Quantitative ultrasound texture analysis for clinical decision making support
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
We propose a general ultrasound (US) texture-analysis and machine-learning framework for detecting the presence of disease that is suitable for clinical application across clinicians, disease types, devices, and operators. Its stages are image selection, image filtering, ROI selection, feature parameterization, and classification. Each stage is modular and can be replaced with alternate methods. Thus, this framework is adaptable to a wide range of tasks. Our two preliminary clinical targets are hepatic steatosis and adenomyosis diagnosis. For steatosis, we collected US images from 288 patients and their pathology-determined values of steatosis (%) from biopsies. Two radiologists independently reviewed all images and identified the region of interest (ROI) most representative of the hepatic echotexture for each patient. To parameterize the images into comparable quantities, we filter the US images at multiple scales for various texture responses. For each response, we collect a histogram of pixel features within the ROI, and parameterize it as a Gaussian function using its mean, standard deviation, kurtosis, and skew to create a 36-feature vector. Our algorithm uses a support vector machine (SVM) for classification. Using a threshold of 10%, we achieved 72.81% overall accuracy, 76.18% sensitivity, and 65.96% specificity in identifying steatosis with leave-ten-out cross-validation (p<0.0001). Extending this framework to adenomyosis, we identified 38 patients with MR-confirmed findings of adenomyosis and previous US studies and 50 controls. A single rater picked the best US-image and ROI for each case. Using the same processing pipeline, we obtained 76.14% accuracy, 86.00% sensitivity, and 63.16% specificity with leave-one-out cross-validation (p<0.0001).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (20)
- W1526451377 via openalex
- W1979300389 via openalex
- W2002435055 via openalex
- W2008285692 via openalex
- W2010595907 via openalex
- W2025105528 via openalex
- W2034087479 via openalex
- W2040197097 via openalex
- W2052472328 via openalex
- W2053093610 via openalex
- W2063603851 via openalex
- W2074082533 via openalex
- W2114376411 via openalex
- W2167003500 via openalex
- W2911964244 via openalex
- W4237805430 via openalex
- W4238801417 via openalex
- W4239510810 via openalex
- W4246241515 via openalex
- W6663853978 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK