Seasonal variation in wind speed and oceanic salt spray favors delayed reproduction in coastal yellow monkeyflowers

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,663 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Premise The optimal timing of reproduction depends on the relative risk and benefit of continued growth. These risks and benefits depend on the local environment, which varies seasonally. While temperature and water availability are well studied selective agents on reproductive timing, less is known about other seasonally variable factors.

Methods

To test whether seasonal variation in wind and salt spray influences selection on reproductive timing, we performed an experimental manipulation of flowering time and ocean exposure in a coastal environment. Flowering plants from twelve yellow monkeyflower populations spanning a coastal-to-inland gradient were placed on a coastal bluff in spring and summer, which differ in average wind speed. A subset of plants were protected from wind and salt spray, and the remaining plants were exposed to these factors.

Results

In the windier spring cohort, ocean-exposed individuals had severe necrosis and produced few flowers and seeds, while protected plants had little-to-no necrosis, producing more flowers and seeds than exposed plants. In the calmer summer cohort, ocean-exposed individuals had less severe necrosis and produced comparable numbers of flowers as protected plants. However, only coastal populations produced appreciable numbers of seeds when exposed to the ocean, consistent with prior evidence that coastal ecotypes are locally adapted.

Conclusions

Overall, these results suggest that seasonal variation in wind and salt spray is a key selective factor contributing to population differences in flowering time. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0