Introduction
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Despite significant advances in cancer research and treatment, breast cancer remains one
of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women [1]. Among its subtypes, triple-negative
breast cancer (TNBC) is particularly aggressive, accounting for up to 20% of cases and
contributing disproportionately to breast cancer mortality [2, 3]. TNBC lacks expression of
estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2),
making it refractory to targeted and endocrine therapies and associated with high rates of
metastasis and relapse. A growing body of evidence indicates that the tumor microenvironment
(TME), a complex network of immune cells, stromal components, extracellular matrix, and
inflammatory mediators, plays a vital role in TNBC progression and immune evasion[4-7].
Efforts to activate anti-tumor immunity have led to the development of immune
checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) /programmed cell death
ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), which have
revolutionized treatment for many cancers. Of the different types of breast cancer, TNBC—the
most aggressive subtype with higher immunogenicity—is uniquely eligible for first-line
immunotherapy [8-11]. However, the success of ICIs in TNBC has been modest, with many
cases marked by primary or acquired treatment failure [12-15]. While several mechanisms
underlie ICI resistance, increasing evidence points to a novel player in immune modulation
within the TME, platelets, which extend far beyond their classical role in hemostasis [2, 16]. In
particular, tumor-associated platelets (TAPs) engage in direct interactions with immune cells via
adhesion molecules such as P-selectin and its ligand P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1),
influencing leukocyte trafficking, T cell differentiation, and functional activation [17-19].
Studies have also shown that elevated platelet counts predict poor prognosis in cancer patients
[2, 20, 21]. These findings suggest that platelets are not passive bystanders, but active regulators
of immune suppression.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Upon interaction with tumor cells, platelets undergo phenotypic reprogramming to
become TAPs, adopting a pro-tumoral profile characterized by increased secretion of
immunosuppressive cytokines and surface molecule expression [22-25]. TAPs release
transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition
(EMT) and suppresses effector T cell function [26, 27]. In parallel, platelet-derived PD-L1 is
increasingly recognized in both tumor and peripheral compartments as a contributor to T cell
inhibition [28]. We previously showed that TAPs form aggregates with tumor cells, shielding
them from immune detection by upregulating PD-L1 and phosphorylated epidermal growth
factor receptor (pEGFR), thus promoting immune evasion [24]. These immunomodulatory
features place TAPs at the intersection of tumor survival and immune escape.
P-selectin is a transmembrane glycoprotein, mainly derived from platelets and endothelial
cells, that upon platelet activation translocates from the membrane of α-granules to the cell
surface during exocytosis[29, 30]. Under physiological conditions, it facilitates leukocyte
adhesion to activated endothelium and platelets through binding to its primary ligand, PSGL-1
[31]. However, in the tumor microenvironment, P-selectin contributes to cancer progression by
promoting tumor cell–platelet aggregation, shielding tumor cells from immune surveillance, and
facilitating metastatic spread [32-36]. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has
revealed that elevated expression of the gene encoding P-selectin (SELP) is associated with
worse overall survival in multiple cancer types, including glioblastoma, melanoma, breast
cancer, and colon cancer [37, 38]. These findings highlight the potential immunosuppressive role
of P-selectin in cancer and raise the question of whether targeting the P-selectin/PSGL-1 axis
could enhance anti-tumor immune responses, particularly in immunologically cold tumors such
as TNBC.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are crucial mediators of anti-tumor immunity and
central targets of immunotherapy. Yet, in the TME, their activity is blunted by suppressive
networks involving tumor cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts
[39]. TAPs may serve as an additional brake on T cell function through their expression of PD-
L1, secretion of TGF-β, and direct cell-cell interactions. In particular, the P-selectin/PSGL-1 axis
has been implicated in skewing CD4+ T cell differentiation toward Tregs and impairing effector
T cell activation in inflammatory disease [40-43]. However, emerging evidence indicates that the
P-selectin/PSGL-1 axis plays a role in modulating the immune response in various diseases such
as cancer. It has been shown that PSGL-1 acts as a negative regulator of T-cell immune response,
therefore facilitating tumor growth in cancerous phenotypes [44]. These platelet-mediated
mechanisms likely contribute to T cell exhaustion and diminished ICI efficacy in TNBC.
We hypothesized that TAPs promote immune evasion in TNBC by suppressing CD4+
and CD8+ T cell function through PD-L1 expression and P-selectin/PSGL-1-mediated adhesion,
collectively driving T cell exhaustion and immunotherapy resistance. To test this, we utilized in
vitro co-culture systems with mouse and human T cells and TAPs, in vivo syngeneic TNBC
models, and immunophenotyping to assess T cell cytotoxicity, exhaustion markers, and
checkpoint expression. Because P-selectin has been implicated as a driver of TAP–immune
interactions, we examined whether its blockade could restore T cell function. To this end, we
employed Crizanlizumab, an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody against P-selectin that is
currently used to prevent vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease[45, 46].
Together, these approaches enabled us to evaluate the therapeutic potential of P-selectin
inhibition with Crizanlizumab as a strategy to overcome TAP-mediated immune suppression in
TNBC.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Methods
Sex as a Biological Variable and Study Approval
Our study exclusively examined female patients and mice, as approximately 99% of breast
cancer cases are in females [47]. Mouse experiments were approved under BWH IACUC
protocol #2019N000011; human samples were collected with informed consent under Dana-
Farber/Harvard Cancer Center IRB approval and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Mice
Female C57BL/6 (Jackson #000664) and B6;129S2-Selp^tm1Hyn/J (Jackson #008437) mice (9
wk) were injected with 2.5 × 10⁵ AT-3 cells (PBS) into the mammary fat pad. Once tumors
reached 100 mm³, mice received PBS, anti–PD-1 (150 μg i.p. q4d), RB40.34 (30 μg i.p. 3×/wk),
or combination therapy. Tumor volumes were measured by calipers [½(length × width²)] thrice
weekly pre-treatment and daily post-treatment; n = 5–10/group [48].
Platelet Isolation
Mouse blood was collected by cardiac puncture into 3.8% trisodium citrate, diluted 1:1 with
Tyrode buffer, and centrifuged (200 × g, 10 min, RT) for PRP. Prostaglandin E1 (1 μM; Sigma
#P5515) was added, PRP spun (400 × g, 10 min), and pellets resuspended in serum-free RPMI or
TCM at 2 × 10⁸/mL (used <3 h).
Human blood (sex-matched healthy donors or metastatic TNBC patients not on platelet
inhibitors) was processed similarly: PRP (200 × g, 10 min, RT), PGE1 (Sigma #P5515-1MG,
1:50), centrifuged (400 × g, 10 min), washed in platelet buffer (20 mM HEPES, 138 mM NaCl,
2.9 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 0.36 mM NaH₂PO₄, 100 mM EGTA, 5 mM glucose, pH 7.4), and
resuspended at 2 × 10⁸/mL.
Flow cytometry
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) were stained under three conditions: resting, TAPs, or CRP-activated
(Pplus Medical #CRP-A0.5-WIN03, 1 μg/mL). Antibodies included CD62P (RB40.34), CD274
(10F.9G2), Galectin-9 (RG9-35), I-Ab (AF6-120.1), CD86 (GL1), CD155 (TX56), Galectin-3
(M3/38). Samples were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (Thermo #J19943-K2) and analyzed on
Cytek with FlowJo v10.
Mouse spleens were processed into single-cell suspensions (RPMI + 10% FBS, 70 μm strainer;
Thermo), RBC-lysed, and stained with Zombie NIR (BioLegend #423105) plus antibodies
(Supplementary Tables 1–2) [49]. Human PBMCs (10 mL blood, Ficoll separation, RBC lysis)
were stained similarly (Supplementary Table 3). Intracellular staining used
fixation/permeabilization kits (Thermo Fisher #00-5523-00 or BioLegend) with markers
including IFN-γ, Grz-B, TOX, TCF-1, FOXP3. All acquired on Cytek/FlowJo; gating in
Supplementary Figures 1–2.
T cell isolation and activation
Mouse CD3⁺ cells were isolated (EasySep #19851) from AT-3–bearing spleens, cultured in
RPMI + 10% FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/mL pen/strep, and activated with IL-2 (Thermo #212-
12-20UG) and Dynabeads CD3/CD28 (Thermo #11456D, 1:1) for 48 h. Human CD3⁺ cells were
enriched from PBMCs (EasySep #17951), cultured similarly, and activated with IL-2
(PeproTech #200-02) and Dynabeads CD3/CD28 (Thermo #11131D).
T Cell–Platelet Co-culture and Cytotoxicity
CD3⁺ T cells were cultured for 48 h in serum-free RPMI with: (a) T cells alone, (b) TCM, (c)
resting platelets, or (d) TAPs (T cell:platelet ratio 1:250 [42]. For cytotoxicity, T cells were co-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
cultured with AT-3 cells (3,000/well, seeded 24 h prior) at 10:1 for 16 h. Apoptosis was
measured by caspase-3/7 (Thermo #C10423), Zombie NIR, and CD3.
Cell Culture and Tumor cell conditioned media (TCM) preparation
AT-3 (Sigma SCC178; RRID:CVL_VR89), E0771 (ATCC CRL-3461), and MDA-MB-231
(ATCC HTB-26) cells were maintained in DMEM + 10% FBS + 1% pen/strep. For TCM,
confluent AT-3 or MDA-MB-231 cells were washed, incubated 24 h in serum-free RPMI,
centrifuged (1000 × g, 5 min), and supernatants stored at −80 °C.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism v10 was used. Unless otherwise noted, Student’s t-test was applied.
Significance as *, P< 0.05; **, P< 0.01; *** P< 0.001.
Results
Tumor associated platelets (TAPs) Impair Effector T Cell Function and Promote
Exhaustion
To determine whether tumor-activated platelets (TAPs) contribute directly to immune evasion,
we developed a platelet–T cell co-culture system. For each experiment, platelets were isolated
from two healthy mice; platelets from one mouse were kept resting in serum-free RPMI, while
platelets from the other were cultured for 10 minutes in AT-3 tumor cell–conditioned medium
(TCM) derived from the murine TNBC cell line AT-3 to generate tumor-activated platelets
(TAPs). Building on our previous work demonstrating that platelets become activated in TCM
media to become TAPs, we used this system as an in vitro model to study TAP–T cell
interactions [25, 50]. T cells were isolated from AT-3 tumor–bearing mice two days prior to the
experiment, activated with CD3/CD28 and IL-2 for 48 hours, and then co-cultured in serum-free
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
RPMI for 48 hours under one of four conditions: (i) T cells alone, (ii) TCM alone + T cells, (iii)
resting platelets + T cells , or (iv) TAPs + T cells (Figure 1A). Flow cytometric analysis using a
20-antibody panel revealed that co-culture with TAP resulted in a significant decrease in
expression associated with effector potential markers on both CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells
compared T cells that had been co-cultured with resting platelets or TCM alone (Figure
1B&1C). Importantly, neither TCM alone nor resting platelets (i.e., not exposed to TCM)
reduced T cell functional markers, indicating that platelet exposure to TAPs is required to elicit
these changes.
To identify potential mediators of platelet-induced T cell suppression, we examined platelet
surface markers previously implicated in activation, adhesion, and immune modulation. These
included checkpoint ligands (PD-L1, CD155), adhesion molecules (P-selectin, CD86), galectins
(Galectin-3, Galectin-9), and the antigen presentation molecule I-Ab. The AT-3- TAPs -activated
platelets exhibited elevated expressions of PD-L1, P-Selectin, Galectin-3, Galectin-9 and I-Ab
compared to resting or collagen-related peptide (CRP)-activated controls (Supplementary
Figure 2A-G), suggesting multiple potential inhibitory interactions with T cells [51-56]. Given
that P-Selectin is a principal mediator of platelet adhesion and PD-L1 is a well-established
immune checkpoint, and based on our lab’s previous investigations of these molecules, we
prioritized them to interrogate platelet-mediated T cell suppression while limiting the scope to
the most functionally relevant targets [20, 24, 36, 57-59]. We then looked for their cognate
receptors on T cells. T cells co-cultured with TAPs showed markedly increased expression of the
immune checkpoint and exhaustion markers, Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and P-
selectin Glycoprotein Ligand 1 (PSGL-1), on both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ effector T cells compared to
T cells that were cocultured with TCM alone, resting platelets, or alone without platelets (Figure
1D&1E).
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
To assess cytotoxic capacity, T cells previously co-cultured for 48 hours were incubated with
AT-3 tumor cells in the presence of a caspase 3/7 death dye (Figure 1F). T cells exposed to
TAPs had significantly increased apoptosis and, conversely, were less effective at inducing AT-3
tumor cell death compared to controls (Figure 1G–H). These data indicate that TAPs directly
impair T cell function and promote exhaustion. Taken together, these findings suggest that TAP-
mediated T cell suppression may facilitate tumor immune escape
Human T Cells Recapitulate Platelet-Mediated Dysfunction
To evaluate the translational relevance of our murine findings, we repeated the co-culture
experiments using human T cells from healthy donors. After activation, T cells were co-cultured
with MDA-MB-231-TCM alone, resting human platelets, or MDA-MB-231 TAPs (Figure 2A).
Similar to the murine data, TAPs significantly decreased expression of functional markers on
CD4⁺ and CD8+ effector T cells while resting platelets or TCM alone had no effect (Figure 2B–
C). Exhaustion markers PD-1 and PSGL-1 were significantly upregulated on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺
effector T cells in the presence of TAPs (Figure 2D–E). These results support that TAP can
suppress T cell function and induce exhaustion in both mouse and human systems, suggesting
their immunosuppressive role in a tumor setting.
Loss of P-Selectin Partially Restores T Cell Functionality and Reduces Exhaustion
Since platelets interact with T cells through the P-Selectin/PSGL-1 axis[60], we hypothesized
that P-Selectin is a key mediator of T cell dysfunction. Using platelets from P-Selectin knockout
mice (B6;129S2-Selptm1Hyn/J), we found that TAPs KO-P-Selectin did not express surface P-
Selectin yet displayed elevated PD-L1 levels compared to those from wildtype C57BL/6 mice
(Figure 3A-B). T cells co-cultured with TAPs KO-P-Selectin exhibited partially restored
expression of effector-associated markers in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ subsets compared to TAPs.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
(Figure 3C–D). Correspondingly, T cell exhaustion markers PD-1 and PSGL-1 were reduced in
KO co-cultures compared to T cells co-cultured with TAPs (Figure 3E–F), indicating that the
loss of P-Selectin mitigates T cell dysfunction. T cell cytotoxicity assays confirmed increased
AT-3 tumor cell killing, and reduced T cell death, when using T cells previously co-cultured
with TAPs KO-P-Selectin versus TAPs (Figure 3G–H). These results highlight a critical role for
P-Selectin in platelet-mediated T cell suppression, with its absence restoring partial immune
competence.
Crizanlizumab Blocks Platelet–T Cell Interaction and Preserves T cell Functionality
Given the central role of P-Selectin in platelet-mediated immune modulation and evidence that
P-Selectin KO mice exhibit reduced TNBC tumor growth and decreased regulatory T cell
infiltration [61], we next tested whether its pharmacological inhibition could reverse T cell
suppression with Crizanlizumab, an FDA-approved anti–P-Selectin antibody [62], significantly
reduced the formation of platelet–T cell aggregates in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells at 0.8 mg/mL,
a key interaction through which platelets suppress T cell effector function (Figure 4A-B) [63,
64]. Using the RB40.34 antibody, the murine equivalent to Crizanlizumab, we co-cultured T
cells with TAPs in the presence or absence of inhibitor. Both Crizanlizumab and RB40.34
preserved T cell functionality as assessed by preservation in effector-associated marker (Figure
4C–D) and prevented exhaustion marker upregulation (Figure 4E–F). Furthermore, inhibition of
P-Selectin during platelet co-culture restored some of the tumor cell–killing capacity of T cells,
as measured in cytotoxicity assays (Figure 4G–H). These findings demonstrate that
pharmacological blockade of P-Selectin can effectively protect T cells from platelet-induced
suppression.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Crizanlizumab Prevents T Cell Exhaustion Induced by Platelets from Patients with
Metastatic TNBC
TAPs have been implicated in immune suppression, but their effects in human cancer remain
unclear. In this experiment, we tested whether platelets derived from patients can suppress T
cells and whether this suppression can be reversed by P-selectin inhibition. To determine
whether the immunosuppressive role of tumor-activated platelets is conserved in human disease,
we evaluated the effects of platelets isolated directly from patients with metastatic triple-negative
breast cancer (mTNBC). T cells were isolated from a healthy donor, activated two days prior to
the experiment, and co-cultured for 48 hours with platelets from either a different sex-matched
healthy donor, mTNBC patients, or mTNBC platelets pre-treated with Crizanlizumab (Figure
5A). Strikingly, co-culture with mTNBC patient platelets led to a profound reduction in effector-
associated marker expression in both CD4⁺ and CD8+ effector T cells populations compared to
those T cells co-cultured with healthy donor platelets (Figure 5B&C). This confirms that TAPs
from patients are potent suppressors of T cell immunity. Notably, treatment with Crizanlizumab
during co-culture fully preserved effector functionality in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ subsets, restoring
levels comparable to those observed with healthy platelets.
Moreover, mTNBC platelets robustly induced exhaustion, as evidenced by increased co-
expression of PD-1 and TOX in both CD4+ effector T cells and CD8+ effector T cells (Figure
5D–E). However, in the presence of Crizanlizumab, this exhaustion phenotype was significantly
attenuated—demonstrating that P-Selectin inhibition is sufficient to block platelet-mediated
immunosuppression even when platelets are derived from patients with advanced cancer. This
strongly supports the therapeutic potential of targeting the P-Selectin/PSGL-1 axis to preserve T
cell functionality in mTNBC and potentially other cancers.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
P-Selectin inhibition enhances ICI response in TNBC tumors
Therefore, we evaluated RB40.34—the antibody used in the FDA approval process for
crizanlizumab [65] —for its ability to block P-selectin and impact tumor growth in vivo. We first
tested whether the combination of RB40.34 with anti-PD-1 would suppress tumor growth in
vivo. Mice injected with either AT-3 or EO771 murine TNBC cells that received RB40.34 + anti-
PD-1 had a significantly lower tumor volume than mice that received the monotherapies or sham
(Figure 6A, Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Flow cytometric analyses showed that mice that
receive RB40.34 + anti-PD-1 had significantly higher number of functionally active CD4+ and
CD8+ effector T cells found (Figure 6B) in the spleen. Consistently with what was found in the
in vitro experiments with Crizanlizumab, there was significantly decreased exhaustion found in
CD4+and CD8+ effector T cells in mice that received the combination or RB40.34 + anti-PD-1
(Figure 6C and Supplementary Figure 4A-B). We also identified pre-exhausted CD8+ and
CD4+ effector T cells in the spleens of the mice that received RB40.34 + anti-PD-1 treatment
(Supplementary Figure 4C-D) and differences in the spleens of the myeloid cell populations
which has previously been reported to also express PSGL-1[66] (Supplementary Figure 4E-F).
In addition to increase functional and decreased exhausted CD8+ and CD4+ effector T cells, we
also found a significant decrease in regulatory T cells in the spleens of mice that received the
combination therapy (Figure 6D). These results suggest that the combination therapy resulted in
enhanced effector phenotypes, reduced immunosuppressive cell types, and significantly
improved outcomes.
Results
underscore the need for precise strategies that selectively disrupt platelet-tumor
interactions without impairing normal platelet function. Moreover, platelet-derived factors,
including cytokines and growth factors, can influence T cell activation, potentially reshaping the
immune microenvironment and impacting immune responses [80]. Understanding these
mechanisms could inform novel therapeutic approaches that mitigate platelet-mediated
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
immunosuppression while preserving hemostatic balance, ultimately enhancing the efficacy of
immunotherapies in TNBC.
Although platelets are well recognized for their role in driving tumor growth, our findings
provide direct patient-derived evidence that they can also function as potent modulators of
adaptive immunity [71]. Importantly, by using healthy donor T cells, we demonstrate that
platelets isolated from mTNBC patients can directly induce T cell exhaustion independent of
tumor cells, underscoring the novel concept that TAPs alone are sufficient to drive this
dysfunctional phenotype. Notably, platelets from TNBC patients exhibit upregulation of
immunomodulatory molecules, including P-selectin and PD-L1, which likely mediate this
suppressive effect [81]. Beyond illuminating immune suppression mechanisms, our study
addresses the critical need for predictive biomarkers of ICI response in TNBC. Existing
biomarkers—such as PD-L1 expression or tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density—have
limited sensitivity in stratifying responders [82-85]. Given their immunoregulatory role, TAP-
derived proteins, platelet-expressed PD-L1, and P-selectin expression profiles may offer
accessible, blood-based biomarkers for monitoring immunotherapy responsiveness [71, 86-88].
These data reveal that TAPs are not passive bystanders but active immune regulators
capable of undermining anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, given that ICIs targeting PD-L1 could
also alter platelet phenotype and function, platelet–T cell interactions may represent an
underappreciated variable influencing therapeutic efficacy. Understanding and disrupting this
platelet-driven immune suppression could open new avenues for restoring robust T cell
responses while maintaining normal platelet function in cancer patients.
Despite these insights, several limitations warrant consideration. Although our in vitro
TCM models do not replicate the full complexity of the tumor microenvironment, where platelet
activation is shaped by multiple systemic and local factors, these experiments show that tumor-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
derived signals alone can activate platelets and suppress effector T cells in the circulation.
Nevertheless, our in vitro data, demonstrated that the blockade of P-selection in combination of
anti-PD-1 significantly reduced the tumor burden in different preclinical TNBC models (Figure
6A). While our findings indicate that P-Selectin inhibition can restore T cell function in TNBC,
the efficacy of this strategy in other cancer types remains unknown. Additional studies are
required to determine whether targeting platelet–T cell interactions could serve as a broadly
effective immunotherapeutic strategy across multiple cancer types. Further investigation is also
needed to dissect how platelets and T cells interact within the human tumor microenvironment,
including the roles of cytokines, integrins, and growth factors. Elucidating these pathways may
enable strategies that selectively disrupt platelet-driven immunosuppression while preserving
hemostatic balance. Together, these findings position platelets as active regulators of anti-tumor
immunity in TNBC and as promising targets for enhancing immunotherapy efficacy.
1. Obeagu, E.I. and G.U. Obeagu, Breast cancer: A review of risk factors and diagnosis.
Medicine, 2024. 103(3): p. e36905.
2. Schaubaecher, J.B., et al., Procoagulant platelets promote immune evasion in triple-
negative breast cancer. Blood, 2024. 144(2): p. 216-226.
3. Hwang, K.-T., et al., Impact of breast cancer subtypes on prognosis of women with
operable invasive breast cancer: a population-based study using SEER database. Clinical
Cancer Research, 2019. 25(6): p. 1970-1979.
4. Chen, D.S. and I. Mellman, Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer–immune set
point. Nature, 2017. 541(7637): p. 321-330.
5. Clark, D.P., Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: the importance of tumor
topography and the challenges to cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathology, 2018. 126(1): p.
11-19.
6. Tsai, M.-J., et al., Tumor microenvironment: a new treatment target for cancer.
International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014. 2014(1): p. 351959.
7. Deepak, K.G.K., et al., Tumor microenvironment: Challenges and opportunities in
targeting metastasis of triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Res, 2020. 153: p.
104683.
8. Jacob, S.L., L.A. Huppert, and H.S. Rugo, Role of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer. JCO
Oncol Pract, 2023. 19(4): p. 167-179.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
9. Debien, V ., et al., Immunotherapy in breast cancer: an overview of current strategies and
perspectives. npj Breast Cancer, 2023. 9(1): p. 7.
10. Rebaudi, F., et al., The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel
Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2024. 130.
11. Heater, N.K., S. Warrior, and J. Lu, Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer.
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 2024. 17(1): p. 131.
12. Darvin, P., et al., Immune checkpoint inhibitors: recent progress and potential
biomarkers. Experimental & molecular medicine, 2018. 50(12): p. 1-11.
13. Pardoll, D.M., The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature
reviews cancer, 2012. 12(4): p. 252-264.
