A BUTTERFLY IN THE LABYRINTH: DESCRIBING A 5-DOMAIN MODEL TO GUIDE LABYRINTH RESEARCH

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,420 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The article resulted from reflection on an experience in a labyrinth when a butterfly seemed to appear out of nowhere, and immediately changed the experience of the labyrinth walk. The purpose of this article is to describe five domains that influence the effects and outcomes of engaging with labyrinths as wellbeing technology. The domains are: the Labyrinth, itself; the Individual human person, who is engaging with the labyrinth; the Social context in which the engagement is set; the Transcendent domain of spiritual reality; and the Environment in which the engagement takes place. Each of the domains is briefly described and supported by examples from labyrinth-related literature. The benefits arising from the proposed model include making explicit the sources of enablements and constraints giving rise to labyrinth effects, and validates the use of qualitative data and methods, alongside calls for quantitative evidence. I conclude that the model is consistent with a qualitative, theoretical approach to research that describes the complex dynamics of engaging with a labyrinth. Future research to identify the relevant qualities within each of the five domains is proposed. Such research might draw upon information already available in the labyrinth literature, or arise from extended socio-technical system analyses, in which each of the five domains are investigated. Supplementary Material File (a butterfly in the labyrinth rgl.pdf) - Download - 160.61 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 951views 127downloads Citations Download citation Dr Robert G LINGARD. A BUTTERFLY IN THE LABYRINTH: DESCRIBING A 5-DOMAIN MODEL TO GUIDE LABYRINTH RESEARCH. Authorea. 09 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173645606.61274319/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173645606.61274319/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:18:04.506796+00:00