Results
We included 788 patients to our survey. The median (IQR) duration until diagnosis after hospital admission was 12 (8–21) days. The mean age of the patients was 46.8 ± 18.1 years and 345 (43.8%) were females, 744 (94.4%) were adults (18–75 years), and 44 (5.6) were late elders (≥ 76 years). Economically, 74 (9.4%) patients were from HI, 1 (0.1%) was from LI, 297 (37.7%) were from LMI, and 416 (52.8%) were from UMI countries.
The data of patients were submitted from 21 countries: Afghanistan ( n = 1; 0.1%), Albania ( n = 31; 3.9%), Bosnia and Herzegovina ( n = 55; 6.9%), Bulgaria ( n = 37; 4.7%), Croatia ( n = 3; 0.4%), Cyprus ( n = 2; 0.3%), Egypt ( n = 75; 9.5%), Hungary ( n = 1; 0.1%), India ( n = 50; 6.3%), Iran ( n = 50; 6.3%), Italy ( n = 59; 7.5%), Kazakhstan ( n = 5; 0.6%), North Macedonia ( n = 18; 2.3%), Pakistan ( n = 7; 0.9%), Romania ( n = 33; 4.3%), Russia ( n = 5; 0.6%), Saudi Arabia ( n = 3; 0.4%), Slovakia ( n = 1; 0.1%), Tunisia ( n = 117; 14.8%), Turkey ( n = 232; 29.3%), and United Arab Emirates ( n = 5; 0.6%).
The distribution of FUO diagnoses were as follows: infections ( n = 407, 51.6%), neoplasms ( n = 90, 11.4%), collagen vascular disorders ( n = 73, 9.3%), undiagnosed ( n = 158, 20.1%), miscellaneous diseases ( n = 60, 7.7%) (Fig. 2 ). Fig. 2 Distribution of FUO diagnoses
Distribution of FUO diagnoses
Zoonoses ( n = 88): (Brucellosis ( n = 39) {no organ involvement ( n = 31); prostatitis ( n = 1); sacroiliitis ( n = 1); spondylodiscitis ( n = 6)}, rickettsiosis ( n = 23) (Q fever ( n = 11); untyped ( n = 6); Marseilles fever ( n = 4); Rickettsia conorii infection ( n = 2)), lyme disease ( n = 5), visceral leishmaniasis ( n = 4), CCHFV ( n = 3), toxoplasmosis ( n = 3), cat scratch disease ( n = 2), malaria ( n = 2), hantavirus pulmonary syndrome ( n = 1), hydatid disease (liver, n = 1), toxocariasis ( n = 2), tularemia ( n = 1), typhus ( n = 1), WNV infection ( n = 1)). Returning travelers: Two Malaria cases returning from Africa to Türkiye (Plasmodium ovale ) and Romania ( P. falciparum ) (0.5% of all infections) were associated to international travel. Cardiovascular infections ( n = 56): native valve endocarditis ( n = 44), brucellar endocarditis ( n = 3), pericarditis ( n = 3), prosthetic valve endocarditis ( n = 2), myocarditis ( n = 2), pace-maker endocarditis ( n = 1), culture negative endocarditis ( n = 1). Respiratory tract infections ( n = 36): (pneumonia ( n = 18); bronchopneumonia ( n = 3); atypical pneumonia ( Mycoplasma pneumoniae n = 3; Chlamydia pneumoniae n = 1; Chlamydia psittaci n = 1; untyped n = 2); empyema ( n = 2); actinomycosis ( n = 1); Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia ( n = 1); pulmonary tuberculosis ( n = 1); maxillary sinusitis ( n = 1); atypical measles ( n = 1); obliterating bronchiolitis ( n = 1); tonsillopharyngitis ( n = 1)). Urogenital infections ( n = 35): urosepsis ( n = 11); lower urinary tract infections ( n = 11); pyelonephritis ( n = 8); chronic cystitis ( n = 1, Ureaplasma urealyticum ); hydro/pyonefrosis ( n = 1); pelvic infection ( n = 1); perinephritis ( n = 1), gonorrhea ( n = 1). Intestinal infections ( n = 23): typhoid fever ( n = 13), neutropenic colitis ( n = 3), Clostridioides difficile colitis ( n = 2), enterocolitis, untyped ( n = 1), diverticulitis ( n = 2), colon perforation ( n = 1), typhlitis ( n = 1). Viral infections ( n = 39): (HIV/AIDS ( n = 20); EBV infection ( n = 