Role of robotic surgery in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis
review
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) may offer technical advantages over standard laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) surgery, but randomized trials are needed to demonstrate clinical benefits.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Standard laparoscopy (SL) is the gold standard for endometriosis surgery including deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DIE laparoscopic surgery can require complex surgical procedures performed by multidisciplinary surgical team. Robotic assisted laparoscopy (RAL) could offer technical advantages such as 3D vision, tremor filtration and better surgical ergonomy. RAL would be able to improve surgical performances compared to SL, decrease perioperative morbidity and decrease the risk of laparo-conversion. For these reasons, DIE could be one of the best indications for RAL in gynecologic surgery. Demonstrating the feasibility of RAL for DIE surgery, few series of cases have been already published. None of them have demonstrated differences in surgical outcomes. One randomized control trial comparing SL to RAL would be mandatory in order to define potential benefits of RAL for DIE surgery.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-20T06:14:21.026120+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:19.813018+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine