Full text
2,031 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Ecological fieldwork poses heightened risks for LGBTQIA+ scientists due to inadequate safety protocols and identity-based vulnerabilities. Best practices to improve safety for queer field researchers exist, yet over 50% of LGBTQIA+ field scientists report feeling unsupported, with structural and cultural barriers unaddressed. Our team of 15 researchers from the University of California developed the Queer and Trans Field Safety Assessment: an example-based tool designed to support inclusive field environments. Drawing from best practices in field safety literature, the assessment offers a structured checklist that addresses safety needs before, during, and after fieldwork across four key categories: climate, protocols, training, and accessibility. This paper outlines the assessment’s development and intended applications for field teams, field courses, field stations, and research labs. By offering a concrete tool, we hope to bridge the gap between recommendations and implementation in field safety and promote the inclusion and well-being of queer and trans field researchers.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W360
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences
LGBTQIA+, fieldwork, Ecology, safety, queer, trans
Published: 2025-11-11 23:44
Last Updated: 2025-11-11 23:44
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data and code used in this study are publicly available and archived in Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17531742) and are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/rsteinitz/qtifs). This complies with ESA’s Open Research Policy.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.