8); CMV infection ( n = 7); COVID-19 ( n = 2); parvovirus infection ( n = 1); retroviral infection ( n = 1)). Tuberculosis ( n = 45): (pulmonary ( n = 15); miliary ( n = 11); lymphadenitis ( n = 7); peritoneal ( n = 4); pleurisy ( n = 3); hepatic ( n = 2); intestinal ( n = 2); mediastinal ( n = 1)), Central nervous system infections ( n = 17): meningitis, untyped ( n = 7); tuberculous meningitis ( n = 1); brucellar meningitis ( n = 1); thoraco-lumbar myelitis ( n = 1); HIV encephalitis ( n = 1); ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection ( n = 1); viral encephalitis (untyped ( n = 3); Toscana virus ( n = 1)), cryptococcal meningitis ( n = 1). Bacteremia of unidentified origin ( n = 10): Staphylococcus aureus ( n = 4); Klebsiella pneumoniae ( n = 2); Enterococcus faecalis ( n = 1); Streptococcus constellatus ( n = 1); Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( n = 1); Acinetobacter baumannii ( n = 1); Escherichia coli ( n = 1). Bone and joint infections ( n = 9): (spondylodiscitis ( n = 7); skull base osteomyelitis ( n = 1); sacroiliitis ( n = 1)). Skin and soft tissue infections ( n = 5): (bedsore infection ( n = 3); lymphadenitis ( n = 1); lymphangitis ( n = 1)). Hepatobiliary infections ( n = 4): cholecystitis ( n = 4). Fungal diseases ( n = 4): hepato-splenic candidiasis ( n = 2), mucormycosis ( n = 1), fusariasis ( n = 1). Periodontitis ( n = 1). Abscess formations ( n = 33)
Zoonoses ( n = 88): (Brucellosis ( n = 39) {no organ involvement ( n = 31); prostatitis ( n = 1); sacroiliitis ( n = 1); spondylodiscitis ( n = 6)}, rickettsiosis ( n = 23) (Q fever ( n = 11); untyped ( n = 6); Marseilles fever ( n = 4); Rickettsia conorii infection ( n = 2)), lyme disease ( n = 5), visceral leishmaniasis ( n = 4), CCHFV ( n = 3), toxoplasmosis ( n = 3), cat scratch disease ( n = 2), malaria ( n = 2), hantavirus pulmonary syndrome ( n = 1), hydatid disease (liver, n = 1), toxocariasis ( n = 2), tularemia ( n = 1), typhus ( n = 1), WNV infection ( n = 1)).
Returning travelers: Two Malaria cases returning from Africa to Türkiye (Plasmodium ovale ) and Romania ( P. falciparum ) (0.5% of all infections) were associated to international travel.
Cardiovascular infections ( n = 56): native valve endocarditis ( n = 44), brucellar endocarditis ( n = 3), pericarditis ( n = 3), prosthetic valve endocarditis ( n = 2), myocarditis ( n = 2), pace-maker endocarditis ( n = 1), culture negative endocarditis ( n = 1).
Respiratory tract infections ( n = 36): (pneumonia ( n = 18); bronchopneumonia ( n = 3); atypical pneumonia ( Mycoplasma pneumoniae n = 3; Chlamydia pneumoniae n = 1; Chlamydia psittaci n = 1; untyped n = 2); empyema ( n = 2); actinomycosis ( n = 1); Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia ( n = 1); pulmonary tuberculosis ( n = 1); maxillary sinusitis ( n = 1); atypical measles ( n = 1); obliterating bronchiolitis ( n = 1); tonsillopharyngitis ( n = 1)).
Urogenital infections ( n = 35): urosepsis ( n = 11); lower urinary tract infections ( n = 11); pyelonephritis ( n = 8); chronic cystitis ( n = 1, Ureaplasma urealyticum ); hydro/pyonefrosis ( n = 1); pelvic infection ( n = 1); perinephritis ( n = 1), gonorrhea ( n = 1).
Intestinal infections ( n = 23): typhoid fever ( n = 13), neutropenic colitis ( n = 3), Clostridioides difficile colitis ( n = 2), enterocolitis, untyped ( n = 1), diverticulitis ( n = 2), colon perforation ( n = 1), typhlitis ( n = 1).
