A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 86,373 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer Andrew S. Urquhart , Samuel O’Donnell , Emile Gluck-Thaler , Aaron A. Vogan doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640899 Andrew S. Urquhart 1 School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, 3010, Australia 2 Systematic Biology, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University , Uppsala, 752 36, Sweden Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: andrew.urquhart{at}unimelb.edu.au Samuel O’Donnell 3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI 53706, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Emile Gluck-Thaler 3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI 53706, USA 4 Wisconsin Institute for Discovery , Madison, WI 53706, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Aaron A. Vogan 2 Systematic Biology, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University , Uppsala, 752 36, Sweden Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Summary Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is an important and potentially frequent process impacting the evolutionary trajectory of eukaryotic species. Yet to date, the mechanism of HGT among eukaryotes has remained a mystery. Here, we demonstrate that Starships , a newly discovered group of cargo-mobilizing transposable elements, are active vectors of horizontally transferred DNA among eukaryotic species. We find that multiple Starships simultaneously transfer themselves and their cargo within and between fungal genera separated by upwards of 100 million years of evolution. Transferred Starships are recovered in strains with and without selection for particular Starship -encoded phenotypes. Using whole genome sequencing, we exclude alternative hypotheses such as heterokaryosis, parasex or the random uptake of exogenous DNA by showing that only Starship DNA is precisely transferred. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the introduction of the Hephaestus Starship into a new species increases metal resistance due to the genes carried by this element. Between 18-27% of all Starships in our focal genus, Paecilomyces, have evidence of horizontal transfer under natural conditions, including to other fungal genera, revealing Starship -mediated HGT to be a widespread and frequent phenomenon across filamentous fungi. This study identifies the first active genetic mechanism for HGT between eukaryotic species. Introduction HGT is a consequential means of genetic exchange predicted to occur between eukaryotes, but the mystery of how it happens across this domain of life has remained unsolved for decades. Unlike vertical inheritance, HGT involves the transfer of DNA between individuals in the absence of sex. Advances in sequencing coupled with comparative genomics have revealed many strong cases of HGT across a wide range of eukaryotes [ 1 – 3 ]. For example, an antifreeze-encoding protein gene was horizontally transferred between two fish [ 4 ], while a gene required to detoxify plant defence compounds was obtained by a whitefly from plants [ 5 – 7 ]. Yet while we often conclude that HGT has happened, and sometimes identify plausible adaptive explanations for why it may have happened, we almost never know how it happened [ 8 ]. Thus, we have limited insight into how the movement of genetic material across eukaryotic species is achieved and few opportunities to study the biology of eukaryotic HGT under laboratory settings. Fungi are ideal model systems for investigating eukaryotic HGT due to their tractability and the impetus to study them for their societal and environmental importance. Because fungal interactions with both plants and animals pose threats and opportunities for food security and public health, understanding how fungi adapt to new hosts and environments is an ecological and economic priority [ 9 ]. One major reason to be concerned about fungal HGT is that it provides major adaptive gains (e.g. acquisition of a new virulence factor) with a single mutational event [ 10 ]. This has led to the emergence of new pathogens of both plants and animals like Metarhizium robertsii, an insect pathogen whose shift to pathogenicity was facilitated by HGT [ 11 ]. The first identified examples of putative fungal HGTs were likely acquisitions of bacterial genes whose evolutionary histories clearly differ from the surrounding genome [ 12 ]. More recently, a growing number of genes transferred between fungi have been identified through comparative genomics and phylogenetics [ 13 , 14 ]. Notable examples include the toxA virulence gene whose transfer resulted in the emergence of a new wheat pathogen [ 15 ], the transfer of multiple Fusarium virulence factors [ 16 ], and the transfer of the sterigmatocystin biosynthetic gene cluster which resulted in the de novo gain of an entire secondary metabolite pathway [ 17 ]. However, as with other eukaryotes, interspecies DNA transfers among fungi lack a mechanism, precluding a basic understanding of HGT biology. One striking feature about fungal HGT is that not only is there phylogenetic evidence of individual genes having transferred, but entire genomic regions spanning hundreds of kilobases [ 18 ]. One untested hypothesis to explain these data is that transposable elements carrying large amounts of sequence as cargo are vectors of eukaryote-eukaryote HGT [ 19 ]. This hypothesis is supported by the striking distribution of near identical massive transposons across different fungal species [ 20 – 22 ]. These transposons, which we have named Starships, are a recently discovered group of transposable elements found in filamentous Ascomycete fungi ( Pezizomycotina ), a large group of ecologically diverse fungi consisting of more than 82,000 described species [ 21 – 23 ]. Starships are mobilised by a tyrosine recombinase, the “captain”, which is always found as the first gene in the element [ 21 ]. Starships possess an unprecedented capacity among eukaryotic DNA elements to carry additional genetic cargo that encode organismal phenotypes beyond transposition-related functions [ 24 ]. There are a growing number of Starships in taxonomically diverse species spanning the Pezizomycotina for which genomic evidence indicates past movement through horizontal transfer [ 21 , 24 – 28 ]. As one example, a set of Starships carrying a cluster of genes providing resistance to formaldehyde appear to have been transferred at least nine times among different fungal species [ 29 ]. While mechanisms of DNA exchange are well established in the bacterial domain, a decisive explanation for how DNA moves horizontally among eukaryotes is missing [ 8 , 30 , 31 ]. Here, we show that Starship transposons transfer between species from the same and different genera under simple co-culture conditions. We rule out alternative explanations of heterokaryosis, introgression, random DNA uptake, and parasexuality through a combination of selective culturing methods and whole genome sequencing of recipients. We leveraged a large genomic dataset and found that at minimum 18-27% of all Starships in our genus of focus, Paecilomyces , have undergone at least one inter-species transfer, underscoring the prevalence and incidence of Starship- mediated HGT in natural environments. Thus, we demonstrate that Starships are a mode of genetic exchange in fungi, and provide the first active mechanism of inter-eukaryotic HGT. Results The Starship transposon Hephaestus is horizontally transferred within and between species One of the strongest cases for eukaryote-eukaryote HGT is the repeated transfer of the Hephaestus Starship [ 25 ]. Hephaestus is a large transposon belonging to the Starship superfamily that carries resistance to multiple metal ions, first identified in the environmental fungus Paecilomyces variotii [ 25 ]. Near-identical copies of Hephaestus are present in two other Paecilomyces species, P. paravariotii [ 32 ] and P. lecythidis [ 21 ], and in another genus, Penicillium chermesium [ 29 ]. However, in the absence of experimental evidence, alternative explanations remain for why identical copies of this transposon are found in different species. For example, it has been suggested that apparent Starship -mediated HGTs might result from hybridisation followed by the subsequent loss of non- Starship DNA [ 33 ]. Given that Hephaestus is predicted to have undergone multiple horizontal gene transfers, it represents the ideal candidate for testing the hypothesis that Starships are a previously hidden mechanism of eukaryotic HGT. We tested whether the horizontal transfer of Hephaestus occurs under lab conditions ( Figure 1A ). First, we tagged Hephaestus with a hygromycin resistance gene in a leucine auxotroph background of P. variotii CBS 144490 [ 34 ]. This resulted in a strain, hereafter the “donor strain”, resistant to hygromycin but auxotrophic for leucine i.e. unable to grow in the absence of supplemental leucine. Thus, when paired to a wild type “acceptor strain” sensitive to hygromycin but prototrophic for leucine, the predicted result of a successful Starship transfer would be a hygromycin-resistant and leucine-prototrophic “recipient strain”. We co-cultured the donor strain with three different acceptor strains of increasing phylogenetic distance. The three acceptor strains used were wild type isogenic P. variotii CBS 144490 (same species), P. paravariotii FRR 5287 (different species, which has a previously inferred horizontal transfer of the Hephaestus Starship [ 32 ]), and a strain belonging to a different genus Aspergillus fumigatus A1160. All acceptor strains are leucine-prototrophic and sensitive to hygromycin ( Figure 1B ). We obtained multiple hygromycin-resistant recipient strains for each strain pairing ( Figure 1B ). In total 138 pairings were made, and of these 10/16 (62.5%) of the P. variotii CBS 144490, 95/98 (96.9%) of the P. paravariotii FRR 5287 and 4/24 (16.7%) of the A. fumigatus A1160 pairings resulted in recipient colonies with the predicted phenotypes indicative of Starship -mediated horizontal transfer ( Table S1 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1: Horizontal transfer of the Hephaestus Starship across species and genera. A) An experimental screen for Starship -mediated HGT reveals the simultaneous transfer of both engineered and naturally occuring adaptive phenotypes. A genetically-modified “donor” strain was constructed to carry a hygromycin antibiotic resistance gene (hygR) on the Hephaestus Starship and additionally to be unable to grow in the absence of the amino acid leucine (auxotroph). Horizontal gene transfer of the Starship enables the recipient to grow in the presence of hygromycin. In addition to carrying the introduced antibiotic resistance Hephaestus naturally contains a number of genes involved in metal tolerance. Abbreviations Hyg = hygromycin, leu = leucine, LeuA KO = deletion of the leuA gene required for leucine biosynthesis. B) Gain of antibiotic resistance following acquisition of hygR-tagged Hephaestus . Growth of donor, acceptor and recipient strains on minimal media with and without leucine and hygromycin. C) Gain of Cu 2+ , Cd 2+ and Zn 2+ resistance by A. fumigatus following acquisition of hygR-tagged Hephaestus . The inter-genus transfer of Hephaestus from Paecilomyces to Aspergillus increases metal resistance One of the features that make Starships distinct from other eukaryotic transposons is that they transfer large segments of protein-coding DNA in a single event (typically dozens of genes spanning as much as 700 kb, but more commonly ∼100 kb [ 35 ]), which provides an opportunity for recipients to simultaneously acquire multiple adaptive phenotypes [ 24 ]. Hephaestus provides resistance to at least five different metal ions, raising the question of whether these different phenotypes would still be expressed after a bona fide transfer to a species in a different genus [ 25 ]. Of the three acceptors we used, P. variotii CBS144490 and P. paravariotii FRR 5287 already have a native copy of Hephaestus whereas A. fumigatus A1160 does not. As such, the effect of acquiring Hephaestus on metal resistance was assessed in the A. fumigatus recipients. Indeed, we found that the de novo acquisition of Hephaestus by A. fumigatus increases resistance to the three metal ions that we tested (Cd 2+ , Zn 2+ , Cu 2+ ; Figure 1C ). The expression of multiple metal resistance phenotypes with native promoters and an engineered antibiotic resistance phenotype in recipient strains supports the conclusion that Starships have capacity to make complex contributions to fungal phenotypes and are drivers of multivariate adaptation across fungal genera. Whole genome sequencing confirms the stable integration of Hephaestus post-transfer The increased hygromycin resistance phenotype of the recipient colonies suggests these strains now carry the hygR-tagged Hephaestus Starship acquired from the donor. To confirm that hygromycin resistance was indeed conferred by the horizontal transfer of Hephaestus , we used whole genome Illumina shotgun sequencing of the recipients in our co-cultivation experiments. Both P. variotii CBS 144490 and P. paravariotii FRR 5287 have a native-copy of Hephaestus so the expected result of a Starship -mediated HGT into these strains is for Hephaestus copy number to increase from 1 to 2 and for this second copy to be located at a different position in the genome compared to both the donor and recipient. In most cases we saw an approximate doubling of the read depth across Hephaestus relative to the genome as anticipated ( Figure 2A ). However, in two cases where P. variotii CBS 144490 was the acceptor strain, Hephaestus appeared in 3 copies in the recipient indicating that 2 copies of Hephaestus had been transferred and subsequently integrated into the genome ( Figure 2A , Figure S1 ; Table S2 ). Similarly, with an A. fumigatus A1160 acceptor (which possesses no native copies of Hephaestus ), Hephaestus went from 0 copies to either 1 to 2 copies ( Figure 2A , Figure S1 ; Table S2 ). De novo genome assembly of the two A. fumigatus recipients that had obtained the Starship indicated that Hephaestus is newly embedded within their genomes. Thus unambiguously connecting the antibiotic and heavy metal resistance phenotypes with the transfer of Hephaestus ( Figure 2B , Figure S2 ). As expected, with few exceptions, native copies of Hephaestus were maintained at their original locus while transferred copies integrated into new insertion sites with the canonical TTAC(N7)A motif ( Figure 2C and D , Figure S3 , see supplemental results “ Hephaestus is integrated into the genome following HGT” ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2: Genome sequencing reveals the co-HGT of two Starships , Hephaestus and Pegasus . A) Read-mapping of Illumina sequencing reads derived from recipient strains to the Starships Hephaestus and Pegasus and flanking DNA in the donor genome (ie. P. variotii CBS 144490). Y axis indicates read coverage (from 0 to 4500 reads mapped per 1 kb window). Colour indicates the number of SNPs within each 1 kb window. Red horizontal lines indicate estimates of copy number from 1 to 3. B) Comparison between the A. fumigatus recipient #53 contig containing the integrated Hephaestus and the wild type A. fumigatus A1160 chromosome 4 (nucleotide position 1495672 to 3322498). C) Position of Hephaestus and Pegasus insertions within the recipient genomes. Grey rectangles represent sequencing contigs. For P. paravariotii FRR 5287 the largest 29 contigs representing 98.5% of the total assembly are shown. D) Sequence logo of target sites at which Hephaestus and Pegasus were found within the recipient strains. Starship Pegasus co-transfers with Hephaestus In interpreting the results of our HGT transfer experiments, we explicitly considered alternative explanations (beyond simple spontaneous resistance) for the emergence of apparent recipient phenotypes, i.e. strains that are hygromycin-resistant and able to grow without leucine. These alternative scenarios, including introgression, parasexual recombination, exogenous DNA uptake and hybridization, would result in additional DNA beyond the Starship being transferred ( Figure 2A , Figure S1 ). Thus, to rule out these alternative hypotheses we mapped the Illumina reads from the recipient strains back to the donor genome to demonstrate that they precisely contain Starship DNA embedded in their genome and no other donor DNA ( see supplementary discussion “extended arguments for why HGT is the most likely explanation” ). Outside of Hephaestus , a single additional region with signatures of HGT is observed in some recipient strains. However it does not correspond to random genomic sequence (as would be expected if transfer was achieved through the random uptake of exogenous DNA), but rather to a second Starship which we had previously identified within the P. variotii CBS 144490 genome and named Pegasus [ 21 ]. Neither P. paravariotii FRR 5287 nor A. fumigatus naturally contain Pegasus. The movement of Pegasus is remarkable given the lack of selection for its maintenance in recipient strains (unlike hygR-tagged Hephaestus ). These data support a prior hypothesis based on bioinformatic analyses that Hephaestus and Pegasus horizontally transfer together, given their apparent simultaneous appearance in the genomes of wild-type environmental strains from different species [ 21 ]. We note that both Hephaestus and Pegasus are the only two Starships found in the donor strain P. variotii CBS 144490. Pegasus is the largest of all Starships detected across the Paecilomyces genus, totalling 403.7 kb in length (see below). The transfer of Hephaestus does not appear to depend on the transfer of Pegasus. Of the 26 recipient strains that were sequenced with Illumina: 50% (4/8) derived from P. variotii CBS 144490 obtained 1 additional copy of Pegasus , and 100% (15/15) of recipient strains derived from P. paravariotii FRR 5287 obtained at least 1 copy of Pegasus with 26.7% (4/15) obtaining 2 copies ( Figure 2A , Figure S1 , Table S2 ). We did not observe the co-transfer of Pegasus into A. fumigatus , but fewer of these recipients were sequenced ( Figure 2A , Figure S1 , Table S2 ). As with Hephaestus , we determined integration sites in the recipient genomes by mapping reads to the edges of Pegasus . These target sites were consistent with the 10 bp conserved target sites observed for a mini- Pegasus Starship ( Figure 2D , Figure S4 , see supplemental results “characterisation of the Pegasus Starship” ). In some cases Hephaestus is found nested within Pegasus . It is impossible to know post hoc if this was a nested transfer (i.e. Hephaestus nested prior to transfer) or a sequential transfer with Hephaestus coincidentally finding a target site within Pegasus. Since Pegasus does not have a selectable marker, we do not know whether its transfer is dependent on Hephaestus . The finding that two Starships have horizontally transferred is intriguing given the known complex interactions between bacterial mobile elements that lead to both conflict and cooperation between different elements [ 36 ]. This includes the existence of “Hitcher Genetic Elements” which require the help of other elements to transfer [ 37 ]. Given our observation of consistent co-transfers, future studies may uncover similar dynamics between Starship elements as well as the specific mechanism of Starship movement between strains. Starship -mediated HGT is a prevalent natural phenomenon The prevalence and incidence of eukaryotic HGT is strongly debated [ 8 ]. To provide greater ecological and evolutionary context to the experimental demonstration of HGT under laboratory conditions, we estimated the extent of naturally-occurring Starship -mediated HGT across the Paecilomyces genus using comparative genomics. We conducted automated and manual annotations of Starships across Paecilomyces to find that this genus hosts a diverse repertoire of 33 distinct Starships , ranging from 16-403 kb in size (71.5 kb on average) and carrying between 1-123 protein-coding genes (18 genes on average; see supplemental results “Survey of Starships in Paecilomyces” ; Table S3; Figure S6 - S18 . We systematically searched for recently transferred copies of these elements across the Pezizomycotina , the largest subphylum of filamentous fungi predicted to be the primary hosts of Starships (Table S3.5) [ 35 ]. We found that upwards of 9/33 Starships (27.3%; ranging from 52.0 kb - 403 kb) have evidence of horizontal transfer either to or from various Paecillomyces species, with 6 (18.2%) having crossed genus-level boundaries ( Figure 3 ; Table S3.6). We consider some of the within genus transfers to only be likely cases of HGT, since it can be challenging to completely rule out alternative explanations such as introgression or incomplete lineage sorting among more closely related species. However, these alternative explanations lose power when evaluating other cases of within genus transfers, such as Pegasus , where the observed sequence similarity among transferred Starships vastly exceeds background levels across the entire genome. Among the 9 Starships with evidence of transfer, 4 were previously identified ( Hephaestus [ 25 ] ( Figure S7 ), Chrysaor [ 29 ] ( Figure S8 ), Prometheus [ 29 ] ( Figure S9 ), and Pegasus [ 21 ] ( Figure S10 )) and most encode conditionally beneficial cargo such as genes conferring heavy metal resistance and formaldehyde detoxification. The 5 additional Starships with evidence of horizontal transfer are described here for the first time, thereby roughly doubling previous assessments of horizontally-transferable Starships within the Paecilomyces genus: Demeter ( Figure S11 ), Hades ( Figure S12 ), Hera ( Figure S13 ), Hestia ( Figure S14 ) and Keraunos ( Figure S15 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3: Starships transfer across fungal species and genera. The maximum likelihood phylogeny (left) was generated using conserved BUSCO orthologs from genomes containing predicted Starships detected in the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) screen. All branches have 100% ultra-fast bootstrap and aLRT support. Estimated branching times in red are derived using TimeTree [ 40 ]. Each black dot in the plot to the immediate right of the phylogeny represents the presence of a Paecilomyces -derived Starship in at least one genome from the associated species in the phylogeny as detected using BLAST. Starships in the “Lab” columns summarize the findings of our experimental transfer data, while Starships in the “Natural populations” columns summarize the findings of our comparative genomic screen across the Pezizomycotina (n=10,010 genomes). * indicates newly described Starships. T he synteny alignments (right) summarize nucleotide identity among copies of the Keraunos Starship with evidence of horizontal transfer in species for which we were able to recover complete and unfragmented copies of this element. Predicted gene models are symbolized as gray arrows (no de novo gene predictions were performed for assemblies outside of Paecilomyces ). We note that our estimates of Starship diversity within Paecilomyces and thus our subsequent estimates of horizontal transfer rates are conservative, as the vast majority of Starships within a given species typically segregate at low frequencies [ 38 ]. Starships are furthermore more likely to be annotated if using a dataset containing multiple contiguous long-read assemblies from the same species [ 38 ]. We therefore do not expect to have recovered the complete set of Starships from Paecilomyces , since our dataset mostly consists of short-read assemblies with, in many cases, few sequenced strains per species. For example, we found that, on average, only 19% of all annotated captains in each genome were associated with a full-length Starship element ( Figure S18 ). Additionally, depending on the annotation method used (either BLAST-based searches of known elements or de novo starfish predictions), between 15-24 of the 33 Paecilomyces Starships are only ever found in a single strain, as are the vast majority of Starships with evidence of horizontal transfer in other Pezizomycotina species. We note this bias would not impact our main conclusions, other than potentially leading us to underestimate the prevalence of Starship horizontal transfer. Despite these biases, most of the transferred Starships are restricted to the Eurotiales (the taxonomic order containing our query genus), supporting previous findings that the frequency of Starship -mediated HGT likely decreases with increasing phylogenetic distance [ 39 ]. Yet even so, several transfers involving near identical elements have occurred between distantly related species, including between the orders Eurotiales and Onygenales . The long distance transfers suggest that Starships are able to mediate horizontal transfer across species separated by upwards of 180 million years of evolution ( Figure 3 ), roughly equivalent to a transfer event between monotremes and eutherian mammals [ 40 ]. Our estimate that between 18.2-27.3% of Paecilomyces Starships show evidence of recent HGT in natural fungal populations (including the HGT of relatively rare Starships in our dataset) suggests Starship -mediated HGT is a commonly occurring natural phenomenon, as opposed to either an experimentally-induced artifact or a rare event. These observations align with the fact that Starship -mediated HGT in the lab utilized near-natural conditions: strains were merely co-cultured on standard fungal growth media, as opposed to imposing highly artificial interventions such as harsh chemical treatment and/or the removal of the cell wall, as is typically done during conventional fungal transformations. Furthermore, in the case of Pegasus, the Starship transfer and subsequent maintenance occurred without directed selection for any particular cargo carried by this element, highlighting the fact that Starship transfer, like any other mutational event, occurs prior to selection. Although we focused on specific taxa, Starship -mediated horizontal transfer is not limited to the Eurotiales or Paecilomyces : indeed, reports of Starships with evidence of horizontal transfer appear in multiple species from taxonomic classes across the Pezizomycotina [ 26 , 27 , 41 ]. We thus conclude that Starships must now be included in the repertoire of naturally-occurring and experimentally demonstrated mechanisms of fungal gene exchange ( Figure 3B ). This places Starship transfer alongside processes such as sexual recombination first described in the 1820’s [ 42 , 43 ], parasex first shown experimentally in the 1950’s [ 44 ] ( see supplementary discussion “Horizontal Chromosome Transfer: a special case of parasex?” ), and natural transformation first shown experimentally in the 1970’s [ 45 ]. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4: Mechanisms of genetic exchange in fungi. Starship -mediated horizontal gene transfer (HGT) adds a new mechanism to the repertoire of established and naturally-occurring processes of genetic exchange in fungi. HCT = horizontal chromosome transfer. Conclusion We demonstrate that Starship giant transposable elements are a mechanism of horizontal transfer in eukaryotes. This provides an answer to what has been a decades-old mystery: how DNA is transferred between fungal species [ 46 ]. Giant transposable element-mediated HGT might be relevant to eukaryote evolution more broadly. Mavericks are giant virus-like transposons first discovered in the mid 2000’s within the genomes of a wide diversity of eukaryotes [ 47 , 48 ]. Recently, it has been shown that Maverick transposons have been horizontally transferred between nematode species and furthermore that Mavericks carry a putative cargo gene which is not required for mobility [ 20 ]. Future work may reveal that Mavericks or some other currently unknown transposons are analogs of Starships in animals and plants. The experiments presented here place the study of eukaryotic HGT at a ‘coming of age’ moment and prepare us to more adequately address fungal threats and opportunities head on with mechanistic knowledge of how the exchange of genetic information is achieved across species boundaries. Methods Fungal strains and media Paecilomyces variotii strains CBS 144490 ( Hephaestus+ , Pegasus +), Paecilomyces paravariotii strain FRR 5287 ( Hephaestus+ , Pegasus -) and Aspergillus fumigatus A1160 ( Hephaestus- , Pegasus -) [ 49 , 50 ] were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 380 mg/L leucine except for where selection against leucine auxotrophs was required in which case minimal medium was used [ 51 ] or where antibiotic selection was required in which case the medium was supplemented with either hygromycin (100 µg/ml for Paecilomyces and 250 µg/ml Aspergillus ) or G418 (200 µg/ml). For confirming hygromycin resistance and leucine auxotrophy phenotypes Paecilomyces was incubated for 5 days and Aspergillus for 3 days both at 30°C. DNA extraction DNA was extracted from lyophilized mycelium grown overnight at 30°C in PDA following a modified version of that followed by Pitken et al. [ 52 ]. Samples were homogenized by bead beating, suspended in 1 ml of CTAB buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.7 M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA pH 8, 1% CTAB, 1% β-mercaptoethanol) then incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes. 500 µl was then added to an equal volume of chloroform and centrifuged at maximum speed in a benchtop centrifuge for 10 min. The aqueous phase was mixed with an equal volume of isopropanol to precipitate the DNA which was subsequently pelleted, washed with 70% ethanol and air dried before being resuspended in H 2 O. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of P. variotii CBS 144490 In the previous P. variotii CBS 144490 genome assembly based on Illumina reads [ 34 ] the Pegasus Starship was highly fragmented [ 21 ]. Thus we resequenced this strain using Oxford Nanopore at the Central Analytical Research Facility at the Queensland University of Technology. DNA was extracted from two runs, one using unsheared DNA, the LSK110 ligation sequencing kit, and Minion flow cell chemistry R9.4.1. The second was conducted similarly but using DNA sheared to approximately 20 kb using a 26G needle. Assembly and polishing steps were conducted in Galaxy [ 53 ]. The reads were assembled using Flye (Galaxy version 2.9 [ 54 ]) with two polishing iterations and a minimum overlap of 7,044 bp between reads. Previously generated Illumina reads (SRA SRX4939669) were mapped to the genome using Bowtie 2 (Galaxy version 2.4.5 [ 55 ]) to correct errors associated with Nanopore sequencing [ 56 ] using Pilon [ 57 ]. Gene annotations were transferred from the JGI assembly using liftoff version v1.5.1 [ 58 ]. Cloning 1. Construction of mini- Pegasus A minimal version of Pegasus was constructed analogous to a minimal Hephaestus construct which we reported previously ( Figure S4 ) [ 21 ]. Minimal Pegasus consisted of 4,770 bp of 5’ terminal sequence including the captain sequence, the zrcA gene used as a selectable marker and 2060 bp of 3’ terminal sequence. The minimal Starship was nested inside the hygromycin selectable marker. To achieve this mini- Pegasus was cloned within an intron (the second intron of the gene model encoding protein JGI ID 278152 from CBS 144490 [ 34 ]) added to the HYG resistance cassette which naturally contains the Pegasus direct repeat sequence previously observed [ 21 ]. The first half of the hygromycin resistance cassette was amplified from plasmid PMAI6 [ 59 ] with primers AP244+AP584 (Primer sequences are given in Table S4 ). The 5’ of Pegasus was amplified in two halves with primer pairs AP595+AP593 (subsequently amplified with AP596+AP593) and AP586+AP592. The zrcA selectable marker that confers resistance to Zn 2+ ions was amplified with AP587+AP588, the 3’ of Pegasus was amplified with AP589+AP590 and the second half of the hygromycin resistance cassette was amplified with AP591+AP243. All fragments were cloned into the plasmid PLAUB36 [ 21 ] digested with EcoRI and HindIII, via homologous recombination in yeast. The required intron sequence was included within the primer sequences. The design of the construct was imperfect as it resulted in an inadvertent duplication of the 5’ direct repeat, and as a result leaves a copy of the direct repeat inside the intron following excision. However, this additional copy of the direct repeat did not impact the function of the intron (as demonstrated through hygromycin resistance) so redesigning the construct was unnecessary. 2. Construction of a leuA gene replacement (KO) strain A construct was made to delete the leuA homolog of Paecilomyces CBS 144490. Loss of this gene results in leucine auxotrophy in Paecilomyces variotii as in other fungi [ 34 ]. 1681 bp 5’ to the gene was amplified with primers ASW7+ASW8, the G418 resistance cassette of PMAI2 [ 59 ] was amplified with ASW9+ASW10 and 1655 bp 3’ to the gene was amplified with primers ASW11+ASW12. The fragments were combined into plasmid PLAUB36 [ 21 ] digested with EcoRI and HindIII via homologous recombination in yeast. 3. Construction of hhpJ KO In order to tag the Hephaestus Starship we targeted a hygromycin resistance cassette by homologous recombination into the hhpJ locus in Hephaestus . 2,307 bp of sequence 5’ to the gene were amplified with primers ASW1+ASW2, the HYGR resistance cassette of PMAI6 was amplified with ASW3+ASW4 and 2,233 bp 3’ to the gene were amplified with primers ASW5+ASW6. The fragments were combined into plasmid PLAUB36 [ 21 ] digested with EcoRI and HindIII via homologous recombination in yeast. Transformation of Paecilomyces variotii and screening for homologous integration Paecilomyces variotii was transformed using Agrobacterium strain EHA105 [ 34 ]. Integration in the leuA locus was screening for phenotypically via plating transformants on to media with and without leucine. Integration in the hhpJ locus within Hephaestus was assayed via PCR with primers pair ASW73+ASW74 which amplify a fragment internal to the hhpJ gene. The genotype of the donor strain was confirmed using Illumina sequencing and mapping the reads to the leuA and hhpJ regions using Bowtie 2 [ 55 ] to confirm their absence ( Figure S5 ). Transposition of Pegasus within genome Single germlings of the mini- Pegasus transformants were placed at the center of a 90 mm PDA plate and allowed to grow for two weeks at 30°C. At that time the spores were harvested from the plate in 5 ml of H 2 O and 1 ml aliquots of spore suspension were replated onto PDA plates containing hygromycin. Emergent hygromycin resistant colonies were picked and then Illumina sequenced as a pool. Coculture of donor and acceptor strains to produce recipient strains To demonstrate the horizontal movement of Starships between strains we first generated a “Donor strain”. This strain was transformed with the hhpJ (hygromycin selection) and leuA (G418 selection) knockout constructs. This strain is unable to grow in the absence of leucine. We then paired this strain with various wild-type acceptor strains including the isogenic wild type, P. paravariotii, and Aspergillus fumigatus A1160. Pairings were made by streaking both strains on top of each other in a straight line down the center of a 90 mm PDA petri dish then leaving the strains to grow together at 20°C for four weeks. After which time 1/5th of the spores from the plate were transferred onto media lacking leucine with hygromycin and incubated until recipients emerged. Plates were scored in a binary manner as either having or not having recipient growth. For each plate a representative transformant was selected and purified by streaking spores onto a petri dish and excising a single germling after overnight incubation. The genotype of the recipients was validated either by Illumina genome sequencing or for some cases involving FRR 5287 by PCR. For PCR a region 801 bp upstream of the 5’ TTAC direct repeat flanking Hephaestus in P. variotii CBS 144490 was amplified with primer pair ASW269+ASW270. The amplified region was polymorphic between FRR 5287 with an EcoRI site unique to P. variotii CBS 144490. As such PCRs could be digested with EcoRI to determine the background genotype of the recipient. The presence of the hygromycin and leuA alleles were confirmed using a multiplex PCR with primers ASW160+ASW161 amplifying a fragment of the hygromycin resistance marker and ASW66+ASW67 amplifying a fragment of the leuA gene. Illumina sequencing analysis DNA was sequenced via 150 bp paired-end libraries prepared using either an Illumina DNA prep (M) kit at the Australian Genome Research Facility (for mini- Pegasus ), a Watchmaker PCR-free kit at Macrogen (most recipient strains) or at Novogene (the donor strain and recipient strains 1, 2, 7 and 8). Reads of each recipient strain were mapped to the genome of both CBS 144490 (from which the donor was derived) and for cross-species transfers the corresponding recipient P. paravariotii FRR 5287 [ 32 ] or A. fumigatus A1160 [ 60 ] using Bowtie 2 [ 55 ]. Coverage over 1 kb non-overlapping windows across the genome was determined using bamCoverage [ 61 ]. SNPs were called using FreeBayes [ 62 ]. The number of SNPs in each 1 kb window was determined using bedtools intersect [ 63 ]. These steps were implemented using a workflow developed on the Australian Galaxy server [ 53 ]. The repetitive nature of Pegasus and multiple copies of Hephaestus limited the use of assembly-based approaches in analyzing the recipient strains. However, the exceptions were the A. fumigatus recipient strains #53 and #58 which contained a single copy of Hephaestus and no Pegasus . The genomes were assembled using Velvet version 1.2.10 [ 64 ]. A dot plot to compare the assembly contigs containing Hephaestus with the wild type chromosome was generated using D-GENIES [ 65 ]. Phenotyping of metal ion resistances Resistances to four of the metal ion resistances conferred by Hephaestus were assessed on PDA supplemented with CuSO 4 , CdSO 4 or ZnSO 4 . Aspergillus or Paecilomyces conidia were suspended in water (10 6 spores per ml) and 2 μl of this spore suspension was pipetted onto the center of a PDA petri dish (with or without metals added). Strains were incubated for three days (or four days for the plates containing copper sulfate) at 30°C. Survey of Paecilomyces Starships We downloaded 78 publicly available genomes from the Paecilomyces genus and combined them with a resequenced long-read assembly of CBS144490 (Table S3.1). Genomes were filtered for contigs smaller than 1kb, soft-masked using Earl Grey ([ 66 ]) then annotated using Braker3 ([ 67 ]) (--fungus --gff3) using compleasm (--busco_lineage=eurotiales_odb10) and the OrthoDB-11 fungal protein database (--prot_seq). Functional annotation was added using iprscan ([ 68 ]), emapper ([ 69 ]) and funannotate using the ‘ascomycota’ busco database. All genomes and their resulting proteomes were analysed with BUSCO (eurotiales_odb10). Orthofinder was run on the combined resulting proteomes. For the Paecilomyces genus tree, we used BUSCO (-l eurotiales) [ 70 ] was run on all genomes, BUSCOs conserved across all genomes were extracted, aligned using mafft (--auto) [ 71 ] and trimmed (-automated1). A species tree was built using iqtree (--alrt 1000 --ufboot 1000 -T AUTO --seed 111111) [ 72 ] and the resulting tree was rooted at the midpoint ( Figure S6 ). We systematically annotated Starships in the 79 Paecilomyces genomes using starfish v1.1 [ 35 ]. First starfish annotate was run (-p ∼/starfish/db/YRsuperfams.p1-512.hmm -P ∼/starfish/db/YRsuperfamRefs.faa) to de-novo annotate tyrosine recombinases (tyrR). We combined this annotation with the complete proteome using starfish consolidate and then tyrRs were clustered using starfish sketch . Starship elements were detected using a starfish insert sequentially two times, the second time we reduced the conservative default flanking parameters (--pid 80 --hsp 750) to help detection in genomes with larger distances to others. Information on the predicted elements and their associated Captains was summarised using starfish summarize . Captains were assigned to families using hmmsearch and to different homologous gene groups based on their amino acid sequences using mmseqs easy-cluster . Starships were then assigned to haplotypes using starfish sim and group . Each candidate Starship was visualised using both starfish pair-viz and element-viz , then manually inspected. 