Pitfalls in understanding how multiple long-term conditions cluster: whole population and age-stratified associations in 7,490,874 people in England

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29 ⓘ

This analysis of 7.5 million English adults reveals that age and sex stratification significantly alters the identification of multiple long-term condition clusters, challenging current reproducibility standards in multimorbidity research.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Studies of how multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) cluster together in individuals vary in the populations studied, and whether they age and/or sex stratify, which limits comparison between studies and reproducibility. This study uses a large, UK primary-care dataset to examine how pairwise strength of association between 74 conditions varies by age in both men and women aged 30-99 years, and to explore implications for MLT cluster analyses. Joint prevalence of conditions was lowest in younger age-groups and progressively increased with age, whereas Association Beyond Chance (ABC) was highest in younger age-groups and progressively decreased with age. Condition clustering based on ABC identified different clusters in all men and all women aged 30-99 years, and these clusters differed from those identified in each age-group. Researchers examining how MLTC cluster should consider whether age and sex stratification is appropriate given their study aims and/or would improve comparability and reproducibility, and explicitly justify their choices.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC