Full text
21,933 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Impact of LP.8.1-Adapted mRNA Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralisation | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Impact of LP.8.1-Adapted mRNA Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralisation C Happle , M Hoffmann , MV Stankov , I Nehlmeier , A Eichmann , T Witte , L Manthey , S Pöhlmann , A Dopfer-Jablonka , View ORCID Profile GMN Behrens doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.21.25338461 C Happle 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany 2 Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology, and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany 3 German Center for Lung Research, Biomedical Research in End-stage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH) , Hannover, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site M Hoffmann 4 Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , 37077 Göttingen, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site MV Stankov 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site I Nehlmeier 4 Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , 37077 Göttingen, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site A Eichmann 4 Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , 37077 Göttingen, Germany 5 Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-August-University Göttingen , 37073 Göttingen, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site T Witte 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany 6 Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover Medical School , 30625 Hannover, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site L Manthey 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site S Pöhlmann 4 Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , 37077 Göttingen, Germany 5 Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-August-University Göttingen , 37073 Göttingen, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site A Dopfer-Jablonka 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany 7 German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hannover-Braunschweig , 30625 Hannover, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: Behrens.georg{at}mh-hannover.de GMN Behrens 1 Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School , Hannover 30625, Germany 6 Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover Medical School , 30625 Hannover, Germany 7 German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hannover-Braunschweig , 30625 Hannover, Germany 8 CiiM, Centre for Individualized Infection Medicine , Hannover, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for GMN Behrens For correspondence: Behrens.georg{at}mh-hannover.de Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, with successive variants evading immunity established through prior infection or vaccination. By mid-2025, the XFG lineage emerged and began replacing LP.8.1 across multiple geographical regions, indicating further adaptive evolution within the JN.1-derived clade. We therefore assessed immune responses in 42 healthcare workers who received 30 μg of LP.8.1-adapted mRNA vaccine (Comirnaty LP.8.1, BioNTech–Pfizer, Mainz, Germany) in September 2025. Post LP.8.1 vaccination, anti-spike IgG and anti-spike omicron IgG changed 2·2-fold and 1·9-fold, respectively, revealing significant increases. Neutralising antibody responses against pseudovirus particles (pp) with spike proteins of various SARS-CoV-2 variants revealed a significant increase in neutralisation of JN.1pp (mean change 4·2-fold), LP.8.1pp (8·2-fold), NB.1.8.1pp (8·6-fold), XFGpp (16·5-fold), and BA.3.2.2pp (2·2-fold). Fold increase in GMT neutralisation post-vaccination was highest for XFGpp whilst absolute post-vaccination neutralisation GMT was lowest for BA.3.2.2pp. Our data suggest that the LP.8.1 mRNA vaccination most likely increases protection against severe disease courses and sequelae of COVID-19 caused by the currently circulating XFG variant. Strengthening humoral immunity against BA.3.2 variants may require further vaccine refinement. SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, with successive variants evading immunity established through prior infection or vaccination. In mid-2024, a vaccine tailored to the JN.1 variant was authorized, which boosted neutralizing antibody responses and provided substantial protection against severe disease and hospitalization ( 1 - 3 ). Around six months later, in January 2025, LP.8.1, a JN.1 descendant, was classified as a variant under monitoring by the World Health Organization, due to its epidemiological significance and enhanced transmission fitness relative to contemporaneous strains. After emerging in late 2024, LP.8.1 rapidly overtook the XEC variant, establishing dominance throughout the Americas and Europe by early 2025. In the United States, LP.8.1 represented approximately 50% of COVID-19 cases by May 2025 ( 4 ). While KP.2- and JN.1-adapted vaccines generated neutralising antibodies against LP.8.1, these titres were reduced compared to earlier JN.1-lineage variants, indicating continued antigenic drift ( 5 ). By mid-2025, the XFG lineage emerged and began replacing LP.8.1 across multiple geographical regions, indicating further adaptive evolution within the JN.1-derived clade. Subsequent investigations confirmed robust immune evasion coupled with