Physician Communication, Repeated Healthcare Encounters, and Diagnostic Delay in Endometriosis: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis

In: Healthcare · 2026 · vol. 14(19) , pp. 3237 · doi:10.3390/healthcare14193237 · W7215056068
article OA: gold CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-05 ⓘ

This cross-sectional study of Romanian women with surgically confirmed endometriosis found that diagnostic delay was associated with earlier symptom onset and repeated healthcare encounters rather than symptom severity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is often diagnosed years after symptom onset, while communication-related factors remain poorly defined in Central and Eastern Europe. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 Romanian women reporting surgically confirmed endometriosis completed an online questionnaire on diagnostic history and patient–physician communication, assessed with a seven-item Likert scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.836). Results: Mean diagnostic delay was 9.1 years (median 8; IQR 4–13), with 5.2 physicians and 10.2 consultations before diagnosis. Delay was unrelated to symptom severity (r = 0.07, p = 0.43) but inversely related to age at symptom onset (r = −0.68). Adolescent-onset symptoms were followed by a 14.9-year delay versus 5.8 years for adult-onset symptoms. In multivariable analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.49), earlier onset and more consultations remained independently associated with delay. Communication had an indirect association through consultation number (effect −0.68; 95% bootstrap CI −1.26 to −0.22), accounting for 38% of the total association; direction cannot be inferred from cross-sectional data. Symptom minimization (76%) was linked to more physicians and longer delays (10.0 vs. 6.0 years; d = 0.60). Conclusions: Earlier onset and repeated healthcare encounters were related to delay than symptom severity. The self-selected, urban, highly educated sample limits generalizability and causal interpretation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-05T06:10:06.749997+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK