Teleport-Stabilized Quantum-Walk Transport for Robust Neoantigen Ranking in Near-Tie Regimes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 2,166 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Personalized neoantigen vaccination is a patient-specific decision problem: given a tumor’s molecular signature—somatic mutations, clonality, RNA expression, and antigen-processing context—we must choose a small, manufacturable peptide set that stays therapeutically relevant under uncertainty. In late-stage pipelines, candidates often collapse into near-ties: binding/presentation estimates, immunogenicity surrogates, and structure-based refinement compress many peptides into narrow score bands, making the final top-K fragile to small shifts in calibration, scaling, sampling, or docking protocols. Similar instability arises in peptide–target discovery when multiple hypotheses remain comparably supported. We introduce a transport-stabilized ranking layer that prioritizes redundancy structure over marginal score differences. Peptides (and structural microstates) become nodes in a patient-conditioned evidence graph; edges encode evidence overlap (motifs/HLA restrictions, processing features, target neighborhoods, pocket/contact fingerprints). We apply symmetry-aware quotient reduction of a normalized graph operator, collapsing near-symmetric neighborhoods into basin units while preserving effective shortlist couplings. Discriminative basin fingerprints are then extracted using coherent quantum-walk transport, ∣ψ(t)⟩ = e―iHt∣ψ(0)⟩, with visitation P(v,t) = ∣⟨v∣ψ(t)⟩∣2. Because coherent dynamics are oscillatory and horizon-dependent, we introduce a teleport-consensus channel that mixes unitary transport with restart to yield a stationary marginal suitable for stable ranking, ρt+1 = (1 ― α)UρtU† + α Σjvj∣j⟩⟨j∣, and πi = Tr(Πiρ). Information-theoretic polygraphs—entropy, dispersion, and consensus traces—quantify stabilization and provide an interpretable tie-breaking audit trail. We demonstrate consistent stabilization across colorectal-cancer contexts spanning peptide–target mechanistic triage, microstate symmetry auditing, multimodal evidence fusion, docking-ensemble geometrization, and patient-specific neoantigen shortlist construction. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0