Assessing the affinity spectrum of an antigen-specific memory B cell repertoire by inverted ImmunoSpot

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The biological efficacy of an antibody is largely defined by its affinity. Moreover, because the binding affinity of an antibody can span orders of magnitude, each antigen-specific B cell would not be expected to contribute equally to humoral defense: high-affinity antibodies are likely to possess increased potency in comparison to those with lower affinities. Hence, assessing the affinity spectrum of a person’s antigen-specific B cell repertoire would provide valuable information on their immune competence. Currently, cloning and expression of large numbers of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) per test subject would be required to gain such insights, but this is impractical in the context of large-scale immune monitoring efforts. Here, we introduce a variant of the B cell ImmunoSpot assay that can simultaneously assess the relative affinity distribution of hundreds of individual B cells in a test sample. Additionally, we also demonstrated its suitability for high-throughput assay workflows that require minimal labor and exploit machine-assisted image analysis software tools. Specifically, as proof of principle, we verified that B cell hybridomas secreting mAbs of different affinities for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein could readily be distinguished through simple titration of the soluble antigen detection probe. Furthermore, using this assay methodology we provide evidence for affinity maturation within the Spike-specific memory B cell repertoire following a second COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Collectively, we introduce a high-throughput suitable and scalable methodology with the potential of filling a major gap in the immune monitoring field: characterizing the affinity distribution of antigen-specific B cells in large study cohorts.
Full text 2,382 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The biological efficacy of an antibody is largely defined by its affinity. Moreover, because the binding affinity of an antibody can span orders of magnitude, each antigen-specific B cell would not be expected to contribute equally to humoral defense: high-affinity antibodies are likely to possess increased potency in comparison to those with lower affinities. Hence, assessing the affinity spectrum of a person’s antigen-specific B cell repertoire would provide valuable information on their immune competence. Currently, cloning and expression of large numbers of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) per test subject would be required to gain such insights, but this is impractical in the context of large-scale immune monitoring efforts. Here, we introduce a variant of the B cell ImmunoSpot assay that can simultaneously assess the relative affinity distribution of hundreds of individual B cells in a test sample. Additionally, we also demonstrated its suitability for high-throughput assay workflows that require minimal labor and exploit machine-assisted image analysis software tools. Specifically, as proof of principle, we verified that B cell hybridomas secreting mAbs of different affinities for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein could readily be distinguished through simple titration of the soluble antigen detection probe. Furthermore, using this assay methodology we provide evidence for affinity maturation within the Spike-specific memory B cell repertoire following a second COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Collectively, we introduce a high-throughput suitable and scalable methodology with the potential of filling a major gap in the immune monitoring field: characterizing the affinity distribution of antigen-specific B cells in large study cohorts. Competing Interest Statement P.V.L. is Founder, President, and CEO of CTL, a company that specializes in immune monitoring by ImmunoSpot. M.T.L. is a co-founder and CSO of CTL. N.B., L.Y., and G.A.K. are employees of CTL. The mouse anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike mAbs, developed by G.A.S., were filed with the Innovation Gateway at the University of Georgia and are currently licensed for distribution by Kerafast. M.J.H. and S.K. declare no conflict of interest. CTL directed the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and the writing of this article, and made the decision to submit it for publication.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0