Full text
7,373 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Out of Sight, Out of Study: Technological Barriers to Cryptic Mammal Research and Conservation | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 February 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Out of Sight, Out of Study: Technological Barriers to Cryptic Mammal Research and Conservation Authors : Alexandria Cosby 0009-0005-8750-0992 [email protected] , Quinn Webber , and Jaustin Dufour Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173935770.07888923/v1 291 views 128 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Cryptic species, characterized by their elusive behaviours and/or morphological similarities to other taxa, are underrepresented in global conservation efforts, often due to challenges in detection and monitoring. These species are frequently classified as data deficient, limiting our understanding of their population dynamics, ecological roles, and vulnerabilities to threats such as habitat loss and climate change. This knowledge gap is exacerbated by the inadequacy of traditional monitoring methods, which rely on direct observation or morphological analysis that often fail to address the unique challenges posed by cryptic taxa. Staple technologies, including environmental DNA, acoustic monitoring, and telemetry, have advanced efforts to study these species. However, their application is hindered by logistical barriers, such as high costs and resource demands, as well as ethical concerns surrounding invasive techniques and inequitable researcher access in biodiversity-rich but economically constrained regions, thus influencing the credibility and replicability of research. Furthermore, many of these tools have been designed for larger, more conspicuous species, perpetuating biases in global conservation science. This review highlights the persistent gaps in knowledge about cryptic species and critiques the limitations of common methodologies. It underscores the need for integrative, multidisciplinary approaches tailored to the behavioural and ecological complexities of these species. By addressing inequities in access to technology, fostering collaborative research frameworks, and advocating for open-source innovation, the scientific community can work toward more inclusive and effective conservation strategies. Ultimately, this commentary aims to provoke critical reflection on the ethical and logistical challenges of cryptic species monitoring, calling for a shift toward scalable, accessible, and species-appropriate solutions. Bridging these gaps is not only vital for advancing ecological understanding but also for safeguarding some of the planet’s most vulnerable and enigmatic species before they are lost to extinction. Supplementary Material File (out of site, out of study_anonymous.docx) Download 483.11 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 12 February 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords conservation cryptic species scientific accessibility technological limitations wildlife monitoring Authors Affiliations Alexandria Cosby 0009-0005-8750-0992 [email protected] University of Guelph View all articles by this author Quinn Webber University of Guelph View all articles by this author Jaustin Dufour Independent View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 291 views 128 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Alexandria Cosby, Quinn Webber, Jaustin Dufour. Out of Sight, Out of Study: Technological Barriers to Cryptic Mammal Research and Conservation. Authorea . 12 February 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173935770.07888923/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.173935770.07888923/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ff50dcccf874807',t:'MTc3OTM4MTk1MQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.