Cases
A 36-year-old woman with a six-year history of primary infertility presented to our fertility center. She reported regular menstrual cycles and had previously undergone two laparoscopic surgeries for Grade IV endometriosis. Her anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level was measured at 0.5 ng/mL (reference range: 1.0-4.0 ng/mL), indicating diminished ovarian reserve. The rest of her endocrine profile was within normal limits, except for an elevated prolactin level. Her husband's semen analysis was normal. Ultrasonography performed on day 2 of her menstrual cycle revealed five antral follicles in the right ovary and three in the left ovary. The EMT on day 2 was 4.8 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm). She was prescribed cabergoline 0.25 mg weekly and planned for a short antagonist cycle of ART.
She commenced treatment with follitropin alfa 300 IU daily starting from day 2 of the menstrual cycle, as shown in Table 1 . On day 7 of the ART cycle, cetrorelix acetate 0.25 mg was added to prevent premature ovulation. On day 10, ultrasonography showed an EMT of 6 mm. The patient was then given menotropins (a combination of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) 225 IU and luteinizing hormone (LH) 225 IU), and cetrorelix acetate was continued. On day 12, ultrasonography showed a very thin endometrial lining of 5.5 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm). Triggering was performed on the same night, and egg retrieval occurred 36 hours later. Three embryos of grade AB were successfully frozen (Tables 1 , 2 ).
OPU: oocyte pick-up; ART: assisted reproductive technology; EMT: endometrial thickness; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone.
EMT: endometrial thickness; FET: frozen embryo transfer; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone.
For the subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, the patient was started on estradiol valerate 4 mg three times daily, both orally and vaginally, due to thin endometrium noted on day 2. However, by day 9, the endometrial lining was only 4.3 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm), with fluid present in the uterine cavity. The cycle was cancelled due to persistent thin endometrium and intrauterine fluid. A hysteroscopy was performed and revealed a normal endometrium, as shown in Figure 1 . Similar ultrasound findings were seen after three months, and the patient was started on estrogen patches (100 mcg every three days) and letrozole 5 mg for seven days. This cycle was also cancelled due to persistent intrauterine fluid and thin endometrium.
In the subsequent cycle, the patient was administered gonadotropins (FSH 75 IU and LH 75 IU) from day 3. Cetrotelix acetate 0.25 mg was started on day 12. By day 12, the EMT was 5.5 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm). Choriogonadotropin alfa was administered on day 15, followed by single embryo transfer of grade AB on day 22, with an EMT of 5.7 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm) at the time of transfer (Figure 2 ). The patient was started on estradiol valerate 2 mg twice daily and progesterone soft gel capsules twice daily. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measured on day 31 was positive, with a value of 136.9 mIU/mL (reference range: <5 mIU/mL). She subsequently delivered a healthy female baby weighing 3.1 kg at 37 weeks of gestation.
EMT: endometrial thickness.
Intro
The effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) largely relies on the implantation of a genetically healthy embryo into a receptive endometrium [ 1 ]. It is suggested that two-thirds of implantation failures are due to poor endometrial receptivity and disrupted communication between the embryo and the endometrium [ 2 ]. Pregnancy rates tend to rise as endometrial thickness (EMT) increases from 8 to 14 mm [ 3 ]. An EMT of less than 7 mm during the implantation window (typically between days 19 and 23 of the menstrual cycle), as observed on ultrasound, is generally classified as a thin endometrium.
Research indicates that embryo implantation and live birth rates improve when the EMT exceeds 8 mm on the day of trigger shot administration [ 4 ]. However, the minimum EMT associated with a successful full-term live birth in assisted reproduction is reported to be 3.5 mm [ 5 ]. The endometrium should be assessed using a transvaginal probe with the bladder empty. This method places the transducer closer to the endometrium and employs a higher frequency (≥5 to 8 MHz). This results in enhanced resolution and visualization, though it reduces penetration depth. The EMT should be measured in the sagittal plane or long axis, taking the measurement from the thickest echogenic area from one stratum basalis interface across the endometrial canal to the opposite stratum basalis interface. It is important not to include the surrounding inner myometrial lucency in this measurement [ 6 ].
A persistently thin endometrium is often linked to past extensive curettage, infections, Asherman's syndrome, or uterine irradiation [ 7 ]. Efforts to enhance overall endometrial growth and pattern have not yet been validated. Various treatments have been attempted, including operative hysteroscopy, intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and methods to improve endometrial blood supply such as aspirin, vitamin E, pentoxifylline, L-arginine, or sildenafil. Regenerative medicine approaches have also been explored, and certain studies have suggested that intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can enhance EMT [ 8 ]. However, none of these methods have been shown to consistently improve cases of thin endometrium.
Discussion
Managing a thin endometrium is a frequent challenge for patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Clinical practice typically involves measuring EMT. Despite conflicting study results and a lack of consensus on the correlation between EMT and IVF outcomes, an EMT of less than 7 mm is generally considered unfavorable. The EMT is measured in the sagittal plane or long axis, taking the measurement from the thickest echogenic area from one stratum basalis interface across the endometrial canal to the opposite stratum basalis interface, as shown in Figure 3 .
EMT: endomterial thickness.
Recent studies indicate that EMT on the day of hCG trigger can influence pregnancy outcomes, with a thin endometrium posing a clinical challenge [ 9 ]. To address this, various strategies have been employed in clinical practice to enhance endometrial growth. These strategies include the administration of estrogen, low-dose aspirin, vitamin E, vaginal sildenafil citrate, and intrauterine perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). These methods have not shown consistent improvement in EMT. For example, a 2024 case report by Huang et al. noted that EMT did not significantly increase with the use of aspirin. However, the study documented a successful pregnancy with an EMT of 3.8 mm [ 10 ]. This suggests that even with a thin endometrium, appropriate interventions can lead to successful pregnancies. Agrawal et al. reported another case in 2022 where a successful pregnancy was achieved in a patient with a persistently thin endometrium [ 11 ]. For patients with a thin endometrium, it is important to focus not only on increasing thickness but also on improving endometrial blood supply and morphology to enhance pregnancy rates [ 10 ].
In a 2013 study by Chen and Chen, three patients who previously failed to develop an EMT of at least 6 mm over at least three cycles, including natural cycles, extended estrogen treatment cycles with aspirin, or letrozole stimulation cycles, achieved significant endometrial growth and successfully conceived following the administration of 20 mg of tamoxifen daily for five days [ 12 ].
In our case report, we achieved successful pregnancy with an EMT of 5.7 mm (reference range: 7-8 mm). Our patient was stimulated with gonadotropins for 14 days, followed by trigger with choriogonadotropin alfa 250 mcg on the 15th day. Her EMT remained in the range of 5-6.0 mm. Clinicians often change stimulation medications when faced with a thin endometrium. A meta-analysis by Weiss et al. found that clomiphene and letrozole were both linked to a thinner endometrium compared to gonadotropins in ovarian stimulation cycles [ 13 ]. When a clinician encounters a persistently thin endometrium, it is important to evaluate the patient's condition and preferences. Clinicians should make every effort to employ a variety of methods to address the issue. It is important to note that for patients with a thin endometrium, the potential to achieve a thicker endometrium in future ovarian stimulation cycles is uncertain.
Furthermore, in cases of patients with a thin endometrium, it is recommended to opt for a frozen cycle instead of a fresh transfer. This approach allows for a more detailed assessment of the endometrium and offers the advantage of postponing the transfer if the lining has not developed adequately [ 14 ]. Moreover, for women over 35 years of age, FETs have shown significantly higher rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births compared to fresh embryo transfers [ 15 ].
Conclusions
This case highlights the challenges and successful outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in a patient with primary infertility and severe endometriosis. Despite multiple cycles complicated by a persistently thin endometrium and intrauterine fluid, the use of gonadotropins, estrogen therapy, and careful monitoring resulted in a successful pregnancy and delivery. It is important to conduct an endometrial assessment prior to the index cycle in such cases, as young patients may still have a reasonable chance of implantation even with a thin endometrium. For those preparing for a FET, the status of the endometrium during the stimulation cycle should be carefully considered. Physicians must weigh the potential outcomes of proceeding with treatment against the possibility of exploring alternative approaches for patients with a thin endometrium. Currently, there is limited evidence supporting specific protocols or adjuvants that can significantly enhance pregnancy outcomes for these patients. Further research is needed to establish effective strategies for managing thin endometrium in assisted reproduction.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.