In silico restriction site analysis of whole genome sequences shows patterns caused by selection and sequence duplications

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 1,190 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Biological sequences are known to be not random. Thus, the comparison of in silico restriction fragment distributions of random and biological sequences may be an indicator of this non-randomness. Our analyses show that for most of the tested combinations of restriction enzyme and genome sequence the fragments per Megabase of the biological sequence deviate at least more then 10% from the corresponding random sequence. This deviation goes into both directions, i.e. clearly increased values are as common as clearly decreased values. Although there is no species- or restriction-enzyme-specific effect, a clear impact of the GC content both of the restriction site and of the genome sequence can be seen. In contrast to the random sequences, the genome sequences show distinct peaks in their fragment length distributions, hinting to repetitive elements such as transposons. Competing Interest Statement Lucia Vedder reports financial support was provided by Ark Biodiversity GmbH, Willdenowstr. 6, 12203 Berlin, Germany. Heiko Schoof declares no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0