. The association between peer relationship and learning engagement among adolescents: The chain mediating roles of self-efficacy and academic resilience. Front Psychol. 2022;13:938756.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIsmail N, Kinchin G. Construct of phenomenological analysis: case study of interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA). Egypt Sch J. 2023;2(1):7\u0026ndash;17.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarotta A, Centofanti C, Di Sciullo G, Antonelli C, Graziosi F, Valcarenghi L. A Resilient Passive Optical Network Architecture Based on Dynamic Spatial Aggregation, in 2025 \u003cem\u003e25th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON)\u003c/em\u003e, 2025, pp. 1\u0026ndash;4.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSagita DD, Amsal MF. Integrating acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) into adolescent health interventions: addressing the links between sleep, obesity, and mental health., \u003cem\u003eJournal of affective disorders\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 393, no. Pt B. Netherlands, p. 120472, Jan. 2026. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jad.2025.120472\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120472\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNesher Shoshan H, Wehrt W. Understanding \u0026lsquo;Zoom fatigue\u0026rsquo;: A mixed-method approach. Appl Psychol. 2022;71(3):827\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin S-H, Huang Y-C. Life stress and academic burnout. Act Learn High Educ. 2014;15(1):77\u0026ndash;90.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu Z, Xie Y, Sun Z, Liu D, Yin H, Shi L. Factors associated with academic burnout and its prevalence among university students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):317.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSimarmata SW, Batubara A, Sagita DD, Violina EI, Syaikhu A, Simangunsong J. Rational emotive behavior therapy for preventing smoking initiation among school children: Addressing peer influence and social susceptibility., \u003cem\u003eJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 20, no. 5. Saudi Arabia, pp. 726\u0026ndash;727, Oct. 2025. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.09.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.09.008\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnthonysamy L, Ah K, Choo, Soon Hin H. Investigating Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Digital Learning relevancy. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2021;18(1):29\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYen M, Chen S, Wang C, Chen H, Hsu Y, Liu T. A framework for self-regulated digital learning (SRDL). J Comput Assist Learn. 2018;34(5):580\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen F, et al. Multi-ancestry transcriptome-wide association analyses yield insights into tobacco use biology and drug repurposing. Nat Genet. 2023;55(2):291\u0026ndash;300.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeng C, Puspitasari D, Rathinasabapathi A, Kuo A. Reflective learning as an important key to the success of an online course. Behav Inf Technol. 2022;41(15):3382\u0026ndash;98.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColomer J, Serra T, Ca\u0026ntilde;abate D, Bubnys R. Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3827. MDPI.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"discover-psychology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"discpsy","sideBox":"Learn more about [Discover Psychology](https://www.springer.com/44202)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Discover Psychology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Discover Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Digital resilience, Distance learning, Play and Games course, Universitas Terbuka","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDigital transformation in distance learning requires students to have digital resilience as an adaptive ability to face technical, emotional, and social pressures that arise during online learning. This study aims to explore the structure and dynamics of digital resilience of Universitas Terbuka (UT) students, specifically in the Play and Games course that emphasizes collaborative and creative practices. Using a qualitative interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 students and analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Network Analysis assisted by MAXQDA 2024. The results revealed that students' digital resilience is formed as an adaptive system consisting of three main dimensions: Personal Resilience, Learning Engagement, and Digital Social Support that interact with two supporting and inhibiting factors (Adaptive Strategies and Obstacles \u0026amp; Fatigue). Students develop strategies for emotional regulation, digital efficacy, and perseverance to maintain learning motivation amidst network limitations, household burdens, and digital fatigue. Learning engagement acts as a conceptual bridge connecting personal resilience with digital social support through authentic reflection, team collaboration, and task clarity. Peer support, tutoring, and UT's digital infrastructure proved to be external buffers that stabilized the adaptation process and enhanced academic well-being. These findings confirm that digital resilience is not simply an individual's ability to cope, but rather a social-reflective system that fosters academic well-being and professional readiness. Practical implications: Distance learning design should emphasize the integration of digital reflection, adaptive social support, and self-regulation strategies as the foundation for resilient and sustainable learning in the post-digital era.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Digital Resilience in Distance Learning among Early Childhood Students in the Play and Games Course at Universitas Terbuka","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-25 15:30:09","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8725057/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-03-10T11:22:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-06T03:35:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-02T13:13:32+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-02T07:19:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-01T02:10:22+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-02-27T05:40:03+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-02-25T20:37:34+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"6898806404129313418887936474518881447","date":"2026-02-25T20:08:06+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"216768969779473506818480713069471577674","date":"2026-02-23T00:55:14+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"197018847587940119000073390586824658412","date":"2026-02-21T13:15:04+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"269665443869432963775429543142287904275","date":"2026-02-21T10:10:14+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"132925992270319238252650749613113178658","date":"2026-02-21T07:32:39+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"102581741060460534334348723150597493723","date":"2026-02-21T02:25:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"138926581286852196608218716982578170947","date":"2026-02-21T01:31:47+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-20T16:29:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-02-19T11:13:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-02-19T08:42:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Discover Psychology","date":"2026-02-19T08:36:35+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"discover-psychology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"discpsy","sideBox":"Learn more about [Discover Psychology](https://www.springer.com/44202)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Discover Psychology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Discover Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4be3a17b-b23e-4078-9f21-fb6923598cde","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 25th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-23T18:38:19+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-25 15:30:09","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8725057","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8725057","identity":"rs-8725057","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}