Colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation
RCT
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary
Colonic exclusion and colorectal anastomosis demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy for refractory constipation compared to subtotal colectomy, characterized by significantly shorter surgical time, smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, and shorter hospital stays.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractory constipation were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 18). Fourteen patients in treatment group underwent colonic exclusion and end-to-side colorectal anastomosis. Eighteen patients in control group received subtotal colectomy and end-to-end colorectal anastomosis. The therapeutic effects of the operations were assessed by comparing the surgical time, incision length, volume of blood losses, hospital stay, recovery rate and complication incidence. All patients received long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: All operations were successful and patients recovered fully after the operations. In comparison of treatment group and control group, the surgical time (h), incision length (cm), volume of blood losses (mL), hospital stay (d) were 87 +/- 16 min vs 194 +/- 23 min (t = 9.85), 10.4 +/- 0.5 cm vs 21.2 +/- 1.8 cm (t = 14.26), 79.5 +/- 31.3 mL vs 286.3 +/- 49.2 mL (t = 17.24), and 11.8 +/- 2.4 d vs 18.6 +/- 2.6 d (t = 6.91), respectively (P 0.05), 21.4% vs 33.3% (P = 0.73 > 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Colonic exclusion has better therapeutic efficacy on refractory constipation. It has many advantages such as shorter surgical time, smaller incision, fewer blood losses and shorter hospital stay.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-11-08T09:52:27.483963+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:12.251519+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0