Young children rely on visual information to process degraded speech: Evidence from behavioural and neuroimaging measures

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
Full text 1,949 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Young children acquire language in environments where speech is often acoustically degraded, yet little is known about how developing brains adapt to reduced speech intelligibility. Using a combination of eye-tracking and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we investigated young children’s attentional allocation to a speaking face at varying levels of speech intelligibility and the brain activity supporting this behaviour during development. Infants (8–10 months) and toddlers (27–30 months) viewed videos of a speaker in three conditions: producing clear speech, spectrally degraded (vocoded) speech, and silent (audio muted) speech. Visual attention to the speaker’s mouth increased when speech was degraded relative to clear speech in both age groups, indicating an early-emerging compensatory strategy. However, this shared behavioural response was supported by brain activity that differed by age. Degraded speech elicited greater recruitment of prefrontal regions associated with effortful listening, particularly in infants, whereas toddlers showed stronger engagement of posterior temporal regions implicated in audiovisual integration. In response to silent speech, there was no evidence for increased visual attention to the mouth compared to the clear speech condition, but there was reduced temporal activation and increased prefrontal brain responses, especially in infants. Together, these findings suggest that experience with audiovisual correspondences and linguistic maturity contribute to a more efficient processing of speech, particularly relevant when speech is degraded. By combining behavioural and neuroimaging measures, this study advances mechanistic accounts of audiovisual speech processing and provides insights relevant to populations experiencing spectrally degraded input, such as children using cochlear implants. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0