Salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy reduces ovarian cancer risk-a nationwide study.

Yen JC, Wu TI, Stone R, Wang TL, Kala Visvanathan, Chen LY, Hsu MH, Ie−Ming Shih
JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024 · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkae027 · PMID:38588567 · PMC11078587
Observational OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-12 ⓘ

A nationwide study found that salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy significantly reduces the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer, supporting the fallopian tube as a tissue origin for these malignancies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-12 · read from full text ⓘ

This nationwide study utilized the National Health Insurance Research Database to evaluate the association between salpingectomy performed for ectopic pregnancy and subsequent ovarian cancer risk. The researchers conducted a cohort analysis comparing women who underwent salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy against those who did not, adjusting for potential confounders such as age and parity. The results indicated that salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of developing ovarian cancer later in life. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Recent studies propose fallopian tubes as the tissue origin for many ovarian epithelial cancers. To further support this paradigm, we assessed whether salpingectomy for treating ectopic pregnancy had a protective effect using the Taiwan Longitudinal National Health Research Database. We identified 316 882 women with surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy and 3 168 820 age- and index-date-matched controls from 2000 to 2016. In a nested cohort, 91.5% of cases underwent unilateral salpingectomy, suggesting that most surgically managed patients have salpingectomy. Over a follow-up period of 17 years, the ovarian carcinoma incidence was 0.0069 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.0060 to 0.0079) and 0.0089 (95% CI = 0.0086 to 0.0092) in the ectopic pregnancy and the control groups, respectively (P < .001). After adjusting the events to per 100 person-years, the hazard ratio (HR) in the ectopic pregnancy group was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.61 to 0.80). The risk reduction occurred only in epithelial ovarian cancer (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.86) and not in non-epithelial subtypes. These findings show a decrease in ovarian carcinoma incidence after salpingectomy for treating ectopic pregnancy.
Full text 3,091 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 7 sections · click to expand

Ack

We acknowledge the above funding for the salary support of some authors who were involved in the design, analysis, and manuscript preparation of this study. In addition, the NSTC grant supports the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.

Data

The deidentified NHIRD data are available for researchers to access following the application and authorization by the Department of Health and Welfare Data Center in Taiwan ( 23 ).

Author

Ju-Chuan Yen, MD (Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft), Tzu-I Wu, MD (Conceptualization; Investigation), Rebecca Stone, MD (Conceptualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing), Tian-Li Wang, PhD (Conceptualization; Resources; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing), Kala Visvanathan, MD (Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—review & editing), Li-Ying Chen, BS (Data curation; Resources; Validation), Min-Huei Hsu, MD, PhD (Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Resources; Supervision; Validation), Ie-Ming Shih, MD, PhD (Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing).

Funding

This study is supported by the Richard W. TeLinde Endowment, the Johns Hopkins University (to IMS), Break Through Cancer-IOC (to RS and IMS), NIH/NCI P50 CA228991 (to IMS and TLW), and NSTC112-2321-B-038-005 (to MHH).

Conflicts

None of the authors claims any conflict of interest in this study.

Contrib Info

Ju-Chuan Yen, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Ren-Ai Branch, and Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Tzu-I Wu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Cancer Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Rebecca Stone, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Tian-Li Wang, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. Kala Visvanathan, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. Li-Ying Chen, Graduate Institute of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Min-Huei Hsu, Graduate Institute of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Ie-Ming Shih, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Associated Data

The deidentified NHIRD data are available for researchers to access following the application and authorization by the Department of Health and Welfare Data Center in Taiwan ( 23 ).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0