Do shifts in honeybee crop microbiota enable ethanol accumulation? A comparative analysis of caged and foraging bees

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,649 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Honeybees encounter low environmental doses of ethanol, primarily through fermenting nectar, which can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on their functioning. Yet, ethanol traces can also be detected in the crop of caged bees with no access to environmental food sources. This raises the possibility that endogenous ethanol accumulation could occur under restricted conditions, with microbial contributions as a potential mechanism. The crop microbiota, although less diverse than that in other gut segments, plays important roles in food fermentation and pathogen defense. We hypothesized that captivity-induced shifts in crop microbiota may facilitate fermentation, resulting in measurable ethanol. To test this, we compared the crop contents of naturally foraging hive bees and caged bees reared without access to the natural environment. Ethanol levels were low in both groups and did not differ significantly, but non-zero measurements were more frequently observed in caged bees. Microbial community structure differed strongly in α- and β-diversity. Caged bees showed reduced abundance of nectar-associated genera (e.g., Apilactobacillus) and an increase in genera that include known ethanol-producing strains, such as Gilliamella and Bifidobacterium. While we did not directly assess metabolic activity, our results suggest that captivity alters microbial communities in ways that may influence ethanol levels. This raises broader questions about how microbe-host interactions modulate host phenotypes under different environmental conditions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0