NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the graphite felt as the negative electrode of vanadium redox flow batteries

NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the graphite felt as the negative electrode of vanadium redox flow batteries | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the graphite felt as the negative electrode of vanadium redox flow batteries Wen-Fei Liu, Kue-Ho Kim, Hyo-Jin Ahn This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Mar, 2024 Read the published version in Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering → Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) are prospective energy storage medium owing to their flexible design and long lifetime. However, the problem of sluggish negative electrode dynamics of VRFBs has become a great resistance to their large-scale commercial applications. To solve this problem, we employed a facile and cost-effective approach to synthesize NiO/rGO composites using hydrothermal and calcination processes. The NiO/rGO nanocatalysts were evenly applied onto the heat-treated graphite felt (HGF) to prepare a high-performance negative electrode for VRFBs. This coating process was achieved using an ultrasonic spraying system, resulting in NiO/rGO-HGF. The NiO/rGO electrocatalysts provided enhanced adsorption characteristics of vanadium ions and sufficient redox-reactive sites, which improved electrochemical performance (9.41% higher energy efficiency of NiO/rGO-HGF compared with HGF at 160 mA cm − 2 ) and high cycle stability (84.7% electrolyte capacity after 100 cycles) of the VRFB cells. In conclusion, our work with the NiO/rGO-HGF anode represents a promising direction for the development of highly efficient and stable VRFB anodes for broadening commercial applications. Vanadium redox flow batteries Negative electrode Graphite felt Reduced graphene oxide Nickel oxide Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 1. Introduction With decreasing fossil fuel reserves and the growing environmental crisis, the global challenge lies in advancing the renewable energy sources, including wind and solar power. [ 1 – 3 ]. Accordingly, separated energy storage systems have been adopted to compensate the disadvantages of renewable power generators such as instability and intermittency during the operation. After the pioneering work of Skyllas-Kazacos research group, the vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) have known for their various benefits, including long-term cyclability and low levelized cost of energy. VRFBs utilize same electrochemical reaction species (vanadium) in both electrodes at the different valence states, which strategy effectively mitigates the risks associated with cross-contamination [ 4 ]. The electrode takes crucial part for the VRFB and serves as a locus for redox reactions. Its efficiency directly governs the power density and the energy-conversion efficiency of the VRFB. Graphite felt (GF) is the prevalent choice for VRFB electrodes, owing to its corrosion-resistant three-dimensional porous structure and cost-effectiveness. However, the utilization of pristine GF as the negative electrode in VRFBs introduces challenges, including suboptimal hydrophilicity, insufficient active sites, and pronounced side reactions leading to hydrogen precipitation. To improve the energy storage capability of VRFBs and improve commercial viability, researchers have redirected their efforts toward augmenting the surface characteristics of electrodes. For example, to increase the effective active sites during the charge and discharge, thermal activation [ 5 ], acid treatment [ 6 ], water activation [ 7 ], plasma treatment [ 8 ], electrochemical oxidation treatment [ 9 ] and microwave treatment [ 10 ] are used to modify the surface functional groups of electrodes. Modification with carbonaceous materials, such as carbon nanoparticles [ 11 ], carbon spheres [ 12 ], carbon flakes [ 13 ], carbon nanotubes [ 14 ], graphene [ 15 ], and graphene oxide [ 16 ], increases the electrochemical active sites and provides accelerated electrical conductivity. Furthermore, some inexpensive metal oxides (including TiO 2 [ 17 ], Mn 3 O 4 [ 18 ], WO 3 [ 19 ], CeO 2 [ 20 ], and PbO 2 [ 21 ]) have been used as catalysts to provide more reactive sites and increase the hydrophilicity of the GF. Yun et al. [ 22 ] synthesized NiO nanocatalysts on GF surfaces via distributed thermal decomposition. In this study, nickel ions modified the oxygen-related surface functional groups by substituting H + to the hydroxyl groups. Moreover, the negatively charged NiO nanoparticles also showed good vanadium ions adsorption, which effectively improved the energy storage capability. However, the agglomeration and uneven distribution of nanoparticles on the electrode remain a challenge. Furthermore, these nanoparticles are often detached from the substrate during VRFB cycling, degrading the cycle stability. Thus, the uniform anchoring of metal oxide particles is a crucial technique for improving the efficiency and stability of VRFB. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO), on the other hand, boasts a two-dimensional layered structure with an expansive active specific surface area [ 23 ]. When employed as a carrier for NiO, it effectively mitigates the intrinsic low electrical conductivity associated with metal oxides [ 24 ]. Additionally, rGO provides an abundance of anchoring sites for NiO, ensuring a uniform distribution and preventing the agglomeration of NiO nanoparticles. Furthermore, during battery cycling, the nanoparticles adhered securely to the electrode surface. The synergistic effect of the NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the GF electrode has not been investigated in detail for VRFB applications. In this study, an NiO/rGO composite structure was successfully fabricated using a hydrothermal method. The prepared NiO/rGO nanocatalysts were then uniformly coated on the surface of HGF by ultrasonic spraying system. Because rGO with a high electrical conductivity provided anchor sites for NiO, the NiO nanoparticles were well distributed on the rGO surface and did not easily agglomerate. Introducing NiO nanoparticles into rGO provided abundant catalytically active sites and improved its charge transfer capability. This strategy was applied to a VRFB anode that exhibited high catalytic activity and excellent cycling stability. 2. Experimental To remove impurities at the surface, graphite felt (GF, 4.2 mm thickness, Sinopro) was repeatedly cleaned with deionized water (DI water) and ethanol. After drying, the felt was heated in a 500°C oven using air atmosphere for 10 h to activate the surface of GF (thereafter referred to as HGF). NiO-decorated rGO was successfully fabricated via a hydrothermal method and following calcination process. The 15 min ultrasonic process was used to disperse the 0.05 g) into 10 ml of DI water. Then, 30 ml of 2mM nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl 2 ·6H 2 O, SAMCHUN) and 2 mM urea (CH 4 N 2 O, Aldrich) solution were homogeneously mixed with rGO solution after stirring for 3 h. As shown in Fig. 1 , the resulting precursor was then poured to a 50 mL reaction chamber, to progress the hydrothermal reaction for 6 h under 180°C. The precipitates were then centrifuged several times with ethyl alcohol and DI water to eliminate the residual reactants. The resulting product was dried at 80 ℃. Then, the resultant sample was heat treated at 400°C for 3 h using N 2 gas to synthesize NiO/rGO powder. The dispersion solution of the sample, containing 0.5 wt% NiO/rGO and 0.1 wt% CMC dissolved in DI water was uniformly sprayed onto the HGF surface using an ultrasonic spray-coating system. For ultrasonic spray coating, the suspension feed rate, frequency, spray time, hot plate temperature and distance between nozzle and HGF were set to 4 mL/h, 130 kHz, 5 min, 100°C and 25 cm, respectively. Furthermore, rGO-HGF was prepared using the same procedure to confirm the role of NiO layer. The surface morphology was characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted to investigate the crystalline phases and verify the chemical bonding states. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements with cyclic voltammetry (CV) were executed utilizing an AUTOLAB instrumentation platform, under a fixed voltage range from − 0.8 V to 0 V. During the electrochemical characteristic evaluation, 0.15 M V 3+ electrolyte with three-electrode measurement system at a scan rate of 5 mV s − 1 . The prepared felts, Ag/AgCl, and Pt electrodes were served as working, reference, and counter electrodes, respectively. A VRFB full-cell was introduced to evaluate the practical energy storage performance at the voltage range from 0.7 to 1.6 V. NiO/rGO-HGF and HGF were utilized as the negative and positive electrode to construct full-cell measurement system. Rectangular samples with dimensions of 20 × 30 mm were cut from pristine HGF and used as the cathode side in the VRFB tests. For comparison, the anode side was tested successively with HGF, rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF samples. For the electrolyte, the 1.5 M V 3+ (20 mL) with 3.0M H 2 SO 4 solvent and 1.5 M V 4+ (20 mL) with 3.0M H 2 SO 4 solvent was adopted for the negative and positive part, respectively. Energy storage performance was investigated at current densities of 40, 80, 120, and 160 mA cm − 2 and a rapid cycling test was carried out at a current density of 160 mA cm − 2 for 100 cycles. 3. Results and Discussion Figure 2 appears the morphologies of the HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF felt. As demonstrated in previous research and shown in Fig. 2 (a, d), HGF showed a smooth surface. In contrast, the surfaces of rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF treated by ultrasonic spraying exhibited rough surface morphologies. Specifically, Fig. 2 (b, e) show the 2D lamellar structure of rGO, which uniformly envelops the HGF surface. This phenomenon is contributed by the van der Waals gravitational force, which causes rGO to curl and fold [ 25 ]. The increased specific surface area of rGO facilitated interfacial interactions between the electrode and the vanadium electrolyte solution. In Fig. 2 (c) and (f), uniform decoration of small-sized NiO nanoparticles was observed on the rGO layer. This was a consequence of the defect sites in rGO, which provided favorable locations for the generation of NiO nanoparticles [ 26 ]. Additionally, in Fig. 2 (g), we present EDS elemental mapping of the NiO/rGO-HGF sample. These results clearly demonstrated the uniform elemental distribution on the electrode surface. The rGO and NiO/rGO powder XRD spectra are shown in Fig. 3 . For the rGO samples, the peak at ~ 25.74° was detected, regarding the graphite (002) structures [ 27 , 28 ]. The NiO/rGO sample shows slightly decreased graphite peaks at approximately 29.1°, together with additional peaks at 37.1°, 43.1°, 62.9°, and 75.04°. These observations correspond to the diffraction peaks of NiO, implying that the crystallographic planes are indexed as (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) [ 29 ]. This confirms that the hydrothermal synthesis and subsequent thermal treatment successfully produced the NiO/rGO composite structure. XPS was performed on the NiO/rGO sample to investigate its chemical bonding structure. In Fig. 4 (a), the binding energy exhibits a primary peak along with satellite peaks at ~ 854.8 eV and ~ 861.2 eV, corresponding to the Ni 2p 3/2 spin-orbit energy levels. At the same time, the Ni 2p 1/2 spin-orbit energy level of nickel oxide is corresponding to the main peak at ~ 872.6 eV and the satellite peak at ~ 879.4 eV, which supports the predominance of Ni in the + 2 valence state [ 30 ]. Figure 4 (b) presents the fitted XPS data for the C 1s region, including three distinguishable peaks. These peaks are located at ~ 284.5 eV, ~ 286.2 eV, and ~ 288.0 eV respectively, corresponding to the binding energies of C–C, C–O and O–C = O at the 1s electron level. Notably, the successful reduction of GO to rGO during heat treatment is indicated by the weaker peaks of the C–O and O–C = O peaks than those of C–C [ 31 ]. Figure 4 (c) shows the XPS spectrum of the O 1s region, that indicates the existence of O-containing functional groups within the NiO-rGO composite. Among these peaks, the characteristic peak at ~ 529.3 eV and ~ 529.5 eV corresponds to general metal oxide bonding, including the C–O–Ni and Ni-O bonds [ 32 ]. Generally, nickel forms bonds with the oxygen-containing functional groups or carbon atoms in rGO. However, NiO-rGO sample showed no characteristic peak at ~ 283.5 eV (indicative of Ni–C) in the C1s spectrum, suggesting that NiO interacts with rGO primarily through C–O–Ni bonds [ 33 ]. In addition, the characteristic peak at ~ 531.1 eV corresponds to C = O bonds, and the peak at ~ 532.9 eV corresponds to C–OH bonds [ 34 ]. Figure 5 (a) shows the high contact angle of 131.7° obtained for the HGF electrode, indicating poor hydrophilicity and low electrolyte wettability. In contrast, when V 3+ electrolyte was dropped onto the surfaces of rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF (Fig. 5 b, c), the droplets were rapidly absorbed. This observation demonstrated the high hydrophilicity of the rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF electrodes. The increased hydrophilicity was owing to the substantial incorporation of oxygen related surface functional groups into the NiO/rGO catalyst. These incorporated functional groups promote more favorable electrolyte wetting process, thereby accelerating the diffusion of the V 3+ electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to examine the effects of rGO and NiO/rGO on the V 3+ /V 2+ reaction kinetics. Figure 6 (a) and Table (1) show CV plots of HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF for the V 3+ /V 2+ redox pair containing 0.15 M V 3+ +3 M H 2 SO 4 at a scan rate of 5 mV s − 1 . Notably, compared with pristine HGFs, HGFs treated with rGO and NiO/rGO layers showed reduced peak separation and increased peak current values. Thus, the rGO and NiO/rGO exhibit favorable reversibility and electrochemical activity as catalysts for V 3+ /V 2+ redox reactions. EIS was performed systematically on all electrodes to validate this conclusion. EIS is a valuable and indispensable technique for probing the kinetic properties at the surface of electrode during the electrochemical reactions. In Fig. 6 (b), the negative Nyquist plots for different graphite felts are presented, where the diameters of the semicircles are inversely correlated with the charge transfer resistance (R ct ) [ 35 , 36 ]. Notably, HGFs with the rGO and the NiO/rGO layer was showed significantly lower R ct than that of the pristine HGF, which also supports the CV results. Therefore, based on the EIS and CV data, the effect of NiO/rGO functional layer on the graphite felt was confirmed, which improved the catalytic activity of the HGFs during the vanadium redox reactions. For evaluating the electrochemical activity and stability of the electrodes, we performed negative cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests with varying scan rates from 1 to 10 mV s − 1 . The results are displayed in Figs. 7 (a) and (b). It is noteworthy that the NiO/rGO-HGFs consistently exhibited improved peak current values at all scan rates. This suggests that the stability and reversibility of HGF are inferior to those of NiO/rGO-HGF [ 37 ]. Figure 8 (a) shows the galvanostatic charge/discharge data with HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF electrodes at a current density of 120 mA cm − 2 . Interestingly, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode VRFB had an increased discharge and a reduced charge plateau. This indicates that NiO/rGO-HGF effectively mitigates electrochemical polarization, thereby improving the overall battery performance. For demonstrating the performance of the VRFB with the NiO/rGO-HGF anode, single-cell experiments were conducted at various applied current densities, as exhibited in Fig. 8 (b-d). These figures show energy efficiency (EE), coulombic efficiency (CE) and voltage efficiency (VE) data for current densities from 40 to 160 mA cm − 2 . The VE improved owing to the increased vanadium ion penetration rate according to the current increment [ 38 ]. Nonetheless, the simultaneous rise in current density results in an accelerated charge and discharge rate, which in turn leads to an increased overpotential and reduces both EE and VE [ 39 ]. Because VE is closely correlated with the overpotential, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode consistently exhibited a higher VE compared to pure HGF at various current densities. This suggests that the NiO/rGO layer as an anode exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity and excellent charge-transfer capability. In addition, because EE is calculated using CE and VE, the trend of EE reflects that of VE. The EE is a crucial marker for assessing battery performance, as it signifies the battery's ability to convert and store energy efficiently. Figure 8 (b) appears the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode achieves an EE of up to 93.51% at a current density of 40 mA cm − 2 . Interestingly, the difference in the EE between the HGF-negative electrode and the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode gradually increased with increasing current density during battery operation. Specifically, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode exhibited higher EE compared with the HGF negative electrode by 7.226%, 6.912%, 8.236%, and 9.410% at current densities range of 40, 80, 120, and 160 mA cm − 2 , respectively. This improvement is attributed to the NiO/rGO layer, which acts as an electrode catalyst and provides a more effective active surface area, significantly reducing the polarization characteristic. The assembled full cells with HGF cathode and NiO/rGO-HGF anode were subjected to 100 cycles at a current density of 160 mA cm − 2 to evaluate their cycle stability. In Fig. 9 (a), the initial capacity of the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode was 607.4 mAh. After 100 cycles, the capacity was 514.6 mAh, indicating a superior retention rate of 84.7%. Conversely, the discharge capacity of the HGF negative electrode decreased from 550.5 mAh to 278.1 mAh, corresponding to a poor cycle stability with the retention rate of 50.5%. Furthermore, Fig. 9 (b) shows that the NiO/rGO HGF-negative electrode maintained a higher EE even after 100 cycles (76.35%). This highlights the excellent energy-storage capacity and superior electrochemical stability of NiO/rGO-HGF. This enhancement can be attributed to the following three factors. First, an NiO-decorated rGO functional layer was uniformly applied to the HGF surface, resulting in enhanced electrocatalytic activity. Secondly, rGO modified the surface functional groups, thereby increasing its cycle stability. Third, the negatively charged O 2− ions on NiO enhance the adhesion of vanadium ions to HGF, which contributes to the high EE and improved electrical conductivity. 4. Conclusion We synthesized highly active and low-cost NiO/rGO functional layer-decorated graphite felt electrodes for VRFB using a simple hydrothermal method and ultrasonic spraying. Analysis of the data obtained from CV and EIS measurements showed that the NiO/rGO catalysts exhibited remarkable kinetic reversibility and substantial electrochemical activity because of their ability to facilitate the V 3+ /V 2+ redox reaction. Thus, the electrochemical performance of VRFB using NiO/rGO-HGF was enhanced, including the high EE as high as 93.51% at a current density of 40 mA cm − 2 . In addition, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode exhibits a high capacity retention rate (84.7%) during a 100 cycle durability test at a current density of 160 mA cm − 2 . These results are attributed to the following: (1) The NiO-decorated rGO functional layer effectively enhanced the specific surface area and provided high electrocatalytic activity. (2) rGO provides oxygen-containing functional groups together with anchoring sites for NiO, allowing superior cyclability. (3) The negatively charged O 2− ions of NiO facilitated vanadium ion adhesion to the electrode, which contributed to the EE. These results suggest that NiO/rGO-HGF has significant potential as an electrode material for enhancing the electrochemical activity and stability of VRFB anodes. Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Research Program funded by the SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology). References M. Skyllas-Kazacos, D. Kasherman, D.R. Hong, M. Kazacos, J. Power Sources , 35 , 399404 (1991). B. Dunn, H. Kamath, J.M. Tarascon, J. Science , 334 , 928935 (2011). K.J. Kim, M.-S. Park, Y.-J. Kim, J.H. Dou, S.X. Dou, M. Skyllas-Kazacos, J. Mater. Chem. A , 3 , 16913 (2015). M. Skyllas-Kazacos, M. Rychcik, Soc. , 133 , 1057 (1986). B.Sun, M. Skyllas-Kazacos, Electrochim. Acta , 37 , 1253 (1992). L. Yue, W. Li, F. Sun, L. Zhao, L. Xing, Carbon , 48 , 3079 (2010). Z. He, Y. Jiang, W. Meng, F. Jiang, H. Zhou, Y. Li, J. Zhu, L. Wang, L. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci. , 423 , 111 (2017). K.J. Kim, Y.-J. Kim, J.-H. Kim, M.-S. Park, Mater. Chem. Phys. , 131 , 547 (2011) . Z. He, Y. Lv, T. Zhang, Y. Zhu, L. Dai, S. Yao, W. Zhu, L. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. , 427 , 131680 (2022). X. Wu, H. Xu, P. Xu, Y. Shen, L. Lu, J. Shi, J. Fu, H. Zhao, J. Power Sources , 263 , 104 (2014). L. Wei, T.S. Zhao, G. Zhao, L. An, L. Zeng, Appl. Energy , 176 , 74 (2016). L. Wu, Y. Shen, L. Yu, J. Xi, X. Qiu, Nano Energy , 28 , 19 (2016). Y. Gao, H. Wang, Q. Ma, A. Wu, W. Zhang, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Zeng, X. -X. Wu, Y. Wu, Carbon , 148 , 15 (2019). C. Noh, C.S. Lee, W.S. Chi, Y. Chung, J.H. Kim, Y. Kwon, J. Electrochem. Soc. , 165 , 1388 (2018). G. Hu, M. Jing, D.W. Wang, Z. Sun, C. Xu, W. Ren, H.-M. Cheng, C. Yan, X. Fan, F. Li, Energy Storage Mater. , 13 , 66 (2018). P.M. Nia, E. Abouzari-Lotf, P.M. Woi, Y. Alias, T.M. Ting, Electrochim. Acta , 297 , 31 (2019). J. Vázquez‐Galván, C. Flox, C. Fàbrega, E. Ventosa, A. Parra, T. Andreu, J.R. Morante, ChemSusChem , 10 , 2089 (2017). A. Ejigu, M. Edwards, D.A. Walsh, ACS Catal. , 5 , 7122 (2015). M.G. Hosseini, S. Mousavihashemi, S. Murcia-López, C. Flox, T. Andreu, J.R. Morante, Carbon , 136 , 444 (2018). M. Jing, X. Zhang, X. Fan, L. Zhao, J. Liu, C. Yan, Electrochim. Acta , 215 57 (2016). X. Wu, H. Xu, L. Lu, H. Zhao, J. Fu, Y. Shen, P. Xu, Y. Dong, J. Power Sources , 250 , 274 (2014). N. Yun, J.J. Park, O.O. Park, K.B. Lee, J.H. Yang, Electrochim. Acta , 278 , 226 (2018). J. Zhang, J. Jiang, H. Li, X.S. Zhao, Energy Environ. Sci. , 4 , 4009 (2011). Y. Liu, Y. Jiang, Y. Lv, Z. He, L. Dai, L. Wang, Molecules , 26 , 5085 (2021). W.-F. Liu, K.-H. Kim, H.-J. Ahn, J. Alloy. Compd. , 954 , 170106 (2023). R. Raccichini, A. Varzi, S. Passerini, B. Scrosati, Nat. Mater. , 14 , 271 (2015). M. Jing, Z. Hou, H. Yang, G. Li, M. Zhou, W. Xu, J. Mater. Res. , 31 , 3666 (2016). K.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Song, H.-J. Ahn, Korean J. Chem. Eng. , 40 , 1071 (2023). Y. Ma, L. Sheng, H. Zhao, K. An, L. Yu, J. Xu, X. Zhao, Solid State Sci. , 46 , 49 (2015). A. Mirzaei, K. Janghorban, B. Hashemi, M. Bonyani, S.G. Leonardi, G. Neri, J. Nanostructure Chem. , 7 , 37 (2017). Y. Zhu, H. Guo, Y. Wu, C. Cao, S. Tao, Z. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A , 2 , 7904 (2014). J. Xu, L. Wu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Liu, S. Shu, X. Kang, Q. Song, D. Liu, F. Huang, Y. Hu, Surf. Interfaces , 18 , 100420 (2020). B. Varghese, M.V. Reddy, Z. Yanwu, C.S. Lit, T.C. Hoong, G.V. Subba Rao, B.V.R. Chowdari, A.T.S. Wee, C.T. Lim, C.-H. Sow, Chem. Mat. , 20 , 3360 (2008). W. Liu, C. Lu, X. Wang, K. Liang, B.K. Tay, J. Mater. Chem. A , 3 , 624 (2015). J. Liu, W. Lv, W. Wei, C. Zhang, Z. Li, B. Li, F. Kang, Q.-H. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A , 2 , 3031 (2014). D.-B. Moon, K.-H. Kim, H.-J. Ahn, Korean J. Chem. Eng. , 40 , 3046 (2023). P. Han, Y. Yue, Z. Liu, W. Xu, L. Zhang, H. Xu, S. Dong, G. Cui, Energy Environ. Sci. , 4 , 4710 (2011). E. Bai, H. Zhu, C. Sun, G. Liu, X. Xie, C. Xu, S. Wu, Membranes , 13 , 820 (2023). H.R. Jiang, W. Shyy, Y.X. Ren, R.H. Zhang, T.S. Zhao, Appl. Energy , 233 , 544 (2019). L. Wei, C. Xiong, H.R. Jiang, X.Z. Fan, T.S. Zhao, Energy Storage Mater. , 25 , 885 (2020). Table 1 Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Mar, 2024 Read the published version in Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Minor Revisions Needed 19 Feb, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 11 Feb, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 11 Feb, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 01 Feb, 2024 First submitted to journal 30 Jan, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3916888","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":272301916,"identity":"99632a3c-a0e3-4b38-b97b-c861d8f3afd7","order_by":0,"name":"Wen-Fei Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Seoul National University of Science \u0026 Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wen-Fei","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":272301917,"identity":"e05c1593-9ce8-4471-b794-c0fe33655d80","order_by":1,"name":"Kue-Ho Kim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Seoul National University of Science \u0026 Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kue-Ho","middleName":"","lastName":"Kim","suffix":""},{"id":272301918,"identity":"fb22a8bf-29e0-4c0b-91be-1e3c87391417","order_by":2,"name":"Hyo-Jin