The zinc finger protein560(ZNF560) functions as a novel oncogenic gene in osteosarcoma

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 112,858 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
The zinc finger protein560(ZNF560) functions as a novel oncogenic gene in osteosarcoma | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article The zinc finger protein560(ZNF560) functions as a novel oncogenic gene in osteosarcoma Xiong Dong, Guanhua Xu, Hongxiang Hong, Jinlong Zhang, Zhiming Cui, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 02 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Abnormal expression of Zinc finger (ZNF) genes is commonly observed in osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent malignant bone tumor in children and teenagers. This project focused on the role of ZNF560 in the progress of OS. Methods The published datasets including TCGA-SARC and GSE99671 was utilized to screen out the abnormal expression of ZNF560 and associated gene patterns in sarcoma and OS tissues. Prognosis value of ZNF560 was identified in TCGA-SARC and OS cohorts. In order to manipulate ZNF560 expression in HOS and MG63 osteosarcoma (OS) cells, genetic strategies such as shRNA constructs were utilized. The expression patterns of ZNF560 were analyzed through techniques such as immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and qRT-PCR. Results By analyzing data from both the GEO and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, increased expression of ZNF560 in OS tissues was verified, which was significantly associated with poorer outcomes in osteosarcoma patients both in TCGA-SARC and our own OS cohorts. Additionally, downregulation of ZNF560 resulted in decreased cell viability, fewer colonies, and induced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Moreover, ZNF560 was found to be essential for migration of human osteosarcoma HOS and MG63 cells. Conclusion Collectively, these findings suggest that ZNF560 has the potential to serve as a predictive biomarker for osteosarcoma. Biological sciences/Cancer Biological sciences/Cell biology Osteosarcoma ZNF560 biomarker tumorigenesis prognosis Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction Osteosarcoma, a malignant bone tumor, poses a significant threat to the lives of teenagers, children, and individuals over 60 years old ( 1 ). Substantial advancements have been made in the diagnosis and management of osteosarcoma in recent decades ( 2 ). The implementation of multi-agent chemotherapy several decades ago resulted in a significant improvement in the 5-year event-free survival rate for localized high-grade osteosarcoma, increasing it from less than 20% to approximately 60% ( 3 ). However, chemotherapy has altered the timing, distribution, and incidence of metastases, yet it has not yielded a substantial impact on patient survival, as only 20 to 30% of patients with synchronous metastases and 30–40% of those with metachronous metastases achieve a cure ( 4 – 7 ). Furthermore, the high degree of heterogeneity observed in osteosarcoma renders therapy even more problematic, which poses challenges to investigators ( 8 ). Despite the identification of certain prognostic biomarkers, accurately predicting the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients remains challenging. Hence, the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, along with the investigation of potential therapeutic targets, is imperative for the efficacious management of osteosarcoma. The human genome contains a vast family of regulatory proteins, known as zinc finger (ZNF) protein genes, which are characterized by their zinc ion–binding finger-like domain ( 9 ). These proteins exhibit a multitude of functions in diverse cellular processes, encompassing transcriptional regulation, mRNA stability, and protein degradation, through their interactions with RNA, DNA, or proteins (10、11). Recent research has shown that ZNF proteins are also involved in oncogenesis and tumor progression( 12 – 15 ), and abnormal expressions of ZNF proteins or genes have been found in malignant tumors, making them potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. For instance, the expression level of ZNF233 exhibited correlations with the grade, stage, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This suggests that ZNF233 has the potential to be developed as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC ( 16 ). ZNF655 demonstrated a notable role in promoting the interaction between E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) and the promoter region of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1). Furthermore, the upregulation of ZNF655 expression in pancreatic cancer cells was attenuated upon suppression of CDK1. These discoveries elucidate the contributory function of ZNF655 in pancreatic cancer via its association with CDK1, thereby sparking interest in its prospective utilization as a promising therapeutic target in clinical settings ( 17 ). ZNF331 serves crucial roles as a newly identified functional tumor-suppressor gene in inhibiting the development of gastric cancer. Suppression of ZNF331 resulted in an elevation of cell viability and enhanced colony formation ability in the gastric cancer cell line MKN45 ( 18 ). A study found that mutations observed in ZNF560 demonstrated a notable positive correlation with the survival of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) ( 19 ). An alternative study indicated that alterations in ZNF560 expression resulting from chronic hypoxia play a crucial role in the progression of prostate cancer ( 20 ). Furthermore, ZNF560 was identified as a high-risk gene associated with unfavorable outcomes in individuals diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ( 21 ). These findings indicate a potential connection between ZNF560 and the development of tumors. Through an analysis of the GEO and TCGA databases, we identified ZNF560 as a gene associated with osteosarcoma, exhibiting distinct expression patterns in osteosarcoma tissues compared to normal tissues. The objective of this study was to comprehend the functional role of ZNF560 in osteosarcoma and assess its diagnostic and prognostic significance. Materials and Methods In Silico Data Collection and Preprocessing UALCAN ( http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/ , version 08/16/2022), a comprehensive platform designed to facilitate gene expression and survival analyses across various cancers within the TCGA database, was employed to scrutinize the expression levels of ZNF560 in multiple cancer types, with a particular focus on sarcoma. The abbreviation of various cancers included in TCGA was shown in Table 1 . Gene expression profiling datasets (GSE99671) were procured from the GEO database ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE99671 ), consisting of total RNA sequencing data from 36 fresh-frozen samples (18 tumoral bone samples and 18 non-tumoral paired samples) matching in pairs for each osteosarcoma patient [PMID: 29250102] Stringent statistical criteria, including a p-value < 0.05 and |fold change (FC)| ≥ 1.5, were applied along with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjustments to balance the identification of statistically significant genes while mitigating false positives.The ZNF560-low and ZNF560‐high groups were stratified using median values of the ZNF560 transcript in the RNAseq data from TCGA. Stringent thresholds (p < 0.01 and |fold change (FC)| ≥ 2) were employed to define differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Data visualization encompassed the creation of volcano plots and heatmaps utilizing R 4.3.1. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were generated, displaying hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and log‐rank p-values, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) methodology, providing a computational framework to investigate changes in particular biological processes and pathways within a given dataset, was employed with the software (v4.3.2 for Windows). Gene expression profiles of sarcoma patients were subjected to analysis using the "c2.cp.kegg.v2023.1.Hs.symbols.gmt" gene set from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB 2023.1), with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05. Table 1 Abbreviations of various cancers in TCGA databse Bladder Cancer BLCA Breast Cancer BRCA Cervical Cancer CESC Bile Duct Cancer CHOL Colon Cancer COAD Esophageal Cancer ESCA Glioblastoma GBM Head and Neck Cancer HNSC Kidney Chromophobe KICH Kidney Clear Cell Carcinoma KIRC Kidney Papillary Cell Carcinoma KIRP Liver Cancer LIHC Lung Adenocarcinoma LUAD Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma LUSC Pancreatic Cancer PAAD Pheochromocytoma & Paraganglioma PCPG Prostate Cancer PRAD Rectal Cancer READ Sarcoma SARC Melanoma SKCM Stomach Cancer STAD Thyroid Cancer THCA Thymoma (THYM) THYM Endometrioid Cancer UCEC Osteosarcoma tissues collection Totally 49 human osteosarcoma tissue samples were procured from patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty and orthopedic surgery for osteosarcoma at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, after obtaining approval from the local Institutional Review Board (P20230224-025). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines. Prior to enrollment, all participants provided written informed consent. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was conducted on formalin-fixed tissues. The samples were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in ethanol, and subjected to 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity and minimize nonspecific binding. Tissues were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies targeting ZNF560 (1:200 dilution, Biorbyt, USA, orb26621), followed by incubation with a secondary antibody, HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200 dilution, Beyotime, A0208), at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and diaminobenzidine, hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. The proportion of positively stained cells, categorized by score for both nuclear and cytoplasmic areas, was evaluated to the nearest 5% within a standardized field of five photomicrographs per sample (across 26 OSA samples) for each antibody. H-scores were determined with the formula: H-score = [1 × (% cells 1+) + 2 × (% cells 2+) + 3 × (% cells 3+)]. Each specimen's cytoplasmic, nuclear, and total H-scores (ranging from 0 to 300) were computed for each relevant marker. An initial double-blinded researcher performed the H-score calculations and set the scoring criteria. Subsequently, a second researcher reviewed a random 10% of the samples to verify consistency and accuracy, achieving an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) exceeding 90% for all evaluated proteins. Tissue samples with staining intensity scores equal to or higher than the median values of immunohistochemistry (IHC) were classified as having high expression of ZNF560, while those with lower scores were categorized as exhibiting low expression. Cell lines and cell culture conditions Human OS cells lines including HOS and MG63 were procured from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(China). Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (GIBCO, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO, USA), and maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO 2 . Lentivirus transfection and cell infection To suppress the activity of ZNF560, cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting the human ZNF560 gene (Gene ID: 147741), along with pGCSIL-green fluorescent protein (GFP) for assessing transduction efficiency. Three shRNAs were synthesized to target specific interference sequences within ZNF560: shZNF560-1 (5’- GCTCATATCTTACCAAACATT-3’), shZNF560-2 (5’- CCGTCAGGCTTTCTTGAACAT-3’), and shZNF560-3 (5’- GTACATCCTCAGGTGTTATTG − 3’). The shRNA exhibiting the most potent interference effect on ZNF560 expression was individually selected. Lentivirus lacking the shRNA insert served as a control. HOS and MG63 cells were both seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 10 5 cells per well and transduced with shRNA-ZNF560 (5 × 10 8 TU/mL) or shRNA-NC lentivirus (7 × 10 8 TU/mL). After 72 hours of transduction, cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope and subsequently subjected to puromycin selection. Five days after infection, the downregulation of ZNF560 was confirmed via qRT-PCR analysis. RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR) Total RNA was extracted from HOS and MG63 cells using TRIzol total RNA reagent (Pufei Biotech, China). Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized according to the instructions of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, USA). The primers targeting ZNF560 were synthesized by Gene Chem Co.Ltd. (China), with GAPDH serving as a reference gene. The primer sequences were as follows: GAPDH forward, 5’-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3’, and reverse, 5’-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3’; ZNF560 forward, 5’- CCTGAAATGGTTGAATGGGTTAG-3’, and reverse, 5’- CCATCAGAGTCAGAAGGGAAAGT-3’;PCNA forward, 5’- GCGTGAACCTCACCAGTATGT-3’, and reverse, 5’- TCTTCGGCCCTTAGTGTAATGAT-3’; UBE2C forward, 5’- GACCTGAGGTATAAGCTCTCGC-3’, and reverse, 5’- CAGGGCAGACCACTTTTCCTT-3’; CDCA5 forward, 5’- AAAGCCCATCGTCTTAAAGAGG-3’, and reverse, 5’- GGGACGCTGTGTGTCTTGA-3’; CDK4 forward, 5’- TCAGCACAGTTCGTGAGGTG-3’, and reverse, 5’- GTCCATCAGCCGGACAACAT-3’; CDK6 forward, 5’- TCTTCATTCACACCGAGTAGTGC-3’, and reverse, 5’-TGAGGTTAGAGCCATCTGGAAA-3’.The reactions were performed using SYBR premix Ex Taq II (Takara Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Japan). Relative expression levels of ZNF560 were analyzed by normalizing to GAPDH. The amplification process was conducted with the following thermocycling protocol: an initial reverse transcription at 50˚C for 30 minutes, followed by a denaturation step at 95˚C for 15 minutes. This was succeeded by 45 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94˚C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55˚C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72˚C for 30 seconds. The relative mRNA expression of ZNF560 was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (2 −△△Ct and 10000/2 △Ct ) method. Western blotting (WB) assay HOS and MG63 cells were treated with RIPA buffer (Beyotime) to extract proteins, and the protein concentration was quantified using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime). A total of 20 µg of protein per well was loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). The membrane was then incubated overnight at 4°C with the respective primary antibodies (1:500, Invitrogen, USA, PA5-41224), followed by a 2-hour incubation with secondary antibodies at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence ECL kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with GAPDH utilized as the loading control. 3- (, )-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay and cell counting assay HOS and MG63 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 2000 cells per well. The MTT assay was utilized to assess cell viability for a duration of 5 days, and a growth curve was constructed to determine the cell proliferation rate. The GFP-expressing cells were detected using Celigo, and images were acquired to obtain cell counts, enabling the generation of a growth curve spanning 5 days. Analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis HOS and MG63 cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a volume of 2 mL per well for a period of 5 days. To analyze apoptosis, the cells were first washed using pre-cooled D-hanks (pH = 7.2 ~ 7.4) followed by 1×binding buffer (eBioscience). After harvesting, the cellular pellets were reconstituted in 200 µL of 1× binding buffer. Subsequently, they were subjected to staining with 10 µL of Annexin V-APC (eBioscience) at room temperature under dark conditions for a duration of 15 minutes. Flow cytometry analysis (Millipore) was then performed to assess the samples. For cell cycle analysis, the cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes, followed by washing of the resulting cell pellets with pre-cooled PBS (pH = 7.2 ~ 7.4). To induce fixation, the cells were immersed in 70% ethanol for at least 1 hour. They were later stained with propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma) and subsequently analyzed using flow cytometry. Wound-healing assay HOS and MG63 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 4000 cells per well with a volume of 100 µL. The experimental protocol was conducted following the procedures described in a referenced literature. In order to mitigate the influence of cell proliferation on migration, the cells were cultured in a serum-deprived medium and subjected to a 1-hour treatment with mitomycin prior to the initiation of the wound-healing experiments. A straight-line incision was then generated across the cellular monolayer using a pipette tip. Subsequent to this, the cells underwent a PBS wash, followed by fixation in 3.7% paraformaldehyde (Corning) for 15 minutes and staining with 1% crystal violet (Corning) for 10 minutes. Microscopic imaging was employed to capture cell visuals, and the measurement of the distance (in µm) between the incisions at 0 hours and 24 hours was conducted using Image J software (National Institutes of Health). Transwell assay HOS and MG63 cell lines were cultured at a density of 80,000 cells per well in Transwell chambers (24-well format, 8-mm pore size, Corning) and maintained for a period of 24 hours at a temperature of 37°C. The inner compartment of the Transwell chambers contained 100 µL of cell suspension, while the outer compartment was supplemented with 500 µL of DMEM medium containing 30% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After the 24-hour incubation period, non-invasive cells residing in the upper chamber were carefully eliminated, and the cells adhering to the polycarbonate membrane were fixed using 4% pre-cooled paraformaldehyde for a duration of 30 minutes. Following fixation, the cells were subjected to staining with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 20 minutes at ambient room temperature. Subsequently, high-resolution images of the cells were acquired from five randomly selected microscopic fields using a microscope with a magnification of 200×. Clone Formation Experiment Following the transfection of cells, the cell suspensions were transferred to 1.5mL Eppendorf tubes, thoroughly mixed and diluted, and subsequently seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 20,000 cells per well. The culture medium was refreshed every three days, and the cells were allowed to form clones over a period of approximately ten days. Subsequently, the culture medium was aspirated, and the cells were gently washed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for a duration of 15 minutes, followed by staining with 0.1% crystal violet for an additional 15 minutes. Finally, the cells were washed, air-dried, and subjected to photographic documentation to enumerate clonal cell clusters, followed by subsequent statistical analysis. Statistical analysis The data processing was performed with GraphPad 8.0.2 and figure arrangement was carried out with Adobe Illustrator 2022. Continuous variables were reported as the means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis for comparison among multiple groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc test. Each experiment was replicated at least three times to ensure reliability and reproducibility of the results. The significance level for all analyses was set at a P-value less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance. Results ZNF560 is highly expressed and is a poor prognostic factor in osteosarcoma Utilizing UALCAN for data mining of the TCGA database, we characterized the mRNA expression of ZNF560 across 24 tumor types in comparison with their respective normal controls. As depicted in Fig. 1 A, ZNF560 mRNA expression exhibited a significant elevation in various human solid tumors, notably in PRAD (Prostate adenocarcinoma), SARC (Sarcoma), THCA (Thyroid carcinoma), and THYM (Thymoma). Given the restricted availability of normal control samples within the SARC datasets, as 2 normal control and 260 sarcoma samples were included, the statistical significance of ZNF560 expression levels in comparison to both cancer and adjacent non-cancer samples is constrained. To address this limitation, we gathered data from the GSE99671 dataset, encompassing 18 tumoral osteosarcoma samples and 18 non-tumoral paired samples. Through differential gene analysis, we confirmed a total of 127 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with 110 being upregulated and 17 downregulated (Fig. 1 B, 1 C, and supplementary table 1 ). Notably, ZNF560 exhibited significant upregulation in osteosarcoma samples. Concurrently, integrating the prognostic data of sarcoma patients from TCGA, we conducted survival analysis, revealing a noteworthy association between elevated ZNF560 expression levels and unfavorable prognosis in individuals afflicted with osteosarcoma, particularly concerning overall survival (OS; p = 0.012; Fig. 1 D). To delve deeper into the association between the distinct expression patterns of ZNF560 and other genes, we categorized sarcoma patients from TCGA into high and low expression cohorts using the median ZNF560 expression as the threshold. Following this stratification, we proceeded with a comparative gene analysis between these two cohorts, revealing a total of 348 upregulated genes and 209 downregulated genes (Fig. 2 A, and supplementary table 2 ). A heatmap illustrating the top 30 highest expressed genes is depicted in Fig. 2 B, revealing that ZNF229, ZNF728, among others, exhibit similar expression patterns to ZNF560. Furthermore, employing Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) on the differential gene expression between these two groups, we discovered significant enrichments in signaling pathways related to cell cycle, cell cycle mitotic, cell cycle checkpoints, and DNA replication (Figure 2 C). These findings suggest a potential involvement of ZNF560 in cellular processes associated with the cell cycle and mitosis. Simultaneously, we gathered 49 osteosarcoma tissue specimens, which were utilized to construct tissue microarrays. ZNF560 was subjected to immunohistochemical staining, and positive scoring was conducted (Fig. 3 A). Based on the scoring results, the specimens were categorized into a high-expression group (24 cases) and a low-expression group (25 cases). We conducted a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to examine the relationship between the expression levels of ZNF560 (high and low) and the overall survival of osteosarcoma patients. The findings demonstrated a significant association, whereby an elevation in ZNF560 expression was correlated with a notable reduction in patient survival time. This observation suggests that a higher expression level of ZNF560 is indicative of a worse prognosis in individuals with osteosarcoma (Fig. 3 B). In summary, the elevated expression of ZNF560 is correlated with unfavorable outcomes in osteosarcoma. ZNF560 downregulation inhibits cell viability and the clone formation of osteosarcoma cells. Following the transfection of siRNA, we initially assessed the expression levels of ZNF560 in both HOS and MG63 cells. As depicted in Fig. 4 A and 4 B, a noticeable decrease in ZNF560 content was observed in cells transfected with si-ZNF560 compared to those transfected with scramble RNA, confirming the successful knockdown of ZNF560 expression. Furthermore, the results obtained from the MTT assay demonstrated a significant reduction in sarcoma cell viability upon downregulation of ZNF560(Fig. 4 C). Next, we detected the effect of ZNF560 downregulation on clone formation capability of sarcoma cells HOS and MG63. As is shown in Fig. 4 D and 4 E, upon downregulation of ZNF560, the number of colonies decreased markedly compared to the untreated control cells. Moreover, expression of PCNA, UBE2C, CDCA5, CDK4, and CDK6 mRNA were downregulated after silencing of ZNF560 (Fig. 4 F), supporting the inhibitory effects of ZNF560 on cell proliferation. Knockdown of ZNF560 has a potent effect to trigger cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases and to induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Recent studies focusing on cell cycle regulation have revealed the intricate and precise control mechanisms that govern cell cycle progression in normal cells. Any deviations from these well-defined checkpoints can result in aberrant cell proliferation and contribute to the development of cancer. Cancer cells are particularly prone to acquiring defects in these checkpoints, which ultimately leads to deregulation of the cell cycle and uncontrolled cell proliferation. In order to evaluate whether the knockdown of ZNF560 can inhibit cell cycle progression, cell cycle distribution of MG63 and HOS cells with/without ZNF560 knockdown was tested by flow cytometry(FCM). The flow cytometric analysis provided compelling evidence that the downregulation of ZNF560 induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases. This arrest was manifested by a notable accumulation of cells in the G2/M and S phases, accompanied by a concomitant decrease in the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phases. These findings unequivocally establish that the knockdown of ZNF560 elicits cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases in both HOS and MG63 cells(Fig. 5 A, 5 B). To estimate the percentage of apoptotic cell death upon the downregulation of ZNF560, the flow cytometric analyses were conducted in both HOS and MG63 cells for 48 hours. As is shown in Fig. 5 C and 5 D, downregulation of ZNF560 caused an increase in apoptotic population as compared to the untreated control cells. Collectively, these results demonstrated that the knockdown of ZNF560 has a potent effect to trigger cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases and to induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. ZNF560 was deemed indispensable in the migration of human osteosarcoma cells. Both HOS and MG63 cells were subjected to transduction with ZNF560-targeting siRNA. Subsequent wound healing and Transwell assays were repeatedly performed to assess the impact of ZNF560 knockdown on cell migration in both cell lines. As depicted in Fig. 6 A and 6 B, the effect of ZNF560 on cell migration was evaluated using a wound healing assay. Remarkably, the inhibition of ZNF560 resulted in a profound impairment of cell migration in both HOS and MG63 cells (Fig. 6 A, 6 B). Furthermore, the invasiveness of both HOS and MG63 cells was assessed through the Transwell assay to investigate the influence of ZNF560. It was observed that the proportion of ZNF560 knockdown cells that migrated was significantly lower compared to cells transfected with scramble RNA (Fig. 6 C, 6 D). Taken together, these findings unequivocally demonstrate that ZNF560 plays a crucial role in facilitating the motility of human osteosarcoma cells, specifically HOS and MG63 cells, and its knockdown substantially attenuates cell migration. These results strongly suggest the potential involvement of ZNF560 in the metastatic process of osteosarcoma. Discussion Osteosarcoma, an extensively heterogeneous malignant neoplasm predominantly localized within the metaphyseal regions of long bones, exhibits varying clinical outcomes even with standard treatment protocols ( 22 ). Multiple investigations have highlighted the constraints of the conventional AJCC staging system when it comes to accurately prognosticating outcomes for osteosarcoma patients ( 23 ).The TNM staging system primarily focuses on tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis as key determinants, while disregarding individualized parameters such as age ( 24 ).. Lately, the reevaluation of public database datasets through bioinformatic techniques has surfaced as a promising approach for uncovering prognostic biomarkers in malignancies. For instance, Wu et al. (2020) created an eight-gene prognostic model and nomogram to precisely forecast clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma ( 25 ). In this investigation, information pertaining to osteosarcoma patients was retrieved from the TCGA and GSE databases, and the differentially expressed genes as well as ZNF560 data were acquired and scrutinized to develop a prognostic risk model. An ideal diagnostic biomarker is anticipated to demonstrate exceptional sensitivity, enabling its detection in the majority of tumors, along with remarkable specificity, ensuring its absence in normal control samples. Nevertheless, it is uncommon for biomarkers to fulfill these criteria individually, necessitating the combination of molecular panels to attain a reliable and robust test ( 26 ). The newly discovered ZNF560, as presented in this paper, exhibits remarkable specificity and satisfactory sensitivity specifically in osteosarcoma, making it a valuable candidate as a cancer biomarker. Integrating ZNF560 with other biomarkers unique to osteosarcoma would enhance its effectiveness in the detection of cancer. In a recent investigation conducted by Xing Y et al, ZNF692 was unveiled as a novel oncogene with significant implications as a potential therapeutic target in colon adenocarcinoma ( 27 ). Limited research has been conducted on the potential oncogenic properties of ZNF560. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the ZNF family of regulatory proteins are widely distributed and recognized as one of the most prevalent families in this category ( 28 ). Examples include ZNF233, which exhibited associations with tumor grade, tumor stage, and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)( 16 ) and ZNF331 serves crucial roles as a newly discovered functional tumor-suppressor gene in suppressing gastric carcinogenesis ( 18 ). Considering the roles played by various zinc finger proteins, ZNF560 could potentially serve as a suitable subject for further examination. In this research, decreased expression of ZNF560 resulted in decreased cell viability, reduced colony numbers, and induced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Additionally, ZNF560 was necessary for HOS and MG63 human osteosarcoma cell migration. In aggregate, these findings suggest that the transcription factor ZNF560 demonstrates considerable potential as a promising prognostic biomarker and a prospective therapeutic target for individuals afflicted with osteosarcoma. Existing research has demonstrated that ZNFs facilitate tumorigenicity through the inhibition of cell cycle arrest. For instance, the aberrant overexpression of ZNF671 resulted in the imposition of S phase arrest in NPC cells through the upregulation of p21 and concurrent downregulation of cyclin D1 and c-myc, thereby manifesting its regulatory influence on cell cycle progression ( 29 ). As another illustration, the ectopic upregulation of ZNF23 led to a substantial elevation in p27kip-1 expression, exerting a suppressive effect on cellular proliferation and prompting cell cycle arrest specifically within the G1 phase( 30 ). The study conducted by L He and colleagues definitively established that the depletion of ZNF384 expression significantly impedes the proliferative capacity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells by inducing cell cycle arrest precisely at the critical checkpoint of G1/S phase transition ( 31 ). In this investigation, we demonstrated that the expression level of ZNF560 correlated with patient prognosis. Upon downregulating ZNF560 expression using shRNA in osteosarcoma cell lines, we observed cell cycle arrest at the G2/S transition in ZNF560 knockdown cells. Preliminary indications propose that ZNF560 might be involved in the transcriptional regulation of the cyclin family ( 31 ); nevertheless, additional elucidation is warranted to enhance our comprehension of this intricate association. In conclusion, ZNF560 appears to hold promise as a potential prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma. Nonetheless, it is crucial to address certain limitations within this study. Firstly, the evaluation of the ZNF protein gene-based signature predominantly relied on publicly available datasets, necessitating validation at both the mRNA and protein levels using our own cohort of osteosarcoma patients. Secondly, the utilization of certain bioinformatics tools, such as the Kaplan-Meier plotter, may possess restricted functionality without the incorporation of multivariable Cox regression analysis. Lastly, there is a lack of direct in vivo evidence to verify the mechanism of ZNF560 in the tumorigenicity of osteosarcoma. To address this, we aim to establish a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice model to further elucidate the role of ZNF560 in tumor formation. Declarations Acknowledgements Not applicable. Funding This work was supported by the Project of Nantong Municipal Health Commission(MS2022016)and Project of Jiangsu Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (MS2022090). Availability of data and materials All data generated and/or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Authors' contributions Xiong Dong was responsible for the literature search、experiment and discussion. ZhiMing Cui and Ziliang Yu made substantial contributions to conception and design, conducted a thorough review of the manuscript for its significant intellectual content and gave his approval to the final version. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Patient consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. References Zhao, X. et al. Osteosarcoma: a review of current and future therapeutic approaches. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 20(1): p. 24.[PMID: 33653371] (2021). Gaspar, N. et al. Recent advances in understanding osteosarcoma and emerging therapies. Faculty Reviews, 9: p. 18.[PMID: 33659950] (2020). Smeland, S. et al. Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort. Eur. J. Cancer . 109 , 36–50 (2019). [PMID: 30685685]. Marec-Berard, P. et al. A multicentric randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating high-dose thiotepa as adjuvant treatment to standard chemotherapy in patients with resectable relapsed osteosarcoma. Eur. J. Cancer . 125 , 58–68 (2020). [PMID: 31838406]. Italiano, A. et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21 (3), 446–455 (2020). [PMID: 32078813]. Boye, K. et al. Pembrolizumab in advanced osteosarcoma: results of a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 70 (9), 2617–2624 (2021). [PMID: 33580363]. Qayed, M. et al. A phase I study of sirolimus in combination with metronomic therapy (CHOAnome) in children with recurrent or refractory solid and brain tumors. Pediatr. Blood Cancer , 67 (4): p. (2020). e28134.[PMID: 31876107]. Garcia-Ortega, D. Y. et al. An overview of resistance to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma and future perspectives. Cancer Drug Resistance, 5(2): pp. 762 – 93.[PMID: 36176756] (2022). Li, X. et al. Structures and biological functions of zinc finger proteins and their roles in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomark. Res. , 10 (1): p. (2022). 2.[PMID: 35000617]. Bu, S. et al. Zinc Finger Proteins in Neuro-Related Diseases Progression. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15: p. 760567.[PMID: 34867169] (2021). Cassandri, M. et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discovery, 3(1): p. 17071.[PMID: 29152378] (2017). Jen, J. & Wang, Y. Zinc finger proteins in cancer progression. Journal of Biomedical Science, 23(1): p. 53.[PMID: 27411336] (2016). Ye, Q., Liu, J. & Xie, K. Zinc finger proteins and regulation of the hallmarks of cancer. Histology and histopathology, 34(10): p. 1097.[PMID: 31045237] (2019). Liu, S. et al. Zinc Finger Proteins in the War on Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Potential. Cells, 12(9): p. 1314.[PMID: 37174714] (2023). Wang, S. & Liu, R. Insights into the pleiotropic roles of ZNF703 in cancer. Heliyon , 9 (9): p. (2023). e20140.[PMID: 37810156]. Xie, W. et al. Knockdown of ZNF233 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Gene, 679: pp. 179–185.[PMID: 30179682] (2018). Shao, Z. et al. ZNF655 accelerates progression of pancreatic cancer by promoting the binding of E2F1 and CDK1. Oncogenesis . 11 (1), 44 (2022). [PMID: 35927248]. Yu, J. et al. Zinc-finger protein 331, a novel putative tumor suppressor, suppresses growth and invasiveness of gastric cancer. Oncogene . 32 (3), 307–317 (2013). [PMID: 22370639]. Cho, H. et al. Association of specific gene mutations derived from machine learning with survival in lung adenocarcinoma. PLOS ONE , 13 (11): p. (2018). e0207204.[PMID: 30419062]. Cameron, S. et al. Chronic hypoxia favours adoption to a castration-resistant cell state in prostate cancer. Oncogene, 42(21): pp. 1693–1703.[PMID: 37020039] (2023). Wang, J. et al. Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Risk-Scoring Model Based on Ferroptosis-Associated Cluster in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Front. Cell. Dev. Biology . 9 , 800267 (2022). [PMID: 35127715]. Beird, H. C. et al. Osteosarcoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 8(1): p. 77.[PMID: 36481668] (2022). Kim, M. S. et al. Prognostic nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgery for AJCC stage II extremity osteosarcoma. Ann. Oncol. 20 (5), 955–960 (2009). [PMID: 19153123]. Balachandran, V. P. et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. , 16 (4): p. (2015). e173-e180.[PMID: 25846097]. Wu, G. & Zhang, M. A novel risk score model based on eight genes and a nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer . 20 (1), 456 (2020). [PMID: 32448271]. Ransohoff, D. F. Developing Molecular Biomarkers for Cancer. Science, 299(5613): pp. 1679–1680.[PMID: 12637728] (2003). Xing, Y. et al. ZNF692 promotes colon adenocarcinoma cell growth and metastasis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 54 (5), 1691–1703 (2019). [PMID: 30816443]. Zhu, L. et al. The diagnostic significance of the ZNF gene family in pancreatic cancer: a bioinformatics and experimental study. Frontiers in Genetics, 14: p. 1089023.[PMID: 37396042] (2023). Zhang, J. et al. Epigenetic mediated zinc finger protein 671 downregulation promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by inhibiting cell cycle arrest. J. Experimental Clin. Cancer Res. , 36 (1): p. (2017). 147.[PMID: 29052525]. Huang, C. et al. Characterization of ZNF23, a KRAB-containing protein that is downregulated in human cancers and inhibits cell cycle progression. Exp. Cell Res. 313 (2), 254–263 (2007). [PMID: 17137575]. He, L. et al. Overexpression of zinc finger protein 384 (ZNF 384), a poor prognostic predictor, promotes cell growth by upregulating the expression of Cyclin D1 in Hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. , 10 (6): p. (2019). 444.[PMID: 31168049]. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryInfoFile.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 02 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 14 Oct, 2024 Reviews received at journal 11 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Sep, 2024 Reviews received at journal 27 Sep, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 17 Sep, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 11 Sep, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 11 Sep, 2024 Editor invited by journal 11 Sep, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 10 Sep, 2024 First submitted to journal 22 Aug, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4956121","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":365837989,"identity":"5f0fa6ff-ea90-4353-8ec2-dc5b93230e64","order_by":0,"name":"Xiong Dong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiong","middleName":"","lastName":"Dong","suffix":""},{"id":365837990,"identity":"1cb671dc-25dd-48f8-8697-b87f24c22aca","order_by":1,"name":"Guanhua Xu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Guanhua","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":365837991,"identity":"eca32058-fc2d-4386-8d39-d7828f0da621","order_by":2,"name":"Hongxiang Hong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hongxiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Hong","suffix":""},{"id":365837992,"identity":"83ff2631-5b06-4ca1-8c47-3fa85ea2c290","order_by":3,"name":"Jinlong Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jinlong","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":365837993,"identity":"66bea541-e569-487d-874e-576641aa71be","order_by":4,"name":"Zhiming Cui","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhiming","middleName":"","lastName":"Cui","suffix":""},{"id":365837994,"identity":"5084f25e-6fca-43dc-9bf8-d1e26b409131","order_by":5,"name":"ZiLiang Yu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"ZiLiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Yu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-22 07:48:25","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79298-y","type":"published","date":"2025-01-02T15:57:49+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":68213837,"identity":"61da1de3-cef7-44a4-b601-002a7dc6d461","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:30:38","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2507128,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eZNF560 was highly expressed and was a prognostic factor for poor outcomes in osteosarcoma. \u003c/strong\u003e(A). ZNF560 mRNA levels across TCGA tumors compared with normal tissue samples, determined using the UALCAN database. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from GSE99671 dataset. The horizontal axis represents the log2 (fold change) and the vertical axis represents the-log10 (P-value). Red dot indicates genes with high levels of expression (110), blue indicates genes with low levels of expression (17), and gray indicates genes with no differential expression based on the criteria of P value \u0026lt; 0.05 and |log2 (fold change)|\u0026gt; 1.5.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(C). Heat map of top differentially expressed genes from GSE99671 dataset. Gene expression levels were indicated by colors as shown by the row, red represents high expression level and blue represents low expression level. (D). OS survival curves showing the relationship of ZNF560 expression with the survival probabilities of sarcoma patients in the TCGA database.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/7fae2996eb26b70424a6562a.jpg"},{"id":68214142,"identity":"c81a808a-a40f-4ee3-878c-34b48e54e6ef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:38:38","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2066761,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBiological processes involved in ZNF560 gene signaling. \u003c/strong\u003eVolcano plots (A) and heat maps (B) showing the level of differentially expressed genes with 348 genes upregulated and 209 genes downregulated for the ZNF560 highly expressed group. Red and blue dots indicate differentially expressed genes; gray dots indicate genes that are not differentially expressed. (C). KEGG enrichment result by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of coregulated gene expression changes for ZNF560 highly expressed groups. Genes in the KEGG cell cycle mitotic, cell cycle checkpoints and DNA replication signaling pathway revealed a significant enrichment in higher expression of ZNF560 group compared with lower ZNF560 expression group. The top portion of the figure plots the enrichment scores for each gene and the bottom portion of the plot shows the value of the ranking, moving down the list of ranked genes. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/74986c707cd772e3290c6223.jpg"},{"id":68214194,"identity":"36d9a298-5453-40a7-9fe5-a618a27a1332","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:46:38","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1601421,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImmunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of ZNF560 and Kaplan–Meier survival plots for overall survival by ZNF560 status. \u003c/strong\u003e(A). ZNF560 high score tissues and ZNF560 low score tissues were prepared for IHC staining with ZNF560 antibody. Two representative images from each group are shown (magnification, left×200, right×400). (B). The clinical relevance between ZNF560 and Overall survival of osteosarcoma patients was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/5821c04040b1a32d44bbe32c.jpg"},{"id":68213839,"identity":"42944270-44aa-4c9f-89a3-b34123b0de3b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:30:39","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1513074,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eZNF560 downregulation inhibits cell viability and the clone formation of both MG63 and HOS cells. \u003c/strong\u003e(A). Real-time PCR analysis of the mRNA expression with shRNA-mediated silencing of ZNF560 gene in MG63 cells and in HOS cells. (B). Western blot analysis of bands for relative ZNF560 expression in MG63 and HOS cells. (C). Effects of ZNF560 downregulation on sarcoma cell viability assay by MTT assay. Both MG63 and HOS cells were treated for 24h,48h,72h,96h, respectively. (D, E). The effects of ZNF560 downregulation on the colony forming ability of both MG63 and HOS cells. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Data was presented as mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *** P \u0026lt; 0.001.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/db160f31908b74c973ca1674.jpg"},{"id":68213841,"identity":"b65e111f-2143-4705-8836-91ef0ff2553f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:30:39","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1763238,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFlow cytometry analysis of cell cycle distribution and apoptosis of both HOS and MG63 cells with modified expression of ZNF560. \u003c/strong\u003e(A, B). The cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry, and the number of cells in each cycle was counted by PI for nuclear staining and the percentage of cell cycle distribution was shown in the bar chart. (C, D) Apoptosis was assessed by the Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining analysis, and the proportion of apoptotic cells were shown in the bar chart. Data was presented as mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *** P \u0026lt; 0.001.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/1fafcd67bf11a969fb091ef9.jpg"},{"id":68213842,"identity":"ddb1463d-d196-448a-998a-74cebb1c781b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:30:39","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2717388,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnockdown of ZNF560 inhibits cell migration and invasion in both HOS and MG63 cells.\u003c/strong\u003e (A, B) Wound healing assay was performed to determine the cell migration in both HOS and MG63 cells. Cell migration was determined by the rate of cells moving towards the scratched area after 24h incubation using ImageJ ™ software. (C, D) Transwell assay was employed to evaluate the invasion of these cells. The quantitative results for each group are shown as the number of invaded cells 48 h after incubation. Data represented mean ± SD of three separate experiments. ∗∗∗P\u0026lt;0.001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/c754736817c3b1de13fd66c6.jpg"},{"id":73093407,"identity":"459cce0d-12a8-4efd-9926-40fef38b9033","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 16:17:22","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4954385,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/7dc9f4b1-1af9-4365-83ff-360ef5051157.pdf"},{"id":68214144,"identity":"1e42d79e-77d0-428d-93b2-5819e24e6cee","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 18:38:39","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":87175,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryInfoFile.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4956121/v1/55ef2d0a24d0c2b9424e0a26.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The zinc finger protein560(ZNF560) functions as a novel oncogenic gene in osteosarcoma","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eOsteosarcoma, a malignant bone tumor, poses a significant threat to the lives of teenagers, children, and individuals over 60 years old (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Substantial advancements have been made in the diagnosis and management of osteosarcoma in recent decades (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The implementation of multi-agent chemotherapy several decades ago resulted in a significant improvement in the 5-year event-free survival rate for localized high-grade osteosarcoma, increasing it from less than 20% to approximately 60% (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). However, chemotherapy has altered the timing, distribution, and incidence of metastases, yet it has not yielded a substantial impact on patient survival, as only 20 to 30% of patients with synchronous metastases and 30\u0026ndash;40% of those with metachronous metastases achieve a cure (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR5 CR6\" citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, the high degree of heterogeneity observed in osteosarcoma renders therapy even more problematic, which poses challenges to investigators (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Despite the identification of certain prognostic biomarkers, accurately predicting the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients remains challenging. Hence, the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, along with the investigation of potential therapeutic targets, is imperative for the efficacious management of osteosarcoma.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe human genome contains a vast family of regulatory proteins, known as zinc finger (ZNF) protein genes, which are characterized by their zinc ion\u0026ndash;binding finger-like domain (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). These proteins exhibit a multitude of functions in diverse cellular processes, encompassing transcriptional regulation, mRNA stability, and protein degradation, through their interactions with RNA, DNA, or proteins (10、11). Recent research has shown that ZNF proteins are also involved in oncogenesis and tumor progression(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13 CR14\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e), and abnormal expressions of ZNF proteins or genes have been found in malignant tumors, making them potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. For instance, the expression level of ZNF233 exhibited correlations with the grade, stage, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This suggests that ZNF233 has the potential to be developed as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). ZNF655 demonstrated a notable role in promoting the interaction between E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) and the promoter region of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1). Furthermore, the upregulation of ZNF655 expression in pancreatic cancer cells was attenuated upon suppression of CDK1. These discoveries elucidate the contributory function of ZNF655 in pancreatic cancer via its association with CDK1, thereby sparking interest in its prospective utilization as a promising therapeutic target in clinical settings (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e). ZNF331 serves crucial roles as a newly identified functional tumor-suppressor gene in inhibiting the development of gastric cancer. Suppression of ZNF331 resulted in an elevation of cell viability and enhanced colony formation ability in the gastric cancer cell line MKN45 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA study found that mutations observed in ZNF560 demonstrated a notable positive correlation with the survival of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e). An alternative study indicated that alterations in ZNF560 expression resulting from chronic hypoxia play a crucial role in the progression of prostate cancer (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, ZNF560 was identified as a high-risk gene associated with unfavorable outcomes in individuals diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e). These findings indicate a potential connection between ZNF560 and the development of tumors. Through an analysis of the GEO and TCGA databases, we identified ZNF560 as a gene associated with osteosarcoma, exhibiting distinct expression patterns in osteosarcoma tissues compared to normal tissues. The objective of this study was to comprehend the functional role of ZNF560 in osteosarcoma and assess its diagnostic and prognostic significance.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIn Silico Data Collection and Preprocessing\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eUALCAN (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://ualcan.path.uab.edu/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, version 08/16/2022), a comprehensive platform designed to facilitate gene expression and survival analyses across various cancers within the TCGA database, was employed to scrutinize the expression levels of ZNF560 in multiple cancer types, with a particular focus on sarcoma. The abbreviation of various cancers included in TCGA was shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. Gene expression profiling datasets (GSE99671) were procured from the GEO database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE99671\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE99671\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e), consisting of total RNA sequencing data from 36 fresh-frozen samples (18 tumoral bone samples and 18 non-tumoral paired samples) matching in pairs for each osteosarcoma patient [PMID: 29250102] Stringent statistical criteria, including a p-value\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 and |fold change (FC)| \u0026ge; 1.5, were applied along with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjustments to balance the identification of statistically significant genes while mitigating false positives.The ZNF560-low and ZNF560‐high groups were stratified using median values of the ZNF560 transcript in the RNAseq data from TCGA. Stringent thresholds (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01 and |fold change (FC)| \u0026ge; 2) were employed to define differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Data visualization encompassed the creation of volcano plots and heatmaps utilizing R 4.3.1. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were generated, displaying hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and log‐rank p-values, with statistical significance set at p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. The GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) methodology, providing a computational framework to investigate changes in particular biological processes and pathways within a given dataset, was employed with the software (v4.3.2 for Windows). Gene expression profiles of sarcoma patients were subjected to analysis using the \"c2.cp.kegg.v2023.1.Hs.symbols.gmt\" gene set from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB 2023.1), with a significance threshold set at P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbbreviations of various cancers in TCGA databse\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBladder Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBLCA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBreast Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBRCA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCervical Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCESC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBile Duct Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCHOL\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eColon Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCOAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEsophageal Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eESCA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlioblastoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGBM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHead and Neck Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHNSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKidney Chromophobe\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKICH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKidney Clear Cell Carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKIRC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKidney Papillary Cell Carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKIRP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiver Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLIHC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLung Adenocarcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLUAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLung Squamous Cell Carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLUSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePancreatic Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePAAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePheochromocytoma \u0026amp; Paraganglioma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCPG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProstate Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePRAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRectal Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eREAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSarcoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSARC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMelanoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSKCM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStomach Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSTAD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThyroid Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTHCA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThymoma (THYM)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTHYM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEndometrioid Cancer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUCEC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eOsteosarcoma tissues collection\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTotally 49 human osteosarcoma tissue samples were procured from patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty and orthopedic surgery for osteosarcoma at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, after obtaining approval from the local Institutional Review Board (P20230224-025). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines. Prior to enrollment, all participants provided written informed consent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eImmunohistochemistry (IHC) staining\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eImmunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was conducted on formalin-fixed tissues. The samples were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in ethanol, and subjected to 3% hydrogen peroxide treatment to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity and minimize nonspecific binding. Tissues were then incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C with primary antibodies targeting ZNF560 (1:200 dilution, Biorbyt, USA, orb26621), followed by incubation with a secondary antibody, HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200 dilution, Beyotime, A0208), at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and diaminobenzidine, hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. The proportion of positively stained cells, categorized by score for both nuclear and cytoplasmic areas, was evaluated to the nearest 5% within a standardized field of five photomicrographs per sample (across 26 OSA samples) for each antibody. H-scores were determined with the formula: H-score = [1 \u0026times; (% cells 1+)\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;2 \u0026times; (% cells 2+)\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3 \u0026times; (% cells 3+)]. Each specimen's cytoplasmic, nuclear, and total H-scores (ranging from 0 to 300) were computed for each relevant marker. An initial double-blinded researcher performed the H-score calculations and set the scoring criteria. Subsequently, a second researcher reviewed a random 10% of the samples to verify consistency and accuracy, achieving an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) exceeding 90% for all evaluated proteins. Tissue samples with staining intensity scores equal to or higher than the median values of immunohistochemistry (IHC) were classified as having high expression of ZNF560, while those with lower scores were categorized as exhibiting low expression.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCell lines and cell culture conditions\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHuman OS cells lines including HOS and MG63 were procured from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(China). Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (GIBCO, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO, USA), and maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37\u0026deg;C with 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eLentivirus transfection and cell infection\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo suppress the activity of ZNF560, cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting the human ZNF560 gene (Gene ID: 147741), along with pGCSIL-green fluorescent protein (GFP) for assessing transduction efficiency. Three shRNAs were synthesized to target specific interference sequences within ZNF560: shZNF560-1 (5\u0026rsquo;- GCTCATATCTTACCAAACATT-3\u0026rsquo;), shZNF560-2 (5\u0026rsquo;- CCGTCAGGCTTTCTTGAACAT-3\u0026rsquo;), and shZNF560-3 (5\u0026rsquo;- GTACATCCTCAGGTGTTATTG \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3\u0026rsquo;). The shRNA exhibiting the most potent interference effect on ZNF560 expression was individually selected. Lentivirus lacking the shRNA insert served as a control. HOS and MG63 cells were both seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e cells per well and transduced with shRNA-ZNF560 (5 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e TU/mL) or shRNA-NC lentivirus (7 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e TU/mL). After 72 hours of transduction, cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope and subsequently subjected to puromycin selection. Five days after infection, the downregulation of ZNF560 was confirmed via qRT-PCR analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal RNA was extracted from HOS and MG63 cells using TRIzol total RNA reagent (Pufei Biotech, China). Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized according to the instructions of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, USA). The primers targeting ZNF560 were synthesized by Gene Chem Co.Ltd. (China), with GAPDH serving as a reference gene. The primer sequences were as follows: GAPDH forward, 5\u0026rsquo;-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3\u0026rsquo;; ZNF560 forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- CCTGAAATGGTTGAATGGGTTAG-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;- CCATCAGAGTCAGAAGGGAAAGT-3\u0026rsquo;;PCNA forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- GCGTGAACCTCACCAGTATGT-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;- TCTTCGGCCCTTAGTGTAATGAT-3\u0026rsquo;; UBE2C forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- GACCTGAGGTATAAGCTCTCGC-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;- CAGGGCAGACCACTTTTCCTT-3\u0026rsquo;; CDCA5 forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- AAAGCCCATCGTCTTAAAGAGG-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;- GGGACGCTGTGTGTCTTGA-3\u0026rsquo;; CDK4 forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- TCAGCACAGTTCGTGAGGTG-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;- GTCCATCAGCCGGACAACAT-3\u0026rsquo;; CDK6 forward, 5\u0026rsquo;- TCTTCATTCACACCGAGTAGTGC-3\u0026rsquo;, and reverse, 5\u0026rsquo;-TGAGGTTAGAGCCATCTGGAAA-3\u0026rsquo;.The reactions were performed using SYBR premix Ex Taq II (Takara Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Japan). Relative expression levels of ZNF560 were analyzed by normalizing to GAPDH. The amplification process was conducted with the following thermocycling protocol: an initial reverse transcription at 50˚C for 30 minutes, followed by a denaturation step at 95˚C for 15 minutes. This was succeeded by 45 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94˚C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55˚C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72˚C for 30 seconds. The relative mRNA expression of ZNF560 was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (2\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;△△Ct\u003c/sup\u003e and 10000/2\u003csup\u003e△Ct\u003c/sup\u003e) method.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWestern blotting (WB) assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHOS and MG63 cells were treated with RIPA buffer (Beyotime) to extract proteins, and the protein concentration was quantified using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime). A total of 20 \u0026micro;g of protein per well was loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). The membrane was then incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C with the respective primary antibodies (1:500, Invitrogen, USA, PA5-41224), followed by a 2-hour incubation with secondary antibodies at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence ECL kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with GAPDH utilized as the loading control.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e3- (, )-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay and cell counting assay\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHOS and MG63 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 2000 cells per well. The MTT assay was utilized to assess cell viability for a duration of 5 days, and a growth curve was constructed to determine the cell proliferation rate. The GFP-expressing cells were detected using Celigo, and images were acquired to obtain cell counts, enabling the generation of a growth curve spanning 5 days.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAnalysis of cell cycle and apoptosis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHOS and MG63 cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a volume of 2 mL per well for a period of 5 days. To analyze apoptosis, the cells were first washed using pre-cooled D-hanks (pH\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.2\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;7.4) followed by 1\u0026times;binding buffer (eBioscience). After harvesting, the cellular pellets were reconstituted in 200 \u0026micro;L of 1\u0026times; binding buffer. Subsequently, they were subjected to staining with 10 \u0026micro;L of Annexin V-APC (eBioscience) at room temperature under dark conditions for a duration of 15 minutes. Flow cytometry analysis (Millipore) was then performed to assess the samples.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor cell cycle analysis, the cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes, followed by washing of the resulting cell pellets with pre-cooled PBS (pH\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.2\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;7.4). To induce fixation, the cells were immersed in 70% ethanol for at least 1 hour. They were later stained with propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma) and subsequently analyzed using flow cytometry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eWound-healing assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHOS and MG63 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 4000 cells per well with a volume of 100 \u0026micro;L. The experimental protocol was conducted following the procedures described in a referenced literature. In order to mitigate the influence of cell proliferation on migration, the cells were cultured in a serum-deprived medium and subjected to a 1-hour treatment with mitomycin prior to the initiation of the wound-healing experiments. A straight-line incision was then generated across the cellular monolayer using a pipette tip. Subsequent to this, the cells underwent a PBS wash, followed by fixation in 3.7% paraformaldehyde (Corning) for 15 minutes and staining with 1% crystal violet (Corning) for 10 minutes. Microscopic imaging was employed to capture cell visuals, and the measurement of the distance (in \u0026micro;m) between the incisions at 0 hours and 24 hours was conducted using Image J software (National Institutes of Health).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eTranswell assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHOS and MG63 cell lines were cultured at a density of 80,000 cells per well in Transwell chambers (24-well format, 8-mm pore size, Corning) and maintained for a period of 24 hours at a temperature of 37\u0026deg;C. The inner compartment of the Transwell chambers contained 100 \u0026micro;L of cell suspension, while the outer compartment was supplemented with 500 \u0026micro;L of DMEM medium containing 30% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After the 24-hour incubation period, non-invasive cells residing in the upper chamber were carefully eliminated, and the cells adhering to the polycarbonate membrane were fixed using 4% pre-cooled paraformaldehyde for a duration of 30 minutes. Following fixation, the cells were subjected to staining with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 20 minutes at ambient room temperature. Subsequently, high-resolution images of the cells were acquired from five randomly selected microscopic fields using a microscope with a magnification of 200\u0026times;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClone Formation Experiment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing the transfection of cells, the cell suspensions were transferred to 1.5mL Eppendorf tubes, thoroughly mixed and diluted, and subsequently seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 20,000 cells per well. The culture medium was refreshed every three days, and the cells were allowed to form clones over a period of approximately ten days. Subsequently, the culture medium was aspirated, and the cells were gently washed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for a duration of 15 minutes, followed by staining with 0.1% crystal violet for an additional 15 minutes. Finally, the cells were washed, air-dried, and subjected to photographic documentation to enumerate clonal cell clusters, followed by subsequent statistical analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe data processing was performed with GraphPad 8.0.2 and figure arrangement was carried out with Adobe Illustrator 2022. Continuous variables were reported as the means\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis for comparison among multiple groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc test. Each experiment was replicated at least three times to ensure reliability and reproducibility of the results. The significance level for all analyses was set at a P-value less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eZNF560 is highly expressed and is a poor prognostic factor in osteosarcoma\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eUtilizing UALCAN for data mining of the TCGA database, we characterized the mRNA expression of ZNF560 across 24 tumor types in comparison with their respective normal controls. As depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA, ZNF560 mRNA expression exhibited a significant elevation in various human solid tumors, notably in PRAD (Prostate adenocarcinoma), SARC (Sarcoma), THCA (Thyroid carcinoma), and THYM (Thymoma). Given the restricted availability of normal control samples within the SARC datasets, as 2 normal control and 260 sarcoma samples were included, the statistical significance of ZNF560 expression levels in comparison to both cancer and adjacent non-cancer samples is constrained. To address this limitation, we gathered data from the GSE99671 dataset, encompassing 18 tumoral osteosarcoma samples and 18 non-tumoral paired samples. Through differential gene analysis, we confirmed a total of 127 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with 110 being upregulated and 17 downregulated (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB,\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC, and supplementary table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Notably, ZNF560 exhibited significant upregulation in osteosarcoma samples. Concurrently, integrating the prognostic data of sarcoma patients from TCGA, we conducted survival analysis, revealing a noteworthy association between elevated ZNF560 expression levels and unfavorable prognosis in individuals afflicted with osteosarcoma, particularly concerning overall survival (OS; p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.012; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo delve deeper into the association between the distinct expression patterns of ZNF560 and other genes, we categorized sarcoma patients from TCGA into high and low expression cohorts using the median ZNF560 expression as the threshold. Following this stratification, we proceeded with a comparative gene analysis between these two cohorts, revealing a total of 348 upregulated genes and 209 downregulated genes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA, and supplementary table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). A heatmap illustrating the top 30 highest expressed genes is depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB, revealing that ZNF229, ZNF728, among others, exhibit similar expression patterns to ZNF560. Furthermore, employing Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) on the differential gene expression between these two groups, we discovered significant enrichments in signaling pathways related to cell cycle, cell cycle mitotic, cell cycle checkpoints, and DNA replication (Figure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC). These findings suggest a potential involvement of ZNF560 in cellular processes associated with the cell cycle and mitosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimultaneously, we gathered 49 osteosarcoma tissue specimens, which were utilized to construct tissue microarrays. ZNF560 was subjected to immunohistochemical staining, and positive scoring was conducted (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). Based on the scoring results, the specimens were categorized into a high-expression group (24 cases) and a low-expression group (25 cases). We conducted a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to examine the relationship between the expression levels of ZNF560 (high and low) and the overall survival of osteosarcoma patients. The findings demonstrated a significant association, whereby an elevation in ZNF560 expression was correlated with a notable reduction in patient survival time. This observation suggests that a higher expression level of ZNF560 is indicative of a worse prognosis in individuals with osteosarcoma (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). In summary, the elevated expression of ZNF560 is correlated with unfavorable outcomes in osteosarcoma.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eZNF560 downregulation inhibits cell viability and the clone formation of osteosarcoma cells.\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing the transfection of siRNA, we initially assessed the expression levels of ZNF560 in both HOS and MG63 cells. As depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB, a noticeable decrease in ZNF560 content was observed in cells transfected with si-ZNF560 compared to those transfected with scramble RNA, confirming the successful knockdown of ZNF560 expression. Furthermore, the results obtained from the MTT assay demonstrated a significant reduction in sarcoma cell viability upon downregulation of ZNF560(Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eC). Next, we detected the effect of ZNF560 downregulation on clone formation capability of sarcoma cells HOS and MG63. As is shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE, upon downregulation of ZNF560, the number of colonies decreased markedly compared to the untreated control cells. Moreover, expression of PCNA, UBE2C, CDCA5, CDK4, and CDK6 mRNA were downregulated after silencing of ZNF560 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eF), supporting the inhibitory effects of ZNF560 on cell proliferation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eKnockdown of ZNF560 has a potent effect to trigger cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases and to induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells.\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent studies focusing on cell cycle regulation have revealed the intricate and precise control mechanisms that govern cell cycle progression in normal cells. Any deviations from these well-defined checkpoints can result in aberrant cell proliferation and contribute to the development of cancer. Cancer cells are particularly prone to acquiring defects in these checkpoints, which ultimately leads to deregulation of the cell cycle and uncontrolled cell proliferation. In order to evaluate whether the knockdown of ZNF560 can inhibit cell cycle progression, cell cycle distribution of MG63 and HOS cells with/without ZNF560 knockdown was tested by flow cytometry(FCM). The flow cytometric analysis provided compelling evidence that the downregulation of ZNF560 induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases. This arrest was manifested by a notable accumulation of cells in the G2/M and S phases, accompanied by a concomitant decrease in the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phases. These findings unequivocally establish that the knockdown of ZNF560 elicits cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases in both HOS and MG63 cells(Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA,\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB). To estimate the percentage of apoptotic cell death upon the downregulation of ZNF560, the flow cytometric analyses were conducted in both HOS and MG63 cells for 48 hours. As is shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eC and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eD, downregulation of ZNF560 caused an increase in apoptotic population as compared to the untreated control cells. Collectively, these results demonstrated that the knockdown of ZNF560 has a potent effect to trigger cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases and to induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eZNF560 was deemed indispensable in the migration of human osteosarcoma cells.\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoth HOS and MG63 cells were subjected to transduction with ZNF560-targeting siRNA. Subsequent wound healing and Transwell assays were repeatedly performed to assess the impact of ZNF560 knockdown on cell migration in both cell lines. As depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB, the effect of ZNF560 on cell migration was evaluated using a wound healing assay. Remarkably, the inhibition of ZNF560 resulted in a profound impairment of cell migration in both HOS and MG63 cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB). Furthermore, the invasiveness of both HOS and MG63 cells was assessed through the Transwell assay to investigate the influence of ZNF560. It was observed that the proportion of ZNF560 knockdown cells that migrated was significantly lower compared to cells transfected with scramble RNA (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eD). Taken together, these findings unequivocally demonstrate that ZNF560 plays a crucial role in facilitating the motility of human osteosarcoma cells, specifically HOS and MG63 cells, and its knockdown substantially attenuates cell migration. These results strongly suggest the potential involvement of ZNF560 in the metastatic process of osteosarcoma.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOsteosarcoma, an extensively heterogeneous malignant neoplasm predominantly localized within the metaphyseal regions of long bones, exhibits varying clinical outcomes even with standard treatment protocols (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e). Multiple investigations have highlighted the constraints of the conventional AJCC staging system when it comes to accurately prognosticating outcomes for osteosarcoma patients (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e).The TNM staging system primarily focuses on tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis as key determinants, while disregarding individualized parameters such as age (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e).. Lately, the reevaluation of public database datasets through bioinformatic techniques has surfaced as a promising approach for uncovering prognostic biomarkers in malignancies. For instance, Wu et al. (2020) created an eight-gene prognostic model and nomogram to precisely forecast clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e). In this investigation, information pertaining to osteosarcoma patients was retrieved from the TCGA and GSE databases, and the differentially expressed genes as well as ZNF560 data were acquired and scrutinized to develop a prognostic risk model.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn ideal diagnostic biomarker is anticipated to demonstrate exceptional sensitivity, enabling its detection in the majority of tumors, along with remarkable specificity, ensuring its absence in normal control samples. Nevertheless, it is uncommon for biomarkers to fulfill these criteria individually, necessitating the combination of molecular panels to attain a reliable and robust test (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e). The newly discovered ZNF560, as presented in this paper, exhibits remarkable specificity and satisfactory sensitivity specifically in osteosarcoma, making it a valuable candidate as a cancer biomarker. Integrating ZNF560 with other biomarkers unique to osteosarcoma would enhance its effectiveness in the detection of cancer. In a recent investigation conducted by Xing Y et al, ZNF692 was unveiled as a novel oncogene with significant implications as a potential therapeutic target in colon adenocarcinoma (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimited research has been conducted on the potential oncogenic properties of ZNF560. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the ZNF family of regulatory proteins are widely distributed and recognized as one of the most prevalent families in this category (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e). Examples include ZNF233, which exhibited associations with tumor grade, tumor stage, and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) and ZNF331 serves crucial roles as a newly discovered functional tumor-suppressor gene in suppressing gastric carcinogenesis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e). Considering the roles played by various zinc finger proteins, ZNF560 could potentially serve as a suitable subject for further examination. In this research, decreased expression of ZNF560 resulted in decreased cell viability, reduced colony numbers, and induced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Additionally, ZNF560 was necessary for HOS and MG63 human osteosarcoma cell migration. In aggregate, these findings suggest that the transcription factor ZNF560 demonstrates considerable potential as a promising prognostic biomarker and a prospective therapeutic target for individuals afflicted with osteosarcoma.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExisting research has demonstrated that ZNFs facilitate tumorigenicity through the inhibition of cell cycle arrest. For instance, the aberrant overexpression of ZNF671 resulted in the imposition of S phase arrest in NPC cells through the upregulation of p21 and concurrent downregulation of cyclin D1 and c-myc, thereby manifesting its regulatory influence on cell cycle progression (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e). As another illustration, the ectopic upregulation of ZNF23 led to a substantial elevation in p27kip-1 expression, exerting a suppressive effect on cellular proliferation and prompting cell cycle arrest specifically within the G1 phase(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e). The study conducted by L He and colleagues definitively established that the depletion of ZNF384 expression significantly impedes the proliferative capacity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells by inducing cell cycle arrest precisely at the critical checkpoint of G1/S phase transition (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e). In this investigation, we demonstrated that the expression level of ZNF560 correlated with patient prognosis. Upon downregulating ZNF560 expression using shRNA in osteosarcoma cell lines, we observed cell cycle arrest at the G2/S transition in ZNF560 knockdown cells. Preliminary indications propose that ZNF560 might be involved in the transcriptional regulation of the cyclin family (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e); nevertheless, additional elucidation is warranted to enhance our comprehension of this intricate association.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, ZNF560 appears to hold promise as a potential prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma. Nonetheless, it is crucial to address certain limitations within this study. Firstly, the evaluation of the ZNF protein gene-based signature predominantly relied on publicly available datasets, necessitating validation at both the mRNA and protein levels using our own cohort of osteosarcoma patients. Secondly, the utilization of certain bioinformatics tools, such as the Kaplan-Meier plotter, may possess restricted functionality without the incorporation of multivariable Cox regression analysis. Lastly, there is a lack of direct in vivo evidence to verify the mechanism of ZNF560 in the tumorigenicity of osteosarcoma. To address this, we aim to establish a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice model to further elucidate the role of ZNF560 in tumor formation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by the Project of Nantong Municipal Health Commission(MS2022016)and Project of Jiangsu Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (MS2022090).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated and/or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eXiong Dong\u0026nbsp;was\u0026nbsp;responsible for the literature search、experiment and discussion. ZhiMing\u0026nbsp;Cui\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;Ziliang Yu\u0026nbsp;made substantial contributions to conception and design, conducted a thorough review of the manuscript for its significant intellectual content and gave his approval to the final version. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePatient consent for publication\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao, X. et al. Osteosarcoma: a review of current and future therapeutic approaches. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 20(1): p. 24.[PMID: 33653371] (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGaspar, N. et al. Recent advances in understanding osteosarcoma and emerging therapies. Faculty Reviews, 9: p. 18.[PMID: 33659950] (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmeland, S. et al. Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort. \u003cem\u003eEur. J. Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e109\u003c/b\u003e, 36\u0026ndash;50 (2019). [PMID: 30685685].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarec-Berard, P. et al. A multicentric randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating high-dose thiotepa as adjuvant treatment to standard chemotherapy in patients with resectable relapsed osteosarcoma. \u003cem\u003eEur. J. Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e125\u003c/b\u003e, 58\u0026ndash;68 (2020). [PMID: 31838406].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eItaliano, A. et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. \u003cem\u003eLancet Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e21\u003c/b\u003e (3), 446\u0026ndash;455 (2020). [PMID: 32078813].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBoye, K. et al. Pembrolizumab in advanced osteosarcoma: results of a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. \u003cem\u003eCancer Immunol. Immunother.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e70\u003c/b\u003e (9), 2617\u0026ndash;2624 (2021). [PMID: 33580363].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQayed, M. et al. A phase I study of sirolimus in combination with metronomic therapy (CHOAnome) in children with recurrent or refractory solid and brain tumors. \u003cem\u003ePediatr. Blood Cancer\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e67\u003c/b\u003e(4): p. (2020). e28134.[PMID: 31876107].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarcia-Ortega, D. Y. et al. An overview of resistance to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma and future perspectives. Cancer Drug Resistance, 5(2): pp. 762\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;93.[PMID: 36176756] (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, X. et al. Structures and biological functions of zinc finger proteins and their roles in hepatocellular carcinoma. \u003cem\u003eBiomark. Res.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e(1): p. (2022). 2.[PMID: 35000617].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBu, S. et al. Zinc Finger Proteins in Neuro-Related Diseases Progression. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15: p. 760567.[PMID: 34867169] (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCassandri, M. et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discovery, 3(1): p. 17071.[PMID: 29152378] (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJen, J. \u0026amp; Wang, Y. Zinc finger proteins in cancer progression. Journal of Biomedical Science, 23(1): p. 53.[PMID: 27411336] (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYe, Q., Liu, J. \u0026amp; Xie, K. Zinc finger proteins and regulation of the hallmarks of cancer. Histology and histopathology, 34(10): p. 1097.[PMID: 31045237] (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, S. et al. Zinc Finger Proteins in the War on Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Potential. Cells, 12(9): p. 1314.[PMID: 37174714] (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, S. \u0026amp; Liu, R. Insights into the pleiotropic roles of ZNF703 in cancer. \u003cem\u003eHeliyon\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e(9): p. (2023). e20140.[PMID: 37810156].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXie, W. et al. Knockdown of ZNF233 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Gene, 679: pp. 179\u0026ndash;185.[PMID: 30179682] (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShao, Z. et al. ZNF655 accelerates progression of pancreatic cancer by promoting the binding of E2F1 and CDK1. \u003cem\u003eOncogenesis\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e11\u003c/b\u003e (1), 44 (2022). [PMID: 35927248].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYu, J. et al. Zinc-finger protein 331, a novel putative tumor suppressor, suppresses growth and invasiveness of gastric cancer. \u003cem\u003eOncogene\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e32\u003c/b\u003e (3), 307\u0026ndash;317 (2013). [PMID: 22370639].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCho, H. et al. Association of specific gene mutations derived from machine learning with survival in lung adenocarcinoma. \u003cem\u003ePLOS ONE\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e(11): p. (2018). e0207204.[PMID: 30419062].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCameron, S. et al. Chronic hypoxia favours adoption to a castration-resistant cell state in prostate cancer. Oncogene, 42(21): pp. 1693\u0026ndash;1703.[PMID: 37020039] (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, J. et al. Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Risk-Scoring Model Based on Ferroptosis-Associated Cluster in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. \u003cem\u003eFront. Cell. Dev. Biology\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e, 800267 (2022). [PMID: 35127715].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeird, H. C. et al. Osteosarcoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 8(1): p. 77.[PMID: 36481668] (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, M. S. et al. Prognostic nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgery for AJCC stage II extremity osteosarcoma. \u003cem\u003eAnn. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e20\u003c/b\u003e (5), 955\u0026ndash;960 (2009). [PMID: 19153123].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBalachandran, V. P. et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. \u003cem\u003eLancet Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e16\u003c/b\u003e(4): p. (2015). e173-e180.[PMID: 25846097].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWu, G. \u0026amp; Zhang, M. A novel risk score model based on eight genes and a nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with osteosarcoma. \u003cem\u003eBMC Cancer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e20\u003c/b\u003e (1), 456 (2020). [PMID: 32448271].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRansohoff, D. F. Developing Molecular Biomarkers for Cancer. Science, 299(5613): pp. 1679\u0026ndash;1680.[PMID: 12637728] (2003).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXing, Y. et al. ZNF692 promotes colon adenocarcinoma cell growth and metastasis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e54\u003c/b\u003e (5), 1691\u0026ndash;1703 (2019). [PMID: 30816443].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhu, L. et al. The diagnostic significance of the ZNF gene family in pancreatic cancer: a bioinformatics and experimental study. Frontiers in Genetics, 14: p. 1089023.[PMID: 37396042] (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang, J. et al. Epigenetic mediated zinc finger protein 671 downregulation promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by inhibiting cell cycle arrest. \u003cem\u003eJ. Experimental Clin. Cancer Res.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e36\u003c/b\u003e(1): p. (2017). 147.[PMID: 29052525].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang, C. et al. Characterization of ZNF23, a KRAB-containing protein that is downregulated in human cancers and inhibits cell cycle progression. \u003cem\u003eExp. Cell Res.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e313\u003c/b\u003e (2), 254\u0026ndash;263 (2007). [PMID: 17137575].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHe, L. et al. Overexpression of zinc finger protein 384 (ZNF 384), a poor prognostic predictor, promotes cell growth by upregulating the expression of Cyclin D1 in Hepatocellular carcinoma. \u003cem\u003eCell Death Dis.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e(6): p. (2019). 444.[PMID: 31168049].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Osteosarcoma, ZNF560, biomarker, tumorigenesis, prognosis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbnormal expression of Zinc finger (ZNF) genes is commonly observed in osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent malignant bone tumor in children and teenagers. This project focused on the role of ZNF560 in the progress of OS.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe published datasets including TCGA-SARC and GSE99671 was utilized to screen out the abnormal expression of ZNF560 and associated gene patterns in sarcoma and OS tissues. Prognosis value of ZNF560 was identified in TCGA-SARC and OS cohorts. In order to manipulate ZNF560 expression in HOS and MG63 osteosarcoma (OS) cells, genetic strategies such as shRNA constructs were utilized. The expression patterns of ZNF560 were analyzed through techniques such as immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and qRT-PCR.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy analyzing data from both the GEO and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, increased expression of ZNF560 in OS tissues was verified, which was significantly associated with poorer outcomes in osteosarcoma patients both in TCGA-SARC and our own OS cohorts. Additionally, downregulation of ZNF560 resulted in decreased cell viability, fewer colonies, and induced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. Moreover, ZNF560 was found to be essential for migration of human osteosarcoma HOS and MG63 cells.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollectively, these findings suggest that ZNF560 has the potential to serve as a predictive biomarker for osteosarcoma.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The zinc finger protein560(ZNF560) functions as a novel oncogenic gene in osteosarcoma","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-11-04 18:30:34","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4956121/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-10-14T13:24:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-11T16:38:31+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"186059815230286538927296026678162305835","date":"2024-10-01T03:39:46+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-09-27T12:47:32+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"283625017653235803356972330461844947398","date":"2024-09-17T21:08:20+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-09-12T02:10:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-09-12T01:48:55+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-09-11T14:17:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-09-10T11:26:11+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2024-08-22T07:46:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"53b1529c-bac1-4128-847b-06ddfbbca3a0","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 4th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":38917720,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer"},{"id":38917721,"name":"Biological sciences/Cell biology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-06T16:03:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4956121","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79298-y","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-01-02 15:57:49","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 2nd, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-11-04 18:30:34","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-024-79298-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79298-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4956121","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4956121","identity":"rs-4956121","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0