Viral infections ( n = 39): (HIV/AIDS ( n = 20); EBV infection ( n = 8); CMV infection ( n = 7); COVID-19 ( n = 2); parvovirus infection ( n = 1); retroviral infection ( n = 1)).
Tuberculosis ( n = 45): (pulmonary ( n = 15); miliary ( n = 11); lymphadenitis ( n = 7); peritoneal ( n = 4); pleurisy ( n = 3); hepatic ( n = 2); intestinal ( n = 2); mediastinal ( n = 1)),
Central nervous system infections ( n = 17): meningitis, untyped ( n = 7); tuberculous meningitis ( n = 1); brucellar meningitis ( n = 1); thoraco-lumbar myelitis ( n = 1); HIV encephalitis ( n = 1); ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection ( n = 1); viral encephalitis (untyped ( n = 3); Toscana virus ( n = 1)), cryptococcal meningitis ( n = 1).
Bacteremia of unidentified origin ( n = 10): Staphylococcus aureus ( n = 4); Klebsiella pneumoniae ( n = 2); Enterococcus faecalis ( n = 1); Streptococcus constellatus ( n = 1); Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( n = 1); Acinetobacter baumannii ( n = 1); Escherichia coli ( n = 1).
Bone and joint infections ( n = 9): (spondylodiscitis ( n = 7); skull base osteomyelitis ( n = 1); sacroiliitis ( n = 1)).
Skin and soft tissue infections ( n = 5): (bedsore infection ( n = 3); lymphadenitis ( n = 1); lymphangitis ( n = 1)).
Hepatobiliary infections ( n = 4): cholecystitis ( n = 4).
Fungal diseases ( n = 4): hepato-splenic candidiasis ( n = 2), mucormycosis ( n = 1), fusariasis ( n = 1).
Periodontitis ( n = 1).
Abscess formations ( n = 33)
• Intra-abdominal abscesses ( n = 24 ): liver ( n =7), intraabdominal ( n =4), renal ( n =4), pericecal ( n =2), amebic liver ( n =1), diverticular ( n =1), gall bladder ( n =1), iliopsoas ( n =1), perianal ( n =1), uterine ( n =1), subhepatic ( n =1). • CNS abscesses ( n = 3 ): epidural brucellar ( n =1), cerebral ( n =1), epidydimal ( n =1). • Pulmonary abscesses ( n = 2 ): lungs ( n =2). • Other abscesses ( n = 4 ): paravertebral ( n =2), dental ( n =1), subcutaneous ( n =1).
• Intra-abdominal abscesses ( n = 24 ): liver ( n =7), intraabdominal ( n =4), renal ( n =4), pericecal ( n =2), amebic liver ( n =1), diverticular ( n =1), gall bladder ( n =1), iliopsoas ( n =1), perianal ( n =1), uterine ( n =1), subhepatic ( n =1).
• CNS abscesses ( n = 3 ): epidural brucellar ( n =1), cerebral ( n =1), epidydimal ( n =1).
• Pulmonary abscesses ( n = 2 ): lungs ( n =2).
• Other abscesses ( n = 4 ): paravertebral ( n =2), dental ( n =1), subcutaneous ( n =1).
Solid cancers ( n = 27): lung ( n = 8), colorectal ( n = 3), adrenal gland ( n = 3), neuroendocrine ( n = 2), renal ( n = 2), pancreas ( n = 2), liver ( n = 1), endometrium ( n = 1), head and neck ( n = 1), primary unknown ( n = 1), prostate ( n = 1), bone ( n = 1), right atrium myxoma ( n = 1). Hematological malignancies ( n = 60) : Lymphomas ( n = 50): non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( n = 25), Hodgkin lymphoma ( n = 19), T-cell lymphoma ( n = 4), anaplastic lymphoma ( n = 2). Leukemias ( n = 13): acute lymphocytic leukemia ( n = 4), acute myeloid leukemia ( n = 5), chronic myeloid leukemia ( n = 2), multiple myeloma ( n = 2).
Solid cancers ( n = 27): lung ( n = 8), colorectal ( n = 3), adrenal gland ( n = 3), neuroendocrine ( n = 2), renal ( n = 2), pancreas ( n = 2), liver ( n = 1), endometrium ( n = 1), head and neck ( n = 1), primary unknown ( n = 1), prostate ( n = 1), bone ( n = 1), right atrium myxoma ( n = 1).
