Multi-Institution, Prospective Randomized Trial for Efficacy and Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma or Adenomyosis

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2013 · vol. 20(6) , pp. S86 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.282 · W2331913336
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

This prospective randomized trial compared single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine myoma or adenomyosis to assess efficacy and safety.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-17T06:25:09.426038+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK