Resolving Sialylated N-Glycans and Immune Cell Landscapes Using a Unified Same-Section IMC–MSI Workflow

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Full text 1,838 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Integrating antibody-based imaging with mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) on the same formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue section offers powerful opportunities for multimodal spatial analysis but remains analytically challenging due to cross-platform chemical and physical interference. In particular, chemically aggressive on-tissue derivatization strategies required for isomer-resolved glycan MSI may compromise downstream antibody detection. Here, we systematically evaluate the analytical compatibility and acquisition order of imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and sialic-acid-linkage-resolving N-glycan MALDI-MSI using an Amidation–Activation–X-Linkage (AAXL) derivatization strategy on the same FFPE tissue section. Two same-section workflows were compared: AAXL–MALDI MSI followed by IMC (MALDI-first) and IMC followed by AAXL–MALDI MSI (IMC-first). We find that AAXL-first processing results in severe and widespread loss of IMC anti-body signal across epithelial, immune, and nuclear markers, rendering subsequent antibody-based analysis unreliable. In contrast, IMC-first acquisition preserves quantitative antibody performance while maintaining spatial glycan distributions, relative abundance structure, and isomer-specific signal integrity in downstream AAXL–MALDI MSI. Using high-precision co-registration, we further demonstrate that IMC-first sequencing enables analytically robust integration of IMC and MSI data at both domain and pixel levels. These results establish IMC-first acquisition as the preferred same-section strategy for workflows combining antibody imaging with chemically intensive, isomer-resolved glycan MSI and provide generalizable guidance for the design of multimodal spatial mass spectrometry experiments. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0