Methods
Cell culture
NK-92 cells (CRL-2407, ATCC) were cultured in Myelocult TM H5100 media
(StemCell Technologies) supplemented with 100 units/mL recombinant IL-2 IS (130-
097-744, Miltenyi) and 11% horse serum (26050088, Gibco). Jurkat T cells (TIB-152,
ATCC) were cultured in RPMI-1640 media (30-2001, ATCC). RAW 264.7 macrophages
(TIB-71, ATCC), DAOY medulloblastoma cells (HTB-186, ATCC), and osteosarcoma
cell lines (LM7, OS-17) were cultured in DMEM media (30-2002, ATCC). Cells were
grown at 37°C and 5% CO
2.
Cell labeling procedure
NK-92 cells were labeled by co-incubation of 0.6 x 10 6 NK-92 cells in 500 mL
serum-free media containing 50 µg or 200 µg Fe/mL VivoTrax (Magnetic Insight Inc.,
Alameda, CA) magnetic particles for 4 hours. After 4 hours, an equal volume of serum-
containing medium was added to cell culture, for the remaining 16-hour incubation with
VivoTrax. Cell-free (sedimentation) controls contained 50 µg, or 200 µg Fe/mL VivoTrax
in the same volume of media without NK-92 cells.
For comparison of cell labeling across multiple cell types, Jurkat T cells were
labeled with VivoTrax with the same protocol using 200 µg Fe/mL VivoTrax. Likewise,
RAW 264.7 macrophages were labeled with 200 µg Fe/mL VivoTrax and were seeded
the day prior to allow adherence of cells to the flask for labeling.
At the end of the 24-hour co-incubation period, cells were washed to remove
excess iron oxide nanoparticles. NK-92 and Jurkat T cell suspensions were transferred
to 15 mL Falcon tubes. To obtain cell suspension of adherent RAW 264.7
macrophages, cells were detached using trypsin (0.25% trypsin-EDTA, 25200056,
Gibco). Cells were suspended in 10 mL serum-containing media, mixed gently, and
centrifuged at 300 g for 8 minutes. This washing procedure was repeated a total of 3
times to remove extracellular iron from labeled cells. Sedimentation (no cell) controls
were washed by the same protocol. Cell counting were performed with Cellometer
(Nexcelom Bioscience) or Vi-cell (Beckman) counters then cells were used for cytology
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
and cell staining, prepared as cell pellets for determination of iron labeling and MPI limit
of detection, or used for cell functional assays.
Assessment of cell labeling
For qualitative cell labeling assessment using histology, VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells were centrifuged onto Cytospin glass slides at a density of 1 x 10 5 cells (Cytospin
4 centrifuge, Thermo Scientific). Attached cells were then fixed by methanol/acetic acid
solution (3:1) stained with Perl’s Prussian blue with nuclear fast red as counterstain
(Iron stain kit, ab150674, abcam). Slides were dehydrated (incubation with 75, 95, and
100% ethanol) and incubated with xylene before coverslipping. Cytospin slides were
imaged using an Olympus IX81 microscope with 20x objective lens. The percentage of
labeled cells was calculated as (number of cells with iron staining) / (total number of
cells) * 100% and was measured from 7 FOVs per slide.
For quantitative cell labeling assessment using MPI, NK-92 cell pellets containing
1 x 10
6 cells were prepared for each VivoTrax concentration (50 vs. 200 µg Fe/mL). The
equivalent volume of suspension from sedimentation controls were also prepared. NK-
92 cell pellets were imaged on a MOMENTUM TM preclinical scanner (Magnetic Insight)
using the following parameters: 2D field of view (FOV) = 6 x 6 cm, transmit axes = x and
z (multichannel imaging), gradient strength = 3.055 T/m, RF amplitude = 20 mT (x-axis)
and 23 mT (z-axis), excitation frequency = 45 kHz, averages = 1. To determine cellular
detection limit for preclinical MPI, a dilution series of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells,
Jurkat T cells, and RAW 264.7 macrophages were prepared by serial 1:1 dilutions from
1 x 10
6 cells. These cell pellets were imaged on preclinical MOMENTUM imager using
the same parameters. Analysis and quantification of MPI signal for cell pellets and
sedimentation controls is described below.
For quantitative cell labeling assessment using colorimetric iron assay kit, 2 x 106
labeled NK-92 cells, Jurkat T cells, and RAW 264.7 macrophages were digested with 5
mL concentrated (67-70%) nitric acid and heated to 120 °C for complete evaporation of
acid. The remaining iron nitrate salt was allowed to cool then quantified using a
colorimetric iron assay kit with 3 technical replicates for each cell type (MAK025,
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Sigma). The total iron from 3 technical replicates was averaged then divided by the
number of cells to obtain calculated pg Fe/cell.
Measurement of NK cell activity
NK-92 cell viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion assay and Vi-cell
counter (Beckman). For NK-92 cytotoxicity assay with DAOY medulloblastoma cells,
DAOY cells were engineered to stably express firefly luciferase (ffluc) then were seeded
in a 96 well plate (10,000 cells /well) overnight. Unlabeled or VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells (at concentration 200 µg Fe/mL) were added at various effector-to-target (E/T)
ratios to interact at 37°C for 4 h. A final concentration of 0.15 mg/ml D-luciferin
(PerkinElmer; #122799) was added to each well for analysis of surviving cell. The plate
was read by a CLARIOstar Plus multi-mode plate reader (Cary, NC, USA) for
luminescence counts per second (relative light units, RLU).
For the NK-92 cell cytotoxicity assay with osteosarcoma cells, LM7-GFP and
OS17-GFP cells were seeded in a 96 well plate (10,000 cells/well). Unlabeled or
VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells (at concentration 200ug Fe/mL) were added at various
effector-to-target ratios to interact at 37 °C for 4 h. The green fluorescence of LM7-GFP
and OS17-GFP cells was measured using an IncuCyte
® S3 Live-Cell Analysis
Instrument. Green fluorescent area (in μm2) was compared across the various effector-
to-target ratios. These measurements were also compared with spontaneous death
(media) and maximum death (2% Triton) controls to calculate Percent Specific Lysis
using the following formula: [(spontaneous death GFP area – test GFP
area)/(spontaneous death GFP area – maximum death GFP area)]*100.
Proliferation of Jurkat T cells, and raw264.7 macrophages was assessed using
quantitative colorimetric MTS assay (ab197010, Abcam), after incubation with a range
of VivoTrax concentrations (0-400 µg Fe/mL) for 24 hours. This assay was conducted in
accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) documentation
19007.
44
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Implantation of NK cells in mouse organs
To assess feasibility for NK-92 cell detection with MPI for medulloblastoma and
osteosarcoma, NK-92 cells were implanted to mouse cerebellum or tibias. C57BL/6
mice of approximately 6-8 months were euthanized and their brains and tibias were
harvested prior to cell implantation. Further, to represent treatment for osteosarcoma
lung metastasis, NK-92 cells were implanted into the lungs of euthanized mice, as
described below. A summary of our NK-92 cell implantations to mouse organs is
outlined in Table 1 and described in detail below. Implanted NK-92 cells were unlabeled
(control) or labeled using the protocol described above with a concentration of 200 µg
Fe/mL. An equal number of male and female mice organs were used for this study.
Table 1. Summary of mouse organs from euthanized C57BL/6 mice and injection
strategy. For each organ, the NK-92 cell labeling, cell dose (M = million), and sample
size are tabulated.
Mouse organ NK92 labeling Dosage n
Brain VivoTrax 0.5 M /3 µL 2
Unlabeled 0.5M/3 µL 2
VivoTrax 1M/3 µL 2
Unlabeled 1M/3 µL 2
Tibia VivoTrax 0.5M/3 µL 3
Unlabeled 0.5M/3 µL 3
VivoTrax 1M/3 µL 3
Unlabeled 1M/3 µL 3
Lungs VivoTrax 0.5M/3 µL 4
Unlabeled 0.5M/3 µL 4
VivoTrax 1M/3 µL 4
Unlabeled 1M/3 µL 4
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
For brains, we implanted 5 x 10 5 NK-92 cells (n = 2 VivoTrax labeled; n = 2
unlabeled) or 1 x 10 6 NK-92 cells (n = 2 VivoTrax labeled; n = 2 unlabeled) suspended
in 3 µL saline. NK-92 cells were implanted in the mouse cerebellum with coordinates: 2
mm lateral (right) and 2 mm caudal of lambda using a stereotaxic device and a 10 μ L
Hamilton syringe. The needle was inserted at a depth of 2.5 mm, and the cell solution
was injected at a rate of 1.0 µL/min.
For legs, NK-92 cells were injected through the proximal end of the tibia.
Injections consisted of 5 x 105 NK-92 cells (n = 3 VivoTrax labeled; n = 3 unlabeled) or 1
x 106 NK-92 cells (n = 3 VivoTrax labeled; n = 3 unlabeled) suspended in 3 µL saline.
The skin and hair were left intact on the removed legs during the injection. A 30-gauge
needle was used to gently drill through the kneecap of the dissected leg and then the
needle was pulled back slightly to create a small space for injected NK-92 cells into the
tibia with the goal of injecting the cells into the middle of the tibia.
For lungs, VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells were injected into the dissected lungs on
the left side from a euthanized mouse through the primary bronchus, with unlabelled
NK-92 cells injected into the contralateral side of the lungs (right side). The heart was
dissected along with the lungs to allow for orientation of the organs. To prevent the cells
from flowing out of the lungs or into the other side of the lungs, a knot was tied around
the left and right primary bronchi where they meet the trachea which allowed for
separation of the two sides of the lungs for VivoTrax-labeled and unlabeled NK-92 cells
to be compared. Differently colored thread was used to identify which side received
unlabeled vs. VivoTrax- labeled NK-92 cells. This was repeated for 0.5 x 10
6 cells (n = 4
lungs) or 1.0 x 106 cells (n = 4 lungs).
Immediately after NK-92 cell injections to brains, lungs, and legs, organs were
placed into individual tubes and flask frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen organs were
shipped to Magnetic Insight for MPI. In a separate experiment, we studied MPI signal
stability with a freeze-thaw cycle for frozen VivoTrax and VivoTrax-labeled cells
(Supplementary Figure 1).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
MPI of mouse organs
MPI was performed for each mouse organ on a MOMENTUM MPI scanner to
assess cell location. At the beginning of the imaging session, a 2D image was acquired
of the empty sample holder to assess background signal levels. Each mouse organ was
imaged individually by placement in the center of the imaging holder. MPI projections
were acquired in 2D with the following parameters: FOV = 12 x 6 cm, transmit axes = x
and z (multichannel imaging), gradient strength = 5.7 T/m, RF amplitude = 20 mT (x-
axis) and 23 mT (z-axis), averages = 1. 3D imaging was performed with the following
parameters: FOV = 12 x 6 x 6 cm, 35 projections, and reconstruction using Filtered
Back Projection. During 3D imaging, three fiducials with 10% VivoTrax (in 1 µL) were
included to localize NK-92 cell signal in tissue.