diminished ACE2 receptor binding efficiency for the XFG variant ( 5 ). Given antigenic evolution and declining neutralising antibody concentrations, protection conferred by the JN.1-adapted vaccine is now considered reduced. Consequently, on July 24, 2025, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized a monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine encoding the LP.8.1 variant spike protein (Comirnaty LP.8.1, BioNTech–Pfizer, Mainz, Germany). This formulation represents the most current update to the mRNA vaccine platform, designed to target the prevalent circulating strain. Upon authorization, data on human immunogenicity and clinical effectiveness remained scarce. We therefore assessed immune responses in 42 healthcare workers (median age 57 years [IQR 16]; 18 [43%] male) who received 30 μg of the LP.8.1-adapted mRNA vaccine in September 2025. We obtained serum samples immediately before vaccination and at a median of 14 days (IQR 0, range 13– 16 days) post-vaccination to characterise humoral immune responses. Participants had received a median of five previous COVID-19 vaccinations (IQR 1, range 3–9), with a median interval of 13 months (IQR 8, range 10–46 months) since their last vaccination. Of 42 individuals, 35 (83%) reported at least one prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (median 1 infection [IQR 1, range 0–5], Appendix p2). We first quantified SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG antibodies before and following LP.8.1 vaccination. Prior to LP.8.1 immunisation, participants showed a median of 1994·0 (IQR 1910·0) binding-antibody units (BAU) per mL of anti-spike (Wuhan-Hu-S1) IgG antibodies and a median of 422·1 (IQR 238·2) relative units (RU) per mL of anti-spike omicron IgG antibodies (Figure A) . Post LP.8.1 vaccination, anti-spike IgG and anti-spike omicron IgG changed 2·2-fold and 1·9-fold, respectively, revealing significant increases (p<0·0001; Figure A) comparable to that observed after vaccination with the JN.1-adapted vaccine ( 3 ). Next, we assessed neutralising antibody responses against pseudovirus particles (pp) with spike proteins of various SARS-CoV-2 variants before and after vaccination. Pre-vaccination sera demonstrated neutralising activity against JN.1pp (response rate 100%, geometric mean titre [GMT] 467), LP.8.1pp (95%, GMT 169), NB.1.8.1pp (100%, GMT 126), XFGpp (81%, GMT 24), and BA.3.2.2pp (100%, GMT 92). Compared with LP.8.1pp, pre-vaccination neutralisation was 2·8-fold higher for JN.1pp, but lower for the others with a 1·3-fold change for NB.1.8.1pp, 7·0-fold change for XFGpp, and a 1·8-fold change in neutralization for BA.3.2.2pp (Figure B) . After vaccination, the response rates increased significantly for all pseudoviruses (Figure C) . We observed a significant increase in neutralisation of JN.1pp (mean change 4·2-fold), LP.8.1pp (8·2-fold), NB.1.8.1pp (8·6-fold), XFGpp (16·5-fold), and BA.3.2.2pp (2·2-fold). Fold increase in GMT neutralisation post-vaccination was highest for XFGpp whilst absolute post-vaccination neutralisation GMT was lowest for BA.3.2.2pp. XFG is currently the most prevalent variant on the global level and the LP.8.1 vaccination strongly augments the neutralisation for this variant. However, we also found that BA.3.2, which has spreadacross four continents with low prevalence, evades antibody responses after vaccination with higher efficiency than the globally dominant variant XFG ( 6 , 7 ). Consequently, the neutralisation potential installed upon LP.8.1 vaccination may not be sufficient to halt BA.3.2 from achieving high global prevalence in the future, although additional factors including improved ACE2 binding and augmented lung cell entry are likely prerequisites for such expansion ( 7 ). We note that our study population exhibited rates of hybrid immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants before vaccination, with 83% experiencing prior SARS-CoV-2 infections and all being previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with a median of five vaccinations. This could have affected the magnitude and quality of humoral immunity induced by the LP.8.1-adapted vaccine and might not be representative of other populations. Despite these considerations, and some limitations listed in detail in the Appendix (p 5), our data support the notion that the mRNA vaccine against omicron LP.8.1 most likely increases protection against severe disease courses and sequelae of COVID-19 caused by the currently circulating XFG variant. Strengthening humoral immunity against BA.3.2 variants may require further vaccine refinement. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Competing Interests M.H., I.N., A.E., and S.P. did contract research (testing of vaccinee sera for neutralising activity against SARS-CoV-2) for Valneva, unrelated to this work. G.M.N.B. declares serving as a lecturer for Pfizer and adviser for Moderna, unrelated to this work. S.P. served as an adviser for BioNTech, unrelated to this work. A.D.-J. and T.W. served as advisers for Pfizer, unrelated to this work. All other authors declare no competing interests. C.H. and M.H. are co-first authors. A.D.-J. and G.M.N.B. are co-senior authors. Download figure Open in new tab Figure. Humoral immune responses after mRNA omicron LP.8.1 vaccination. (A) Serum concentrations of Wuhan-Hu-1 spike-specific IgG and omicron S-specific IgG (n=42) obtained before (Pre) or after (Post) vaccination with the mRNA omicron LP8.1 vaccine. (B) Neutralisation of vesicular stomatitis virus-based pseudovirus particles bearing the indicated S proteins by donor-matched serum (n=41). Data are grouped to compare differences in SARS-CoV-2 lineage-specific neutralisation before and after omicron LP.8.1 vaccination. Information on GMT (also indicated by horizontal lines), response rates, and mean fold change in neutralisation compared with LP.8.1 pseudovirus particles are indicated above the graphs. Data represent GMT (coloured columns) from a single experiment, performed with four technical replicates. The lowest serum dilution tested (dashed lines) and the threshold (lower limit of detection; grey shaded areas) are indicated. Of note, for graphical reasons, serum samples yielding a 50% neutralisation titre value below 6·25 (limit of detection) were manually set at bottom of the axis. (C) Data are regrouped to compare differences in SARS-CoV-2 lineage-specific neutralization before and after vaccination. Information on response rates and mean fold change in neutralisation after vaccination are indicated above the graphs. Individual neutralisation data are available in the appendix (pp 9–10). GMT=geometric mean titres. Footnotes ↵ # co-first authorship * co-senior authorship References 1. ↵ Hansen CH , Lassaunière R , Rasmussen M , Moustsen-Helms IR , Valentiner-Branth P. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 JN.1-adapted vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalisation and death: a Danish, nationwide, register-based, cohort study . Lancet Infect Dis 2025 ; 29 : S1473-3099(25)00380-9. 2. Cai M , Xie Y , Al-Aly Z. Association of 2024-2025 Covid-19 Vaccine with Covid-19 Outcomes in U.S. Veterans . N Engl J Med 2025 Oct 8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2510226 . OpenUrl CrossRef 3. ↵ Happle C , Hoffmann M , Kempf A , Nehlmeier I , Stankov MV , Calderon Hampel N , Witte T , Pöhlmann S , Behrens GMN , Dopfer-Jablonka A. Humoral immunity after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 omicron JN.1 vaccination . Lancet Infect Dis 2024 ; 24 ( 11 ): e674 – e676 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ CDC . COVID Data Tracker 2025 . https://www.cdc.gov/covid/php/variants/variants-and-genomic-surveillance.html (accessed Oct 7, 2025 ) 5. ↵ Zhang L , Kempf A , Nehlmeier I , Chen N , Stankov MV , Happle C , Dopfer-Jablonka A , Behrens GMN , Hoffmann M , Pöhlmann S. Host cell entry and neutralisation sensitivity of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant LP.8.1 . Lancet Infect Dis 2025 ; 25 ( 4 ): e196 – e197 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Guo C , Yu Y , Liu J , Jian F , Yang S , Song W , Yu L , Shao F , Cao Y. Antigenic and virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants BA.3.2, XFG, and NB.1.8.1 . Lancet Infect Dis 2025 ; 25 ( 7 ): e374 – e377 . OpenUrl PubMed 7. ↵ Zhang L , Chen N , Eichmann A , Nehlmeier I , Moldenhauer A-S , Stankov MV , Happle C , Dopfer-Jablonka A , Behrens GMN , Hoffmann M , Pöhlmann S. Epidemiology and virological update on the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.3.2 . Lancet Infect Dis (in revision) View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 23, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Impact of LP.8.1-Adapted mRNA Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralisation Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Impact of LP.8.1-Adapted mRNA Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralisation C Happle , M Hoffmann , MV Stankov , I Nehlmeier , A Eichmann , T Witte , L Manthey , S Pöhlmann , A Dopfer-Jablonka , GMN Behrens medRxiv 2025.10.21.25338461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.21.25338461 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Impact of LP.8.1-Adapted mRNA Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralisation C Happle , M Hoffmann , MV Stankov , I Nehlmeier , A Eichmann , T Witte , L Manthey , S Pöhlmann , A Dopfer-Jablonka , GMN Behrens medRxiv 2025.10.21.25338461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.21.25338461 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (567) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (297) Cardiovascular Medicine (4411) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (380) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1505) Epidemiology (15205) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1119) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6574) Geriatric Medicine (666) Health Economics (994) Health Informatics (4511) Health Policy (1365) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1608) Hematology (537) HIV/AIDS (1263) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15903) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (620) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (665) Neurology (6573) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1139) Occupational and Environmental Health (954) Oncology (3319) Ophthalmology (967) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (662) Pediatrics (1689) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5421) Public and Global Health (9205) Radiology and Imaging (2191) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1367) Respiratory Medicine (1191) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe8a56e7aa88650',t:'MTc3OTI1MTg0Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.