Authors’ Reply
letter
OA: closed
CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This letter to the editor discusses potential biases in meta-analyses and calls for greater transparency in statistical reporting to ensure the reliability of systematic reviews.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (4)
- INSTAGRAM USERS' CONTENT ON ENDOMETRIOSIS- DOES ENDOMETRIOSIS AWARENESS MONTH MAKE A DIFFERENCE? via openalex
- Using social media to educate women and healthcare providers on endometriosis: preliminary results via openalex
- W3130525010 via openalex
- W6767297738 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:43.494969+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK