BNIP3-mTOR Signaling Mediates Resistance to MET Inhibition in Glioblastoma

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,184 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain malignancy with poor prognosis due to rapid progression, extensive invasiveness, and intrinsic resistance to standard therapies. Aberrant activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), particularly MET, drives tumor proliferation, invasion, and therapy resistance. Here, we show that MET inhibition with crizotinib induces senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction in glioma-initiating cells (GICs), in part via downregulation of the mitochondrial protein BNIP3. However, BNIP3 downregulation activates mTOR signaling, enabling adaptive resistance. Targeting mTOR with everolimus in combination with crizotinib synergistically enhances anti-tumor effects, inducing apoptosis, senescence, and necroptosis, and significantly reducing cell viability and sphere-forming capacity. In orthotopic GBM xenograft models, this combination, particularly in a sequential regimen, markedly prolongs survival without overt toxicity. Our findings identify a BNIP3–mTOR signaling axis as a critical mediator of resistance to MET inhibition and provide a mechanistic rationale for combined MET and mTOR targeting as a promising therapeutic strategy in GBM. Statement of Translational Relevance Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a highly aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumor with limited therapeutic options. Our study identifies a BNIP3-mTOR signaling axis as a key mediator of resistance to MET inhibition. We show for the first time that combined MET and mTOR inhibition exhibits synergistic effects against GBM in vitro and in vivo. This combination prolongs survival without overt toxicity, providing a strong preclinical rationale for clinical evaluation in GBM patients with high MET expression and offering a promising strategy to overcome adaptive resistance. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Financial support: National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant (R21NS123606-01 to I.O.), Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH-20-1-0046 and W81XWH-21-1-0268 to I.O.). Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: Authors declare no competing financial interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0