The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State

The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State Christine Loftus, Pamela Lim, Jan Capps, Jeffry Shirai, Maria Tchong-French, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Trials → Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract BACKGROUND: For children with asthma, exposure to indoor air pollution increases the risk of a serious asthma exacerbation, which can be life-threatening. Interventions aimed at improving indoor air quality, including use of a portable air cleaner with a high-efficiency particle air (HEPA) filter, may reduce this risk; however, the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of HEPA air cleaners varies, and more research in various settings is needed. METHODS: In collaboration with a community health worker (CHW) delivered asthma education program, we are conducting a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of HEPA air cleaners to improve indoor air quality and child asthma health in South King County of Washington State, a vulnerable community impacted by air pollution from airports and highway traffic. A key feature of the Airports, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) design is extensive integration of CHWs, including CHWs recruited from community-based organizations, into multiple aspects of the trial protocol. We aim to recruit up to N=60 children with asthma, randomized into intervention and less effective filtration (control) groups in a 1:1 ratio, conduct baseline assessments of indoor air quality and airway health, and collect repeated assessments of air quality and airway health during a three-month intervention period as well as after the trial concludes. Primary effectiveness outcomes are concentration of indoor air pollution during the intervention period and two measures of child airway health: change in asthma control score pre- and post-intervention and incidence of asthma symptoms during the intervention period. Several secondary outcomes related to air quality and child health will be explored as well. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first trial of indoor air filtration and pediatric asthma health in a community highly impacted by airport-related air pollution. The close collaboration with a CHW-delivered asthma program is also unique and important for future translation of results to future public health programming. Study findings will inform future approaches to integrate HEPA air cleaners into existing CHW asthma education programs in this and similar communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025). Asthma community health workers indoor air intervention outdoor air pollution Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 INTRODUCTION Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood, with an estimated prevalence of 6.5% in U.S. children under 18 years old in 2021. 1 The prevalence varies substantially across subpopulations and is generally higher for minoritized groups and underinsured families. 2 For example, 12.5% of non-Hispanic Black children in the US have asthma, nearly twice the rate of other racial and ethnic groups. 1 Children with poorly controlled asthma are more susceptible to episodic, acute exacerbations (i.e., asthma “attacks”). These exacerbations can be serious and even life-threatening, resulting in unscheduled clinic visits, emergency room (ER) admissions, or hospitalizations. 2 In 2013 alone, pediatric asthma in the U.S. cost an estimated $ 5.92 billion in healthcare services. 3 Poorly controlled asthma also has significant impacts on child and caregiver quality of life. School-aged children with poorly controlled asthma miss more school days than children without asthma, and their caregivers also miss more workdays than those of children without asthma. 4 One well-established trigger of asthma exacerbations is exposure to outdoor and indoor air pollutants, which can cause short-term increases in airway inflammation and lead to acute bronchospasm. 5 – 10 Exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), emitted by vehicles and aircraft with combustion engines, is especially widespread. TRAP consists of complex mixtures of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter (PM) of various sizes and chemical composition, and other components. 11 Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns or smaller, PM 2.5 , has been extensively researched in studies of air pollution health effects, including pediatric airway health. 12 , 13 Previous work has attributed 18–42% of asthma cases to TRAP exposure, with urban areas experiencing twice the burden of rural locations. 14 TRAP mixtures near airports are elevated in ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), particles of 0.1 microns or smaller, a pollutant of emerging concern for child health. 15 UFPs are relatively understudied compared to larger particulates due to challenges in monitoring and predicting UFPs, though recent evidence suggests that UFPs can penetrate deep into respiratory tracts due to smaller particulate sizes, increasing risk of exacerbations for individuals with asthma. 16 Children spend a significant amount of time indoors, and exposure to indoor air pollution is another significant risk factor for pediatric asthma morbidity. 17 , 18 Indoor air pollution results from the infiltration of outdoor pollutants to indoor environments, as well as from indoor sources, including cooking, heating, smoking or vaping, candles or incense, use of cleaning products, pesticide applications, pets, pests, carpets and bedding. Notably, the concentrations of air contaminants indoors can exceed those in the ambient outdoor air in some conditions. 19 – 23 Sociodemographic disparities in indoor air pollution exposures are well-documented, attributable to inadequate ventilation; presence of mold, mildew or pests; and other factors. 24 More interventions supporting parents and children in reducing air pollution exposure are needed, especially those feasible to implement in low-resource communities. One such intervention is home-based asthma education programs administered by community health workers (CHWs), frontline public health workers who are trusted members of and/or have a close understanding of the community served. 25 , 26 In asthma education sessions, CHWs deliver education about reducing environmental asthma triggers, including air pollution, and providing materials such as dust mite covers and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter vacuum cleaners and referring clients to resources such as smoking cessation and weatherization programs, as appropriate. 27 They also support communication with their clients’ schools, landlords, and healthcare providers. CHW-delivered asthma programs have been demonstrated to be effective at decreasing pediatric asthma symptoms, asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations, limitations on daytime activities, and missed school days. 25 , 28 – 32 Another intervention for improving the health of children with asthma is the use of HEPA portable air cleaners. 33 – 44 As reviewed recently, air cleaners with filters can substantially reduce indoor PM 2.5 and other particulates in real-world conditions. 45 , 46 Some research suggests that use of indoor air cleaners may also improve respiratory health for adults and children, but there are some inconsistencies between studies. 47 Indoor air cleaners have important limitations. The cost of an air cleaner, the replacement HEPA filters, and electricity for continuous operation can be a barrier for some families. 47 , 48 Short- and long-term adherence to air cleaner use is mixed across studies. 39 , 49 , 50 Also, the efficacy of air cleaners varies by pollutant, housing characteristics, study setting, and adherence to air cleaner use. More research on air cleaner effectiveness in diverse settings is needed. 47 To the best of our knowledge, there has been no study of the effectiveness of air cleaners with HEPA filters to address poor indoor air quality and pediatric asthma health in neighborhoods impacted by airport-related air pollution. OBJECTIVES In the Airport, Air quality and Asthma (AAA) research study, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the use of air cleaners with HEPA filters can effectively reduce indoor air pollution and improve airway health for children with asthma living near a major airport. We hypothesize that the intervention will be associated with lower concentrations of indoor PM 2.5 , improved asthma control, and lower incidence of airway symptoms. This study is a collaboration with a county health department, leveraging an established CHW-delivered asthma education program for support on participant recruitment, community engagement, and data collection. By conducting the trial before initiation of the asthma education program, we aim to distinguish any beneficial impacts of HEPA air cleaners from those of the asthma education intervention, a challenge in prior similar studies. 44 The AAA research study will also serve as an example of a community-engaged research project centered on partnership between academia and a local health department, with CHWs serving as important community liaisons. METHODS Trial design and study overview The design is a parallel group, two-arm randomized superiority trial. In brief, participating households are block randomized to either an intervention group or a lower quality filter group in a 1:1 ratio overall and further balanced 1:1 within groups by household smoking status, defined as reported presence versus absence of smoking household members. At the start of the trial, an indoor air cleaner is set up in the bedroom of the participating child. The two arms of the study are distinguished by the type of filters included in the air cleaner. Air cleaners in intervention group homes are outfitted with a set of three filters (pre-filter, activated carbon filter, and HEPA filter) while those in the less effective filter group receive an air cleaner with only a pre-filter. This comparator is appropriate because very coarse particles, including pet dander and dust, will be filtered, but fine particulates, such PM 2.5 , will not; this allows us to test the potential effect of HEPA filtration specifically. Using a less effective filtration blinds participants to intervention status, mitigating possible bias in reported outcomes. All households are followed for a three-month observation period that coincides with administration of the intervention. The AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025). Study setting The study is set in South King County, Washington, in the communities surrounding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Fig. 1). This region has a lower median income and a higher percentage of people of color than the rest of the county. Roughly three-fourths (74.8%) of the county’s Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander residents and the majority of its Black/African American (72.7%) and Hispanic/Latino (57.6%) residents live in this area. 51 has a relatively high exposure to road and air traffic pollutants, including PM 2.5 and UFP, due to emissions associated with the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Boeing Field (a smaller regional airport), and a high density of busy roadways and highways. In 2022, the asthma hospitalization rate for children in this region was 57% higher than for the rest of the county (59.9 vs. 38.0 per 100,000); for adults, the rate was 80% higher (26.2 vs. 14.6 per 100,000). 52 , 53 Collaborations with local health department and community-based organizations The AAA research study is a collaboration between the University of Washington and the Public Health-Seattle & King County Asthma Program, a CHW-administered asthma intervention program based on the “Healthy Homes” model that has supported King County families for over 20 years. 30 In 2024, the asthma program was awarded funds from the Washington state legislature for the Airports, Air quality, and Asthma (AAA) Initiative. This initiative funded both the AAA research study and a significant expansion of the King County CHW Asthma Program to serve high-need communities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. To increase the program’s capacity and better serve these communities, the AAA Initiative recruited and funded four community-based organizations (CBOs) to train and deploy CHWs. The four CBOs, African Community Housing & Development, Cultivate South Park, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, and Villa Comunitaria, each had well-established CHW programs and deep connections with the diverse populations within the focus geography. The African Community Housing & Development empowers the community of African Diaspora immigrants, refugees, and their descendants by building culturally rooted health and housing stability through economic development, legal support, resource navigation, holistic education, and access to cultural arts and traditions. Cultivate South Park is a resident-led, asset-based community development organization identifying, connecting, and celebrating neighborhood gifts in the South Park neighborhood. Lutheran Community Services Northwest enhances health outcomes through partnerships, specialty medical and mental health access, health education, and culturally sensitive case management for their largely immigrant and refugee clients. Villa Comunitaria serves predominately Spanish-speaking families in economic development, citizenship and voter education, healthy communities, skills and leadership, and systems navigation. The CHWs in these organizations live within the target communities and share the population’s language and racial/ethnic background. They were trained and mentored on how to provide direct services by the experienced CHWs in the King County CHW Asthma Program. The King County CHW Asthma Program and CBOs support the AAA research study in several ways. The CHWs facilitate recruitment and enrollment into the study, communicate with research participants, attend home visits at the beginning and end of the study, and provide culturally knowledgeable facilitation between participants and the research staff. This integration of the King County CHW Asthma Program and the research study is an important strength of the AAA approach because recruitment into the Asthma Program and the research study are conducted in parallel. The relationship between the CHWs and participating families is reinforced through the dual roles of the CHW, in participating on the research team and in administering the King County CHW Asthma Program intervention. The CHWs also received additional education and training in environmental health from the AAA research team, including interactive training sessions on environmental justice and air pollution, with a specific focus on issues affecting the study region. CHWs were also trained on research procedures, including how to protect personally identifiable information and use of REDCap for data collection. 54 , 55 The AAA research team collaborated with the CHWs to design a communication strategy, including low-burden and integrative methods for scheduling home visits. The CHWs also provided feedback on study materials, including surveys and other documents, providing a valuable perspective from the communities they serve. Participant eligibility criteria Children with asthma and one caregiver in the same household were recruited for participation in the AAA research study. Figure 2 displays the timeline of all activities, starting from screening. Inclusion criteria were: child is 6–12 years old with health care provider-diagnosed asthma; caregiver is comfortable participating in all study activities in English, including communicating with study staff by phone and completing online surveys, and is familiar with the child’s daily asthma health; residence within 10 miles of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as determined by zip code; child resides in caregiver’s home at least five nights a week on a regular basis; and no plans to move in the next three months. Participants were excluded if the child was determined to have severe asthma at baseline, because participation in the research study requires up to a 4-month delay in initiation of the King County CHW Asthma Program. Severe asthma was defined in consultation with pediatric pulmonologists to be caregiver-reported asthma symptoms every day over the past 14 days and/or two or more inpatient hospitalizations for asthma in the past 12 months. Households were excluded if there were multiple individuals with asthma eligible for the King County CHW Asthma Program if any of the household members had severe asthma. Recruitment, participant consent/assent, and ethics review Enrollment into the AAA research study began June 1, 2024, and was ongoing at the time of this report. The target enrollment is N = 60 child-caregiver pairs. Recruitment is implemented as part of the referral protocol for the King County CHW Asthma Program (Fig. 3). Potential new Asthma Program clients are self-referred, referred by a health care provider, or referred by a caretaker. Each new referral is assigned to a CHW, who calls the client or a caregiver within three business days. If the individual with asthma being referred is a child 6–12 years old and lives within the focus geography, the CHW asks the caregiver permission to screen for eligibility for the AAA research study. Those who are not interested in the research opportunity or who are determined to be ineligible proceed directly to enrollment in the King County CHW Asthma Program, conducted by an AAA study coordinator. Caregivers who expressed interest in enrolling are asked by the coordinator to review and sign an online consent form and to support the enrolled child in an assent process, which includes a video describing the study. The CHW then schedules a baseline home visit for the AAA research study. All research protocols, including the consent and assent procedures and materials, were reviewed and approved by the UW Institutional Review Board and the Research Administration and Review Committee of Public Health-Seattle King County. Confidentiality of identifiers is ensured by use of a HIPAA compliant data collection platform (REDCap). Participants are offered monetary incentives for participation, distributed after the first home visit and after the second home