Subliminal risk influences subjective value in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,040 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The relationship between conscious awareness and decisions has been heavily debated. Here we investigated whether subliminal probabilities are integrated with conscious rewards to form subjective value (SV) representations in the anterior ventral striatum (aVS) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Participants played an incentivized competitive game with risky choice to accumulate points across trials in a behavioral and fMRI experiment. The game was a modified attentional-blink paradigm that rendered a probability cue unseen (indicating a 100% or 0% chance to win a risky reward). Following the probability cue, participants chose between a safe (1 point with certainty) or risky option (>1 or 0 points depending on probability cue). The risky reward was either 2 or 5 points, varying across trials. In some trials the probability cue was absent (replaced by a random distractor) and the probability to win the risky reward was 50%. When probability cues were unseen, they did not influence choice, as value-maximizing choice (d’) was not greater than chance, but they did influence reaction time in both experiments. Consistent with SV integration, the BOLD signal in aVS and vmPFC was higher for both conscious rewards (high > low) and subliminal probabilities (high > low) and could not be explained by subliminal salience (cue present > absent). Moreover, multivariate pattern similarity between conscious rewards and subliminal probabilities in vmPFC suggest integration into an abstract value representation. Additionally, we found brain-wide subliminal probability and salience effects. Taken together, these results suggest that conscious awareness is not necessary for probability to be integrated with conscious rewards to form an abstract “common currency” SV representation in vmPFC. Additionally, brain-wide subliminal probability and salience effects suggests information can have “global access” without conscious awareness. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0