14. Xu, J., et al., Analysis of Immune Resistance Mechanisms in TNBC: Dual Effects Inside
and Outside the Tumor. Clinical Breast Cancer, 2024. 24(2): p. e91-e102.
15. Essalihi, A., et al., Immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: current trends and
future prospects. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. 37(1): p. 51.
16. Onagi, H., et al., High platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in triple-negative breast cancer
associates with immunosuppressive status of TILs. Breast Cancer Res, 2022. 24(1): p. 67.
17. Escopy, S. and E.L. Chaikof, Targeting the P-selectin/PSGL-1 pathway: discovery of
disease-modifying therapeutics for disorders of thromboinflammation. Blood Vessels,
Thrombosis & Hemostasis, 2024. 1(3): p. 100015.
18. Kappelmayer, J. and B. Nagy, Jr., The Interaction of Selectins and PSGL-1 as a Key
Component in Thrombus Formation and Cancer Progression. Biomed Res Int, 2017.
2017: p. 6138145.
19. Li, C., et al., Crosstalk between Platelets and the Immune System: Old Systems with New
Discoveries. Adv Hematol, 2012. 2012: p. 384685.
20. Liu, S., et al., Elevated Platelet Count Predicts Poor Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients
with Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis. Cancer Manag Res, 2020. 12: p. 6069-
6075.
21. Giannakeas, V ., Trends in platelet count among cancer patients. Exp Hematol Oncol,
2022. 11(1): p. 16.
22. Kuznetsov, H.S., et al., Identification of luminal breast cancers that establish a tumor-
supportive macroenvironment defined by proangiogenic platelets and bone marrow-
derived cells. Cancer Discov, 2012. 2(12): p. 1150-65.
23. Battinelli, E.M., B.A. Markens, and J.E. Italiano, Jr., Release of angiogenesis regulatory
proteins from platelet alpha granules: modulation of physiologic and pathologic
angiogenesis. Blood, 2011. 118(5): p. 1359-69.
24. Guo, Q., et al., Platelets upregulate tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 in an
epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent manner in vitro. Blood Adv, 2022. 6(20): p.
5668-5675.
25. Johnson, K.E., et al., Aspirin inhibits platelets from reprogramming breast tumor cells
and promoting metastasis. Blood Adv, 2019. 3(2): p. 198-211.
26. Zhou, L., et al., The critical role of platelet in cancer progression and metastasis.
European Journal of Medical Research, 2023. 28(1): p. 385.
27. Liao, K., et al., The role of platelets in the regulation of tumor growth and metastasis: the
mechanisms and targeted therapy. MedComm (2020), 2023. 4(5): p. e350.
28. Hinterleitner, C., et al., Platelet PD-L1 reflects collective intratumoral PD-L1 expression
and predicts immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun, 2021.
12(1): p. 7005.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
29. Stenberg, P.E., et al., A platelet alpha-granule membrane protein (GMP-140) is expressed
on the plasma membrane after activation. J Cell Biol, 1985. 101(3): p. 880-6.
30. Gotsch, U., et al., Expression of P-selectin on endothelial cells is upregulated by LPS and
TNF-alpha in vivo. Cell Adhes Commun, 1994. 2(1): p. 7-14.
31. Yang, J., et al., Targeted gene disruption demonstrates that P-selectin glycoprotein ligand
1 (PSGL-1) is required for P-selectin-mediated but not E-selectin-mediated neutrophil
rolling and migration. J Exp Med, 1999. 190(12): p. 1769-82.
32. Qi, C., et al., P-selectin-mediated platelet adhesion promotes tumor growth. Oncotarget,
2015. 6(9): p. 6584-96.
33. Petry, J., et al., 1,8-Cineole inhibits platelet-leukocyte aggregate formation by reducing
P-selectin expression. Front Pharmacol, 2025. 16: p. 1546157.
34. Merten, M., et al., Sulfatides activate platelets through P-selectin and enhance platelet
and platelet-leukocyte aggregation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2005. 25(1): p. 258-
63.
35. Kim, Y .J., et al., P-selectin deficiency attenuates tumor growth and metastasis. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A, 1998. 95(16): p. 9325-30.
36. Coupland, L.A., B.H. Chong, and C.R. Parish, Platelets and P-selectin control tumor cell
metastasis in an organ-specific manner and independently of NK cells. Cancer Res, 2012.
72(18): p. 4662-71.
37. Ferber, S., et al., Co-targeting the tumor endothelium and P-selectin-expressing
glioblastoma cells leads to a remarkable therapeutic outcome. Elife, 2017. 6.
38. Shamay, Y ., et al., Assessing the therapeutic efficacy of VEGFR-1-targeted polymer drug
conjugates in mouse tumor models. Journal of Controlled Release, 2016. 229: p. 192-199.
39. Farhood, B., M. Najafi, and K. Mortezaee, CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes in cancer
immunotherapy: A review. J Cell Physiol, 2019. 234(6): p. 8509-8521.
40. Constant, S.L. and K. Bottomly, Induction of Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T cell responses: the
alternative approaches. Annu Rev Immunol, 1997. 15: p. 297-322.
41. Zhu, J., H. Yamane, and W.E. Paul, Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*).
Annu Rev Immunol, 2010. 28: p. 445-89.
42. Zhu, L., et al., Platelets provoke distinct dynamics of immune responses by differentially
regulating CD4+ T-cell proliferation. J Thromb Haemost, 2014. 12(7): p. 1156-65.
43. Haribhai, D., et al., TGF-β1 along with other platelet contents augments Treg cells to
suppress anti-FVIII immune responses in hemophilia A mice. Blood Adv, 2016. 1(2): p.
139-151.
44. Tinoco, R., et al., PSGL-1: A New Player in the Immune Checkpoint Landscape. Trends
Immunol, 2017. 38(5): p. 323-335.
45. Blair, H.A., Crizanlizumab: First Approval. Drugs, 2020. 80(1): p. 79-84.
46. Ataga, K.I., et al., Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease.
N Engl J Med, 2017. 376(5): p. 429-439.
47. Donegan, W.L. and P.N. Redlich, BREAST CANCER IN MEN. Surgical Clinics of North
America, 1996. 76(2): p. 343-363.
48. Tomayko, M.M. and C.P . Reynolds, Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in
athymic (nude) mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1989. 24(3): p. 148-54.
49. Smith, M.R., et al., Targeting NTRK1 Enhances Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in
NTRK1 Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Res, 2024. 84(23): p. 4002-4016.
50. Johnson, K.E., et al., Tamoxifen Directly Inhibits Platelet Angiogenic Potential and
Platelet-Mediated Metastasis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2017. 37(4): p. 664-674.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
51. Kouo, T., et al., Galectin-3 Shapes Antitumor Immune Responses by Suppressing CD8+ T
Cells via LAG-3 and Inhibiting Expansion of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells. Cancer
Immunol Res, 2015. 3(4): p. 412-23.
52. Huang, Y .-H., et al., CEACAM1 regulates TIM-3-mediated tolerance and exhaustion.
Nature, 2015. 517(7534): p. 386-390.
53. Vandenborre, K., et al., Interaction of CTLA-4 (CD152) with CD80 or CD86 inhibits
human T-cell activation. Immunology, 1999. 98(3): p. 413-21.
54. Tsai, S. and P. Santamaria, MHC Class II Polymorphisms, Autoreactive T-Cells, and
Autoimmunity. Front Immunol, 2013. 4: p. 321.
55. Han, Y ., D. Liu, and L. Li, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer. Am J
Cancer Res, 2020. 10(3): p. 727-742.
56. Yang, R., et al., Galectin-9 interacts with PD-1 and TIM-3 to regulate T cell death and is
a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Communications, 2021. 12(1): p. 832.
57. Liu, Y ., et al., Platelet-mediated tumor metastasis mechanism and the role of cell
adhesion molecules. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2021. 167: p. 103502.
58. Janiszewska, M., M.C. Primi, and T. Izard, Cell adhesion in cancer: Beyond the
migration of single cells. J Biol Chem, 2020. 295(8): p. 2495-2505.
59. Yeini, E. and R. Satchi-Fainaro, The role of P-selectin in cancer-associated thrombosis
and beyond. Thrombosis Research, 2022. 213: p. S22-S28.
60. McEver, R.P . and R.D. Cummings, Role of PSGL-1 binding to selectins in leukocyte
recruitment. J Clin Invest, 1997. 100(11 Suppl): p. S97-103.
61. Nasti, T.H., D.C. Bullard, and N. Yusuf, P-selectin enhances growth and metastasis of
mouse mammary tumors by promoting regulatory T cell infiltration into the tumors. Life
Sci, 2015. 131: p. 11-8.
62. Karki, N.R. and A. Kutlar, P-Selectin Blockade in the Treatment of Painful Vaso-
Occlusive Crises in Sickle Cell Disease: A Spotlight on Crizanlizumab. J Pain Res, 2021.
14: p. 849-856.
63. Wu, F., et al., Increased platelet-CD8+ T-cell aggregates displaying high activation,
exhaustion, and tendency to death correlate with disease progression in people with HIV-
1. J Leukoc Biol, 2024. 116(1): p. 166-176.
64. Dai, X.P., et al., Increased Platelet-CD4(+) T Cell Aggregates Are Correlated With HIV-1
Permissiveness and CD4(+) T Cell Loss. Front Immunol, 2021. 12: p. 799124.
65. Leung, K., Microbubbles coated with anti-P-selectin antibody RB40.34. Molecular
Imaging and Contrast Agent Database, 2006.
66. Laszik, Z., et al., P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 is broadly expressed in cells of
myeloid, lymphoid, and dendritic lineage and in some nonhematopoietic cells. Blood,
1996. 88(8): p. 3010-21.
67. Gan, J., X. Zhang, and J. Guo, The role of platelets in tumor immune evasion and
metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Cancer Cell Int, 2025. 25(1): p.
258.
68. Tuerhong, N., et al., Interactions between platelets and the cancer immune
microenvironment. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2024. 199: p. 104380.
69. Ciavattone, N.G., et al., Evaluating immunotherapeutic outcomes in triple-negative
breast cancer with a cholesterol radiotracer in mice. JCI Insight, 2024. 9(8).
70. Hou, Y ., et al., Platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis: Novel mechanisms of fibrinogen-
independent platelet aggregation and fibronectin-mediated protein wave of hemostasis. J
Biomed Res, 2015. 29(6): p. 437-44.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
71. Morales-Pacheco, M., et al., The role of platelets in cancer: from their influence on tumor
progression to their potential use in liquid biopsy. Biomarker Research, 2025. 13(1): p.
27.
72. Gautam, D., et al., Platelets and circulating (tumor) cells: partners in promoting
metastatic cancer. Curr Opin Hematol, 2025. 32(1): p. 52-60.
73. Revelle, B.M., et al., Structure-function analysis of P-selectin-sialyl LewisX binding
interactions. Mutagenic alteration of ligand binding specificity. J Biol Chem, 1996.
271(8): p. 4289-97.
74. Stevens, D.L., M. Hix, and B.L. Gildon, Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Vaso-
Occlusive Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. J Pharm Technol, 2021. 37(4): p. 209-215.
75. Chu, T., et al., Precursors of exhausted T cells are pre-emptively formed in acute
infection. Nature, 2025. 640(8059): p. 782-792.
76. Wu, Z., et al., CD83 expression characterizes precursor exhausted T cell population.
Communications Biology, 2023. 6(1): p. 258.
77. Beltra, J.C., et al., Developmental Relationships of Four Exhausted CD8(+) T Cell
Subsets Reveals Underlying Transcriptional and Epigenetic Landscape Control
Mechanisms. Immunity, 2020. 52(5): p. 825-841.e8.
78. Utzschneider, D.T., et al., Early precursor T cells establish and propagate T cell
exhaustion in chronic infection. Nature Immunology, 2020. 21(10): p. 1256-1266.
79. Chen, Z., et al., TCF-1-Centered Transcriptional Network Drives an Effector versus
Exhausted CD8 T Cell-Fate Decision. Immunity, 2019. 51(5): p. 840-855.e5.
80. Yang, J., et al., Aspirin prevents metastasis by limiting platelet TXA2 suppression of T cell
immunity. Nature, 2025.
81. Kasperska-Zajac, A., Z. Brzoza, and B. Rogala, Effect of allergen-specific
immunotherapy on platelet secretory activity in patients with grass-pollen allergy.
Vaccine, 2006. 24(47-48): p. 6990-3.
82. Presti, D., et al., Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a predictive biomarker of
response to checkpoint blockers in solid tumors: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol
Hematol, 2022. 177: p. 103773.
83. Valenza, C., et al., Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes across Breast Cancer Subtypes:
Current Issues for Biomarker Assessment. Cancers (Basel), 2023. 15(3).
84. Grossman, J.E., et al., Is PD-L1 a consistent biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy? The
model of balstilimab in a virally-driven tumor. Oncogene, 2021. 40(8): p. 1393-1395.
85. Zdrenka, M., et al., Diagnostic biopsy does not accurately reflect the PD-L1 expression in
triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Exp Med, 2023. 23(8): p. 5121-5127.
86. Wang, L., et al., Emerging roles of platelets in cancer biology and their potential as
therapeutic targets. Front Oncol, 2022. 12: p. 939089.
87. Bravaccini, S., et al., The use of platelets as a clinical tool in oncology: opportunities and
challenges. Cancer Letters, 2024. 607: p. 217044.
88. Razzaghi, H., et al., Emerging Role of Tumor-Educated Platelets as a New Liquid Biopsy
Tool for Colorectal Cancer. Arch Iran Med, 2023. 26(8): p. 447-454.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
.
Figure 6. Reduced P-selectin levels increase response to ICI in tumor cells. A) Tumor
volume measurements of mice injected with either AT-3or EO771 that received combination of
RB40.34 and anti-PD-1. Flow cytometry measured functionally active B) CD4+, and CD8+
effector T cells co-cultured with RB40.34 and anti-PD-1, exhaustion in C) CD4+and
CD8+effector T cells co-cultured with RB40.34, and D) T-regulatory cells. *, P < 0.05; **, P <
0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 5. Retained functionality in human CD4+and CD8+Effector exhausted by TCM-
platelets through introduction of Crizanlizumab. A) Schematic of isolation and T cells co-
cultured with platelets from health and Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) donor
experiment. Flow cytometry used to quantify functionality of B) CD4+ and C) CD8+ effector T
cells and exhaustion of D) CD4+ and E) CD8+effector T cells in TNBC co-culture with
Crizanlizumab. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 17, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675650doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 4. T cell function preserved with blocked platelet- T cell interaction through