Imaging NK cells on clinical-scale MPI
For phantom testing at the human scale, a clinically relevant dose (40 x 10 6) of
NK-92 cells was labeled using the labeling protocol with 200 µg Fe/mL media and then
pelleted in a 15 mL Falcon tube. These NK-92 cells were imaged using a clinical coil
with inner diameter (ID) = 25 cm. The imaging pulse sequence scans a 20 cm (x) x 20
cm (y) x 3 cm (z) Field of View and has an image acquisition time of 5.5 minutes.
For sensitivity limit studies, a small detection coil (ID = 2 cm) was used. Cell
pellets imaged with the coil included: 1 x 10
6 VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells labeled with
50 µg Fe/mL (n = 3 pellets) or 200 µg Fe/mL (n = 3 pellets), and dilution series of T cells
and macrophages. The imaging pulse sequence scans a 20 cm (x) x 20 cm (y) x 1 cm
(z) Field of View and has an image acquisition time of 6.4 minutes.
The clinical-scale MPI device used in this experiment has a 60 cm magnet-free
bore and produces images using a field free point (FFP) with a 0.28 x 0.28 x 0.55 T/m
gradient strength.
MPI analysis and quantification
We analysed 2D MPI images to quantify MPI signal from cell pellets (NK-92, T
cells, and macrophages) and mouse organs (brains, legs, lungs). MPI dicom files were
analyzed in MagImage software (Magnetic Insight, Inc.). For display, an MPI color bar
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
was applied to images. 2D projection images were windowed/leveled to a uniform range
for each organ to visualize differences in MPI signal due to varying number of injected
cells. For MPI signal quantification, the standard deviation of background levels was
determined (SD
bkg) from image(s) of the empty sample holder. A threshold of 5 * SD bkg
was used to select and then sum signals from cells/organs imaged with 2D MPI. 45 If
there was no signal exceeding this threshold (e.g., control organs that received
unlabeled cells), MPI signal was measured from a circular region of similar volume and
localized over the region where the organ was positioned.
We analysed 3D MPI images to measure the location of cell implantation to
mouse brains, legs, or lungs. 3D images were displayed as maximum intensity
projections (MIP) along with individual slice views for each of three anatomical planes,
using standard radiologic convention for orientation. The distances between maximum
signals from fiducials and NK-92 cell signal were measured to calculate and verify the
injection site. The MPI analyst was blinded to the stereotactic coordinates for NK-92 cell
injection.
Statistics
Unpaired t-tests were used for cytotoxicity assay to compare RLU from DAOY
cells across NK-92 cell labeling (labeled vs. unlabeled) (n = 3). For each mouse organ,
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was
used to compare MPI signal measured from different cell numbers (unlabeled NK-92
cells vs. 0.5x10
6 labeled NK-92 cells vs. 1x10 6 labeled NK-92 cells). Statistical
comparisons were considered significant if p < .05.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Results
In vitro analysis of NK-92 cell labeling
To qualitatively assess iron labeling of NK-92 cells, we performed Perl’s Prussian
blue staining and verified the presence of iron within NK-92 cells at both labeling
concentrations (50 and 200 µg Fe/mL) ( Fig 1.a ). Approximately 11% of NK-92 cells
were Prussian blue positive at 50 µg Fe/mL and 26% of NK-92 cells were Prussian blue
positive at 200 µg Fe/mL.
MPI of NK-92 cell pellets (1 x 10 6 cells) is shown in Fig. 1b . On average,
integrated MPI signal was 6.8x higher for NK-92 cells labeled at 200 µg Fe/mL
compared to 50 µg Fe/mL (Fig. 1c). Sedimentation controls indicate approximately 10%
of the MPI signal was associated with extracellular iron at the 50 µg Fe/mL condition. At
200 µg Fe/mL, the sedimentation control indicated that approximately 41% of MPI signal
was associated with extracellular iron. As determined by the quantitative iron assay kit,
average NK-92 cell labeling was 3.17 pg/cell. For comparison, macrophage labeling
was 10.34 pg/cell and Jurkat T cell labeling was 2.03 pg/cell, obtained using the same
labeling protocol.
The lowest number of NK-92 cells detected by preclinical MPI was 3.1 x 10
4
cells. Comparatively, the fewest number of T cells detected was 3.1 x 10 4 cells and the
fewest number of macrophages detected was 8 x 10 3 cells (Fig. 1d). MPI signal was
directly linear with cell number for NK-92 cells, T cells, and macrophages (R 2 > 0.96).
The slope of the line of best fit for macrophages was 4x higher than NK-92 cells and
4.4x higher than T cells, reflecting cellular uptake by these cell types. Demonstration of
preclinical MPI detection of the lowest cell numbers is shown in Fig. 1e.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 1. a. Perl’s Prussian blue (PPB) staining showed positive iron staining
associated with VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 ce lls using both labeling concentrations. B.
Comparing MPI signal from VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cell pellets (1 x 10 6 cells), labeled
at 50 or 200 µg Fe/mL. c. MPI signal quantification s hows higher signal from NK- 92
cells labeled at 200 µg Fe/mL compared to 50 µg Fe/mL. However, there was also
increases in MPI signal from sedimentation (sed) controls used to estimate free iron, as
shown in red. D. A dilution series of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells, T cells, and
macrophages labeled using the same protocol imaged by MPI. The limit of detection
was determined as 31x10 3 (31k) for NK-92 cells and T cells and 8x10 3 (8k) for
macrophages. For each cell type, cell number was directly linear with MPI signal
produced (R2 > 0.96). e. [top] MPI of 250k NK-92 cells, T cells, and macrophages for
visual comparison. [bottom] MPI of the lowest detected number NK-92 cells (31k), T
cells (31k), and macrophages (8k).
ng
.
ed
92
so
as
nd
on
for
al
for
T
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
NK-92 cell activity
It is essential to assay cell viability and function to ensure that VivoTrax labeling
does not hinder NK-92 cell activity. Analysis by trypan blue assay indicated NK-92 cell
viability was 93.1% after 24h co-incubation with 50 µg Fe/mL VivoTrax and 91.2% at
concentration 200 µg Fe/mL (average of n = 3 technical replicates). Assessment of cell
function is demonstrated in Figure 2 . Cytolysis assay shows there were no significant
differences in unlabeled vs. VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cytolysis against DAOY
medulloblastoma cells, LM7 osteosarcoma cells, or OS17 osteosarcoma cells at various
ratios (n.s., p > .05) (Fig 2a). MTS viability assay shows no significant differences in the
proliferative capacity of Jurkat T cells, and mouse macrophages following 24-hour co-
incubation with VivoTrax concentrations used for cell labeling (0-200 µg Fe/mL). A
minimum of 80% proliferation is retained for cells incubated with VivoTrax compared to
unlabeled cells.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 2: (a) NK-92 cytolysis assay with (i) DAOY-ffluc cells, (ii) LM7-GFP , and (iii)
OS17-GFP cells. Unlabeled or VivoTrax-labeled NK- 92 cells (effector) were added to
target cells at effector:target ratios 2.5:1, 5:1, 10:1. Luciferase or GFP activity in
surviving target cells was determined after 4 h of incubation. Data presented as mean
with standard deviation. (c) MTS assay for Jurkat T cells and raw264.7 macrophages
after 24 h co-incubation with VivoTrax particles at 0 – 400 µg Fe/mL . Data presented as
mean with standard deviation from 3 technical replicates.
iii)
to
in
an
es
as
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Preclinical MPI of mouse organs
MPI of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells administered to excised brains, legs, and
lungs to mimic treatments for medulloblastoma, osteosarcoma, and lung metastases,
are shown in Figures 3-5. For excised brains, no observable MPI signal was produced
by control brains that received unlabeled cells (Fig. 3a). MPI signal is observed from the
injection site for brains with 0.5 x 10 6 or 1 x 10 6 VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells, on the
right side of the cerebellum ( Fig. 3b,c ). The integrated MPI signal from brains that
received 1 x 10 6 cells was ~2.6x higher than 0.5 x 10 6 cells, on average (n = 2) ( Fig.
3d). 3D images show precise localization of 1x10 6 NK-92 cells in the brain in axal,
sagittal, and coronal views ( Fig. 3f-h). The injection site localized by MPI was 1.6 mm
right of midline (looking from hindbrain to forebrain), 1.2 mm caudal from lambda, and
3.1 mm down from cerebellar surface. Therefore, the injection site matched within 0.1-
0.6 mm from the expected stereotactic injection site.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 3. MPI detection, quantification, and localization of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells implanted to mouse brain. A) No MPI signal was detected from brains injected
with unlabeled cells (n = 4). MPI signal wa s detected on the right side of mouse brains
with implanted VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells at a cell number of b) 0.5 x 106 cells (n = 2)
and c) 1x106 cells (n = 2). Scale bars are 2 cm in length. D) Quantification of 2D images
show increasing amount of MPI signal produced by unlabeled, 0.5x10 6, and 1x10 6
labeled NK-92 cells. Plots show mean with individual data points. E) Photograph of
brain with fiducials for 3D imaging, with yellow arrow indicating the injection site. Three
fiducials were included in the MPI field of view for localization; F1 placed at the left ,
rostral, ventral surface, F2 placed at the caudal, dorsal surface, and F- at lambda on
the right side. 3D MPI of brain with 1x106 VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells in the f) axial, g)
sagittal, and h) coronal views. The injection site is indicated by red crosshairs. MIP =
maximum intensity projection.
92
ed
ns
)
es
6
of
ee
,
on
)
=
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
MPI signal from 2D projections is detected from the mid-tibia for legs with
implanted VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells (Fig. 4b,c , n = 3), whereas control legs with
unlabeled NK-92 cells show no observable signal above background noise (Fig. 4a, n =
6). Quantified MPI signal from 1x10 6 NK-92 cells in tibia is 2.4x higher than 0.5x10 6
cells, on average (** p < .001) (Fig. 4d). MPI signal from 0.5x106 cells implanted in tibia
is approximately 37x higher than background signals from unlabeled NK-92 cells (* p <
.05). For 3D MPI, fiducials were aligned with the ankle and knee joints, and the medial
surface of the leg for anatomical reference ( Fig. 4e ). Two focal MPI signals were
identified in the tibia ( Fig. 4f,g). The first signal was located at the target site; 8.6 mm
caudal from knee joint (11.6 mm cranial from ankle joint), 2.4 mm lateral from the medial
surface of the leg, and 5.0 mm dorsal of the ventral surface of the leg (marked in red).
