Role of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy in previous cesarean section scar women
This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy in ten women with previous cesarean sections, finding it to be a safe alternative with minimal complications and shorter hospital stays.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective study evaluated the safety and feasibility of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) in women with previous cesarean section scars undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications at a rural tertiary center in Central India between 2013 and 2014. Ten women with one to three prior low transverse cesarean sections were included, while women with adnexal masses, endometriosis, or a uterine size >16 weeks were excluded; key outcomes included operative time, blood loss, difficulty separating the bladder, and intra- and post-operative complications. NDVH was successfully completed in all but one case, where bladder injury occurred and was repaired immediately, with minimal post-operative complications and mean surgery duration of about 50 minutes, blood loss about 150 mL, and hospital stay of 4–5 days. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it excluded endometriosis in its eligibility criteria.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,185 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (13)
- W1946642979 via openalex
- W1988177345 via openalex
- W1991920574 via openalex
- W2002469432 via openalex
- W2022273230 via openalex
- W2035998745 via openalex
- W2042571031 via openalex
- W2079794054 via openalex
- W2092190138 via openalex
- W2113723394 via openalex
- W2621174310 via openalex
- W3035228616 via openalex
- W4205713417 via openalex
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-15T01:00:31.152695+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00