Hematological malignancies ( n = 60) :
Lymphomas ( n = 50): non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( n = 25), Hodgkin lymphoma ( n = 19), T-cell lymphoma ( n = 4), anaplastic lymphoma ( n = 2).
Leukemias ( n = 13): acute lymphocytic leukemia ( n = 4), acute myeloid leukemia ( n = 5), chronic myeloid leukemia ( n = 2), multiple myeloma ( n = 2).
Adult-onset Still's disease ( n = 24), systemic lupus erythematosus ( n = 8), polymyalgia rheumatica ( n = 6), polyarteritis nodosa ( n = 5), rheumatoid arthritis ( n = 4), temporal arteritis ( n = 4), large-vessel vasculitis ( n = 3), reactive arthritis ( n = 3), Behcet’s disease ( n = 2), myelitis ( n = 1), familial Mediterranean fever ( n = 1), giant cell arteritis ( n = 1), gout arthritis ( n = 1), Henoch Schoenlein purpura ( n = 1), inflammatory myositis ( n = 1), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis ( n = 1), autoimmune hepatitis ( n = 1), lupus nephropathy ( n = 1), polymyositis ( n = 1), seronegative arthropathy ( n = 1), small vessel vasculitis ( n = 1), Takayasu disease ( n = 1), Wegener granulomatosis ( n = 1).
Thyroiditis ( n = 12), histiocytosis ( n = 7), Crohn’s disease ( n = 5), macrophage activation syndrome ( n = 4), familial Mediterranean fever ( n = 4), sarcoidosis ( n = 3), embolic events ( n = 3), hemophagocytic syndrome ( n = 3), Kikuchi disease ( n = 3), ulcerative colitis ( n = 2), aplastic anemia ( n = 1), polycythemia vera ( n = 1), autoimmune thyroiditis ( n = 1), chronic fatigue syndrome ( n = 1), cholecystitis ( n = 1), cirrhosis ( n = 1), primary biliary cirrhosis ( n = 1), colon perforation ( n = 1), Churg-Strauss syndrome ( n = 1), endometriosis (n = 1), drug induced fever ( n = 1), hepatic arterial thrombosis ( n = 1), Horton disease ( n = 1), neuroleptic malignant syndrome ( n = 1).
Overall, 201 (25.5%) patients were performed invasive sampling for FUO diagnosis. Invasive diagnostic sampling of FUO patients in accordance with the economic statuses are presented in Table 1 . Diagnostic biopsies were done in 22 (29.7%) of HI country patients, in 90 ( n = 21.6%) UMI country patients, and in 89 (29.9%) LMI country patients. There was a significant difference between the three economic statuses and performing biopsies (chi-square = 7.07, p = 0.029). Table 1 Invasive diagnostic sampling in accordance with economic statuses HI ( n = 74) UMI ( n = 416) LMI ( n = 297) LI ( n = 1) Lymph node bx ( n = 188) 21 (28.4%) 85 (20.4%) 82 (27.6%) Bone marrow bx ( n = 57) 9 (4.7%) 28 (6.7%) 20 (6.7%) Liver bx ( n = 13) 3 (0.7%) 10 (3.4%) Colon bx ( n = 11) 3 (4.1%) 5 (1.2%) 3 (1%) Skin bx ( n = 11) 1 (1.4%) 4 (1%) 6 (2%) Temporal artery bx ( n = 7) 3 (0.7%) 4 (1.3%) Kidney bx ( n = 5) 5 (1.7%) Lung bx ( n = 5) 2 (0.5% %) 3 (1%) Pleura bx ( n = 2) 1 (0.2%) Thyroid bx ( n = 2) 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.3%) Prostate bx ( n = 1) 1 (0.3%) İleum bx ( n = 1) 1 (0.2%) Gastric bx ( n = 1) 1 (1.4%) HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income, Bx biopsy
Invasive diagnostic sampling in accordance with economic statuses
HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income, Bx biopsy
Compared to residents of LI and LMI countries, having FUO among residents of HI and UMI countries does not significantly predict the diagnosis of infections ( RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80–1.05), and neoplasms ( RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.73–1.66). Similarly, comparing HI vs UMI vs LMI countries, having FUO does not significantly predict the diagnosis of infection ( χ 2 = 0.5046, p = 0.777), and neoplasms ( χ 2 = 2.4270 p = 0.297). However, collagen vascular disorders ( RR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.19–3.38) were more likely to be reported from HI and UMI countries compared to LMI and LI countries. When HI vs UMI vs LMI countries were compared, FUO significantly predicts the diagnosis of collagen vascular disorders ( χ 2 = 7.5526, p = 0.023).
Compared to non-late elderly age group, having FUO among the late elderly population does not significantly predict the diagnoses of infection ( RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.85–1.45), neoplasms ( RR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.70–2.89), and collagen vascular disorders ( RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.12–1.88) (Tables 2 and 3 ). The relationships between inflammatory markers and FUO diagnoses are shown in Table 4 ; the outcomes of FUO in accordance with economic statuses are presented in Table 5 . We could not disclose any significant difference for death attributable to FUO when HI vs UMI vs LMI countries were compared ( χ 2 = 1.62, p = 0.440). Similarly, the mean duration of days until diagnosis after hospitalization did not differ across the economic statuses ( p = 0.9663). Table 2 FUO categories and economic status Diagnoses High-income countries ( n = 74) Upper-middle income countries ( n = 416) Low-middle income countries ( n = 297) Low income countries ( n = 1) Infections ( n = 407) 36 209 162 0 Neoplasms ( n = 90) 5 53 32 0 CVD ( n = 73) 7 49 17 0 Undiagnosed ( n = 158) 14 79 64 1 Other ( n = 60) 12 26 22 0 CVD collagen vascular disorders Table 3 Comparison of FUO distributions in accordance with the economic statuses Etiology of FUO Relative risk (95% CI) Pearson chi-square χ2 p -value Infections Non-infections HI/UMI 245/407 245/381 0.92 (0.80–1.05) 1.41 0.2347 LMI/LI 162/407 136/381 Neoplasms Non-neoplasms HI/UMI 58/90 432/698 1.10 (0.73–1.66) 0.22 0.633 LMI/LI 32/90 266/698 CVDs Non-CVDs HI/UMI 56/73 434/715 2.00 (1.19–3.38) 7.22 0.0072 LMI/LI 17/73 281/715 Undiagnosed All Others HI/UMI 93/158 397/630 0.87 (0.65–1.15) 0.93 0.3355 LMI/LI 65/158 233/630 Aging and FUO Infections Non—infections Late elderly 25/407 19/381 1.11 (0.85–1.45) 0.50 0.4802 Non-late elderly 382/407 362/381 Neoplasms Non-neoplasms Late elderly 7/90 37/699 1.43 (0.70–2.89) 0.93 0.3355 Non-late elderly 83/90 661/699 CVDs Non-CVDs Late elderly 2/73 42/715 0.48 (0.12–1.88) 1.23 0.2666 Non-late elderly 71/73 673/715 Undiagnosed All Others Late elderly 9/158 35/630 1.02 (0.56–1.86) 0.00 0.9451 Non-late elderly 149/158 595/630 CVD collagen vascular disorders, HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income Table 4 Examining for the relationships between inflammatory markers and FUO diagnoses Infections Neoplasms CVD Undiagnosed Other diseases F test p CRP (mg/l) n = 392, 120.9 ± 108.6 n = 88, 129.2 ± 103.7 n = 71, 108.4 ± 84.1 n = 148, 120.6 ± 95.6 n = 61, 108.5 ± 121.5 0.58 0.6762 WBC (/μL) n = 406, 9868.0 ± 6807.0 n = 90, 7602.3 ± 6183.9 n = 73, 11,129.8 ± 5610.1 n = 158, 8804.9 ± 5833.9 n = 60, 11,012.7 ± 21,297.9 2.69 0.0300 ESR (mm/h) n = 349, 66.06 ± 52.49 n = 80, 66.9 ± 35.7 n = 70, 8.41 ± 33.5 n = 125, 61.8 ± 39.2 n = 54, 60.0 ± 39.1 1.59 0.1765 Ferritin (ng/ml) n = 185, 875.2 ± 2574.2 n = 61, 2102.9 ± 4191.4 n = 63, 2788.5 ± 6451.3 n = 72, 1815.1 ± 4195.2 n = 36, 3477.4 ± 8707.5 3.82 0.0046 Cr (mg/dl) n = 402, 1.0 ± 0.6 n = 87, 0.9 ± 0.3 n = 72, 0.8 ± 0.5 n = 153, 0.9 ± 0.8 n = 59, 0.9 ± 0.4 1.18 0.3195 CRP C-reactive protein, PCT procalcitonin, WBC white blood cell count, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Cr creatinine, CVD collagen vascular disorders Table 5 FUO outcomes in accordance with economic statuses HI ( n = 74) UMI ( n = 416) LMI ( n = 297) LI ( n = 1) Died; attributed to FUO ( n = 50, 6.3%) 2 29 19 0 Died; NOT attributable to FUO ( n = 17, 2.1%) 1 11 5 0 Transferred to another unit ( n = 71, 9%) 5 36 29 1 Still at hospital ( n = 7, 0.9%) 0 2 5 0 Discharged with cure ( n = 386, 49%) 47 198 141 0 Discharged with sequelae ( n = 129, 16.4%) 17 36 76 0 Discharged as she/he is ( n = 120, 15.2%) 2 97 21 0 No information ( n = 8, 1%) 0 7 1 0 CVD collagen vascular disease, HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income