The second focal MPI signal was attributed to labeled cells that were implanted along
the needle track, with maximum signal located at 5.2 mm caudal from knee joint (15.1
mm cranial from ankle joint), 1.9 mm lateral from the medial surface of the leg, and 2.5
mm dorsal of the ventral surface of the leg (marked in yellow). These focal regions are
more prominently resolved in 3D compared to 2D (Fig. 4h).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 4. MPI detection, quantification, and localization of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells implanted to mouse left tibias. A) No MPI signal was detected from tibias that
received unlabeled NK-92 cells (n = 6). MPI signal was detected from tibias with
implanted VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells at a cell number of b) 0.5 x 106 cells (n = 3) and
c) 1.0x106 cells (n = 3). Scale bars are 2 cm in length. D) Quantification of 2D images
shows significant differences in the amount of MPI signal from unlabeled, 0.5x10 6
labeled and 1.0x10 6 labeled NK-92 cells (* p < .05, ** p < .01, **** p < 0.0001). Plots
show mean standard deviation wi th individual data points. E) Photograph of mouse
tibia in MPI sample holder with 1x10 6 implanted VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells. Three
fiducials are placed for anatomical reference of the ankle joint (F1), knee joint (F2) and
medial surface of leg (F3). Maximum intensity projections of 3D MPI in f) coronal and g)
sagittal views identify 2 foca l MPI signals in the tibia, marked by yellow and red
crosshairs. H) Overlay of 2D MPI with photograph shows alignment of MPI signal with
mouse leg.
92
at
ith
nd
es
6
ts
se
ee
nd
g)
ed
ith
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
MPI signal was present in the left lungs that received VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells and no MPI signal was present in the right lungs that received unlabeled NK-92
cells (Fig. 5 a-c ). Quantified MPI signal from 1x10 6 NK-92 cells in lung tissue is 2.8x
higher than 0.5x10 6 cells, on average (** p < .001) ( Fig. 5d). MPI signal from 0.5x10 6
cells implanted in lungs is approximately 22x higher than background signals from
unlabeled NK-92 cells (* p < .05). Two sets of lungs, one with 0.5x10
6 NK-92 cells (Fig.
5f) and the other with 1.0x10 6 NK-92 cells ( Fig. 5g ), were imaged by 3D MPI
surrounded by 3 fiducial markers placed on the base of the sample holder. Using the
fiducials as position markers and photograph for anatomical reference, the location of
MPI signal was determined for each lung. In Fig 6f , the MPI signal from labeled NK-92
cells in the left lung is 3.4 mm cranial from the caudal edge of the lung, 3.5 mm right of
the left surface of the lung, and 1.0 mm deep from the anterior surface (base of sample
holder). In Fig 6g, the MPI signal from labeled NK-92 cells in the left lung is 6.8 mm
cranial from the caudal edge of the left lung, 2.0 mm right of the left surface of the lung,
1.3 mm deep from the anterior surface.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 5. MPI detection, quantification, and localization of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92
cells implanted to mouse lungs. A) No MPI signal was detected from right lungs that
received unlabeled NK-92 cells (n = 8). MPI signal was detected from left lungs with
implanted VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells at a cell number of b) 0.5 x 106 cells (n = 4) and
c) 1.0x106 cells (n = 4). Scale bars are 2 cm in length. Plots show mean standard
deviation with individual data points. D) Quantification of 2D images show significant
differences in the amount of MPI signal produced by unlabeled, 0.5x10 6 labeled and
1.0x106 labeled NK-92 cells (* p < .05, ** p < .01, **** p < 0.0001). e) Photograph of
mouse lungs in MPI sample holder. Blue lines mark the left and caudal surface of the
lungs. Coronal section from 3D MPI of f) 0.5 x 10 6 NK-92 cells and g) 1.0 x 10 6 NK-92
cells. Red targets mark the location of maximum MPI signal from NK-92 cell
implantation.
92
at
ith
nd
rd
nt
nd
of
he
92
ell
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Clinical-scale MPI studies with NK-92 cells
We demonstrate detection of 40 million VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells using
human MPI scanner (Figure 6a), producing an image with dimensions 20 x 20 x 3 cm
and peak SNR = 110 (axial slice shown, Figure 6b ). Using the small detection coil
(Figure 6c ), MPI of 1 million VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells (3.17 pg Fe/cell) was
demonstrated (Figure 6c,d). Quantified MPI signal was similar for VivoTrax-labeled NK-
92 cells and T cells of the same number, as was seen on the preclinical MOMENTUM
MPI scanner (Figure 1d). MPI signal from cell pellets was directly linear with number of
VivoTrax-labeled T cells and macrophages (R2 = 0.99) (Figure 6e). The lowest number
of cells detected on clinical-scale MPI using the small detection coil was 1.7x10 4
macrophages (10.34 pg Fe/cell) and 6.6x104 T cells (2.03 pg Fe/cell).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 6. Clinical-scale MPI detection of VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cells. (a) A
VivoTrax-labeled NK-92 cell pellet with relevant clinical dose (4 x 10 7 cells) was placed
in the human MPI scanner (ID = 25 cm) and a 3D MPI image was acquired. ( b) A 20 cm
x 20 cm axial slice of the image is shown. (c) Cell pellets of labeled NK-92 cells, T cells,
and macrophages ranging from 1.7 x 103 cells – 1 x 106 cells were imaged using a small
detection coil with ID = 2 cm. (d) A 3D image was acquired of 1 x 10 6 NK-92 cells ,
shown is a 20 cm x 20 cm axial slice. (e) The cellular limit of detection was established
at 1.7 x 10 3 macrophages or 6.6 x 10 3 T cells. NK-92 cells (1 x 10 6) produced similar
signal as T cells of the same number.
