Faculty Opinions recommendation of Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic review / meta-analysis
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This Faculty Opinions recommendation highlights a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Read the full review for this Faculty Opinions recommended article: Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK