Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks

Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks Philipp Waschk, Philipp Spiegel, Arthur Gessler, Matthias Sauer, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Fungal symbionts play essential roles in ecosystems influencing plant development and biodiversity. Mycorrhizal fungi can form common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) where a fungus connects the roots of at least two plants via continuous extraradical mycelium and transfers resources such as nitrogen and carbon. In addition to mycorrhizal fungi, there is another group of fungal mutualists known as endophytes. They also support plant development and may form common endophyte networks (CENs). Whether endophytes can transfer soil resources like nitrogen, carbon, and water through such networks remains an open question. To test this, we established a CEN experiment in split petri dishes involving Arabidopsis thaliana hosts and three phylogenetically diverse endophytes ( Trichoderma viride , Mucor hiemalis , and Fusarium temperatum ) to test whether transfer of isotopically labelled amino acid 15 nitrogen (N), amino acid 13 carbon, 15 N-ammonium, or deuterated water can be transferred by donor to receiver plants connected via CENs. We show that the tested endophytes can form CENs and transfer growth limiting resources from donor plant soil to receiver plant tissues. F. temperatum boosted plant growth by 38% relative to the uninoculated control, and it enriched plant 15 N content derived from amino acids by 55%. Surprisingly, we also observed amino acid-derived 13 carbon transport from donor plant soil to receiver plant tissues by T. viride (+ 2.83% > control). We also demonstrate that soil resource transfer by all three endophytes shifted in the presence of two versus a single host plant even when root systems were physically separated to avoid competition, underscoring that endophytic functioning, not just that of plants, also shifts when CENs are formed. Our results demonstrate that non-mycorrhizal fungi, like endophytes, can form networks similar to the idea of CMNs and transfer plant growth relevant resources. Endophytes display a broad array of symbiotic functions with their hosts, and formation of CENs may be a newly discovered component of their symbiotic tool kit. Biological sciences/Ecology Earth and environmental sciences/Ecology Biological sciences/Microbiology Biological sciences/Plant sciences fungi Trichoderma common mycorrhizal networks Fusarium Mucor common fungal networks Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Introduction Cross-kingdom interactions with fungi strongly influence plant development and biodiversity [ 1 ]. Fungal symbionts are particularly important, with mycorrhizal fungi receiving the most attention because they form tight associations with plant roots and confer nutritional and pathogen resistance benefits [ 2 ], [ 3 ], [ 4 ]. Some mycorrhizal fungi form so-called ‘common mycorrhizal networks’ (CMNs) characterized by a mycorrhizal fungus connecting the roots of two or more plants via continuous extraradical mycelium [ 5 ], [ 6 ]. CMNs can connect the roots of different plants [ 7 ] and have been implicated in transporting water, nitrogen, and carbon [ 8 ], [ 9 ], [ 10 ]. While mycorrhizal fungi have received most attention for forming these cross-plant networks, there is another, separate group of plant-associated fungi known as endophytes. Endophytes may play similarly important roles in improving plant growth, increasing nutrient supply, and potentially even forming continuous mycelia networks to interconnect plants [ 11 ], [ 12 ], [ 13 ], [ 14 ], [ 15 ]. In this study, we define endophytes sensu Liao et al., (2025) as asymptomatic microbial partners that co-inhabit healthy internal plant tissues with the ability to confer benefits. Endophytes can be found in nearly all living plants in natural ecosystems. Root inhabiting endophytes can improve host plant growth and nutrient uptake [ 17 ]. Despite their ubiquity and contributions to plant development, this group stands out as particularly understudied in ecological analyses, especially when colonizing non-grass hosts and on plant root systems where the capacity to form networks in the soil is possible [ 11 ], [ 12 ], [ 18 ], [ 19 ], [ 20 ]. Recently, evidence that endophytes can form CMN-like networks was first demonstrated. An endophytic Alternaria was shown to mediate transfer of a water-soluble dye injected into “donor plant” leaves into receiver plants [ 21 ]. This study establishes that “CENs” (common endophyte networks) can be formed among co-occurring grasses, and it raises the possibility that endophytes may more broadly engage in this type of mycelium establishment to transport soil resources that plants need for growth, such as nitrogen, water, and possibly even carbon [ 15 ]. To address this, we investigated whether CENs established by a range of endophytic species facilitate the exchange of nitrogen (ammonium, amino acids), carbon (amino acids), and water between plants colonized by the same fungal individual. Soil-derived water, nitrogen, and to a much lesser extent, photosynthetic-derived carbon are expected to be transported via CMNs (Simard et al., 2015), and thus we focused on soil resource versus photosynthetic carbon transfer. Like most studies tracking soil nutrient exchange via CMNs, this involves measuring resource transfer of isotopically labelled substrates from a “donor” compartment soil into a receiver plant with or without a contiguous fungal network. This should be conceptualized as comparing resource transfer from donor soil ◊ fungus connecting both plants ◊ receiver plant versus from the donor plant ◊ fungus connecting both plants ◊ receiver plant. We also included a no receiver plant treatment which enabled us to test how fungal nutrient transfer from donor soil ◊ receiver soil shifts in the presence versus absence of a CEN, allowing us to also test changes in fungal functioning (Fig. 1 ). Typically, the functioning of fungi is not considered in CMN research where the focus is disproportionately on plants. As a host plant, we used Arabidopsis thaliana and three different endophytic fungal species: Fusarium temperatum , Mucor hiemalis , and Trichoderma viride . We selected A. thaliana due to its fast growth, because it is colonized by a large range of endophytic fungi, and because it is a model plant for non-mycorrhizal symbioses [ 18 ], [ 23 ], [ 24 ], [ 25 ], [ 26 ]. We selected the endophyte species because of their fast growth rates, broad phylogenetic range, and because of their ecological roles ranging from pathogenicity to mutualism. We hypothesize that all three endophytes facilitate resource transfer from the donor compartment to receiver side plant but that each species will provide different resources, with T. viride providing the most transfer given its well-described, positive effects on plant development [ 27 ]. Results I. Validation of the experimental system To test whether factors apart from the inoculation with endophytes affected receiver plant physiological and isotopic signatures, we conducted tests to critically evaluate the experimental design. First, we confirmed that isotopically labelled nitrogen did not increase total plant nitrogen nor total soil nitrogen content on the receiver side (Suppl. Figure 3a-b), confirming that isotope additions did not have a fertilization effect on the receiver side. Growth of the donor and receiver plant on the same plate were not correlated and were thus considered independent (Suppl. Figure 3c). This is expected unless there were plate-level effects that coupled their growth because the plants were not uniform in size prior to out-planting into the plates. Donor and receiver plants also showed similarly high fungal root colonization (Suppl. Figure 5), demonstrating that both plants were simultaneously highly colonized. Concurrent root colonization alongside visual fungal in-growth into both the donor and receiver side soils from the fungal compartment (Suppl. Figure 2) are signatures of hyphal continuity in the study system. For all subsequent analyses, we only looked at receiver plants to address receiver plant functioning and transfer. There may be non-biological isotope transport via airborne substances or water flow that crossed the dividing barriers to the receiver plant. To test for this, we compared the isotope addition control without fungi (Fig. 1 ; -E/+I/+R) to the natural abundance control ((Fig. 1 ; -E/-I/+R; see methods). There were no differences between the natural abundance and isotope controls for 15 N and 13 C for any of the measured parameters, confirming that there was no alternative transport mechanism for carbon and nitrogen onto the receiver side in our experimental set-up (Suppl. Figure 4a-b). However, for the added D 2 O, we observed elevated deuterium levels in the receiver plants of the isotope controls compared to the natural abundance control ( p = 0.0007, Suppl. Table 1). Surprisingly, this same pattern was not observed in the receiver soil. Therefore, an alternative transport of deuterated water to the plant but not the soil, like transport by evaporation and subsequent condensation, was present in our experimental set-up (Suppl. Figure 4c). Hereafter, only the natural abundance control was used to compare to the inoculation treatment levels (hereafter referred to as “control”) unless stated otherwise (e.g., in the D 2 O plant treatment where we also included the isotope control due to the effect mentioned above). Finally, we included plates with no receiver plants (Fig. 1 ; +E/+I/-R) and analyzed their receiver soil for isotopic signatures to account for the possibility that the endophytes transported isotopes to the receiver compartment independent of a receiver plant being present, and thus to account for the deposit of isotope-containing compounds through fungal necromass and exudates. We only tested this using 13 C-labelled amino acids, 15 N-labelled ammonium and D 2 O. When the added isotopic compound on the donor side was 13 C-labelled amino acids, inoculation with M. hiemalis increased 13 C levels of the receiver soils compared to the controls with no fungus but a receiver plant suggesting immobilization of carbon from the donor side into fungal biomass on the receiver side ( p = 0.05, Fig. 2 a). 15 N levels were not significantly different to the control without an inoculated fungus but with a receiver plant present when the added isotopic compound on the donor side was 15 N-labelled ammonium (Fig. 2 b). There was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on deuterium levels of the receiver soils ( p = 0.049, Suppl. Table 2). Inoculation with T. viride ( p = 0.04) increased deuterium levels of the receiver soils of the plates without a receiver plant compared to controls without fungi but including a receiver plant suggesting immobilization of water or deuterium-containing compounds from the donor side into fungal biomass on the receiver side (Fig. 2 c). Inoculations with F. temperatum and M. hiemalis did not show any significant changes in deuterium signatures. II. Effects of endophyte inoculation on plant growth and nutrient content Physiological analyses of receiver plants were conducted to assess whether inoculation with endophytes affected plant growth and health. Inoculation with F. temperatum increased plant biomass in this experimental setup ( p = 0.01) and inoculation with T. viride marginally increased plant biomass ( p = 0.07, Fig. 3 a). Further, fungal root colonization of the receiver plants did not vary across the three endophyte inoculation treatments, meaning that differences in isotopic signatures across fungal species cannot be tracked back to different degrees of root colonization (Suppl. Figure 5). Further, fungal root colonization of the receiver plants was positively correlated with plant growth ( p = 0.01, r = 0.51, Fig. 3 b). This suggests that a higher degree of root colonization by fungi boosts plant growth, an expected outcome for mutualistic, endophytic fungi. Root colonization of receiver plants was not correlated with plant growth in the control treatments (-E) suggesting that plant growth stimulation was conferred by the inoculated endophytes and not by fungi that were potentially carried over from the unsterile soil from before outplanting (Suppl. Figure 3d). Further, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on the total plant nitrogen content of the receiver plants ( p = 0.001). Inoculation with M. hiemalis , but not with T. viride nor F. temperatum , increased plant nitrogen content in the receiver plants compared to the controls (p = 0.001, Fig. 3 c). III. Evidence for resource transfer from donor to receiver via endophytes When 13 C-labelled amino acids were added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on 13 C-levels of receiver plants ( p = 0.05). Inoculation with T. viride increased receiver plant 13 C-derived from labelled amino acids ( p = 0.049), but not in the receiver soils compared to the control (Fig. 4 a-b). Importantly, inoculation with T. viride also did not increase 13 C-levels in receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant compared to controls with a receiver plant (Fig. 2 a). This demonstrates that T. viride facilitated direct carbon transport from the donor side to the receiver plant and that the transfer was contingent upon the presence of a receiver plant. In contrast, neither inoculation with M. hiemalis nor with F. temperatum had an effect on the 13 C levels of receiver plants nor soils compared to the control (Fig. 4 a,b). When 15 N-labelled amino acids were added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on 15 N-levels of receiver soils ( p = 0.01). Inoculation with F. temperatum also increased 15 N levels of receiver plants by 55% compared to the control ( p = 0.017; Fig. 4 e). F. temperatum also elevated 15 N levels in soil ( p = 0.001; Fig. 4 f). As a result, we cannot elucidate whether observed 15 N in plants was provided indirectly via root uptake from fungal exudated 15 N bearing compounds into receiver plant soil and/or directly via continuous hyphal transport from the donor side. Inoculation with M. hiemalis increased 15 N levels in receiver soils ( p = 0.007) but not plants (Fig. 4 e,f). M. hiemalis also transferred less 15 N than F. temperatum. Inoculation with T. viride did not significantly change 15 N-levels in plant or soil. We did not assess amino acid-derived 15 N transfer to receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant to test for fungal mediated N transfer independent of a receiver plant but based on the 13 C-labelled amino acids and 15 N-ammonium treatment (see above), we infer that transfer of amino acid-derived 15 N to the receiver soil also required a receiver plant, providing support to the idea that amino acid-derived resource transfer to receiver side occurs via continuous fungal networks between two plants. When 15 N-labelled ammonium was added to the donor side, we did not find 15 N transfer to the receiver soil or plant for any endophyte species. When D 2 O was added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on the deuterium levels of the receiver plants ( p = 0.02) and receiver soils ( p = 0.0001). We assume that the short time frame between D 2 O addition and sampling would not allow for significant exchange of deuterium and organic matter and transport of these D-enriched compounds, so that the detected changes in δD represent actual relocation of D 2 O. Inoculation with F. temperatum ( p < 0.0001) and M. hiemalis ( p = 0.04) increased deuterium levels of receiver soils compared to the control (Fig. 4 h). Further, inoculations with F. temperatum and M. hiemalis did not affect deuterium levels in receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant compared to controls with a receiver plant (Fig. 2 c). This suggests a receiver plant-dependent water transport from donor to receiver soil via F. temperatum and M. hiemalis. Like the results of 15 N from amino acids, M. hiemalis transferred less deuterium than F. temperatum. T. viride only transferred water to the receiver soil in the absence of a receiver plant ( p = 0.04, Fig. 2 c). The isotope control of deuterium in plants was significantly higher than the corresponding natural abundance control ( p = 0.0007, Fig. 4 g, Suppl. Figure 4c). Compared to the natural abundance control, all fungal treatments showed different plant deuterium levels (p < 0.05). Compared to the isotope control, none of the fungal treatments showed different plant deuterium levels, suggesting that an alternative, non-fungal pathway like evaporation and subsequent condensation may also explain significant deuterium enrichment in plants inoculated with different fungi (Fig. 4 g). Discussion Transport of resources via endophytic fungal networks extends the established role of non-mycorrhizal fungi beyond affecting a single host plant towards simultaneously impacting interconnected plants. In this study, we observed transfer of amino acid-derived resources from donor plant soils into receiver plant tissues by endophytes. Further, we found different resource allocation patterns among the tested species, and that fungal functioning shifted when engaged in a CEN versus symbiosis with a singular plant. This suggests that endophytes may play a previously unknown role in transferring soil nutrients via CENs, and that endophyte identity influences which types and magnitude of resources get transferred. I. Evidence that the tested fungal species are mutualistic endophytes All three fungal species were beneficial endophytes (i.e., had beneficial effects on host plants) in our experimental system. Across all species, root colonization was positively correlated with plant growth, which would only be expected if the fungi were acting mutualistically. Though not affecting total plant biomass, M. hiemalis increased total plant nitrogen. It did not transfer any of the labelled compounds directly to the plant. It may therefore benefit plants by stimulating decomposition under receiver plants without forming CENs. T. viride also stimulated plant growth by 12%, but this effect was only marginally significant. F. temperatum significantly enhanced plant growth by 38% relative to the control. This result stands in contrast to it being previously described as a hemibiotrophic pathogen [ 28 ], [ 29 ], [ 30 ], but it is consistent with other research showing that Fusarium species can more broadly act endophytically by stimulating plant growth hormone production and resource uptake [ 26 ], [ 27 ], [ 31 ]. In this study we show that F. temperatum can act mutualistically during this plant ontogenetic stage, and that all three tested fungi confer positive impacts on plant development. II. Evidence for amino acid nitrogen and carbon transfer by CENs We identified endophyte-mediated transfer of amino acid nitrogen and carbon from donor soil compartments into receiver plants. Importantly, both receiver and donor plants were concurrently colonized by the same fungal genet. This was confirmed visually by the growing colony from the inoculation compartment extending into both soil compartments and at a finer scale using microscopy to confirm root colonization. This strongly suggests that there was hyphal continuity between the donor and the receiver plants in this study system, and that resource transfer occurred via a common endophyte network. F. temperatum transferred amino acid nitrogen from the donor compartment to receiver plants. 15 N enrichment in receiver plant tissues may have been derived from direct plant uptake of 15 N bearing compounds in the soil since soil 15 N levels were also elevated by inoculation. This 15 N would have come from fungal exudates or necromass. Transfer may also be direct via hyphal continuity from the donor to receiver side. While these two possibilities cannot be teased apart in our study, it is likely the 15 N in the receiver compartment soil is immobilized in fungal biomass since the study time frame was shorter than typical soil fungal turnover rates [ 32 ]. This would suggest that the transfer was direct from fungus to plant This interpretation is also supported by our results of other fungi that did not enrich plant 15 N levels. Inoculation with M. hiemalis elevated receiver soil 15 N but without detectable enrichment in receiver plants, suggesting that observed 15 N in the soil was immobilized in fungal tissues otherwise it would be expected to be readily taken up by the plant. Regardless of the mechanism, F. temperatum elevated plant 15 N level when connected to more than one plant, and it did not translocate amino acids nor ammonium into receiver compartment soils in the absence of a receiver plant, establishing the importance of having more than one interconnected plant for resource transfer. We also tracked T. viride transferred amino acid carbon from the donor compartment into receiver plants. Importantly, 13 C levels in the receiver soil were comparable to natural abundance levels, which suggests a direct transfer of carbon from the donor compartment into the receiver plant via a Trichoderma CEN. It is important to note that 13 C transfer from amino acids, while significantly higher than the control, was low (+ 2.83% higher than the natural abundance control), and thus, the ecological importance of CEN-based C transfer from amino acids may be minimal, similar to photosynthetic carbon transport via CMNs [ 22 ]. However, based on previous studies, and our own observations of enhanced development, T. viride promotes the growth of A. thaliana via elevated H+-ATPase activity [ 33 ], and even without direct contact via plant-growth promoting volatile organic compounds [ 34 ]. Our findings may be an additional mechanism among the many by which Trichoderma stimulates plant growth. F. temperatum and M. hiemalis also translocated D 2 O (and simultaneously 15 N from amino acids) from the donor side into the receiver side soils. This transfer was also contingent upon the presence of a receiver plant and was not observed when receivers were absent. We did not find ammonium derived nitrogen transfer suggesting the preference of organic nitrogen sources by these endophytes. While plant D was also elevated across all fungal treatments relative to the natural abundance control, they were not higher than the isotope control, suggesting non-fungal mediated D 2 O uptake in the plants. We know from an earlier study demonstrating that endophytic Alternaria alternata can transfer a visible dye serving as a tracer for water when injected into donor plant leaves into receiver plant tissues [ 21 ]. A. alternata is also a root endophyte, and thus, there may also be fungal-mediated water transfer into plant tissue in our study system but not at levels that can be distinguished from non-fungal pathways. Resource transfer by M. hiemalis differed in the presence or absence of a receiver plant. We observed a switch of translocation of 13 C from amino acids to the receiver side soil in the absence of a receiver plant to the transfer of D 2 O and 15 N from amino acids in the presence of a receiver plant. While disproportionate focus in CMN research is typically on plant growth and resource uptake [ 5 ], this result demonstrates that endophytic fungi themselves functionally respond to the presence of more than one host plant, with implications for CEN resource exchange. We suggest that M. hiemalis is more dependent on soil carbon compounds from the donor side in the absence of a receiver plant, but when simultaneously connected to both donor and receiver plants, hosts may supply the fungus with plant carbon and the fungus can switch to acquiring more soil-derived nitrogen and water. This type of trophic flexibility may be unique to CENs since endophytes widely possess saprotrophic capacities while mycorrhizal fungi generally lost this ability [ 35 ]. Future research should balance how changes in both host plants and fungal functioning shift when endophytes produce continuous fungal networks because their distinct trophic flexibility differentiates them from CMNs. Common fungal network resource niche partitioning Resource type and transfer rate varied among the three studied endophytes. F. temperatum , and possibly also M. hiemalis provided nitrogen and increased water transport while T. viride provided carbon. Fusarium also translocated more nitrogen and water than Mucor . To capture the idea that different endophytes contribute unique benefits to hosts when forming CFNs consisting of multiple CENs (or other CFNs), we propose the concept of ‘common fungal network resource niche partitioning (CFN-RNP)’. Since many endophytes co-exist in host plant roots in natural environments [ 24 ], each endophyte could contribute individual benefits to a CEN when simultaneously colonizing multiple host plants, underscoring the potential importance of endophyte biodiversity. Previous research has demonstrated that soil endophyte biodiversity is positively linked to plant growth [ 12 ], and while the involvement of CENs in natural systems remains untested, CFN-RNP provides an important framework for incorporating ecological concepts into CFN research. We suggest that further studies test the effect and transfer outcomes of resources in inoculations with multiple endophytic species to account for more complex network dynamics. Study limitations This study is the first to show that soil nutrients (C and N) can move from donor soils to receiver plants when both are colonized by a single endophytic fungal genet. Although future field tests are needed, several limitations of our controlled experiment complicate interpretation.We lacked full controls for the + E/+I/-R treatment (e.g., -E/-I/-R, -E/+I/-R), so we cannot completely rule out isotope deposition from fungal exudates or necromass. However, this is unlikely because the only difference to the main treatment was the absense of a receiver plant and roots were separated by barriers. For the + E/+I/-R treatment, we relied on 13 C-labelled amino acids and 15 N-NH 4 representative for C and N transfer, but because C and N moved independently, 13 C data cannot be used to estimate amino acid-derived 15 N dynamics. We also did not include plates without a donor plant to test for donor-independent transfer. Nonetheless, both donor and receiver plants were highly colonized, and the presence of two plants (with or without the receiver plant) altered transfer patterns, indicating that removing the donor would also change resource movement. Still, without a donor-exclusion treatment, we cannot isolate the donor influence. Finally, plant tissue controls for D 2 O were elevated above natural abundance and similar to fungal treatments, and despite minimizing the timeframe between D 2 O addition and sampling, this effect remained substantial suggesting an abiotic transfer pathway into plant tissue. Conclusion We found evidence for the formation of CENs in supporting transport of soil resources. This opens the possibility of ecologically relevant belowground networks beyond CMNs. The interconnection of concurrent networks by different fungal guilds could form an extensive network providing a multitude of functions, which may be unique across ecosystems where each fungal component plays its distinct role. CFN-RNP could play a central role in those network dynamics and may act similar to compartmentalization in cells, whereby a single fungal species would act like an organelle making an unique contribution to overall functioning. If these networks also form in natural ecosystems, this will reveal an unknown role of endophyte diversity in shaping plant-plant interactions. Future research on CMNs will need to account for the fact that endophytes can also transfer resources from donor side to receiver plants. In conclusion, we propose an unknown role of endophytes in ecosystem functioning which could have important implications for ecosystem management where the current focus concentrates on mycorrhizal fungi. Materials and methods I. Experimental design The experiment was set up in three-way split petri dishes to control for direct plant rootconnection and to facilitate fungal colonization of donor and receiver plants. The plates were constructed from triple-split petri dishes where two 2 cm holes were melted into the lids to allow plant outgrowth. In contrast to earlier approaches for studying CMNs [ 5 ], [ 36 ], [ 37 ], we chose an approach without a mesh barrier. Since all endophytes used in this study overgrow internal barriers of triple-split petri dish plates (Suppl. Figure 2), there was no need for mesh to establish barriers to exclude root contact since roots did not come into contact even without mesh and this approach also better allowed us to control for soil water flow. The plates were sterilized by sequential treatment with 5% sodium hypochlorite (30 min), sterile water rinsing, 70% ethanol (15 min), and UV exposure (30 min) in a laminar flow hood. The holes were sealed with parafilm until fungal inoculation to maintain sterility. For plate assembly, Modified Melin Norkans (MMN) agar was poured into one of the three plate compartments to the level of the internal barriers to support hyphal growth into the two soil compartments. The agar compartments were covered with white paper to simulate soil darkness. The plants were transferred with tweezers into a sterile growth substrate consisting of equal parts sand, vermiculite, and potting soil. One endophyte species was inoculated per plate and the isotopes were exclusively added to the donor side. The experiment consisted of four separate treatments where E = endophyte, I = isotope, R = receiver plant, and ‘+’ and ‘-’ refer to the presence or absence of an experimental level, respectively: (1) + E/+I/+R, (2) + E/+I/-R, (3) -E/+I/+R, (4) -E/-I/+R. Additionally, there were three endophyte species levels, two isotope addition levels (organic and inorganic nitrogen source), and three measured isotopic elements ( 15 N, 13 C, deuterium). The organic versus inorganic N treatments represent the two opposing 15 N-labeled nitrogen sources (ammonium versus amino acids; see below). In the + E/+I/+R treatment, a recipient and a donor plant were inoculated with an endophyte and both isotope treatments (α, ß) (6 replicates per species and per isotope treatment). In the + E/+I/-R treatment, a donor plant was inoculated with an endophyte without a receiver plant and with only one isotope treatment (α) to account for the potential deposit of isotope-containing compounds through fungal exudates and necromass (4 replicates per species). The -E/+I/+R treatment was an isotope control where no endophyte was added but both isotope treatments (α, ß) were included to test for transport mechanisms in the absence of inoculated endophytes (5 replicates per isotope treatment). Finally, the -E/-I/+R treatment served as our natural abundance control without endophytes nor isotopes (10 replicates). II. Choice of plant and endophyte species The organisms used in this study were Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0), T. viride, F. temperatum , and M. hiemalis . Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seeds were obtained from the Eurasian Arabidopsis Stock Centre (uNASC), an established public research repository. The fungal isolates ( Trichoderma viride, Fusarium temperatum, and Mucor hiemalis ) were obtained from MyPilz for research purposes ( https://mypilz.eu/ ) and are publicly available for research purposes upon request. Species identification of the fungal isolates were provided by the supplier using DNA metabarcoding. No field collection of plant or fungal material was conducted in this study. As all biological materials were acquired from authorized providers and not collected in situ, no collection permits, geographical coordinates, or wild-origin voucher specimens apply. All materials were used in accordance with institutional, national, and international regulations. A. thaliana seeds were first cold stratified at 4°C for 48 h, sown into a non-sterile potting soil (this was necessary to promote plant growth which was much lower in sterilized potting soil), and after 36 days when plants had an established rosette, plants were then transferred to the plates with inoculated endophytes. The fungal strains were cultivated on MMN agar and hyphae from the growing periphery containing agar plugs (0.5 cm³) were used for inoculation. While germinating Arabidopsis in unsterilized potting soil may allow exogenous fungi to colonize its roots, plants were subsequently transferred into a sterile environment in the plates with high propagule pressure of the inoculated fungus. F. temperatum is primarily regarded as a hemibiotrophic pathogen that possesses saprotrophic and parasitic abilities to colonize roots [ 28 ], [ 29 ], [ 30 ]. While Fusarium often acts pathogenically, many can also behave as mutualistic endophytes [ 38 ], and F. temperatum can colonize Brassicaceae root systems [ 28 ]. For F. temperatum , we used the strain MP-PP9 which was isolated from a maize plant infected with Ustilago maydis near Riegersburg, Austria. Mucor species can enhance plant growth [ 39 ], [ 40 ], and M. hiemalis can specifically promote host plant nutrient uptake and confer protection against pathogens [ 41 ], [ 42 ]. M. hiemalis is considered a saprotrophic fungus capable of endophytically colonizing roots [ 43 ], [ 44 ] and, being a member of the Mucoromycotina, it can form symbioses with plants similar to mycorrhizae (‘Mucoromycotina fine root endophytes’ (MFRE); [ 45 ], [ 46 ], [ 47 ]. MFRE have been shown to facilitate direct nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon exchange with a host [ 47 ]. For M. hiemalis , we used the strain MP-304-2-R1 which was isolated from roots in a soil sample near Falkenstein, Austria. Fungi from the genus Trichoderma are considered free-living saprotrophs that can be especially beneficial to plants as endophytes by colonizing their roots, and A. thaliana has been studied extensively for its responses to Trichoderma species [ 18 ], [ 33 ], [ 43 ], [ 48 ], [ 49 ], [ 50 ], [ 51 ], [ 52 ]. T. viride can enhance plant growth and confer pathogen protection within A. thaliana [ 33 ], [ 34 ], [ 53 ], [ 54 ]. For T. viride , we used the strain MP-206-8 which was isolated from soil near Gutenstein, Austria. In summary, all three species are capable of colonizing plant roots and are expected to follow a continuum of mutualistic effects whereby Trichoderma > Mucor > Fusarium . F. temperatum was introduced to the plates five days before, and T. viride and M. hiemalis four days before plant addition to ensure growth dominance of the inoculated fungi over those potentially carried over from the plant roots from the non-sterile soil (see above). F. temperatum is fast growing but less quickly than T. viride and M. hiemalis . For fungal inoculation, the plates were incubated at 28°C. After plant addition, the plates were incubated in a growth chamber with a constant humidity of 65% for 16 days at 20°C and 300 µmole/m 2 s light density at day and 15°C and no light at night (12 hours). During the first three days, twelve non-viable plants were replaced with healthy individuals. Watering until moist but not oversaturated with water continued every two days with care taken to avoid cross-contamination between compartments by over-watering. Four plants were removed due to mortality (two from the control and two from inoculation with M. hiemalis ). III. Isotope additions Isotopes were added to assess nitrogen, carbon, and water transfer from donor to receiver plant compartments. Four days after plant addition, soil samples from three plates (one per fungal species) were collected for total soil nitrogen analysis to determine how much labelled amino acid to spike into the donor compartment. Total nitrogen was quantified on finely ground soils using dry combustion on an Elemental Analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-IRMS), which was also used to quantify isotope enrichment (see below). This was used to estimate total amino acid content in the soil assuming amino acids are ca. 33% of the total N content [ 55 ], [ 56 ], [ 57 ], [ 58 ], [ 59 ]. We also measured ammonium content using a modified Berthelot reaction [ 60 ] from 2M KCl extractions (5 g soil, 20 mL KCl). We then added labelled substrates corresponding in amount to only 1% of the already present soil pools to avoid a fertilization effect. Isotopic treatments α ( 13 C-amino acid mixture and 15 NH₄) and β ( 15 N-amino acid mixture) were applied to the donor plants after 16 days of plant growth. We used highly enriched substrates, including ammonium- 15 N 2 sulfate (99 atom % 15 N) and 98% 13 C/ 15 N atom content mixed amino acids extracted from algae (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories ALGAL AMINO ACID MIXTURE). To minimize exchange of deuterium in the water, the deuterium (D) treatment was applied for both isotope treatments only 48h before sampling (after 22 days) by adding 400 µl 20% D 2 O (99 atom % D). We used isotopically labelled amino acids, ammonium, and water to test different transfer outcomes among CFNs. We added both 13 C- and 15 N-labelled amino acids to assess whether endophytes may also transfer carbon from amino acids (versus just N), and we added 15 N-NH₄ to assess transport of nitrogen from an inorganic versus organic source. IV. Sampling and analysis Sampling was conducted 24 days after plant transfer to inoculation plates. Plants were removed from the plates and separated into above and belowground parts. Leaves and shoots (hereafter: “plant”; we only used above-ground plant parts as we cannot differentiate isotope uptake into plant versus fungal tissues in and around the roots) and soils were dried at 60°C for 72 h and ground for analysis on an elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (EA-IRMS) to determine isotopic incorporation into aboveground tissues and transfer into soils. The roots were stained with trypan blue to assess fungal colonization using the grid-intersection method (McGonigle et al., 1990). A light microscope was used to evaluate colonization at 40x magnification by dividing roots into 50 sections and scoring the presence or absence of hyphae. V. Statistical analysis All statistical analyses were conducted in R (v4.3.1), and significance was set to P ≤ 0.05. ANOVAs (aov function), F-tests (var.test function), t-tests (t.test function), and Pearson correlations (cor.test function) from base R were used for the analyses. For the isotope addition treatments, we first tested whether the isotope control and natural abundance control treatments differed to evaluate potential non-fungal mediated resource transfer. We tested whether variance was equal between the samples using F-tests and then used two-sided Welch’s t-tests if the variance was unequal (setting var.equal = FALSE) and two-sided Student’s t-tests if the variance was equal. If the isotope and natural abundance controls differed, then we then tested for differences among fungal treatments against both controls. If the controls did not differ, we compared fungal differences to the natural abundance control. To test this, we used ANOVA and calculated type III sums of squares. Normality of the residuals was inspected, and when necessary, the data was log transformed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests (kruskal.test function) were used as a non-parametric alternative when the log-transformed model residuals were not normally distributed or when a log transformation was not possible due to negative values, such as observed for foliar δ 13 C. To test whether individual fungal treatments increased isotope values relative to the control and for the physiological analyses, we first tested whether the variance of samples was equal using F-tests, and we then used one-sided Welch’s t-tests for samples with unequal variance and one-sided Student’s t-tests for samples with equal variances. Declarations Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests. Author Contribution Conceptualization: M.A.A., P.W.; Analysis: P.W., M.A.A.; Investigation: P.W., M.A.A., P.S., A.G., M.S.; Resources: M.A.A.; Writing a First draft: P.W.; Reviewing and Editing: All authors; Supervision: M.A.A., P.S. Acknowledgements This work was supported by a Vienna Science and Technology Fund VRG awarded to M.A. (VRG22-007). Data Availability All analysis scripts and data are accessible in the following repository:https://gitlab.com/fungalecology/cen References Bahram, M. & Netherway, T. Fungi as mediators linking organisms and ecosystems, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. , vol. 46, no. 2, p. fuab058, Mar. (2022). 10.1093/femsre/fuab058 Brundrett, M. C. & Tedersoo, L. Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity, New Phytol. , vol. 220, no. 4, pp. 1108–1115, Dec. (2018). 10.1111/nph.14976 Ruotsalainen, A. L. et al. Dark septate endophytes: mutualism from by-products? Trends Plant Sci. , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 247–254, Mar. (2022). 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.001 Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M. & Sanders, I. R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future, New Phytol. , vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 1406–1423, Mar. (2015). 10.1111/nph.13288 Karst, J., Jones, M. D. & Hoeksema, J. D. Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests, Nat. Ecol. Evol. , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 501–511, Feb. (2023). 10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1 Simard, S. W. & Durall, D. M. Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance, Can. J. Bot. , vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1140–1165, Aug. (2004). 10.1139/b04-116 Beiler, K. J., Durall, D. M., Simard, S. W., Maxwell, S. A. & Kretzer, A. M. Architecture of the wood-wide web: Rhizopogon spp. genets link multiple Douglas‐fir cohorts. New. Phytol . 185 (2), 543–553. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03069.x (Jan. 2010). Klein, T., Siegwolf, R. T. W. & Körner, C. Belowground carbon trade among tall trees in a temperate forest. Science 352 , 342–344. 10.1126/science.aad6188 (Apr. 2016). Song, Y. Y., Simard, S. W., Carroll, A., Mohn, W. W. & Zeng, R. S. Defoliation of interior Douglas-fir elicits carbon transfer and stress signalling to ponderosa pine neighbors through ectomycorrhizal networks. Sci. Rep. 5 (1), 8495. 10.1038/srep08495 (Feb. 2015). Warren, J. M., Brooks, J. R., Meinzer, F. C. & Eberhart, J. L. Hydraulic redistribution of water from Pinus ponderosa trees to seedlings: evidence for an ectomycorrhizal pathway, New Phytol. , vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 382–394, Apr. (2008). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02377.x Alam, B. et al. Endophytic Fungi: From Symbiosis to Secondary Metabolite Communications or Vice Versa? Front. Plant. Sci. 12 , 791033. 10.3389/fpls.2021.791033 (Dec. 2021). Anthony, M. A. et al. Fungal community composition predicts forest carbon storage at a continental scale. Nat. Commun. 15 (1), 2385. 10.1038/s41467-024-46792-w (Mar. 2024). Brundrett, M. C. Understanding the Roles of Multifunctional Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi, in Microbial Root Endophytes, (eds Schulz, B. J. E., Boyle, C. J. C. & Sieber, T. N.) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 281–298. doi: 10.1007/3-540-33526-9_16 . (2006). Poveda, J., Eugui, D., Abril-Urías, P. & Velasco, P. Endophytic fungi as direct plant growth promoters for sustainable agricultural production. Symbiosis 85 (1), 1–19. 10.1007/s13199-021-00789-x (Sept. 2021). Rillig, M. C., Lehmann, A., Mounts, I. R. & Bock, B. M. Concurrent common fungal networks formed by different guilds of fungi, New Phytol. , vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 33–38, Apr. (2025). 10.1111/nph.20418 Liao, C. et al. Challenges and update on fungal endophytes: classification, definition, diversity, ecology, evolution and functions. Fungal Divers. 131 (1), 301–367. 10.1007/s13225-025-00550-5 (Mar. 2025). Newsham, K. K. A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New. Phytol . 190 (3), 783–793. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x (May 2011). Fesel, P. H. & Zuccaro, A. Dissecting endophytic lifestyle along the parasitism/mutualism continuum in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 32 , 103–112. 10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.008 (Aug. 2016). Rodriguez, R. J., White, J. F. Jr, Arnold, A. E. & Redman, R. S. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New. Phytol . 182 (2), 314–330. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x (Apr. 2009). Stone, P. & White, E. Unpublished . (2004). 10.13140/RG.2.1.2497.0726 Bock, B. M., Hoeksema, J. D., Johnson, N. C. & Gehring, C. A. Evidence for common fungal networks among plants formed by a Dark Septate Endophyte in Sorghum bicolor. Commun. Biol. 8 (1), 996. 10.1038/s42003-025-08432-x (July 2025). Simard, S. et al. Resource Transfer Between Plants Through Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Networks, in Mycorrhizal Networks , vol. 224, T. R. Horton, Ed., in Ecological Studies, vol. 224., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 133–176. (2015). 10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_5 Almario, J., Fabiańska, I., Saridis, G. & Bucher, M. Unearthing the plant–microbe quid pro quo in root associations with beneficial fungi. New. Phytol . 234 (6), 1967–1976. 10.1111/nph.18061 (June 2022). García, E., Alonso, Á., Platas, G. & Sacristán, S. The endophytic mycobiota of Arabidopsis thaliana. Fungal Divers. 60 (1), 71–89. 10.1007/s13225-012-0219-0 (May 2013). Mandyam, K. G., Roe, J. & Jumpponen, A. Arabidopsis thaliana model system reveals a continuum of responses to root endophyte colonization. Fungal Biol. 117 (4), 250–260. 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.02.001 (Apr. 2013). Mandyam, K. G. & Jumpponen, A. Mutualismâ€parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Front. Microbiol. 5 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776 (Jan. 2015). Rather, R. A. Shaping Plant Growth Beneath the Soil: A Theoretical Exploration of Fungal Endophyte’s Role as Plant Growth-Promoting Agents. MicrobiologyOpen 14 (4), e70026. 10.1002/mbo3.70026 (Aug. 2025). Orina, A. S., Gagkaeva, T. Y. & Gavrilova, O. P. Novel cruciferous plant host of Fusarium temperatum, a species mainly associated with maize. Australas Plant. Dis. Notes . 18 (1), 37. 10.1007/s13314-023-00523-0 (Nov. 2023). Pfordt, A. et al. Oct., Occurrence, Pathogenicity, and Mycotoxin Production of Fusarium temperatum in Relation to Other Fusarium Species on Maize in Germany, Pathogens , vol. 9, no. 11, p. 864, (2020). 10.3390/pathogens9110864 Robles-Barrios, F. et al. Jan., Fusarium temperatum shows a hemibiotrophic infection process and differential pathogenicity over different maize breeds from Mexico, J. Phytopathol. , vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 21–33, (2022). 10.1111/jph.13052 Schulz, B. & Boyle, C. The endophytic continuum. Mycol. Res. 109 (6), 661–686. 10.1017/S095375620500273X (June 2005). Rousk, J. & Bååth, E. Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil: Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 78 (1), 17–30. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01106.x (Oct. 2011). Guo, K., Sui, Y., Li, Z., Huang, Y. & Zhang, H. Trichoderma viride Tv-1511 Colonizes Arabidopsis Leaves and Promotes Arabidopsis Growth by Modulating the MAP Kinase 6-Mediated Activation of Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase, J. Plant Growth Regul. , vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1261–1276, Sept. (2020). 10.1007/s00344-019-10063-6 Hung, R., Lee, S. & Bennett, J. W. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for testing the effect of Trichoderma volatile organic compounds. Fungal Ecol. 6 (1), 19–26. 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.09.005 (Feb. 2013). Kohler, A. et al. Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. Nat. Genet. 47 (4), 410–415 (2015). He, X., Xu, M., Qiu, G. Y. & Zhou, J. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants, J. Plant Ecol. , vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107–118, Sept. (2009). 10.1093/jpe/rtp015 Hoeksema, J. D. Experimentally Testing Effects of Mycorrhizal Networks on Plant-Plant Interactions and Distinguishing Among Mechanisms, in Mycorrhizal Networks , vol. 224, T. R. Horton, Ed., in Ecological Studies, vol. 224., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 255–277. (2015). 10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_9 Kuldau, G. A. & Yates, I. E. Evidence for Fusarium endophytes, Microb. Endophytes , vol. 85, Accessed: Nov. 07, 2025. [Online]. (2000). Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=o0dZDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA85&dq=Kuldau,+Gretchen+A.,+and+Ida+E.+Yates.+ %22Evidence+for+Fusarium+endophytes.%22+Microbial+endophytes+85+(2000)&ots=ovX4Z10xI2&sig=5ub-J_Xys_jzeAEMXgqnOgadVJ8 Rozpądek, P. et al. The Role of Strigolactone in the Cross-Talk Between Arabidopsis thaliana and the Endophytic Fungus Mucor sp. Front. Microbiol. 9 , 441. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00441 (Mar. 2018). Rozpądek, P. et al. How does the endophytic fungus Mucor sp. improve Arabidopsis arenosa vegetation in the degraded environment of a mine dump? Environ. Exp. Bot. 147 , 31–42. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.009 (Mar. 2018). García-Latorre, C., Rodrigo, S. & Santamaria, O. Effect of fungal endophytes on plant growth and nutrient uptake in Trifolium subterraneum and Poa pratensis as affected by plant host specificity, Mycol. Prog. , vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1217–1231, Sept. (2021). 10.1007/s11557-021-01732-6 Ziedan, E. S. H. E., Farrag, E. S. H. & Sahab, A. F. First record and preliminary evaluation of Mucor hiemalis as biocontrol agent on inflorescence brown rot incidence of date palm, Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. , vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 617–626, Mar. (2013). 10.1080/03235408.2012.749695 De Boer, W. et al. Antifungal Rhizosphere Bacteria Can increase as Response to the Presence of Saprotrophic Fungi. PLOS ONE . 10 (9), e0137988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137988 (Sept. 2015). Rungjindamai, N. & Jones, E. B. G. Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review. J. Fungi . 10 (1), 67. 10.3390/jof10010067 (Jan. 2024). Field, K. J. et al. Functional analysis of liverworts in dual symbiosis with Glomeromycota and Mucoromycotina fungi under a simulated Palaeozoic CO2 decline. ISME J. 10 (6), 1514–1526. 10.1038/ismej.2015.204 (June 2016). Hoysted, G. A. et al. Mucoromycotina Fine Root Endophyte Fungi Form Nutritional Mutualisms with Vascular Plants. Plant. Physiol. 181 (2), 565–577. 10.1104/pp.19.00729 (Oct. 2019). Hoysted, G. A. et al. Direct nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon exchanges between Mucoromycotina ‘fine root endophyte’ fungi and a flowering plant in novel monoxenic cultures, New Phytol. , vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 70–79, Apr. (2023). 10.1111/nph.18630 Alonso-Ramírez, A. et al. Salicylic acid prevents T richoderma harzianum from entering the vascular system of roots, Mol. Plant Pathol. , vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 823–831, Oct. (2014). 10.1111/mpp.12141 Brotman, Y. et al. Trichoderma-Plant Root Colonization: Escaping Early Plant Defense Responses and Activation of the Antioxidant Machinery for Saline Stress Tolerance. PLoS Pathog . 9 (3), e1003221. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003221 (Mar. 2013). Contreras-Cornejo, H. A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., Cortés-Penagos, C. & López-Bucio, J. Trichoderma virens , a Plant Beneficial Fungus, Enhances Biomass Production and Promotes Lateral Root Growth through an Auxin-Dependent Mechanism in Arabidopsis, Plant Physiol. , vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 1579–1592, Mar. (2009). 10.1104/pp.108.130369 Jalali, F., Zafari, D. & Salari, H. Volatile organic compounds of some Trichoderma spp. increase growth and induce salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Fungal Ecol. 29 , 67–75. 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.06.007 (Oct. 2017). Morán-Diez, E. et al. Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24 h incubation with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. J. Plant. Physiol. 169 (6), 614–620. 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016 (Apr. 2012). Garstecka, Z. et al. Trichoderma viride Colonizes the Roots of Brassica napus L., Alters the Expression of Stress-Responsive Genes, and Increases the Yield of Canola under Field Conditions during Drought. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (20), 15349. 10.3390/ijms242015349 (Oct. 2023). Luna-Hernández, L. E., Huerta-Palacios, G., Holguín-Meléndez, F. & Guillén-Navarro, K. Root colonisation and induction of plant defence-associated signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana by Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces galilaeus, and Trichoderma viride, July 18, 2025, In Review . 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7125135/v1 Friedel, J. K. & Scheller, E. Composition of hydrolysable amino acids in soil organic matter and soil microbial biomass, Soil Biol. Biochem. , vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 315–325, Mar. (2002). 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00185-7 Goh, K. M. & Edmeades, D. C. Distribution and partial characterisation of acid hydrolysable organic nitrogen in six New Zealand soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 11 (2), 127–132. 10.1016/0038-0717(79)90088-9 (Jan. 1979). Houtermans, M. et al. Nov., Nitrogen sequestration under long-term paddy management in soils developed on contrasting parent material, Biol. Fertil. Soils , vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 837–848, (2017). 10.1007/s00374-017-1223-z Senwo, Z. N. & Tabatabai, M. A. Amino acid composition of soil organic matter, Biol. Fertil. Soils , vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 235–242, Feb. (1998). 10.1007/s003740050373 Vergara, C. et al. Contribution of dark septate fungi to the nutrient uptake and growth of rice plants. Braz J. Microbiol. 49 (1), 67–78. 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.010 (Jan. 2018). Braman, R. S. & Hendrix, S. A. Nanogram nitrite and nitrate determination in environmental and biological materials by vanadium(III) reduction with chemiluminescence detection, Anal. Chem. , vol. 61, no. 24, pp. 2715–2718, Dec. (1989). 10.1021/ac00199a007 McGONIGLE, T. P., Miller, M. H., Evans, D. G., Fairchild, G. L. & Swan, J. A. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New. Phytol . 115 (3), 495–501. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x (July 1990). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryMaterials.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 28 Jan, 2026 Reviews received at journal 06 Jan, 2026 Reviews received at journal 04 Jan, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 20 Dec, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 18 Dec, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 17 Dec, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 17 Dec, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 17 Dec, 2025 Editor invited by journal 16 Dec, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 09 Dec, 2025 First submitted to journal 09 Dec, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8288489","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":562356935,"identity":"8749dcc5-07dd-4198-98ae-436f81a77e47","order_by":0,"name":"Philipp Waschk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Waschk","suffix":""},{"id":562356936,"identity":"7c816e8d-faeb-4edd-a84b-e715c8149f5a","order_by":1,"name":"Philipp Spiegel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Spiegel","suffix":""},{"id":562356937,"identity":"3e259ef4-9e44-40d3-b994-8c1a54f943f8","order_by":2,"name":"Arthur Gessler","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research (WSL)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Arthur","middleName":"","lastName":"Gessler","suffix":""},{"id":562356938,"identity":"190af0b6-1431-4be2-9187-f126a7e7b6f5","order_by":3,"name":"Matthias Sauer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research (WSL)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matthias","middleName":"","lastName":"Sauer","suffix":""},{"id":562356939,"identity":"4f7a7ca8-4843-4704-b6f9-074266df0475","order_by":4,"name":"Beatrice M. Bock","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Northern Arizona University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Beatrice","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Bock","suffix":""},{"id":562356947,"identity":"5d15b7b4-2d34-49c0-9471-11a2bceba091","order_by":5,"name":"Wolfgang Hinterdobler","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"MyPilz GmbH","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wolfgang","middleName":"","lastName":"Hinterdobler","suffix":""},{"id":562356949,"identity":"41e7f88c-2b42-4b1f-ba91-888a08262cd0","order_by":6,"name":"Mark A. Anthony","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mark","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Anthony","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-05 13:53:38","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":98628879,"identity":"68d3f2a2-9b53-4186-9f53-166a5e605e9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:12:43","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1036382,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Waschketal2025.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/3016f3404b2e2d51cc1f468a.docx"},{"id":98593484,"identity":"e1646344-19e5-464d-b164-36cd10e61548","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":8579,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dacb9b9dd7d443d6b0ba683896c14679.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/e4271d3b9427ec035d9ff7a3.json"},{"id":98593489,"identity":"6872724b-bc45-4100-b6fa-e0ef82911d59","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1216414,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterials.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/8114bcbee4dbfddf2f16b34c.pdf"},{"id":98627483,"identity":"d16d3a49-43a1-4dd8-a3ae-be2baf298f0c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:10:23","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":151532,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dacb9b9dd7d443d6b0ba683896c146791enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/c1c37940822c242823c683c4.xml"},{"id":98593496,"identity":"4e04a57b-6ae2-4a63-9193-d1c0093dfcf5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2542766,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/0601df4ab2146c6bff5b2477.jpeg"},{"id":98628690,"identity":"ddaa7699-4c32-4f96-82ba-a7d353e59d0e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:12:03","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3040710,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/41dab0875b542a65151da52e.jpeg"},{"id":98593497,"identity":"6258b1a0-6e0d-4af9-b0df-7d1262bbb049","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":25923878,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/1f9bf027c2281321c8eeb3f6.jpeg"},{"id":98593492,"identity":"a71d629b-8fae-4117-a8af-027f505af652","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":89911,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/66d56146c7a0560817159e24.png"},{"id":98627708,"identity":"65b788e6-07e4-4d88-9ad4-42ac91b4ceac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:10:35","extension":"xml","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":150721,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"dacb9b9dd7d443d6b0ba683896c146791structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/1fc35dee67613219fb5720d4.xml"},{"id":98628100,"identity":"ecff6bd4-e1c5-4635-8118-ce942f652fd5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:10:59","extension":"html","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":167587,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/6269613961a3f3c465632acc.html"},{"id":98593491,"identity":"7c840033-df8f-4612-8dac-67087cf6ecbd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":539694,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExperimental design\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eto test for resource transfer via common endophyte networks.\u003c/strong\u003e The experimental design tests for resource transfer from donor compartment soils into receiver plants (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e) when controlling for transfer without a receiver plant present (\u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e), for non-fungal mediated resource transfer (\u003cstrong\u003ec\u003c/strong\u003e), and for natural abundances of the isotope of the labelled substrate of interest (\u003cstrong\u003ed\u003c/strong\u003e; see substrates tested in the legend). The four main panels depict these four experimental treatments consisting of two isotope addition levels and three species levels. The receiver compartments used for the analyses are marked in red. See Supplementary Fig. 1 for pictures of inoculated plates.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/7ab5fc5a1580cd4c46033041.png"},{"id":98593487,"identity":"036b0d30-3e3d-4385-804d-7c2b74bc16c5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":17703,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIsotopic analyses of soil without a receiver plant. \u003c/strong\u003eAmino acid-derived δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC in soil showing significant increase of δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC in the \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e treatment (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.05) (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e). NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e-derived δ\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in soil (\u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e). D2O derived δD in the soil showing significant increase of δD by \u003cem\u003eT. viride \u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.04) (\u003cstrong\u003ec\u003c/strong\u003e). Note that a ‘*’ means \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e ≤ 0.05. For visualization purposes, the natural abundance control with receiver plant has been added to the figure.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/ffee8465bbfc02c34907537d.png"},{"id":98628139,"identity":"a14a5601-ef25-4bb1-a4e9-d86b5f4b7bcc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:11:00","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":27967,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhysiological analyses of the receiver plants. \u003c/strong\u003eVariation in plant biomass growth showing a significant increase in plant biomass by \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum \u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.01) (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e). Linear correlation of fungal root colonization and plant biomass with control treatments excluded (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.01, \u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e = 0.51) (\u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e). Changes in total plant nitrogen content by fungal species showing significant increase of total plant nitrogen by \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis \u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.001) (\u003cstrong\u003ec\u003c/strong\u003e). Note that ‘**’ means p ≤ 0.01.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/c5ead4272c50688597cbcb1d.png"},{"id":98593488,"identity":"61c4b244-38c4-48b4-9a9b-73eb533ada01","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":87990,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIsotopic analyses of receiver plants under fungal inoculation treatments. \u003c/strong\u003eAmino acid-derived δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC in the plant (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e) and soil (\u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e) showing significant increase of δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC in plants by \u003cem\u003eT. viride \u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.049) (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e). NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e-derived δ\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in the plant (\u003cstrong\u003ec\u003c/strong\u003e) and soil (\u003cstrong\u003ed\u003c/strong\u003e). Amino acid-derived δ\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in the plant (\u003cstrong\u003ee\u003c/strong\u003e) and soil (\u003cstrong\u003ef\u003c/strong\u003e) showing significant increase of\u0026nbsp; δ\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN by \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum \u003c/em\u003ein plants (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.017) and soil (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.001) and by \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis \u003c/em\u003ein soil (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.007). δD in the plant (\u003cstrong\u003eg\u003c/strong\u003e) showing significant differences between the natural abundance control (Control (NA)) and the isotope control (Control (I); \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.0007, Suppl. Fig. 4c), \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.002), \u003cem\u003eT. viride (p = 0.0019) \u003c/em\u003eand\u003cem\u003e M. hiemalis \u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.01) were all higher than the natural abundance control (Control (NA)) but not different from the isotope control (Control (I)). D2O-derived δD in the soil showing significant increase of δD by \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum \u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.0001) and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis \u003c/em\u003ein soil (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.04) (\u003cstrong\u003eh\u003c/strong\u003e). Note that ‘*’ means \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e ≤ 0.05; ** means \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e ≤ 0.01).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/23272aeab784cd52f47c4da8.png"},{"id":98632158,"identity":"db55ba5e-cb85-4f1c-a628-477ac64f475f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:21:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1743046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/258d5930-7039-4c43-97e1-7dcc620281f0.pdf"},{"id":98593485,"identity":"745f1de7-115e-4906-98a4-c8d499c4c672","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 11:06:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1216414,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterials.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8288489/v1/13ee79864facb2c8c58f7a1b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eCross-kingdom interactions with fungi strongly influence plant development and biodiversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Fungal symbionts are particularly important, with mycorrhizal fungi receiving the most attention because they form tight associations with plant roots and confer nutritional and pathogen resistance benefits [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Some mycorrhizal fungi form so-called \u0026lsquo;common mycorrhizal networks\u0026rsquo; (CMNs) characterized by a mycorrhizal fungus connecting the roots of two or more plants via continuous extraradical mycelium [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. CMNs can connect the roots of different plants [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e] and have been implicated in transporting water, nitrogen, and carbon [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. While mycorrhizal fungi have received most attention for forming these cross-plant networks, there is another, separate group of plant-associated fungi known as endophytes. Endophytes may play similarly important roles in improving plant growth, increasing nutrient supply, and potentially even forming continuous mycelia networks to interconnect plants [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. In this study, we define endophytes \u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Liao et al., (2025) as asymptomatic microbial partners that co-inhabit healthy internal plant tissues with the ability to confer benefits.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEndophytes can be found in nearly all living plants in natural ecosystems. Root inhabiting endophytes can improve host plant growth and nutrient uptake [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite their ubiquity and contributions to plant development, this group stands out as particularly understudied in ecological analyses, especially when colonizing non-grass hosts and on plant root systems where the capacity to form networks in the soil is possible [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. Recently, evidence that endophytes can form CMN-like networks was first demonstrated. An endophytic \u003cem\u003eAlternaria\u003c/em\u003e was shown to mediate transfer of a water-soluble dye injected into \u0026ldquo;donor plant\u0026rdquo; leaves into receiver plants [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. This study establishes that \u0026ldquo;CENs\u0026rdquo; (common endophyte networks) can be formed among co-occurring grasses, and it raises the possibility that endophytes may more broadly engage in this type of mycelium establishment to transport soil resources that plants need for growth, such as nitrogen, water, and possibly even carbon [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo address this, we investigated whether CENs established by a range of endophytic species facilitate the exchange of nitrogen (ammonium, amino acids), carbon (amino acids), and water between plants colonized by the same fungal individual. Soil-derived water, nitrogen, and to a much lesser extent, photosynthetic-derived carbon are expected to be transported via CMNs (Simard et al., 2015), and thus we focused on soil resource versus photosynthetic carbon transfer. Like most studies tracking soil nutrient exchange via CMNs, this involves measuring resource transfer of isotopically labelled substrates from a \u0026ldquo;donor\u0026rdquo; compartment soil into a receiver plant with or without a contiguous fungal network. This should be conceptualized as comparing resource transfer from donor soil \u0026loz; fungus connecting both plants \u0026loz; receiver plant versus from the donor plant \u0026loz; fungus connecting both plants \u0026loz; receiver plant. We also included a no receiver plant treatment which enabled us to test how fungal nutrient transfer from donor soil \u0026loz; receiver soil shifts in the presence versus absence of a CEN, allowing us to also test changes in fungal functioning (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Typically, the functioning of fungi is not considered in CMN research where the focus is disproportionately on plants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs a host plant, we used \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e and three different endophytic fungal species: \u003cem\u003eFusarium temperatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eMucor hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma viride\u003c/em\u003e. We selected \u003cem\u003eA. thaliana\u003c/em\u003e due to its fast growth, because it is colonized by a large range of endophytic fungi, and because it is a model plant for non-mycorrhizal symbioses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. We selected the endophyte species because of their fast growth rates, broad phylogenetic range, and because of their ecological roles ranging from pathogenicity to mutualism. We hypothesize that all three endophytes facilitate resource transfer from the donor compartment to receiver side plant but that each species will provide different resources, with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e providing the most transfer given its well-described, positive effects on plant development [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\n\u003ch3\u003eI. Validation of the experimental system\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo test whether factors apart from the inoculation with endophytes affected receiver plant physiological and isotopic signatures, we conducted tests to critically evaluate the experimental design. First, we confirmed that isotopically labelled nitrogen did not increase total plant nitrogen nor total soil nitrogen content on the receiver side (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;3a-b), confirming that isotope additions did not have a fertilization effect on the receiver side. Growth of the donor and receiver plant on the same plate were not correlated and were thus considered independent (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;3c). This is expected unless there were plate-level effects that coupled their growth because the plants were not uniform in size prior to out-planting into the plates. Donor and receiver plants also showed similarly high fungal root colonization (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;5), demonstrating that both plants were simultaneously highly colonized. Concurrent root colonization alongside visual fungal in-growth into both the donor and receiver side soils from the fungal compartment (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;2) are signatures of hyphal continuity in the study system. For all subsequent analyses, we only looked at receiver plants to address receiver plant functioning and transfer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere may be non-biological isotope transport via airborne substances or water flow that crossed the dividing barriers to the receiver plant. To test for this, we compared the isotope addition control without fungi (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e; -E/+I/+R) to the natural abundance control ((Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e; -E/-I/+R; see methods). There were no differences between the natural abundance and isotope controls for \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN and \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC for any of the measured parameters, confirming that there was no alternative transport mechanism for carbon and nitrogen onto the receiver side in our experimental set-up (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;4a-b). However, for the added D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, we observed elevated deuterium levels in the receiver plants of the isotope controls compared to the natural abundance control (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0007, Suppl. Table\u0026nbsp;1). Surprisingly, this same pattern was not observed in the receiver soil. Therefore, an alternative transport of deuterated water to the plant but not the soil, like transport by evaporation and subsequent condensation, was present in our experimental set-up (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;4c). Hereafter, only the natural abundance control was used to compare to the inoculation treatment levels (hereafter referred to as \u0026ldquo;control\u0026rdquo;) unless stated otherwise (e.g., in the D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO plant treatment where we also included the isotope control due to the effect mentioned above).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, we included plates with no receiver plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e; +E/+I/-R) and analyzed their receiver soil for isotopic signatures to account for the possibility that the endophytes transported isotopes to the receiver compartment independent of a receiver plant being present, and thus to account for the deposit of isotope-containing compounds through fungal necromass and exudates. We only tested this using \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-labelled amino acids, \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labelled ammonium and D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO. When the added isotopic compound on the donor side was \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-labelled amino acids, inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e increased \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC levels of the receiver soils compared to the controls with no fungus but a receiver plant suggesting immobilization of carbon from the donor side into fungal biomass on the receiver side (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels were not significantly different to the control without an inoculated fungus but with a receiver plant present when the added isotopic compound on the donor side was \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labelled ammonium (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb). There was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on deuterium levels of the receiver soils (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.049, Suppl. Table\u0026nbsp;2). Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04) increased deuterium levels of the receiver soils of the plates without a receiver plant compared to controls without fungi but including a receiver plant suggesting immobilization of water or deuterium-containing compounds from the donor side into fungal biomass on the receiver side (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ec). Inoculations with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e did not show any significant changes in deuterium signatures.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eII. Effects of endophyte inoculation on plant growth and nutrient content\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhysiological analyses of receiver plants were conducted to assess whether inoculation with endophytes affected plant growth and health. Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e increased plant biomass in this experimental setup (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01) and inoculation with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e marginally increased plant biomass (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.07, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Further, fungal root colonization of the receiver plants did not vary across the three endophyte inoculation treatments, meaning that differences in isotopic signatures across fungal species cannot be tracked back to different degrees of root colonization (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;5). Further, fungal root colonization of the receiver plants was positively correlated with plant growth (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01, \u003cem\u003er\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.51, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb). This suggests that a higher degree of root colonization by fungi boosts plant growth, an expected outcome for mutualistic, endophytic fungi. Root colonization of receiver plants was not correlated with plant growth in the control treatments (-E) suggesting that plant growth stimulation was conferred by the inoculated endophytes and not by fungi that were potentially carried over from the unsterile soil from before outplanting (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;3d). Further, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on the total plant nitrogen content of the receiver plants (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001). Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e, but not with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e nor \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e, increased plant nitrogen content in the receiver plants compared to the controls (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ec).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIII. Evidence for resource transfer from donor to receiver via endophytes\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-labelled amino acids were added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-levels of receiver plants (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05). Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e increased receiver plant \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-derived from labelled amino acids (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.049), but not in the receiver soils compared to the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea-b). Importantly, inoculation with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e also did not increase \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-levels in receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant compared to controls with a receiver plant (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). This demonstrates that \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e facilitated direct carbon transport from the donor side to the receiver plant and that the transfer was contingent upon the presence of a receiver plant. In contrast, neither inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e nor with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e had an effect on the\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC levels of receiver plants nor soils compared to the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea,b).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labelled amino acids were added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-levels of receiver soils (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01). Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e also increased \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels of receiver plants by 55% compared to the control (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.017; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ee). \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e also elevated \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels in soil (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ef). As a result, we cannot elucidate whether observed \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in plants was provided indirectly via root uptake from fungal exudated \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN bearing compounds into receiver plant soil and/or directly via continuous hyphal transport from the donor side. Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e increased \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels in receiver soils (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.007) but not plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ee,f). \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e also transferred less \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN than \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum.\u003c/em\u003e Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e did not significantly change \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-levels in plant or soil. We did not assess amino acid-derived \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN transfer to receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant to test for fungal mediated N transfer independent of a receiver plant but based on the \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-labelled amino acids and \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-ammonium treatment (see above), we infer that transfer of amino acid-derived \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN to the receiver soil also required a receiver plant, providing support to the idea that amino acid-derived resource transfer to receiver side occurs via continuous fungal networks between two plants. When \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labelled ammonium was added to the donor side, we did not find \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN transfer to the receiver soil or plant for any endophyte species.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO was added to the donor side, there was a significant effect of the fungal inoculations on the deuterium levels of the receiver plants (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.02) and receiver soils (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0001). We assume that the short time frame between D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO addition and sampling would not allow for significant exchange of deuterium and organic matter and transport of these D-enriched compounds, so that the detected changes in δD represent actual relocation of D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO. Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001) and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04) increased deuterium levels of receiver soils compared to the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eh). Further, inoculations with \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e did not affect deuterium levels in receiver soils in the absence of a receiver plant compared to controls with a receiver plant (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ec). This suggests a receiver plant-dependent water transport from donor to receiver soil via \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis.\u003c/em\u003e Like the results of \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN from amino acids, \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e transferred less deuterium than \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum. T. viride\u003c/em\u003e only transferred water to the receiver soil in the absence of a receiver plant (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ec). The isotope control of deuterium in plants was significantly higher than the corresponding natural abundance control (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.0007, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eg, Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;4c). Compared to the natural abundance control, all fungal treatments showed different plant deuterium levels (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Compared to the isotope control, none of the fungal treatments showed different plant deuterium levels, suggesting that an alternative, non-fungal pathway like evaporation and subsequent condensation may also explain significant deuterium enrichment in plants inoculated with different fungi (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eg).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eTransport of resources via endophytic fungal networks extends the established role of non-mycorrhizal fungi beyond affecting a single host plant towards simultaneously impacting interconnected plants. In this study, we observed transfer of amino acid-derived resources from donor plant soils into receiver plant tissues by endophytes. Further, we found different resource allocation patterns among the tested species, and that fungal functioning shifted when engaged in a CEN versus symbiosis with a singular plant. This suggests that endophytes may play a previously unknown role in transferring soil nutrients via CENs, and that endophyte identity influences which types and magnitude of resources get transferred.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eI. Evidence that the tested fungal species are mutualistic endophytes\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll three fungal species were beneficial endophytes (i.e., had beneficial effects on host plants) in our experimental system. Across all species, root colonization was positively correlated with plant growth, which would only be expected if the fungi were acting mutualistically. Though not affecting total plant biomass, \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e increased total plant nitrogen. It did not transfer any of the labelled compounds directly to the plant. It may therefore benefit plants by stimulating decomposition under receiver plants without forming CENs. \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e also stimulated plant growth by 12%, but this effect was only marginally significant. \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e significantly enhanced plant growth by 38% relative to the control. This result stands in contrast to it being previously described as a hemibiotrophic pathogen [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e], but it is consistent with other research showing that \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e species can more broadly act endophytically by stimulating plant growth hormone production and resource uptake [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. In this study we show that \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e can act mutualistically during this plant ontogenetic stage, and that all three tested fungi confer positive impacts on plant development.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eII. Evidence for amino acid nitrogen and carbon transfer by CENs\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe identified endophyte-mediated transfer of amino acid nitrogen and carbon from donor soil compartments into receiver plants. Importantly, both receiver and donor plants were concurrently colonized by the same fungal genet. This was confirmed visually by the growing colony from the inoculation compartment extending into both soil compartments and at a finer scale using microscopy to confirm root colonization. This strongly suggests that there was hyphal continuity between the donor and the receiver plants in this study system, and that resource transfer occurred via a common endophyte network.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e transferred amino acid nitrogen from the donor compartment to receiver plants. \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN enrichment in receiver plant tissues may have been derived from direct plant uptake of \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN bearing compounds in the soil since soil \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels were also elevated by inoculation. This \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN would have come from fungal exudates or necromass. Transfer may also be direct via hyphal continuity from the donor to receiver side. While these two possibilities cannot be teased apart in our study, it is likely the \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in the receiver compartment soil is immobilized in fungal biomass since the study time frame was shorter than typical soil fungal turnover rates [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. This would suggest that the transfer was direct from fungus to plant This interpretation is also supported by our results of other fungi that did not enrich plant \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN levels. Inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e elevated receiver soil \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN but without detectable enrichment in receiver plants, suggesting that observed \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN in the soil was immobilized in fungal tissues otherwise it would be expected to be readily taken up by the plant. Regardless of the mechanism, \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e elevated plant \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN level when connected to more than one plant, and it did not translocate amino acids nor ammonium into receiver compartment soils in the absence of a receiver plant, establishing the importance of having more than one interconnected plant for resource transfer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe also tracked \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e transferred amino acid carbon from the donor compartment into receiver plants. Importantly, \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC levels in the receiver soil were comparable to natural abundance levels, which suggests a direct transfer of carbon from the donor compartment into the receiver plant via a \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e CEN. It is important to note that \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC transfer from amino acids, while significantly higher than the control, was low (+\u0026thinsp;2.83% higher than the natural abundance control), and thus, the ecological importance of CEN-based C transfer from amino acids may be minimal, similar to photosynthetic carbon transport via CMNs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. However, based on previous studies, and our own observations of enhanced development, \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e promotes the growth of \u003cem\u003eA. thaliana\u003c/em\u003e via elevated H+-ATPase activity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e], and even without direct contact via plant-growth promoting volatile organic compounds [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Our findings may be an additional mechanism among the many by which \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e stimulates plant growth.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e also translocated D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO (and simultaneously \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN from amino acids) from the donor side into the receiver side soils. This transfer was also contingent upon the presence of a receiver plant and was not observed when receivers were absent. We did not find ammonium derived nitrogen transfer suggesting the preference of organic nitrogen sources by these endophytes. While plant D was also elevated across all fungal treatments relative to the natural abundance control, they were not higher than the isotope control, suggesting non-fungal mediated D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO uptake in the plants. We know from an earlier study demonstrating that endophytic \u003cem\u003eAlternaria alternata\u003c/em\u003e can transfer a visible dye serving as a tracer for water when injected into donor plant leaves into receiver plant tissues [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003cem\u003eA. alternata\u003c/em\u003e is also a root endophyte, and thus, there may also be fungal-mediated water transfer into plant tissue in our study system but not at levels that can be distinguished from non-fungal pathways.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResource transfer by \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e differed in the presence or absence of a receiver plant. We observed a switch of translocation of \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC from amino acids to the receiver side soil in the absence of a receiver plant to the transfer of D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO and \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN from amino acids in the presence of a receiver plant. While disproportionate focus in CMN research is typically on plant growth and resource uptake [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], this result demonstrates that endophytic fungi themselves functionally respond to the presence of more than one host plant, with implications for CEN resource exchange. We suggest that \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e is more dependent on soil carbon compounds from the donor side in the absence of a receiver plant, but when simultaneously connected to both donor and receiver plants, hosts may supply the fungus with plant carbon and the fungus can switch to acquiring more soil-derived nitrogen and water. This type of trophic flexibility may be unique to CENs since endophytes widely possess saprotrophic capacities while mycorrhizal fungi generally lost this ability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Future research should balance how changes in both host plants and fungal functioning shift when endophytes produce continuous fungal networks because their distinct trophic flexibility differentiates them from CMNs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eCommon fungal network resource niche partitioning\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResource type and transfer rate varied among the three studied endophytes. \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e, and possibly also \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e provided nitrogen and increased water transport while \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e provided carbon. \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e also translocated more nitrogen and water than \u003cem\u003eMucor\u003c/em\u003e. To capture the idea that different endophytes contribute unique benefits to hosts when forming CFNs consisting of multiple CENs (or other CFNs), we propose the concept of \u0026lsquo;common fungal network resource niche partitioning (CFN-RNP)\u0026rsquo;. Since many endophytes co-exist in host plant roots in natural environments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e], each endophyte could contribute individual benefits to a CEN when simultaneously colonizing multiple host plants, underscoring the potential importance of endophyte biodiversity. Previous research has demonstrated that soil endophyte biodiversity is positively linked to plant growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], and while the involvement of CENs in natural systems remains untested, CFN-RNP provides an important framework for incorporating ecological concepts into CFN research. We suggest that further studies test the effect and transfer outcomes of resources in inoculations with multiple endophytic species to account for more complex network dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eStudy limitations\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study is the first to show that soil nutrients (C and N) can move from donor soils to receiver plants when both are colonized by a single endophytic fungal genet. Although future field tests are needed, several limitations of our controlled experiment complicate interpretation.We lacked full controls for the +\u0026thinsp;E/+I/-R treatment (e.g., -E/-I/-R, -E/+I/-R), so we cannot completely rule out isotope deposition from fungal exudates or necromass. However, this is unlikely because the only difference to the main treatment was the absense of a receiver plant and roots were separated by barriers. For the +\u0026thinsp;E/+I/-R treatment, we relied on \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-labelled amino acids and \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e representative for C and N transfer, but because C and N moved independently, \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC data cannot be used to estimate amino acid-derived \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN dynamics. We also did not include plates without a donor plant to test for donor-independent transfer. Nonetheless, both donor and receiver plants were highly colonized, and the presence of two plants (with or without the receiver plant) altered transfer patterns, indicating that removing the donor would also change resource movement. Still, without a donor-exclusion treatment, we cannot isolate the donor influence. Finally, plant tissue controls for D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO were elevated above natural abundance and similar to fungal treatments, and despite minimizing the timeframe between D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO addition and sampling, this effect remained substantial suggesting an abiotic transfer pathway into plant tissue.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe found evidence for the formation of CENs in supporting transport of soil resources. This opens the possibility of ecologically relevant belowground networks beyond CMNs. The interconnection of concurrent networks by different fungal guilds could form an extensive network providing a multitude of functions, which may be unique across ecosystems where each fungal component plays its distinct role. CFN-RNP could play a central role in those network dynamics and may act similar to compartmentalization in cells, whereby a single fungal species would act like an organelle making an unique contribution to overall functioning. If these networks also form in natural ecosystems, this will reveal an unknown role of endophyte diversity in shaping plant-plant interactions. Future research on CMNs will need to account for the fact that endophytes can also transfer resources from donor side to receiver plants. In conclusion, we propose an unknown role of endophytes in ecosystem functioning which could have important implications for ecosystem management where the current focus concentrates on mycorrhizal fungi.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\n\u003ch3\u003eI. Experimental design\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe experiment was set up in three-way split petri dishes to control for direct plant rootconnection and to facilitate fungal colonization of donor and receiver plants. The plates were constructed from triple-split petri dishes where two 2 cm holes were melted into the lids to allow plant outgrowth. In contrast to earlier approaches for studying CMNs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e], we chose an approach without a mesh barrier. Since all endophytes used in this study overgrow internal barriers of triple-split petri dish plates (Suppl. Figure\u0026nbsp;2), there was no need for mesh to establish barriers to exclude root contact since roots did not come into contact even without mesh and this approach also better allowed us to control for soil water flow. The plates were sterilized by sequential treatment with 5% sodium hypochlorite (30 min), sterile water rinsing, 70% ethanol (15 min), and UV exposure (30 min) in a laminar flow hood. The holes were sealed with parafilm until fungal inoculation to maintain sterility. For plate assembly, Modified Melin Norkans (MMN) agar was poured into one of the three plate compartments to the level of the internal barriers to support hyphal growth into the two soil compartments. The agar compartments were covered with white paper to simulate soil darkness. The plants were transferred with tweezers into a sterile growth substrate consisting of equal parts sand, vermiculite, and potting soil.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne endophyte species was inoculated per plate and the isotopes were exclusively added to the donor side. The experiment consisted of four separate treatments where E\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;endophyte, I\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;isotope, R\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;receiver plant, and \u0026lsquo;+\u0026rsquo; and \u0026lsquo;-\u0026rsquo; refer to the presence or absence of an experimental level, respectively: (1)\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;E/+I/+R, (2)\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;E/+I/-R, (3) -E/+I/+R, (4) -E/-I/+R. Additionally, there were three endophyte species levels, two isotope addition levels (organic and inorganic nitrogen source), and three measured isotopic elements (\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN, \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC, deuterium). The organic versus inorganic N treatments represent the two opposing \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labeled nitrogen sources (ammonium versus amino acids; see below).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the +\u0026thinsp;E/+I/+R treatment, a recipient and a donor plant were inoculated with an endophyte and both isotope treatments (α, \u0026szlig;) (6 replicates per species and per isotope treatment). In the +\u0026thinsp;E/+I/-R treatment, a donor plant was inoculated with an endophyte without a receiver plant and with only one isotope treatment (α) to account for the potential deposit of isotope-containing compounds through fungal exudates and necromass (4 replicates per species). The -E/+I/+R treatment was an isotope control where no endophyte was added but both isotope treatments (α, \u0026szlig;) were included to test for transport mechanisms in the absence of inoculated endophytes (5 replicates per isotope treatment). Finally, the -E/-I/+R treatment served as our natural abundance control without endophytes nor isotopes (10 replicates).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eII. Choice of plant and endophyte species\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe organisms used in this study were \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e (Col-0), \u003cem\u003eT. viride, F. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e (Col-0) seeds were obtained from the Eurasian Arabidopsis Stock Centre (uNASC), an established public research repository. The fungal isolates (\u003cem\u003eTrichoderma viride, Fusarium temperatum, and Mucor hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e) were obtained from MyPilz for research purposes (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://mypilz.eu/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://mypilz.eu/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) and are publicly available for research purposes upon request. Species identification of the fungal isolates were provided by the supplier using DNA metabarcoding. No field collection of plant or fungal material was conducted in this study. As all biological materials were acquired from authorized providers and not collected in situ, no collection permits, geographical coordinates, or wild-origin voucher specimens apply. All materials were used in accordance with institutional, national, and international regulations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. thaliana\u003c/em\u003e seeds were first cold stratified at 4\u0026deg;C for 48 h, sown into a non-sterile potting soil (this was necessary to promote plant growth which was much lower in sterilized potting soil), and after 36 days when plants had an established rosette, plants were then transferred to the plates with inoculated endophytes. The fungal strains were cultivated on MMN agar and hyphae from the growing periphery containing agar plugs (0.5 cm\u0026sup3;) were used for inoculation. While germinating \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e in unsterilized potting soil may allow exogenous fungi to colonize its roots, plants were subsequently transferred into a sterile environment in the plates with high propagule pressure of the inoculated fungus.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e is primarily regarded as a hemibiotrophic pathogen that possesses saprotrophic and parasitic abilities to colonize roots [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. While \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e often acts pathogenically, many can also behave as mutualistic endophytes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], and \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e can colonize Brassicaceae root systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. For \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e, we used the strain MP-PP9 which was isolated from a maize plant infected with \u003cem\u003eUstilago maydis\u003c/em\u003e near Riegersburg, Austria. \u003cem\u003eMucor\u003c/em\u003e species can enhance plant growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e], and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e can specifically promote host plant nutrient uptake and confer protection against pathogens [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e is considered a saprotrophic fungus capable of endophytically colonizing roots [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e] and, being a member of the Mucoromycotina, it can form symbioses with plants similar to mycorrhizae (\u0026lsquo;Mucoromycotina fine root endophytes\u0026rsquo; (MFRE); [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. MFRE have been shown to facilitate direct nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon exchange with a host [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. For \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e, we used the strain MP-304-2-R1 which was isolated from roots in a soil sample near Falkenstein, Austria. Fungi from the genus \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e are considered free-living saprotrophs that can be especially beneficial to plants as endophytes by colonizing their roots, and \u003cem\u003eA. thaliana\u003c/em\u003e has been studied extensively for its responses to \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e can enhance plant growth and confer pathogen protection within \u003cem\u003eA. thaliana\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e]. For \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e, we used the strain MP-206-8 which was isolated from soil near Gutenstein, Austria. In summary, all three species are capable of colonizing plant roots and are expected to follow a continuum of mutualistic effects whereby \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eMucor\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e was introduced to the plates five days before, and \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e four days before plant addition to ensure growth dominance of the inoculated fungi over those potentially carried over from the plant roots from the non-sterile soil (see above). \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e is fast growing but less quickly than \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e. For fungal inoculation, the plates were incubated at 28\u0026deg;C. After plant addition, the plates were incubated in a growth chamber with a constant humidity of 65% for 16 days at 20\u0026deg;C and 300 \u0026micro;mole/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003es light density at day and 15\u0026deg;C and no light at night (12 hours). During the first three days, twelve non-viable plants were replaced with healthy individuals. Watering until moist but not oversaturated with water continued every two days with care taken to avoid cross-contamination between compartments by over-watering. Four plants were removed due to mortality (two from the control and two from inoculation with \u003cem\u003eM. hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eIII. Isotope additions\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIsotopes were added to assess nitrogen, carbon, and water transfer from donor to receiver plant compartments. Four days after plant addition, soil samples from three plates (one per fungal species) were collected for total soil nitrogen analysis to determine how much labelled amino acid to spike into the donor compartment. Total nitrogen was quantified on finely ground soils using dry combustion on an Elemental Analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-IRMS), which was also used to quantify isotope enrichment (see below). This was used to estimate total amino acid content in the soil assuming amino acids are ca. 33% of the total N content [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e], [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e]. We also measured ammonium content using a modified Berthelot reaction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e] from 2M KCl extractions (5 g soil, 20 mL KCl). We then added labelled substrates corresponding in amount to only 1% of the already present soil pools to avoid a fertilization effect. Isotopic treatments α (\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC-amino acid mixture and \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eNH₄) and β (\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-amino acid mixture) were applied to the donor plants after 16 days of plant growth.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe used highly enriched substrates, including ammonium-\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e sulfate (99 atom % \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN) and 98% \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC/\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN atom content mixed amino acids extracted from algae (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories ALGAL AMINO ACID MIXTURE). To minimize exchange of deuterium in the water, the deuterium (D) treatment was applied for both isotope treatments only 48h before sampling (after 22 days) by adding 400 \u0026micro;l 20% D\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO (99 atom % D). We used isotopically labelled amino acids, ammonium, and water to test different transfer outcomes among CFNs. We added both \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC- and \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-labelled amino acids to assess whether endophytes may also transfer carbon from amino acids (versus just N), and we added \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-NH₄ to assess transport of nitrogen from an inorganic versus organic source.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIV. Sampling and analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSampling was conducted 24 days after plant transfer to inoculation plates. Plants were removed from the plates and separated into above and belowground parts. Leaves and shoots (hereafter: \u0026ldquo;plant\u0026rdquo;; we only used above-ground plant parts as we cannot differentiate isotope uptake into plant versus fungal tissues in and around the roots) and soils were dried at 60\u0026deg;C for 72 h and ground for analysis on an elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (EA-IRMS) to determine isotopic incorporation into aboveground tissues and transfer into soils. The roots were stained with trypan blue to assess fungal colonization using the grid-intersection method (McGonigle et al., 1990). A light microscope was used to evaluate colonization at 40x magnification by dividing roots into 50 sections and scoring the presence or absence of hyphae.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eV. Statistical analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll statistical analyses were conducted in R (v4.3.1), and significance was set to \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05. ANOVAs (aov function), F-tests (var.test function), t-tests (t.test function), and Pearson correlations (cor.test function) from base R were used for the analyses. For the isotope addition treatments, we first tested whether the isotope control and natural abundance control treatments differed to evaluate potential non-fungal mediated resource transfer. We tested whether variance was equal between the samples using F-tests and then used two-sided Welch\u0026rsquo;s t-tests if the variance was unequal (setting var.equal\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;FALSE) and two-sided Student\u0026rsquo;s t-tests if the variance was equal. If the isotope and natural abundance controls differed, then we then tested for differences among fungal treatments against both controls. If the controls did not differ, we compared fungal differences to the natural abundance control. To test this, we used ANOVA and calculated type III sums of squares. Normality of the residuals was inspected, and when necessary, the data was log transformed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests (kruskal.test function) were used as a non-parametric alternative when the log-transformed model residuals were not normally distributed or when a log transformation was not possible due to negative values, such as observed for foliar δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC. To test whether individual fungal treatments increased isotope values relative to the control and for the physiological analyses, we first tested whether the variance of samples was equal using F-tests, and we then used one-sided Welch\u0026rsquo;s t-tests for samples with unequal variance and one-sided Student\u0026rsquo;s t-tests for samples with equal variances.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eConceptualization: M.A.A., P.W.; Analysis: P.W., M.A.A.; Investigation: P.W., M.A.A., P.S., A.G., M.S.; Resources: M.A.A.; Writing a First draft: P.W.; Reviewing and Editing: All authors; Supervision: M.A.A., P.S.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by a Vienna Science and Technology Fund VRG awarded to M.A. (VRG22-007).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll analysis scripts and data are accessible in the following repository:https://gitlab.com/fungalecology/cen\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBahram, M. \u0026amp; Netherway, T. Fungi as mediators linking organisms and ecosystems, \u003cem\u003eFEMS Microbiol. Rev.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 46, no. 2, p. fuab058, Mar. (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/femsre/fuab058\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/femsre/fuab058\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrundrett, M. C. \u0026amp; Tedersoo, L. Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity, \u003cem\u003eNew Phytol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 220, no. 4, pp. 1108\u0026ndash;1115, Dec. (2018). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/nph.14976\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nph.14976\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuotsalainen, A. L. et al. Dark septate endophytes: mutualism from by-products? \u003cem\u003eTrends Plant Sci.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 247\u0026ndash;254, Mar. (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan Der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M. \u0026amp; Sanders, I. R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future, \u003cem\u003eNew Phytol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 1406\u0026ndash;1423, Mar. (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/nph.13288\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nph.13288\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKarst, J., Jones, M. D. \u0026amp; Hoeksema, J. D. Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests, \u003cem\u003eNat. Ecol. Evol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 501\u0026ndash;511, Feb. (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSimard, S. W. \u0026amp; Durall, D. M. Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance, \u003cem\u003eCan. J. Bot.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1140\u0026ndash;1165, Aug. (2004). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1139/b04-116\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1139/b04-116\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeiler, K. J., Durall, D. M., Simard, S. W., Maxwell, S. A. \u0026amp; Kretzer, A. M. Architecture of the wood-wide web: \u003cem\u003eRhizopogon\u003c/em\u003e spp. genets link multiple Douglas‐fir cohorts. \u003cem\u003eNew. Phytol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e185\u003c/b\u003e (2), 543\u0026ndash;553. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03069.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03069.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Jan. 2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlein, T., Siegwolf, R. T. W. \u0026amp; K\u0026ouml;rner, C. Belowground carbon trade among tall trees in a temperate forest. \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e352\u003c/b\u003e, 342\u0026ndash;344. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.aad6188\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.aad6188\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Apr. 2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong, Y. Y., Simard, S. W., Carroll, A., Mohn, W. W. \u0026amp; Zeng, R. S. Defoliation of interior Douglas-fir elicits carbon transfer and stress signalling to ponderosa pine neighbors through ectomycorrhizal networks. \u003cem\u003eSci. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e5\u003c/b\u003e (1), 8495. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/srep08495\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/srep08495\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Feb. 2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWarren, J. M., Brooks, J. R., Meinzer, F. C. \u0026amp; Eberhart, J. L. Hydraulic redistribution of water from \u003cem\u003ePinus ponderosa\u003c/em\u003e trees to seedlings: evidence for an ectomycorrhizal pathway, \u003cem\u003eNew Phytol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 382\u0026ndash;394, Apr. (2008). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02377.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02377.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlam, B. et al. Endophytic Fungi: From Symbiosis to Secondary Metabolite Communications or Vice Versa? \u003cem\u003eFront. Plant. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, 791033. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2021.791033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2021.791033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Dec. 2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnthony, M. A. et al. Fungal community composition predicts forest carbon storage at a continental scale. \u003cem\u003eNat. Commun.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e15\u003c/b\u003e (1), 2385. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-024-46792-w\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-024-46792-w\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Mar. 2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrundrett, M. C. Understanding the Roles of Multifunctional Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi, in Microbial Root Endophytes, (eds Schulz, B. J. E., Boyle, C. J. C. \u0026amp; Sieber, T. N.) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 281\u0026ndash;298. doi: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/3-540-33526-9_16\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/3-540-33526-9_16\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePoveda, J., Eugui, D., Abril-Ur\u0026iacute;as, P. \u0026amp; Velasco, P. Endophytic fungi as direct plant growth promoters for sustainable agricultural production. \u003cem\u003eSymbiosis\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e85\u003c/b\u003e (1), 1\u0026ndash;19. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s13199-021-00789-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s13199-021-00789-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Sept. 2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRillig, M. C., Lehmann, A., Mounts, I. R. \u0026amp; Bock, B. M. Concurrent common fungal networks formed by different guilds of fungi, \u003cem\u003eNew Phytol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 33\u0026ndash;38, Apr. (2025). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/nph.20418\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nph.20418\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiao, C. et al. Challenges and update on fungal endophytes: classification, definition, diversity, ecology, evolution and functions. \u003cem\u003eFungal Divers.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e131\u003c/b\u003e (1), 301\u0026ndash;367. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s13225-025-00550-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s13225-025-00550-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Mar. 2025).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNewsham, K. K. A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. \u003cem\u003eNew. Phytol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e190\u003c/b\u003e (3), 783\u0026ndash;793. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (May 2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFesel, P. H. \u0026amp; Zuccaro, A. Dissecting endophytic lifestyle along the parasitism/mutualism continuum in Arabidopsis. \u003cem\u003eCurr. Opin. Microbiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e32\u003c/b\u003e, 103\u0026ndash;112. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.008\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Aug. 2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRodriguez, R. J., White, J. F. Jr, Arnold, A. E. \u0026amp; Redman, R. S. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. \u003cem\u003eNew. Phytol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e182\u003c/b\u003e (2), 314\u0026ndash;330. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Apr. 2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStone, P. \u0026amp; White, E. \u003cem\u003eUnpublished\u003c/em\u003e. (2004). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.13140/RG.2.1.2497.0726\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.13140/RG.2.1.2497.0726\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBock, B. M., Hoeksema, J. D., Johnson, N. C. \u0026amp; Gehring, C. A. Evidence for common fungal networks among plants formed by a Dark Septate Endophyte in Sorghum bicolor. \u003cem\u003eCommun. Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e (1), 996. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s42003-025-08432-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s42003-025-08432-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (July 2025).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSimard, S. et al. Resource Transfer Between Plants Through Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Networks, in \u003cem\u003eMycorrhizal Networks\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 224, T. R. Horton, Ed., in Ecological Studies, vol. 224., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 133\u0026ndash;176. (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlmario, J., Fabiańska, I., Saridis, G. \u0026amp; Bucher, M. Unearthing the plant\u0026ndash;microbe \u003cem\u003equid pro quo\u003c/em\u003e in root associations with beneficial fungi. \u003cem\u003eNew. Phytol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e234\u003c/b\u003e (6), 1967\u0026ndash;1976. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/nph.18061\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nph.18061\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (June 2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarc\u0026iacute;a, E., Alonso, \u0026Aacute;., Platas, G. \u0026amp; Sacrist\u0026aacute;n, S. The endophytic mycobiota of Arabidopsis thaliana. \u003cem\u003eFungal Divers.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e60\u003c/b\u003e (1), 71\u0026ndash;89. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s13225-012-0219-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s13225-012-0219-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (May 2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMandyam, K. G., Roe, J. \u0026amp; Jumpponen, A. Arabidopsis thaliana model system reveals a continuum of responses to root endophyte colonization. \u003cem\u003eFungal Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e117\u003c/b\u003e (4), 250\u0026ndash;260. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.funbio.2013.02.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.funbio.2013.02.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Apr. 2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMandyam, K. G. \u0026amp; Jumpponen, A. Mutualism\u0026acirc;\u0026euro;parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. \u003cem\u003eFront. Microbiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e5\u003c/b\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Jan. 2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRather, R. A. Shaping Plant Growth Beneath the Soil: A Theoretical Exploration of Fungal Endophyte\u0026rsquo;s Role as Plant Growth-Promoting Agents. \u003cem\u003eMicrobiologyOpen\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e (4), e70026. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/mbo3.70026\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/mbo3.70026\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Aug. 2025).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrina, A. S., Gagkaeva, T. Y. \u0026amp; Gavrilova, O. P. Novel cruciferous plant host of Fusarium temperatum, a species mainly associated with maize. \u003cem\u003eAustralas Plant. Dis. Notes\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e18\u003c/b\u003e (1), 37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s13314-023-00523-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s13314-023-00523-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Nov. 2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePfordt, A. et al. Oct., Occurrence, Pathogenicity, and Mycotoxin Production of Fusarium temperatum in Relation to Other Fusarium Species on Maize in Germany, \u003cem\u003ePathogens\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 864, (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/pathogens9110864\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/pathogens9110864\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobles-Barrios, F. et al. Jan., \u003cem\u003eFusarium temperatum\u003c/em\u003e shows a hemibiotrophic infection process and differential pathogenicity over different maize breeds from Mexico, \u003cem\u003eJ. Phytopathol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 21\u0026ndash;33, (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/jph.13052\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jph.13052\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchulz, B. \u0026amp; Boyle, C. The endophytic continuum. \u003cem\u003eMycol. Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e109\u003c/b\u003e (6), 661\u0026ndash;686. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/S095375620500273X\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/S095375620500273X\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (June 2005).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRousk, J. \u0026amp; B\u0026aring;\u0026aring;th, E. Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil: Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil. \u003cem\u003eFEMS Microbiol. Ecol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e78\u003c/b\u003e (1), 17\u0026ndash;30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01106.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01106.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Oct. 2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuo, K., Sui, Y., Li, Z., Huang, Y. \u0026amp; Zhang, H. Trichoderma viride Tv-1511 Colonizes Arabidopsis Leaves and Promotes Arabidopsis Growth by Modulating the MAP Kinase 6-Mediated Activation of Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase, \u003cem\u003eJ. Plant Growth Regul.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1261\u0026ndash;1276, Sept. (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00344-019-10063-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00344-019-10063-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHung, R., Lee, S. \u0026amp; Bennett, J. W. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for testing the effect of Trichoderma volatile organic compounds. \u003cem\u003eFungal Ecol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e (1), 19\u0026ndash;26. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.funeco.2012.09.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.funeco.2012.09.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Feb. 2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKohler, A. et al. Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. \u003cem\u003eNat. Genet.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e47\u003c/b\u003e (4), 410\u0026ndash;415 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHe, X., Xu, M., Qiu, G. Y. \u0026amp; Zhou, J. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants, \u003cem\u003eJ. Plant Ecol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107\u0026ndash;118, Sept. (2009). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/jpe/rtp015\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jpe/rtp015\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoeksema, J. D. Experimentally Testing Effects of Mycorrhizal Networks on Plant-Plant Interactions and Distinguishing Among Mechanisms, in \u003cem\u003eMycorrhizal Networks\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 224, T. R. Horton, Ed., in Ecological Studies, vol. 224., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 255\u0026ndash;277. (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuldau, G. A. \u0026amp; Yates, I. E. Evidence for Fusarium endophytes, \u003cem\u003eMicrob. Endophytes\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 85, Accessed: Nov. 07, 2025. [Online]. (2000). Available: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://books.google.com/books?hl=en\u0026amp;lr=\u0026amp;id=o0dZDwAAQBAJ\u0026amp;oi=fnd\u0026amp;pg=PA85\u0026amp;dq=Kuldau,+Gretchen+A.,+and+Ida+E.+Yates.+ %22Evidence+for+Fusarium+endophytes.%22+Microbial+endophytes+85+(2000)\u0026amp;ots=ovX4Z10xI2\u0026amp;sig=5ub-J_Xys_jzeAEMXgqnOgadVJ8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://books.google.com/books?hl=en\u0026amp;lr=\u0026amp;id=o0dZDwAAQBAJ\u0026amp;oi=fnd\u0026amp;pg=PA85\u0026amp;dq=Kuldau,+Gretchen+A.,+and+Ida+E.+Yates.+ %22Evidence+for+Fusarium+endophytes.%22+Microbial+endophytes+85+(2000)\u0026amp;ots=ovX4Z10xI2\u0026amp;sig=5ub-J_Xys_jzeAEMXgqnOgadVJ8\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRozpądek, P. et al. The Role of Strigolactone in the Cross-Talk Between Arabidopsis thaliana and the Endophytic Fungus Mucor sp. \u003cem\u003eFront. Microbiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e, 441. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2018.00441\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2018.00441\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Mar. 2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRozpądek, P. et al. How does the endophytic fungus Mucor sp. improve Arabidopsis arenosa vegetation in the degraded environment of a mine dump? \u003cem\u003eEnviron. Exp. Bot.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e147\u003c/b\u003e, 31\u0026ndash;42. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.009\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.009\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Mar. 2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarc\u0026iacute;a-Latorre, C., Rodrigo, S. \u0026amp; Santamaria, O. Effect of fungal endophytes on plant growth and nutrient uptake in Trifolium subterraneum and Poa pratensis as affected by plant host specificity, \u003cem\u003eMycol. Prog.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1217\u0026ndash;1231, Sept. (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11557-021-01732-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11557-021-01732-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZiedan, E. S. H. E., Farrag, E. S. H. \u0026amp; Sahab, A. F. First record and preliminary evaluation of \u003cem\u003eMucor hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e as biocontrol agent on inflorescence brown rot incidence of date palm, \u003cem\u003eArch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 617\u0026ndash;626, Mar. (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/03235408.2012.749695\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/03235408.2012.749695\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe Boer, W. et al. Antifungal Rhizosphere Bacteria Can increase as Response to the Presence of Saprotrophic Fungi. \u003cem\u003ePLOS ONE\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e (9), e0137988. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.pone.0137988\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0137988\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Sept. 2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRungjindamai, N. \u0026amp; Jones, E. B. G. Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review. \u003cem\u003eJ. Fungi\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e (1), 67. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/jof10010067\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/jof10010067\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Jan. 2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eField, K. J. et al. Functional analysis of liverworts in dual symbiosis with Glomeromycota and Mucoromycotina fungi under a simulated Palaeozoic CO2 decline. \u003cem\u003eISME J.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e (6), 1514\u0026ndash;1526. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/ismej.2015.204\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/ismej.2015.204\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (June 2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoysted, G. A. et al. Mucoromycotina Fine Root Endophyte Fungi Form Nutritional Mutualisms with Vascular Plants. \u003cem\u003ePlant. Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e181\u003c/b\u003e (2), 565\u0026ndash;577. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1104/pp.19.00729\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1104/pp.19.00729\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Oct. 2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoysted, G. A. et al. Direct nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon exchanges between Mucoromycotina \u0026lsquo;fine root endophyte\u0026rsquo; fungi and a flowering plant in novel monoxenic cultures, \u003cem\u003eNew Phytol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 70\u0026ndash;79, Apr. (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/nph.18630\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nph.18630\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlonso-Ram\u0026iacute;rez, A. et al. Salicylic acid prevents \u003cem\u003eT richoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e from entering the vascular system of roots, \u003cem\u003eMol. Plant Pathol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 823\u0026ndash;831, Oct. (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/mpp.12141\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mpp.12141\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrotman, Y. et al. Trichoderma-Plant Root Colonization: Escaping Early Plant Defense Responses and Activation of the Antioxidant Machinery for Saline Stress Tolerance. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Pathog\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e (3), e1003221. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.ppat.1003221\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.ppat.1003221\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Mar. 2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eContreras-Cornejo, H. A., Mac\u0026iacute;as-Rodr\u0026iacute;guez, L., Cort\u0026eacute;s-Penagos, C. \u0026amp; L\u0026oacute;pez-Bucio, J. \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma virens\u003c/em\u003e, a Plant Beneficial Fungus, Enhances Biomass Production and Promotes Lateral Root Growth through an Auxin-Dependent Mechanism in Arabidopsis, \u003cem\u003ePlant Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 1579\u0026ndash;1592, Mar. (2009). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1104/pp.108.130369\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1104/pp.108.130369\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJalali, F., Zafari, D. \u0026amp; Salari, H. Volatile organic compounds of some Trichoderma spp. increase growth and induce salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. \u003cem\u003eFungal Ecol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e29\u003c/b\u003e, 67\u0026ndash;75. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.funeco.2017.06.007\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.funeco.2017.06.007\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Oct. 2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMor\u0026aacute;n-Diez, E. et al. Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24 h incubation with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. \u003cem\u003eJ. Plant. Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e169\u003c/b\u003e (6), 614\u0026ndash;620. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Apr. 2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarstecka, Z. et al. Trichoderma viride Colonizes the Roots of Brassica napus L., Alters the Expression of Stress-Responsive Genes, and Increases the Yield of Canola under Field Conditions during Drought. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Mol. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e24\u003c/b\u003e (20), 15349. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/ijms242015349\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijms242015349\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Oct. 2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuna-Hern\u0026aacute;ndez, L. E., Huerta-Palacios, G., Holgu\u0026iacute;n-Mel\u0026eacute;ndez, F. \u0026amp; Guill\u0026eacute;n-Navarro, K. Root colonisation and induction of plant defence-associated signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana by Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces galilaeus, and Trichoderma viride, July 18, 2025, \u003cem\u003eIn Review\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.21203/rs.3.rs-7125135/v1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7125135/v1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFriedel, J. K. \u0026amp; Scheller, E. Composition of hydrolysable amino acids in soil organic matter and soil microbial biomass, \u003cem\u003eSoil Biol. Biochem.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 315\u0026ndash;325, Mar. (2002). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00185-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00185-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoh, K. M. \u0026amp; Edmeades, D. C. Distribution and partial characterisation of acid hydrolysable organic nitrogen in six New Zealand soils. \u003cem\u003eSoil. Biol. Biochem.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e (2), 127\u0026ndash;132. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/0038-0717(79)90088-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/0038-0717(79)90088-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Jan. 1979).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoutermans, M. et al. Nov., Nitrogen sequestration under long-term paddy management in soils developed on contrasting parent material, \u003cem\u003eBiol. Fertil. Soils\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 837\u0026ndash;848, (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00374-017-1223-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-017-1223-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSenwo, Z. N. \u0026amp; Tabatabai, M. A. Amino acid composition of soil organic matter, \u003cem\u003eBiol. Fertil. Soils\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 235\u0026ndash;242, Feb. (1998). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s003740050373\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s003740050373\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVergara, C. et al. Contribution of dark septate fungi to the nutrient uptake and growth of rice plants. \u003cem\u003eBraz J. Microbiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e49\u003c/b\u003e (1), 67\u0026ndash;78. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.010\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.010\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (Jan. 2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBraman, R. S. \u0026amp; Hendrix, S. A. Nanogram nitrite and nitrate determination in environmental and biological materials by vanadium(III) reduction with chemiluminescence detection, \u003cem\u003eAnal. Chem.\u003c/em\u003e, vol. 61, no. 24, pp. 2715\u0026ndash;2718, Dec. (1989). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1021/ac00199a007\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/ac00199a007\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcGONIGLE, T. P., Miller, M. H., Evans, D. G., Fairchild, G. L. \u0026amp; Swan, J. A. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular\u0026mdash;arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. \u003cem\u003eNew. Phytol\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e115\u003c/b\u003e (3), 495\u0026ndash;501. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (July 1990).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"fungi, Trichoderma, common mycorrhizal networks, Fusarium, Mucor, common fungal networks","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFungal symbionts play essential roles in ecosystems influencing plant development and biodiversity. Mycorrhizal fungi can form common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) where a fungus connects the roots of at least two plants via continuous extraradical mycelium and transfers resources such as nitrogen and carbon. In addition to mycorrhizal fungi, there is another group of fungal mutualists known as endophytes. They also support plant development and may form common endophyte networks (CENs). Whether endophytes can transfer soil resources like nitrogen, carbon, and water through such networks remains an open question. To test this, we established a CEN experiment in split petri dishes involving \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e hosts and three phylogenetically diverse endophytes (\u003cem\u003eTrichoderma viride\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eMucor hiemalis\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eFusarium temperatum\u003c/em\u003e) to test whether transfer of isotopically labelled amino acid \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003enitrogen (N), amino acid \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003ecarbon, \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN-ammonium, or deuterated water can be transferred by donor to receiver plants connected via CENs. We show that the tested endophytes can form CENs and transfer growth limiting resources from donor plant soil to receiver plant tissues. \u003cem\u003eF. temperatum\u003c/em\u003e boosted plant growth by 38% relative to the uninoculated control, and it enriched plant \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003eN content derived from amino acids by 55%. Surprisingly, we also observed amino acid-derived \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003ecarbon transport from donor plant soil to receiver plant tissues by \u003cem\u003eT. viride\u003c/em\u003e (+\u0026thinsp;2.83% \u0026gt; control). We also demonstrate that soil resource transfer by all three endophytes shifted in the presence of two versus a single host plant even when root systems were physically separated to avoid competition, underscoring that endophytic functioning, not just that of plants, also shifts when CENs are formed. Our results demonstrate that non-mycorrhizal fungi, like endophytes, can form networks similar to the idea of CMNs and transfer plant growth relevant resources. Endophytes display a broad array of symbiotic functions with their hosts, and formation of CENs may be a newly discovered component of their symbiotic tool kit.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Evidence for resource transfer via common endophyte networks","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-19 11:06:33","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8288489/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-01-28T16:59:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-01-06T18:06:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-01-04T17:05:32+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"156560736173324320954520114985737386774","date":"2025-12-20T17:16:34+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"87363936919682542520849368678429285534","date":"2025-12-18T11:27:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"149074728726890255134799917952709525901","date":"2025-12-17T11:59:22+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-12-17T06:06:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-12-17T06:03:35+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-12-17T02:33:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-12-09T11:34:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-12-09T11:26:47+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"db3eeae9-dbec-4256-a6de-7c505fe8acc3","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 19th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":59883931,"name":"Biological sciences/Ecology"},{"id":59883932,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Ecology"},{"id":59883933,"name":"Biological sciences/Microbiology"},{"id":59883934,"name":"Biological sciences/Plant sciences"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-08T07:26:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-19 11:06:33","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8288489","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8288489","identity":"rs-8288489","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}