Ahn","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5786-3937","institution":"Seoul National University of Science and Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hyo-Jin","middleName":"","lastName":"Ahn","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-02-01 09:43:53","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00156-8","type":"published","date":"2024-03-21T15:00:53+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":51054661,"identity":"3b8c5b3a-0057-4f61-b6a8-64767de0d738","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:56","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":87139,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eA schematic illustration depicting the fabrication process for rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/74c1539eb715c2d0eb3d2633.png"},{"id":51054666,"identity":"73071302-2173-4a27-8d7e-05015d32cbe0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:57","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":926325,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a–f) HRSEM images of HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF samples with (g) EDS mapping data of NiO/rGO-HGF.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/cb095d31e7124c09f7c733ec.png"},{"id":51054663,"identity":"9129b9a0-9c98-4916-983c-3d183124c14f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:56","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":240453,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eXRD patterns of rGO powder and NiO/rGO powder.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/c6480b2b3c209ee24fd08ab7.png"},{"id":51054660,"identity":"7de24e5a-9bb8-4bc1-a5e6-2c670b64704b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:56","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":294443,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eXPS data obtained from NiO/rGO powder, magnified specific (a) Ni 2p, (b) C 1 s, and (c) O 1 s.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/7749c02e47038438cfb3b85e.png"},{"id":51054669,"identity":"52536ef4-82ef-4bd1-9975-bf89c2670731","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:57","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":694677,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe contact angle measurements of (a) HGF, (b) rGO-HGF, and (c) NiO/rGO-HGF.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/95427a05c8852439476592cf.png"},{"id":51054657,"identity":"513e2957-91f9-45ef-a92e-ba49f3d3e8af","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:56","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":29748,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe CV curves at a scan rate of 5 mV/s and (b) Nyquist plots of various electrodes in a solution of 1.5 M V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e + 3 M H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/ed51701911ba75323ec96200.png"},{"id":51054668,"identity":"1355526c-1ab9-4dfa-95c9-2e826fe4431a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:57","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":55554,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCV curves of (a) HGF and (b) NiO/rGO-HGF at different scan rates, obtained by using a negative electrolyte. (c) Plots of peak current redox reactions versus the square root of scan rate measured at pristine GF, for the V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e/V\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e redox reaction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/e1c6ea008259dddcba2abdcd.png"},{"id":51054665,"identity":"d3877988-64d5-493b-b4f2-9206b8bde97d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:29:56","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":104725,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) Charge–discharge curves of the HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF at a current density of 120 mA/cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, (b) energy, (c) coulombic, and (d) voltage efficiencies of the cells with the cycle number at current densities, 40–160 mA/cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/63a9849253e928c0f1fb6af2.png"},{"id":51055818,"identity":"cf51e325-ebcc-4a79-9342-70e3c56bb6c7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 11:37:57","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":50805,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) Discharge capacity retention and (b) Energy efficiencies at a current density\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eof 160 mA/cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e for 100 cycle.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/5ca10cc4a840bbc4fd9bd6c7.png"},{"id":53403691,"identity":"d9a9d769-c25a-486b-81d4-4b3ad08f8319","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-25 15:13:50","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2205131,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3916888/v1/8b4f847a-246e-4da9-a60d-4ed41c7f6453.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the graphite felt as the negative electrode of vanadium redox flow batteries","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eWith decreasing fossil fuel reserves and the growing environmental crisis, the global challenge lies in advancing the renewable energy sources, including wind and solar power. [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Accordingly, separated energy storage systems have been adopted to compensate the disadvantages of renewable power generators such as instability and intermittency during the operation. After the pioneering work of Skyllas-Kazacos research group, the vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) have known for their various benefits, including long-term cyclability and low levelized cost of energy. VRFBs utilize same electrochemical reaction species (vanadium) in both electrodes at the different valence states, which strategy effectively mitigates the risks associated with cross-contamination [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe electrode takes crucial part for the VRFB and serves as a locus for redox reactions. Its efficiency directly governs the power density and the energy-conversion efficiency of the VRFB. Graphite felt (GF) is the prevalent choice for VRFB electrodes, owing to its corrosion-resistant three-dimensional porous structure and cost-effectiveness. However, the utilization of pristine GF as the negative electrode in VRFBs introduces challenges, including suboptimal hydrophilicity, insufficient active sites, and pronounced side reactions leading to hydrogen precipitation. To improve the energy storage capability of VRFBs and improve commercial viability, researchers have redirected their efforts toward augmenting the surface characteristics of electrodes. For example, to increase the effective active sites during the charge and discharge, thermal activation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], acid treatment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e], water activation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e], plasma treatment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e], electrochemical oxidation treatment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e] and microwave treatment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e] are used to modify the surface functional groups of electrodes. Modification with carbonaceous materials, such as carbon nanoparticles [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e], carbon spheres [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], carbon flakes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e], carbon nanotubes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], graphene [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e], and graphene oxide [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e], increases the electrochemical active sites and provides accelerated electrical conductivity. Furthermore, some inexpensive metal oxides (including TiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e], Mn\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], WO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e], CeO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e], and PbO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]) have been used as catalysts to provide more reactive sites and increase the hydrophilicity of the GF. Yun et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e] synthesized NiO nanocatalysts on GF surfaces via distributed thermal decomposition. In this study, nickel ions modified the oxygen-related surface functional groups by substituting H\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e to the hydroxyl groups. Moreover, the negatively charged NiO nanoparticles also showed good vanadium ions adsorption, which effectively improved the energy storage capability. However, the agglomeration and uneven distribution of nanoparticles on the electrode remain a challenge. Furthermore, these nanoparticles are often detached from the substrate during VRFB cycling, degrading the cycle stability. Thus, the uniform anchoring of metal oxide particles is a crucial technique for improving the efficiency and stability of VRFB.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReduced graphene oxide (rGO), on the other hand, boasts a two-dimensional layered structure with an expansive active specific surface area [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. When employed as a carrier for NiO, it effectively mitigates the intrinsic low electrical conductivity associated with metal oxides [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, rGO provides an abundance of anchoring sites for NiO, ensuring a uniform distribution and preventing the agglomeration of NiO nanoparticles. Furthermore, during battery cycling, the nanoparticles adhered securely to the electrode surface. The synergistic effect of the NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the GF electrode has not been investigated in detail for VRFB applications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, an NiO/rGO composite structure was successfully fabricated using a hydrothermal method. The prepared NiO/rGO nanocatalysts were then uniformly coated on the surface of HGF by ultrasonic spraying system. Because rGO with a high electrical conductivity provided anchor sites for NiO, the NiO nanoparticles were well distributed on the rGO surface and did not easily agglomerate. Introducing NiO nanoparticles into rGO provided abundant catalytically active sites and improved its charge transfer capability. This strategy was applied to a VRFB anode that exhibited high catalytic activity and excellent cycling stability.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Experimental","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo remove impurities at the surface, graphite felt (GF, 4.2 mm thickness, Sinopro) was repeatedly cleaned with deionized water (DI water) and ethanol. After drying, the felt was heated in a 500\u0026deg;C oven using air atmosphere for 10 h to activate the surface of GF (thereafter referred to as HGF). NiO-decorated rGO was successfully fabricated via a hydrothermal method and following calcination process. The 15 min ultrasonic process was used to disperse the 0.05 g) into 10 ml of DI water. Then, 30 ml of 2mM nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026middot;6H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, SAMCHUN) and 2 mM urea (CH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003eN\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, Aldrich) solution were homogeneously mixed with rGO solution after stirring for 3 h. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, the resulting precursor was then poured to a 50 mL reaction chamber, to progress the hydrothermal reaction for 6 h under 180\u0026deg;C. The precipitates were then centrifuged several times with ethyl alcohol and DI water to eliminate the residual reactants. The resulting product was dried at 80 ℃. Then, the resultant sample was heat treated at 400\u0026deg;C for 3 h using N\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e gas to synthesize NiO/rGO powder. The dispersion solution of the sample, containing 0.5 wt% NiO/rGO and 0.1 wt% CMC dissolved in DI water was uniformly sprayed onto the HGF surface using an ultrasonic spray-coating system. For ultrasonic spray coating, the suspension feed rate, frequency, spray time, hot plate temperature and distance between nozzle and HGF were set to 4 mL/h, 130 kHz, 5 min, 100\u0026deg;C and 25 cm, respectively. Furthermore, rGO-HGF was prepared using the same procedure to confirm the role of NiO layer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe surface morphology was characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted to investigate the crystalline phases and verify the chemical bonding states. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements with cyclic voltammetry (CV) were executed utilizing an AUTOLAB instrumentation platform, under a fixed voltage range from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.8 V to 0 V. During the electrochemical characteristic evaluation, 0.15 M V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e electrolyte with three-electrode measurement system at a scan rate of 5 mV s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. The prepared felts, Ag/AgCl, and Pt electrodes were served as working, reference, and counter electrodes, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA VRFB full-cell was introduced to evaluate the practical energy storage performance at the voltage range from 0.7 to 1.6 V. NiO/rGO-HGF and HGF were utilized as the negative and positive electrode to construct full-cell measurement system. Rectangular samples with dimensions of 20 \u0026times; 30 mm were cut from pristine HGF and used as the cathode side in the VRFB tests. For comparison, the anode side was tested successively with HGF, rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF samples. For the electrolyte, the 1.5 M V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e (20 mL) with 3.0M H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solvent and 1.5 M V\u003csup\u003e4+\u003c/sup\u003e (20 mL) with 3.0M H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solvent was adopted for the negative and positive part, respectively. Energy storage performance was investigated at current densities of 40, 80, 120, and 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e and a rapid cycling test was carried out at a current density of 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e for 100 cycles.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e appears the morphologies of the HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF felt. As demonstrated in previous research and shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e(a, d), HGF showed a smooth surface. In contrast, the surfaces of rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF treated by ultrasonic spraying exhibited rough surface morphologies. Specifically, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e(b, e) show the 2D lamellar structure of rGO, which uniformly envelops the HGF surface. This phenomenon is contributed by the van der Waals gravitational force, which causes rGO to curl and fold [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. The increased specific surface area of rGO facilitated interfacial interactions between the electrode and the vanadium electrolyte solution. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e(c) and (f), uniform decoration of small-sized NiO nanoparticles was observed on the rGO layer. This was a consequence of the defect sites in rGO, which provided favorable locations for the generation of NiO nanoparticles [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e(g), we present EDS elemental mapping of the NiO/rGO-HGF sample. These results clearly demonstrated the uniform elemental distribution on the electrode surface.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe rGO and NiO/rGO powder XRD spectra are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig12\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. For the rGO samples, the peak at ~\u0026thinsp;25.74\u0026deg; was detected, regarding the graphite (002) structures [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. The NiO/rGO sample shows slightly decreased graphite peaks at approximately 29.1\u0026deg;, together with additional peaks at 37.1\u0026deg;, 43.1\u0026deg;, 62.9\u0026deg;, and 75.04\u0026deg;. These observations correspond to the diffraction peaks of NiO, implying that the crystallographic planes are indexed as (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. This confirms that the hydrothermal synthesis and subsequent thermal treatment successfully produced the NiO/rGO composite structure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eXPS was performed on the NiO/rGO sample to investigate its chemical bonding structure. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig13\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e(a), the binding energy exhibits a primary peak along with satellite peaks at ~\u0026thinsp;854.8 eV and ~\u0026thinsp;861.2 eV, corresponding to the Ni 2p\u003csub\u003e3/2\u003c/sub\u003e spin-orbit energy levels. At the same time, the Ni 2p\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e spin-orbit energy level of nickel oxide is corresponding to the main peak at ~\u0026thinsp;872.6 eV and the satellite peak at ~\u0026thinsp;879.4 eV, which supports the predominance of Ni in the +\u0026thinsp;2 valence state [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig13\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e(b) presents the fitted XPS data for the C 1s region, including three distinguishable peaks. These peaks are located at ~\u0026thinsp;284.5 eV, ~\u0026thinsp;286.2 eV, and ~\u0026thinsp;288.0 eV respectively, corresponding to the binding energies of C\u0026ndash;C, C\u0026ndash;O and O\u0026ndash;C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;O at the 1s electron level. Notably, the successful reduction of GO to rGO during heat treatment is indicated by the weaker peaks of the C\u0026ndash;O and O\u0026ndash;C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;O peaks than those of C\u0026ndash;C [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig13\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e(c) shows the XPS spectrum of the O 1s region, that indicates the existence of O-containing functional groups within the NiO-rGO composite. Among these peaks, the characteristic peak at ~\u0026thinsp;529.3 eV and ~\u0026thinsp;529.5 eV corresponds to general metal oxide bonding, including the C\u0026ndash;O\u0026ndash;Ni and Ni-O bonds [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. Generally, nickel forms bonds with the oxygen-containing functional groups or carbon atoms in rGO. However, NiO-rGO sample showed no characteristic peak at ~\u0026thinsp;283.5 eV (indicative of Ni\u0026ndash;C) in the C1s spectrum, suggesting that NiO interacts with rGO primarily through C\u0026ndash;O\u0026ndash;Ni bonds [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, the characteristic peak at ~\u0026thinsp;531.1 eV corresponds to C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;O bonds, and the peak at ~\u0026thinsp;532.9 eV corresponds to C\u0026ndash;OH bonds [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig14\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e(a) shows the high contact angle of 131.7\u0026deg; obtained for the HGF electrode, indicating poor hydrophilicity and low electrolyte wettability. In contrast, when V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e electrolyte was dropped onto the surfaces of rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig14\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb, c), the droplets were rapidly absorbed. This observation demonstrated the high hydrophilicity of the rGO-HGF and NiO/rGO-HGF electrodes. The increased hydrophilicity was owing to the substantial incorporation of oxygen related surface functional groups into the NiO/rGO catalyst. These incorporated functional groups promote more favorable electrolyte wetting process, thereby accelerating the diffusion of the V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e electrolyte.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to examine the effects of rGO and NiO/rGO on the V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e/V\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e reaction kinetics. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig15\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e(a) and Table\u0026nbsp;(1) show CV plots of HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF for the V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e/V\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e redox pair containing 0.15 M V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e+3 M H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e at a scan rate of 5 mV s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Notably, compared with pristine HGFs, HGFs treated with rGO and NiO/rGO layers showed reduced peak separation and increased peak current values. Thus, the rGO and NiO/rGO exhibit favorable reversibility and electrochemical activity as catalysts for V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e/V\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e redox reactions. EIS was performed systematically on all electrodes to validate this conclusion. EIS is a valuable and indispensable technique for probing the kinetic properties at the surface of electrode during the electrochemical reactions. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig15\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e(b), the negative Nyquist plots for different graphite felts are presented, where the diameters of the semicircles are inversely correlated with the charge transfer resistance (R\u003csub\u003ect\u003c/sub\u003e) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. Notably, HGFs with the rGO and the NiO/rGO layer was showed significantly lower R\u003csub\u003ect\u003c/sub\u003e than that of the pristine HGF, which also supports the CV results. Therefore, based on the EIS and CV data, the effect of NiO/rGO functional layer on the graphite felt was confirmed, which improved the catalytic activity of the HGFs during the vanadium redox reactions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor evaluating the electrochemical activity and stability of the electrodes, we performed negative cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests with varying scan rates from 1 to 10 mV s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. The results are displayed in Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig16\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e(a) and (b). It is noteworthy that the NiO/rGO-HGFs consistently exhibited improved peak current values at all scan rates. This suggests that the stability and reversibility of HGF are inferior to those of NiO/rGO-HGF [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig17\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e(a) shows the galvanostatic charge/discharge data with HGF, rGO-HGF, and NiO/rGO-HGF electrodes at a current density of 120 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e. Interestingly, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode VRFB had an increased discharge and a reduced charge plateau. This indicates that NiO/rGO-HGF effectively mitigates electrochemical polarization, thereby improving the overall battery performance. For demonstrating the performance of the VRFB with the NiO/rGO-HGF anode, single-cell experiments were conducted at various applied current densities, as exhibited in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig17\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e(b-d). These figures show energy efficiency (EE), coulombic efficiency (CE) and voltage efficiency (VE) data for current densities from 40 to 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e. The VE improved owing to the increased vanadium ion penetration rate according to the current increment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Nonetheless, the simultaneous rise in current density results in an accelerated charge and discharge rate, which in turn leads to an increased overpotential and reduces both EE and VE [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. Because VE is closely correlated with the overpotential, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode consistently exhibited a higher VE compared to pure HGF at various current densities. This suggests that the NiO/rGO layer as an anode exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity and excellent charge-transfer capability. In addition, because EE is calculated using CE and VE, the trend of EE reflects that of VE. The EE is a crucial marker for assessing battery performance, as it signifies the battery's ability to convert and store energy efficiently. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig17\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e(b) appears the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode achieves an EE of up to 93.51% at a current density of 40 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e. Interestingly, the difference in the EE between the HGF-negative electrode and the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode gradually increased with increasing current density during battery operation. Specifically, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode exhibited higher EE compared with the HGF negative electrode by 7.226%, 6.912%, 8.236%, and 9.410% at current densities range of 40, 80, 120, and 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e, respectively. This improvement is attributed to the NiO/rGO layer, which acts as an electrode catalyst and provides a more effective active surface area, significantly reducing the polarization characteristic. The assembled full cells with HGF cathode and NiO/rGO-HGF anode were subjected to 100 cycles at a current density of 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e to evaluate their cycle stability. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig18\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e(a), the initial capacity of the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode was 607.4 mAh. After 100 cycles, the capacity was 514.6 mAh, indicating a superior retention rate of 84.7%. Conversely, the discharge capacity of the HGF negative electrode decreased from 550.5 mAh to 278.1 mAh, corresponding to a poor cycle stability with the retention rate of 50.5%. Furthermore, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig18\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e(b) shows that the NiO/rGO HGF-negative electrode maintained a higher EE even after 100 cycles (76.35%). This highlights the excellent energy-storage capacity and superior electrochemical stability of NiO/rGO-HGF. This enhancement can be attributed to the following three factors. First, an NiO-decorated rGO functional layer was uniformly applied to the HGF surface, resulting in enhanced electrocatalytic activity. Secondly, rGO modified the surface functional groups, thereby increasing its cycle stability. Third, the negatively charged O\u003csup\u003e2\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e ions on NiO enhance the adhesion of vanadium ions to HGF, which contributes to the high EE and improved electrical conductivity.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe synthesized highly active and low-cost NiO/rGO functional layer-decorated graphite felt electrodes for VRFB using a simple hydrothermal method and ultrasonic spraying. Analysis of the data obtained from CV and EIS measurements showed that the NiO/rGO catalysts exhibited remarkable kinetic reversibility and substantial electrochemical activity because of their ability to facilitate the V\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e/V\u003csup\u003e2+\u003c/sup\u003e redox reaction. Thus, the electrochemical performance of VRFB using NiO/rGO-HGF was enhanced, including the high EE as high as 93.51% at a current density of 40 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e. In addition, the NiO/rGO-HGF negative electrode exhibits a high capacity retention rate (84.7%) during a 100 cycle durability test at a current density of 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e. These results are attributed to the following: (1) The NiO-decorated rGO functional layer effectively enhanced the specific surface area and provided high electrocatalytic activity. (2) rGO provides oxygen-containing functional groups together with anchoring sites for NiO, allowing superior cyclability. (3) The negatively charged O\u003csup\u003e2\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e ions of NiO facilitated vanadium ion adhesion to the electrode, which contributed to the EE. These results suggest that NiO/rGO-HGF has significant potential as an electrode material for enhancing the electrochemical activity and stability of VRFB anodes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was supported by the Research Program funded by the SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM. Skyllas-Kazacos, D. Kasherman, D.R. Hong, M. Kazacos,\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eJ. Power Sources\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e35\u003c/strong\u003e, 399404 (1991).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eB. Dunn, H. Kamath, J.M. Tarascon, \u003cem\u003eJ. Science\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e334\u003c/strong\u003e, 928935 (2011). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eK.J. Kim, M.-S. Park, Y.-J. Kim, J.H. Dou, S.X. Dou, M. Skyllas-Kazacos, \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Chem. A\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e, 16913 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM. Skyllas-Kazacos, M. Rychcik, \u003cem\u003eSoc.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e133\u003c/strong\u003e, 1057 (1986).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eB.Sun, M. Skyllas-Kazacos, \u003cem\u003eElectrochim. Acta\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e37\u003c/strong\u003e, 1253 (1992).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Yue, W. Li, F. Sun, L. Zhao, L. Xing, \u003cem\u003eCarbon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e48\u003c/strong\u003e, 3079 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZ. He, Y. Jiang, W. Meng, F. Jiang, H. Zhou, Y. Li, J. Zhu, L. Wang, L. Dai, \u003cem\u003eAppl. Surf. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e423\u003c/strong\u003e, 111 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eK.J. Kim, Y.-J. Kim, J.-H. Kim, M.-S. Park, \u003cem\u003eMater. Chem. Phys.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e131\u003c/strong\u003e, 547 (2011) .\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZ. He, Y. Lv, T. Zhang, Y. Zhu, L. Dai, S. Yao, W. Zhu, L. Wang, \u003cem\u003eChem. Eng. J.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e427\u003c/strong\u003e, 131680 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eX. Wu, H. Xu, P. Xu, Y. Shen, L. Lu, J. Shi, J. Fu, H. Zhao, \u003cem\u003eJ. Power Sources\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e263\u003c/strong\u003e, 104 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Wei, T.S. Zhao, G. Zhao, L. An, L. Zeng, \u003cem\u003eAppl. Energy\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e176\u003c/strong\u003e, 74 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Wu, Y. Shen, L. Yu, J. Xi, X. Qiu, \u003cem\u003eNano Energy\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 19 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eY. Gao, H. Wang, Q. Ma, A. Wu, W. Zhang, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Zeng, X. -X. Wu, Y. Wu, \u003cem\u003eCarbon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e148\u003c/strong\u003e, 15 (2019).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eC. Noh, C.S. Lee, W.S. Chi, Y. Chung, J.H. Kim, Y. Kwon, \u003cem\u003eJ. Electrochem. Soc.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e165\u003c/strong\u003e, 1388 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eG. Hu, M. Jing, D.W. Wang, Z. Sun, C. Xu, W. Ren, H.-M. Cheng, C. Yan, X. Fan, F. Li, \u003cem\u003eEnergy Storage Mater.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, 66 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP.M. Nia, E. Abouzari-Lotf, P.M. Woi, Y. Alias, T.M. Ting, \u003cem\u003eElectrochim. Acta\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e297\u003c/strong\u003e, 31 (2019).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJ. V\u0026aacute;zquez‐Galv\u0026aacute;n, C. Flox, C. F\u0026agrave;brega, E. Ventosa, A. Parra, T. Andreu, J.R. Morante, \u003cem\u003eChemSusChem\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e10\u003c/strong\u003e, 2089 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA. Ejigu, M. Edwards, D.A. Walsh, \u003cem\u003eACS Catal.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e5\u003c/strong\u003e, 7122 (2015). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM.G. Hosseini, S. Mousavihashemi, S. Murcia-L\u0026oacute;pez, C. Flox, T. Andreu, J.R. Morante, \u003cem\u003eCarbon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e136\u003c/strong\u003e, 444 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM. Jing, X. Zhang, X. Fan, L. Zhao, J. Liu, C. Yan, \u003cem\u003eElectrochim. Acta\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e215\u003c/strong\u003e 57 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eX. Wu, H. Xu, L. Lu, H. Zhao, J. Fu, Y. Shen, P. Xu, Y. Dong, \u003cem\u003eJ. Power Sources\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e250\u003c/strong\u003e, 274 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eN. Yun, J.J. Park, O.O. Park, K.B. Lee, J.H. Yang, \u003cem\u003eElectrochim. Acta\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e278\u003c/strong\u003e, 226 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJ. Zhang, J. Jiang, H. Li, X.S. Zhao, \u003cem\u003eEnergy Environ. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 4009 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eY. Liu, Y. Jiang, Y. Lv, Z. He, L. Dai, L. Wang, \u003cem\u003eMolecules\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 5085 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eW.-F. Liu, K.-H. Kim, H.-J. Ahn, \u003cem\u003eJ. Alloy. Compd.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e954\u003c/strong\u003e, 170106 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eR. Raccichini, A. Varzi, S. Passerini, B. Scrosati, \u003cem\u003eNat. Mater.\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e, 271 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM. Jing, Z. Hou, H. Yang, G. Li, M. Zhou, W. Xu, \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Res.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e31\u003c/strong\u003e, 3666 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eK.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Song, H.-J. Ahn, \u003cem\u003eKorean J. Chem. Eng.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e40\u003c/strong\u003e, 1071 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eY. Ma, L. Sheng, H. Zhao, K. An, L. Yu, J. Xu, X. Zhao, \u003cem\u003eSolid State Sci.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e46\u003c/strong\u003e, 49 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA. Mirzaei, K. Janghorban, B. Hashemi, M. Bonyani, S.G. Leonardi, G. Neri, \u003cem\u003eJ. Nanostructure Chem.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e7\u003c/strong\u003e, 37 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eY. Zhu, H. Guo, Y. Wu, C. Cao, S. Tao, Z. Wu, \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Chem. A\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 7904 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJ. Xu, L. Wu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Liu, S. Shu, X. Kang, Q. Song, D. Liu, F. Huang, Y. Hu, \u003cem\u003eSurf. Interfaces\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e18\u003c/strong\u003e, 100420 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eB. Varghese, M.V. Reddy, Z. Yanwu, C.S. Lit, T.C. Hoong, G.V. Subba Rao, B.V.R. Chowdari, A.T.S. Wee, C.T. Lim, C.-H. Sow,\u003cem\u003e Chem. Mat.\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e 20\u003c/strong\u003e, 3360 (2008).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eW. Liu, C. Lu, X. Wang, K. Liang, B.K. Tay, \u003cem\u003eJ. Mater. Chem. A\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cstrong\u003e 3\u003c/strong\u003e, 624 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJ. Liu, W. Lv, W. Wei, C. Zhang, Z. Li, B. Li, F. Kang, Q.-H. Yang,\u003cem\u003e J. Mater. Chem. A\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e, 3031 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD.-B. Moon, K.-H. Kim, H.-J. Ahn, \u003cem\u003eKorean J. Chem. Eng.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e40\u003c/strong\u003e, 3046 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP. Han, Y. Yue, Z. Liu, W. Xu, L. Zhang, H. Xu, S. Dong, G. Cui, \u003cem\u003eEnergy Environ. Sci.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 4710 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eE. Bai, H. Zhu, C. Sun, G. Liu, X. Xie, C. Xu, S. Wu, \u003cem\u003eMembranes\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, 820 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eH.R. Jiang, W. Shyy, Y.X. Ren, R.H. Zhang, T.S. Zhao, \u003cem\u003eAppl. Energy\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e233\u003c/strong\u003e, 544 (2019).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Wei, C. Xiong, H.R. Jiang, X.Z. Fan, T.S. Zhao, \u003cem\u003eEnergy Storage Mater.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003e25\u003c/strong\u003e, 885 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Table 1","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https://myfiles.space/user_files/122228_c8a1650c59388082/122228_custom_files/img1707823351.png\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"korean-journal-of-chemical-engineering","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"kjce","sideBox":"Learn more about [Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering](http://link.springer.com/journal/11814)","snPcode":"11814","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/kjce/default2.aspx","title":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Subscription","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Vanadium redox flow batteries, Negative electrode, Graphite felt, Reduced graphene oxide, Nickel oxide","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eVanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) are prospective energy storage medium owing to their flexible design and long lifetime. However, the problem of sluggish negative electrode dynamics of VRFBs has become a great resistance to their large-scale commercial applications. To solve this problem, we employed a facile and cost-effective approach to synthesize NiO/rGO composites using hydrothermal and calcination processes. The NiO/rGO nanocatalysts were evenly applied onto the heat-treated graphite felt (HGF) to prepare a high-performance negative electrode for VRFBs. This coating process was achieved using an ultrasonic spraying system, resulting in NiO/rGO-HGF. The NiO/rGO electrocatalysts provided enhanced adsorption characteristics of vanadium ions and sufficient redox-reactive sites, which improved electrochemical performance (9.41% higher energy efficiency of NiO/rGO-HGF compared with HGF at 160 mA cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e) and high cycle stability (84.7% electrolyte capacity after 100 cycles) of the VRFB cells. In conclusion, our work with the NiO/rGO-HGF anode represents a promising direction for the development of highly efficient and stable VRFB anodes for broadening commercial applications.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"NiO-decorated rGO functional layer on the graphite felt as the negative electrode of vanadium redox flow batteries","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-02-13 11:29:51","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3916888/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Minor Revisions Needed","date":"2024-02-19T07:31:42+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2024-02-11T11:41:49+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-02-11T06:03:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-02-02T02:45:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","date":"2024-01-31T02:22:36+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"korean-journal-of-chemical-engineering","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"kjce","sideBox":"Learn more about [Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering](http://link.springer.com/journal/11814)","snPcode":"11814","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/kjce/default2.aspx","title":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Subscription","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"55e199c4-0c6f-40ca-a5a9-b4f9a88e53b9","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 13th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-03-25T15:07:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-3916888","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00156-8","journal":{"identity":"korean-journal-of-chemical-engineering","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering"},"publishedOn":"2024-03-21 15:00:53","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 21st, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-02-13 11:29:51","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s11814-024-00156-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00156-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3916888","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3916888","identity":"rs-3916888","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}