FUO categories and economic status
CVD collagen vascular disorders
Comparison of FUO distributions in accordance with the economic statuses
CVD collagen vascular disorders, HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income
Examining for the relationships between inflammatory markers and FUO diagnoses
CRP C-reactive protein, PCT procalcitonin, WBC white blood cell count, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Cr creatinine, CVD collagen vascular disorders
FUO outcomes in accordance with economic statuses
CVD collagen vascular disease, HI high income, LI low-income, LMI low-middle income, UMI upper-middle income
Discussion
FUO cases are a critical group of patients with 6.3% attributable mortality according to our data. Traditionally numerous causes of classic FUO fall within five categories: infections, neoplasms, connective tissue diseases, miscellaneous other disorders, and undiagnosed illnesses [ 10 ]. Infections had long been the leading causes of classical FUO [ 1 , 2 ]. Accordingly, febrile conditions are the optimum timings of consultations from infectious diseases departments and increase the workloads of these services [ 11 ]. In recent FUO papers from LMI countries, infections ranged from 43 to 63% establishing the majority of FUO cases while neoplasms comprised 1–22%, and collagen vascular disorders made up 13–30%, miscellaneous diseases comprised 2–14%, and undiagnosed FUO patients had a share of 2–12% [ 12 – 15 ]. The distributions of FUO diagnoses in FUO reports from richer (UMI and HI) countries were infections 15–49%, neoplasms 7–18%, collagen vascular disorders 19–47%, miscellaneous diseases 1–13%, and undiagnosed 8–30% [ 16 – 23 ]. Thus, there has been an understanding that FUO due to infections was most likely to be related to countries with limited resources, and developed or richer countries have predilections for noninfectious subsets of FUO diagnoses like neoplasms or collagen vascular disorders [ 2 , 24 ]. However, we could not disclose such relationships for the entire FUO groups other than collagen vascular disorders, which were more frequently reported from richer countries. Although it appears that the disseminated knowledge and improving health infrastructures worldwide have a tendency to uniform the diagnoses for infections and neoplasms, the collagen vascular disorders were not equally identified and less commonly detected in country groups with lower economic incomes. Since our study pooled relatively new FUO patients followed in the last 5 years, this datum appears to be the new trend in the context of FUO diagnoses. In addition, either the duration of diagnosis for FUO cases or patients without diagnosis did not differ between the richer countries and those with the limited resources showing a degree of standardization.
Actually, economic welfare may not always be translated as a high Human Development Index, which is a statistic composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income [ 25 ]. In addition, wide geographical distribution of the participating centers may have resulted in diverse epidemiological exposures. Hence, other developmental parameters may disclose variations in FUO epidemiology, rather than the economic status. Accordingly, there had been an understanding that infections were less common in the elderly population compared to non-elderly [ 10 ]. But it was not the case in this study. Moreover, attributable FUO mortality was not significantly different between richer countries and those with limited resources. There seemed to be a uniformity in the distribution and outcomes of FUO diagnoses in the participating centers, and the delayed diagnosis is likely to be due to subtle nature of FUO causes rather than the economic prosperity.