A
ed
m
ls,
all
,
ed
lar
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
Results
Program. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American
Cancer Society, 115(7), pp.1531-1543.
3. Moreno, F., Cacciavillano, W., Cipolla, M., Coirini, M., Streitenberger, P., López
Martí, J., Palladino, M., Morici, M., Onoratelli, M., Drago, G. and Schifino, A., 2017.
Childhood osteosarcoma: Incidence and survival in Argentina. Report from the
national pediatric cancer registry, ROHA network 2000–2013. Pediatric blood &
cancer, 64(10), p.e26533.
4. Gok Durnali, A., Paksoy Turkoz, F., Ardic Yukruk, F., Tokluoglu, S., Yazici, O.K.,
Demirci, A., Bal, O., Gundogdu Buyukbas, S., Esbah, O., Oksuzoglu, B. and Alkis,
N., 2016. Outcomes of adolescent and adult patients with lung metastatic
osteosarcoma and comparison of synchronous and metachronous lung metastatic
groups. PLoS One, 11(5), p.e0152621.
5. Epperly, R., Gottschalk, S. and Velasquez, M.P ., 2020. Harnessing T cells to target
pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: CARs, BiTEs, and beyond. Children, 7(2), p.14
6. Chang, T.C., Carter, R.A., Li, Y., Li, Y., Wang, H., Edmonson, M.N., Chen, X., Arnold,
P., Geiger, T.L., Wu, G. and Peng, J., 2017. The neoepitope landscape in pediatric
cancers. Genome medicine, 9, pp.1-12.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
7. Thomas, B.C., Staudt, D.E., Douglas, A.M., Monje, M., Vitanza, N.A. and Dun, M.D.,
2023. CAR T cell therapies for diffuse midline glioma. Trends in cancer.
8. DeRenzo, C., Krenciute, G. and Gottschalk, S., 2018. The landscape of CAR T cells
beyond acute lymphoblastic leukemia for pediatric solid tumors. American Society of
Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 38, pp.830-837.
9. Zhang, J. and Wang, T., 2021. Immune cell landscape and immunotherapy of
medulloblastoma. Pediatric Investigation, 5(04), pp.299-309.
10. Shimasaki, N., Jain, A. and Campana, D., 2020. NK cells for cancer
immunotherapy. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 19(3), pp.200-218.
11. Liu S, Galat V, Galat4 Y, Lee YKA, Wainwright D, Wu J. NK cell-based cancer
immunotherapy: from basic biology to clinical development. J Hematol Oncol.
2021;14: 7.
12. Myers JA, Miller JS. Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nat
Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(2):85-100.
13. Toffoli EC, Sheikhi A, Höppner YD, de Kok P , Yazdanpanah-Samani M, Spanholtz J,
Verheul HMW, van der Vliet HJ, de Gruijl TD. Natural Killer Cells and Anti-Cancer
Therapies: Reciprocal Effects on Immune Function and Therapeutic Response.
Cancers (Basel). 2021;13: 711.
14. Cheng M, Chen Y, Xiao W, Sun R, Tian Z. NK cell-based immunotherapy for
malignant diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2013;10: 230–252.
15. Shimasaki N, Jain A, Campana D. NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug
Discov. 2020;19: 200–218.
16. Valipour B, Velaei K, Abedelahi A, Karimipour M, Darabi M, Charoudeh HN. NK cells:
An attractive candidate for cancer therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(11):19352-65.
17. Tarek, N. and Lee, D.A., 2014. Natu ral killer cells for osteosarcoma. Current
Advances in Osteosarcoma, pp.341-353.
18. Buddingh, E.P ., Schilham, M.W., Ruslan, S.E.N., Berghuis, D., Szuhai, K.,
Suurmond, J., Taminiau, A.H., Gelderblom, H., Egeler, R.M., Serra, M. and
Hogendoorn, P.C., 2011. Chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma is highly
susceptible to IL-15-activated allogeneic and autologous NK cells. Cancer
immunology, immunotherapy, 60, pp.575-586.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
19. Laskowski, T.J., Biederstädt, A. and Rezvani, K., 2022. Natural killer cells in
antitumour adoptive cell immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Cancer , 22(10), pp.557-
575.
20. Denman CJ, Senyukov V V., Somanchi SS, Phatarpekar P V., Kopp LM, Johnson JL,
Singh H, Hurton L, Maiti SN, Huls MH, Champlin RE, Cooper LJN, Lee DA.
Membrane-Bound IL-21 Promotes Sustained Ex Vivo Proliferation of Human Natural
Killer Cells. PLoS One. 2012;7: e30264.
21. Khatua S, Cooper LJN, Sandberg DI, Ketonen L, Johnson JM, Rytting ME, Liu DD,
Meador H, Trikha P, Nakkula RJ, Behbehani GK, Ragoonanan D, Gupta S,
Kotrotsou A, Idris T, Shpall EJ, Rezvani K, Colen R, Zaky W, Lee DA,
Gopalakrishnan V. Phase I study of intraventricular infusions of autologous ex vivo
expanded NK cells in children with recurrent medulloblastoma and ependymoma.
Neuro Oncol. 2020;22: 1214–1225.
22. Chawla, S., Shehu, V., Gupta, P .K., Nath, K. and Poptani, H., 2021. Physiological
imaging methods for evaluating response to immunotherapies in
glioblastomas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(8), p.3867
23. Bulte, J. W., & Daldrup-Link, H. E. (2018). Clinical tracking of cell transfer and cell
transplantation: trials and tribulations. Radiology, 289(3), 604-615.
24. Malosio ML, Esposito A, Brigatti C, et al. (2015). MR imaging monitoring of iron-
labeled pancreatic islets in a small series of patients: islet fate in successful, un-
successful, and autotransplantation. Cell Transplant 24(11):2285–2296.
25. Ahrens ET, Flores R, Xu H, Morel PA. In vivo imaging platform for tracking
immunotherapeutic cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23: 983–987.
26. Ahrens ET, Bulte JWM. Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance
imaging. Nature Reviews Immunology 2013 13:10. 2013;13: 755–763.
27. Kennis, B.A., Michel, K.A., Brugmann, W.B., Laureano, A., Tao, R.H., Somanchi,
S.S., Einstein, S.A., Bravo-Alegria, J.B., Maegawa, S., Wahba, A. and Kiany, S.,
2019. Monitoring of intracerebellarly-administered natural killer cells with fluorine-19
MRI. Journal of neuro-oncology, 142, pp.395-407.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
28. Bouchlaka, Myriam N., Kai D. Ludwig, Jeremy W. Gordon, Matthew P. Kutz, Bryan
P. Bednarz, Sean B. Fain, and Christian M. Capitini. "19F-MRI for monitoring human
NK cells in vivo." Oncoimmunology 5, no. 5 (2016): e1143996.
29. Ahrens, Eric T., Brooke M. Helfer, Charles F. O'Hanlon, and Claudiu Schirda.
"Clinical cell therapy imaging using a perfluorocarbon tracer and fluorine ‐ 19 MRI."
Magnetic resonance in medicine 72, no. 6 (2014): 1696-1701.
30. Jacob, Jacinta, Alessia Volpe, Qi Peng, Robert I. Lechler, Lesley A. Smyth,
Giovanna Lombardi, and Gilbert O. Fruhwir th. "Radiolabelling of Polyclonally
Expanded Human Regulatory T Cells (Treg) with 89Zr-oxine for Medium-Term In
Vivo Cell Tracking." Molecules 28, no. 3 (2023): 1482.
31. Zheng et al. Quantitative MPI monitors the transplantation, biodistribution, and
clearance of stem cells in vivo. Theranostics, 2016. 6(3):291-301.
32. Wang, Q., Ma, X., Liao, H., Liang, Z., Li, F., Tian, J., & Ling, D. (2020). Artificially
Engineered Cubic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle as a High-Performance Magnetic Particle
Imaging Tracer for Stem Cell Tracking. ACS nano, 14(2), 2053-2062.
33. Fink, Corby, Julia J. Gevaert, John W. Barrett, Jimmy D. Dikeakos, Paula J. Foster,
and Gregory A. Dekaban. "In vivo tracking of adenoviral-transduced iron oxide-
labeled bone marrow-derived dendritic cells using magnetic particle imaging." Eur
radio express (2023).
34. Bulte, Jeff WM, and Ali Shakeri-Zadeh. "In vivo MRI tracking of tumor vaccination
and antigen presentation by dendritic cells." Molecular Imaging and Biology (2022):
1-10.
35. Makela, A. V., Schott, M. A., Sehl, O. C., Gevaert, J. J., Foster, P. J., & Contag, C.
H. (2022). Tracking the fates of iron-labeled tumor cells in vivo using Magnetic
Particle Imaging. Nanoscale Advances, 4(17), 3617-3623.
36. Wu, Lyndia C., Yanrong Zhang, Gary Steinberg, H. Qu, S. Huang, M. Cheng, T. Bliss
et al. "A review of magnetic particle imaging and perspectives on
neuroimaging." American Journal of Neuroradiology 40, no. 2 (2019): 206-212.
37. Rivera-Rodriguez, Angelie, Lan B. Hoang-Minh, Andreina Chiu-Lam, Nicole Sarna,
Leyda Marrero-Morales, Duane A. Mitchell, and Carlos M. Rinaldi-Ramos. "Tracking
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
adoptive T cell immunotherapy using magnetic particle imaging." Nanotheranostics
5, no. 4 (2021): 431.
38. Wu, Wei Emma, Edwin Chang, Linchun Jin, Shiqin Liu, Ching-Hsin Huang, Rozy
Kamal, Tie Liang et al. "Multimodal In Vivo Tracking of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T
Cells in Preclinical Glioblastoma Models." Investigative Radiology 58, no. 6 (2023):
388-395.
39. Mattingly, E., Mason, E., Sliwiak, M. and Wald, L.L., 2022. Drive and receive coil
design for a human-scale MPI system. International Journal on Magnetic Particle
Imaging IJMPI, 8(1 Suppl 1).
40. Gräser, M., Thieben, F., Szwargulski, P., Werner, F., Gdaniec, N., Boberg, M.,
Griese, F., Möddel, M., Ludewig, P., Van De Ven, D. and Weber, O.M., 2019.