60/75 candidates with good indicators (large flanking regions for the inserted sequence, haplotype found in multiple unique locations) were kept ( Figure S6 ; Table S3.3). Reference Starships of each homologous captain group (navis) and haplotype were designated and manual curation of flanking sequence and insertion sites was conducted to refine the boundaries of each element. To evaluate the distribution of these Starships outside of the Paecilomyces genus, the reference sequence for each Starship haplotype was BLAST searched against all publicly available NCBI genomes in the Pezizomycotina (10,010 complete genome assemblies downloaded on December 20, 2024). After initially filtering out alignments less than 10 kb and 80% identity, alignments were removed if the total length of the alignment per haplotype was less than 50 kb or covered <50% of the total length of the Starship haplotype query. Each alignment was then realigned, with an additional 50 kb added to the distal edges of the most upstream and downstream BLAST alignments, with nucmer [ 73 ], the delta file was converted to paf format using paftools delta2paf [ 74 ] and visualised using gggenomes [ 75 ]. BUSCO phylogeny We used BUSCO (-l eurotiales) to annotate conserved orthologs in all genomes identified as containing a horizontally transferred Starship , plus two additional genomes from the Onygenales ( Blastomyces silverae (GCA_001014755.1) and Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (GCA_000150735.2)) [ 70 ]. BUSCOs present in all genomes were extracted, aligned using mafft (--auto) [ 71 ] and trimmed (-automated1). A species tree was built using iqtree (--alrt 1000 --ufboot 1000 -T AUTO --seed 111111) using the BUSCO protein sequence alignment [ 72 ] and rooted using the two additional Onygenales genomes. We used TimeTree [ 40 ] to estimate the timing separation between the Onygenales / Eurotiales and Aspergillaceae / Thermoascaceae . Data availability Sequencing data for P. variotii CBS 144490 including raw reads and an assembly have been deposited under NCBI BioProject PRJNA1211195. A genome annotation file for CBS 144490 is available on the Melbourne Figshare repository (doi 10.26188/28502201) Funding A.S.U. was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research Award (DE250100255), a Wenner-Gren Foundation postdoctoral scholarship, and funding from The Royal Physiographic Society of Lund and the Lars Hiertas Minne Foundation. E.G.-T and S.O. are supported by the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and the Department of Plant Pathology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A.A.V. was provided with support by funding from the Swedish Research Council VR (grant number 2021-04290), and ERC-2023-COG (Starship, 101126121) to A.A.V. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. Supplementary results Hephaestus is integrated into the genome during co-culture via HGT We assessed the position of Hephaestus in each recipient by looking for reads mapping to the flanks of Hephaestus and mapping the overhanging portions of these reads back to the acceptor genome ( Figure 2C ). The obtained sites showed the expected TTAC(N7)A target site previously determined for Hephaestus ( Figure 2D , Figure S3 ) [ 21 ]. The native copy of Hephaestus , if present, was maintained at the expected locus whereas the received copy was integrated elsewhere for the vast majority of pairings. The one exception was P. paravariotii FRR 5287 recipient #43 in which the native Hephaestus has transposed to a new genomic position. In some cases more integration sites were observed than expected indicating a mixed culture of two recipient strains each containing one new copy obtained during the transfer experiment. For example, in recipient #9 read depth indicated a single additional copy of Hephaestus ( Figure S1 ), yet two additional integration sites were observed ( Figure S3 ). Characterisation of the Pegasus Starship Given that Pegasus had transferred in our experiment we further investigated the biological features of this transposon. In the previously available assembly of P. variotii CBS 144490, Pegasus was fragmented across multiple assembly contigs, likely due to internal duplications [ 21 ]. In the only other genome known to contain Pegasus , that of Paecilomyces lecythidis strain MCCF 102, Pegasus is highly fragmented and has been inactivated through mutation [ 21 ]. Thus the full sequence of Pegasus was unknown and it was not known if the CBS 144490 copy of Pegasus was an active Starship . To determine the complete sequence of Pegasus we resequenced the CBS 144490 genome with Oxford Nanopore technology and used these long-reads to assemble the genome into ten nuclear contigs and one mitochondrial contig. Within this assembly Pegasus was completely assembled on contig 2. Pegasus is 403.6 kb and it contains 123 predicted genes (lifted over from our previous annotated assembly [ 34 ]) including characteristic Starship genes, namely a captain recombinase, and two DUF3723 domain proteins. The function of DUF3723 domain proteins is not known but they are commonly found in Starships [ 22 ]. In addition it contains a further captain recombinase and DUF3723 belonging to a potentially nested Starship ( Figure S4A ). Similar to previous work on Hephaestus we generated a mini-element including the terminal sequences, the captain and a selectable marker, and embedded this mini-element within a hygromycin-resistance cassette ( Figure S4B ). This allowed for us to screen for transposition of the mini-element. By sequencing a pool of strains in which Pegasus had transposed we were able to identify 47 insertion sites of mini- Pegasus which were broadly distributed across the genome ( Figure S4C ). These insertion sites revealed a 10 bp palindromic target site TACCTAGGTA ( Figure S4D ). Survey of Starships in Paecilomyces We combined both automated and manual annotations of Starships across the Paecilomyces genus using a set of 79 genomes, spanning 10 phylogenetically validated species ( Figure S6 ; Table S3.1; Table S3.2). We detected 33 distinct Starship haplotypes from 6 Captain tyrR families ( Enterprise, Galactica, Hephaestus, Phoenix, Prometheus and Tardis ) ranging from 16-403 kb in size ( Figure S6 ; Table S3.3). We then systematically searched for recently transferred copies of these elements using publicly available NCBI genome assemblies for the Pezizomycotina (n=10,010), the largest subphylum of filamentous fungi predicted to be the primary carriers of Starships (Table S3.1) [ 35 ]. Initially, to support the assertion that highly similar regions observed among different species are likely a result of HGT, we show that the ability to align genomic sequences is rapidly lost within the Paecilomyces genus when comparing increasingly more distantly related species, using the long-read assembly of P. formosus as a reference ( Figure S16 ). Pairwise whole-genome alignments to the long-read P. formosus assembly covered 12-96% of the genome with average alignment lengths of 1-30 kb across all genome-genome comparisons within Paecilomyces . This reduced further to <1% coverage and <1 kb alignments on average when aligning genomes from other genera to the P. formosus assembly, emphasizing a drastic decrease in the recovery of highly similar and large sequences by chance ( Figure S16 ). The species IDs of all putative donors and recipients were also confirmed by building a BUSCO-based maximum likelihood phylogeny ( Figure 3 ; Table S3.2). Pairwise alignments between each Starship copy and the genomes in which they were identified revealed an average identity of 88-99% and an average total alignment length of 52-286 kb ( Figure S16 ). Notably, the average pairwise nucleotide similarity of all Starships/ genomic regions identified as originating from Keraunos was 93% across 13 species spanning four genera and two taxonomic orders, the Eurotiales and Onygenales . Additionally, we now have evidence that two different Starships have been transferred between different strains of Paecilomyces variotii and Spiromastigoides sp. These two Starships contain captains from different families and do not align to one another. This indicates that the movement of Starships over such long distances is not restricted to particular Captain tyrR families and is a more general feature of Starship elements. The alignment of Keraunos elements from different species further indicated that a tandem insertion of a different Starship at the 5’ end of a subset of Keraunos elements has created a hybrid Starship that appears to horizontally transfer as a single contiguous element. The captain of this additional Starship is closely related to captain tyrRs from the previously described Mithridate Starship (Supp figure of captain tree?) [ 29 ]. The transfer of Hera appears to be a potential case of cargo-swapping, as alignment to the captain tyrR in the reference element was missing in all cases of identified similarity with other genomes ( Figure S13 ). 2 out of the 9 ships with evidence of HGT contain a MYB/SANT-like transcription factor at the edge of the element opposite the captain ( Figure S11 ; Figure S12 ) providing more evidence for the conserved structural position of this gene family in particular clades of Starship elements [ 28 ]. Supplementary discussion Why HGT is the most likely explanation to explain the outcomes of the experiments One alternative to HGT is parasexual recombination. While not specifically reported in Paecilomyces, parasex has been long known in a number of better-studied Eurotiales species and it is very possible that Paecilomyces may undergo this process [ 76 , 77 ]. This may be a particularly compelling explanation for the Starship transfer to an isogenic P. variotii acceptor. However, the expected result of parasex would be the introduction of Hephaestus carrying hygromycin resistance at the parent locus, ie, replacing the wild type Hephaestus copy of the acceptor strain through recombination. But what we observed in the Illumina sequencing was an increase in sequencing coverage over Hephaestus and the clean integration of one or more Hephaesti at new TTACN 7 A target sites within the genome. A related explanation for the observed Starship transfer in the isogenic pairing would be the transposition of Hephaestus (and additionally where relevant, Pegasus ) within the donor genome followed by parasexual recombination to result in strains having two copies. While theoretically possible, such an explanation would beg the question as to why we did not observe the other expected outcomes of this parasexual event, for example donor isolates that have inherited the leuA gene of the acceptor (which would complement the donor’s leucine-deficient phenotype). Furthermore, parasexual recombination is usually limited to within species and there is no precedent to our knowledge of parasex between genera, which would be required to explain the transfer into Aspergillus . Moreover, in the observed interspecies transfers, the genetic divergence between the donor and acceptor genomes allows us to determine that the only donor-derived DNA in the recipient strains is the Starship DNA. This would be a highly unlikely outcome from parasex alone. Another alternative explanation might be that the apparent recipient strains were in fact a heterokaryon or diploid between the donor and the recipient strain. While interspecies, and even intergenus heterokaryons have been reported, these are typically created under highly artificial conditions such as protoplast fusion and not through simple co-culture where vegetative incompatibility is expected to block fusion [ 78 ]. Additionally, in a heterokaryon we would expect to see additional DNA other than the Starship derived from the donor present in the recipient and would expect the apparent copy number of the transferred Starship to be less than one because not all nuclei in the heterokaryon would contain a copy of the Starship . Horizontal Chromosome Transfer: a special case of parasex? Previous work has observed the horizontal transfer of entire chromosomes in fungal co-cultures. However, these experimental studies are limited to transfers between closely related strains within a species or species complex [ 79 – 84 ]. It has been suggested that such transfers might be the result of parasex followed by selective chromosome inheritance [ 84 ]. However, intriguing alternative hypotheses independent of karyogamy have been proposed such as preferential transfer between nuclei [ 85 ]. A reliance on parasex would explain why such transfers appear to be restricted to short phylogenetic distances, typically within a single species. The only interspecific HCT to be discovered, between Metarhizium guizhouense and Metarhizium robertsii, involves two species separated by only 2.3 MY - 15.1 MY, far less than found here for Starships [ 86 ][ 83 ]. However, in other genera such as Cryptococcus, hybridisation remains possible across divergence times as large as what we observed [ 87 ]. We believe that further work is needed to establish HCT as a means of genetic exchange in fungi separate to parasex. Supplemental Tables and Figures View this table: View inline View popup Table S1: Outcomes of co-culture experiments between the P. variotii donor and 3 acceptor strains View this table: View inline View popup Table S2: Genotypes of strains sequenced with Illumina View this table: View inline View popup Table S4: Primers used in this study Download figure Open in new tab Figure S1: Illumina reads from recipient and wild type strains mapped to donor and acceptor genomes. Assembly contigs were concatenated prior to read mapping. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S2: Dot plot comparison between the assembly contig of recipient #58 which contains Hephaestus and the corresponding wild type A. fumigatus A1160 chromosome. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S3: Integration sites of Hephaestus and Pegasus within recipient genomes. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S4: Pegasus is an active Starship within the Paecilomyces variotii genome. A) gene map of the completely assembled Pegasus Starship showing captain and DUF3723 domain genes. B) The approach used to demonstrate the transposition of a minimal version of Pegasus embedded within a marker for hygromycin resistance. C) Insertion sites of minimal Pegasus across the genome. Shown are the largest 21 contigs which represent 94% of the complete assembly. D) Sequence alignment of mini- Pegasus insertion sites with sequence logo. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S5: Mapping density of Illumina reads derived from the donor strain to the wild type leuA and hhpJ gene regions. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S6: Distribution of 33 high-quality Starships annotated with starfish v.1.1 within 79 isolates across the Paecilomyces genus. Presence (red) and absence (gray/white) shown in heatmap to the right. The maximum likelihood phylogeny (left) was generated using conserved BUSCO orthologs from the 79 Paecilomyces genomes and is midpoint rooted. Ultra-fast bootstrap and aLRT support percentages (out of 1000) are shown below each branch. Tips are labeled by accession. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S7: Synteny alignments (left) for the Hephaestus Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using all P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequences from the other named isolates as targets. Predicted genes from Hephaestus are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S8: Synteny alignments (left) for the Chrysaor Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using all P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequences from the other named isolates as targets. Predicted genes from Chrysaor are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S9: Synteny alignments (left) for the Prometheus Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequence from Spiromastix as a target. Predicted genes from Prometheus are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S10: Synteny alignments (left) for the Pegasus Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequence from P. lecythidis as a target. Predicted genes from Pegasus are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S11: Synteny alignments (left) for the Demeter Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequence from P. roquefortii as a target. Predicted genes from Demeter are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S12: Synteny alignments (left) for the Hades Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. lecythidis protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequence from P. maximus as a target. Predicted genes from Hades are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S13: Synteny alignments (left) for the Hera Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequence from P. chrysogenum as a target. Predicted genes from Hera are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S14: Synteny alignments (left) for the Hestia Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequences from P. lecythidis as targets. Predicted genes from Hestia are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S15: Synteny alignments (left) for the Keraunos Starship shown for species with evidence of its horizontal transfer. Predicted genes are depicted as arrows. De novo gene prediction was performed only for Paecilomyces isolates. BLASTall plots (right) showing nucleotide BLAST alignment length and identity using P. variotii protein-coding gene sequences as queries and whole genome sequences from the other named isolates as targets. Predicted genes from Keraunos are shown in red. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S16: Summary statistics from alignments between whole genomes and Starship Haplotypes. A) Pairwise whole-genome alignments of a single focal P. formosus genome against all genomes within the Paecilomyces phylogeny showing how alignment coverage across the genome and average alignment length decreases with increasing phylogenetic distance. Red vertical line indicates a 10kb threshold that was used to filter out alignments in the HGT screen. B) Average identity and total length of alignments between Starship copies found across the different genomes predicted to have exchanged these 9 different Starships through HGT. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S17: Length of 33 high-quality Starships identified by Starfish in the Paecilomyces. Both elements observed to have transferred experimentally are highlighted in red. All other Starships with evidence of HGT are highlighted in blue. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S18: The total number of annotated captain tyrosine recombinases and the total number of full-length high-quality Starships per Paecilomyces genome, as predicted by starfish v1.1. The maximum likelihood phylogeny (left) was generated using conserved BUSCO orthologs from the 79 Paecilomyces genomes and midpoint rooted. Ultra-fast bootstrap and aLRT support percentages (out of 1000) are shown below each branch. The bar chart shows the total number of annotated captains (grey) and Starships (red) per genome. Acknowledgements We thank Alexander Idnurm for critical review of the manuscript. We thank Ben Auxier for the insightful discussions. Figure 1A was created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/b64u749 . References 1. ↵ Van Etten J , Bhattacharya D . Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes: Not if, but how much? Trends Genet . 2020 ; 36 : 915 – 925 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. Crisp A , Boschetti C , Perry M , Tunnacliffe A , Micklem G . Expression of multiple horizontally acquired genes is a hallmark of both vertebrate and invertebrate genomes . Genome Biol . 2015 ; 16 : 50 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Alexander WG , Wisecaver JH , Rokas A , Hittinger CT . Horizontally acquired genes in early-diverging pathogenic fungi enable the use of host nucleosides and nucleotides . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2016 ; 113 : 4116 – 4121 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 4. ↵ Xia J , Guo Z , Yang Z , Han H , Wang S , Xu H , et al. Whitefly hijacks a plant detoxification gene that neutralizes plant toxins . Cell . 2021 ; 184 : 1693 – 1705 .e17. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Graham LA , Li J , Davidson WS , Davies PL . Smelt was the likely beneficiary of an antifreeze gene laterally transferred between fishes . BMC Evol Biol . 2012 ; 12 : 190 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. Graham LA , Davies PL . Horizontal gene transfer in vertebrates: A fishy tale . Trends Genet . 2021 ; 37 : 501 – 503 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Larsson DGJ , Flach C-F . Antibiotic resistance in the environment . Nat Rev Microbiol . 2022 ; 20 : 257 – 269 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Keeling PJ . Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes: aligning theory with data . Nat Rev Genet . 2024 ; 25 : 416 – 430 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Case NT , Gurr SJ , Fisher MC , Blehert DS , Boone C , Casadevall A , et al. Fungal impacts on Earth’s ecosystems . Nature . 2025 ; 638 : 49 – 57 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Gonçalves C , Hittinger CT , Rokas A. Horizontal gene transfer in fungi and its ecological importance. Fungal Associations . Cham : Springer ; 2024 . pp. 59 – 81 . 11. ↵ Zhang Q , Chen X , Xu C , Zhao H , Zhang X , Zeng G , et al. Horizontal gene transfer allowed the emergence of broad host range entomopathogens . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2019 ; 116 : 7982 – 7989 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. ↵ Weigel BJ , Burgett SG , Chen VJ , Skatrud PL , Frolik CA , Queener SW , et al. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of isopenicillin N synthetase genes from Streptomyces lipmanii and Aspergillus nidulans . J Bacteriol . 1988 ; 170 : 3817 – 3826 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 13. ↵ Szöllősi GJ , Davín AA , Daubin TE , V , Boussau , B . Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis finds extensive gene transfer among fungi . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci . 2015 ; 370 : 20140335 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Wisecaver JH , Slot JC , Rokas A . The evolution of fungal metabolic pathways . PLoS Genet . 2014 ; 10 : e1004816 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Friesen TL , Stukenbrock EH , Liu Z , Meinhardt S , Ling H , Faris JD , et al. Emergence of a new disease as a result of interspecific virulence gene transfer . Nat Genet . 2006 ; 38 : 953 – 956 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 16. ↵ Gardiner DM , McDonald MC , Covarelli L , Solomon PS , Rusu AG , Marshall M , et al. Comparative pathogenomics reveals horizontally acquired novel virulence genes in fungi infecting cereal hosts . PLoS Pathog . 2012 ; 8 : e1002952 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Slot JC , Rokas A . Horizontal transfer of a large and highly toxic secondary metabolic gene cluster between fungi . Curr Biol . 2011 ; 21 : 134 – 139 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Wisecaver JH , Rokas A . Fungal metabolic gene clusters-caravans traveling across genomes and environments . Front Microbiol . 2015 ; 6 : 161 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. ↵ Arkhipova IR , Yushenova IA . Giant transposons in eukaryotes: Is bigger better? Genome Biol Evol . 2019 ; 11 : 906 – 918 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Widen SA , Bes IC , Koreshova A , Pliota P , Krogull D , Burga A . Virus-like transposons cross the species barrier and drive the evolution of genetic incompatibilities . Science . 2023 ; 380 : eade0705 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Urquhart AS , Vogan AA , Gardiner DM , Idnurm A . Starships are active eukaryotic transposable elements mobilized by a new family of tyrosine recombinases . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2023 ; 120 : e2214521120 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Gluck-Thaler E , Ralston T , Konkel Z , Ocampos CG , Ganeshan VD , Dorrance AE , et al. Giant Starship elements mobilize accessory genes in fungal genomes . Mol Biol Evol . 2022 ; 39 : msac109 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Shen X-X , Steenwyk JL , LaBella AL , Opulente DA , Zhou X , Kominek J , et al. Genome-scale phylogeny and contrasting modes of genome evolution in the fungal phylum Ascomycota . Sci Adv . 2020 ; 6 : eabd0079 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 24. ↵ Urquhart A , Vogan AA , Gluck-Thaler E . Starships : a new frontier for fungal biology . Trends Genet . 2024 ; 1060 – 1073 . 25. ↵ Urquhart AS , Chong NF , Yang Y , Idnurm A . A large transposable element mediates metal resistance in the fungus Paecilomyces variotii . Curr Biol . 2022 ; 32 : 937 – 950 .e5. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Sato Y , Bex R , van den Berg GCM , Höfte M , Seidl MF , Thomma BPHJ . Starship giant transposons dominate plastic genomic regions in a fungal plant pathogen and drive virulence evolution . bioRxiv ; 2025 . 27. ↵ Peck LD , Llewellyn T , Bennetot B , O’Donnell S , Nowell RW , Ryan MJ , et al. Horizontal transfers between fungal Fusarium species contributed to successive outbreaks of coffee wilt disease . PLoS Biol . 2023 ; 22 : e3002480 . OpenUrl 28. ↵ O’Donnell S , Rezende G , Vernadet J-P , Snirc A , Ropars J. Harbouring Starships: the accumulation of large horizontal gene transfers in domesticated and pathogenic fungi . bioRxiv . 2024 . doi: 10.1101/2024.07.03.601904 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Urquhart AS , Gluck-Thaler E , Vogan AA . Gene acquisition by giant transposons primes eukaryotes for rapid evolution via horizontal gene transfer . Sci Adv . 2024 ; 10 : eadp8738 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Bucknell AH , McDonald MC . That’s no moon, it’s a Starship : Giant transposons driving fungal horizontal gene transfer . Mol Microbiol . 2023 ; 120 : 555 – 563 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Sibbald SJ , Eme L , Archibald JM , Roger AJ . Lateral gene transfer mechanisms and pan-genomes in eukaryotes . Trends Parasitol . 2020 ; 36 : 927 – 941 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Urquhart AS , Idnurm A . A polyphasic approach including whole genome sequencing reveals Paecilomyces paravariotii sp. nov. as a cryptic sister species to P. variotii . J Fungi . 2023 ; 9 : 285 . OpenUrl CrossRef 33. ↵ Wingfield BD , Wingfield MJ . Gene transfer between fungal species triggers repeated coffee wilt disease outbreaks . PLoS Biol . 2024 ; 22 : e3002901 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Urquhart AS , Mondo SJ , Mäkelä MR , Hane JK , Wiebenga A , He G , et al. Genomic and genetic insights into a cosmopolitan fungus, Paecilomyces variotii (Eurotiales) . Front Microbiol . 2018 ; 9 : 3058 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Gluck-Thaler E , Vogan AA . Systematic identification of cargo-mobilizing genetic elements reveals new dimensions of eukaryotic diversity . Nucleic Acids Res . 2024 ; 52 : 5496 – 5513 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Horne T , Orr VT , Hall JP . How do interactions between mobile genetic elements affect horizontal gene transfer? Curr Opin Microbiol . 2023 ; 73 : 102282 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Ares-Arroyo M , Coluzzi C , Moura de Sousa JA , Rocha EPC . Hijackers, hitchhikers, or co-drivers? The mysteries of mobilizable genetic elements . PLoS Biol . 2024 ; 22 : e3002796 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Gluck-Thaler E , Forsythe A , Puerner C , Stajich JE , Croll D , Cramer RA , et al. Giant transposons promote strain heterogeneity in a major fungal pathogen . bioRxiv . 2024 . doi: 10.1101/2024.06.28.601215 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 39. ↵ Hill R , Smith D , Canning G , Grey M , Hammond-Kosack KE , McMullan M . Starship giant transposable elements cluster by host taxonomy using kmer-based phylogenetics . bioRxiv ; 2024 . Available: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.30.610507v1 40. ↵ Kumar S , Stecher G , Suleski M , Hedges SB . TimeTree: A resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times . Mol Biol Evol . 2017 ; 34 : 1812 – 1819 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. ↵ Bucknell A , Wilson HM , do Santos KCG , Simpfendorfer S , Milgate A , Germain H , et al. Sanctuary: A Starship transposon facilitating the movement of the virulence factor ToxA in fungal wheat pathogens . bioRxiv . 2024 . p. 2024.03.04.583430 . doi: 10.1101/2024.03.04.583430 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 42. ↵ Ehrenberg CF. Syzygites, eine neue Schimmelgattung, nebst Beobachtungen über sichtbare Bewegung in Schimmeln . Verhandl Ges Naturf Freunde Berl. 1820 ; I : 98 – 109 . OpenUrl 43. ↵ Ainsworth GC . Introduction to the history of mycology . Cambridge University Press ; 1976 . 44. ↵ Pontecorvo G , Roper JA , Hemmons LM , Macdonald KD , Bufton AWJ . The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans . Adv Genet . 1953 ; 5 : 141 – 238 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 45. ↵ Mishra NC . DNA-mediated genetic changes in Neurospora crassa . J Gen Microbiol . 1979 ; 113 : 255 – 259 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 46. ↵ Walton JD . Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of secondary metabolite gene clusters in fungi: an hypothesis . Fungal Genet Biol . 2000 ; 30 : 167 – 171 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 47. ↵ Pritham EJ , Putliwala T , Feschotte C . Mavericks , a novel class of giant transposable elements widespread in eukaryotes and related to DNA viruses . Gene . 2007 ; 390 : 3 – 17 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Kapitonov VV , Jurka J . Self-synthesizing DNA transposons in eukaryotes . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2006 ; 103 : 4540 – 4545 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 49. ↵ Fraczek MG , Bromley M , Buied A , Moore CB , Rajendran R , Rautemaa R , et al. The cdr1B efflux transporter is associated with non- cyp51a -mediated itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus . J Antimicrob Chemother . 2013 ; 68 : 1486 – 1496 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 50. ↵ Bertuzzi M , van Rhijn N , Krappmann S , Bowyer P , Bromley MJ , Bignell EM . On the lineage of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in common laboratory use . Med Mycol . 2021 ; 59 : 7 – 13 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Barratt RW , Johnson GB , Ogata WN . Wild-type and mutant stocks of Aspergillus nidulans . Genetics . 1965 ; 52 : 233 – 246 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 52. ↵ Pitkin JW , Panaccione DG , Walton JD . A putative cyclic peptide efflux pump encoded by the TOXA gene of the plant-pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus carbonum . Microbiology . 1996 ; 142 : 1557 – 1565 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 53. ↵ Galaxy Community . The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update . Nucleic Acids Res . 2024 ; 52 : W83 – W94 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ Kolmogorov M , Yuan J , Lin Y , Pevzner PA . Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs . Nat Biotechnol . 2019 ; 37 : 540 – 546 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Langmead B , Salzberg SL . Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 . Nat Methods . 2012 ; 9 : 357 – 359 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 56. ↵ Delahaye C , Nicolas J . Sequencing DNA with nanopores: Troubles and biases . PLoS One . 2021 ; 16 : e0257521 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Walker BJ , Abeel T , Shea T , Priest M , Abouelliel A , Sakthikumar S , et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement . PLoS One . 2014 ; 9 : e112963 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Shumate A , Salzberg SL . Liftoff: accurate mapping of gene annotations . Bioinformatics . 2021 ; 37 : 1639 – 1643 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ Idnurm A , Urquhart AS , Vummadi DR , Chang S , Van de Wouw AP , López-Ruiz FJ . Spontaneous and CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutation of the osmosensor histidine kinase of the canola pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans . Fungal Biol Biotechnol . 2017 ; 4 : 12 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. ↵ Bowyer P , Currin A , Delneri D , Fraczek MG . Telomere-to-telomere genome sequence of the model mould pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus . Nat Commun . 2022 ; 13 : 5394 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Ramírez F , Ryan DP , Grüning B , Bhardwaj V , Kilpert F , Richter AS , et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis . Nucleic Acids Res . 2016 ; 44 : W160 – 5 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Garrison E , Marth G . Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing . arXiv [q-bio.GN] . 2012 . Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907 63. ↵ Quinlan AR , Hall IM . BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features . Bioinformatics . 2010 ; 26 : 841 – 842 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 64. ↵ Zerbino DR , Birney E . Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs . Genome Res . 2008 ; 18 : 821 – 829 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 65. ↵ Cabanettes F , Klopp C . D-GENIES: dot plot large genomes in an interactive, efficient and simple way . PeerJ . 2018 ; 6 : e4958 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ Baril T , Galbraith J , Hayward A . Earl Grey: a fully automated user-friendly transposable element annotation and analysis pipeline . Mol Biol Evol . 2024 ; 41 : msae068 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 67. ↵ Gabriel L , Brůna T , Hoff KJ , Ebel M , Lomsadze A , Borodovsky M , et al. BRAKER3: Fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS and TSEBRA . Genome Res . 2023 ; 34 : 769 – 777 . OpenUrl 68. ↵ Quevillon E , Silventoinen V , Pillai S , Harte N , Mulder N , Apweiler R , et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier . Nucleic Acids Res . 2005 ; 33 : W116 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 69. ↵ Cantalapiedra CP , Hernández-Plaza A , Letunic I , Bork P , Huerta-Cepas J. EggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale . Mol Biol Evol. 2021 ; 38 : 5825 – 5829 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 70. ↵ Simão FA , Waterhouse RM , Ioannidis P , Kriventseva EV , Zdobnov EM . BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs . Bioinformatics . 2015 ; 31 : 3210 – 3212 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 71. ↵ Katoh K , Misawa K , Kuma K-I , Miyata T . MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform . Nucleic Acids Res . 2002 ; 30 : 3059 – 3066 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 72. ↵ Nguyen L-T , Schmidt HA , von Haeseler A , Minh BQ . IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies . Mol Biol Evol . 2015 ; 32 : 268 – 274 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ Marçais G , Delcher AL , Phillippy AM , Coston R , Salzberg SL , Zimin A . MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system . PLoS Comput Biol . 2018 ; 14 : e1005944 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 74. ↵ Li H . Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences . Bioinformatics . 2018 ; 34 : 3094 – 3100 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 75. ↵ Hackl T , Ankenbrand M , van Adrichem B , Wilkins D , Haslinger K . gggenomes: effective and versatile visualizations for comparative genomics . arXiv [q-bio.GN] . 2024 . Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13556 76. ↵ Pontecorvo G , Sermonti G . Para-sexual recombination in Penicillium chrysogenum . J Gen Microbiol . 1954 ; 11 : 94 – 104 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 77. ↵ Pontecorvo G , Roper JA . Genetic analysis without sexual reproduction by means of polyploidy in Aspergillus nidulans . Proc J gen Microbiol . 6 : 7 . 78. ↵ Minuth W , Esser K . Intraspecific, interspecific, and intergeneric recombination in β-lactam producing fungi via protoplast fusion . European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol . 1983 ; 18 : 38 – 46 . OpenUrl CrossRef 79. ↵ Masel AM . Molecular evidence for chromosome transfer between biotypes of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides . Mol Plant Microbe Interact . 1996 ; 9 : 339 – 348 . OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 80. Ma L-J , van der Does HC , Borkovich KA , Coleman JJ , Daboussi M-J , Di Pietro A , et al. Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium . Nature . 2010 ; 464 : 367 – 373 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 81. Vlaardingerbroek I , Beerens B , Rose L , Fokkens L , Cornelissen BJC , Rep M . Exchange of core chromosomes and horizontal transfer of lineage-specific chromosomes in Fusarium oxysporum . Environ Microbiol . 2016 ; 18 : 3702 – 3713 . OpenUrl CrossRef 82. van Dam P , Fokkens L , Ayukawa Y , van der Gragt M , Ter Horst A , Brankovics B , et al. A mobile pathogenicity chromosome in Fusarium oxysporum for infection of multiple cucurbit species . Sci Rep . 2017 ; 7 : 9042 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 83. ↵ Habig M , Grasse AV , Müller J , Stukenbrock EH , Leitner H , Cremer S . Frequent horizontal chromosome transfer between asexual fungal insect pathogens . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2024 ; 121 : e2316284121 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 84. ↵ He C , Rusu AG , Poplawski AM , Irwin JA , Manners JM . Transfer of a supernumerary chromosome between vegetatively incompatible biotypes of the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides . Genetics . 1998 ; 150 : 1459 – 1466 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 85. ↵ Habig M , Patneedi SK , Stam R , De Fine Licht HH . Horizontal transfer of accessory chromosomes in fungi - a regulated process for exchange of genetic material? Heredity . 2025 ; doi: 10.1038/s41437–025–00746–0 . OpenUrl CrossRef 86. ↵ Hu X , Xiao G , Zheng P , Shang Y , Su Y , Zhang X , et al. Trajectory and genomic determinants of fungal-pathogen speciation and host adaptation . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2014 ; 111 : 16796 – 16801 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 87. ↵ Xu J , Vilgalys R , Mitchell TG . Multiple gene genealogies reveal recent dispersion and hybridization in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans . Mol Ecol . 2000 ; 9 : 1471 – 1481 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted March 06, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer Andrew S. Urquhart , Samuel O’Donnell , Emile Gluck-Thaler , Aaron A. Vogan bioRxiv 2025.02.28.640899; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640899 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools A natural mechanism of eukaryotic horizontal gene transfer Andrew S. Urquhart , Samuel O’Donnell , Emile Gluck-Thaler , Aaron A. Vogan bioRxiv 2025.02.28.640899; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640899 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Evolutionary Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7636) Biochemistry (17704) Bioengineering (13898) Bioinformatics (41967) Biophysics (21460) Cancer Biology (18599) Cell Biology (25525) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13384) Ecology (19909) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24326) Genetics (15613) Genomics (22512) Immunology (17740) Microbiology (40423) Molecular Biology (17191) Neuroscience (88645) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2835) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7646) Plant Biology (15158) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0