Comment on: Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-08+body, 2026-08-02

This commentary discusses a case of delayed intestinal perforation after HIFU treatment for uterine leiomyoma, noting similar experiences and emphasizing physician awareness and proper patient selection to prevent complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,530 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
www.ogscience.org 177 Letter to the Editor Obstet Gynecol Sci 2018;61(2):177-178 https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.2.177 pISSN 2287-8572 · eISSN 2287-8580 We read with interest the article by Hwang et al. [1] which re- ported a case of delayed intestinal perforation, uterine perfo- ration with recto-uterine fistula and vertebral osteomyelitis 29 days after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for uterine leiomyoma. This article reminds physicians that while HIFU is increasingly being considered an effective and safe option for treatment of uterine leiomyomas [2-4], often for women who wish uterine preservation, potentially serious complications can occur. Recently, we have also encountered a woman with adeno- myosis who presented with intestinal perforation 8 days after HIFU [5]. Consistent with the findings from Hwang et al.'s case [1] together with 2 other cases reported by Chen et al. [6] (presented at 10 and 20 days following HIFU), this de - layed presentation appears to be quite indicative of intestinal damage following HIFU. We speculate that tissue ablation at a temperature of only 56°C–90°C from HIFU results in a subtle and delayed intestinal damage, which may not even be obvious on imaging studies [5]. We stress the importance of physician's alertness of this delayed presentation for early rec- ognition and timely management of intestinal injury following HIFU treatment. Furthermore, prevention of such occurrence is equally important. This patient reported by Hwang et al. [1] had multiple previous abdominal surgeries including myomec - tomy, appendectomy and caesarean section; clearly at risk of extensive pelvic adhesions. In many centers, including ours, patients with known or suspected extensive pelvic adhesions, or bowel adherent to the uterus or abdominal wall, such as a history of major abdominal or pelvic surgery, pelvic inflamma- tory disease, or pelvic endometriosis, are generally considered contraindications for HIFU treatment [2-4]. This case illustrates the importance of proper patient selection when considering HIFU for uterine leiomyomas or adenomyosis, as a simple and effective means to avoid complications arising from this treat- ment modality. Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was re- ported. References 1. Hwang DW, Song HS, Kim HS, Chun KC, Koh JW, Kim YA. Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol Sci Comment on: Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma Jennifer K.Y . Ko, Vincent Y .T. Cheung Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Received: 2017.11.27. Revised: 2017.12.05. Accepted: 2017.12.05. Corresponding author: Jennifer K.Y . Ko Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F , Professorial Block, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-0645 Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology www.ogscience.org178 Vol. 61, No. 2, 2018 2017;60:490-3. 2. Cheung VY. Sonographically guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for the management of uterine fi - broids. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1353-8. 3. Cheung VY. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;46:74-83. 4. Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultra - sound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection cri - teria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96:707-14. 5. Ko JK, Seto MT, Cheung VY. Thermal bowel injury after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for uterine adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017 Nov 20 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.18965. 6. Chen J, Chen W, Zhang L, Li K, Peng S, He M, et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases. Ultrason Sonochem 2015;27:671-6.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-05T06:13:34.187606+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0