Human-sized magnetic particle imaging for brain applications. Nature
communications, 10(1), p.1936.
41. Vogel, P ., Rückert, M., Greiner, C., Günther, J., Reichl, T., Kampf, T., Bley, T., Behr,
V. and Herz, S., 2022. iMPI–portable human-sized Magnetic Particle Imaging
Scanner for real-time endovascular Interventions.
42. Le, T.A., Bui, M.P ., Gadelmowla, K.M., Oh, S. and Yoon, J., 2023. First Human-scale
Magnetic Particle Imaging System with Superconductor. International Journal on
Magnetic Particle Imaging IJMPI, 9(1 Suppl 1).
43. Mason EE, Barcikowski E, Carl J, Chandeeing M, Davidson B, Fellows B, Fetsch W,
Fields K, Greve J, Konkle JJ, Mattingly E, Sanders T, Sehl OC, Trease D, Truxal A,
Weyhmiller M, Goodwill P. Preliminary Results: Large Bore Clinical MPI System
Imaging Human Head-sized FOVs. International Journal on Magnetic Particle
Imaging (2024).
44. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Nanotechnologies – In vitro
MTS assay for measuring the cytotoxic effect of nanoparticles (ISO Standard No.
19007:2018).
45. Sehl, O.C., Tiret, B., Berih, M.A., Makela, A.V., Goodwill, P.W. and Foster, P.J., 2022.
MPI region of interest (ROI) analysis and quantification of iron in different
volumes. International Journal on Magnetic Particle Imaging, 8(1).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
46. Helfer, B.M., Ponomarev, V., Patrick, P .S., Blower, P .J., Feitel, A., Fruhwirth, G.O.,
Jackman, S., Mouries, L.P., Park, M.V., Srinivas, M. and Stuckey, D.J., 2021.
Options for imaging cellular therapeutics in vivo: a multi-stakeholder
perspective. Cytotherapy, 23(9)
47. Guma, S.R., Lee, D.A., Ling, Y ., Gordon, N. and Kleinerman, E.S., 2014. Aerosol
interleukin‐ 2 induces natural killer cell proliferation in the lung and combination
therapy improves the survival of mice with osteosarcoma lung metastasis. Pediatric
blood & cancer, 61(8), pp.1362-1368.
48. Nersesian, S., Schwartz, S.L., Grantham, S.R., MacLean, L.K., Lee, S.N., Pugh-
Toole, M. and Boudreau, J.E., 2021. NK cell infiltration is associated with improved
overall survival in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. Translational oncology, 14(1), p.100930.
49. Nayyar, G., Chu, Y. and Cairo, M.S., 2019. Overcoming resistance to natural killer
cell based immunotherapies for solid tumors. Frontiers in oncology, 9, p.51.
50. Lechermann, Laura M., Doreen Lau, Bala Attili, Luigi Aloj, and Ferdia A. Gallagher.
"In vivo cell tracking using PET: Opportunities and challenges for clinical translation
in oncology." Cancers 13, no. 16 (2021): 4042.
51. De Vries, I.J.M., Lesterhuis, W.J., Barentsz, J.O., Verdijk, P ., Van Krieken, J.H.,
Boerman, O.C., Oyen, W.J., Bonenkamp, J.J., Boezeman, J.B., Adema, G.J. and
Bulte, J.W., 2005. Magnetic resonance tracking of dendritic cells in melanoma
patients for monitoring of cellular therapy. Nature biotechnology , 23(11), pp.1407-
1413.
52. Lapi, S., McConathy, J., Jeffers, C., Bartels, J., Houson, H., White, S. and Younger,
J., 2022. First-in-Human Imaging of 89Zr-oxine Labelled Autologous Leukocytes in
Healthy Volunteers.
53. McAfee, J.G.; Samin, A. In-111 labeled leukocytes: A review of problems in image
interpretation. Radiology 1985, 155, 221–229.
54. Shapiro, E.M., Sharer, K., Skrtic, S. and Koretsky, A.P., 2006. In vivo detection of
single cells by MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 55(2), pp.242-249.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.583881doi: bioRxiv preprint
55. Janowski, M., Walczak, P ., Kropiwnicki, T., Jurkiewicz, E., Domanska-Janik, K.,
Bulte, J.W., Lukomska, B. and Roszkowski, M., 2014. Long-term MRI cell tracking
after intraventricular delivery in a patient with global cerebral ischemia and prospects
for magnetic navigation of stem cells within the CSF. PloS one, 9(6), p.e97631.
56. Iv, M., Samghabadi, P ., Holdsworth, S., Gentles, A., Rezaii, P., Harsh, G., Li, G.,
Thomas, R., Moseley, M., Daldrup-Link, H.E. and Vogel, H., 2019. Quantification of
macrophages in high-grade gliomas by using ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI: a pilot
study. Radiology, 290(1), pp.198-206.
57. Sato, N., Stringaris, K., Davidson-Moncada, J.K., Reger, R., Adler, S.S., Dunbar, C.,
Choyke, P.L. and Childs, R.W., 2020. In vivo tracking of adoptively transferred
natural killer cells in rhesus macaques using 89Zirconium-oxine cell labeling and
PET imaging. Clinical Cancer Research, 26(11), pp.2573-2581.
58. Santos, António JM, and Emmanuel Boucrot. "Probing endocytosis during the cell
cycle with minimal experimental perturbation." Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis: