Energy trade-offs under fluctuating light govern bioenergetics and growth in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,830 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Rapidly changing light intensity is a natural challenge that photosynthetic organisms can tolerate. Regulatory mechanisms of light harvesting and alternative electron pathways are critical in dissipating and distributing energy under fluctuating light intensities (FL), but less is known about downstream metabolic regulations. Here, we compared the cellular responses of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii grown under FL to cells acclimated to constant high (HL) or low light (LL), either under high (2 %) or low (0.04 %) CO2. Under low CO2, the physiology of FL cells resembled HL cells and proteomics revealed an induction of the ATP consuming carbon-concentrating mechanism, and photorespiration particularly under FL. High CO2 promoted growth under FL, albeit by a lesser extent than under HL and led to higher ATP contents than under low CO2. To fuel ATP production under low CO2, cells upregulated mitochondrial respiration under FL, while enhanced cyclic electron flow and redox shuttling between intracellular compartments was most evident under FL and LL. Chloroplastic carbon metabolism rapidly responded to light changes, independent of CO2 availability, whereas metabolites associated with mitochondrial bioenergetics responded slower, and remained abundant under high CO2. The accumulation of enzymes involved in starch synthesis and breakdown under FL, together with the transient accumulation of hexoses and hexose phosphates, indicated that cells relied on sugars as a transient carbon pool to meet changing metabolic demands under FL. We conclude that the interplay between light intensity and CO₂ availability drives critical energy trade-offs, balancing photoprotection, repair, and carbon allocation, that regulate growth under FL. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:32:23.968882+00:00