visit, and they are allowed to keep the air cleaner and a HEPA filter replacement kit at the end of the research study. Participant safety monitoring Participant safety monitoring includes weekly review of caregiver reports of child airway symptoms (see below). Children who have 2 or more weeks of daily symptoms may experience uncontrolled, severe asthma. When this occurs, the caregiver is contacted to confirm the responses and discuss the child’s current asthma health. Researchers then present the individual case to the pediatrician consulting with the asthma education program to determine whether the child can continue participating in the research protocol. Trial timeline Figure 4 shows the timeline of research activities for each participant. Following recruitment into the AAA research study and allocation to treatment groups, pre-intervention (i.e., baseline) data collection of effectiveness outcomes is conducted through surveys and indoor air monitoring. A three-month observation period begins after initiation of the intervention and includes longitudinal data collection (continued indoor air monitoring and caregiver surveys on child asthma symptoms). At the end of the observation period, the baseline assessment of child asthma control is repeated. All families are offered the opportunity to enroll in the King County CHW Asthma Program after the AAA research study ends. Allocation procedures After enrollment, each child is randomized to the intervention or less effective filter group using the REDCap Randomization Module by a study coordinator. Participants are block-randomized based on household smoking status, to ensure an approximately equal ratio of smoking and nonsmoking households in the two groups. Smoking is a very strong determinant of indoor air quality as well as child airway health, and balancing groups by smoking can reduce the influence of residual confounding in the case that randomization does not achieve balance between the groups. We chose not to exclude households with smokers because that would reduce the generalizability of study findings. When two children in one household were enrolled in the research study, both were randomized to the same group. Participants and CHWs are blinded to intervention status. The research team, including those who attend the home visit or manage and analyze data, are not blinded. Protocols for unblinding in the course of the trial were deemed unnecessary and not established. Baseline data collection (pre-intervention) Pre-intervention data collection included surveys and indoor air monitoring, to describe the study population and estimate baseline levels of intervention outcomes. Baseline surveys Caregivers complete an online baseline survey after enrollment. Survey topics include family sociodemographics, health behaviors, child airway health history, access to health care, asthma medication use, and features of the indoor environment. Baseline surveys include the Child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), which the caregiver completes in collaboration with the child. 56–58 The C-ACT is a short seven-question survey used to characterize child asthma control based on parent and child report of symptoms over the prior 30 days. The C-ACT has been validated for ages 4-11 years old and shown to have good psychometric properties. 56–58 A C-ACT score is calculated based on responses, ranging from 0 to 27, with higher values reflecting better asthma control, and a score of 19 or lower considered to reflect inadequate, or “poor,” control. 57 Study team staff review responses on the baseline survey to address missing data or participant confusion during the study visits. Baseline home visit AAA research study team members and the CHW assigned to the family conduct a home visit after enrollment. Attendance of the caregiver but not the child is required. At the start of the visit, the CHW introduces the research study team staff to the participants and requests permission to enter the home, including the child’s bedroom. The visit protocol includes an overview of study activities and discussion of participant’s questions or concerns, if any; set-up of the air cleaner, air monitor, and energy data logger in the child’s bedroom (details below); completion of the baseline survey and/or review of any questions that require additional clarification, if necessary; and demonstration of the weekly asthma symptom surveys, with completion of the first weekly survey. A brief inspection of the child’s bedroom includes measurement of its dimensions, description of carpet and fabric-covered items in the bedroom, and documentation of any existing air cleaner in the room. While the AAA research study team is setting up equipment, the CHW engages with the caregiver (and child, if present). Topics may include the family’s experience with asthma and asthma symptoms, future opportunities for individualized asthma education and management, and relevant services and programs offered by the CHW’s community-based organization (e.g., housing services and food security programs). Intervention: Air cleaner installation and operation During the baseline home visit, a Winix 9800 air cleaner is installed in the child’s bedroom. The Winix 9800 is a true HEPA air cleaner that has been Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Verifide® for rooms that are 500 square feet in size. The air cleaner has a washable fine mesh pre-filter that captures large airborne particles, an activated carbon filter that reduces volatile organic compounds and odors, and a true HEPA filter that captures 99.99% of airborne allergens as small as 0.003 microns in size. Households randomized to the intervention group (arm 1) receive an air cleaner with a pre-filter, carbon filter, and HEPA air filter pre-installed while those in the less effective filter group (arm 2) receive an air cleaner with only the pre-filter. Each air cleaner is connected to an Onset® HOBO® UX120-018 plug load data logger which measures and records the power and energy consumption of the air cleaner (energy logger), which will be employed to assess use of the air filter. With input from the caregiver, the field team places the air cleaner in the child’s bedroom. Air cleaner placement is mainly based on the location and availability of a power outlet. If possible, the air cleaner and PurpleAir air monitor (described below) are placed on opposite sides of the bedroom to ensure sampling from well-mixed room air. The caregiver is instructed in the handling and operation of the air cleaner, encouraged to keep the fan on during the full 3-month study period, and told that typical fan speeds at night are low or medium fan speed. When the air cleaner is first turned on, the default setting is automatic mode, in which the air cleaner will automatically increase fan speed based on an internal particle counter. The caregiver is also instructed not to move or open the air cleaner, not to disconnect the data logger, and that there is no need to change any of the filters during the study period. The caregiver is asked to keep the air cleaner off for a week after the baseline home visit for the collection of pre-intervention air pollution concentrations. A sticker is placed on the air cleaner as a reminder of the date, and the CHW also contacts the caregiver on that date to confirm the air cleaner is turned on. We employ several strategies to improve adherence to the intervention protocols. Protocols are discussed with the study team, including the trusted CHW, in person at the baseline home visit, with demonstration of the equipment and with opportunities for the participant to ask questions. As described below, caregivers complete weekly surveys, which include questions about air cleaner use. In this way, they are reminded of the protocol and prompted to continue using the cleaner and, they also have a convenient opportunity to report problems with the devices if they have any. Adherence is monitored using the energy loggers as well as through weekly surveys, on which caregivers report frequency of use over the prior seven days. Participants were not asked to restrict engagement in any other interventions or health care for their child during the trial. Longitudinal data collection (observation period): Indoor air monitoring and weekly symptom surveys A three-month observation period begins the day that the caregiver confirms initiation of air cleaner operation. During this period, the caregivers are encouraged to use the air cleaner continuously. Longitudinal measures of indoor air quality and child airway health are collected throughout this period. Indoor air monitoring of PM 2.5 is conducted with a PurpleAir Zen air quality monitor, installed in the child’s bedroom during the first home visit, affixed to the wall or atop a shelf, depending on the availability of space. The monitor collects PM 2.5 , ambient temperature and relative humidity at 5-minute intervals, stored on the device (via microSD card) and downloaded after the monitor is retrieved at the end-of-study home visit. Data will be uploaded to study drives, grouped by daily measurement clusters. Completeness of the raw data will be assessed (e.g., percentage of expected data points), and quality assurance protocols will be applied. These protocols include removal of values with low within-room correlation (r < 0.7), exclusion of days with zero variation in measurements, and attenuation of extreme values through Winsorizing within each participant monitoring period. Longitudinal child airway health is characterized through brief online surveys sent to caregivers on a weekly basis. Caregivers report the number of days in the prior week on which the child was coughing, wheezing, had shortness of breath, was awakened at night due to asthma and used asthma quick relief medication (e.g., albuterol inhaler). 59 They are asked whether the child had an unscheduled clinic visit, an emergency room visit, or hospitalization due to asthma in the past seven days. Caregivers are also asked to report the number of nights of the past week the child spent at home and whether the child had a respiratory infection. Weekly surveys ask caregivers about whether the family experienced any issues with the indoor air cleaner and how frequently they used it in the past week. Retention and protocol for attrition or intervention deviation We used several methods to maximize retention and data completion, including integration of the Asthma Program CHW in the baseline home visit and participant communications, weekly surveys for data collection as well as outreach, and timely follow up in the case of missing data. In the case of participant drop-out or deviation from the intervention protocol (i.e., limited use of air cleaner), we will retain all outcome data and conduct sensitivity analyses with exclusion of participants or specific periods, as appropriate. End of study data collection (post-intervention): Second home visit After the observation period ends, a second home visit is scheduled. At this visit, the research team collects the air quality monitor and the energy logger. The HEPA air cleaner is also inspected and the pre-filter is cleaned by a handheld HEPA vacuum cleaner. A new black carbon is installed in air cleaners of intervention families; HEPA and carbon filters are installed in air cleaners of families in the less effective arm. All families are also provided with a new replacement filter kit and extra activated black carbon filters. The research team provides instructions for future air cleaner use and maintenance and asks about the family’s overall experience in the study and ease of use of the air cleaner. Primary and secondary intervention outcomes The effectiveness of the intervention to reduce indoor air pollution and improve the health of children with asthma is assessed through several primary and secondary outcomes. Primary outcomes related to air quality include the average indoor PM 2.5 in the child’s bedroom as well as the ratio of indoor to outdoor PM 2.5 , both averaged across the three-month intervention period. Outdoor PM 2.5 will be estimated from regional regulatory air monitors and PurpleAir sensor data, as available. Primary health outcomes include the change in child ACT score between baseline and post-intervention as well as the total count of symptom-days in the observation period, with “symptom-day” defined as a day on which any asthma symptom or medication use was reported. Several secondary health outcomes will be analyzed in exploratory analyses, including: count of unscheduled clinic visits, ER visits and hospitalizations for asthma during the observation period; count of symptom-days, broken down by different type of symptom (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath) and count of asthma medication use days; and count of respiratory infections in the observation period. Data analysis plan and power calculations Descriptive analyses will be conducted to describe study population characteristics, concentration of indoor air pollutants (baseline and observation period), and child asthma health outcomes. Distributions of each variable will be summarized overall and stratified by intervention, with continuous variables presented as means, medians, standard deviations and interquartile ranges and categorical variable summarized as counts and percentages within each category. In order to evaluate completeness of randomization between the intervention and less effective groups, t-test and chi-squared tests will be conducted to determine whether there is a significant difference in characteristics between groups. All analyses of intervention effectiveness will be conducted with an intent-to-treat approach. The effect of the intervention on indoor air quality will be estimated through multivariate regression with robust standard errors, with average calibrated pollutant concentration as the dependent variable and group status (intervention or less effective arm) as the independent variable. Regression models will include adjustment for baseline pollutant concentration, measured in the seven days prior to intervention initiation, outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations, season and any predictors of indoor air quality that are not balanced between the intervention and less effective groups. Sensitivity analyses will include repeating all analyses with exclusion of participants with relatively low compliance rates of indoor air cleaner usage, determined by self-report (weekly surveys) and energy monitor data. The effect on count of symptom-days across the intervention period will be assessed using Poisson regression with robust standard errors, with count of symptom-days during the intervention period as the dependent variable and group status as the dependent variable. 59 , 60 The regression model will be adjusted for season and for participant or home characteristics that are risk factors for asthma symptoms or exacerbations and not balanced between groups. Secondary health outcomes (count of unscheduled clinic visits, ER visits and hospitalizations for asthma during the observation period; count of symptom-days, broken down by different type of symptom (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath) and count of asthma medication use days, will be analyzed using the same approach, in separate models. The time at risk of event (i.e., symptom-days) will be estimated for each participant using the number of completed weekly surveys. In sensitivity analyses, weeks in which the child spent three or more days away from home will be excluded. The target enrollment is N = 60 children (N = 30 per arm). For all power calculation, we assumed that significant confounders of this relationship are balanced between groups by randomization or addressed by adjustment. We estimated the power to detect an effect on the primary outcome related to indoor air quality, reduction in indoor PM2.5, using a simple two-sample t-test comparing the less effective and intervention groups on the within-subject differences between baseline and post-intervention indoor PM 2.5 . Based on prior literature, 38 , 39 , 50 , 61 , 62 we estimate that the intervention effect on PM 2.5 will range from 35–60% with a coefficient of variation (CV) from 60–80%. Power was calculated for these ranges of effect size and CV in a sample size of 30 homes per arm, demonstrating sufficient power (greater than 0.80) for all scenarios. We similarly estimated the power to detect an effect on two primary outcomes related to child airway health. We estimated that a sample size of N = 60 would have power of 0.81 to detect a 2-point difference in the C-ACT associated with the intervention. We also estimated power to detect a reduction in the count of symptom-days. Assuming a Poisson distribution, a percentage of symptom days in the less effective group of 15%, a sample size of N = 60 provides power of at least 0.80 to detect an effect size of 18% or higher. Audits and approach to protocol amendments Trial conduct is reviewed and discussed by staff on a biweekly basis, independent of the sponsor. Important changes to the protocol will be discussed at these team meetings and submitted to IRBs for review as necessary. Changes that impact participants will be communicated to them via assigned CHW. Updates to the trial registry will be made as needed. Dissemination of results and data sharing Trial findings will be communicated to the sponsor in a final report. We will also return results to the community organizations in meetings and/or in written reports, based on their preferences. Findings will also be presented in publications submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Deidentified data are available upon request, pending completion and approval of a data sharing agreement with Public Health Seattle King County. The full protocol and all statistical code will also be available upon request. DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, the AAA research study is the first intervention trial evaluating the effectiveness of indoor HEPA air cleaners to improve indoor air quality and airway health for children with asthma residing in air traffic-impacted communities. The study is set in a region with relatively high exposures to traffic- and airport-related air pollution, pediatric asthma prevalence and hospitalization rates for asthma-related conditions, and socioeconomic disadvantage. Several strengths of the study increase the chances that findings can be translated to effective, feasible and sustainable asthma interventions in the future, with the ultimate objective of reducing child health inequities that result from disproportionate exposures to outdoor and indoor air pollution. 