In this study, half of FUO diagnoses were infections, which can have fatal outcomes when timely and rational antimicrobial treatment are not provided [ 26 ]. Although infections as the agents of FUO tend to vary in incidence according to locale, the leading community-acquired infections for classical FUO were tuberculosis, brucellosis, rickettsiosis, HIV infection, and typhoid fever in this survey. Tuberculosis has long been one of the common causes of FUO [ 24 , 27 ] and brucellosis is the most frequent zoonotic infection worldwide [ 28 ] so that they were two of the common infections causing FUO. Since zoonoses are a heterogenous group of syndromes and cardiovascular infections are a uniform clinical entity, we can say that cardiovascular infections are the most common infectious syndromes among our FUO cases. We found that native valve endocarditis in particular, comprising more than two thirds of cardiovascular infections in routine medical practice [ 29 ], was the most common infectious syndromes among our FUO cases. The other common cause of FUO “bacteremia of unidentified origin” in this study may represent cardiovascular infections where the diagnosis could not be well established, too. Hence, any type of bacteremia in a FUO patient should warrant investigation for cardiovascular infections. In addition, pulmonary infections with atypical patterns, urogenital infections, and central nervous system infections with rare presentations were the other common syndromic infectious FUO presentations. Abscesses, intraabdominal locations as the most prominent, were not rare suppurative foci compelling the need of well-established radiological diagnosis in this study. Since infections imposes serious challenges and high mortality when untreated [ 26 ], early diagnosis in which even invasive procedures are shown to be needed in one-fourth of FUO patients in our study. Interestingly, biopsies were performed more commonly in LMI countries according to our data.
Returning travelers is a certain subset of patients in FUO series in which malaria, typhoid fever, and acute HIV infection were commonly recorded [ 10 ]. In routine medical practice, intestinal and respiratory infections including pneumonia and tuberculosis followed by malaria, visceral leishmaniasis, and hemorrhagic fevers are the common etiologies in severely infected travelers and migrants [ 3 , 30 ]. We detected malaria only as the causes of FUO in this subgroup of patient population. This is the most common mosquito-borne disease with major epidemiological outbreaks in the equatorial, tropical, and subtropical climate zones of mainly in Africa and to a lesser extent in Asia, Central America, and Southern America. Another potential reason for FUO in this group of persons could be lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis) which is endemic to Africa. In fact, the reasons for FUO in returning travelers are too many as with other people who have not had a trip. Here, too, the potential and most likely cause is an infectious disease caused by bacteria or parasites. Therefore, in FUO patients coming from countries with a high prevalence of any infection, it is appropriate to investigate the most common infections found in the country they have visited. The patient’s contact history for any type of infected patients, skin rashes, bites including vectors, water, and food consumption history should be questioned in detail.
The next common FUO category comprises neoplastic diseases, most commonly hematological malignancies including lymphomas and leukemias followed by solid cancers. The third leading cause of classical FUO is collagen vascular disorders where adult-onset Still’s disease is the most common followed by systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyalgia rheumatica, and polyarteritis nodosa in this study. When the inflammatory markers are compared among the diagnostic categories, ferritin and leucocyte count was significantly higher in the FUO patients without an established diagnosis, and this result may likely to stress the presence of non-infectious inflammatory diseases or collagen vascular disorders in patients without a diagnosis. Histopathologic examination of tissues, which appears to be the last bullet for definitive diagnosis, can provide a final diagnosis in FUO patients in fewer than half of cases[ 31 ], and thus one fourth of our patients were performed histopathological examination to reach a definitive diagnosis.
The current research has some limitations that need to be addressed. First, the study has a retrospective design, although we included only patients followed in the last 5 years. Second, the medical centers participating in this survey have heterogenous diagnostic capacities due to the different economic developments of their countries. Third, because of heterogeneity of FUO cases, the number of patients included in the study is very low for particular subsets of diagnoses. Finally, the numbers of patients included from each country were variable, and thus, the patients may not be representative of all patients for FUO in their particular countries. However, as a strength, we categorized and analyzed the patients according to the economic level of the countries they belong. Despite the aforementioned limitations, this work represents the first research on patients with FUO from countries with different economic stages of development.
In conclusion, the diagnosis of FUO should be tailored according to the common disorders causing FUO. In this regard, it is a serious difficulty to implement diagnostic protocols for patients with FUO and a potential FUO protocol cannot cover all possible causes of this medical problem. Our results and data from other studies show that regardless of the economic development of the countries, the leading causes of FUO are similar and still conventional. Hence, the clinicians worldwide should be aware of the current FUO epidemiology, which is unaffected from economic status to ease clinical decision making.