63 – 65 A notable aspect of the study design is close collaboration with the local health department and a CHW-delivered asthma program. The proposal for this research study was developed in partnership with leadership of the King County CHW Asthma Program, and all study procedures were drafted and evaluated with feedback from the CHWs who are serving the target community. Administrative staff are the first point of contact for potential research participants as they are referred to the King County Asthma Program, introducing the research opportunity to caregivers of children who are age-eligible and conducting an eligibility assessment. A CHW is then assigned to the participant and becomes their main point of contact. Recruitment has been successful to date, likely reflecting the close relationships that CHWs and participating community-based organizations can form with community members. 66 – 68 CHWs have also been integral in AAA community outreach activities, raising awareness of both the King County CHW Asthma Program and the AAA research study through a variety of mechanisms, including in-person events and social media engagement. The CHW attends AAA study home visits along with research study staff, and the same CHW initiates the King County CHW Asthma Program seamlessly after the completion of the research study whenever possible. When the entire study is finished, CHWs will participate in efforts to disseminate findings to the community. Other community-engaged research studies have successfully leveraged relationships between CHWs and other trusted advocates and the study community in similar ways. 44 , 67 , 69 There are several methodological strengths of the AAA study. A randomized controlled trial design, relatively rare in the field of environmental health, minimizes the influence of potential confounders on estimates of intervention effect. We blinded participants to intervention status by installing air cleaners with “less effective” filtration for participants not randomized to the intervention, which reduces the potential of bias in reported outcomes. Most other intervention studies of indoor air filtration in schools or homes of children with asthma did not use this approach. 38 – 44 Another strength is use of energy monitors to collect objective data on use of portable air cleaners, which allows descriptive characterizations of patterns in adherence to air cleaner use, an important factor in the effectiveness of air cleaners in reducing pediatric asthma morbidity, as well as sensitivity “per protocol” analyses, accounting for the frequency of air cleaner use. Few studies of portable air cleaners and respiratory health have utilized energy monitors, a notable limitation. 44 While the AAA study is conducted in series with a CHW-delivered asthma program, the trial was designed to evaluate the effect of portable air cleaners independent of the expected beneficial effects of the asthma program. Therefore, we conducted the trial prior to initiation of the asthma program rather than concurrently, in contrast to other studies which were challenged to distinguish beneficial effects of the intervention from that of the asthma education program. 44 , 70 The AAA study assesses multiple asthma health outcomes, including longitudinal reports of asthma symptoms and medication usage on a relatively short time scale (weekly), providing a detailed characterization of time-varying asthma health. This is important because the respiratory health of children with asthma can vary substantially from week to week, and factors such as viral infections, stress, or changes in activity can greatly influence asthma health and reduce statistical power in studies relying on a small number of respiratory health assessments (e.g., baseline and post-intervention). Repeated measurement of asthma health will provide characterization of within- and between-participant variability in health and, further, support analyses of time-varying air pollution exposure, as measured by indoor air monitors, and short-term associations with asthma symptoms and medication use. The AAA research study also faces challenges and limitations. Trial recruitment is conducted in the context of referrals into the King County CHW Asthma Program. The capacity of this program has been limited in recent years due to a shift from providing services to training and dissemination as well as impacts of the COVID pandemic. After receiving funding to expand services and the support of the contracted community-based organizations, the program had to re-initiate referral networks and outreach efforts. These factors limited the pace of trial recruitment. Despite this challenge, the integration of trial protocols into the Asthma Program is a major strength, as described above. Another potential limitation is the possibility of missing data in repeated weekly surveys for caregivers during the three-month intervention period. Surveys were designed to be low burden for participants (short and easily accessible), and staff demonstrated the surveys to caregivers at the time of the first home visit, to increase participant familiarity with longitudinal data collection. Other limitations include the exclusion of children with severe asthma, which limits generalizability of study findings; however, exclusion was necessary in order to avoid delaying health care for children most at risk of serious exacerbations. Abbreviations AAA = Airport, Air quality, and Asthma CHW = community health worker CBO = community-based organization C-ACT = child asthma control test ER = emergency room HEPA = high efficiency particulate air PM = particulate matter PM 2.5 = particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter REDCap = Research Electronic Data Capture TRAP = traffic-related air pollution UFP = ultrafine particulate matter UW = University of Washington Declarations FUNDING STATEMENT This study was funded by the Washington State Department of Health. The funder did not have a role in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication. The funder did not review or endorse any element of the study. TRIAL STATUS The AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025). Recruitment began June 1, 2024, and the estimated end of recruitment will be April 2026. Ethics approval and consent to participate The AAA study was reviewed by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board on (arch 7, 2024 (STUDY00019144) and by Public Health-Seattle King County Institutional Review Board on April 8, 2024 (RARC #24-751). Written, informed consent to participate is collected from all participants before enrollment. Participating children provide assent with support of a parent. Consent for publication The current paper describes a trial protocol only and as such does not include pilot data. This manuscript does not contain individual personal data from patients. A model consent form is available upon request. Availability of data and materials De-identified information on indoor and outdoor air quality over the course of the study period will be shared through an open-source publication. De-identified weekly symptom questionnaire will be shared, however identifiable participant information including age, gender/sex and home address will be redacted. A data management plan is available through dmptool.org, allowing researchers to identify and request data elements that are not available through open-source mechanisms. Access to the full identified dataset will be maintained by Dr. Austin, and requests to provide de-identified components beyond what is publicly available will be through direct request. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding Funding was provided through a grant from the Washington State Department of Health. Additional funding for exposure characterization was provided through the University of Washington (UW) Interdisciplinary Center for Exposures, Diseases, Genomics, and Environment (EDGE) of the National Institutes of Health (P30ES007033). Funders had no authority over trial conduct. Authors' contributions EA is the lead investigator. She led the proposal and attained funding in partnership with JC. She led protocol development, supervised student and staff activities, and led development of IRB protocols. CL was the lead epidemiologist. She led manuscript preparation and contributed to study design as well as development of the proposal. JS was the lead project coordinator and co-lead field team member on the University of Washington (UW) team. He also contributed to the manuscript preparation. MTF was a project coordinator and co-lead field team member on the UW team. She coordinated IRB submission and contributed to the manuscript preparation. PL was a UW field team member and contributed to the manuscript preparation. JC contributed to the development of the proposal and study protocol. She oversaw participating CHWs and study recruitment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the support of Giaan Nguyen for coordination and communication with families and CHWs, and the community-based organizations, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, African Community Housing & Development, Cultivate South Park and Villa Comunitaria, who participated in the AAA initiative. We also thank the research participants and their families for their contributions to our study. References Pate CA, Zahran HS. The Status of Asthma in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jul 18;21:240005. Wendt JK, Symanski E, Du XL. Estimation of Asthma Incidence Among Low-Income Children in Texas: A Novel Approach Using Medicaid Claims Data. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2012 Oct 15;176(8):744–50. Perry R, Braileanu G, Palmer T, Stevens P. The Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in the United States: Literature Review of Current Evidence. PharmacoEconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):155–67. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V, Kavati A, Navaratnam P, Friedman HS, Ortiz B. Health Disparities Among Children with Asthma in the United States by Place of Residence. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2019 Jan;7(1):148–55. Esposito S, Tenconi R, Lelii M, Preti V, Nazzari E, Consolo S, et al. Possible molecular mechanisms linking air pollution and asthma in children. BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Dec;14(1):31. Jerrett M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Künzli N, Avol E, et al. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Asthma Onset in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study with Individual Exposure Measurement. Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Oct;116(10):1433–8. Khreis H, Kelly C, Tate J, Parslow R, Lucas K, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International. 2017 Mar;100:1–31. Hauptman M, Gaffin JM, Petty CR, Sheehan WJ, Lai PS, Coull B, et al. Proximity to major roadways and asthma symptoms in the School Inner-City Asthma Study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020 Jan;145(1):119-126.e4. Lenssen ES, Janssen NAH, Oldenwening M, Meliefste K, De Jonge D, Kamstra RJM, et al. Beyond the Runway: Respiratory health effects of ultrafine particles from aviation in children. Environment International. 2024 Jun;188:108759. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Lurmann F, Kuenzli N, Gilliland F, Peters J, et al. Childhood Asthma and Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide: Epidemiology. 2005 Nov;16(6):737–43. Health Effects Institute. Health Effects Institute. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. HEI Special Report 17. Boston: Health Effects Institute; 2010. Khreis H, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Childhood Asthma: Recent Advances and Remaining Gaps in the Exposure Assessment Methods. IJERPH. 2017 Mar 17;14(3):312. Shao J, Wheeler AJ, Zosky GR, Johnston FH. Long-term impacts of prenatal and infant exposure to fine particulate matter on wheezing and asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Epidemiology. 2019 Apr;3(2):e042. Alotaibi R, Bechle M, Marshall JD, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Traffic related air pollution and the burden of childhood asthma in the contiguous United States in 2000 and 2010. Environment International. 2019 Jun;127:858–67. Blanco MN, Gassett A, Gould T, Doubleday A, Slager DL, Austin E, et al. Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign. Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Aug 16;56(16):11460–72. Evans KA, Halterman JS, Hopke PK, Fagnano M, Rich DQ. Increased ultrafine particles and carbon monoxide concentrations are associated with asthma exacerbation among urban children. Environmental Research. 2014 Feb;129:11–9. Nazaroff WW, Goldstein AH. Indoor chemistry: research opportunities and challenges. Indoor Air. 2015 Aug;25(4):357–61. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2001 Jul 1;11(3):231–52. Fawzy A, Woo H, Raju S, Belz DC, Putcha N, Williams MS, et al. Indoor particulate matter concentrations and air cleaner intervention association with biomarkers in former smokers with COPD. Environmental Research. 2024 Feb;243:117874. Eom SY, Kim A, Lee JH, Kim SM, Lee SY, Hwang KK, et al. Positive Effect of Air Purifier Intervention on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Crossover Intervention Trial. IJERPH. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7078. Enkhbat U, Gombojav E, Banzrai C, Batsukh S, Boldbaatar B, Enkhtuya E, et al. Portable HEPA filter air cleaner use during pregnancy and children’s autistic behaviors at four years of age: The UGAAR randomized controlled trial. Environment International. 2022 Oct;168:107432. Liu S, Chen J, Zhao Q, Song X, Shao D, Meliefste K, et al. Cardiovascular benefits of short-term indoor air filtration intervention in elderly living in Beijing: An extended analysis of BIAPSY study. Environmental Research. 2018 Nov;167:632–8. Barkjohn KK, Norris C, Cui X, Fang L, Zheng T, Schauer JJ, et al. Real‐time measurements of PM 2.5 and ozone to assess the effectiveness of residential indoor air filtration in Shanghai homes. Indoor Air. 2021 Jan;31(1):74–87. Adamkiewicz G, Zota AR, Fabian MP, Chahine T, Julien R, Spengler JD, et al. Moving Environmental Justice Indoors: Understanding Structural Influences on Residential Exposure Patterns in Low-Income Communities. Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(S1):S238–45. Postma J, Karr C, Kieckhefer G. Community Health Workers and Environmental Interventions for Children with Asthma: A Systematic Review. Journal of Asthma. 2009 Jan;46(6):564–76. American Public Health Association. Community Health Workers [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.apha.org/apha-communities/member-sections/community-health-workers Elkugia N, Crocker ME, Stout JW, Bolt K, Weiner BJ, Kramer CB. Development of an Asthma Home-Visit Training Program for Community Health Workers and Their Supervisors in Washington State. Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;9:674843. Parker EA, Israel BA, Robins TG, Mentz G, Xihong Lin, Brakefield-Caldwell W, et al. Evaluation of Community Action Against Asthma: A Community Health Worker Intervention to Improve Children’s Asthma-Related Health by Reducing Household Environmental Triggers for Asthma. Health Educ Behav. 2008 Jun;35(3):376–95. Campbell JD, Brooks M, Hosokawa P, Robinson J, Song L, Krieger J. Community Health Worker Home Visits for Medicaid-Enrolled Children With Asthma: Effects on Asthma Outcomes and Costs. Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2366–72. Krieger JW, Takaro TK, Song L, Weaver M. The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Intervention to Decrease Exposure to Indoor Asthma Triggers. Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):652–9. Jonas JA, Leu CS, Reznik M. A randomized controlled trial of a community health worker delivered home-based asthma intervention to improve pediatric asthma outcomes. Journal of Asthma. 2022 Feb 1;59(2):395–406. Fox P, Porter PG, Lob SH, Boer JH, Rocha DA, Adelson JW. Improving Asthma-Related Health Outcomes Among Low-Income, Multiethnic, School-aged Children: Results of a Demonstration Project That Combined Continuous Quality Improvement and Community Health Worker Strategies. Pediatrics. 2007 Oct 1;120(4):e902–11. Lee GH, Kim JH, Kim S, Lee S, Lim DH. Effects of Indoor Air Purifiers on Children with Asthma. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(4):310. Maung TZ, Bishop JE, Holt E, Turner AM, Pfrang C. Indoor Air Pollution and the Health of Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter (PM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Their Effects on Children and People with Pre-Existing Lung Disease. IJERPH. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8752. Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. Improving indoor air quality, health and performance within environments where people live, travel, learn and work. Atmospheric Environment. 2019 Mar;200:90–109. Xu Y, Raja S, Ferro AR, Jaques PA, Hopke PK, Gressani C, et al. Effectiveness of heating, ventilation and air conditioning system with HEPA filter unit on indoor air quality and asthmatic children’s health. Building and Environment. 2010 Feb;45(2):330–7. Carmona N, Seto E, Gould TR, Rasyid E, Shirai JH, Cummings B, et al. Indoor Air Quality Intervention in Schools: Effectiveness of a Portable HEPA Filter Deployment in Five Schools Impacted by Roadway and Aircraft Pollution Sources. Atmosphere. 2022 Oct 5;13(10):1623. Butz AM, Matsui EC, Breysse P, Curtin-Brosnan J, Eggleston PA, Diette G, et al. A Randomized Trial of Air Cleaners and a Health Coach to Improve Indoor Air Quality for Inner-City Children With Asthma and Secondhand Smoke Exposure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug 1;165(8):741. Eggleston PA, Butz A, Rand C, Curtin-Brosnan J, Kanchanaraksa S, Swartz L, et al. Home environmental intervention in inner-city asthma: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 2005 Dec;95(6):518–24. Jhun I, Gaffin JM, Coull BA, Huffaker MF, Petty CR, Sheehan WJ, et al. School Environmental Intervention to Reduce Particulate Pollutant Exposures for Children with Asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2017 Jan;5(1):154-159.e3. Lanphear BP, Hornung RW, Khoury J, Yolton K, Lierl M, Kalkbrenner A. Effects of HEPA Air Cleaners on Unscheduled Asthma Visits and Asthma Symptoms for Children Exposed to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke. Pediatrics. 2011 Jan 1;127(1):93–101. Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, O’Connor GT, Kattan M, Evans R, et al. Results of a Home-Based Environmental Intervention among Urban Children with Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1068–80. Noonan CW, Semmens EO, Smith P, Harrar SW, Montrose L, Weiler E, et al. Randomized Trial of Interventions to Improve Childhood Asthma in Homes with Wood-burning Stoves. Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 22;125(9):097010. Drieling RL, Sampson PD, Krenz JE, Tchong French MI, Jansen KL, Massey AE, et al. Randomized trial of a portable HEPA air cleaner intervention to reduce asthma morbidity among Latino children in an agricultural community. Environ Health. 2022 Dec;21(1):1. Cheek E, Guercio V, Shrubsole C, Dimitroulopoulou S. Portable air purification: Review of impacts on indoor air quality and health. Science of The Total Environment. 2021 Apr;766:142585. Ebrahimifakhar A, Poursadegh M, Hu Y, Yuill DP, Luo Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis of field studies of portable air cleaners: Performance, user behavior, and by-product emissions. Science of The Total Environment. 2024 Feb;912:168786. Robertson NM, Qiu A, Raju S, McCormack MC, Koehler K. Cleaning indoor air—what works for respiratory health: An updated literature review and recommendations. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2024 Oct;154(4):847–60. Adibi A, Barn P, Shellington EM, Harvard S, Johnson KM, Carlsten C. High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters for Preventing Wildfire-related Asthma Complications: A Cost-Effectiveness Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 15;209(2):175–84. Cox J, Isiugo K, Ryan P, Grinshpun SA, Yermakov M, Desmond C, et al. Effectiveness of a portable air cleaner in removing aerosol particles in homes close to highways. Indoor Air. 2018 Nov;28(6):818–27. Batterman S, Du L, Mentz G, Mukherjee B, Parker E, Godwin C, et al. Particulate matter concentrations in residences: an intervention study evaluating stand-alone filters and air conditioners: Air filters and air conditioners in homes. Indoor Air. 2012 Jun;22(3):235–52. Johnson K, Solet D, Serry K. Community Health and Airport Operations Related Noise and Air Pollution: Report to the Legislature in Response to Washington State HOUSE BILL 1109. Public Health Seattle & King County; Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation Unit; 2020 Dec. Washington State Office of Financial Management. Population estimates [Internet]. Washington State Office of Financial Management. [cited 2025 Feb 19]. Available from: https://ofm.wa.gov/washington-data-research/population-demographics/population-estimates Washington State Department of Health. Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) [Internet]. Washington State Department of Health. [cited 2025 Feb 19]. Available from: https://doh.wa.gov/data-statistical-reports/healthcare-washington/hospital-and-patient-data/hospital-discharge-data-chars Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009 Apr;42(2):377–81. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019 Jul;95:103208. Bime C, Gerald JK, Wei CY, Holbrook JT, Teague WG, Wise RA, et al. Measurement characteristics of the childhood Asthma-Control Test and a shortened, child-only version. npj Prim Care Resp Med. 2016 Oct 20;26(1):16075. Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, et al. Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007 Apr;119(4):817–25. Chu F, Kappel N, Akel M, Press VG, Alexander JT, Volerman A. Validity of the Childhood Asthma Control Test in diverse populations: A systematic review. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2023 May;58(5):1322–36. Bryant-Stephens T, Kurian C, Guo R, Zhao H. Impact of a Household Environmental Intervention Delivered by Lay Health Workers on Asthma Symptom Control in Urban, Disadvantaged Children With Asthma. Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(S3):S657–65. Janevic MR, Stoll S, Wilkin M, Song PXK, Baptist A, Lara M, et al. Pediatric Asthma Care Coordination in Underserved Communities: A Quasiexperimental Study. Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):2012–8. Riederer AM, Krenz JE, Tchong‐French MI, Torres E, Perez A, Younglove LR, et al. Effectiveness of portable HEPA air cleaners on reducing indoor PM 2.5 and NH 3 in an agricultural cohort of children with asthma: A randomized intervention trial. Indoor Air. 2021 Mar;31(2):454–66. Pavilonis BT, Anthony TR, O’Shaughnessy PT, Humann MJ, Merchant JA, Moore G, et al. Indoor and outdoor particulate matter and endotoxin concentrations in an intensely agricultural county. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013 May;23(3):299–305. Bronte-Moreno O, González-Barcala FJ, Muñoz-Gall X, Pueyo-Bastida A, Ramos-González J, Urrutia-Landa I. Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma: A Scoping Review. Open Respiratory Archives. 2023 Apr;5(2):100229. Bryant-Stephens TC, Strane D, Robinson EK, Bhambhani S, Kenyon CC. Housing and asthma disparities. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021 Nov;148(5):1121–9. Holden KA, Lee AR, Hawcutt DB, Sinha IP. The impact of poor housing and indoor air quality on respiratory health in children. Breathe. 2023 Jun;19(2):230058. Pappalardo AA, Martin MA, Weinstein S, Pugach O, Mosnaim GS. Improving Adherence in Urban Youth With Asthma: Role of Community Health Workers. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2022 Dec;10(12):3186–93. Martin MA, Pugach O, Mosnaim G, Weinstein S, Rosales G, Roy A, et al. Community Health Worker Asthma Interventions for Children: Results From a Clinically Integrated Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (2016‒2019). Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1328–37. Coutinho MT, Subzwari SS, McQuaid EL, Koinis-Mitchell D. Community Health Workers’ Role in Supporting Pediatric Asthma Management: A Review. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology. 2020 Jun;8(2):195–210. Everhart RS, Mazzeo SE, Corona R, Holder RL, Thacker LR, Schechter MS. A community-based asthma program: Study design and methods of RVA Breathes. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2020 Oct;97:106121. Masterson EE, Younglove LB, Perez A, Torres E, Krenz JE, Tchong French MI, et al. The home air in agriculture pediatric intervention (HAPI) trial: Rationale and methods. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106085. Supplementary Files SPIRITChecklist.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Trials → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 11 Sep, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 11 Sep, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 04 Sep, 2025 First submitted to journal 03 Sep, 2025 Editorial decision: Minor revision 20 Aug, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7181465","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":513737610,"identity":"f0aaa8a4-c577-4cf2-a491-e41af7036380","order_by":0,"name":"Christine Loftus","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-7342","institution":"University of Washington","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Christine","middleName":"","lastName":"Loftus","suffix":""},{"id":513737611,"identity":"80e3dec5-20e3-4026-9fdc-88d9bea68ee9","order_by":1,"name":"Pamela Lim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Washington","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pamela","middleName":"","lastName":"Lim","suffix":""},{"id":513737612,"identity":"3136400d-05c4-4f33-9837-bbdcd6b547a9","order_by":2,"name":"Jan Capps","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Public Health - Seattle King County","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jan","middleName":"","lastName":"Capps","suffix":""},{"id":513737613,"identity":"778a363c-f94e-4bd2-9ccb-aeaa055e9d9b","order_by":3,"name":"Jeffry Shirai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Washington","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jeffry","middleName":"","lastName":"Shirai","suffix":""},{"id":513737614,"identity":"9b3e3b21-b3e3-49c6-af68-76d5251f8a42","order_by":4,"name":"Maria Tchong-French","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Washington","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"","lastName":"Tchong-French","suffix":""},{"id":513737615,"identity":"707e4028-36fc-4967-8f67-f7de554baebb","order_by":5,"name":"Elena Austin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Washington","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elena","middleName":"","lastName":"Austin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-07-22 01:36:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09286-8","type":"published","date":"2025-11-27T15:57:52+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":91841549,"identity":"b418debe-6da7-4139-9556-f4f84db974c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:01","extension":"xml","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":12504,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"trlsTRLSD2501082.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/0fc75cf3e20f5806fd027282.xml"},{"id":91841512,"identity":"17c2c501-a955-4831-840b-fedd9966801a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:52","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":985,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TRLSD250108234016.go.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/9368de342da1a18a070392f3.xml"},{"id":91841540,"identity":"22987e5e-fa0e-47fd-9750-d65a7960f5fd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:00","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":956,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TRLSD2501082Import.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/1299f6c917df768ad468dd2c.xml"},{"id":91841517,"identity":"8cdb5f8e-5435-49fe-976e-b312696a62bf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:54","extension":"xml","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":165823,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TRLSD25010821enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/c21cbffb3108c9c94356fbfd.xml"},{"id":91842964,"identity":"d6fd8333-52d9-4367-ad66-6fb9fe1d717a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 10:04:00","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1532358,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/0c6110677d0315b83b459509.png"},{"id":91841529,"identity":"a5ba69d4-59ba-4d64-80b8-fbd9226a8a14","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:57","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":110339,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/fd8d224bea9dd3699ffa6979.png"},{"id":91841542,"identity":"393e30a2-4fc8-48dc-bc3c-6ce71ab96272","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:00","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":115523,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/57ce113f127c3fb29c93f33f.png"},{"id":91841532,"identity":"2ec508ec-b8bd-4263-a0dc-002197fa5d8a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:59","extension":"jpeg","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":378653,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/cf7bdb00a3f1bcf763a7565c.jpeg"},{"id":91841554,"identity":"2c025c80-9717-4828-9126-009c0c4fb491","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:01","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":200175,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/2988c1b9a2e2472f7d8e774e.png"},{"id":91841566,"identity":"c89a295f-6598-4f5e-a7e6-381b98bb89ee","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:03","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":44066,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/905cd02bc0dbd10187fb67aa.png"},{"id":91841524,"identity":"342666c5-e0df-40a0-8d66-a34465947884","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:56","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":34437,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/4b8434ca3a185b0032e52adf.png"},{"id":91841538,"identity":"77f48edf-ae9c-49a3-97e0-1eb3c8984ab1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:00","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":98463,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/affdc9f350390480eb06f8d8.png"},{"id":91841552,"identity":"9664f62a-fbe0-4263-8af9-252cd1859056","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:01","extension":"xml","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":161934,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TRLSD25010821structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/fbb1f56609ead6119a7aaf6d.xml"},{"id":91841535,"identity":"27569a8d-f5df-4a5e-b804-42a601f9985e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:59","extension":"html","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":175030,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/60bab339c623e1fa5027a9f1.html"},{"id":91841559,"identity":"67c39914-3a80-49af-8de4-fea0b5a8b112","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:56:02","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":325321,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe AAA Study region.\u003c/strong\u003e Eligibility criteria included residence in a zip code within 10 miles of the Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International Airport, excluding one zip code that was excluded because it was the recruitment region for a separate study.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/c36ef9f137e94802ec100124.png"},{"id":91842965,"identity":"37b831af-ff82-4de0-8ff7-9df862a4c788","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 10:04:01","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":230697,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSPIRIT Diagram.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/36297a3c6a631d14a0b961ba.png"},{"id":91841526,"identity":"a9a2f751-0d55-4fc2-be15-ba4d672ad5ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:56","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":130022,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnrollment into the King County CHW Asthma Program and the AAA Research Study\u003c/strong\u003e. Recruitment for the AAA Research Study is nested within protocols for referral and enrollment into the King County Asthma Program. Referrals to the Asthma Program are screened for eligibility in the research study and – if eligible – given the opportunity to enroll. Those who do not enroll in the research study proceed to enroll in the Asthma Program. Those who participate in the research study are offered enrollment in the Asthma Program after completion of the study.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/9e3d2c0e093796c1404a0d1e.png"},{"id":91841509,"identity":"120ecb3c-1a31-42fd-ba2e-c152b7a6e10a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:51","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":279055,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAAA Research Study Participant Timeline.\u003c/strong\u003e There are three phases of data collection: pre-intervention, observation period (coinciding with intervention delivery to participants in the intervention arm), and post-intervention. Abbreviations: HEPA = high efficiency particulate air filtration; C-ACT = Child - Asthma Control Test; PH-SKC = Public Health-Seattle King County.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/b3299d3c491c7fe0c20dc57d.png"},{"id":97178727,"identity":"daec4e9e-27be-4aee-8cb0-67fc709385a7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-01 16:13:02","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1517543,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/86389119-38ba-428f-9c45-40d76b46064b.pdf"},{"id":91841507,"identity":"0c615a0b-d0a7-4836-bd3c-ae4c22747ebd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-22 09:55:51","extension":"docx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":30404,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SPIRITChecklist.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7181465/v1/9113fbf75b72161d6c98d7ad.docx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eAsthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood, with an estimated prevalence of 6.5% in U.S. children under 18 years old in 2021.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The prevalence varies substantially across subpopulations and is generally higher for minoritized groups and underinsured families.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e For example, 12.5% of non-Hispanic Black children in the US have asthma, nearly twice the rate of other racial and ethnic groups.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Children with poorly controlled asthma are more susceptible to episodic, acute exacerbations (i.e., asthma “attacks”). These exacerbations can be serious and even life-threatening, resulting in unscheduled clinic visits, emergency room (ER) admissions, or hospitalizations.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In 2013 alone, pediatric asthma in the U.S. cost an estimated \u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e5.92\u0026nbsp;billion in healthcare services.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Poorly controlled asthma also has significant impacts on child and caregiver quality of life. School-aged children with poorly controlled asthma miss more school days than children without asthma, and their caregivers also miss more workdays than those of children without asthma.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne well-established trigger of asthma exacerbations is exposure to outdoor and indoor air pollutants, which can cause short-term increases in airway inflammation and lead to acute bronchospasm.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), emitted by vehicles and aircraft with combustion engines, is especially widespread. TRAP consists of complex mixtures of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter (PM) of various sizes and chemical composition, and other components.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns or smaller, PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e, has been extensively researched in studies of air pollution health effects, including pediatric airway health.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Previous work has attributed 18–42% of asthma cases to TRAP exposure, with urban areas experiencing twice the burden of rural locations.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e TRAP mixtures near airports are elevated in ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), particles of 0.1 microns or smaller, a pollutant of emerging concern for child health.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e UFPs are relatively understudied compared to larger particulates due to challenges in monitoring and predicting UFPs, though recent evidence suggests that UFPs can penetrate deep into respiratory tracts due to smaller particulate sizes, increasing risk of exacerbations for individuals with asthma.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eChildren spend a significant amount of time indoors, and exposure to indoor air pollution is another significant risk factor for pediatric asthma morbidity.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Indoor air pollution results from the infiltration of outdoor pollutants to indoor environments, as well as from indoor sources, including cooking, heating, smoking or vaping, candles or incense, use of cleaning products, pesticide applications, pets, pests, carpets and bedding. Notably, the concentrations of air contaminants indoors can exceed those in the ambient outdoor air in some conditions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR20 CR21 CR22\" citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Sociodemographic disparities in indoor air pollution exposures are well-documented, attributable to inadequate ventilation; presence of mold, mildew or pests; and other factors.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMore interventions supporting parents and children in reducing air pollution exposure are needed, especially those feasible to implement in low-resource communities. One such intervention is home-based asthma education programs administered by community health workers (CHWs), frontline public health workers who are trusted members of and/or have a close understanding of the community served.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In asthma education sessions, CHWs deliver education about reducing environmental asthma triggers, including air pollution, and providing materials such as dust mite covers and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter vacuum cleaners and referring clients to resources such as smoking cessation and weatherization programs, as appropriate.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e They also support communication with their clients’ schools, landlords, and healthcare providers. CHW-delivered asthma programs have been demonstrated to be effective at decreasing pediatric asthma symptoms, asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations, limitations on daytime activities, and missed school days.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR29 CR30 CR31\" citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAnother intervention for improving the health of children with asthma is the use of HEPA portable air cleaners.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR34 CR35 CR36 CR37 CR38 CR39 CR40 CR41 CR42 CR43\" citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e As reviewed recently, air cleaners with filters can substantially reduce indoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e and other particulates in real-world conditions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Some research suggests that use of indoor air cleaners may also improve respiratory health for adults and children, but there are some inconsistencies between studies.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Indoor air cleaners have important limitations. The cost of an air cleaner, the replacement HEPA filters, and electricity for continuous operation can be a barrier for some families.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Short- and long-term adherence to air cleaner use is mixed across studies.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Also, the efficacy of air cleaners varies by pollutant, housing characteristics, study setting, and adherence to air cleaner use. More research on air cleaner effectiveness in diverse settings is needed.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e To the best of our knowledge, there has been no study of the effectiveness of air cleaners with HEPA filters to address poor indoor air quality and pediatric asthma health in neighborhoods impacted by airport-related air pollution.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOBJECTIVES\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the Airport, Air quality and Asthma (AAA) research study, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the use of air cleaners with HEPA filters can effectively reduce indoor air pollution and improve airway health for children with asthma living near a major airport. We hypothesize that the intervention will be associated with lower concentrations of indoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e, improved asthma control, and lower incidence of airway symptoms. This study is a collaboration with a county health department, leveraging an established CHW-delivered asthma education program for support on participant recruitment, community engagement, and data collection. By conducting the trial before initiation of the asthma education program, we aim to distinguish any beneficial impacts of HEPA air cleaners from those of the asthma education intervention, a challenge in prior similar studies.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The AAA research study will also serve as an example of a community-engaged research project centered on partnership between academia and a local health department, with CHWs serving as important community liaisons.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"METHODS","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrial design and study overview\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe design is a parallel group, two-arm randomized superiority trial. In brief, participating households are block randomized to either an intervention group or a lower quality filter group in a 1:1 ratio overall and further balanced 1:1 within groups by household smoking status, defined as reported presence versus absence of smoking household members. At the start of the trial, an indoor air cleaner is set up in the bedroom of the participating child. The two arms of the study are distinguished by the type of filters included in the air cleaner. Air cleaners in intervention group homes are outfitted with a set of three filters (pre-filter, activated carbon filter, and HEPA filter) while those in the less effective filter group receive an air cleaner with only a pre-filter. This comparator is appropriate because very coarse particles, including pet dander and dust, will be filtered, but fine particulates, such PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e, will not; this allows us to test the potential effect of HEPA filtration specifically. Using a less effective filtration blinds participants to intervention status, mitigating possible bias in reported outcomes. All households are followed for a three-month observation period that coincides with administration of the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStudy setting\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study is set in South King County, Washington, in the communities surrounding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1). This region has a lower median income and a higher percentage of people of color than the rest of the county. Roughly three-fourths (74.8%) of the county’s Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander residents and the majority of its Black/African American (72.7%) and Hispanic/Latino (57.6%) residents live in this area.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003ehas a relatively high exposure to road and air traffic pollutants, including PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e and UFP, due to emissions associated with the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Boeing Field (a smaller regional airport), and a high density of busy roadways and highways. In 2022, the asthma hospitalization rate for children in this region was 57% higher than for the rest of the county (59.9 vs. 38.0 per 100,000); for adults, the rate was 80% higher (26.2 vs. 14.6 per 100,000).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCollaborations with local health department and community-based organizations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe AAA research study is a collaboration between the University of Washington and the Public Health-Seattle \u0026amp; King County Asthma Program, a CHW-administered asthma intervention program based on the “Healthy Homes” model that has supported King County families for over 20 years.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In 2024, the asthma program was awarded funds from the Washington state legislature for the Airports, Air quality, and Asthma (AAA) Initiative. This initiative funded both the AAA research study and a significant expansion of the King County CHW Asthma Program to serve high-need communities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo increase the program’s capacity and better serve these communities, the AAA Initiative recruited and funded four community-based organizations (CBOs) to train and deploy CHWs. The four CBOs, African Community Housing \u0026amp; Development, Cultivate South Park, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, and Villa Comunitaria, each had well-established CHW programs and deep connections with the diverse populations within the focus geography. The African Community Housing \u0026amp; Development empowers the community of African Diaspora immigrants, refugees, and their descendants by building culturally rooted health and housing stability through economic development, legal support, resource navigation, holistic education, and access to cultural arts and traditions. Cultivate South Park is a resident-led, asset-based community development organization identifying, connecting, and celebrating neighborhood gifts in the South Park neighborhood. Lutheran Community Services Northwest enhances health outcomes through partnerships, specialty medical and mental health access, health education, and culturally sensitive case management for their largely immigrant and refugee clients. Villa Comunitaria serves predominately Spanish-speaking families in economic development, citizenship and voter education, healthy communities, skills and leadership, and systems navigation. The CHWs in these organizations live within the target communities and share the population’s language and racial/ethnic background. They were trained and mentored on how to provide direct services by the experienced CHWs in the King County CHW Asthma Program.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe King County CHW Asthma Program and CBOs support the AAA research study in several ways. The CHWs facilitate recruitment and enrollment into the study, communicate with research participants, attend home visits at the beginning and end of the study, and provide culturally knowledgeable facilitation between participants and the research staff. This integration of the King County CHW Asthma Program and the research study is an important strength of the AAA approach because recruitment into the Asthma Program and the research study are conducted in parallel. The relationship between the CHWs and participating families is reinforced through the dual roles of the CHW, in participating on the research team and in administering the King County CHW Asthma Program intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe CHWs also received additional education and training in environmental health from the AAA research team, including interactive training sessions on environmental justice and air pollution, with a specific focus on issues affecting the study region. CHWs were also trained on research procedures, including how to protect personally identifiable information and use of REDCap for data collection.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The AAA research team collaborated with the CHWs to design a communication strategy, including low-burden and integrative methods for scheduling home visits. The CHWs also provided feedback on study materials, including surveys and other documents, providing a valuable perspective from the communities they serve.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eParticipant eligibility criteria\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eChildren with asthma and one caregiver in the same household were recruited for participation in the AAA research study. Figure\u0026nbsp;2 displays the timeline of all activities, starting from screening. Inclusion criteria were: child is 6–12 years old with health care provider-diagnosed asthma; caregiver is comfortable participating in all study activities in English, including communicating with study staff by phone and completing online surveys, and is familiar with the child’s daily asthma health; residence within 10 miles of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as determined by zip code; child resides in caregiver’s home at least five nights a week on a regular basis; and no plans to move in the next three months. Participants were excluded if the child was determined to have severe asthma at baseline, because participation in the research study requires up to a 4-month delay in initiation of the King County CHW Asthma Program. Severe asthma was defined in consultation with pediatric pulmonologists to be caregiver-reported asthma symptoms every day over the past 14 days and/or two or more inpatient hospitalizations for asthma in the past 12 months. Households were excluded if there were multiple individuals with asthma eligible for the King County CHW Asthma Program if \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eany\u003c/span\u003e of the household members had severe asthma.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecruitment, participant consent/assent, and ethics review\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEnrollment into the AAA research study began June 1, 2024, and was ongoing at the time of this report. The target enrollment is N = 60 child-caregiver pairs. Recruitment is implemented as part of the referral protocol for the King County CHW Asthma Program (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3). Potential new Asthma Program clients are self-referred, referred by a health care provider, or referred by a caretaker. Each new referral is assigned to a CHW, who calls the client or a caregiver within three business days. If the individual with asthma being referred is a child 6–12 years old and lives within the focus geography, the CHW asks the caregiver permission to screen for eligibility for the AAA research study. Those who are not interested in the research opportunity or who are determined to be ineligible proceed directly to enrollment in the King County CHW Asthma Program, conducted by an AAA study coordinator. Caregivers who expressed interest in enrolling are asked by the coordinator to review and sign an online consent form and to support the enrolled child in an assent process, which includes a video describing the study. The CHW then schedules a baseline home visit for the AAA research study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e All research protocols, including the consent and assent procedures and materials, were reviewed and approved by the UW Institutional Review Board and the Research Administration and Review Committee of Public Health-Seattle King County. Confidentiality of identifiers is ensured by use of a HIPAA compliant data collection platform (REDCap). Participants are offered monetary incentives for participation, distributed after the first home visit and after the second home visit, and they are allowed to keep the air cleaner and a HEPA filter replacement kit at the end of the research study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eParticipant safety monitoring\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eParticipant safety monitoring includes weekly review of caregiver reports of child airway symptoms (see below). Children who have 2 or more weeks of daily symptoms may experience uncontrolled, severe asthma. When this occurs, the caregiver is contacted to confirm the responses and discuss the child’s current asthma health. Researchers then present the individual case to the pediatrician consulting with the asthma education program to determine whether the child can continue participating in the research protocol.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrial timeline\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFigure 4 shows the timeline of research activities for each participant. Following recruitment into the AAA research study and allocation to treatment groups, pre-intervention (i.e., baseline) data collection of effectiveness outcomes is conducted through surveys and indoor air monitoring. A three-month observation period begins after initiation of the intervention and includes longitudinal data collection (continued indoor air monitoring and caregiver surveys on child asthma symptoms). At the end of the observation period, the baseline assessment of child asthma control is repeated. All families are offered the opportunity to enroll in the King County CHW Asthma Program after the AAA research study ends.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAllocation procedures\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter enrollment, each child is randomized to the intervention or less effective filter \u0026nbsp;group using the REDCap Randomization Module by a study coordinator. Participants are block-randomized based on household smoking status, to ensure an approximately equal ratio of smoking and nonsmoking households in the two groups. Smoking is a very strong determinant of indoor air quality as well as child airway health, and balancing groups by smoking can reduce the influence of residual confounding in the case that randomization does not achieve balance between the groups. We chose not to exclude households with smokers because that would reduce the generalizability of study findings. When two children in one household were enrolled in the research study, both were randomized to the same group. Participants and CHWs are blinded to intervention status. The research team, including those who attend the home visit or manage and analyze data, are not blinded. Protocols for unblinding in the course of the trial were deemed unnecessary and not established.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBaseline data collection (pre-intervention)\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePre-intervention data collection included surveys and indoor air monitoring, to describe the study population and estimate baseline levels of intervention outcomes. \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBaseline surveys\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCaregivers complete an online baseline survey after enrollment. Survey topics include family sociodemographics, health behaviors, child airway health history, access to health care, asthma medication use, and features of the indoor environment. Baseline surveys include the Child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), which the caregiver completes in collaboration with the child.\u003csup\u003e56\u0026ndash;58\u003c/sup\u003e The C-ACT is a short seven-question survey used to characterize child asthma control based on parent and child report of symptoms over the prior 30 days. The C-ACT has been validated for ages 4-11 years old and shown to have good psychometric properties.\u003csup\u003e56\u0026ndash;58\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026nbsp; A C-ACT score is calculated based on responses, ranging from 0 to 27, with higher values reflecting better asthma control, and a score of 19 or lower considered to reflect inadequate, or \u0026ldquo;poor,\u0026rdquo; control.\u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e Study team staff review responses on the baseline survey to address missing data or participant confusion during the study visits.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eBaseline home visit\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAAA research study team members and the CHW assigned to the family conduct a home visit after enrollment. Attendance of the caregiver but not the child is required. At the start of the visit, the CHW introduces the research study team staff to the participants and requests permission to enter the home, including the child’s bedroom. The visit protocol includes an overview of study activities and discussion of participant’s questions or concerns, if any; set-up of the air cleaner, air monitor, and energy data logger in the child’s bedroom (details below); completion of the baseline survey and/or review of any questions that require additional clarification, if necessary; and demonstration of the weekly asthma symptom surveys, with completion of the first weekly survey. A brief inspection of the child’s bedroom includes measurement of its dimensions, description of carpet and fabric-covered items in the bedroom, and documentation of any existing air cleaner in the room.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile the AAA research study team is setting up equipment, the CHW engages with the caregiver (and child, if present). Topics may include the family’s experience with asthma and asthma symptoms, future opportunities for individualized asthma education and management, and relevant services and programs offered by the CHW’s community-based organization (e.g., housing services and food security programs).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIntervention: Air cleaner installation and operation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring the baseline home visit, a Winix 9800 air cleaner is installed in the child’s bedroom. The Winix 9800 is a true HEPA air cleaner that has been Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Verifide® for rooms that are 500 square feet in size. The air cleaner has a washable fine mesh pre-filter that captures large airborne particles, an activated carbon filter that reduces volatile organic compounds and odors, and a true HEPA filter that captures 99.99% of airborne allergens as small as 0.003 microns in size. Households randomized to the intervention group (arm 1) receive an air cleaner with a pre-filter, carbon filter, and HEPA air filter pre-installed while those in the less effective filter group (arm 2) receive an air cleaner with only the pre-filter. Each air cleaner is connected to an Onset® HOBO® UX120-018 plug load data logger which measures and records the power and energy consumption of the air cleaner (energy logger), which will be employed to assess use of the air filter.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWith input from the caregiver, the field team places the air cleaner in the child’s bedroom. Air cleaner placement is mainly based on the location and availability of a power outlet. If possible, the air cleaner and PurpleAir air monitor (described below) are placed on opposite sides of the bedroom to ensure sampling from well-mixed room air. The caregiver is instructed in the handling and operation of the air cleaner, encouraged to keep the fan on during the full 3-month study period, and told that typical fan speeds at night are \u003cem\u003elow\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003emedium\u003c/em\u003e fan speed. When the air cleaner is first turned on, the default setting is automatic mode, in which the air cleaner will automatically increase fan speed based on an internal particle counter. The caregiver is also instructed not to move or open the air cleaner, not to disconnect the data logger, and that there is no need to change any of the filters during the study period.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe caregiver is asked to keep the air cleaner off for a week after the baseline home visit for the collection of pre-intervention air pollution concentrations. A sticker is placed on the air cleaner as a reminder of the date, and the CHW also contacts the caregiver on that date to confirm the air cleaner is turned on.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe employ several strategies to improve adherence to the intervention protocols. Protocols are discussed with the study team, including the trusted CHW, in person at the baseline home visit, with demonstration of the equipment and with opportunities for the participant to ask questions. As described below, caregivers complete weekly surveys, which include questions about air cleaner use. In this way, they are reminded of the protocol and prompted to continue using the cleaner and, they also have a convenient opportunity to report problems with the devices if they have any. Adherence is monitored using the energy loggers as well as through weekly surveys, on which caregivers report frequency of use over the prior seven days.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e Participants were not asked to restrict engagement in any other interventions or health care for their child during the trial.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLongitudinal data collection (observation period): Indoor air monitoring and weekly symptom surveys\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA three-month observation period begins the day that the caregiver confirms initiation of air cleaner operation. During this period, the caregivers are encouraged to use the air cleaner continuously. Longitudinal measures of indoor air quality and child airway health are collected throughout this period.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndoor air monitoring of PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e is conducted with a PurpleAir Zen air quality monitor, installed in the child’s bedroom during the first home visit, affixed to the wall or atop a shelf, depending on the availability of space. The monitor collects PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e, ambient temperature and relative humidity at 5-minute intervals, stored on the device (via microSD card) and downloaded after the monitor is retrieved at the end-of-study home visit. Data will be uploaded to study drives, grouped by daily measurement clusters. Completeness of the raw data will be assessed (e.g., percentage of expected data points), and quality assurance protocols will be applied. These protocols include removal of values with low within-room correlation (r \u0026lt; 0.7), exclusion of days with zero variation in measurements, and attenuation of extreme values through Winsorizing within each participant monitoring period.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLongitudinal child airway health is characterized through brief online surveys sent to caregivers on a weekly basis. Caregivers report the number of days in the prior week on which the child was coughing, wheezing, had shortness of breath, was awakened at night due to asthma and used asthma quick relief medication (e.g., albuterol inhaler).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e They are asked whether the child had an unscheduled clinic visit, an emergency room visit, or hospitalization due to asthma in the past seven days. Caregivers are also asked to report the number of nights of the past week the child spent at home and whether the child had a respiratory infection. Weekly surveys ask caregivers about whether the family experienced any issues with the indoor air cleaner and how frequently they used it in the past week.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRetention and protocol for attrition or intervention deviation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used several methods to maximize retention and data completion, including integration of the Asthma Program CHW in the baseline home visit and participant communications, weekly surveys for data collection as well as outreach, and timely follow up in the case of missing data. In the case of participant drop-out or deviation from the intervention protocol (i.e., limited use of air cleaner), we will retain all outcome data and conduct sensitivity analyses with exclusion of participants or specific periods, as appropriate.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnd of study data collection (post-intervention): Second home visit\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAfter the observation period ends, a second home visit is scheduled. At this visit, the research team collects the air quality monitor and the energy logger. The HEPA air cleaner is also inspected and the pre-filter is cleaned by a handheld HEPA vacuum cleaner. A new black carbon is installed in air cleaners of intervention families; HEPA and carbon filters are installed in air cleaners of families in the less effective arm. All families are also provided with a new replacement filter kit and extra activated black carbon filters. The research team provides instructions for future air cleaner use and maintenance and asks about the family’s overall experience in the study and ease of use of the air cleaner.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePrimary and secondary intervention outcomes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe effectiveness of the intervention to reduce indoor air pollution and improve the health of children with asthma is assessed through several primary and secondary outcomes. Primary outcomes related to air quality include the average indoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e in the child’s bedroom as well as the ratio of indoor to outdoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e, both averaged across the three-month intervention period. Outdoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e will be estimated from regional regulatory air monitors and PurpleAir sensor data, as available. Primary health outcomes include the change in child ACT score between baseline and post-intervention as well as the total count of symptom-days in the observation period, with “symptom-day” defined as a day on which any asthma symptom or medication use was reported. Several secondary health outcomes will be analyzed in exploratory analyses, including: count of unscheduled clinic visits, ER visits and hospitalizations for asthma during the observation period; count of symptom-days, broken down by different type of symptom (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath) and count of asthma medication use days; and count of respiratory infections in the observation period.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eData analysis plan and power calculations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDescriptive analyses will be conducted to describe study population characteristics, concentration of indoor air pollutants (baseline and observation period), and child asthma health outcomes. Distributions of each variable will be summarized overall and stratified by intervention, with continuous variables presented as means, medians, standard deviations and interquartile ranges and categorical variable summarized as counts and percentages within each category. In order to evaluate completeness of randomization between the intervention and less effective groups, t-test and chi-squared tests will be conducted to determine whether there is a significant difference in characteristics between groups.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll analyses of intervention effectiveness will be conducted with an intent-to-treat approach. The effect of the intervention on indoor air quality will be estimated through multivariate regression with robust standard errors, with average calibrated pollutant concentration as the dependent variable and group status (intervention or less effective arm) as the independent variable. Regression models will include adjustment for baseline pollutant concentration, measured in the seven days prior to intervention initiation, outdoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e concentrations, season and any predictors of indoor air quality that are not balanced between the intervention and less effective groups. Sensitivity analyses will include repeating all analyses with exclusion of participants with relatively low compliance rates of indoor air cleaner usage, determined by self-report (weekly surveys) and energy monitor data.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe effect on count of symptom-days across the intervention period will be assessed using Poisson regression with robust standard errors, with count of symptom-days during the intervention period as the dependent variable and group status as the dependent variable.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The regression model will be adjusted for season and for participant or home characteristics that are risk factors for asthma symptoms or exacerbations and not balanced between groups. Secondary health outcomes (count of unscheduled clinic visits, ER visits and hospitalizations for asthma during the observation period; count of symptom-days, broken down by different type of symptom (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath) and count of asthma medication use days, will be analyzed using the same approach, in separate models. The time at risk of event (i.e., symptom-days) will be estimated for each participant using the number of completed weekly surveys. In sensitivity analyses, weeks in which the child spent three or more days away from home will be excluded.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe target enrollment is N = 60 children (N = 30 per arm). For all power calculation, we assumed that significant confounders of this relationship are balanced between groups by randomization or addressed by adjustment. We estimated the power to detect an effect on the primary outcome related to indoor air quality, reduction in indoor PM2.5, using a simple two-sample t-test comparing the less effective and intervention groups on the within-subject differences between baseline and post-intervention indoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e. Based on prior literature,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we estimate that the intervention effect on PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e will range from 35–60% with a coefficient of variation (CV) from 60–80%. Power was calculated for these ranges of effect size and CV in a sample size of 30 homes per arm, demonstrating sufficient power (greater than 0.80) for all scenarios. We similarly estimated the power to detect an effect on two primary outcomes related to child airway health. We estimated that a sample size of N = 60 would have power of 0.81 to detect a 2-point difference in the C-ACT associated with the intervention. We also estimated power to detect a reduction in the count of symptom-days. Assuming a Poisson distribution, a percentage of symptom days in the less effective group of 15%, a sample size of N = 60 provides power of at least 0.80 to detect an effect size of 18% or higher.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAudits and approach to protocol amendments\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTrial conduct is reviewed and discussed by staff on a biweekly basis, independent of the sponsor. Important changes to the protocol will be discussed at these team meetings and submitted to IRBs for review as necessary. Changes that impact participants will be communicated to them \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e assigned CHW. Updates to the trial registry will be made as needed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDissemination of results and data sharing\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTrial findings will be communicated to the sponsor in a final report. We will also return results to the community organizations in meetings and/or in written reports, based on their preferences. Findings will also be presented in publications submitted to peer-reviewed journals.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeidentified data are available upon request, pending completion and approval of a data sharing agreement with Public Health Seattle King County. The full protocol and all statistical code will also be available upon request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo the best of our knowledge, the AAA research study is the first intervention trial evaluating the effectiveness of indoor HEPA air cleaners to improve indoor air quality and airway health for children with asthma residing in air traffic-impacted communities. The study is set in a region with relatively high exposures to traffic- and airport-related air pollution, pediatric asthma prevalence and hospitalization rates for asthma-related conditions, and socioeconomic disadvantage. Several strengths of the study increase the chances that findings can be translated to effective, feasible and sustainable asthma interventions in the future, with the ultimate objective of reducing child health inequities that result from disproportionate exposures to outdoor and indoor air pollution. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR64\" citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA notable aspect of the study design is close collaboration with the local health department and a CHW-delivered asthma program. The proposal for this research study was developed in partnership with leadership of the King County CHW Asthma Program, and all study procedures were drafted and evaluated with feedback from the CHWs who are serving the target community. Administrative staff are the first point of contact for potential research participants as they are referred to the King County Asthma Program, introducing the research opportunity to caregivers of children who are age-eligible and conducting an eligibility assessment. A CHW is then assigned to the participant and becomes their main point of contact. Recruitment has been successful to date, likely reflecting the close relationships that CHWs and participating community-based organizations can form with community members.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR67\" citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e CHWs have also been integral in AAA community outreach activities, raising awareness of both the King County CHW Asthma Program and the AAA research study through a variety of mechanisms, including in-person events and social media engagement. The CHW attends AAA study home visits along with research study staff, and the same CHW initiates the King County CHW Asthma Program seamlessly after the completion of the research study whenever possible. When the entire study is finished, CHWs will participate in efforts to disseminate findings to the community. Other community-engaged research studies have successfully leveraged relationships between CHWs and other trusted advocates and the study community in similar ways.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere are several methodological strengths of the AAA study. A randomized controlled trial design, relatively rare in the field of environmental health, minimizes the influence of potential confounders on estimates of intervention effect. We blinded participants to intervention status by installing air cleaners with “less effective” filtration for participants not randomized to the intervention, which reduces the potential of bias in reported outcomes. Most other intervention studies of indoor air filtration in schools or homes of children with asthma did not use this approach.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR39 CR40 CR41 CR42 CR43\" citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e–\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Another strength is use of energy monitors to collect objective data on use of portable air cleaners, which allows descriptive characterizations of patterns in adherence to air cleaner use, an important factor in the effectiveness of air cleaners in reducing pediatric asthma morbidity, as well as sensitivity “per protocol” analyses, accounting for the frequency of air cleaner use. Few studies of portable air cleaners and respiratory health have utilized energy monitors, a notable limitation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile the AAA study is conducted in series with a CHW-delivered asthma program, the trial was designed to evaluate the effect of portable air cleaners independent of the expected beneficial effects of the asthma program. Therefore, we conducted the trial prior to initiation of the asthma program rather than concurrently, in contrast to other studies which were challenged to distinguish beneficial effects of the intervention from that of the asthma education program.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The AAA study assesses multiple asthma health outcomes, including longitudinal reports of asthma symptoms and medication usage on a relatively short time scale (weekly), providing a detailed characterization of time-varying asthma health. This is important because the respiratory health of children with asthma can vary substantially from week to week, and factors such as viral infections, stress, or changes in activity can greatly influence asthma health and reduce statistical power in studies relying on a small number of respiratory health assessments (e.g., baseline and post-intervention). Repeated measurement of asthma health will provide characterization of within- and between-participant variability in health and, further, support analyses of time-varying air pollution exposure, as measured by indoor air monitors, and short-term associations with asthma symptoms and medication use.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe AAA research study also faces challenges and limitations. Trial recruitment is conducted in the context of referrals into the King County CHW Asthma Program. The capacity of this program has been limited in recent years due to a shift from providing services to training and dissemination as well as impacts of the COVID pandemic. After receiving funding to expand services and the support of the contracted community-based organizations, the program had to re-initiate referral networks and outreach efforts. These factors limited the pace of trial recruitment. Despite this challenge, the integration of trial protocols into the Asthma Program is a major strength, as described above. Another potential limitation is the possibility of missing data in repeated weekly surveys for caregivers during the three-month intervention period. Surveys were designed to be low burden for participants (short and easily accessible), and staff demonstrated the surveys to caregivers at the time of the first home visit, to increase participant familiarity with longitudinal data collection. Other limitations include the exclusion of children with severe asthma, which limits generalizability of study findings; however, exclusion was necessary in order to avoid delaying health care for children most at risk of serious exacerbations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eAAA = Airport, Air quality, and Asthma\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCHW = community health worker\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCBO = community-based organization\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eC-ACT = child asthma control test\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eER = emergency room\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHEPA = high efficiency particulate air\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePM = particulate matter\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e = particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eREDCap = Research Electronic Data Capture\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTRAP = traffic-related air pollution\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUFP = ultrafine particulate matter\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUW = University of Washington\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFUNDING STATEMENT\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was funded by the Washington State Department of Health. The funder \u003cstrong\u003edid not have a role\u003c/strong\u003e in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication. The funder did not review or endorse any element of the study.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTRIAL STATUS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025). Recruitment began June 1, 2024, and the estimated end of recruitment will be April 2026.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe AAA study was reviewed by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board on (arch 7, 2024 (STUDY00019144) and by Public Health-Seattle King County Institutional Review Board on April 8, 2024 (RARC #24-751). Written, informed consent to participate is collected from all participants before enrollment. Participating children provide assent with support of a parent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe current paper describes a trial protocol only and as such does not include pilot data. This manuscript does not contain individual personal data from patients. A model consent form is available upon request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDe-identified information on indoor and outdoor air quality over the course of the study period will be shared through an open-source publication. De-identified weekly symptom questionnaire will be shared, however identifiable participant information including age, gender/sex and home address will be redacted. A data management plan is available through dmptool.org, allowing researchers to identify and request data elements that are not available through open-source mechanisms. Access to the full identified dataset will be maintained by Dr. Austin, and requests to provide de-identified components beyond what is publicly available will be through direct request.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eFunding\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFunding was provided through a grant from the Washington State Department of Health. Additional funding for exposure characterization was provided through the University of Washington (UW) Interdisciplinary Center for Exposures, Diseases, Genomics, and Environment (EDGE) of the National Institutes of Health (P30ES007033). Funders had no authority over trial conduct.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEA is the lead investigator. She led the proposal and attained funding in partnership with JC. She led protocol development, supervised student and staff activities, and led development of IRB protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCL was the lead epidemiologist. She led manuscript preparation and contributed to study design as well as development of the proposal.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJS was the lead project coordinator and co-lead field team member on the University of Washington (UW) team. He also contributed to the manuscript preparation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMTF was a project coordinator and co-lead field team member on the UW team. She coordinated IRB submission and contributed to the manuscript preparation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePL was a UW field team member and contributed to the manuscript preparation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJC contributed to the development of the proposal and study protocol. She oversaw participating CHWs and study recruitment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe gratefully acknowledge the support of Giaan Nguyen for coordination and communication with families and CHWs, and the community-based organizations, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, African Community Housing \u0026amp; Development, Cultivate South Park and Villa Comunitaria, who participated in the AAA initiative. We also thank the research participants and their families for their contributions to our study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePate CA, Zahran HS. The Status of Asthma in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jul 18;21:240005. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWendt JK, Symanski E, Du XL. Estimation of Asthma Incidence Among Low-Income Children in Texas: A Novel Approach Using Medicaid Claims Data. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2012 Oct 15;176(8):744\u0026ndash;50. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerry R, Braileanu G, Palmer T, Stevens P. The Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in the United States: Literature Review of Current Evidence. PharmacoEconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):155\u0026ndash;67. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSullivan PW, Ghushchyan V, Kavati A, Navaratnam P, Friedman HS, Ortiz B. Health Disparities Among Children with Asthma in the United States by Place of Residence. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2019 Jan;7(1):148\u0026ndash;55. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEsposito S, Tenconi R, Lelii M, Preti V, Nazzari E, Consolo S, et al. Possible molecular mechanisms linking air pollution and asthma in children. BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Dec;14(1):31. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJerrett M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, K\u0026uuml;nzli N, Avol E, et al. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Asthma Onset in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study with Individual Exposure Measurement. Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Oct;116(10):1433\u0026ndash;8. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhreis H, Kelly C, Tate J, Parslow R, Lucas K, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International. 2017 Mar;100:1\u0026ndash;31. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHauptman M, Gaffin JM, Petty CR, Sheehan WJ, Lai PS, Coull B, et al. Proximity to major roadways and asthma symptoms in the School Inner-City Asthma Study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020 Jan;145(1):119-126.e4. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLenssen ES, Janssen NAH, Oldenwening M, Meliefste K, De Jonge D, Kamstra RJM, et al. Beyond the Runway: Respiratory health effects of ultrafine particles from aviation in children. Environment International. 2024 Jun;188:108759. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGauderman WJ, Avol E, Lurmann F, Kuenzli N, Gilliland F, Peters J, et al. Childhood Asthma and Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide: Epidemiology. 2005 Nov;16(6):737\u0026ndash;43. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHealth Effects Institute. Health Effects Institute. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. HEI Special Report 17. Boston: Health Effects Institute; 2010. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhreis H, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Childhood Asthma: Recent Advances and Remaining Gaps in the Exposure Assessment Methods. IJERPH. 2017 Mar 17;14(3):312. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShao J, Wheeler AJ, Zosky GR, Johnston FH. Long-term impacts of prenatal and infant exposure to fine particulate matter on wheezing and asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Epidemiology. 2019 Apr;3(2):e042. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlotaibi R, Bechle M, Marshall JD, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Traffic related air pollution and the burden of childhood asthma in the contiguous United States in 2000 and 2010. Environment International. 2019 Jun;127:858\u0026ndash;67. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBlanco MN, Gassett A, Gould T, Doubleday A, Slager DL, Austin E, et al. Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign. Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Aug 16;56(16):11460\u0026ndash;72. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvans KA, Halterman JS, Hopke PK, Fagnano M, Rich DQ. Increased ultrafine particles and carbon monoxide concentrations are associated with asthma exacerbation among urban children. Environmental Research. 2014 Feb;129:11\u0026ndash;9. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNazaroff WW, Goldstein AH. Indoor chemistry: research opportunities and challenges. Indoor Air. 2015 Aug;25(4):357\u0026ndash;61. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKlepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2001 Jul 1;11(3):231\u0026ndash;52. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFawzy A, Woo H, Raju S, Belz DC, Putcha N, Williams MS, et al. Indoor particulate matter concentrations and air cleaner intervention association with biomarkers in former smokers with COPD. Environmental Research. 2024 Feb;243:117874. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEom SY, Kim A, Lee JH, Kim SM, Lee SY, Hwang KK, et al. Positive Effect of Air Purifier Intervention on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Crossover Intervention Trial. IJERPH. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7078. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnkhbat U, Gombojav E, Banzrai C, Batsukh S, Boldbaatar B, Enkhtuya E, et al. Portable HEPA filter air cleaner use during pregnancy and children\u0026rsquo;s autistic behaviors at four years of age: The UGAAR randomized controlled trial. Environment International. 2022 Oct;168:107432. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu S, Chen J, Zhao Q, Song X, Shao D, Meliefste K, et al. Cardiovascular benefits of short-term indoor air filtration intervention in elderly living in Beijing: An extended analysis of BIAPSY study. Environmental Research. 2018 Nov;167:632\u0026ndash;8. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarkjohn KK, Norris C, Cui X, Fang L, Zheng T, Schauer JJ, et al. Real‐time measurements of PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e and ozone to assess the effectiveness of residential indoor air filtration in Shanghai homes. Indoor Air. 2021 Jan;31(1):74\u0026ndash;87. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdamkiewicz G, Zota AR, Fabian MP, Chahine T, Julien R, Spengler JD, et al. Moving Environmental Justice Indoors: Understanding Structural Influences on Residential Exposure Patterns in Low-Income Communities. Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(S1):S238\u0026ndash;45. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePostma J, Karr C, Kieckhefer G. Community Health Workers and Environmental Interventions for Children with Asthma: A Systematic Review. Journal of Asthma. 2009 Jan;46(6):564\u0026ndash;76. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmerican Public Health Association. Community Health Workers [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.apha.org/apha-communities/member-sections/community-health-workers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElkugia N, Crocker ME, Stout JW, Bolt K, Weiner BJ, Kramer CB. Development of an Asthma Home-Visit Training Program for Community Health Workers and Their Supervisors in Washington State. Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;9:674843. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParker EA, Israel BA, Robins TG, Mentz G, Xihong Lin, Brakefield-Caldwell W, et al. Evaluation of Community Action Against Asthma: A Community Health Worker Intervention to Improve Children\u0026rsquo;s Asthma-Related Health by Reducing Household Environmental Triggers for Asthma. Health Educ Behav. 2008 Jun;35(3):376\u0026ndash;95. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell JD, Brooks M, Hosokawa P, Robinson J, Song L, Krieger J. Community Health Worker Home Visits for Medicaid-Enrolled Children With Asthma: Effects on Asthma Outcomes and Costs. Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2366\u0026ndash;72. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKrieger JW, Takaro TK, Song L, Weaver M. The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Intervention to Decrease Exposure to Indoor Asthma Triggers. Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):652\u0026ndash;9. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJonas JA, Leu CS, Reznik M. A randomized controlled trial of a community health worker delivered home-based asthma intervention to improve pediatric asthma outcomes. Journal of Asthma. 2022 Feb 1;59(2):395\u0026ndash;406. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFox P, Porter PG, Lob SH, Boer JH, Rocha DA, Adelson JW. Improving Asthma-Related Health Outcomes Among Low-Income, Multiethnic, School-aged Children: Results of a Demonstration Project That Combined Continuous Quality Improvement and Community Health Worker Strategies. Pediatrics. 2007 Oct 1;120(4):e902\u0026ndash;11. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee GH, Kim JH, Kim S, Lee S, Lim DH. Effects of Indoor Air Purifiers on Children with Asthma. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(4):310. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaung TZ, Bishop JE, Holt E, Turner AM, Pfrang C. Indoor Air Pollution and the Health of Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter (PM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Their Effects on Children and People with Pre-Existing Lung Disease. IJERPH. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8752. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKelly FJ, Fussell JC. Improving indoor air quality, health and performance within environments where people live, travel, learn and work. Atmospheric Environment. 2019 Mar;200:90\u0026ndash;109. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu Y, Raja S, Ferro AR, Jaques PA, Hopke PK, Gressani C, et al. Effectiveness of heating, ventilation and air conditioning system with HEPA filter unit on indoor air quality and asthmatic children\u0026rsquo;s health. Building and Environment. 2010 Feb;45(2):330\u0026ndash;7. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarmona N, Seto E, Gould TR, Rasyid E, Shirai JH, Cummings B, et al. Indoor Air Quality Intervention in Schools: Effectiveness of a Portable HEPA Filter Deployment in Five Schools Impacted by Roadway and Aircraft Pollution Sources. Atmosphere. 2022 Oct 5;13(10):1623. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eButz AM, Matsui EC, Breysse P, Curtin-Brosnan J, Eggleston PA, Diette G, et al. A Randomized Trial of Air Cleaners and a Health Coach to Improve Indoor Air Quality for Inner-City Children With Asthma and Secondhand Smoke Exposure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug 1;165(8):741. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEggleston PA, Butz A, Rand C, Curtin-Brosnan J, Kanchanaraksa S, Swartz L, et al. Home environmental intervention in inner-city asthma: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Annals of Allergy, Asthma \u0026amp; Immunology. 2005 Dec;95(6):518\u0026ndash;24. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJhun I, Gaffin JM, Coull BA, Huffaker MF, Petty CR, Sheehan WJ, et al. School Environmental Intervention to Reduce Particulate Pollutant Exposures for Children with Asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2017 Jan;5(1):154-159.e3. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLanphear BP, Hornung RW, Khoury J, Yolton K, Lierl M, Kalkbrenner A. Effects of HEPA Air Cleaners on Unscheduled Asthma Visits and Asthma Symptoms for Children Exposed to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke. Pediatrics. 2011 Jan 1;127(1):93\u0026ndash;101. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMorgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, O\u0026rsquo;Connor GT, Kattan M, Evans R, et al. Results of a Home-Based Environmental Intervention among Urban Children with Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1068\u0026ndash;80. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNoonan CW, Semmens EO, Smith P, Harrar SW, Montrose L, Weiler E, et al. Randomized Trial of Interventions to Improve Childhood Asthma in Homes with Wood-burning Stoves. Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 22;125(9):097010. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDrieling RL, Sampson PD, Krenz JE, Tchong French MI, Jansen KL, Massey AE, et al. Randomized trial of a portable HEPA air cleaner intervention to reduce asthma morbidity among Latino children in an agricultural community. Environ Health. 2022 Dec;21(1):1. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCheek E, Guercio V, Shrubsole C, Dimitroulopoulou S. Portable air purification: Review of impacts on indoor air quality and health. Science of The Total Environment. 2021 Apr;766:142585. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEbrahimifakhar A, Poursadegh M, Hu Y, Yuill DP, Luo Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis of field studies of portable air cleaners: Performance, user behavior, and by-product emissions. Science of The Total Environment. 2024 Feb;912:168786. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobertson NM, Qiu A, Raju S, McCormack MC, Koehler K. Cleaning indoor air\u0026mdash;what works for respiratory health: An updated literature review and recommendations. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2024 Oct;154(4):847\u0026ndash;60. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdibi A, Barn P, Shellington EM, Harvard S, Johnson KM, Carlsten C. High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters for Preventing Wildfire-related Asthma Complications: A Cost-Effectiveness Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 15;209(2):175\u0026ndash;84. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCox J, Isiugo K, Ryan P, Grinshpun SA, Yermakov M, Desmond C, et al. Effectiveness of a portable air cleaner in removing aerosol particles in homes close to highways. Indoor Air. 2018 Nov;28(6):818\u0026ndash;27. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBatterman S, Du L, Mentz G, Mukherjee B, Parker E, Godwin C, et al. Particulate matter concentrations in residences: an intervention study evaluating stand-alone filters and air conditioners: Air filters and air conditioners in homes. Indoor Air. 2012 Jun;22(3):235\u0026ndash;52. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohnson K, Solet D, Serry K. Community Health and Airport Operations Related Noise and Air Pollution: Report to the Legislature in Response to Washington State HOUSE BILL 1109. Public Health Seattle \u0026amp; King County; Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation Unit; 2020 Dec. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWashington State Office of Financial Management. Population estimates [Internet]. Washington State Office of Financial Management. [cited 2025 Feb 19]. Available from: https://ofm.wa.gov/washington-data-research/population-demographics/population-estimates\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWashington State Department of Health. Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) [Internet]. Washington State Department of Health. [cited 2025 Feb 19]. Available from: https://doh.wa.gov/data-statistical-reports/healthcare-washington/hospital-and-patient-data/hospital-discharge-data-chars\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)\u0026mdash;A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009 Apr;42(2):377\u0026ndash;81. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O\u0026rsquo;Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019 Jul;95:103208. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBime C, Gerald JK, Wei CY, Holbrook JT, Teague WG, Wise RA, et al. Measurement characteristics of the childhood Asthma-Control Test and a shortened, child-only version. npj Prim Care Resp Med. 2016 Oct 20;26(1):16075. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, et al. Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007 Apr;119(4):817\u0026ndash;25. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChu F, Kappel N, Akel M, Press VG, Alexander JT, Volerman A. Validity of the Childhood Asthma Control Test in diverse populations: A systematic review. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2023 May;58(5):1322\u0026ndash;36. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBryant-Stephens T, Kurian C, Guo R, Zhao H. Impact of a Household Environmental Intervention Delivered by Lay Health Workers on Asthma Symptom Control in Urban, Disadvantaged Children With Asthma. Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(S3):S657\u0026ndash;65. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJanevic MR, Stoll S, Wilkin M, Song PXK, Baptist A, Lara M, et al. Pediatric Asthma Care Coordination in Underserved Communities: A Quasiexperimental Study. Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):2012\u0026ndash;8. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRiederer AM, Krenz JE, Tchong‐French MI, Torres E, Perez A, Younglove LR, et al. Effectiveness of portable HEPA air cleaners on reducing indoor PM\u003csub\u003e2.5\u003c/sub\u003e and NH\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e in an agricultural cohort of children with asthma: A randomized intervention trial. Indoor Air. 2021 Mar;31(2):454\u0026ndash;66. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePavilonis BT, Anthony TR, O\u0026rsquo;Shaughnessy PT, Humann MJ, Merchant JA, Moore G, et al. Indoor and outdoor particulate matter and endotoxin concentrations in an intensely agricultural county. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013 May;23(3):299\u0026ndash;305. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBronte-Moreno O, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Barcala FJ, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz-Gall X, Pueyo-Bastida A, Ramos-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez J, Urrutia-Landa I. Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma: A Scoping Review. Open Respiratory Archives. 2023 Apr;5(2):100229. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBryant-Stephens TC, Strane D, Robinson EK, Bhambhani S, Kenyon CC. Housing and asthma disparities. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021 Nov;148(5):1121\u0026ndash;9. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolden KA, Lee AR, Hawcutt DB, Sinha IP. The impact of poor housing and indoor air quality on respiratory health in children. Breathe. 2023 Jun;19(2):230058. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePappalardo AA, Martin MA, Weinstein S, Pugach O, Mosnaim GS. Improving Adherence in Urban Youth With Asthma: Role of Community Health Workers. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2022 Dec;10(12):3186\u0026ndash;93. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMartin MA, Pugach O, Mosnaim G, Weinstein S, Rosales G, Roy A, et al. Community Health Worker Asthma Interventions for Children: Results From a Clinically Integrated Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (2016‒2019). Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1328\u0026ndash;37. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCoutinho MT, Subzwari SS, McQuaid EL, Koinis-Mitchell D. Community Health Workers\u0026rsquo; Role in Supporting Pediatric Asthma Management: A Review. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology. 2020 Jun;8(2):195\u0026ndash;210. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverhart RS, Mazzeo SE, Corona R, Holder RL, Thacker LR, Schechter MS. A community-based asthma program: Study design and methods of RVA Breathes. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2020 Oct;97:106121. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMasterson EE, Younglove LB, Perez A, Torres E, Krenz JE, Tchong French MI, et al. The home air in agriculture pediatric intervention (HAPI) trial: Rationale and methods. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106085. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"trials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"trls","sideBox":"Learn more about [Trials](http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13063","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/trls","title":"Trials","twitterHandle":"MedicalEvidence","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Asthma, community health workers, indoor air intervention, outdoor air pollution","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBACKGROUND: For children with asthma, exposure to indoor air pollution increases the risk of a serious asthma exacerbation, which can be life-threatening. Interventions aimed at improving indoor air quality, including use of a portable air cleaner with a high-efficiency particle air (HEPA) filter, may reduce this risk; however, the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of HEPA air cleaners varies, and more research in various settings is needed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMETHODS: In collaboration with a community health worker (CHW) delivered asthma education program, we are conducting a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of HEPA air cleaners to improve indoor air quality and child asthma health in South King County of Washington State, a vulnerable community impacted by air pollution from airports and highway traffic. A key feature of the Airports, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) design is extensive integration of CHWs, including CHWs recruited from community-based organizations, into multiple aspects of the trial protocol. We aim to recruit up to N=60 children with asthma, randomized into intervention and less effective filtration (control) groups in a 1:1 ratio, conduct baseline assessments of indoor air quality and airway health, and collect repeated assessments of air quality and airway health during a three-month intervention period as well as after the trial concludes. Primary effectiveness outcomes are concentration of indoor air pollution during the intervention period and two measures of child airway health: change in asthma control score pre- and post-intervention and incidence of asthma symptoms during the intervention period. Several secondary outcomes related to air quality and child health will be explored as well.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first trial of indoor air filtration and pediatric asthma health in a community highly impacted by airport-related air pollution. The close collaboration with a CHW-delivered asthma program is also unique and important for future translation of results to future public health programming. Study findings will inform future approaches to integrate HEPA air cleaners into existing CHW asthma education programs in this and similar communities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTRIAL REGISTRATION: The AAA research study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT07047430; registration approved July 1, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-22 09:54:51","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7181465/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2025-09-11T15:31:19+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-09-11T14:53:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-09-04T13:33:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Trials","date":"2025-09-03T17:38:55+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"decision","content":"Minor revision","date":"2025-08-20T04:08:59+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"trials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"trls","sideBox":"Learn more about [Trials](http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13063","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/trls","title":"Trials","twitterHandle":"MedicalEvidence","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"e9811158-4afb-4d67-811a-4683495f3e9b","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 22nd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-01T16:06:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7181465","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09286-8","journal":{"identity":"trials","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Trials"},"publishedOn":"2025-11-27 15:57:52","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 27th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-22 09:54:51","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09286-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09286-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7181465","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7181465","identity":"rs-7181465","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}